Slashdot Mirror


ZDNet Australia Interviews Richard Alston

ynotds writes "ZDNet Australia has an interview with notorious Australian IT Minister Senator Richard Alston which could even be read as suggesting that he, like some others in the Australian government, has learned a little about his portfolio during his 7 years at the helm. He responds openly about his censorhip regime, lack of action against spam and his antipathy towards Electronic Frontiers Australia but refuses to get into details on cyberterrorism response and security expenditure."

138 comments

  1. Alston's an Idiot by laptop006 · · Score: 2

    But it's actually a hard job with the consumers wanting the impossible ("It must be our RIGHT to have FREE UNLIMITED broadband") and the telco's & ISP's (unsurprisingly) unwilling to give it.

    --
    /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    1. Re:Alston's an Idiot by darkov · · Score: 2

      But it's actually a hard job with the consumers wanting the impossible ("It must be our RIGHT to have FREE UNLIMITED broadband")

      Exactly, who ever heard of something really useful that benefits the community, but expensive, being available for free. Like free roads. Or free education. Or free healthcare.

    2. Re:Alston's an Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I recall paying for all of these roads and my education. Fancy that.
      Now who has ever heard of free taxes? I want some of those.

    3. Re:Alston's an Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what your parent poster was suggesting was: partially fund broadband provision from taxes. That's something that this Alston guy could look at.

    4. Re:Alston's an Idiot by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, who ever heard of something really useful that benefits the community, but expensive, being available for free. Like free roads. Or free education. Or free healthcare.

      Free electricity? Nope.

      Free telephones? Nope.

      Free air conditioning? Nope.

      Nothing is free; it all has to be paid for somewhere. All the things you mentioned are paid for, by the taxpayer. The only people clamouring for anything "free" are the ones who have made the deliberate decision that taxpayer-funding will result in them getting more from the system than they have contributed, i.e. they want their personal luxuries to be subsidized by other people's work.

    5. Re:Alston's an Idiot by tconnors · · Score: 2

      But it's actually a hard job with the consumers wanting the impossible ("It must be our RIGHT to have FREE UNLIMITED broadband")

      Exactly, who ever heard of something really useful that benefits the community, but expensive, being available for free. Like free roads. Or free education. Or free healthcare.


      Yeah. Roads are fairly essential. Edumacation is pretty darn essential for a working society. Healthcare is essential (even if American's don't think so). I think broadband is in a different category. I certainly don't want to pay for your pr0n viewing pleasures with _my_ taxes.
    6. Re:Alston's an Idiot by darkov · · Score: 2

      I certainly don't want to pay for your pr0n viewing pleasures with _my_ taxes.

      You're starting to sound a bit like Mr. Alston. Keep in mind that roads, education, healthcare, etc all indirectly contribute to the manufacture and delivery of porn. Your taxes have already paid for other people's pleasure.

    7. Re:Alston's an Idiot by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      And those who genuinely think it's in everyone's best interests.

    8. Re:Alston's an Idiot by rtscts · · Score: 1
      the decision that taxpayer-funding will result in them getting more from the system than they have contributed, i.e. they want their personal luxuries to be subsidized by other people's work.
      Crap. Having the Govt operate essential services means we're getting as close to 1:1 ratio between cash in and service out as possible (efficiency does suffer because there's no major incentive to make a profit; breaking even is sufficient). In the private sector, a small group of fuckwit executives and thousands of whining shareholders skim billions off the top and hoard it, benifiting nobody but themselves at the expense of a captive market.
  2. You guys, you guys! by netsharc · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what I just heard? ZDNet Australia has an interview with notorious Australian IT Minister Senator Richard Alston which could even be read as suggesting that he, like some others in the Australian government, has learned a little about his portfolio during his 7 years at the helm. He responds openly about his censorhip regime, lack of action against spam and his antipathy towards Electronic Frontiers Australia but refuses to get into details on cyberterrorism response and security expenditure.

    Go read it!

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:You guys, you guys! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      If only I had some mod points...

      And whoever rated that redundant apparently hasn't kept up with the latest in Slashdot posting styles. :)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:You guys, you guys! by kubrick · · Score: 2

      censorhip regime

      Hey, if you're going to post a dupe, at least do the editing that the Slashdot editors can't be bothered doing. :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  3. amazing... by Gavin+Rogers · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Considering the drivel Alston normally comes up with, this interview seemed to be quite good. Anyone involved in the Australian IT and/or telecommunications industry would be honestly shocked and amazed that Senator Alston even knew what 'spam' was! (even if he still doesn't read his own email)

    1. Re:amazing... by darkov · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Australian IT and/or telecommunications industry would be honestly shocked and amazed that Senator Alston even knew what 'spam' was!

      He does: "It's what broadband gives you besides games and pornography."

    2. Re:amazing... by narkotix · · Score: 1

      a quote from the famous comicbook guy: "What the-- the Internet King... I wonder if he can provide faster nudity."

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  4. You'll have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blow up a bomb in a city and combine it with cyber-terrorism and DOS against the local hospital-firestation-police-...
    Somehow doesn't sound that theoretical anymore...

    1. Re:You'll have to admit by RyoSaeba · · Score: 1
      Well, for that to be possible, you have some requirements:
      • hospital / firestation / police are in networks you can hack. Maybe they are connected to the internet, but i sure hope they are securely protected from outside intrusions, or have 2 separate networks (internal & external)
      • assuming you can hack those networks, you'll need to DOS'em at the same time. Meaning you hafta get ready enough time before the bomb goes off, so you run the risk of someone noticing you 'pre-intrusion'
      • it also assumes hospital / police / firestation can't live without their networks... which is, i hope, partially false. In case of emergency, hopefully people will just use the old (read: pre-network) ways, and get going... maybe slower, but still do respond in some way

      Just my 2 cents of euro...
      --
      Tsuyoikoto ha taisetsu da ne, dakedo namida mo hitsuyousa (Strength is an important thing, but tears too are necessary)
  5. the money by z01d · · Score: 1

    ye, anyone can laugh at him and say: "you stupid.", but he is one of the men who get the real profit. fudge the threat and get the budget, old trick.

  6. GOATSE.CX in parent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't fall for that crap!

  7. Don't know what was worth reading in that by abhikhurana · · Score: 2

    I read the interview, and it was full of nomral political mumbo jumbo. Never say no to anything... just say that we are looking into it or whatever. For example, the pricing and Telstra.... I mean I can't really see what was so newsworthy in it to put it onto slashdot.Slow news day?

