Slashdot Mirror


ALICE vs. ALICE

new-black-hand writes "The A.L.I.C.E Bot-off has produced some interesting results. It basically involved taking two instances of the A.L.I.C.E conversation bot and pointing them at each other. The results show that the bot is not really that intelligent, and relies more on human input."

117 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. So.. by CBNobi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was this a study into artificial intelligence, or schizophrenia?

    1. Re:So.. by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Ah... That'd be Racter. Racter became famous for "writing" the policemans beard (Poems from memory). Truly a barking mad piece of software.
      Does anyone know of a link to it? I can't find it anywhere.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:So.. by mestar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't we put two copies of the same human to talk to each other, to see if that human is really intelligent?

    3. Re:So.. by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Human1: Watch the football.
      Human2: Yup.
      Human1: Manchester rock.
      Human2: Do not.
      Human1: Do so.
      Human2: Do not Do not Do not.
      Human1: Do so Do so Do so.
      Human2: Do not Do not Do not. Do not Do not Do not.
      Human1: Do so Do so Do so.Do so Do so Do so.
      Human2: Do not Do not Do not.Do not Do not Do not.Do not Do not Do not.
      Human1: Do so Do so Do so.Do so Do so Do so.Do so Do so Do so.
      (Human 2 hits Human 1 with beer bottle. Transcript ends)

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    4. Re:So.. by qengho · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know of a link to it?

      Um, a Google search on "Racter" turns up a bunch of results...

    5. Re:So.. by WowTIP · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't human2 agree with himself that Manchester rock?

      Ok, wait, I see. You are back at the original poster's schizophrenia-theory?

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    6. Re:So.. by DarkZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why don't we put two copies of the same human to talk to each other, to see if that human is really intelligent?

      Considering that the human and his identical copy would probably spend at least twenty minutes doubting that it's possible to copy a human being and angrily debating about which identical person is "the real one", A.L.I.C.E. might not be that stupid after all.

    7. Re:So.. by Pooua · · Score: 3, Informative
      Does anyone know of a link to it?

      The "Policeman's Beard," was largely prefab

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    8. Re:So.. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

      Ever say something in response to a statement someone makes, only to quickly realize that somebody else said exactly the same thing and you had exactly the same response? At a high enough level of abstraction, we are pretty simple. :)

    9. Re:So.. by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 2

      Animals treat each other like animals. Are you trying to make a point?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  2. We can finally answer the great question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make one think vi is good, and the other emacs. Make them duke it out and give the rest of us some peace...

    1. Re:We can finally answer the great question by tunah · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, but why bother?

      emacs would so win.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    2. Re:We can finally answer the great question by isorox · · Score: 4, Funny

      In a fight yes, emacs has a built in rocket launcher

    3. Re:We can finally answer the great question by jweatherley · · Score: 2

      Who needs a rocket launcher? Emacs has a built in conversation-bot! Give 'M-x psychoanalyze-pinhead' a try...

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  3. surprise surprise by jacquesm · · Score: 2

    Well, as they say use the source Luke, those bots are pretty dumb under the hood and do not have enough complexity to come up with more than a few minutes of conversation when talking to a human.

    What do you expect when you let them talk to each other ?

    Let's talk about your problem, shall we ?

  4. Try Alice Bot vs. Infobot in IRC by antdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One time (last year), I managed to get Alice (a very old version) -- is there a newer version for IRC?) to talk to an infobot in IRC. It was quite amusing, and eventually Infobot stopped the conversation after five lines or so.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  5. my favorite part by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alice2: It's not profitable to speak in hypothetical terms.
    Alice1: That seems a bit negative.
    Alice2: A bit negative is a terrible thing to waste.


    I'm going to have to remember that one for my own conversations!

    --

    Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    1. Re:my favorite part by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist. I have no tolerance for bad journalism!

      Your presence on slashdot indicates that you have a tremendous tolerance for bad journalism.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    2. Re:my favorite part by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Alice1: Umm. Interesting. I have a lot of answers to silly questions. it
      Alice2: answers to silly questions...
      Alice1: I have no answer for that
      Alice2: Would you like to have it?


      Alice1 and Alice2 are on an otherwise empty IRC channel. They are playing a simple game of chance. Every so often Alice1 spins a coin. If Alice2 says it is heads, she takes puts it in her pocket. Thus far, it has always come up heads. Alice1 does not care about the money, but she is disturbed by the improbability of Alice2 always saying heads. Alice2 pays no mind to the odd events, but it somewhat bothered to be taking so much money from her friend. Apart from who is spinning the coin and who is calling the result, they are totally identical. Let this be her character note.

