Slashdot Mirror
Christmas in 2050
Makarand writes "A robotic kitchen assistant will help you with the Christmas
meal preparations while you recieve instructions and monitoring assistance in real time from information systems for the cooking.
Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes
needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently
well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians.
This is what we
can expect this time in 2050 says Ian Pearson, BT's futurologist who is paid to dream,
in this BBC News article.
Absent family will join the celebrations
virtually. There might be technology allowing us to read each
others minds and being able to know what others are thinking may
not always add peace and harmony to the celebrations.
However on the upside, it will make charades a whole lot easier you will never get unwanted Christmas presents.
Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever,
so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents."
We were hearing about this in the 1940's. Sooo where's our jet packs, personal helicopters, and automated kitchens?
Seriously, I think the people that dream up this stuff reduce the time to market by a factor of at least three. The dreams are great and all, but obviously not realistic.
funny munging
"thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians."
:) Then i can finally cook real meals for myself!
thats great, a few of my friends are vegan and I always which they could have a little more then tofurkey!!!
i wonder when we will have replicators
...and just how are we going to have Christmas in another 48 years if Bush, Saddam, North Korea, et al. are just itching for a nuclear holocaust...?
Yah...it'll be a white christmas....but I don't think the fourteen living bacteria will really give a damn... =P
Will we even remember what half this crap is in 2050?
So what does all these Popular Science-like predictions have to do with AMD?
MAKE YOUR TIME
When I was a kid in the '50s, the futurists predicted routine space travel by now, commuting by flying automobiles, the hyrdrogen economy, copious nuclear power production, intelligent robots, oh - and the end of the world by nuclear war.
Hmmm...
And they missed the information age, microchips, the sexual revolution, the civil rights movement, the air bag in cars, AIDS, velcro and genetic engineering.
So much for futurists.
The only good weather is bad weather.
Why is the article icon AMD's? I don't see any relation to the scrappy little semiconductor company in any of this. If anything, I would expect that we'd have the Christmas Tree icon here, or the Technology icon.
Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
I remember when I was in second grade. They told us we were going to be the class of 2000. They made us do a little project on what we thought the world would be like in 2000. I did my project on flying cars. I made a car that transformed from wheels to wings with construx. And the class was pretty unanimous on moving sidewalks. Guess what, it's not the jetsons, but it is the internet.
Predicting the future is fun, but I'd put more stake in science fiction becoming true than what any official predictor says.
The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
Why not be nice and give gifts to people who need/deserve them throughout the year?
It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
I moderate therefore I rule!
--
New technology is far more likely to be very sensible, merely adding more "grunt" to what we have already, with a few sub-innovations here and ithere. As a people we are already discovering what we want; Fast data communications, medcine, digitalization, AI (a huge umbrella), time savers, entertainment etc.
Let's start being more specific, choose certain already established technology and predict where it will go. All tyhe best technology evolves from working with what we have. We should try and built the bridges before we try to cross them.
*sigh* I've began to sound like a whining, ranting Slashdotter more every day.
What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
There might be technology allowing us to read each others minds...
Great... I can envision myself being bankrupted the first time I get a song stuck in my head for an entire day-- because I'm sure the RIAA will buy the laws to make them privy to my thoughts, and will demand a licensing fee for each separate instance that I thought about the song.
~Philly
Zager Evans
....(fading...)
In The Year 2525
In the year 2525
If man is still alive
If woman can survive
They may find
In the year 3535
Ain't gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
Everything you think, do, and say
Is in the pill you took today
In the year 4545
Ain't gonna need your teeth, won't need your eyes
You won't find a thing chew
Nobody's gonna look at you
In the year 5555
Your arms are hanging limp at your sides
Your legs got not nothing to do
Some machine is doing that for you
In the year 6565
Ain't gonna need no husband, won't need no wife
You'll pick your son, pick your daughter too
From the bottom of a long glass tube
In the year 7510
If God's a-comin' he ought to make it by then
Maybe he'll look around himself and say
Guess it's time for the Judgement day
In the year 8510
God is gonna shake his mighty head
He'll either say I'm pleased where man has been
Or tear it down and start again
In the year 9595
I'm kinda wondering if man is gonna be alive
He's taken everything this old earth can give
And he ain't put back nothing
Now it's been 10,000 years
Man has cried a billion tears
For what he never knew
Now man's reign is through
But through the eternal night
The twinkling of starlight
So very far away
Maybe it's only yesterday
In the year 2525
If man is still alive
If woman can survive
They may find
In the year 3535
Ain't gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
Everything you think, do or say
Is in the pill you took today
Doesn't it seem like Ian Pearson gets to take the piss at BT (and our) expense?
