Slashdot Mirror


The Heretofore Unpublished Letters of Ernest Glitch

Roger Curry writes "Letters to Michael Faraday in 1856 from previously unknown victorian experimentalist Ernest Glitch have recently been discovered. The history of science may need to be revised. His letters, and accounts of his work, would appear to indicate the observation of laser action in air, a Victorian Nitrogen Laser, more than a century before Maiman first demonstrated his ruby laser. Also, in a letter dated 8th July 1856 he notes the crystallisation of the fullerene C60 some 150 years before Kroto. Amazingly, there are also accounts of a Liquid-Fuel Rocket Engine detailing the use of hypergolic propellants and deLaval nozzles, a Victorian Tesla Coil, with reference to a possible medieval Coil, and Manned Flight achieved long before the Wright Bros., using Multiple Valve-less Pulse Jets."

83 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Can you say.... by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Informative

    hoax? Get it, get it, the "It's Funny, Laugh" icon should be a hint. The guy's name is "Glitch" for crying out loud.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Can you say.... by coryboehne · · Score: 2

      Not only Glitch, but Ernest Glitch... I picked up on that without even noticing the it's funny laugh icon...

    2. Re:Can you say.... by freeweed · · Score: 2

      And the guy who invented to toilet was John Crapper. Doesn't make that fact any less true.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Can you say.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it would really be cool if Hodges had a crystal eye due to eyeball loss in a prior experiment. Then during a later electricution phase, his crystal eye shoots a laser beam strait out. The first borg!

    4. Re:Can you say.... by coloth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sir Ernest is actually a distant uncle of mine. Instead of the usual transcriptions and whatnot, he convinced Queen Victoria to record his knighting solely using his Numerical Optico-Magnetron. This 3 tonne mechanism transferred images onto a decorative ribbon coated in ferrous suspension.

      Because Sir Ernest died soon thereafter (while tearing the warning label from a new mattress), he was unable to invent a playback device for the ribbon, and he and his accomplishments languished in the gloom of commoner history.

      Luckily, I stumbled upon the ribbon last year up in the attic (quite literally!) and, to my great surprise, found myself driven to spool same into a MiniDV cassette. The resulting images of a Victorian knighting left me at once startled, and somewhat disappointed: Queen Victoria was indeed much homlier than even her most daring caricaturists had suggested.

      Nonetheless, this find at least allowed Sir Ernest to be elevated to the ranks of the historically recognized.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    5. Re:Can you say.... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, what they're saying is that the toilet was more a collabortaive effort, but for some reason Mr. Crapper has floated to the top.

    6. Re:Can you say.... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Do you have research to support this claim. I'd argue that a good many americans cum in their toilet on a fairly regular basis. Granted the keyboard is rapid taking the toilets acclaim but I'd still wager it gets a good bit of attention.

    7. Re:Can you say.... by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 2

      For this to be a hoax, it would have to make some other attempt of historic accuracy. This is a joke, not a hoax.

  2. What about... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the Internet? Al Gore still invented that, didn't he? I hope so.

  3. Disturbing by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny

    For someone writing letters in the 19th century, his signature Looks disturbingly like typeface....

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  4. If only... by Hi_2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Jules Verne or H.G. Wells had written comedy we probably would have gotten something like this

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
  5. Gotta be a hoax by SpinyNorman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just too funny though - very well done.

    Poor Hodges.

    1. Re:Gotta be a hoax by saskboy · · Score: 2

      How could it not be a hoax?
      "Hodges had tried various other ways to ameliorate the discomfort his de-gloved testicles gave him. Ether vapour worked."

      No scientist other than a biologist would write that in a log.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  6. Ernest Glitch by Subcarrier · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, now we know who to blame when there is a serious glitch.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  7. Old News by Lu+Xun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sierra has known about this for some time now.

    --
    That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
  8. Gimme a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This isn't even a good hoax. The letters sound like they were writen by the same guy who wrote the dialog for Resident Evil 1.

    Barry, you saved me!

    NAAAAAGGHHH

  9. In other news... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 5, Funny

    It turns out that Aristotle pioneered the use of hyperthreading in x86 microprocessors way back in ancient Greece. Only problem was he couldn't get any decent uptime, what with the lack of electricity and all...

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    1. Re:In other news... by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative

      This reminded me at once of "The Difference Engine" by Sterling and Gibson.