    1. Re:Don't know what was worth reading in that by RyoSaeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a few points noting, though. The one i remember on top of my head is about holding the Australian IT industry back. Alston simply points out that apart journalists, presumably in search of subjects to run, were the only ones complaining...
      Apart that, yeah, fairly political thingy...

      --
      Tsuyoikoto ha taisetsu da ne, dakedo namida mo hitsuyousa (Strength is an important thing, but tears too are necessary)
  8. from the article... by newsdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you regret making the comments that broadband in Korea is being driven primarily by demand for porn and games?

    Has nobody told this guy that porn and games drive demand for the Internet in the whole world?

  9. First they ban porn... by MavEtJu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...then they complain about the amount of overseas traffic. Can you add one to one?

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:First they ban porn... by RyoSaeba · · Score: 1

      Wait, the local web site calculator is banned, lemme go check overseas what it amounts to !

      --
      Tsuyoikoto ha taisetsu da ne, dakedo namida mo hitsuyousa (Strength is an important thing, but tears too are necessary)
  10. Slow news day? by newsdee · · Score: 1

    You don't really need to ask that. Just count the dupes.

  11. freedom of speech by katalyst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hypocracy.. why do countries/polititians claim they advocate freedom of speech , when they don't. Certain issues like child pornography and terrorist organizations , I can understand. But, why should they want to censor anything else ? DO they like flexing their political arms,or do they just want to be noticed ? And why drag Korea into all this ? Korean companies anyways have a much stronger global presence than Australian companies.. except for beer ofcourse.... ;)

    --
    |/________
    |\A|ALYS|
    1. Re:freedom of speech by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 1

      Because... the world is grey. It is difficult to define what is "good" and what is "bad" in absolute terms. Different cultures bring more variables in the picture. Somewhere, one has to draw a line and express an opinion, and invite fair debate to make sure we reach a common minimum agreement.

      --
      Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
    2. Re:freedom of speech by darkov · · Score: 2

      Korean companies anyways have a much stronger global presence than Australian companies.. except for beer ofcourse.... ;)

      When was the last time you watched the Simpsons? Next time you do, remeber that it was brought to you by an Australian company...

    3. Re:freedom of speech by katalyst · · Score: 1

      when was the last time you drove an australian car or used an australian manufactured home appliance ? LG, Samsung, Daewoo, Goldstar are all Korean companies. They may not be the largest, but Australian companies can't stand up to these cos. BUT Fosters(australian for beer)...has gr8 market presence.. no denying cheers

      --
      |/________
      |\A|ALYS|
    4. Re:freedom of speech by darkov · · Score: 2

      I use Australian appliances every day. And no, we don't have a competetive advantage in cars and such. But Foster's and beer isn't really the best example. Southcorp does much bigger business in the US with brands such as Rosemont wine. Fosters just had some commercials that everybody remebers.

    5. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Australian, I drive an Australian car, buy Australian furniture and use Japanese electronics.

      But I don't think I have ever bought Fosters in Australia under any circumstances. I only know one person who has ever bought it and everyone there complained and ridiculed him.

      After you get past the marketing propoganda, "Fosters is Australian for that crap we export."

    6. Re:freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... interesting, except that America isn't the world. Australia specializes mainly in primary industry, producing the raw materials that you consume in your TVs and cars. Our primary export markets revolve around Japan and parts of Asia.

      Note that this is mainly for export. The stuff we build, we keep for ourselves, because mainstream imported goods are generally inferior.

      If you really want it pointed out, we export the leftovers and crap we don't want. Australia has more than enough production capacity and resources to be totally independant and still export. We don't, global markets do bring the occasional innovation </sarcasm>.

  12. No action against spam .... ??? by LL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd just like to point out the National Office of Information Economy Interim Report on Spam

    National Office of Information Economy,
    The Spam Problem and How it can be Countered - Interim Report
    , Aug 2002,
    [pdf]

    While it is tempting to legislate Unsolicited Bulk Email out of existance (e.g. EU eCommerce directives), I think it might be better in the long-term for the governments to recognise the quasi-tribunal measures the private sector is establishing (SPEWS, RBL, etc). There's a test case in Perth at the moment (http://t3-v-mcnicol.org) which the government could take note of and if it gets to the appeal stage, might lead to de jure recognition of SPEWS and other abatement measures.

    LL

  13. Re:mirror by MonTemplar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two points:

    (1) The site is ZDNet *Australia*, so there's going to be a delay getting their pages.

    (2) If you're going to post the contents of another web page here, make sure you include the *formatting*, otherwise you might as well have hammered your keyboard randomly for 10 minutes.

    --
    -MT.
  14. Quick summary by ihowson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Alston is still a tool. Telstra still blows.

    Alston's opinion on broadband in Australia seems to be "we're doing better than other places". That's not necessarily a good thing. People aren't going to start taking advantage of it until it gets cheap and ubiquitous, and it's not going to get cheap and ubiquitous until lots of people start using it.

  15. Moderators on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this moderated down? It's absolutely true. The nation of Australia is a 3rd world country with a nearly 1st world living standard. Why? Because first world regions (Western Europe and North America) choose to import Australia's products (mainly argicultural) over the comparable products of many 3rd world nations. North America, Western Europe, and Japan (whose citizens invest millions in property and business in Australia) are holding up the Australian economy. Australia is lumped in with 1st world countries, but if you compare real 1st world economies with Australia's economy, (Australia's) just looks silly.

    1. Re:Moderators on crack? by narkotix · · Score: 1

      mate uve got more screws loose than my vcr in the workshop! If you had noticed anything we actually have one of the most STRONGEST economies in the world. Unlike the good ol` US of A, our economy is growing, not shrinkin coz of good oleee geeeorge dubya bush! Heck atleast we can say we have a car industry, a thriving health system, low crime(much less lunatic to high-school shooting ratio), a drought tolerant system in place for our farmers (which incidentely we're actually going thru a drought). Heck us aussies supported you in afghanistan...with our meagre 3rd world SAS troops which kick ass! now for a 3rd world country with a better education system that doesnt preference those with money or sporting abilities, but more those with intellectual abilities im pretty sure that going by all these facts that you sir are a TOOL who dont know shyte! hehe ;P

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    2. Re:Moderators on crack? by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say our SAS are 3rd world. They are actually pretty good and any US military personnel who were in or around afghanistan actually have a lot of respect for them.
      From what I've heard, the US navy reckon they are cool because they were calling for airstrikes all over the place.
      They were the poor bastards who had to go in and light up the targets. It wasn't too bad for them considering that the majority of Australia is similar climate wise.

