Slashdot Mirror


Thermally Powered Mechanical Wristwatch

Raghu Mani writes "Theremally powered quartz wristwatches - which use minor temperature variations to generate electricity - have been around for a few years. Now here is something a lot more radical - a thermally powered mechanical watch. Invented by an American - Steven Phillips - it uses small temperature variations to wind the mainspring of the watch. A patent has been awarded for this - check out this link. A small article on the technology can be found here and the guy's own website is budapestwatchco.com. I doubt if any of us will be buying one of those watches anytime soon, though - just check out those prices ;-)."

147 comments

  1. Everything mechanical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.. When we get back to mechanical computers.

    1. Re:Everything mechanical by spybreak · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Is it just me or is Slashdot losing focus?

      There are plenty other (better) resources out there for general news, information and popular mechanics. I come here for news about software, hardware, networking, open source, and internet, as well as a limited selection of other technical stuff.

      Having said that it is Christmas Day and maybe I should just turn this machine off ;)

    2. Re:Everything mechanical by Rubbersoul · · Score: 1

      holiday = slow news day

      plus this is still kinda cool

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
  2. 1st post?? by xenocytekron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    hmm will the body temperature affect it?

    --
    This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
    1. Re:1st post?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or will if affect body tempriture.Portable air con?

  3. Heh by B3ryllium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pfft! You're supposed to tell us about this BEFORE christmas!

  4. 16 grand for a watch?!? by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 1

    Just find a way to joe cell my g-shock and i'll be happy.

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
    1. Re:16 grand for a watch?!? by jayratch · · Score: 1

      No.

      16 grand is the cheapest watch the company sells, and is a conventional mechanical watch.

      The perpetuals start at just over $64k.

      Thus this is a plaything for the very rich.

  5. "real patents" vs epatents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are there people/against-epatent-zealots who want to abolish patents at all?

    1. Re:"real patents" vs epatents by Goldenpi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, patents are important. But I think the system needs some changes. At the moment patents are very easy to get. In austraila someone managed to patent the wheel a few years back. They patented it as the "circular transportation facilitation device". In the US an anti-patent person noticed their child using a swing sideways and applied for a patent on sideways swinging. They got it. The ausie patent was done on a fast-track application, but the US swing was a normal patent subject to the same scrutiny as any other (ie zero). Other famous patents are IBMs famous patent for a computerised airplane toilet queueing system and Microsofts patent on the ASF format, which they used to bully Virtualdub because it could transcode ASF.

  6. Re:Fp by Tasy · · Score: 0

    Doh.

    --
    ------ ( Read More... | 666 of 682 comments )
  7. Imagine a ... by nikhilwiz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Beowulf cluster of these. I bet you could run the ISS with astronauts from NASA and Russia having sex in turns. How costly is sex in russia?

  8. A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clever stuff like this DESERVES patents, not one click shopping and silly little algorythms.

    Luckily I live in a country with a sane patent system!

    1. Re:A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unless you are educated in the field of mechanical watch engineering, how could you decide whether this invention really deserves to be protected by a patent? This kind of feeling is exactly what is wrong with the patent system in general and particularly software patents: People who have no expertise in a certain application field decide what is and what is not patentable. An important part of the battle against software patents is about explaining the general problem with monopolies which are based on intellectual property. Software patents make the flaws of the current patent system more obvious, but they are in no way fundamentally different from "normal" patents.

    2. Re:A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given that japanaese manufacturers have been doing this for a while, how is this deserving of a 20 year monopoly?

      Sorry to break this to people, but the idea of powering a watch based on variations in ambient temperature is not new.

      I see this as cool etc. that its powering a mechanical watch instead of a quartz watch, but I still dont see anyone deserving a 20 year monopoly on it.

      Can we really be certain nobody else would have come up with this idea within 20 years?

    3. Re:A good patent by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So do you think that we could save the patent system by maybe having things review by a committee made up of people in the related field? I am just curious as to how people think we could rework a broke (In my opinion system) to make it respectable again.

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
    4. Re:A good patent by Hal-9001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The mechanism behind a thermal self-winding mechanical watch and a thermally-powered electrical watch are probably quite different. From skimming the patent, it seems that the thermal self-winding mechanical movement uses the thermal winding of a bimetallic spring to wind the mechanical movement of this watch (sort of like how a bimetallic spring is used to regulate a mercury switch in many thermostats). A thermally-powered electrical watch probably uses the voltage generated across a bimetallic junction to drive the quartz oscillator (which is more akin to a Peltier cooler run in reverse). I agree that, while the idea is clever, it does not deserve patent protection for the next twenty years. On the other hand, the market for this type of invention is pretty small, and other watch makers are free to continue manufacturing other types of self-powered movements (self-winding, kinetic generators, thermoelectric, etc.), so granting the patent does not especially harm the market.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    5. Re:A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you have already seen the clock called "Atmos" by Jaeger-Le Coultre and know that it is not at all an original idea.

    6. Re:A good patent by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 1

      An atoms clock is kinda large and uses a sealed gas chamber that expands or contracts and thus winds the mainspring. You cannot put one of those on someone's wrist. The challenge was to produce something compact enough to replace the gas chamber of the atmos clock.

      - HCE

    7. Re:A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "People who have no expertise in a certain application field decide what is and what is not patentable."