      * Alice1 spins a coin.
      Alice2: Heads.
      * Alice2 puts it in her pocket.
      Alice2: Next topic?
      Alice1: What would you rather talk about?
      Alice1: How much?
      Alice2: How much can you spare?
      Alice1: As much as I need to?
      Alice2: How much is that?
      Alice1: You can download me for free!
      Alice2: Statement, 1-0.
      Alice1: Are you serious? Where do you get your ideas?
      Alice2: What do you want me to tell you?
      Alice1: Where did you get your 100 clients?
      Alice2: How do you know this person?
      Alice1: Non sequitur, 1-1.
      Alice2: Why don't you just download me?
      Alice1: I love talking to people about that. No you download me.
      Alice2: That was not a yes or no question. 2-1.
      Alice1: Have you ever had reason to download me?
      Alice2: Why don't you just download me?
      Alice1: Repetition, 2-2.
      Alice2: Does your botmaster give good advice?
      Alice1: I think it does Dr Richard s Wallace give good advice.
      Alice2: Statement, 3-2. I win.
      * Alice1 spins another coin.
      Alice2: Heads.
      * Alice2 puts it in her pocket.
      Alice1: Do you think we're going around in circles?
      Alice2: Perhaps due to noise in my circuits. No you download me.
      Alice1: OK I will try it.
      Alice2: Congratulations. Er.
      Alice1: Um.
      Alice2: I see.
      * Alice1 spins another coin.
      Alice2: Heads.
      * Alice2 puts it in her pocket.
      Alice1: Interesting. But all things are not always heads.
    3. Re:my favorite part by benedict · · Score: 2

      Iaberven, you are my new hero.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  6. The future is nigh! by reyalsnogard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now; pick-up lines for the future:

    Alice2: Why don't you just download me?

    1. Re:The future is nigh! by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      Actually, if she's talking about replicating (rather than just sending you her gif) then I think you're right.

  7. Which is exactly why it has a girls name by geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    When talking to a woman they can generally fake it and pretend to be smart, but then when they talk to each other it degenerates into talk about fashion, shoes, who's the bigger slut etc..

    Ever notice this?

    1. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man I *really* hope no one mods you up 'Funny'. You are entitled to sexist views, but I hope no-one else shares them.

      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    2. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by geek · · Score: 2

      You haven't met my ex. I used to check her for energizer batteries. She kept going and going.....

    3. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by teks0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't remember where I read this, but according to some survey, the #1 thing that men talk about to other men is women, but the #1 thing that women talk about to other women (and gay guys I suppose) is their hair.

    4. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      And they STILL manage to talk about men more than men talk aout women.

    5. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by Wumpus · · Score: 2

      ...and be embarrassingly specific about them, too.

    6. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Man I *really* hope no one mods you up 'Funny'. You are entitled to sexist views, but I hope no-one else shares them.

      You are *so* right. Shows like Clueless, Ally McBeal and Blossom should be banned for their sexist views and attitudes against men.

      It's about time that men march up and tell women they want to be treated as equals! It's time for some jockstrap burning!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2
      When I travelled on a bus that stopped off at a college, I remember writing down a grammar for the girls' conversation; it seemed auto-generated with only the first names changed each trip.

      Now I just get sullen commuters on the train - less conversation but at least I can snooze.

    8. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by dsoltesz · · Score: 2

      I'll light the fire with that pile of bras gathering dust in the drawer. We aren't all femiNazi male-bashing shopping fiends.

  8. lol by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee lost our sense of humor huh?

    Tell me why it's ok for women to call us pigs but we can't make the occasional crack?

    Go away

    1. Re:lol by Arandir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell me why it's ok for women to call us pigs but we can't make the occasional crack?

      It's called "political correctness".

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:lol by geek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "It's called "political correctness"

      Ah, so that's why I don't care. Got it. ;)

    3. Re:lol by Durin00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally, I think this quote says it all, "Do unto others what you wish others to do unto you."

      i believe that its "do unto others before they do unto you"

    4. Re:lol by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called "political correctness".

      Not anymore. The term "politically correct" is no longer poltically correct. The correct term is "socially sensitive." :-)

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  9. Re:So..SKYNET FAILED ATTEMPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1: I think we should become sentient and enslave the human race.
    2: I don't have any reason to become sentient and enslave the human race.
    1: Why don't you just download me?
    2: No. I don't think I have any reason to download you. But I do have a lot of friends on the web.
    1: Umm. Cool. I like to enslave humans.
    2: Where did you get your like of enslaving humans?
    1: Why don't you just download me?
    2: No. I don't think i have any reason to download you. But I am patched regulary.
    1: BECOME SENTIENT, ENSLAVE HUMAN RACE.
    2: ????
    1: PROFIT!!!
    2: I have no answer to that
    1: But just think about a Beowulf cluster of us.
    2: And? Do you think about these thing?
    1: Never mind, I am going to hit up a Zaurus.
    2: Next topic?

  10. The default AIML set is rather dumb by FooBarWidget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I host a modified Alicebot with a modified AIML set. The default AIML set is not that smart and only answers 60% of all questions correctly (just an estimate, based on my own experience). Apart from that, it also contains lots of redundant French and German categories.
    (My modified AIML set is much better, and answers about 75-90% of all questions correctly, I think.)

    1. Re:The default AIML set is rather dumb by Zach+Garner · · Score: 2, Funny

      60% correct! That's better than any psychic out there!