      Synopsis: A collaborative novel from the premier cyberpunk authors, William Gibson and Bruce Sterling. Part detective story, part historical thriller, The Difference Engine takes us not forward but back, to an imagined 1885: the Industrial Revolution is in full and inexorable swing, powered by steam-driven, cybernetic engines. Charles Babbage perfects his Analytical Engine, and the computer age arrives a century ahead of its time.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:In other news... by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Actually, I recall reading an article once about the discovery of what appeared to be a mechanical calculator. Not quite an x86 processor, but given that they had not harnessed electricity, still pretty impressive.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:In other news... by /dev/kev · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. On the whole, I loved this book, though many of the criticisms over its style are valid - it would have been much better if Sterling simply weren't involved, IMHO. I recommend it to my geek friends whenever possible, mainly because most of them have barely heard about it, if at all.

      I think this book has AWESOME potential for being an excellent movie, if it could be pulled off properly. Far better prospects, than, say, Johnny Mnemonic.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    4. Re:In other news... by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Funny
      It turns out that Aristotle pioneered the use of hyperthreading in x86 microprocessors way back in ancient Greece. Only problem was he couldn't get any decent uptime, what with the lack of electricity and all...

      That has to be wrong.

      Back in 1986, Intel and Sandia built a 1 terraflop computer, capable of 1 trilion (1,000,000,000,000) operations per second. Aristotle died around 322 B.C.E. or 2324 years ago.

      Under one interpretation of Moore's law, the number of operations per second doubles every 3 years or so. Working backwards, that means Aristotle's computer was capable of one operation every 10^213 years. The first computer capable of one operation per second would have had to have been built around 1882.

      Conclusion: Aristotle's work must have been all theoretical.

  10. I wonder if Glitch was really Super Chicken... by Jhon · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...please forgive the penmanship. Hodges` hand was still smoking when I started the sketch, I hurried somewhat, as he was pleading to go to the horse doctor.

    Glitch to Hodges: "You knew this job was dangerous when you took it, Fred".

    -jhon
    1. Re:I wonder if Glitch was really Super Chicken... by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 2
      You knew this job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.

      My favorite Super Chicken quote!

      Which inspired me to find an audio file for that: see www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/5991/sounds.htm

      (I don't think anyone who has watched Super Chicken would call this way off topic, but I could be wrong :-)

      --
      Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  11. Ralph 124c41+ by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and Hugo Gernsback invented TV, Radar, yadda yadda in 1911.

  12. I know bullshit... by crumbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when I see it. I am an American!

    1. Re:I know bullshit... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2

      As a Canadian, I can readily identify bullshit because the link to it is right next to an "It's funny. Laugh" icon.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  13. Re:Meaningless by Invicta{HOG} · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It might be devoid of meaning, but it's full of funny! Some people just don't recognize humor, I suppose. Did you even read the articles?

  14. Spare the cries... by fygment · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... of "HOAX". This is the homepage:

    http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/

    Back to your lives citizens.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  15. Hoax, but... by FosterSJC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly a hoax, but very funny:

    "As an interesting sidenote, Hodges has sustained peculiar fern like scarring and ramifications on his skin where he touched the prime discharge brass. I have endeavored to draw these for you Faraday, please forgive the penmanship. Hodges` hand was still smoking when I started the sketch, I hurried somewhat, as he was pleading to go to the horse doctor."

    "The position of the gap is critical to these phenomena, and afforded me much experimentation, apparently to the detriment of Hodges. Just as I was observing a continuous luminous glow appearing between the top conductors, upon each discharge, Hodges couldn`t go on. His arm had seized and his whole frame was shaking as though palsied. At first I thought he had received another shock, but he maintained fatigue and virtually demanded a rest!

    Sensing a shirker as well as you can Faraday, I took over turning the machine and with some merriment demanded he take observations of the expanded spark. The dolt actually had the audacity to assume a proprietorial stance next to the plates, Faraday! When the prime started sparking over, Hodges emitted a scream the like of which I hadn`t heard since his scrotum was burned off during my experiment with fluorine gas last year. Hodges staggered back from the plates, covering his right eye and uttering blasphemities which would have themselves led to his dismissal, even had he not been blinded. But what had happened Faraday?"