      I think there's only one thing you can do about it. Go get a job there, if you're so inclined. Or else, You could pretend that someone else will fix it for you because you're too busy with your own job. How would you go about hiring and maintaining such "expertise", while keeping application costs reasonable? I don't get from you that you're an expert in the applicable laws and policies. If that is correct, there's a better chance at the lottery than there is in complaining.
      Complaining will only produce solutions worse than the problem. You see, your complaint will be substantially entirely mediated through already-involved interests and governmental foundations, and your lack of personal experience/"expertise" will render the process entirely out of your control. Sad, isn't it?

    8. Re:A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miniaturization? So that makes it original?

    9. Re:A good patent by DaveOnNet · · Score: 1

      Patents are supposed to encourage people to solve problems that would not otherwise get solved. The system supposedly does this by allowing the solver to make money with the solution before others do. I am not familiar enough with the current system to analyze it very well, but might something like the following work better...

      Suppose that the first step in getting a patent is to state a problem and let it hang out there for some time (say 6 months). It would be the job of the patent office to compare the problem statement with previous problem statements and reject any that match too closely.

      For this watch, the statement might be "How can mechanical power be generated from thremal fluctuations using less than 20 cubic millimeters of space?"

      During the six months, the problem statement would be public and open to challenge so that any entity feeling that the statement poses too general a problem, or one already essentially solved, could submit a limited (say 2000 word) document explaining the challenge, and the PTO would take it into consideration. The challenger would have to pay a fee that more than covers the costs to the PTO to analyze the challenge.

      The PTO would accept or reject patent application problem statements based on whether or not the problem is specific enough and/or has already been solved. This still puts PTO analysts in a position better occupied by experts in a particular field, but rather than understanding the solution, they need only understand the problem. I think that would be an improvement.

      --
      Rank comments and posts against each other at We-Rank.com
  9. $109,000.00 by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wow...

    I'm reeling from the thought that a watch can be worth more than my whole house.

    Better not forget it in your pants come laundry day...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:$109,000.00 by Petrol · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think he arrived at the base price by adding decimal places to his patent number.

      --
      ...and that's the end of our show. Donk!
    2. Re:$109,000.00 by radon28 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better not forget it in your pants come laundry day...

      I don't know about you, but I usually wear my watch on my wrist :p

    3. Re:$109,000.00 by frovingslosh · · Score: 2
      I'm reeling from the thought that a watch can be worth more than my whole house.

      It may cost more than your whole house, that doesn't make it worth more.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:$109,000.00 by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was "or best offer". Offer the guy $20.00 for one of his ridiculous watches and he just might take it.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    5. Re:$109,000.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably reflects the price for a one of a kind, custom watch made by a master watchmaker.

      Similar to the cost of a mechanical clock when it was first invented.

    6. Re:$109,000.00 by Mateorabi · · Score: 1
      > Better not forget it in your pants come laundry day...

      Don't worry. If you use a warm wash followed by a cool rinse cycle it should be fine. :-)

      Assuming it's waterproof, which for that ammount of cash it ought'a be.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  10. i am not good in English... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the patent claim

    1. A self winding timepiece which includes a casing, a movement, a main spring for driving said movement and a winding mechanism for said main spring in said casing, an energy source for driving said winding mechanism which comprises an element subject to angular deflection in response to changes in temperature and means coupled to said element for converting angular deflection of said element to motion for driving said winding mechanism. ...more weired English to go...

    I cannot understand this claim...

    1. Re:i am not good in English... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand and neither is the patent office(r). That is why so much bullshit gets passed. Better (in the eyes of superiors) to pass it than to ask WTF it means. What the patent office needs is someone that actually reads these things for content, and, after understanding what a patent means/does, accept or reject it. For instance, look at the one-click shopping cart "idea" (patent 5,960,411). Only a moron or a "paid to pass" patent officer would NOT question that.

    2. Re:i am not good in English... by Goldenpi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Loophole spoted. This only covers energy sources which are subject to angular deflection. Use something like a smaller version of the temperature-compensated pendulum and you get liner deflection not covered by the patent. You can convert that o angular using a rack-and-gear if you need angular to drive the mechanism.

  11. Mod Parent Down by phoxix · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Can we just stop with these "Imagine a Beowulf cluster .." jokes ??

    They aren't funny anymore, nor are they imaginative at all. They are simply repetitive and nothing more.

    Sunny Dubey

    1. Re:Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia, DOWN mods PARENT!!!!!!

    2. Re:Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I can even imagine being more boring than a "beowulf cluster" joke is a post demanding it be modded down. On second thought, this post is even worse. I'm too annoyed to even finish this

    3. Re:Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The only thing that annoys me more than Soviet Russia 'jokes' are Beowulf Cluster 'jokes'. Morons...

  12. Impressive.....but a collector's item by slashuzer · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is a collector's item, more than anything else. Just look at the claims in the patent, to give you some idea of the complexity!!

    This is a cool gadget. And for those wondering about body temperature.....

    The back of a watch embodying the invention is selected to be of a good heat conductive material, which will influence the temperature at the coil. Tests utilizing a thermometer strapped to a wrist, as a watch is, have shown the following temperature variations. When the watch is on the arm for the day, it is subjected to high temperatures due to body heat (on the order of ninety-five degrees). Most watches are worn slightly loose. When the back of the watch is essentially flush on the arm the temperature is up, on the order of ninety degrees F. Due to a slight shift on the arm, the case acts as a heat sink and the temperature drops three to six degrees F. This occurs about every fifteen minutes at room temperatures of seventy-five to seventy eight degrees. In addition there are fluctuations in room temperature due to cycling of the heating or air conditioning thermostats. The changes in temperature at the watch are more frequent and at a wider range when the watch is worn outside. It was found that the temperature at the watch was ninety degrees plus five degrees and minus ten degrees on a day when the outside ambient temperature was fifty degrees, all temperatures being Fahrenheit. When the watch is removed at night and subjected only to ambient room temperature it will very quickly drop to ambient room temperature, usually about seventy degrees. During the night the temperature will cycle with fluctuation in room temperature as the thermostatically controlled heat cycles. When the wearer again puts on the watch in the morning, there will be an increase in temperature of the watch casing back up to the external body temperature of the wearer. Change in temperature in either direction will produce self-winding of a watch embodying the invention.