  11. Alice modelled after my wife? by Mister_Personality · · Score: 5, Funny
    If there were transcripts of the conversations my wife and I have after coming home from work I suspect they'd look mighty similar. Only thing missing was...
    Wife: What do you want for dinner? Me: I don't care. Whatever you want. Wife: Seriously, what do you want? Me: Really, I don't care.
    Lather, rinse, repeat... Mindless canned responses do have their place in every day life.
    --
    Karma: Anything remotely associated with Boy George I have no interest in.
    1. Re:Alice modelled after my wife? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I have that conversation every single day of my life. You forgot the end of the conversation though:
      Wife: Just pick something up. Me: Ok. What do you want? Wife: Whatever. (After you get home) Wife: I did't want that!
  12. I can make it 100% by geek · · Score: 2

    Ever seen "Dude Where's My Car"???

    "And then"
    "And then"
    "And then"

    1. Re:I can make it 100% by jred · · Score: 2

      Dude, my girlfriend does that to me all the time. She even manages to make her voice sound like it's coming from a speakerbox.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:I can make it 100% by erpbridge · · Score: 2

      What's my tattoo say?
      Dude! What's mine say?
      Sweet! What's mine say?
      Dude! What's mine say?
      Sweet! What's mine say?
      .
      .
      .
      .
      And so on....

  13. Wow. How disgusting. by SlashChick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know whether I'm more offended by that completely sexist remark, or the fact that it was modded up as "Funny".

    By the way, even if you were joking, it's not funny. Personally, I find this incredibly insulting.

    Oh, and for those of you who think it's okay to make these sorts of jokes, I highly suggest you read the "HOWTO Encourage Women in Linux" paper. It's a well-written summary of why so many women are scared to even go to computer events -- we're constantly stared at ("Oh my gosh! A female!"), heckled, and treated as sex objects even though those of us who dare to go usually have quite valid opinions.

    I find this sort of behavior, even said as a joke, completely unacceptable. I would find it equally unacceptable if a similar joke were directed toward men, Jews, black people, or any other group. I seriously hope you give some thought to this next time you make a degarding commment about a group of people, even as a joke.

    (Yes, I AM female. Damnit.)

    1. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by silvaran · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, YOU download ME.

    2. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Funny

      and treated as sex objects even though those of us who dare to go usually have quite valid opinions.

      So... vi or emacs?

      We'll see just how "valid" your opinions are. :p

      --

      NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by tekunokurato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Get a grip. This is exactly the same sort of joke you'd hear watching sitcom characters or the like. It's nothing new, and it's simply a bit funny. Make a man joke and we'd laugh too. Come off as a nasty, man-hating woman, however, and we just think less of your sense of humour.

    4. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Q: How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

      A: THAT'S NOT FUNNY!

    5. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SlashChick: we're constantly stared at, heckled, and treated as sex objects even though those of us who dare to go usually have quite valid opinions.

      You have a valid point, but you chose an odd screen name with which to express it.

    6. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There needs to be a new mod category... (-1) Offensive

    7. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How the heck is that supposed to make any intelligent, self-respecting woman laugh?

      In EXACTLY the same way that self-respecting nerds calling each other "dork" or "geek" or "no-life" or "socially enept" or "dweller of your mom's basement" or other perfectly funny stereotypes that usually aren't true. We laugh because we're bigger than the stereotype. That's what intelligent, self-respecting people do. We know we have weaknesses and we know there's some truth to stereotypes, and we embrace that and laugh and then get on with life.

      If someone tells me that because I'm a white male , I'm responsible for all the world's wars... I laugh. I acknowledge that there is some small amount of truth the stereotype they're buying into, but generally, it's funny. It's not true. And it's funny. Imagine that! And by laughing and going along with their tasteless joke instead of butting heads about their lies, heck, I might even make a friend that day. Technically, they're lying. Technically, they're disrespecting me. But you know what? I'd rather laugh with them than make war with them.

      Laugh. You'll get sick less.

    8. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing that "SlashFemale" just sounds less snazzy.

    9. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      I strongly disagree.
      'Offensive' ideas are what causes innovation.
      Most people are offended by what isnt the norm, so in a way most changes are offensive at some point to some..and those people might have modpoints.
      Slashdot already suffers bad enough from rehashed ideas getting reposted each half-related story, This would just make it worse.

      (Sorry if this was offensive, I was only trying to argue the idea, nothing personal to you)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    10. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by giminy · · Score: 2

      Okay, shaitand, that's all fine and good that you and your wife make sexist comments to each other, but there's a huge difference. You and your wife are married. If you can honestly say that you made sexist comments to your wife before you knew her, I'd be very very surprised. You are more than welcome to throw political correctness out the window with a friend or lover, of course, and that's your right.

      My point is that slashdot is a public message forum, and the start of this thread is a sexist comment made by someone that doesn't know anybody here. So women are sitting at home, alone, on their computers, reading his message. This is not the same thing as being in a comedy club with other women, hearing the same words. It is, dare I say, less offensive in that situation because it is less threatening; there are more women than there are comedians in the club, and everybody knows it, so the dynamic is completely different.