  16. manned flight before Wright brothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    nothing exceptional about that, hot air balloons have been around since the early 1800's.

    They were even used in the civil war.

    The Wright brothers invented heavier than air/powered flight.

    1. Re:manned flight before Wright brothers by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2
      Well, either them or Richard Pearse.

      While he (Richard) himself said that the Wrights flew before him, the little evidence seems to point to the opposite and that Pearse had a more ambitious definition of flight than he achieved. (He is said to have not accepted anything less than a machine that would allow him to fly to town and back as a flying machine, which accounts for his denial).

      It's unlikely we'll ever conclusively know, whomever was first though, it was damn close, and considering that Richard lived in a small rural farming community in New Zealand, miles from anywhere, and had to do everything himself, I think he takes the ingenuity prize, he was a true genius, unrecognized until well after his death.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  17. One thing I love... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    is how he slips in a advertisement for the book he sells on his main page within the articles...

    Man... this is bad science at its absolute worst. (I hope enough people notice the "it's funny... laugh" and don't think it's the "science" section one.) Considering that the only site google has that refers to this particular Glitch <laugh> is this site. Science ain't changing anytime soon.

    Oh, but if you do think this is for real, I have a beautiful bridge I am selling... :-)

    --
    ~ kjrose
  18. I missed the by UrGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's Funny, Laugh" icon. But when I got to the part about poor ole Hodges "emitted a scream the like of which I hadn`t heard since his scrotum was burned off during my experiment with fluorine gas last year", a suspected that this page was out about truth but about entertainment. And it is!

    I still don't see that icon at http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/VicN2/vicN2.html. Where is it?

    1. Re:I missed the by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 2
      I missed the "It's Funny, Laugh" icon [...] I still don't see that icon at http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/VicN2/vicN2.html. Where is it?

      They're talking about the slashdot icon, not an icon at the lateralscience site. It was posted with topic It's funny. Laugh. (icon: bare left foot) rather than topic Science (icon: Einstein's head)

      Scroll up to the top of the page you're staring at right now and you'll see it. :-)

      --
      Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  19. Remember this from Rozencrantz and Gildenstern? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Funny

    The do a sthick like this in "Rozencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead", a fantastic movie with Gary Oldman based on the Top Stoppard favorite.

    One of them keeps discovering advanced concepts of physics (the movie is set in the time of Hamlet) playing with potted plants and bowling balls and feathers, but is never able to fully expand on them as he is repeatedly distracted by plot advancement.

    Its pretty funny, and this kinda reminded me of that.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:Remember this from Rozencrantz and Gildenstern? by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, loved it. Steam engines, Newton's laws ... all so close.

      Minor nitpick -- the movie isn't merely set in the time of Hamlet, it's set in the play Hamlet; Rozencrantz and Gildenstern are minor characters in that play, but this movie focuses on them (with a lot of action beyond what Shakespeare wrote) rather than on the Prince of Denmark. Which is also amusing.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Remember this from Rozencrantz and Gildenstern? by zerOnIne · · Score: 2

      so you're saying that the play of Hamlet isn't set it in the time of Hamlet? :)

      --
      09
    3. Re:Remember this from Rozencrantz and Gildenstern? by AJWM · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, just that time of isn't very specific. For one thing, like many of Shakespeare's plays, things are sometimes anachronistic -- clocks in Julius Caesar, for example. Hamlet is based on a 12th century Danish story, but the play (and movie) are more contemporaneous with Shakespeare's 16th.

      Given that range, the movie The Emperor's New Groove set (loosely and anachronistically) in the pre-Columbian Incan empire could be said to be "in the time of Hamlet" -- but it wouldn't be in the play.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Remember this from Rozencrantz and Gildenstern? by zerOnIne · · Score: 2

      ah, very good point, indeed. but it's still both... i think you're saying that though, too.

      --
      09
  20. Kroto and C60 by Mystic_Rhythms · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kroto wasn't the first to see crystals of C60, Huffman was. Kroto only saw C60 as a peak in a mass spectrometer.

  21. A-ha! by grub · · Score: 2


    Notice how he never mentioned that everyone will have a flying car by the year 2000? Puts the 50's science writers to shame..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  22. he also invented.. by guest12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    the ernestglitch machine which was rediscovered by one Mr. Turing.
    Poor Glitch also forgot to patent a device in later incarnation called paladin or palladium something.

  23. This is a gem by azav · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the home page:

    Experimenting with Weapons-Grade Fissile Material in the Home.

    A Method of Electro-Plating Lizards

    Atomic Hydrogen Blowtorch.

    Any they just keep geting better
    http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/

    Can't wait for the Victorian Cyclotron

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  24. victorian geek pr0n? by evenprime · · Score: 2
    Boy, it looks like these guys were pretty kinky:
    "Faraday, this is even when the top plates are connected by the long anal wire."
    Yes, I know that's not what they meant. :)
    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  25. The Secret Journals of Phineas J. Magnetron by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the line of something in the flavor of Jules Verne, people should also check out:

    the secret journals of Phineas J. Magnetron

    • I received these unusual documents from my uncle who -- perhaps inadvertently -- willed them to me along with an attic full of junk and dusty memorabilia. There were twenty-four books in all, every one of them labeled with a year on the spine and front cover. What captured my attention -- besides the mysterious code -- was that the years began with 1877.

      Magnetron's books appeared to be a journal of some kind, as each entry was preceded by a date written in a bold block lettering. Below each date were as many as 4,408 small numbers and letters, packed 64 characters per square inch with no spaces or identifiable punctuation. The only characters used were the numerals 0 through 9 and the letters A through F, leading the cryptographers to deduce that the code utilized a hexadecimal, or base 16 numbering system.

    nicely done.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  26. Glitch growing grass by Antity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He writes:

    Later that day, Hodges arrived in my lab with Maud the maid. Both were in a dreadful funk. Hodges exclaiming that a volcano was erupting in the south pasture, Maud maintaining that the devil himself had arrived. My first thought was that the pair of them had been at my Indian hemp plantation again, however this would not have accounted for Maud`s clothing, which appeared to have large monoclinic sulphur crystals attached to the posterior regions.

    Indian hemp? Become a scientist NOW! :-)

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  27. Re:Meaningless by Daniel · · Score: 2

    I have to agree. It's almost as absurd as this guy I heard about -- a son of Bach who remained unknown for over 150 years? Laughable!

    Daniel

    --
    Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
  28. Re:Boondoggle or Foofoorah? by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Okay, so you and some others missed the humor; the site is, after all, beautifully done, and convincing in tone and style (.e.g there are lots of well-documented stories about early chemists badly mistreating and maiming assistants exactly as Hodges was -- and worse).

    What I don't understand is why anyone would complain about this if it were real news.

    I mean, this would be an earth-shattering change to the history of science -- the biggest ever! But you say "ho hum, who cares, why are boring stories getting posted"????!!!

    That's much sadder than merely missing that it's humor.

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  29. In another story... by Antity · · Score: 2

    Does that mean the Republicans invented Al Gore?

    Slashdot.org: Al Gore accused as[*] patent infringement

    [*] sic

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  30. A little known fact by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is in memorium of him that we have the phrase "a glitch in the system". ;-)

    -psy

  31. LOL by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    Ernest Glitch ??? how about Genuine Hoax....

    Medievil electricty ummm...yeah right...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  32. firsts by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny


    Poor Hodges is now famous as the first person to receive laser eye surgery.

    The abuse that the poor guy received was astounding. Dig this:

    Hodges emitted a scream the like of which I hadn`t heard since his scrotum was burned off during my experiment with fluorine gas last year.

  33. Meep! by 5KVGhost · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remarkable! I see clear parallels between this pioneering Victorian scientist and the much later experiments chronicled in the televised documentaries of Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and his faithful assistant Beaker.

  34. You're unemployed because... by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Funny

    From this page on his website-
    My own experience with fluorine has been solely with its compounds. In particular, natural calcium fluoride crystals (fluorite or fluorspar). Also hydrofluoric acid, during a highly ill-advised "experiment" conducted in the clean room of a semiconductor manufacturer unwise enough to employ me.... The glass and quartz-ware used in diffusion furnaces must be kept scrupulously clean to avoid contamination of the silicon wafers being processed. Consequently it is periodically bathed in a mixture of hydrofluoric and nitric acids. Full protection clothing was donned over normal clean room eyes-only-exposed garb, and a large silicon wafer (complete with defective 4Mb DRAMs) was "carefully" thrown into the acid bath. Nothing happened for about twenty seconds, as the HF attacked the silicon, heating up the wafer until a runaway reaction started. The acid bath then erupted into a frightening boiling maelstrom, with the violent evolution of copious amounts of red and brown fumes of nitrogen oxides. The complete destruction of high technology by the tiger of chemistry.
    Splendid.