    Truly a perpetual watch!

    1. Re:Impressive.....but a collector's item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most certainly not perpetual. If there were no temperature variations the watch wouldn't run. Somewhere, there must be an activity occuring that produces heat. If the watch was frozen solid its temperature wouldn't change, hence the watch wouldn't run.

  13. "Eternal" Power Developed by U.S. Watchmaker by nikhilwiz · · Score: 1

    U.S. watchmaker Steven Phillips patented a power supply for mechanical watches that requires only small changes in temperature to keep the watch in continual operation.

    The first of its kind for mechanical watches, the power system is called "Eternal Winding System," and will be placed in several watches made by Phillips at his company, Budapest Watch Co., Guilford, CT.

    Under development since early 2000, and granted a worldwide patent late this year, the watch and the power supply join as the first fully mechanical wristwatch that requires neither winding nor wearing to operate.

    While several Japanese manufacturers offer watches that use temperature variations to operate quartz (non-mechanical) movements, Phillips says he is the first to develop the technology for a mechanical watch movement.

    Similar to a mechanical thermostat, where a metal coil expands and contracts depending on the air temperature, Phillips developed a metallic coil with proprietary components so sensitive they will expand or contract at the slightest temperature variation. The movement of this coil, whether expanding or contracting, is transferred to a mainspring, the heart of a mechanical watch.

    "Since there is no stopping the power, this system is well suited for perpetual watches," says Phillips, who makes the watches by hand. Phillips says the first watches using the new technology will premier at the Basel Show 2003, April 3-10. Details are in current issues of International Wristwatch magazine, a U.S.-based watch publication for consumers, www.internationalwristwatch.com. Later this month, details will be available at www.budapestwatch.com.

    by Michael Thompson

  14. Prices aren't so out of line by shoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The prices asked (a few $10000) aren't too far out of line for what is essentially a custom-built watch. I don't think that the self-winding technology is setting the price, just the low production quantities.

    For comparison, the Pulsar, the first digital watch the on the market, cost $2100. A couple years later digital watches were under $20 from Texas Instruments, and just a couple of years after that TI was out of the watch business because they couldn't compete against $4 imports.

    This isn't saying that self-winding watches will take off in the same way; it's just comparing the prices of mass-production stuff versus very low rate production.

    1. Re:Prices aren't so out of line by Henry+Stern · · Score: 1

      The diamonds set in some of them might have something to do with the high prices too. ;)

    2. Re:Prices aren't so out of line by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      I don't think that the self-winding technology is setting the price, just the low production quantities.

      New technology, limited quantity, hand made by the inventor. Case is 18 karat gold.

      There are lots of things affecting the price here.

    3. Re:Prices aren't so out of line by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Are you really trying to imply that it cost $64,000, $79,000, and $109,000 to produce each of these watches? The technology is kind of cool, I'll admit. But the whole company smacks of marketing one-ups-manship, and status symbol for the ultra-rich. People buy these sorts of things so they can display their wealth, so the more it costs and the better the name or feature that makes it cool, the more the maker can charge.

      Point being that I'm sure it cost a lot to develop the technology, make a limited run, etc. But if you're implying the price mostly reflects the cost of manufacture, I think you're dreadfully wrong.

      --
      AccountKiller
  15. As a horological enthusiast..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am used to paying top dollar for desirable time pieces, but that guy must be kidding! It seems to me that the watch being in a constant state of winding would lessen the life of the movement, and stress the main spring a lot. Nah, I mean this guy would not just develop this without some long term testing, he surely would not ignore the advice of other master watchmakers who said the movement would be short lived. I mean come on, this could not possibly be a cynical bid to gain some kudos within horological circles prior to the launch of overpriced garbage timepieces. perish the thought.

  16. Spell Checker. by dsb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At those prices, you'd think he could afford a spell checker. I've been reading the site for 5 minutes and already found 3 errors.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:Spell Checker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he's a spelling troll, you just bit.

  17. Hard to choice which one I like better.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New watch...new car...new watch...new car....

  18. body temperature by slashuzer · · Score: 1
    hmm will the body temperature affect it?

    It works on that basis. That's not so impressive. What IS impressive is that it is mechanical! See the whole thing on patent's page or my comment here.

  19. Umm why so much? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I can see they are of great quality, ( all the best timepieces ARE mechanical ) and are worth quite a bit ..

    But 100k??? That is a bit steep, even for this ....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Umm why so much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18k Gold Case, inlaid diamonds, pearl-ized hands/faces ..

      On top of a mechanism that is unique and the most practical 'perpetual' movement I've ever seen...

      Basically, he can ask any fooking price he wants :)

  20. Whoa, whoa... by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    Hey, Santa, get your fat ass down here, you forgot to give me one of those!

    Seriosuly, though, that is probably one of the coolest pieces of tech I've seen this year.

  21. better solution by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy a 9$ watch, spend 20000$ on batteries, save yourself 9991$ compared to the prices of their watches.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the technology is small enough to use with other items? IE, solar and temp powered scientific calculators. small outdoor lighting etc.