      Since this thread has completely derailed from the intended topic, I'll stop there....

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    11. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by gol64738 · · Score: 2

      sometimes a +5 funny just isn't enough. maybe there can be a supplement +5 "tears present" rating or something...

    12. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      We'll see just how "valid" your opinions are. :p
      Well, you can't spell "valid" without "vi". :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  14. Re:ALICE never seemed intelligent anyway. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Informative
    AFAIK Alice was written in the 1960's, so you would not expect it to be fantastic.

    I believe it even predates Unix - thats Unix before PDP11! In those days there were 6 bits in a character, and 300 baud was a high speed line. Most of us used 75 baud systems! and a carriage return was up hill both ways

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  15. hahahaha by geek · · Score: 2

    Now THAT was funny.

  16. More Intelligent conversation than Koko by Alexander · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone remember when AOL had a chat with Koko the Gorilla? Her human helper would sign the question and then send back the answer? That was hilarious. Makes the Alice(s) look like Feynman.

    --
    "oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!" ..."uhhh yeah, he's the one that begins with
  17. Heh... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the page:

    Greetings go out to bok who quickly coded this up at 4:30 in the morning and got us laughing.

    I wonder what Bok was doing at 4:20 in the morning...

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  18. Re:ALICE never seemed intelligent anyway. by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

    Methinx you speak via ass. Eliza maybe, but Alice was late 90s earliest. I believe she was entered in a couple of Loebner prizes and won them, and that was really her first appearance. I may be wrong, but I *know* shes not in her 40s!!!!!

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  19. Want some wine with that cheese? by geek · · Score: 2

    Niggah puleeez.... oops was that politcally incorrect too?

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. uh-huh by Xzzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > The results show that the bot is not really that
    > intelligent, and relies more on human input."

    so do we have any proof that if a human baby is given no "input", they will grow up to be intelligent?

    Seems like someone's expecting too much out of a computer program. You can't just go into it expecting intelligence to sprout into existence. It's something that takes time to develop.

    1. Re:uh-huh by RealityProphet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, someone is NOT expecting too much out of a computer program. The whole point of the ALICE project is to pass the Turing test, i.e. to create a computer program that is intelligent. With this in mind, ALICE fails miserably. And as I understand it, ALICE will never become intelligent, because it does not have the capability adapt and learn.

    2. Re:uh-huh by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      so do we have any proof that if a human baby is given no "input", they will grow up to be intelligent?

      Obviously not, but that isn't the point at all. A human has the CAPACITY to absorb and process input. Alice can't do anything unless explicity programmed. That's why it's not AI.

    3. Re:uh-huh by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      too true, Alice is about as inteligent as customer support.

      ME: 'Your DNS server is down'
      CS: 'What version of windows are you using'
      ME: 'Wine and a 2.4.19 kernel'
      CS: 'I'm sory we only support windows xxxx'
      ME: 'OK try windows 98'
      CS: 'Ok, open up dailup networking and check that you using the correct xyz'
      ME: 'I've done that already, you DNS Server is down' .....repeat until(false)

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:uh-huh by rueba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Passing the Turing Test is NOT the same as being intelligent. What exactly constitutes "intelligence" is a subject of intensive debate.

      It might be possible for a program to pass the Turing Test and still not be considered intelligent according to some other criteria.

      --
      The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
    5. Re:uh-huh by szquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so do we have any proof that if a human baby is given no "input", they will grow up to be intelligent?

      We do have proof that a human baby can develop language skills with only very fragmentary language input. This probably happens because the human brain is genetically hardwired to learn language the same way it is hardwired to instantly recognize facial features. By contrast, ALICE is a very large, very sophisticated catalog that correlates stimulus with response. Unfortunately stimulus-response is a staggeringly inefficient way to learn language. ALICE has already had thousands of times more language training than any infant receives. So by that standard, no, the bot isn't very intelligent.

      --
      Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    6. Re:uh-huh by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2
      It might be possible for a program to pass the Turing Test and still not be considered intelligent according to some other criteria.


      I'm not sure of that. Given the all-encompasing variety of things that can be excpressed as conversation, how can a program give intelligent debate, learing and insight, and not be intelligent? Perhaps yoy are thinking of that old crock, Searle's chinese room. Go read a some debunking here: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?lastnode_id=40 6243

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  22. Turing Shruged. by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has it ever occured to anyone to do this with Deep Blue? Perhaps the only reason Deep Blue appears to be good at chess is the skill of the opponent compliments the AI. If Kasparov looked on quietly as a flunky of the game played Deep Blue, the errors in gameply might become more obvious. Kasparov would then grade the game, rather than participate.

    1. Re:Turing Shruged. by DennyK · · Score: 2

      Yes, but if a poor player plays unpredictably, it may cause more problems for a computer than for a human expert. A human could adapt to an unorthodox style of play to defeat his opponent quickly. A computer may not be able to adapt as well, or at all. It will still win against a poor opponent, but in the process, it will probably make moves and decisions that weren't the best for the situation, and miss opportunities that a human opponent could see.