-psy
"Absent family will join the celebrations virtually."
......right? :( I want flying cars that everyone will be able to afford already! , No, I don't care about traffic or people not being able to fly them properly, I want the flying cars I was promised!
Why join us virtually? They should be able to join us virtually becuase they'll "fly" here with their flying cars right?
psst.. wake up, wake up!
[alk]
CmdrTaco, Jr., is now 40 years old and running Slashdot. He posts repeat stories using his Linux Tablet PC, which is of course illegal since Linux's source code compromises Intellectual Property. All of the major companies have merged into a single company which most people believe runs the country. George Bush, IV, along with "Lil" Fritz Hollings pass a law mandating quotas of consumer involvement. The war on terror has not ended but that's ok since the country has rallied behind mini-Bush.
Ahh, what days lie ahead. I can't wait!
... but when i saw it, it was on a "Popular Science" short from 1960 about how we'd be living in 1990. :P
A robotic kitchen assistant will help you with the Christmas meal preparations while you recieve instructions and monitoring assistance in real time from information systems for the cooking.
But will he look like Robin Williams?
To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
It's amusing to see this sort of thing. Implicit are assumptions made about how current behavior will not change, but will itself be applied, or adopted wholesale, to new technology.
m l getting ready to give a hearty "heave-ho,ho'ho" to most of the predictions in the reported article.
This is, in fact, the reverse of what happens.
We saw this sort of thing in the 50's with predictions about vacuum cleaner robots, almost always accompanied by an image of a very happy woman (assumed to be a housewife). No one could imagine the Women's Movement just one decade hence.
We will (see Kurzweil) experience ever increasing rates of change in technology over the next 50 years; along with that will be slower (but faster than linear) changes in human behavior. The latter are the *really* hard predictions.
One nice change might be to find a way to do away with the compulsive consumption (the latter word used to mean both "using things up" and "deadly disease") that defines our most popular holiday (in the West), and turn it into something more functional, useful, and fulfilling. (btw, all the latter adjectives imply massive behavior change as well, which might happen as the developed world begins to learn the lesson about what 'enough' is).
In keeping with the season, here's 'Santabot' http://mywebpages.comcast.net/ctrevas/santabot.ht
Virtual Hot Grits will be the to-get gift of the season.
Linux will be ready for the desktop, but all the desktops will have shrunk to fit in a pill that you swallow.
The entire B*ush family will have died from a drug overdose.
Cheney's heart will continue beating in a small bell jar at the McDonalds Intel Smithsonian.
Michael Jackson will have transparent skin, and have Liz Taylors uterus 'installed' to give birth to an endless stream of monkeys.
Music will be beamed directly into your head, and tinfoil hats make a fashion comeback.
Steven Speilbergs 'Taken' will be on its final installment.
The music industry finally disposes with allusion and inference, and two new acts hit the stage: Britney Bigtits and the boy band "Humpin' Yer Daughters"
Slashdot's Karma will actually apply to real life, and trolls are forced to live underground, cracking human bones for the tasty marrow inside.
Reality shows will move into your own home, with prizes for the 'best'(dysfuntional) family.
The first frozen dead guy is revived, and by an incredible twist of fate, is named 'Fry'.
Dick Clark will be suspended in ammniotic fluid. Just for the hell of it.
The U.S., long since disbanded for mismanagement, will relocate to Kamchaka, and attempt to defend all those borders.
Steven King will be found dead in his home. Even if you didn't like his books, you have to admit the affect he had on late 20th century literature.
Cmdr Taco's daughter will run Slashdot, and in hopes of giving her a better life than he had, he will buy her a dictionary chip.
Go Carts will still be fun, but pale in comparison to GyroCarts which will be super strong, cool and powerful.
Soviet Russia will be a new Disney/AOL/TimeWarner/Microsoft/RedHat theme park, where the attractions ride YOU. Ok. It's a whorehouse.