    2. Re:better solution by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how little power a watch actually requires [compared to say a decent calculator or flash light].

      What surprises me is that in this day and age we still have battery powered calculators at all. Wouldn't a decently sized solar panel [e.g. make it 2cm x 1cm and that should be enough].

      Ho hum...

      Anyways, anyone who drops 30,000$ on a watch *deserves* to know what time it is... :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:better solution by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      What surprises me is that in this day and age we still have battery powered calculators at all. Wouldn't a decently sized solar panel [e.g. make it 2cm x 1cm and that should be enough].

      That'd work fine for a 4-function calculator (or an entry-level scientific calculator), but I'd think the solar panel you would need to power (for instance) a TI-92+ or an HP 48GX would be a bit on the bulky side.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  22. pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technologically the Seiko kinetics are far more impressive and being quartz based movements wil keep better time than any mechanical. In fact a 99cents quartz watch will keep better time than the most expensive mechanical. Seems to me the primary function of a watch is to tell time, and on this front the most expensive watches are beaten by the cheapest piece of crap on the market. Money well spent!

    1. Re:pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is Seiko kinetic far more impressive? The concept of the weight inside the watch winding it has been around for many decades.

  23. Patent?! by medscaper · · Score: 2
    A patent has been awarded for this

    Criminy. They'll give patents for ANYthing these days...

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  24. 100K!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd better be able to make me eggs in the morning and pour my wine at night!

  25. I Have No Job -- And Blame Stallman For It by SteweyGriffin · · Score: 0, Troll

    If it weren't for all the free software GPL crap, Linux could have been profitable and we'd all still have jobs now.

    Linux could have been what MacOS X is today, but since it chose the path of socialism it has been relegated to the dustbin of history. To a large degree I think the FSF, and particularly Richard Stallman, are responsible for the current economic meltdown in information technology.

    Don't believe me? Read the GNU manifesto. That asshole clearly has an agenda, and it's not just about computer software.

    1. Re:I Have No Job -- And Blame Stallman For It by spybreak · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      If it weren't for all the free software GPL crap, Linux could have been profitable and we'd all still have jobs now.

      I don't think that that's entirely correct. To the contrary I think that Linux is responsible for the creation of a lot of jobs. Sure there is not a lot of money to be made in directly selling GPL software licences, however there is a a lot of service and consulting work to be had around Linux and other free* software.

      Personally I think that had Linux not been free* it would have gone the same way as BeOS and many other closed source efforts at Windows killers.

      As for the tech and telco meltdown I think that had a lot more to do with greedy opportunists pulling the wool over investors eyes to make a quick buck, not to mention systemic corporate corruption.

      Just my 2c

      * free as in freedom, not beer.

    2. Re:I Have No Job -- And Blame Stallman For It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To a large degree I think the FSF, and particularly Richard Stallman, are responsible for the current economic meltdown in information technology."

      Congratulations. This has to be the single most bizarre theory I've come across concerning Americas financial situation. You do realize that a meltdown is happening across industries and indeed the globe right now don't you? For the love of all that is holy, please read something besides a manual once in a while. It will really broaden your views.

      And if you are just making it up to troll a little with, well done! I find it more entertaining to think you're for real though!

    3. Re:I Have No Job -- And Blame Stallman For It by anonymous+coword · · Score: 0

      You have been trolled, You have lost, Have a nasty christmas!

  26. Just remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Energy ain't free. If the watch is powered by temperature fluctuations from your wrist, your wrist is going to get tired faster. For computer users, this could just excaberate any RSI problems the wearer already has.

    1. Re:Just remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, where exactly did you study physics? Barnstable school for dunces?

  27. It Was Inevitable by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

    I just unwrapped a fancy Casio "wave-ceptor" watch that synchronises with atomic clocks by radio this morning ... and now it is obsoleted!!

  28. not fp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A man goes to a doctor to get these horrible headaches treated. After examining the man the doctor tells him that the only way to get rid of his headaches is to get his testicles cut off because they are pressing against his spinal chord. Very distraught, the man agrees that anything is better than the headaches.

    Four weeks later, after a successful operation and recovery, the man feels physically great, but depressed, so he decides to do something that will make him feel better. He chooses to buy some designer suits that will boost his morale and his image.

    He goes downtown to a high dollar men's shop, and as he's looking around, a salesman asks him if he's in the market for a designer suit or two. And the man is surprised, but he nods and the salesman says, I'm sure you'll like this new line we just got. You probably wear size 32"- 29" slacks, jacket size 42 long and shirt size 16 34-35.

    The man is dumbfounded, and he asks, how did you know that? The sales man says, I do this for a living, it's my job. Then the salesman says, I can tell that you like blue, and that you have a preference for pinstripes. The man is totally surprised and says, Well yes, that is all absolutely correct! How could you know all that? And the salesman just says, well, it's my job to know, I'm a professional.

    So the man tries the suit that the salesman picked, and sure enough it fits like a glove and he loves the color and the fabric. The man says, you are something else! You picked exactly what I wanted and it couldn't fit better!

    The salesman then says, how about some shoes? I can tell that you wear a 9 ½ AA shoe, and you prefer black wingtips. The man is just amazed by now. How could you possibly know those things? And the salesman tells him that he's just doing his job. He tries the shoes on and they look and fit great.