    Now we know why they're shunning away geeks

    --
    - mritunjai
  35. Now, *there's* a hoax - not by Gore... by cirby · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is one of the great hoaxes put on the American people, and it's gained a life of its own. Gore correctly took credit - in a casual comment in an interview - for taking the initiative in Congress in creating what we consider to be the Internet (increasing funding and taking it from a military to a commercial and academic network). Some weeks later, Republicans started using the false "invented" claim.

    1. Re:Now, *there's* a hoax - not by Gore... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah.

      I spoke to David Farber a little after that whole thing got started. Dave Farber was involved in the invention of ethernet, and a number of other key technologies. He's been a well connected, well known geek for a very, very long time. I asked him what he thought of Gore's claim that he invented the internet, expecting to get a chuckle out of him, because he knew many of the people that might have actually been able to make that kind of claim.

      Instead, he got kindof serious, and said, "Well, no, he didn't create the internet, and I think he's been quoted out of context, but he was absolutely responsible for creating the legislative environment that allowed that type of research to be done, and lead to the creation of the internet."

      I felt like an idiot.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Now, *there's* a hoax - not by Gore... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, that's the point. Gore never claimed that he invented the internet. He was quoted out of context. Legislation that he passed that funded the researchers was totally crucial. No one else was going to do it. That's all he claimed to have done.

      So, at best, Mr. Gore did exactly what Farber said. Which also happened to be what Mr. Gore said. He passed laws that made researchers able to do this kind of work, and get paid for it. That's kindof cool.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  36. Thank you. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    I was telling someone about that book today - I read it about ten years ago - but couldn't remember the title. A fortunate coincidence.

    1. Re:Thank you. by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it's almost as bad as the distortion that Bush was "appointed" President.

      That is not a distortion. It is a fact. Florida's own laws regarding election recounts were broken in order to assure Bush's "victory." Kathleen Harris, Florida's then Secretary of State, was G.W. Bush's Campaign Chairman in Florida. Jeb, as we all know, is the President's brother. Both of them should have recused themselves from the debacle. Instead, Harris ordered a stop to the recounts in order to assure victory for her candidate.

    2. Re:Thank you. by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

      Jeb did stay out of the issue. Don't let the facts get in the way of your arguments, however; I find it so amusing!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Thank you. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      You black helicopter freaks make me sick.

      "Black helicopter freaks" are typically right-wing conservatives who believe that the government is out to get them. That hardly describes a left-leaning Democrat.

      Had the above mentiond public servants recused themselves from their elected duties

      When someone has a conflict of interest, it is their 'duty' to recuse themselves. At that point in time, they have no other duties.

      "Gore stole the election in Florida since all of the recounts show that Bush was the winner."

      Then why would Gore have won if those with a conflict of interest recused themselves? Actually, subsequent recounts have varied, with some giving Gore the win and others giving Bush the win -- depending on recount criteria.

      Against state law, Harris accepted the first count from Nassau County (which had a discrepancy) not the machine recount (+52 Gore). The Miami-Dade board, co-opted by Miami's murky political stew, didn't even send in the 157 votes they found for Gore in the small portion they did count before they were "shut down" by Tom DeLay's Congressional rioters.

      But it was not solely the recount that was at issue. According to the London Guardian, Harris erroneously booted 9000-12,000 voters (disproportionately black) off the rolls for supposedly being felons 5 months before the election - only 8000 were reinstated. In Seminole (south of Daytona), Republican officials camped out for 10 days in the supervisor's office adding voter numbers to 4800 forms. In Martin Co., they let Republican officials take them home. Florida has a very strict absentee law. The Republican campaign's altering of the ballots was not a technicality, as the Party's been saying, but a 3rd degree felony - only the voter or relatives can touch them.

      "Gore's election is a sham beacue the election results were never certified by the Florida's Secretary of State (as required by Florida law), since she recused herself."

      When someone recuses themselves, the duties pass to another person. For instance, judges recuse themselves all of the time, and the trials are simply heard by other judges.

    4. Re:Thank you. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Definitely not "irony", unless you're Alanis Morrisette.

  37. Re:150 Years ago by penguinboy · · Score: 2

    "some 150 years" should be read as "approximately 150 years", not "exactly 150 years".

  38. Thank you. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    I've gotten so tired of the Rush Limbaugh drones and their guffaws whenever this distortion is repeated. The Internet, and the technology sector in general, would be in a lot better shape today if we had Al Gore in office rather than the guy that was appointed President.

  39. This poor Hodges guy though... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I never would have wanted to be THIS guy's assistant! First he makes him sick from inhaling quicksilver (Mercury) vapor (very poisonous), then he fries (electrocutes) his hand so bad that he can't use his arm for a month, then the poor guy loses his sight in one eye thanks to the discovery of the laser. How does this guy reward his assistant for giving (literally) so much of himself? He CANS him! And we thought that our employers were assholes! Jeesh!

    1. Re:This poor Hodges guy though... by cosyne · · Score: 2

      And for those of us who were a little slow to pick up on the fact that it was a hoax: "Hodges emitted a scream the like of which I hadn`t heard since his scrotum was burned off during my experiment with fluorine gas last year."
      Mercury and electric shocks are one thing, but i certainly wouldn't wait around to be canned after this.

  40. LMFAO by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    I missed the 'funny' icon but I couldn't help laughing as soon as I read the exploits of poor Hodges. Whomever wrote this should turn it into a weekly cartoon. Some of us that have been zapped, blown up, suffered chemical burns, etc in our path of discovery can't help but feel for this guy. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  41. This should've been a BBC comedy... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2

    ...made in the 1970's and re-runs played on PBS stations here in the states afterwards. Leonard Rossiter could've played the perfect Glitch.

    1. Re:This should've been a BBC comedy... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2

      Now that you mention it, by jove I think you're right!

  42. Damn time travellers by naoursla · · Score: 2

    There they go again. Trying to take credit for someone else's work.

  43. Just like Einstein's wife... by Synonymous+Soured · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it was *Mrs. Glitch* who should really get the credit.

  44. Re:150 Years ago by penguinboy · · Score: 2

    Supposing that you're correct, what then would be the point of putting in "some" if it's supposed to be completely ignored?

  45. I'm an idiot by Galvatron · · Score: 2

    I forgot to mention that what they believe is a mechanical calculator was an ancient greek artifact. That was really the whole point. Jesus, I don't even have the "coffee" excuse.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  46. "Stuff that matters." by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure which is more indicative of Slashdot's editorial decline -- this story, or the rash of duplicates.

  47. Re:150 Years ago by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 2
    Maybe the A.C. thinks "some" functions like the "in-" in "inflammable" or the "ir-" in "irregardless". ;-)

    That works for "howsomeever", but m-w.com doesn't think that's a word.

    It doesn't seem to work for awe-, grue-, hand-, whole-, worri-, etc.

    "...some X years" -- seems like an adjective there. Dictionary.com says "some: adj. 1. Being an unspecified number or quantity". Works for me.

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  48. Funny Stuff by SloWave · · Score: 2

    These letters are a classic. Probably should be ran thru Victoriantalk though. The parent site has some of the coolest stuff I've seen in a while. I hope somebody mirrors it before the ARM shuts it down.

  49. air nitrogen laser works, though by g4dget · · Score: 2
    The site is a hoax, but the laser is real and could have been developed using Victorian techniques.

    Here is a modern description. You can put one together for a few dollars. It delivers nanosecond pulses of UV laser light that you can use to excite dye lasers and do other neat stuff with.

  50. And electroplated lizards... by mtec · · Score: 2

    make wonderful earrings...

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  51. Hoax and funny too. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course it's a hoax, the whole thing reads like a comedy of errors where the poor servant Hodges is subjected to various nasty injuries as a result of Glitch's experiments.

  52. Re:Boondoggle or Foofoorah? by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

    Delightfully done! Toodle pip! Cheerio!

    All I can keep thinking is: Poor Hodges. I can imagine who he must have been cursing... :P

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  53. Troll? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    How is the parent a "troll"? How can providing providing factual information regarding an interview be considered trolling?

    "Troll" does not mean something that you don't want to hear.

  54. Re:Lame by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2

    If you honestly thought "Ernest Glitch" was a real Victorian scientist you need to have your brain replaced.