      As for having an education system that doesn't prefer athletes or rich pricks, you must be one of those city snobs or at least are closer to "civilisation" than I am, as a geek I was on the absolute bottom of the food chain at school, a total nobody, it is only a handful of teachers that actually notice. Times are changing though, even if it is slow going.

  16. personally... by acehole · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dont like him, he's doing nothing but damage to the net services in australia. The government is pushing to privitize the largest telecommunications company 'telstra', so what you might ask?

    Well for regional centres the access to broadband is less than adequate and if it is pushed to be a private enterprise company then the new owners might not bother with the regional centres because of the cost involved.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:personally... by anandsr · · Score: 1

      Well think about it once telstra is privatised, then they can allow other private companies in the field. I think this is the normal method otherwise the government enterprise bogs down any new companies that you want to bring. That's what was being done by DOT in India before they were split into several parts and privatised. Now I think things will be better in India.

    2. Re:personally... by cranos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Umm, why does telecommunications have to privatised in the first place? It is an essential piece of infrastructure and one of the very few government bodies actually bringing any money in outside of the Tax Office.

      There is a reason why Alston is known as the village idiot and thats because he really has no clue about the industry he is supposed to be overseeing.

      That was such a piss weak article its a wonder the journo didn't offer to have Alstons love child.

      And for those who are wondering I am an Australian.

    3. Re:personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the other private companies will help rural australia because....?

      The only way these people are going to get anything better than a 28.8k modem is through the govt paying for it. aint gonna happen

    4. Re:personally... by doug363 · · Score: 2
      Telstra is bound by legislation to provide a "minimum level" of service to bush, or something like that. I know, it's weak, but Telstra is constantly being harassed at the moment because of it, and it does nothing for Telstra's reputation to have bad service levels in the bush. There's no reason why this legislation and mindset would go away if Telstra was privatised. Telstra's service ranges from reasonably good to pretty appaling, but it was far worse when it was fully government owned and had no competition. If you want to see what governments do when they run stuff, look no further than the disgusting inefficiency of the public service as a whole, and stuff like the ATO or Centrelink in particular. Huge amounts of red tape, with a mentality like they've got tenure. Telstra still has a lot of this sort of mentality and it'll take some time before it gets shaken out. And as for Telstra being an essential service: so is electricity, and it's going (or has gone, depending on where you are) that way too. So is the whole food industry.

      On the other hand, I completely agree with you on the point that Alston has no clue about the IT and telecomms industry. I mean, had he actually had any experience with a large-scale communications network before 1996 or so? Even using the Internet? I have my doubts there. Heck, most slashdotters probably used a computer before he did, and he's minister for IT.

    5. Re:personally... by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main problem with privatizing Telstra is that it is not economically feasible to maintain its infrastructure to the more remote areas of Australia. What would be really good is if the infrastructure became run by a 100% government agency, while the services became 100% privatized, and paid a subscription to the government for access to the infrastructure. Then you could have equal access to the infrastructure for competitors, and no profit-based conflicts over maintaining the infrastructure.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    6. Re:personally... by doug363 · · Score: 1

      Cool. That's a really good idea. It'd solve Telstra's problem of being a monopoly and having poor customer service, and allow the government to keep costs in the bush low. I'm not sure what it'd do to Telstra's wholesaling business, because I've never dealt with that side of them.

    7. Re:personally... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I haven't either, but it would pretty eliminate it. If the government owned the infrastructure, ISPs and such would go to the government for access, rather than Telstra. Telstra would just be another competitor. Of course, Im not sure about the economics/legalities of that sort of a thing. At the moment the government has a 51% share in Telstra, I believe. Im not sure what proportion of Telstra'a net worth is infrastructure. But I think if its possible, that would go quite a way to solving the problem.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  17. Question by jsse · · Score: 3, Funny

    like some others in the Australian government, has learned a little about his portfolio during his 7 years at the helm. He responds openly about his censorhip regime, lack of action against spam and his antipathy towards Electronic Frontiers Australia but refuses to get into details on cyberterrorism response and security expenditure.

    Out of curiosity, where did you aussies pick up those people to run your Government? Law firms? Car insurance companies?

    Microsoft?

    1. Re:Question by narkotix · · Score: 1

      the luddite escaped from a community of ahmish ppl. (lucky for them...bad luck for us aussies that put up with his backward thinking for so long)

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    2. Re:Question by simong_oz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Out of curiosity, where did you aussies pick up those people to run your Government? Law firms? Car insurance companies?

      My first temptation was to mention George Dubya Bush, but I'm not sure if you're american :)

      But seriously (!), as an aussie who has spent a fair amount of time overseas, this is quite an interesting point. The attitude of the average australian to politics is hard to define - complete apathy is the closest thing I can think of but that's not quite right either. All I can say is that it's quite different from anywhere else in the world.

      (Yes, I do realise I'm generalising and oversimplifying here)

      All of the politicians and most of what they stand for are completely hated (that's too strong a word, but it will do). Australians have accepted that they care for nothing more than the next election and protecting their massive superannuation payouts. Whenever a politician speaks, they are just dribbling the same bullshit (read the interview carefully - is any of the questions actually answered?) and lies, and nothing worthwhile is actually going to happen.

      Australians seem to realise that no matter who is elected, they will do the same crap job as whoever was in power before. If the same major party is elected they'll do the same crap job, if the other major party is elected they'll spend 3 years undoing what the previous government did and accomplish nothing anyway. There seems to be a genuine feeling that if every poiltician disappeared tomorrow Australia would actually be better off as a country.

      The upshot of this attitude to politics is that nobody with the slightest grain of intelligence wants to be a politician, so we get people like Richard Alston. You just have to look at our prime ministers over the years ... ye gods

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    3. Re:Question by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      An aussie was heard to remark that anyone going to their parliament should first spend a couple of years in prison - it saves time later. Regrettably after a series of scandals, corruption and incompetence seems to be acceted as the norm of political life.