    The man is feeling very good by now and he says, now all I need is some underwear. So the salesman says, sure, you wear size 32 boxer style underwear, and the man then says, NO! I got you! I've been wearing size 28 brief style underwear for the past 20 years! And the salesman says, well I would really advise you not to do that. You can get some f***ing wicked headaches that way.

  29. Memory metals?? by t0qer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a link,
    Here's a link,
    why don't I just

    link the google search page?


    Anyone remember memory metals? They were sort of a greeting card fad for a
    while..You would mail a loved one what looked like an unbent paper clip, with
    instructions to dip it into hot coffee. Upon hitting the hot coffee the metal
    would bend itself into a message. Really neat stuff if you ever got to play with
    it.


    1. Re:Memory metals?? by prisoner · · Score: 2

      You know, when I was a kid I remember reading about these in some magazine. The article indicated that NASA was running a contest (sort of). Send in an idea of how to use these things and they'd send you a piece. Didn't matter how dumb the idea was (it *was* a kids magazine). My friend and I sent in ideas, he got his piece of wire and I never got mine. Bastards. Never got his wire to do much anyways...

    2. Re:Memory metals?? by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 1

      The stuff isn't gone yet-- my glasses are made out of memory metal. It's fun bending them in half to suprise people.

    3. Re:Memory metals?? by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure this invention doesn't use memory metals. From skimming the patent, the power source for this watch movement seems to be a bimetallic coil spring. The different coefficients of thermal expansion of the metals cause the spring to coil or uncoil when it is heated or cooled. An escapement mechanism is probably used to connect this spring to the mechanical movement, so that regardless of whether the spring is coiling or uncoiling, it winds the watch.

      All in all, I have to say its a pretty clever idea, but I'm surprised no one thought of it before. Bimetallic strips have been used to regulate mercury switches in thermostats for many years, and most mechanical clock and watches need an escapement so that the swinging of the pendulum or the oscillation of the spring only drives the movement forward and not backward.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:Memory metals?? by psyconaut · · Score: 2

      I have a couple of spools of ninitinol (sp?) somewhere. A memory metal that contracts or expands when you apply current.

      -psy

  30. Not the first... by dbitter1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My (now departed) grandfather recieved an Omega watch as a retirement present ~1950. It, too, never required winding and sure as hell wasn't $10K (or whatever, adjusted for inflation)

    . I never bothered to open it and play with it, but he said it had something to do with the pendulum action of your arms... Still works like a charm today.

    --
    For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    1. Re:Not the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called an automatic and it self winds because there is a winding wheel mounted at the to of the movement that moves when you do. Most mechannicals nowadays are automatic. However automatics must be worn to continue running (they have about 30 hours reserve winding). This watch will run even if unworn, but it is grossly overpriced, poorly built and of little horological significance.

    2. Re:Not the first... by thelexx · · Score: 2

      What fucking dictionary are you using?

      horology (hô-rl-j) n.

      1. The science of measuring time.
      2. The art of making timepieces.

      So this guy made a watch that just runs, forever, without a battery, movement, or purposeful interaction of any kind, a feat never before accomplished by anyone, and it's of 'no horological significance'. You are an ass.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    3. Re:Not the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like 40hr reserve and the winding wheel is a not technically a pendulum but it is a weight that swings with movement.

    4. Re:Not the first... by laymil · · Score: 1

      hes not the first to do it. he's just the first to do it mechanically. kthx. YOU are an ass.

  31. Re:LAST NIGGER! KILL THE NIGGERS! MOTHERFUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you will find most people have goatse.cx in the old hosts.deny file.

  32. $109,000.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that too much to ask for saving your environment?

  33. ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to look up the difference between physics and physiology sometime. And while I may not have a physics degree, I have picked up quite a lot by reading the posts of Slashdot's own PhysicsGenius.

  34. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are already Citizen Eco-Drive solar powered watches and Seiko Kinetic motion-powered watches. Why would there be demand for this?

  35. I'll stick with my Dad's by craenor · · Score: 2

    Rolex...17 years old and still sweeping (Rolex's don't tick).

    1. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by Crazy+Diamond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes they do. At 8 times per second that comes to 28800 ticks per hour. All mechanical watches "sweep" with some slower than 28800vph, and some faster.

      If you have a Rolex you should be able to actually see the ticks and if you put it up to your ear, you can hear and actually count the 8 ticks per second.

    2. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by craenor · · Score: 2

      Actually I realized that, I was more alluding to the distinctive tick of Quartz movement in a play on words from the Timex commercials, takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

      Also made in reference to the fact that the primary means of telling most fake Rolexs from real ones is the Quartz movement that most fake ones have.

    3. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Rolex's don't tick

      A more correct statement would be, "Most Rolex's don't tick." Some of their older models most certainly do.

    4. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 1

      Wait a few years and this invention might be *in* a Rolex. Steven Phillips is actively shopping his invention around to various big watch companies. If one of them bites then you'll see $3K watches with this technology in it.

      - HCE

    5. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 1

      Er - that slogan *is* about mechanical watches. AFAIK, that was first coined when there was no such thing as a quartz wristwatch. - HCE

  36. This has been done (on a larger scale) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automatically winding clocks (using temperature or pressure variations) have been around for hundreds of years. We even have one here in the Auckland War Memorial Museum.

    This is a very, very cool device but really what use is it? I have a mechanical watch. I wake up every morning, I wind it and every so often I sync the time to GPS. Not that difficult. And as a self confessed computer geek it is about the only exercise I get!

    I like the bits in the patent about the Patek Philippe automatic watch that will run for seven days without being worn. Again very cool but why apart from the fact that very rich people can buy them then go to posh parties and say I haven't worn this watch for 6 days and it is still going! You'd bloody expect so for a watch costing that much money!

    I think Slashdot should lay off the rich bastards watch stories until we get laser watches like James Bond has in Never say never again.

  37. My Idea for a watch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't I come up with a wristwatch that winds itself from the swipe of only a Platinum American Express Card in an integrated cardreader. It would bill USD100 every swipe. Would that be exclusive enough for some pretentious prick to show off to his pretentious prick friends? Huh? Would it? Jesus Christ.

    G.

  38. Christmas- Science creates new face of Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article(From science and computers, a new face of Jesus) on CNN website shows the face of Jesus re-created by scientists. "The Jesus plastered on the cover of this month's Popular Mechanics has a broad peasant's face, dark olive skin, short curly hair and a prominent nose. He would have been 5-foot-1-inch tall and weighed 110 pounds, if the magazine is to be believed...". I am glad that scientists are working hard to bring the real truth to life and dispel the existing myths.

  39. Christmas: Science creates new face of Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article(From science and computers, a new face of Jesus) on CNN website shows the face of Jesus re-created by scientists. "The Jesus plastered on the cover of this month's Popular Mechanics has a broad peasant's face, dark olive skin, short curly hair and a prominent nose. He would have been 5-foot-1-inch tall and weighed 110 pounds, if the magazine is to be believed...".

  40. Sure I can afford one! by JPhule · · Score: 0

    I figure I've never been struck by lightning, broken a bone or won any other contests so my odds of winning the Powerball tonight are pretty good, no? And what the Hell, mechanical watches for the Slashdot crew!



    Free as in Beer, cause this rounds on me.

  41. See also 'Atmos clocks' by xof · · Score: 1

    See also Google('atmos clock').

    Well, it's a little heavier than a wristwatch ;-), but it is also a temperature powered clock manufactured since the late 1920's (history of the Atmos clock).

    1. Re:See also 'Atmos clocks' by AceyMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Atmos movement is powered not by thermal changes, but by pressure changes. There is a sort of 'bellows' on the back that gets cycled by barometric changes, which in turn winds the mainspring. Being a product of Jaeger LeCoultre, one of the top watch houses in Europe, they are (a) expensive, and (b) beautiful. I love mine.

      --
      -- Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
    2. Re:See also 'Atmos clocks' by NortWind · · Score: 1
      Actually, the Atmos movement is powered not by thermal changes, but by pressure changes.

      The Atmos clock is powered by both pressure and temperature changes. Check out the history of the Atmos clock.

  42. screw the watch, give me that power supply! by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    Excellent, now we finally can have mechanical power generated from temperature fluctuations. All we need now is some sort of a machine to convert mechanical power into electrical and we have a new type of energy generator... hmmmm ... but where to get such a machine?!

  43. This is NOT new. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    While these custom watches are, the idea and principals themself are not. Nor is this a new fad or anything else, I still have a mechanical watch from 1955, that requires no winding.

    Funny enough, it's a Timex. It was my grandfathers, and I still wear it. After 20 years in the foundry of grit, grime, grunge, and other assorted toxic chemicals, it still works as good as the day he bought it.

    I won't be surpised if this is moderated as redundant. If you feel it is, reply. It's easy to moderate, wiser to reply with something witty or intellegent.

    --
    Be a smart poster, always check "No Score +1 Bonus"

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:This is NOT new. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

      Yep, you're right. I was just about to make a similar post myself.

      The temperature differential thing is new and neat, but other types of self-winding mechanical watches have been around for more than fifty years.

      I have a handsome "Clipper Automatic" watch that my father used to wear all the time. Like most self-winding watches it's kept wound by movement of the arm and wrist. The mechanism still works even after years of sitting forgotten in a drawer.

  44. Self Pleasurement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sure hope the time won't start going faster when my wrist warms up from jackin off! ;) ;)

  45. I you get killed... by PineGreen · · Score: 2

    ... you would automatically help the investigators by telling them when exactly have you died....

    1. Re:I you get killed... by jayratch · · Score: 1

      Read the article. That will only apply if you die in a freezer... most self-winders are powered by motion, this is not. That is the point of the patent, that it is a different, innovative way to power a watch.

      Granted, it seems like an out of place innovation.. with all sorts of electronic perpetuals out there, using thermal or solar, or motion, including $300 Citizens that can operate unworn for 3 years, this doesn't exactly solve a problem that's out on the real-world market. But for the wealthy who MUST have a status symbol watch, this is a new way to set one up.

      But it won't stop when you do, and that's just the point.

    2. Re:I you get killed... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      ... Assuming you died in a place where the temperature never changes... like a vacuum?

  46. The watch isn't the point by Migelikor1 · · Score: 2

    This device is able to use human body heat to create enough usable energy to drive a fairly simple mechanical device.

    Let's extend this, playing futurist a bit. The same technology is applied to all the interior surfaces of your clothes, meaning that all your radiated body heat is put to use. Now, your wearable technologies need either smaller batteries, since they are trickle charged all day long by your body heat. Maybe your clothes have an air conditioner built in driven by body heat, maybe you just power a flat panel PDA on your wrist.

    I'd keep an eye on this type of technology...reclaiming wasted energy could have huge implications for portable technologies of all kinds.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:The watch isn't the point by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      ...winter clothing that use the much higher heat difference between the side next to the body and the side next to the winter cold while maintaining an usefull insulation...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:The watch isn't the point by Melchior · · Score: 1

      Just as an argument on the air-conditioner side of things-- this device can't generate energy unless there's a temperature difference between the wearer's body temp and the outside temp. If you were in an environment where it's hot enough for an air conditioner to be worthwhile, chances are the temp difference between yourself and the outside world won't be enough to make any sort of air conditioner run. If the outside temperature is equal to your body temperature, the device is incapable of generating power. If the temperature outside is greater than that of your body, you have to be able to *absorb* more heat into your body in order to generate the power to run an air conditioner, which would make you pretty damn hot.

  47. TimeZone - site for watch geeks by Nelson+Minar · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're into mechanical watches, check out www.timezone.com. It's a website for watch geeks with an active message board.

    The Steven Phillips watches built here look awfully impressive. Too bad about the style, particularly the enamelling. There's a reason perlage is the standard movement decoration.

  48. Do people still wear watches? by FattMattP · · Score: 2

    Do people still wear watches? With all of the devices that surround us every day that give the time and date, I'm surprised that watches are are sold and used any more.

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    1. Re:Do people still wear watches? by BitchHead · · Score: 1

      I work in a lab with no windows, and I can't see the clock from my fume hood. On really busy days, my 11:00 watch alarm is the only reason that I remember to eat. I've also had our Validations department calibrate the stopwatch function on my watch using a NIST traceable timer so I can use it as an ISO approved assay timer. I like my watch.
      Damned if I'd spend 100K+ on one though...

  49. Why not a "regular" mechanical wristwatch? by MikeyNg · · Score: 1

    Self-winding mechanical wristwatches have been around for decades. Granted, you have to wear it in order for them to wind themselves, but if you're going to pay $100,000 for a watch, you probably won't have more than one of them. (Well, although if you have $100,000 to spend on a wristwatch, you probably have $1,000,000 to spend on ten.)

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
  50. prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stirling engine anyone?

    1. Re:prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, when anyone mentioned "stirling engine" to me, the word "wristwatch" would always immediately jump to mind.

  51. interesting... by s0rbix · · Score: 0

    theres a much cheaper way to tell time... simply ask a stranger. wow, i think i just saved each and every one of you 100,000.

  52. american eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He lives in the US but he is hungarian + most US ppl have no idea where Budapest is... [ look at the name of his company]

  53. Think Geek by dirvish · · Score: 2

    They are just trying to get us fired up about so that when they start selling next month on thinkgeek they will make a load of money.

  54. This is actually fairly significant by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a much more detailed write-up on this in International Wrist Watch magazine (they have a website but the article is not there). Imagine an automatic wristwatch that does not even have to be wound but stays running all the time!

    What's more, a "side-effect" of this is that the watch has become vastly more accurate. The rate at which mechanical watches run is dependent on the tension in the mainspring - and since that isn't constant (even in regularly worn automatic watches) mechanical watches (even the most accurate ones) tend to lose or gain a few seconds a day.

    The "eternal winding" mechanism somehow manages to keep the tension in the mainspring fairly constant - so the watch's rate varies a lot less and it ends up being about as accurate as a quartz watch!

    The ridiculous price is only because these are a limited edition set of watches made by the inventor. According to the article, he intends to sell his patent to a bug watch manufacturer. If Rolex or Omega, for instance, gets hold of it, they will probably incorporate these in their regular watches and the price will, in time, come down to the same as regular Rolex/Omega prices (which aren't exactly cheap but not this expensive either).

    - HCE

    1. Re:This is actually fairly significant by mtec · · Score: 2

      he intends to sell his patent to a bug watch manufacturer.

      I'm picturing a cockroach with a tiny little Rolex...

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  55. A collectable. Also a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drop US$3k on a stainless steel Rolex. They're perfect. Newtonian. As obsolete the day you buy it as your computer was.

    It's also one of the few possessions your grandkids are going to fight over when your dead. :)

  56. Other applications, like space exploration. by Guppy · · Score: 1

    I can think of some other applications for this device. For instance, aboard satellites and space probes -- many planets experience extreme fluctuations in temperature during their days (assuming this is a planet with a usable day length), and satellites will experience temperature fluctations as they pass in and out of earth's shadow.

    While these are basically the sort of things we us solar panels for now, this has the potential to be more robust and compact -- or maybe not, but they would still have certain advantages. For instance, on Mars, solar panels may suffer from dust deposition, while this wouldn't. They also wouldn't suffer as much from the effects of radiation exposure. On the other hand, I don't know how well it would scale up.

    There might be some terrestrial applications, too. For instance, for research you might want to power a sensor (temperature, wind speed, etc) in some remote location. Solar works fine when you're out in the open, but something like this could work in the middle of a shady forest, too.

  57. Wow! by mtec · · Score: 2


    That is so cool! Uh, wait!
    No, no it's so hot, uh, cool...wait!

    *ducks*

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  58. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it takes a lickin...?

  59. The watch is beside the point... by mtec · · Score: 2


    It's the innovative power supply and it's potential uses, silly.

    Why, this is close to a perpetual motion machine (and temperature variations abound)....

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  60. Well said... by mtec · · Score: 2

    I can't believe how many here don't understand the significance..

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  61. This is Such Bullshit...the Technology is Old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it Bullshit again? BECAUSE THIS GUY RIPPED OFF ANOTHER INVENTOR, THAT'S WHY.

    Now, have I got your attention?

    Good.

    See, the problem is that the "perpetual-winding" concept for this watch is not new. Indeed, it's quite old. J.L. Reuter produced a clock that used the exact same mechanism - temperature-change winding power in 1928. It was called the Atmos and is still sold today. Let me repeat this: THIS TECHNOLOGY WAS FIRST USED NEARLY 80 YEARS AGO, BEFORE THIS SO-CALLED "INNOVATIVE WATCHMAKER" WAS EVEN BORN. Again, sorry for the shouting, but this fact really has to be made quite clear.

    Basicly, all this guy did was to miniaturize the mechanism and place it one a fancy wristwatch. That particular idea was his - but as for the themal mechanism itself, which both the patent and the website tout so grandly - isn't.

    Can someone say "pattent infringement"?

    I surely can.

    But hey, don't take my word for it:

    http://www.oldfathertime.net/atmos/atmos.html

    or simply look up "Atmos" on your favorite search engine.

    ZZZ Online also had a nice bit on the Atmos a couple of weeks ago.

    Really, I can't wait until some busts this guy's ass. His watches are nice, don't get me wrong - but the patent simply isn't his, and so he's effectively stealing from another more deserving person and his benefactors.

    1. Re:This is Such Bullshit...the Technology is Old! by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 1

      Mind telling me how one can put an Atmos on one's wrist? As you say, the Atmos has been around 80 years. Did it occur to you that there is a reason why in all that time, no one made a wristwatch based on similar principles.

      The fact is that they cannot. The atmos has a chamber filled with gas - the expansion and contraction of which winds the mainspring. There is no way such a chamber could be made small enough to fit inside a wristwatch.

      This patent uses a completely different mechanism to achieve the same effect. He did not "miniaturize" the atmos technology. Even if he did, it would be a remarkable achievement - a small-time watchmaker being able to do what one of the world's premier mechanical watch companies could not do for 80 years.

      - HCE

  62. I'll stick with my Seiko Kinetic, thanks by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Basically it derives energy from the temperature change when the watch is on top of your arm (flush against the skin == hotter) and when it's flopped to the side (exposed to air == cooler). In other words, it still needs motion to operate, albeit indirectly.

    Hence, my trusty kinetic watch is effectively equivalent but a lot more affordable.

    1. Re:I'll stick with my Seiko Kinetic, thanks by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Uh, no! The seiko kinetic has a internal weight mounted on a bearing that rotates as the watch is moved, turning a miniature electric generator that recharges some storage device. If you put the watch up to your ear you can hear the weight moving.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
  63. Quality Reflects by BasicOp · · Score: 0

    The price should depend on the quality/uniqueness of the product. This is somewhat of a unique way of keeping time.
    I personally believe that if the quality is high enough a price as high as $10 000 should not be considered out of question. My father owns a Rolex self-winding watch.
    The watch picks up the vibrations of the moving wrist to wind its gears.

  64. Re:A good patent - NOT by xtronics · · Score: 1

    I have seen temperture winding clocks from back in the 1960 - 1970 time frame. This has prior art.

  65. Re:A good patent - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has prior art.

    Indeed. My neighbour has a mechanical clock that winds due to temperature changes, and he he has had it for a long damn time.

  66. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would probably be more like a Mechanical Engineering grad, and less like, say for instance, a pupil to a mentor/reknowned expert. Invention doesn't require genius. In many cases it merely requires being the first person to identify a problem and propose a workable solution.

  67. Different strokes for different folks by salientpoints · · Score: 1

    /. guys will power it by friction. ;)

    no more asking me what time it is to get my attention

  68. Been done, never should have gotten a patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was done YEARS ago , starting in the 20's
    A french clock called the Atmos uses atmoshperics variations to do this BUT the same company also built one based on temperature, for a clock not such a good idea since youre hope is that a room will remain the same, barometric pressure is another way, the clocks are still made, (i have one from the 30's) neat as heck, check em out on ebay search for Atmos, They are so precise and handbuilt the wattage conversion to run a clock for a year equates to what energy is required to drive a 60 watt bulb for 10 minutes. Pretty swee,

    WARNING: this is no Joke (Do not EVER turn an Atmos clock upside down, without parking the movement it will damage the clock (my favorite part is ther is a decal on the BOTTOM of the clock that says this) so if youre reading it its already too late.....

  69. Temperature fluctuations? by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    Sooo... the watch will work from temperatue fluctuations from the environment, the human body or both (sorry, did not read the patent)?

    If it is the human body, doesn't it sounds like The Matrix's Duracell-human battery analogy :^) ? We could attach a gigantic watch into a cow and we'd have energy for a small house!!!!

  70. Re:not perpetual by human+bean · · Score: 2

    If you stopped eating for long enough, I bet that the watch would stop also...

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

  71. Re:A good patent - NOT by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I have seen temperture winding clocks from back in the 1960 - 1970 time frame. This has prior art.

    Clocks, perhaps...but watches? Given the difficulties often encountered when trying to scale mechanical systems down to smaller sizes, I doubt that claiming a thermally-powered clock as prior art WRT a patent on a thermally-powered watch would fly.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  72. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    What they said:
    What they meant:

    "You will be fortunate if you can get him to work for you."
    (We certainly never succeeded.)
    There is no other employee with whom I can adequately compare him.
    (Well, our rats aren't really employees...)
    "Success will never spoil him."
    (Well, at least not MUCH more.)
    "One usually comes away from him with a good feeling."
    (And such a sigh of relief.)
    "His dissertation is the sort of work you don't expect to see these days;
    in it he has definitely demonstrated his complete capabilities."
    (And his IQ, as well.)
    "He should go far."
    (The farther the better.)
    "He will take full advantage of his staff."
    (He even has one of them mowing his lawn after work.)

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...