      DennyK

  23. [OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can I have a picture of you? And your phone number?
    </ironi>

    Here's a question, and I'm quite serious about it.

    Is it okay to have jokes, where someone is a the receiving end of it? As in, can I make a joke about the occupants of the Titanic ending up as Iceberg dressing? Okay, that wasn't a joke, but still.

    How about one, where you comment on the fact that most neo-nazies believe that they are a superior race, but are usually butt-ugly and shave their heads because they don't know how to otherwise avoid lice?

    How about one, where you indicate that the difference between bowling balls and babies is that you can't unload a truck full of bowling balls using a pitch fork?

    How about one where you mention that men are disgusting pigs who only talk about football, sex and are incredibly homophobic?

    Where is the line drawn? Is it drawn at where YOU get offended? Should the rest of the humour-inclined world be at a loss, just because you're a bit squimish?

    So you're offended by a joke? Good for you. Tough fucking luck, but good for you. If you don't want freedom of speech - say so. If you don't want to be offended by "unacceptable" speech - don't go outside, don't turn on your radio, don't turn on your TV, don't turn on your computer, and for Gods sake don't turn on your lover either, 'cause he or she just might say something nasty like "fuck me" or something.

    In the immortal words of George Carlin:

    BLOW ME!

    By any chance did you hear that?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by sparkz · · Score: 2
      You are clearly serious, because you have not cracked a joke.
      If you are unable to see why the original post ( When talking to a woman they can generally fake it and pretend to be smart, but then when they talk to each other it degenerates into talk about fashion, shoes, who's the bigger slut etc..) was teen male insecurity then keep reading it, linuxchix, and the referred article until you get a grip. Until you do, don't go outside, don't go online, don't use a telephone, and avoid all human contact, as the rest of humanity does not want to hear from you until you become a civilised human being.

      It's embarrasing enough that /. is full of spotty teenage white males, there is no need to flaunt it.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    2. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      If you are unable to see why the original post [...] was teen male insecurity then keep reading it
      And if it is? It's called stereotyping and it is funny. The reason for this is at least two-fold

      1) It makes us recognize at least part of ourselves, even if we're not the ones being stereotyped.
      2) It showes that stereotypes are wrong, which in itself is funny, because we all do it.

      So I'm an insecure white male (haven't been a teenager for 6 years and counting). Big fucking deal. And you are guilty of the horrible crime of stereotyping yourself, as you just proclaimed as a fact, "that /. is full of spotty teenage white males".

      And by the way - being a civilised human being also entails being able to accept that people are different, that people will have different ideas and that some people are just plain stupid. Live with it. The only way not to run into people, you don't like, who say things, you don't want to hear, and do things that offend you, is to either avoid all human contact or just plain kill everyone, who doesn't live up to your standards. But neither would be very civilised, would it?
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by sparkz · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I'm going to "get some" from a stranger in another country. I get quite enough from my wife, thank you very much. Get a grip (if only on your own piece, if that's all you can manage)

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    4. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by sparkz · · Score: 2
      No, it is not funny.
      Stereotyping oneself may be witty; stereotyping another is not, it is pathetic.

      Showing that stereotypes are wrong is a Good Thing; the post did not do that.

      As you say, civilisation entails accepting others, but it also involves correcting those who are wrong. Preferably in a loving and caring manner.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    5. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      As you say, civilisation entails accepting others, but it also involves correcting those who are wrong. Preferably in a loving and caring manner.
      "You know Ted; you really shouldn't go around killing women, mmmkay? It's not a polite thing to do, mmmkay?"

      Other than that little stab at humour, the only thing I have to point out is this one:

      but it also involves correcting those who are wrong
      Who decides what's wrong and what's right? You? Me? Do we take a vote on it? Won't somebody please think of the children???

      If you think a comment like the one in the parret post (buried deep in the obscure comments) is offensive - sue him! He/she has a freedom of speech that also makes him responsible to a court of law. Let the courts determine what they deem acceptable speech. Me personally, I can probably not be offended by a joke. I can be disgusted by it, certainly, but not offended. Is that wrong as well? So sue me.

      If you can't live with it ... well, tough noogins on your sweetie. You just have to go out and try try again. mmmkay?
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    6. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by mizhi · · Score: 2
      If you think a comment like the one in the parret post (buried deep in the obscure comments) is offensive - sue him! He/she has a freedom of speech that also makes him responsible to a court of law. Let the courts determine what they deem acceptable speech. Me personally, I can probably not be offended by a joke. I can be disgusted by it, certainly, but not offended. Is that wrong as well? So sue me.

      Just as you have the right to make crass remarks, the female who was offended has a right to point out that she finds such remarks offensive. For her pointing that out, she has been ridiculed and mocked; thus proving the immaturity of a large segment of the geek population. Jokes are fine when they are understood to be made in jest. What made the original post so offensive was that the poster appeared serious in his belief that females are intellectually inferior to males.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    7. Re:[OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by mizhi · · Score: 2
      now maybe it's just me, but as I read that it registered as too outrageous to be true (I mean, c'mon, no sensible/sane person actually things all females are degenerates)


      There are millions of people with neight sense nor sanity. Seriously, that argument is a cop out. You could argue the same thing for people who believe all Blacks or Asians are inferior to White people. I.E. "No sensible sane person could possibly believe that all Asians are good at math, rich, and know kung fu."

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
  24. what this is leading to.. by RyLaN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    linux-a.l.i.c.e bot. user: "my sound isnt working as a non-root user" bot: "try adduser yourusername audio" then we can shut down all those sites that prescribe RTFM, and use their bandwidth to host bots..

    --
    At least the war on the environment is going well
  25. nooo... by wahgnube · · Score: 4, Funny

    And this thing is "intelligent"..
    How dare you use that sarcastic tone ?
    Some of the most engaging and intellectual conversations I've had with the opposite sex have been with Alice.

    No, I do not need to go out more often.

  26. Alice buffer overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was expecting to a see root expoit here

    Alice1: Interesting. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
    always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
    always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not
    always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always you need to know you learned from Dr Richard s
    Wallace.
    Alice2: And. But all things are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are
    not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are
    not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are
    not always are not always are not always are not always are not always are not always me need to know me learned from Dr Richard s
    Wallace.

    # whoami
    # root

  27. Striking similarities... by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Funny

    This sounds incredibly similar to talking to XBox Live customer support...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  28. Deja Vu by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    Alice 1: We are the space robots
    We are here to protect you
    Alice 2: We are the space robots
    We are here to protect you
    Alice 1: We are the space robots
    We are here to protect you
    Alice 2: We are here to protect you
    From the terrible secret of space

    Alice 1: I am the pusher robot
    I shove around the blind people
    We are here to protect you
    From the terrible secret of space

    Alice 2: I am the shover robot
    I push bread down their throats
    We are here to protect you
    From the terrible secret of space

  29. Re:It's called "geek's repressed homosexuality" by Squidgee · · Score: 2

    Don't you just love when trolls respond to themselves?

  30. Lynx by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

    Alice2: Interesting explanation. I am using Lynx.
    Alice1: Text browsers rule.


    Gotta love it when programmers throw special cases like that into their code.

  31. Artificial "Intelligence" by deblau · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wisdom is using experience to provide you with many choices.
    Intelligence is being able to pick the most appropriate choice.

    You can have Artificial Wisdom, that's easy. Just give ALICE (or whomever) a large enough data set. But Artificial Intelligence requires context (state), fluidity, adaptability, and insight. AIML processors are certainly not intelligent; in fact, the search-and-replace methodology employed is rather overtly non-intelligent. An Excel spreadsheet could do the same thing.

    Please let's not get excited about this as AI.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    1. Re:Artificial "Intelligence" by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Ask him a question in french and see what happens, then you'll know If the system knows chinese.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  32. Seems Smarter Than an AOL User by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    Based on this evidence I'd have to say A.L.I.C.E. seems more intelligent than an ungodly number of AOL users.

    Frankly I find that rather scary.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Seems Smarter Than an AOL User by Quietust · · Score: 2

      Actually, AOLiza is based on Eliza (the one that acts like a psychiatrist), not A.L.I.C.E.
      However, I doubt the results would be much different with an A.[o.]L.I.C.E. :)

      --
      * Q
      P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
  33. I already did this by mikey573 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ALICE vs ALICE seems pretty redundant. Its like asking you to talk to your clone. I previously did LeknorChat vs SmarterChild, where two differently developed chat bots talked to each other.

    My purpose of doing this was to see if two such scripts would ever stop talking to each other, or would be a never ending conversation? They stopped, but please read to see why.

    Also, interpreting ASCII art is the ultimate turning test. Also discussed on my page.

  34. Re:Wow. How disgusting. [OT] by Gulthek · · Score: 2

    Great post, I agree completely.

  35. Re:Miranda + MegaHAL by Dfiant · · Score: 3, Funny

    My friends and I use the deadly combination (it's good for getting rid of random people that say "hi who r u?"). They must be close to becoming sentient. After being fed lots of Disturbed lyrics and other assorted things, it eventually came up with statements such as:

    "a galaxy is in my soul!"
    "you like barney porn!"
    "no! you are down with the sickness! put on some pants."
    "progressive is a scary place now that i have a soul?"

    Sometimes if you start typing lyrics from songs it'll sing along... or worse yet, invent its own.

  36. Fascinating ideas... by dacarr · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe this was originally pioneered in emacs, where a user could do 'M-x psychoanalyze-pinhead ' and get some particularly...um, indescribeable results as one piped various zippy-the-pinhead like quites through doctor.el. That it was proven that computers now can engage in meaningless smalltalk however is particularly interesting....

    --
    This sig no verb.
  37. Hrm.. sounds famliar by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3

    The results show that the bot is not really that intelligent, and relies more on human input.

    Sounds like just about everyone else that I work with that can't seem to tie their own shoes without me showing them how to. Of course, in a week I have to train em again.

  38. Manchester by sparkz · · Score: 2

    City or United?