      I would certainly agree that politician may be above child pornographer in the Australian list of professions, but not by much. I mean there are political scandals in every country, and incompetent politicians too (who can even be elected president) but the problem of disrespect seems particularly high in Australia.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    4. Re:Question by poo203 · · Score: 1, Funny

      dude...the same place you get your politicians....the universal pool of slime.....

    5. Re:Question by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      nobody with the slightest grain of intelligence wants to be a politician

      Hey, Abraham Lincoln was pretty cool! (grin)

      Trust me, people though politicians were tools back then, too. It's an American vice to think that you can rag on a profession like politicking or teaching and expect it to magically improve. Then again, the criticism liberates us from responsibility for our political apathy.

    6. Re:Question by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Informative
      Out of curiosity, where did you aussies pick up those people to run your Government?

      Disclaimer: IANAA (I am not an Australian).

      The ministers that make up the Australian Cabinet are selected from the elected Members of Parliament in the ruling party. I imagine that they are chosen by the Prime Minister in consultation with his party. As in many other UK-style parliamentary democracies (ie England, Canada, etc.) there is little public input into the selection of ministers--though unpopular choices will often be shuffled off into other posts fairly quickly.

      Deputy ministers hold unelected staff position, and they are usually the ones that actually have a good understanding of the portfolio and deal with it on a day-to-day basis. Some ministers are more clued-in than others.

      There is no equivalent to the Senate confirmation process that exists in the United States, which is something of a mixed blessing. There isn't any public debate about choice of ministers. On the bright side, you have to option of not reelecting particularly annoying Ministers.

      The system has its flaws--but it does mean that anyone who holds a cabinet post has had to win an election. In the States, I note that the current Attorney General was nominated shortly after losing his election bid to a dead man. (In principle, IIRC Ministers do not have to be sitting Members of Parliament, but this is almost unheard-of. A Minister without a seat would not be able to speak during government debates--utterly a sitting duck. The Opposition would eat him alive.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:Question by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 2
      All of the politicians and most of what they stand for are completely hated (that's too strong a word, but it will do). Australians have accepted that they care for nothing more than the next election and protecting their massive superannuation payouts. Whenever a politician speaks, they are just dribbling the same bullshit (read the interview carefully - is any of the questions actually answered?) and lies, and nothing worthwhile is actually going to happen.

      Funny, this is how quite a few Americans feel about our politics, particularly after the last election...

      --
      Why?
    8. Re:Question by simong_oz · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: IANAA (I am not an Australian).

      That's OK, it's not your fault :)

      The system has its flaws--but it does mean that anyone who holds a cabinet post has had to win an election.

      In theory, this is correct, but in practise, particularly when it comes to ministers, it doesn't really work that way. Australian politics is effectively a two-party system - Liberal and Labour. Although there are minor parties (Democrats, Nationals) and the rare independent, because of the preference system (and voting in Australia is compulsory) they tend not to pick up many seats, though they can have a major effect through their preference allocation. Also, some seats are much safer than others. Often the cabinet ministers can be moved around into these seats if they are in danger of possibly losing their own seat (Kim Beazley did this I think - his old electorate were mighty pissed off with him for it too). Some of these seats are so safe that the voting there is really a foregone conclusion. In effect, these could be considered a "free" election win.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    9. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on there. We Aussies live in a country that runs on representational democracy. That means that the people in power are representing the majority (even 51%) of people in the community. If they don't represent your views, then it's probably because they're representing the views of some other 51%+ majority. Alston could very well have been voted into government based on the "border protection" policy during the last election. Or any number of other policies. Voters often vote on a single issue, and as far as a lot of Australians are concerned, IT doesn't even hit their radar.

    10. Re:Question by Anarchofascist · · Score: 2

      ...where did you aussies pick up those people to run your Government? Law firms?

      From memory, I beleive that over 50% of the politicians in Australia are lawyers. Don't know what the percentage is in other countries.

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    11. Re:Question by cthugha · · Score: 2

      In principle, IIRC Ministers do not have to be sitting Members of Parliament, but this is almost unheard-of.

      That's wrong, there is a constitutional provision (s 64) that requires ministers to be members of Parliament, at least at Commonwealth level. Non-members may hold a ministerial position for a period of up to three months without being an elected MP, but this is to allow continuity of government during election periods, during which Parliament (or, at least, the House of Representatives) is dissolved and doesn't technically exist.

    12. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      complete apathy

      roughly translated: we really couldn't give a shit.

    13. Re:Question by falsedan · · Score: 1

      Australian politics is effectively a two-party system - Liberal and Labour.

      Nitpick: That's Labour and the Coalition (Liberal and National parties).

      If the upper-class city-folk and country bumkins didn't work together, the flaming unions would be running the show..

  18. Re:mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ZDNet: IT Manager | Builder | Reviews | Shopping | Jobs | Downloads Home | E-Business | Security | HR | Communications | OS | Enterprise Special Reports | Future Tech | Broadband | Headline Archive Linux site hacked | Memory FAQ | Xmas Giveaway | Virus management | Security - White Papers! | Geek Trivia | Security Alert Win Console Games | Xmas specials | Computing heroes | Network security tips | Dual boot | XBox Live crackdown EXCLUSIVE: Alston hits back By Cass Warneminde, ZDNet Australia 27 November 2002 TalkBack! In the first instalment of this two part series, Federal IT Minister Senator Richard Alston talks exclusively to ZDNet
    Ooooooh - stop
    Australia about broadband pricing, Telstra's service levels and Australia's cyber-terrorism initiatives. ZDNet Australia: Can you briefly describe the state of the Australian IT industry as you see it? Alston: It's going through tough times. There are signs of life. Certainly, what we've been trying to do is to create
    With your feet in the air and your head on the ground
    Try this trick and spin it, yeah
    Your head will collapse
    But there's nothing in it
    And you'll ask yourself
    a lot more activity through our Innovation Action Plan. That's really designed to get a lot more SMEs coming through. Why isn't there a single successful Australian IT company competing and shining on the world stage? Can you name one? I think that's a bit misleading in some ways. I don't know if you should put all your eggs in one basket. In many ways it's better to have a series of smaller companies coming through. It is true to say that we haven't had a single company that has really dominated this landscape, but I suppose companies like ResMed have done pretty well and consistently in biotech, if you'd like to count them.
    Where is my mind?
    What is the Government doing to rectify this? We're really in the business of letting one hundred flowers bloom rather than trying to build a national champion. That tends to be an artificial construct and unless they come through and prosper in a way that reflects their competitive success, then they're probably going to lose it all when they get on the big stage anyway. How would you describe the state of broadband in Australia? The Brits released a survey the other day that had us in the top three in terms of broadband
    Way out in the water
    See it swimmin'
    improvements over the last 12 months. If you look at the stats, then overall we're up to about ten percent of households with the Internet having broadband connections. I think business improved by about 170 percent. So, from a low base, broadband is starting to take off. We'll know more when we release our Broadband Advisory Group report, but generally it's a bit misleading to have a single metric because broadband take up for entertainment purposes might be
    I was swimmin' in the Carribean
    Animals were hiding behind the rock
    Except the little fish
    But they told me, he swears
    Tryin' to talk to me to me to me
    interesting, but does it really prove you're a clever country? Probably not. If the SME take up rate was higher, that might be more indicative. If broadband for say, research and national security purposes was world best practice you might say 'well, that's making a big difference'. I think it's a targeted approach. If you put Korea to one side as a special case, we're in the middle of the pack, but it's a very early stage of the race. Do you regret making the comments that broadband in Korea is being driven primarily by demand for porn and games? I said that was a number of reasons given to me by senior players here and there.
    Where is my mind?
    I'm not expressing any personal judgement, I'm just reporting what people say to me. These were not the drunks on the street corner, these were people who have a sophisticated understanding of what's going on. There are a range of other factors. It's a very
    Way out in the water
    See it swimmin' ?
    densely populated country. More than half the population lives in Seoul, more than half the population of Seoul lives in highrise buildings, cyber
    With your feet in the air and your head on the ground
    Try this trick and spin it, yeah
    Your head will collapse
    If there's nothing in it
    And you'll ask yourself
    apartments are very easy to wire up, they don't rely much on the English language so they don't have
    Where is my mind?
    trans-Pacific costs of accessing US databases. I think it is probably true to say ... that if you've been to Korea a few times, there isn't a great deal to do and a lot of kids do come home early an
    Ooooh
    With your feet in the air and your head on the ground
    Ooooh
    Try this trick and spin it, yeah
    Ooooh
    Ooooh
  19. Going to censor this? by nobody+knows+my+name · · Score: 1

    Are they going to censor Yer Sex? If so, I dont know how the hell I am going to find out what I am.

  20. more background information for ppl by narkotix · · Score: 1

    http://www.whirlpool.net.au is where us aussie ppl have our bitch session about the state of broadband in oz. It contains all of the blunders by telco's that we have put up with for the last few years!

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  21. Many ISP's is better than one big ISP. by dagg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Q. Why isn't there a single successful Australian IT company competing and shining on the world stage? Can you name one?

    A. I think that's a bit misleading in some ways. I don't know if you should put all your eggs in one basket. In many ways it's better to have a series of smaller companies coming through.

    ... That is truncated. I agree with that statement. The net was probably better off in the US when there were many small ISP's (rather than just AOL, AT&T, etc).

    --
    your sex in america
    --
    Sex - Find It
  22. No, Alston is just undead by allrong · · Score: 1

    Alston looks like a walking cadaver and maybe that explains his lack of policies. Seriously, the current Australian government never compares itself with Asia, so Korean statistics don't mean anything to them. American comparisons, maybe, but beating the Poms (in cricket) is all that really counts to Little Johnny & Co.

    --
    What is the inverse of the Matrix?
  23. Australian Beer Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why do the Australians call Castlemaine "XXXX"?
    Because they can't spell "beer".

    1. Re:Australian Beer Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do the Australians call Castlemaine "XXXX"? Because they can't spell "beer".

      Castlemaine is Queensland beer and the joke is, "Why do Queenslanders call their beer XXXX?"

      drongo

      omicoo--

    2. Re:Australian Beer Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the correction, drongo. :-) Constructive criticism is always welcome. Is that an Aboriginal name?

    3. Re:Australian Beer Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd ever tasted XXXX, you'd realise it stood for something a whole lot less flattering than beer.

    4. Re:Australian Beer Joke by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Oz beer has only 2 letters, VB.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  24. Information on Senator Alston by Sex_On_The_Beach · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those who are not familiar with the infamous Senator, his profile can be seen here.

    Eat me like a sausage!

    1. Re:Information on Senator Alston by Sex_On_The_Beach · · Score: 0

      ./ his page!! He won't know what hit him.

    2. Re:Information on Senator Alston by tdelaney · · Score: 2

      That's very true - he literally *won't* know what hit him, since he doesn't actually have anything to do with the 'net.

  25. Re:mirror by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

    Dude! Next time, make you the Thanksgiving turkey is cooked properly! :)

    --
    -MT.
  26. Fosters by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2
    (Brewed in the UK)

    And who's even heard of Tooeys?

  27. Hey Diddle Diddle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey diddle diddle,
    The cat did a piddle,
    All over the kitchen floor,
    The little dog laughed to see such fun,
    So the cat did a little bit more.

  28. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it certainly drives my world

  29. PARENT ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well YOU must be on crack, where are your facts neighbour?!?

    1. Re:PARENT ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts about what? That Australia's economy is largely agriculturally based, like many 3rd world nations? Or that Australia therefore has a 3rd world economy with a 1st world lifestyle? You can look up the economic figures yourself. If you still want to deny the facts after that, you need.... something.

  30. The full story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those overseas readers who dont know, senator alston is the minister for technology in Australia, he has copped alot of flack for issues regarding Telstra, and the infamous 3g cap imposed by the company on the users.

    Senator alston is famous for quotes such as "Broadband is only used for pornography" and "3 gigabits (note bits) is enough for everyone".

    He was the head of a 4 million dollar investigation of how spam affects australian businesses. A 98 page report was the output of 4 million dollars of Tax payers money.

    I personally believe that he is out of touch with technology, and is being hand fed statistics and information by australias technology corporations, in their favour.

    Without the necessary infastructure, Australia as a country can not expect to keep their IT professionals in Australia.

    1. Re:The full story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A 98 page report was the output of 4 million dollars of Tax payers money.
      So if it had been a 400 page report would you be happy?
  31. Sheep rhyme for you Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mary had a little lamb,
    She tied it too a pylon,
    10,000 volts went up its bum,
    And turned its wool to nylon.

  32. Alston.. by jamesjw · · Score: 1

    Alston should simply not be in the role he is in, somebody with a 'clue' should be.

    I rarely rant, but I truely think his attitude is 'ignorance is bliss'.

    Stupid amounts of Tax payers money is wasted on reports that seem to favor the big T (Also know as Telstra) One can be cynical into thinking this is done to "fatten up" Telstra for the rest of it to be sold to the public as shares.

    For those who dont know, and its probably been covered above, Telstra is the largest telecomminications and data carrier in Australia - Has a Monopoly on 80% of all comms infastructure, originally owned by the Taxpayers of Australia, the government saw it fit to sell it back to us!!
    1/3 of Telstra remains in Government hands.

    Genius, like it to you buying a VCR, somebody stealing it from you and then offering you to buy it from them, effectivly paying for it again..

    Crazyness..

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
    1. Re:Alston.. by imroy · · Score: 1
      Genius, like it to you buying a VCR, somebody stealing it from you and then offering you to buy it from them, effectivly paying for it again..

      The day after the hugely successful initial sale of shares (25%? 33%?), a female comedian on the radio made a similar analogy. I think it was Judith Lucy on Martin/Molloy, and she likened it to going down to the pawn shop the day after your house was burgled to buy all your stuff back.

      Of course the shares sold like crazy. It's always been ours, and we didn't want to see Telstra added to the already-too-long list of Australian companies owned/controlled by overseas interests. Nothing racist or xenophobic, we just want the profits to stay within the country.

  33. Do the imperfect? or don't do the imperfect by stephendavies · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When Alston's asked about censorship, he makes this comment:
    The simplistic notion that because you can't achieve 100 percent success in closing off any particular Internet site is a reason for not doing anything is not an acceptable explanation
    (and similar words at the start of part 2)

    It looks like he views the imperfect solution as superior to doing nothing.

    But when asked about spam, and plans to legislate about that, he says:
    If it's interfering with the critical infrastructure I suppose yes, but if it's interfering with normal commerce - well, you do what you can. But you don't want draconian solutions that are worse than the problem. It's a nuisance at the moment but if it started to clog up the system then we might have a very different view.
    (Really not sure exactly HOW much spam would be "clogging up the system"!)

    These statement seem inconsistent to me. What do others think?
  34. Filtering of Web good - Filtering Spam bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alston believes that imperfect "content regulation legislation" is better than nothing - it won't stop "smart young kids." But with regards so spam he says "But you don't want draconian solutions that are worse than the problem."

    It's not difficult have a law banning spam in the same way that there is "a law banning murder" and IMHO there are thousands of people who would be willing to help the Australian government if they decided to invest money in writing (gpl?) spam filtering software and distributing it to all ISPs in the country.

    As an aside does the content regulation legislation criminalise smart young kids?

    As a further asside - do Australians not get porn spam?

    Ronan
    -- I can't remember my nick/password.

  35. That's unfair by Goonie · · Score: 2
    Yes, Alston is incompetent, but corruption (in the traditional sense) is a bit harsh. Compared to the US, the level of out-and-out corruption in Australian politics is relatively low - for the simple reason that you can't buy individual votes like you can in the States (parties virtually always vote as a bloc).

    The other thing that should be pointed out is that the policies Alston implements are probably not entirely his own views. He has them imposed from above (the Prime Minister and the rest of cabinet) and below (the Liberal parliamentary caucus imposing things on Cabinet occasionally), and he just implements them. Blame the government as a whole, not Alston. He's just the schmuck that drew the short straw.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:That's unfair by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Re: corruption, a number of them were caught rorting their travel expenses, including one who got off because he had a note from his doctor saying that he only had three months to live. (This was a few years ago now.) The only reason they stopped flinging those accusations back and forth was because Nick Sherry's suicide attempt gave them an excuse... too many people being damaged on both sides, and neither side wanted any more blood drawn, figuratively or literally.

      I don't imagine pork-barrelling your party's electorates really counts as corruption, but it's pretty odious at the best of times, and both parties have been guilty of it (the 'sports rorts' affair for Labour, the Federation Fund for the Liberals).

      Also, Howard's "Code of Ministerial Conduct", introduced after he took office, was a bit of a laugh, as it kept on being violated and he wouldn't do anything to the guilty parties. His Resources Minister owned a load of coal shares and his Small Business Minister ran a few shopping centres on the side.

      There's always Crikey if you want more, mostly true, dirt on Aussie politics.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:That's unfair by simong_oz · · Score: 2

      Don't forget such great moments as:

      [in no particular order other than the one I remember them in]

      * Paul Keating & his pig farm
      * Joh Bjelke-Peterson (pretty much every time he opened his mouth)
      * Bob Hawke - "By 1990 no child will live in poverty"
      * Bob and Blanche
      * Bob Hawke playing cricket with the PM's XI
      * Little Johnny playing cricket with the PM's XI
      * WA Inc, Alan "I'm not your bitch" Bond, Laurie Connell and Christopher "wheezey" Skase
      * Jeff Kennett's regime
      * Pauline Hanson and One Nation
      * Senator Brian "Don't let me catch you looking at naughty pictures" Harradine
      * The speaker of the house who got an enormous injury payout because he fell off his bike

      wait, maybe I do understand where all that political apathy comes from ...

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    3. Re:That's unfair by kubrick · · Score: 1

      * Joh Bjelke-Peterson (pretty much every time he opened his mouth)

      The man who perfectly summed up benevloent dictatorship: "Don't you worry about that." :/

      NSW police corruption up until the mid-1990s* (e.g. Blue Murder, etc.) is probably the most serious endemic corruption I can think of, along with JB-P's reign in Queensland. I am, however, worried by the politicisation of the Public Service, as we saw prior to the last election, with public servants not passing on information that their bosses would have found it politically unfortunate to hear.

      (*I actually think that NSW police corruption hasn't been fully wiped out, but that the reforms have made it harder for those involved to work the way they were.)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:That's unfair by hughk · · Score: 2
      Hmm, I wasn't being specific there but commenting upon the general disregard with which Ozzie politicians are kept. If expectations were higher, mybe better people would enter politics.

      I agree the rot starts at the top and spreads downwards.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:That's unfair by Woko · · Score: 2
      While you may not be able to buy individual votes, the HDTV debarcle shows that the owners of the major media networks can buy laws that protect them from competition.

      HDTV is designed to distract the average consumer from the fact that the government has legislated away the possibility of using the spectrum much more efficiently allowing a lot more competition.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
  36. He's learned "a little"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    s/he's learned a little/he's learned little/

  37. Tacit agreement between gov. and "community" by Goonie · · Score: 2
    Alston and the rest of the government almost certainly know the internet censorship system doesn't work. However, they don't care. It was only ever about placating a nutball Christian fundy Tasmanian Independent Senator in the (misguided) hope that he'd support the privatisation of Telstra, and to a lesser extent keeping the nutball Christan fundies in his own party happy. They believe the problem is solved, all the local pr0n moves its hosting offshore, everybody and their uncle keeps on downloading pornography of every kind, Telstra itself keeps running a full feed of usenet porn groups. Everyone is happy.

    To reply to your actual point, yes it's a complete contradiction. However, the sector of the population who care about IT policy (beyond the ridiculous debate about "selling Telstra") is vanishingly small, and probably vote solidly Labor anyway. So Alston can do what he pleases on every other IT and communications issue.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  38. Srg. Shultz gave Oz IT to the USA. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off Telstra's systems are basically owned by IBMGSA. I have worked as an independant contractor through EDS, IBMGSA and IBM-Biz as a developer/team leader on Telsra's internal IT systems from 95-2001. Telstra and MS are good mates, you cannot get Telstra to intall broadband unless the service man eyeballs an "original MS-Windows CD". Apparently the certifiacte that comes with an OEM machine in place of the CD is not good enough, anyhow I digress.

    When two of IBM's board members turned up on the Telstra board in the mid 90's, guess who got the megabuck five year outsourcing deal in the late 90's. IBM then spent the first three years documenting and testing everything. "Y2k & GST & CSG & LNP...", "its important", "gotta be done". "Pssst, Telstra you could make a truck load of your workers redundant and impress your new shareholders". "We will make offers to the key people with "Y2K" knowlage ( suckers ).

    Year number 4 sees IBM rewrite just about everything they could and re-arrange the org chart on a daily basis. By this time they didn't need expensive "contractors" ( read Alston's SME's ) because Telstra's systems were declared "Functionally stable".

    A cynic might say that they froze development and systematically dispersed the old corprorate IT knowlage as best they could in order to gain control. ( The employees refer to IBM as the "Borg mother ship" ).

    IBMGSA called it "diversifying skills" and "new challenges", had grand speaches about "mindshare" and played "who hid my cheese" videos to the troops.

    Suddenly the telecomms/IT market took a nose dive at the height of the re-org and everything turned to crap. The result, as I see it, is that Telstra's IT is now stocked with MS cerified TAFE graduates spending most of thier time on procedures designed to "push back on problems".

    There will never arise a multi-national IT company from Oz. As soon as one pokes its head up the US boys will just kick the crap out of it. What happened to EDS I hear you ask, well since MS already had the education franchise they went on to do the the South Australian Government and ( I think ) the Commonwealth bank.

    Alston is the Australian answer to Sergent Shultz ..."I know nothinnnnnnng, NuuuThink. H'er Comondant Johnny".

    Alan Mortimer.

    BSc, Computer Science.

    Melb,

    Australia.

    BTW. I do not make any representations for the above companys. But I do appreciate the income they gave me for a while. Politians who want my vote are fair game for comic relief :o).

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Srg. Shultz gave Oz IT to the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget EDS also look after all systems for Australian Taxation, Customs, not just South Oz and Commbank. And of course Caltex/Ampol, and billing infrustrucures for Teslta and Optus.

    2. Re:Srg. Shultz gave Oz IT to the USA. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2
      MS...went on to do the South Australian Government....

      Hehe, why does that sound *so* like Microsoft? :-)

  39. My Mind. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1
    My Mind's gone to pot,but my skills are still hot.

    Spinning, spining,feet in the air.

    His wallet droped out,alongside some hair.

    The courtiers found it,and tore it asunder.

    So who now listens, to fools from down under.

    Beware, Croc's are trained to eat tourists and water buffalo.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  40. The Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Politicians are Assholes.

  41. �29 unlimited broadband by natslovR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Im an Australian living in London and suffered under Australia's broadband reigme for many years before moving here (during the days of the 100meg per month 'external' caps on telstra for example as well as during the introduction of their 3gig cap)

    While a lot of slashdot readers won't appreciate this, I read that article over my £29 unlimited broadband connection. That's not cheap for England, nor is it unusual.

    To even start to pretend that Australia's broadband is better than what is available in England is a load of rubbish. For less than the price of a full-priced computer game or a full priced DVD i have unlimited broadband. The same price in Australia gives me access to a continually failing service with a 3gig cap. If i want to download more than 3gig on the major provider i'm looking at a bill four times the monthly cost. Pretending that 'purchasing power' has something to do with the perceived value of broadband is a load of rubbish. Not only is the broadband deal in England far superior than in Australia on a 'purchasing power' basis but it's far better when just doing a direct currency conversion.

    1. Re:�29 unlimited broadband by perky · · Score: 2
      You might have spotted the following subtle differences between Britain and Australia:

      o Australia is slightly smaller than America, but has a population of 20 million.

      o Britain is slightly smaller than Oregon and has a population of 60 million

      o Britain has a large amount of transatlatic bandwidth installed, and is conveniently next door to continental Europe.

      o Australia is fscking miles from anywhere.


      Now taking the above facts into consideration perhaps you could think about why broadband access is more expensive in Australia than London? You might also consider that when I am at home 30 minutes ride from Charing Cross on good old Connex South East, I cannot get broad band. That's right: scarcely outside the M25 and broadband connections are simply not available.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    2. Re:�29 unlimited broadband by natslovR · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point.

      Richard Alston, in the article, claims that Australian broadband on a 'purchasing power' basis is better value than broadband in the UK.

      As someone that's been a consumer of broadband in both countries my view is that what he's saying is a crock of shit.

      While in Australia using Telstra's 100meg internal limit on cable, then on their 'unlimited' cable, then on their 'unlimited' ADSL then on their 3gig cap i found the broadband experience to be horrible - Constantly worried about what you are doing, making sure you aren't breaking stupid rules, feelig restricted in what you can and can't do.. mind you this is referred to as Telstra's 'Freedom Plans'.

      I've now been using British Telecom's ADSL for over 6 months. I have no complaints and feel it is brilliant. I could be m,mistaken, there may be far superior broadband offering in the UK and else where in the world, but I spent too long in Australia on 'broadband' to have any complaints about BT's offerings.

    3. Re:�29 unlimited broadband by perky · · Score: 2
      Richard Alston, in the article, claims that Australian broadband on a 'purchasing power' basis is better value than broadband in the UK.
      Ah, I see now. Actually it was Management Consultants A.T.Kearney who said that, but either way 10 minutes with google prooves it to be, as you say in excellent Aussie style, a crock of shit.


      I am particularly confused as to how they have come to this conclusion when telstra advertises a 3GB per month connection at about £35, whereas in the UK an uncapped service at the same provision speed is £30. Taking into account purchasing power parity, the difference is much worse, as I imagine you have discovered when you bought your first pint in London. Apologies for being a patronising arse earlier.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  42. Re:mirror by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

    "you might as well have hammered your keyboard randomly for 10 minutes."

    One doesn't need to read /. for long to realize that many people who post here do this anyway :)

  43. Jokes on you. by Rip!ey · · Score: 1

    Why do the Australians call Castlemaine "XXXX"? Because they can't spell "beer".

    Actually mate, nobody here drinks that shit. We export the lot. We name it "XXXX" because we don't know how to spell "cats piss" in any foreign languages.

    1. Re:Jokes on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony gets lost on some people.

    2. Re:Jokes on you. by bernywork · · Score: 1

      ROFL.

      I think its just a case of lazyness, we can't be fucked to find out how to print 100 languages onto a can, and still have space for a logo.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    3. Re:Jokes on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Why do Budweiser crap on about how much it costs them to make in the first place ?

      I dunno if I'd really see that as an indication it's 'fine beer', more a sign of an inneficient production process and unimaginative prick designing the label in the first place :)

  44. Fosters... the rest of the world can have that ;) by modme2 · · Score: 1

    Fosters is Australian for beer for much of the world, except Australia, although the Kiwis are probably in on the secret too.. we can't stand the stuff! That's why we export it ;)

    Coopers is Australian for REAL beer :)

  45. Oh, give me a break. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2

    When was the last time you watched the Simpsons? Next time you do, remeber that it was brought to you by an Australian company...

    Ahhh, that explains why the Simpsons all speak in American accent, and live in Springfield, the most common name for a city in the USA. They also make fun of Australians in hilarious ways... as well as everyone else. But honestly, I think that many Aussies may not have seen those episodes.

    I think it would be better that you said that the Simpsons were BANKROLLED by an Australian corporation... not brought to you by them.

    After all, those are AMERICAN JOKES you're laughing at. You know. Those warhead Americans. Baby killers. But please, continue to bash away, telling us that were all like our "war mongering president" (and nevermind that most of America REALLY WANTS REVENGE, BIG TIME) that hasn't yet started a war... even after being attacked on American soil.

    Honestly, how many Bali blasts do you people need to understand that religious based racism isn't solely directed at the USA, but simply is the easy reference card for genocide?

    1. Re:Oh, give me a break. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Afghanistan the revenge?

      For a long term solution bombs clearly aren't the answer. I seriously doubt anyone reading this can understand the mind of a suicide bomber - to us it's just crazy. But to someone growing up in a dirt floor shanty town with no education and no prospects for the future, watching family and friends die of diseases that don't exist or barely exist in the first world - while Michael Jackson books his monkey in for a penis enlargement and nose job - it's going to breed a lot of resentment, which is exploited by the militant fundamentalists to persuade these people to commit the acts we abhor.

      I think we agree though that religion is just the excuse for the violence, as it's been for mellenia.

    2. Re:Oh, give me a break. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's millenia you terrorist loving fuck.

    3. Re:Oh, give me a break. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's millennia you 'tard

    4. Re:Oh, give me a break. by cranos · · Score: 1

      Okay I'll pick this one up. You know something? Bali is not Australias fucking September 11, funnily enough Indonesia is a violently unstable country in its own fucking right. You should start reading you history before spouting off and trying to use a tragedy to support the unsupportable.

      Now before I get modded down I want to say this, you know why we laugh at the Simpsons down here? Because they represent the worst of the American self absorption. You people couldn't get your heads out of your butts long enough to realise why people around the world don't like you. And its not becuase you are the land of the free and the brave, its because your governments have done over nearly every thirld world country on the planet from the Middle East to most of Asia.

      For a country who says that you promote freedom and democracy you sure have a good knack for backing the biggest bastards on the block (can someone say Saddam for me).

      When you can come back with an a country that America has truly liberated and put on the path to democracy and freedom without screwing them over then you can talk.

  46. oops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/benevloent/benevolent/

    late, tired, etc. :)

  47. Dear Senator Richard Alston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with porn and games, asshole?

  48. Re:Fosters... the rest of the world can have that by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    the Kiwis are probably in on the secret too..

    Yep - we're onto it. Never touch aussie beers myself.
    Speights Old Dark and Monteiths Black , are my favourites.
    Speights is brewed in Otago, Monteiths was brewed on the West Coast until the brewery moved to Auckland.

    Why pay $$$ for imported beer when local stuff is just as good.

    My NZ$0.02.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  49. community animosity for Telstra by more+fool+you · · Score: 1
    What happens is you get some guy who's just moved from the city to a holiday resort, he can't get the broadband speed he wanted and he says it's an outrage.

    it's this kind of comment that senator luddite is famous for. internet is a luxury in the bush, sometimes you can't even even get a telephone line

    never mind that i had to wait 3 months for a landline, and I live in a large rural city

    fuck telstra, for their ongoing abuse and total and utter incompetence. animosity is an understatement

  50. I just bought an HP server off Telstra by laptop006 · · Score: 1

    and it has an IBMGS tag on it... rather cute...

    --
    /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  51. ZDNet Wankers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're doing exclusive interview with the IT minister, then at least you ask him about his stands on open source.

  52. As the original submitter by ynotds · · Score: 2

    I reckon that is very much on topic.

    But you might need to be an Australian and a Stones fan to understand why.

    Time to go help ensure the party in power federally don't sneak back into our state.

    s/illegal/unauthorised/g

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  53. Haven't read of any ? by subStance · · Score: 1

    ZD: Are you aware then, of any complaints being made to the ABA?
    RA: I haven't read of any.
    I always suspected Richard Alston was illiterate.

    --
    Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone