Slashdot Mirror


Making Low-Budget Movies?

strider3700 asks: "One of my favorite shows was cancelled today and it's left me feeling rather bitter towards the mainstream. I tend to like shows more intelligent then 'Survivor' but I'm in the minority so shows won't be made to pick up that small percentage. However now and again I find great video clips on the net. They appear to be homemade and are in some cases very well done. Is it possible to do something like this for a continuing series and place it on the net to share? how would someone go about doing something like this? And I know not to quit my day job."

55 comments

  1. I sympathize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They cancelled "Golden Girls" a long time ago. I'm still upset.

    1. Re:I sympathize by ajw1976 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for being a friend.. duh duh duh duh duh.

      --
      1. Bad signature
      2. ?????
      3. Profit
  2. copyright? by DonFinch · · Score: 1

    I wouldnt continue a previous copyrighted work. Might not be healthy...when the studio shows up with a tank.

    --
    -- Insert wisdom here:
    1. Re:copyright? by moncyb · · Score: 2

      That is true, but where did it say he was going to "continue" that show? It sounded more like he wanted to make his own original short movie(s).

  3. Always consult Google first by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 2
  4. Duality by kilroy_hau · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a low budget, professional looking, star wars video here

    If you visit the site you will find out what they did, what software to use, and general tips to make a movie.

    Anyway, the important thing is not the technology, but the history you are trying to tell.

    (I'm glad you didn't ask how to get profit, though)

    --


    Kilroy was here!
  5. low budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the problem. When movie makers (even indies) talk about "low budget", they mean "under one million dollars".

    Even the cheapest, crappiers, simplest, no-staff, no-nothing movies require high-roller investers to bank you. Anything less than $250,000 is going to look like you shot it with your high-8 during junior-high A/V class.

    1. Re:low budget by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clerks cost around $16,000 to film and it looks not so bad.

      The Last Broadcast cost less than that, I think like $1000 and it looks pretty decent. It looks like video, but if you are showing it on Atomfilms or something, that's fine.

    2. Re:low budget by irontiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read Robert Rodriguez's book: Rebel Without a Crew: Or How a 23-Year-Old Filmmaker With $7,000 Became a Hollywood Player

      ISBN: 0452271878

      He spent a month having medical research done on him while he wrote his script to raise money for the movie. It was beyond no frills but he made a good film.

  6. Public TV by moc.tfosorcimgllib · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you are in the U.S. (I'm assuming you are), go to a public TV station and ask what it takes to produce a show for them (Usually they will provide equipement you can use in their studio for production).

    A few suggestions: buy a nice video camera if you plan to produce a show outside their studio. If you want something with your own homebrew FX, buy a nice video card with TV-in/out functions.

    1. Re:Public TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A significant chunk of your tax dollar and your cable fees go to support those fucking idiots doing their public access shows (you know, the ones that are basically outlets for homeless, mentally insane potheads).

    2. Re:Public TV by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      So you might as well take advantage of it.

    3. Re:Public TV by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      How big is "significant", exactly?

    4. Re:Public TV by hether · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a big difference between public television and public access television.

      Public television gives us things like Sesame Street. Public access television gives us shows that some kid created with his two friends and a sock puppet.

      It is true that public access stations will usually let you use their studio and equipment for free or little charge. I doubt the same can be said for public television stations.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    5. Re:Public TV by akb · · Score: 2

      Municipalities are allowed to collect up to 5% of cable co's gross revenue, with around 20% of that typically allocated to public access stations.

    6. Re:Public TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww.. we have to be homeless, too?

    7. Re:Public TV by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Is this Alan? Funny running into you "here".

      1% doesn't sound like too big a cost to me.

  7. don't leave me hanging by misfit13b · · Score: 1
    One of my favorite shows was cancelled today...

    Which was...? Hell, I don't even know what day you refer to by "today".

  8. Why Not? by Timinithis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look at the success of Troops. Granted there hasn't been another one made, but while this falls under the parody aspect, creating something within a genre doesn't have to be a parody, and if well done can actually gain the blessing of the original creator. I remember I was one of the luck few at DragonCon 1998(?) where they debuted a film short made by an Australian troup depicting the delivery of the Death Star plans into the hands of the Alliance. They focused on Mara Jade, a definite Lucas/SW copyrighted character, and were blessed by George himself. This was *not* a parody at all.