Steve Balmer will live his dream, starring in "Gorillas in the Mist: Lard of the Jungle"
Grand Theft Auto 2050 is released. It's not a game anymore.
Duke Nukem (We Told Ya!) is finally released, and it like totally blows.
What did you feed him?
Hot Dogs.
What an old idea.
If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
And there is good new for vegetarians, with turkey dinner being artificial, thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology.
Apparently scientists will by then have understood the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey sufficiently well to make a good replica.
...does anybody care about vegetarians that much??
genetically-engineered Furbies
I didn't know plastic had genes to engineer in the first place...
He so totally forgot to mention shamanic magic, orks, and the Matrix.
At least there will still be trolls, regardless of what happens.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
Such a thing will only happen with the consent of all involved, including said "celebrators" of Christmas.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
I honestly think that the difference between 2050 and 2002 will not be as drastic as 1950 and now.
IMHO...robots will be available (well they technically are in the capacity of that 'Cye' thingy), but in the capacity of tablet pcs or segways are now (Neat, useful, but expensive and somewhat impractical).
Things will have improved, sure, but I wont be expecting a Christmas list include a G10 Titanium Laptop with a Terabyte of RAM and 100 Ghz Proc. Or to be able to browse pr0n in with my implant. Or even to have the US as a totalarian state.
Things with slow down, they already are. Even most tech. companies admit so.
This guys been reading to much lit. from the 50s
forget it.
In every example you gave, they all had a quantity that you are measuring, such as price or megahertz. It should be abundantly clear that innovation of new products doesn't fit this model, since there is no way to score it. Also you are only able to measure stable activities and innovation isn't stable, but veyr chaotic.
Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians.
I thought a good chunk of vegetarians were that way more because of the health benefits of not eating meat. Creating a perfect artificial turkey would still come with all the side effects of eating real ones.
Guess this could possibly help out the extreme vegans though, who don't want anything that came from processed animal products at all - assuming these 'molecular processes' work on 100% non-animal products.
Oh well, futurists are always amusing.
Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
Yes, they exist. They also taste nothing like turkey and are far more expensive.
We cooked for ~100 people for Thanksgiving, got turkeys for 95 people for about $25 (good deal) - then had to get a $20 tofurkey for the 5 vegans.
Grr.
Gardening? You mean, using an analog method to bypass Mom's Friendly Food Co's copyright on the products of their patented Food(r) process? You're lucky I don't notify the FBI!
Honestly, what is the point of even mentioning a time so far ahead of us... obviously it has been proven that we aren't exactly realistic when describing the future... not to mention the only things that ever seem to get mentioned are the economic/technological aspects of the future... what about the arts, what about peoples' attitudes.. these things all change drastically in such a great amount of time.. which makes it nearly impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy what the future will be like.. so why not live for the moment instead?
You're nothing; like me.
Strangely enough, the Hindu far-right also talks of Hindu festivals such as Deepavali, Dussehra becoming extinct in the face of relentless evangelisation from the Christian far-right. And they, indeed, echo the Muslim far-right's concerns over young Muslim girls not wearing hijab, eating non-haleem meat, not celebrating Id-ul-Fitr with "proper" gaiety...
Face it; it's not just (underground real) Christians under "threat".
More than mere navel gazing.
...by feeding it to a small turkey, until said turkey is big enough to eat.
A real "advance" would be the growth of free range and organic farming -- doing away with industrial farming techniques that involve shutting animals into crates, cramming them with chemical- and antibiotic-laden feed, and generally turning them into objects instead of living beings.
Many people who now object to eating meat might change their minds, if they felt that the animals they consumed were raised in a healthy manner and treated humanely.
I eat some meat, but try to steer clear of the more factory-farmed stuff in favor of organic/free-range products. It's preferable in so many ways: hygeinically, nutritionally, ethically, etc.
Now think about the point at which computing will be a mature technology.
That's right, all of the people of the world. FOr, while we don't have Russian communism anymore, there's still China. There's still nuclear-war style tension in the world, and now it's swept under the rug. At least during the cold war it was a fear the government couldn't avoid (so they exploited it). American Imperialism is at it's worst ever, and getting worse every day, and the American Police State is getting closer. As a result of American Imperialism, we now have a "war on terrorism" to replace the *lost* "war on drugs" (not that I'm saying we did the wrong thing and the terrorists are right, I just think that the war on terrorism is the same political ballgame that the war on drugs was, and may well be used in a catalystic fashion to bring on the police state) It won't be too long before Russa will be fighting us again in a cold war, and they'll be the ones fighting for freedom (or so the press will read, anyway).
Of course, my predictions have as much validity as the article's. :)
Like what I said? You might like my music
I found most of the projections timid.
The "kitchen assistant" stuff is largely available in component form (mixers, ovens, etc. that can sync to a recipe and will tell the chef what to put in when, monitor quantities of ingredients, turn the oven on to a defined time/temperature, etc.) NOW. Ambitious would be to project that we'll have fully automated kitchens. That can be done in today's technology, though not in a form that'll fit a household kitchen. In the 2050 fast food restaurant, you'll be able to get things ranging from the current menu to anything available at the 5 star restaurants of today, but fast food restaurants will have disappeared as a separate category whose memory will linger only in brand names. Restaurants with human cooks and service will be considered superpremium places and will have prices to match.
"there will be screens lining the wall."
The price of flat-panel display technology is dropping and the availability is increasing. OLED is screen-printed, not vacuum deposited.
Do you really think that videophones that can be attached to the network aren't going to be available for the price of a cheap one-piece deskphone now, and that the problems building a Net appliance that'll be secure and "Just Works" and of universal broadband availability won't be solved in 48 years?
With the exception of thought recording and transference hardware, everything discussed is in either research or early pre-alpha. It is hardly the author's fault you haven't been paying attention, most of what's in the article has been bloglinked from here.
The problem with this kind of futurism is that the futurist considers the future to be a linear extension of the present... while his predictions might be accurate, they look more like 2012 than 2050 to me.
The problems with a robotic household all-purpose servant that can use human tools will be solved by then, but people may be so used to intelligent point-solution household appliances (automated vacuum cleaners, etc.) that nobody will care.
The writer doesn't deal with space at all. One prediction I'm certain of. Either the human race will be exploiting the Solar System as a whole by then or nobody will have pleasant Xmases by then, people will be too busy suffering the kind of deprivations that go with cultures in a state of permanent war, in this case, over who gets enough of the Earth's dwindling resources of materials required to sustain technological society in order to keep one. I'm not talking about oil here, by then, we won't have a technological culture burning oil for fuel. That's why auto manufacturers are converting their assembly lines over to high-efficiency or fuel-cell vehicles. Even Toyota, who's going over to superefficient hybrid engines says that the vehicles are intended for easy conversion to fuel cells.
However, some dreams are less likely than others. The problem with a personal jet pack is sort of obvious, a device that has to provide all its lift as well as forward motion via reaction sucks up a hell of a lot of fuel.
Will we ever find the exceptions or reinterpetation of physical law that'll make a starship possible? I certainly don't know. Check the NASA "Warp Drive When" site for their Advanced Propulsion project for the latest.
Tech Public Policy stuff
What really comes to mind is that old video short "Design for Dreaming" complete with the "Kitchen of Tomorrow".
"good artificial turkey for the vegetarians"
Good heavens, do you really think most vegetarians WANT artificial turkey? Maybe those who changed during their life "miss" meat, but those of us who have NEVER eaten it (not for the past 150 years in my case as a 4th generation vegetarian) it's not something we would ever contemplate.
The WORST sort of vegetarian food is that which is made to look, feel and taste like meat. Unfortunately, that seems to be what most people think of when they try to prepare vegetarian fare.
Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents.
Whatever. This christmas eve was like many a christmas eve before it at my home: lots of people (14) - some I see only on christmas eve, others I see every day, others I hadn't met before; lots of different food (candided beets, herring salad, baked fish, poppyseed cake, etc); a christmas tree; christmas carols.
It lasted about seven hours, from 6pm to 1am, like it usually does. Sure, we had presents, but they sure as hell weren't the centerpiece. Sure, when I was a kid it was mostly about the loot, now it's totally about the love. It's about having a couple of days when nobody needs to make an excuse to get away from everyday chores, and spend time with they people who they want to.
So lay off the bullshit, for a lot of us christmas is much more than presents.
This futuroligist is nothing but yet another paid professional bullshitter. Given the way Xmas has evolved throughout christianities history and the way it's changing just now, Xmas most certainly won't be celebrated the way we do it today.
It could also very well be that the larger part of animals with a spinal column have died out due to strange diseases and/or enviromental causes and that most people won't even consider eating meat anymore. Adding stuff about mindreaders and other crap doesn't make this statement any more interessting. How do these people make a living, I wonder?
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
the flying cars we won't have -- Again.
They've 'predicted' that one so many times that they've finally figured out that we're "lost pidgeons" on that topic.
They're still predicting that machines will read our minds and do everything we want for us before we even know we want it though. Kinda makes me wonder just what it is *we* are expected to be doing.
I guess the future is scarier than we thought. A life of maintaining the machines that maintain us, until the machines take that function over too.
Good thing I'll believe this is even possible when the the machines give me monkeys flying out of my butt for Christmas.
Or a flying Alfa Romeo.
KFG
Establishing a lunar colony and going to Mars were all possible, but went unfunded.
IMHO, NASA should have handed things over to the private sector after 1972. But of course, no bureaucracy is going to let itself be destroyed that easily.
SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
All men won't have beards and all women won't be wearing burkas.
Cake or Death? Cake Please!
When trying to predict the future, one must always look at the past. What have we seen in the past? Well, usually what happens is something so groundbreaking, so radical is invinted that it changes and shapes the whole course of civilziation in ways no one could have expected, making the current way of life and even forms of government inadequet. Cannons/Gunpowder in the feudal age was such an invention, basically defeating the enitre purpose of castles. The automobile was another... what part of your daily life is NOT touched in some way by the invention of the automobile? In the future, instantaneous matter transportation (beam me up, Scotty!) could be such an invention. Think of how quickly the world would have to change if anyone could travel anywhere instantly. Think of the implications it would have for crime if there was no way to prevent people from "beaming" into certain locations. Also, this is something that we a currently able to imagine. The really future-changing inventions will be extensions of future inventions, thusly being almost impossible for us to concieve right now.
I have a lot of hope for humanity. I think that in a few million years we could have a maverlous, galactic civilazation, numbering in the trillions. The quality of life would be so vastly improved by the technolgy and the abudant resouces available in the galaxy in the form of solar power and raw elements, especially compared to what we have here on this little blue dot called home. Sometimes, I think I was accidentally born a few hundered thousand years too soon. ;)
"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking
It'll be the 13th century anyway.
Cake or Death? Cake Please!
Must be nice to have the time and money to worry about how your meat is raised. I'm just happy to be able to afford to buy meat. I have a lot of customers who are vegan or vegetarian, or who want to meet the meat before they eat it (what's his name? how big was his pen? what did he eat? Did he heat only organcally grown corn? Can I see where the corn was grown?). Without fail, those people are wealthy, in that they have plenty of money and time to waste worrying about shit like this. While I envy their resources, I can definitely say that if I had time and money enough like they do, I wouldn't waste it worrying about every little fucking molecule that enters my body. They're all fucking neurotic. If you ask me, life is too short to be neurotic. Eat & be happy.
I eat whatever I want and I'm healthy as an ox. In my opinion A. It's mental. If you spend all of your time worrying about what you eat and being healthy, then you WILL be sick (and neurotic) B. It's exercise. I work all day, every day. I could eat nothing but fatback all day and not gain a pound. Actually, since I've started working all day every day, I now eat one large cheese pizza a day, Wendy's a few times, and other random food that comes by. I've also lost 5 pounds.
Did it ever occur to the author of this story that, quite possibly, vegetarians would not want to eat an artificial turkey?
Most vegetarians, in my experience, have more than one reason for making their choice. Sure, there's the obvious, that "animal life is sacred" and that animals should not be killed under any condition. But what about health? Obviously, synthetic turkey would be just as unhealthy and cholesterol-packed as real turkey. (You could bioengineer a cholesterol-free turkey, but I'm not sure if it could still be properly called turkey.)
What about the organic principle? You often find many 'vegetarians' who stay away from red meat for health reasons, but would sooner eat hunted poultry or fished salmon than bioengineered tomatoes; they realize that for humans to live, we must by necessity kill other lifeforms (whether animal or plant), but that we should not interfere with nature until the end.
What about taste? Some vegetarians, believe it or not, just don't like the taste of red meat, poultry, or even fish, because they were brought up not to eat those products and never developed the taste.
There are a certain number of people who would be overjoyed by the development of a bioengineered turkey. However, I believe that those people would mostly be lifelong omnivores living in the suburbs, who have pangs of conscience every time they take their children to tour the local farms. This turkey would make it possible for them to pretend they were actually making a moral judgment. Vegeterians, meanwhile, won't care.
An android Jenna Jameson wet nurse will tickle your senile old chin and giggle suggestively as it changes your diapers and wipes the drool from your face, and you'll feel oh-so-ripped off that you aren't young enough to enjoy the advantages of the future.
There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
The most significant part of a turkey's existence is when a human being consumes it.
If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
A. I am not doing it to lose weight, that's a stupid notion. If you eat right your weight will be stable and will be your actual expected weight.
B. If in the beginning I had to think about what I was going to eat after a year you stop thinking about it, it is just your normal life. Why do I have to think about anything if I buy only stuff I eat and do not even consider other products in stores as food?
C. Excercise will keep your muscles toned, sure, but it will not do anything at all to protect you from all the crap that you intake. That's all I am saying, did I say anything about not excercising?
D. There are many peope who are neurotic and they are not vegetarians. Some people become neurotic from overexcercising for example; ever heard of guys going nuts about not been big enough and pumping metall 12 hours a day every day? - that's neurotic and not healthy.
Cheers
You can't handle the truth.
Basically, if it requires miniaturization (like 300M transistors on a chip, before the 60s, transistors were made one at a time), low weight and high strength, you can trace the origins of whatever the product is to the space program.
Find a copy of Robert Heinlein's Expanded Universe, there's a short article that'll give you the highlights. Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability is a reprint of that Science article discussing the future alternative energy sources civilization will need when the oil runs out.
Powersats are on the list. As I see it, we are basically a few years of R&D away from being able to build the kind of space infrastructure that will be required to make building them relatively easy. It's basically a matter of government and major corporations being willing to put major money for a project with 10-15 years before a major return on investment. It's not a matter of discovering new laws of nature, it's a problem that can be solved by throwing money at it.
Remember that sooner or later, the Third World is going to become industrialized and will have per capita resource requirements comparable to the US and EU. What's left of the world's oil just won't do it.
With respect to all of us (Americans, I guess) having maids again, either the resource problems of this planet will be solved in such a way that you won't be able to get cheap domestic help from south of the border, or you won't be able to afford it anyway because your tax money at tax rates you don't want to imagine will be going into military expenditures designed to make sure that the US and allied countries have control over what's left of the world's resources.
Tech Public Policy stuff
We already have visitors from Christmas of the future here to taunt us with gifts from the future.
Ian
Offer lots of vegitable and salad, thay don't like it, they don't have to come back next year.
If they want to be vegans, fine, but there is no use forcing other people for there decsision.
Remeber Vegans are OK, disrespectfull vegans can suck ass.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
In the future we will be able to eat all the Soylent green we want, on tuesdays.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
the US population is not on the rise.
Matter of fact, most 'first world' countries have a population that is stable(as far as numbers) , or is diminishing.
You do have a point thought, what happens when a fast food resturant can replace the cooking staff with a 500,000 dollar auromation unit? Every cook in the fast food industry will not have work with 5 years.
Si the company that makes them may need to hir 2000 people, but there are a hell of a lot more fastfood prepareers then that.
Society needs to start thinking about a way to support itself in an enviroment where fewer and fewer people actually need to be working in order to keep things running. If you don't give the people ane avenue to take so they can support themselves, or you do not take care of your people, they will rebel.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
The easy solution, of course, was to just eat the vegans.
;-)
Save a vegetable, eat a vegetarian.
Yeah, we thought about that, but the University probably wouldn't have liked us doing it...
Alvin's predictions have always been either uninteresting or ludicrous, imho. However, this point is *so* fantastic.
Sure, in 47 years we might have nanotech that can create turkeys. But we might also have nanotech that has turned every human into a turkey. Christmas day will be the least interesting distinction between now and 2050. Ok, now I'll go read the article.
There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
Acme Foil Hat, LLC
Were I to bet on it, I'd say the walking/talking Barbie WILL exist by 2050
I'm surprised it doesn't already. The technology is pretty much there.
--
"This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
BULLSHIT! I was suppose to have a flying car back in the 80's according to "experts" in the '50s.
:)
It's called a helicopter.
--
"This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."