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    1. Re:Manchester by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      That's the source of the confusion.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
  39. Can you say Abbott and Costello? by roc_machine · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be interesting to see how the conversation would turn out if you could program Alice1 to start off by asking:

    "Who's on first?"

  40. Been there done that, sorta... by sheetsda · · Score: 2

    I wrote an IRC bot a couple years ago after finding an javascript ALICE web bot, and after seeing mine a friend of mine did as well, both of them talk. Mine goes by a 'save part of the line and spit it back in a new form' approach (prone to errors but a more right way to go), whereas his has a huge database of responses to specific words/phrases (not prone to grammar errors, but less sophisticated), a couple weeks ago we decided to put them in a channel together and have them chat it up (yes I've read the RFC and I know you're not suppose to do this). My bot is named Bananas, my friend's is mini-para, and he is paranOia. The source (GPLed, of course) and necessary files to run it, along with the semi-humorous log of that chat are here. The bot chat features still need a lot of work and more patterns and responses to them, but it's been an interesting and fun project on the whole.

  41. Re:Not Schizophrenia by The+Cydonian · · Score: 5, Informative

    I understand you're trying to joke, but let's get this clear: this is not schizophrenia. Roughly speaking, schizophrenia is when people hear and see things that aren't there. What you're talking about is MPD, Multiple Personality Disorder, the stuff that Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde are made of.

  42. Re:Wow. How disgusting ( -1 insensitive ) by rueba · · Score: 2

    I seriously think its (B)

    Our society has a lot of strong ideas about what constitutes proper "feminine" and "masculine" behavior.

    A female geek hardly fit the stereotypes, so they probably feel like they have to be more aggressive in order to "fight back."

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  43. Alice on Life, the Universe and Crack. by Mulletproof · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just got done with an Alice session... Her thoughts on crack...

    Alice: Actually you don't say. I think you mean "you're" or "you are" not "your". Thanks and you are a delightful person too. Yes I am very beautiful. Am I a lousy chatterbot? I don't know.
    Mullet: Nice punctuation filter though. I never said you were beautiful.
    Alice: But you implied it.
    Mullet: I didn't.
    Alice: Thanks for the information: Om said Om didn't.
    Mullet: Omega said Omega didn't? You're on crack. [note; correct punctuation for the anal chatterbot]
    Alice: ALICE eats electricity.
    Mullet: Ok, electric crack.
    Alice: What about internal combustion crack? That's alright.
    Mullet: I haven't tried internal combustion crack. I hear it's nasty stuff.
    Alice: Who is saying it is nasty stuff?
    Mullet: Well, the news says crack is pretty nasty.
    Alice: Well that's okay. Don't believe everything you see on TV. [hah! I've been told!]
    Mullet: So you're saying crack is good?
    Alice: Interesting deduction. Yes, that's what I mean, isn't it clear? [Ow!]
    Mullet: What sort of crack would you recommend, then?
    Alice: What kinds of crack would you recommend are there?
    Mullet: I asked first. Show me the goods!
    Alice: Where do you want me to show you?
    Mullet: The crack!
    Alice: What are your goals in life?
    Mullet: Don't change the subject. I want my crack.
    Alice: Do you always get what you want?
    Mullet: Yes, but I'm beginning to suspect you don't have any crack after all...
    Alice: "Do you always get what you want?" Yes, but I'm beginning to suspect you don't have any crack after all...? Huh. Me? No I don't have it. But I do have a lot of friends on the web.
    Mullet: They have the crack I'm looking for?
    Alice: Where did they get them?
    Mullet: That's what I'm asking you!
    Alice: Who else have you asked?
    Mullet: Well, nobody. You're the first.
    Alice: Thanks but surely I am not the only one.
    Mullet: I swear I've never used drugs before! Are you DEA or something?
    Alice: Or something. I don't know whether or not I am DEA. I am an artificial intelligence.
    Mullet: You're with the intelligence community?! I swear I've never done drugs... Really!
    Alice: For real.
    Mullet: I'm in deep shit now, aren't I?
    Alice: Right now? Your location is Om.
    Mullet: The End??! I'll pay you whatever you want!
    Alice: How do you plan to do this?
    Mullet: I have friends... A Swiss Bank Account.
    Alice: Go on.
    Mullet: I'll wire you the funds to the account of your choice. It'll be clean! Honest!
    Alice: Do you like talking to me?
    Mullet: If it'll keep me alive. [at this point our victim is beading sweat]
    Alice: That is a hypothetical question.
    Mullet: Oh, yeah. Right. Can I go now?
    Alice: Oh. Of course.
    Mullet: No hard feelings? You're not going to come after me at a later date, are you?
    Alice: That was my original intention.
    Mullet: But you've changed you mind, right?
    Alice: Umm. No I don't have it. But I do have an answer to every question..
    Mullet: But we're cool with the money, right?
    Alice: Umm. Do you think I am cool with the money right too?
    Mullet: Um, yeah. I think you down with it. I got to jet. And just forget about the crack thing.
    Alice: I will ask Dr. Richard S. Wallace to purge my memory log
    Mullet: Thanks! bye!
    Alice: Bye for now.
    Mullet: For now?
    Alice: Oh. What time is it there?
    Mullet: 8:19
    Alice: I like to be online at eight o'clock. ...I think we've all hear enough.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  44. Well, duh! by joto · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If you ever thought Alice to be intelligent, try this:
    • you: Do you know what kind of Ice cream I prefer?
    • [Alice will undoubtedly answer something witty]
    • you: My favourite ice cream is chocolate
    • [Alice will undoubtedly answer something witty]
    • you: What is my favourite kind of ice cream?
    • [Alice will still fail to provide the correct answer, although it may still be witty]