    --
    Sig? What's a Sig?
    1. Re:Why Not? by wizzy403 · · Score: 2

      I was there for this. It was 1999, the film was called Star Wars: Dark Redemption. Shortly after we saw it at D*C, Lucas pulled his "blessing" of the film, sadly.

    2. Re:Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mara Jade? She had nothing to do with the delivery of the plans (officially). It was Kyle Katarn who infiltrated the imperial base and stole the plans (remember the first Dark Forces?).

  9. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    One of my favorite shows was cancelled today and it's left me feeling rather bitter towards the mainstream. I tend to like shows more intelligent then 'Survivor' but I'm in the minority so shows won't be made to pick up that small percentage.

    Are you sure? --AC

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am smart. S-M-R-T.

  10. Remember that MIT thing? by David_Bloom · · Score: 1

    Remember that thing MIT did where they took videos of talking human heads and put words in their mouths, and made convincing results? Perhaps this would work to continue dead shows...I don't know if it can save cartoons (Futurama...[sob]) though.

    --

    Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
  11. BotSequitur V1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non Sequitur \Non seq"ui*tur\ [L., it does not follow]
    n 1: a reply that has no relevance to what preceded it

    AutoGoogle
    AutoSlashBack
    AutoEverything

  12. Intelligent? Yeah, right. by rudy_wayne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "I tend to like shows more intelligent then 'Survivor' "

    But not intelligent enough to know the difference between 'then' and 'than'.

  13. Look at me, I'm pretentious by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Survivor is a great show. And "than" is spelled "than."

  14. What the hell is your question? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really couldn't understand what you are asking. We understand your motivation but little else. Are you asking how to distribute large video files on the internet? Are you asking about how to deal with the legal issues of using copyrighted characters? Are you asking for advice on video equipment? Are you asking how to make a movie?

    I'm not sure any of us are going to be able to help you since it's not clear what skills you have, how much money you're willing to spend and what, specifically, you are having a problem with. And it's not at all clear to me what that sentence about Survivor has to do with anything. Why did you throw that in?

    Editors: why are you accepting submissions like this? This Ask Slashdot question isn't even well posed!

    GMD

    1. Re:What the hell is your question? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought the intent of his question was pretty obvious. He's noticed that readily-available media offerings aren't generally high-quality, but that there is a fair amount of good stuff floating around that's relatively freely available, and though he isn't sure what's involved yet, he'd like to put his metaphorical money where his proverbial mouth is and try to contribute to this pool of good watchable material.

      In other words, "While there seem to be fewer and fewer worthwhile shows in the mainstream media (such as the unnamed show that has been canceled, and I think most slashdotters can guess what the likely quality of its replacement show will be) there seems to be a growing pool of good free material online, and I'd like to contribute. Has anyone here been involved in this? What do I need to know to participate?"

      Yes, it IS a very general question, which contains a lot of smaller questions within it, but this is Slashdot, not rec.arts.video.online.bandwidth-questions or some similarly specific tech support forum. I think what the poster was hoping for is some discussion of all of the aspects so that he'll be able to formulate more specific questions and take them to more focussed forums. Besides - general or not, someone interested in improving the quality of available entertainment ought to be encouraged regardless of how much they already know about the subject, not told to go away until they already know most of what they need to do...

      (I didn't at all get any sense that he wanted to continue the cancelled show, just that the cancelling of what he considered to be a good show was an indicator of the decline of "mainstream media" quality, which I think most of us can sympathise with.)

      So, yes, all of the above, and more. Seems a perfectly valid and potentially informative topic for discussion here. A few of us occasionally read the more general "ask slashdot" discussions for general education ourselves...

      So...to contribute what little I can:

      Firstly, decent writing and acting (even for animation - hey, somebody has to do the voices) is the key to watchable material. This is probably already obvious to the person asking the question (as well as everyone else here) but it should be said.

      As to the "internet distribution" portion of the question, one might contact the The Internet Archive and the folks at Creative Commons about hosting and licensing, if one's willing to release the material freely.

      At this point I'll also throw in a nod to one of my "pet causes" - Ogg Theora which, if they get a bit more visible on the development of it (likely to happen in March, when the format freeze is supposedly scheduled, though the second Alpha release is due Real Soon Now. At the moment, though, development appears to be a "Monty Only" project that shows up as infrequent "chunks" of updates in CVS when official releases come out. At least news is starting to show up on the mailing list...) will supply a very nice no-license-hassle format for distribution.

      Transforming the recordings to a wide variety of internet-ready formats can be done with MPlayer/MEncoder in combination with a few other tools (ffmpeg, mjpegtools, the aforementioned Ogg Theora), not to mention using mjpegtools' encoders to convert video dumped from MPlayer to VCD or SVCD format for viewing on standalone players.

      Someone else will have to comment on technical issues of camera and recording media types most suitable for generating internet-ready material. In MY opinion, if one handles the rest of the matter well, it's probably possible to produce perfectly adequate "good amateur quality" internet videos with ordinary off-the-shelf video cameras and a halfway-decent digitizing card. Last time I attempted video capture it was from a VHS tape, with a BT878-based card and "streamer" from Xawtv to store as a relatively high quality mjpeg/pcm quicktime file [to allow > 2GB files] then dumped to mjpegtools to generate SVCDs.

      Any other topics in this broad discussion I've missed?...

  15. Undergrads by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2
    Yeah, I hate it when my shows I like get cancelled. Right now I'm watching the 13 episodes of Undergrads over and over and over again. It comes on 4 times a day on Teletoon. And I still don't get sick of it.

    Then you get crap like Bachelor which will be going into its third season.

  16. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read a book.

  17. Enlist talent from community theatre by shunnicutt · · Score: 2

    I can't comment on any technical issues, having never really realized any of the crap I planned when I bought my camcorder.

    However, it occurs to me that you need people to put in front of the camera and stories for them to tell. Check out your city's local theatre community and you'll probably find people to collaborate with.

  18. Making Low Budget "Programs" ? by jayrtfm · · Score: 3, Informative
    One of my favorite programs is no longer on the shelves of Comp-USA, and it's left me feeling rather bitter towards the mainstream.
    I tend to like programs that run from the command line but I'm in the minority so programs won't be made to pick up that small percentage. However now and again I find great programs on the net. They appear to be homemade and are in some cases very well done. Is it possible to do something like this for several version releases and place it on the net to share? how would someone go about doing something like this? And I know not to quit my day job."


    I hope my point has been made. You have a lot of research ahead of you. 20 years ago you would be making S-8 films and be limited to 1950's special effects technology. Fortunatly, today with DV cams and computer editing and efx, the tech end of it isn't the main problem. Now, your main problem in creating a show is dealing with people, unless you're making a silent puppet show. Basically, don't be and don't work with assholes, and supply good food during a shoot.

    As for distribution, you'll need to hook up with companies who can afford the bandwith if your show catches on. Which can happen in just a few days. You wouldn't want to be the next Mahir or 401The Movie just to have new viewers get a "bandwith limit exceeded" message when they try to view it..

    Of course the next step is ????? then Profit!

  19. So you wanna make a low-budget movie? by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out So you wanna make a low-budget movie on SoYouWanna.com.

    This is probably a good starting point. You should be able to find some good tips and some additonal references to check out.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

  20. Paraphrased by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2


    "I want to reenact "Wayne's World", a al geek style. How do I do it? What programming should I have? Will you guys watch my show?

    Well, will ya?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  21. niave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just not how it works. Public TV
    relys on Government money and they operate
    like a beauacracy. The last thing the want
    is some kid off the street coming and showing
    everybody that TV production is easy. You'd actually have a much better chance with a local
    cable company ISP's public access station. They
    used to do this back in the "Wayne's World" glory
    days; ;though they've managed to fill out the
    stations with more, real stations.

  22. Cheap, even really cheap can be ok by Murrow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's another article on no-budget film making.

    Having been to quite a number of amateur film making festivals at sf cons, I can tell you it doesn't necessarily take money to make an enjoyable movie, but it does take time, patience, and some talent. With nearly identical budgets the films vary substantially. About 33% are unwatchable due to technical issues (sound, lighting, editing), 33% are unwatchable due to artistic issues (acting, story, pacing), and 33% are better than any SCI-FI Channel Original production ever aired. (Don't ask about the final 1%, really!)

  23. A friend of mine did this (in the UK) by Malcolm+MacArthur · · Score: 1
    Made his own movie. Called Godsend II. Oh, he also made a film called "Godsend" first...

    The main ingredients are ingenuity, time and dedication. Oh, and you have to find actors who'll work for nothing. Naturally, under these circumstances acting quality can vary. Nevertheless, the film turned out OK.

    One big problem he stumbled across was the cost of getting your film rated. Here (UK), you have to submit it to the British Board of Film Censors (oops, "Classification" :) who then watch it and decide on its rating. They charge about 100 UKP a minute for this "service" :)

    note: Mainly posting to undo a bad moderation, but I thought I ought to contribute something relevant.

  24. Free tools by outofpaper · · Score: 1

    Guys and Dolls its almost Christmas time so lets not forget the presents that we have already given each other. There is blender ( http://www.blender3d.org )an amazing 3d modeling suit and Cinelerra ( http://heroinewarrior.com/index.php3 ) an advanced compositing and editing system like Adobe Premier yet free. On top of that there are a pethora of audio editing programs but that isn't what I deal with at the moment.

  25. Recipe for low budget: by ericski · · Score: 1

    Decent video camera $1000
    Motel room $50
    Cheap hooker $100
    Enough beer to overlook the ugly (her's or yours) $50
    Bail money $500

    For everything else, there's Mastercard(tm)

  26. 401 The Movie by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    You have the title wrong - It's 405, not 401.

    Just be careful where you host your movie, or it will become 404 - The Movie.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  27. Thoguht about this a lot by xagon7 · · Score: 1

    It seems one of your problems may be solved here:

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/18/1892 33 &mode=thread&tid=95

    What a day.

  28. Video equipment by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having dabbled a little bit in amateur clay and live action films myself (never released anything yet though), I have a few suggestions on your camera and software of choice:

    MiniDV is a great format if you can't afford anything better.
    Adobe Premiere, combined with The Gimp or Film Gimp, and POV-Ray can handle most of your editing and special FX needs.
    Use 1394(Firewire) to transfer video! No Analog/Digital/Analog conversion crap allowed!
    Expect to spend at least $800 on your camera for a barely-good-enough-for-basic-film-making model.
    Make sure your camera has a progressive scan mode; it brings the feel of the video slightly closer to film, and improves computer display quality.
    If you can afford it, buy a 3-CCD camera. If you've the money, a 3-CCD camera is a must-have.

    Ideally, for amateur no-budget films, you'll want to spend around $3000 on your equipment and software, but that stuff should last you a long time and serve you faithfully.

    Oh, don't forget a good boom mic and tripod! Way back in high school (3 years ago ;p) we made a Star Wars parody complete with light sabers and explosions. We had a guy who tracks techno music with Impulse Tracker mix the sound FX (he did a freaking awesome job!), used Premiere 5 for editing, Photoshop 5 for drawing light sabers and effects frame-by-frame, and a good boom mic for the sound. I don't know how much they spent on the mic, but expect to spend a lot; I'm guessing at least $150. Our camera was only $1200, but it had progressive scan, so it really lent a film-like look to the video when it was presented on the 30 foot tall screen at an assembly in the auditorium.

    Folding up the tripod and using it to carry your camera around during moving camera scenes can go a long way to making the image a lot more stable, especially if you have jittery hands from drinking too much Mt. Dew.

    Thus ends this disjointed rambling.

  29. Well, here goes nothing... by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 1
    I'm currently enrolled in a broadcasting class at my high school this year after having taken a digital filmmaking class last year. We have done everything in Final Cut Pro (as we have Macs, and it is the best editing software for the money, period), and I handle most of the editing for the broadcasting team. I'm currently working on writing my own video filters and effects using FXScript in Final Cut Pro and generally learning a ton about it.

    That said, here's the equipment that we use to make it happen:

    • 1 Canon GL2 MiniDV camera
    • a bunch of Sony digital video cameras (that's not the exact model, but close to it)
    • a boom mic (I have no idea what model, but it cost around $300, I think)
    • a wireless clip-on mic (again, no idea what model, but it works well)
    • a bunch of G4 Tower workstations with Final Cut Pro 3 (though this is mostly because we have a ton of people doing different things all at once, you don't really need more than 1)
    • a dual 1Ghz G4 Tower with 1.5GB RAM on which we (I) assemble everyone's edited footage and export to video.
    The Canon camera is our high-quality camera - we use it whenever possible, as the footage quality is much better than the Sonys. Also, what is probably its greatest advantage is the additional adapter module that attaches to the bottom of it and allows mic input from the boom mic and wireless mic (which have 3-pronged plugs instead of what most of us have on our computers). It comes with dials to adjust the mic input levels and such. This allows for an exponential leap in sound quality, as good mics cut out annoying background noise like humming, hissing and other general environmental noise. Don't use the cameras' built-in mics if at all possible, as these just can't get close enough to the speaker to cut out other noise and usually aren't very high-quality anyway.

    We use Final Cut Pro mostly because we have the luxury of a lab full of mid- to high-end Macs, but also because it is an extremely powerful software package for what you pay for it. The only thing that really compares in that price range is Avid XpressDV, which is slightly more expensive, runs on Windows and has its own unique advantages. Some people will try to tell you to use Adobe Premiere to edit your footage, as it is less expensive than either of the two suites that I just mentioned, but I wouldn't recommend it. While I have not worked with it personally, my filmmaking/broadcasting teacher worked with it at the last school he taught at, and it gave him nothing but trouble.

    Any serious video editing will require some serious hardware to handle everything smoothly. Tons of RAM (on the order of 768MB or more) is a must, and it is also desireable to get a dual processor machine (dual Athlon systems are fairly inexpensive if you're working on a tight budget and choose to go with a Windows solution). Also, make sure your machine supports FireWire. On any fairly new Mac, this is a given, and support for it is built right into OS X and has worked flawlessly for me. FireWire is pretty much the only way to do video capture well, as most, if not all, DV cameras support it and it is many times faster than USB.

    The editing will take much longer than shooting any of your actual footage. Make sure to plan your time accordingly.

    Also, if you want to get better image quality, see if you can find a digital video camera that uses BetaSP instead of MiniDV. They may be more expensive, but they produce a much higher image quality and consequently, look much better on NTSC monitors and TVs (I'm assuming you're in the US here).

    As far as distributing your footage is concerned, I know that Final Cut Pro allows you to export the movie in several different formats suitable for online distribution, as well as printing back to tape and burning to DVD. Printing to tape is how we finalize our broadcasts, as we just hook up a camcorder, record our edited footage onto it, and then hook the camcorder up to the coax broadcasting hardware with component video cables. Beyond that, I don't have any experience. For DVD authoring, I know that Apple also sells DVD Studio Pro, which I've heard is an excellent DVD authoring tool.

    I've learned so much in this past year of working with digital video that I'm sure there's tons that I'm leaving out, but I hope this is enough to give you an idea of what is required. Please feel free to respond with any more questions, I'd be happy to answer them.

    --

    --sdem
    1. Re:Well, here goes nothing... by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2
      Oh, I almost forgot. You don't need a progressive scan camera to be able to get that "film look" for your footage. The same thing can be done in software with video filters. As I'm most familiar with Final Cut Pro, I would like to now point you to Joe's Filters, where he provides a "film look" filter along with a ton of other highly useful effects and color correction utilities.

      Also, while I'm on the subject of effects, I'd like to touch on a matter of personal taste. Don't use the canned transitions that come with editing programs, like wipes and dissolves. They are cheesy. Instead, go with an immediate cut between clips, a cross-dissolve or a fade out/fade in.

      --

      --sdem
  30. What he's really asking... by mike_mgo · · Score: 1

    How do I get started in the amateur porn business?

  31. Quake Movies! by Yarn · · Score: 2

    A while back there was a craze for quake demo files as movies, some were great (blahbalicious, operation bayshield).

    I was involved with the UK Quake Movie Project, unfortunately it was usurped by a goth with ulterious motives and it became a shoddy lovecraftian nightmare rather than a surreal comedy with cows.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  32. Try Indiana University! by sysadmn · · Score: 2

    Many universities have excellent opportunities to participate in low budget video production. Check your local campus, and keep a raincoat on.

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  33. Non by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.non-sequitur.com/

  34. an awsome book on the subject... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mwp.com/pages/booksdigitalfilm101.html

  35. I don't know how by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

    I don't know how you would go about it, but I can offer you some advise - don't let your work end up like this or this!

  36. Adobe filmstrip reader by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    I've made a program that converts a filmstrip to either a single PNG or a sequence of PNG's. I'm going to release it on SourceForge once I've added some new features and polish. If anyone actually reads this post and wants the program before then (it already works), leave feedback for me using the form on my website, or reply to this post.

  37. A good book about this by Savatte · · Score: 2

    is Bruce Campbell's autobiography, If Chins Could Kill. Talks about what you need to do before you actually start filming, and the huge amount of work raising the money takes