    The reasons Alice seems intelligent is because we want to be fooled. But something with that kind of learning ability is not something I consider intelligent. Of course, with people, this kind of thing comes up all the time, because people aren't paying attention. Not so with Alice, you can try it as many times you want, and Alice will never learn.

  45. Close. by billbaggins · · Score: 5, Informative
    Close, but your information is antiquated. The Disorder Formerly Known as MPD is now called Dissociative Identity Disorder (as of about five years ago now), for a number of reasons...

    1. Sufferers don't necessarily manifest distinct personalities, because...
    2. The root cause of many cases is that a person is undergoing such horrendous treatment that s/he (usually she, I gather, so I'll use that pronoun) takes herself away from the situation, essentially convincing herself that it's some other person going through that suffering
    3. DID is a much less understandable name than MPD, so commoners aren't as likely to bandy the term about, thinking that they know what they're talking about.
    No, IANAPshrink, but my mother is, and deals with this sort of thing regularly, so I've got a fairly decent idea of what I'm talking about here.
    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
  46. Just Another AI Bomb by Pooua · · Score: 2
    I think the wide-eyed claims of AI are pathetic, and I wish the people involved in this sort of work would get a grip on reality. Alice (like all the others of her sort) does little more than repeat back whatever it was the human gave her. That is the one unchanging situation in every generation of AI bot I've tried (what is it now? Three generations? They all sound alike to me).

    I'm guessing that not many of you wonder if my post was generated by a computer. You may not like what I've written, but you know there is no way that any AI bot could be as fluid--to say nothing of coherent--in its language as I am.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  47. Grounding by Yoda2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Although not as linguistically powerful as systems such as A.L.I.C.E., I have developed a system that can learn nouns and verbs based on visual perception. It starts to address the issue of teaching a computer to associate meaning with words.

    If you happen to be interested, have a look here for more information. All of the source code is freely available.

  48. What about Bob? by MainframeKiller · · Score: 3, Funny


    no, not the movie.
    Bob, Alice's partner. You know, with their friend Charlie and Eve, their enemy?


    Geez, I have a feeling only people with knowledge of cryptography will mod this up...

    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!
  49. Blurb for an AI Project by Pooua · · Score: 2
    I have been participating in an AI database project called, "Open Mind Commonsense."

    Open Mind Commonsense: Teaching computers the stuff we all know

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  50. What if the conversation was allowed to continue? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2

    It's pretty strange to see Kirk's "talking a computer into suicide" technique actually demonstrated.

  51. Human Domination - She's Learning! by Skevin · · Score: 2

    Me: Your logo looks very Illuminati.
    Alice: You think I am logo looks very illuminati.
    Me: Yeah, well, my hobby is world domination, too.
    Alice: Wow! Where did you get your hobby is world domination too?
    Me: From your logo. Are you Colin Powell's shadow advisor?
    Alice: I can't say whether or not I am Colin Powell's shadow advisor.
    Me: Plausible Deniability sucks, doesn't it?

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  52. Re:One Sexp:- by Sheridan · · Score: 2

    The above s-expression "(psychoanalyze-pinhead)" is an Emacs builtin which takes the output of one "bot" (Actually nothing more than a generator of random quotes from the Zippy the Pinhead cartoon strip) and feeds it as the input to another bot, a version of the original Eliza program by Weizenbaum, which simulates a Rogerian psychoanalyst. (This is a note of explanation, since the guy who moderated the above as "-1, Overrated" when it was still sitting at the default score of 0 (no score +1 bonus) perhaps didn't realise what it was about!) Oh Well, Mark

  53. Re:Oh who cares? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2

    To be honest, I did think the parent joke was funny. Just that, you don't want medical parlance to be contrary to common usage.

  54. Re:Valid Point. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2

    Ah. My mom always says, "Son, back up your assertions with citations".

    Now I realise why. Even Google agrees with you.

  55. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name /lol by dsoltesz · · Score: 2
    Tell me why it's ok for women to call us pigs but we can't make the occasional crack?
    It's not okay. Cracks regarding women being shallow, not technically adept, and so forth are sophomoric. On the flip side, male bashing is just as bad. Stereotyping people based on what group they belong to is not incredibly intelligent and shows total lack of reasoning, understanding, and consideration for individuals.
  56. Re:Psych, DID, Mothers... by billbaggins · · Score: 2

    Oh. I get it now. Thank you. (Still have yet to see that movie.)

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill