Slashdot Mirror


Japan Developing Diamond-based Semiconductors

s spencer and others wrote in with submissions about Japan funding the development of diamond-based semiconductors to replace silicon chips. The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

225 comments

  1. 3rd Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3rd Post

  2. pentium iii by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    pentium iii=mitsubishi?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:pentium iii by checkitout · · Score: 3, Informative

      pentium iii=mitsubishi?

      For those who don't get it... mitsubishi means three diamonds in japanese.

  3. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for playing

  4. engagement present... by jkcity · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard in asia that people give mobile phones with diamonds in them as engagement rpesents, so maybe they are taking a stab at the engagement market :)>

  5. the guys and gals at intel are about to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are turning japanese, we are turning japanese yes i really think so!

    1. Re:the guys and gals at intel are about to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      we are turning japanese, we are turning japanese yes i really think so!

      No sex, no drugs, no women, no you, no wonder it's dark.
      Everyone around me is a total stranger,
      Everyone around me is a psyched lone ranger,
      Everyone!

      I still have this on a 45 RPM!

      But seriously... Diamonds/Gems have been the technology behind fantastic electronics and devostating weapons systems in movies for years, it's about time reality caught up!

  6. Computer Reclycing by theBunkinator · · Score: 2

    Computer recycling may have a chance after all ... how many circuits do you have to kill for an engagement ring?

    1. Re:Computer Reclycing by airiano · · Score: 1

      Nothing says I love you like diamond based electronics.


  7. First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First post!

    1. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you wish. got you beat. my first "first post." i feel so proud. i can check it off now from my "things i must do before i die" list.

  8. right then.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm off to Tiffanys before they run out of these toys!

  9. Hmm... by Rayonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Pentiums are a girl's best friend"?

    Okay, that's not funny. Taking off Score +1 Bonus.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CPU's will be measured in terms of carats instead of hertz.

  10. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Diamond based semiconductors? Joy, we're returning to the days of the overly expensive CPU...

  11. Diamonds... hmmm... by Mr+Teddy+Bear · · Score: 1

    Trying to appeal to the female side of the species I see. Diamonds, afterall, are a girl's best friend. :-) How long before they start making chips out of dogs?
    hehehehe

  12. The girlfriend should be happy about this... by PhotonSphere · · Score: 5, Funny


    She's been pushing for a diamond for a little while now - I wonder if she'll be upset if she gets it in chip form rather than the traditional ring?

    1. Re:The girlfriend should be happy about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I guess you could say... diamonds are a geek's best friend
      </yafcdo+1>

      /. jokes could be automated, I swear. +4? holy cow. Looks like the moderation is automated to.

    2. Re:The girlfriend should be happy about this... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If you put it in the ring and packaged it correctly, maybe you could use it to hold some data or open a sekrit door (ala an iButton on a signet ring mount.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The girlfriend should be happy about this... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      No, I believe the wedding ring is the one that closes various entrances, er... doors.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  13. Breakthrough by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a breakthrough in wearable computers!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  14. Heh by ramirez · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would say "yes," but why does the ring say "Intel Inside?"

  15. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diamonds are pretty much worthless rocks, they only sell for high prices due to vile cartels such as DeBeers, controlling the market and using tradition and advertising to sell them as rare and expensive gems.

  16. if this comes through by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    Moore's Law's funeral will have to be postponed for a little while longer yet again.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:if this comes through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. IN TWENTY YEARS when the tech is viable.
      See the article for details.

    2. Re:if this comes through by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

      Well, you never know when a breakthrough will come in laying down carbon atoms.

      Remember, all we need here is a flat surface not a gemstone.

      --
      It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    3. Re:if this comes through by theCat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hmmmm...maybe. We still don't know what the raw performance of these dia-chips will be. No doubt you are thinking "oh, 1000 degC, that is great for overclocking." But do you really want the equivalent of a blast furnace on your desktop? And, what kind of logic board and surface traces will be able to manage that kind of heat? The answer is, none at all.

      These are very special duty devices. They will end up in the exhaust manifold of your car, not the logic board of your PC. They will be built and deployed to resist failure under heat, and might not run even as fast as what you can buy today; clock speed will probably not even make it into the requirements document.

      So this is no answer to Moore's Law, more like Murphy's Law; trying to get something that is far less likely to go wrong in places where traditional chips go wrong all the time. Thus we can extend the technology we know well (digital computing) into new places (harsh environments.) It will be interesting to see what they do with that...launch a compact space probe into the corona of the sun? Drop one into an erupting volcano to float around and send data? Lots of stuff comes to mind.

      But not overclocking.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    4. Re:if this comes through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, at 1000 C radiative cooling is already pretty efficient, no need to use fans and cooling devices. OK, you might need a some radiation shields for the rest of the machine or some more temperature resistant PCB.

    5. Re:if this comes through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diamond is the BEST heat conductor on record...

  17. Disadvantages by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The main disadvantages include the fact that diamonds are terribly expensive :)

    1. Re:Disadvantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I saw a show on PBS about diamonds one time. It turns out that they are relatively inexpensive, but the major diamond producers will deliberately limit quantity produced to keep the price up. Also, what kind of diamonds are they using. Industrial diamonds are relatively cheep, as any one who has a nice set of diamond files will tell you.

    2. Re:Disadvantages by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually diamonds are neither rare nor intrinsically valuable. The only reason that they cost so much at the jewelry store is because of the monopoly of debeers. They pretty much control all the diamonds in the world. if they wanted they could manufacture diamonds out of coal instead of mining them. It is not a lack of supply that makes them expensive but the fact that one company controls all the supply.

      Diamonds are expensive for the same reason that Win2k costs $200 per seat. Actually, I prefer emeralds myself.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    3. Re:Disadvantages by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      if they wanted they could manufacture diamonds out of coal instead of mining them

      Not just yet. Other companies have manufactured diamonds, but they get cloudy after a few years. When this gets solved, you'll hear about it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Diamonds are expensive for the same reason that Win2k costs $200 per seat

      Uh, no. Artificial diamonds look wrong. And natural diamonds cannot be compared with a human product like Win2K.

    5. Re:Disadvantages by esonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      These chips will not be based on cut diamond wafers in the way today chips are based on cut silicon wafers because it's pretty much impossible to cut diamond. Rather they would be based on evaporated diamond films (like the SOI - Silicon On Insulator - technique).
      The fact that diamond is more suitable at higher temperatures is due to it's large band-gap: 5.5 eV (Si has 1.1 eV). So even at high temperature diamond is an (very good) isolator (very pure Si is also an good isolator at room temperature but it gets a lot more conductive at higher temperatures due to its small band gap). This large band-gap is also the reason why diamond would be a candidate for UV LEDs or lasers (UV starts at about 3eV). OTOH, Silicon with 1.1eV is in the infrared. BTW, the 235nm radiation they mention in the article corresponds to ~5.2 eV.

    6. Re:Disadvantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      natural diamonds cannot be compared with a human product like Win2K.

      yeah artificial diamonds actually do what they are supposed to do. namely nothing but be expensive pretty stones.(personally i think quartz is prettier and actually has a really cool function (piezo electric needles for records))

    7. Re:Disadvantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dummy, the reason why he is saying that diamonds are expensive is because they are being sold by a price fixing monopoly and they can get away with it. But products, in there native state (unfinished for diamonds, bits on media for windows), are essentially worthless.

    8. Re:Disadvantages by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
      Uh, no. Artificial diamonds look wrong.

      De Beers is planning to (or may already) etch a tiny hallmark on their diamonds because some artificial ones are now indistinguishable. (Saw this on a documentary a few months ago, so I think trustworthy.) Anyway, to a layman zircon is indistinguishable, so "look wrong" is somewhat an exaggeration, or falling for De Beers' mystique.

    9. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Dummy, the reason why he is saying that diamonds are expensive is because they are being sold by a price fixing monopoly and they can get away with it. But products, in there native state (unfinished for diamonds, bits on media for windows), are essentially worthless.

      His argument was that the ONLY reason that the price is high is because of the monopoly, and made a comparison to Windows 2000. This would only be a valid analogy if gemstone-quality cut diamonds could be created ex nihilo and replicated at zero cost, which Windows 2000 can be. But gemstone-quality cut diamonds cannot be created ex nihilo, they can only be created by cutting natural diamonds via a laborious process that is different for each natural diamond [i.e., you cannot just run a loop of disk copies to make millions of identical gemstone-quality cut diamonds like you can to create millions of identical desktop-quality {RIGHT ....} Win2K CDs]. And if natural diamonds are so bloody common - why does De Beers have a monopoly on them? If they were so common, they could be dug out of the ground almost anywhere; and yet De Beers doesn't have a monopoly on real estate.

      In other words, the form of monopoly here is hydraulic despotism: De Beers has complete control over a limited resource. The form of monopoly MS has is quite different. Therefore, the poster's argument proceeds via false analogy, and is impeached thereby. Quod erat demonstrandum.

      Dummy my ass.

    10. Re:Disadvantages by gmahan · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Until the late nineteenth century, diamonds were found only in a few riverbeds in India and in the jungles of Brazil, and the entire world production of gem diamonds amounted to a few pounds a year. In 1870, however, huge diamond mines were discovered near the Orange River, in South Africa, where diamonds were soon being scooped out by the ton. Suddenly, the market was deluged with diamonds. The British financiers who had organized the South African mines quickly realized that their investment was endangered; diamonds had little intrinsic value -- and their price depended almost entirely on their scarcity. The financiers feared that when new mines were developed in South Africa, diamonds would become at best only semiprecious gems."

      Full article at The Atlantic

      Diamonds are no longer rare, and are only worth anything for the same reason cabbage patch dolls once were: artificial scarcity.

    11. Re:Disadvantages by MojoRilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Artificial diamonds most certaintly do not "look wrong".

      According to the NOVA program "Diamond Deception" originally broadcast on 2/01/2000, "These synthetic diamonds are such good copies of the real thing that they not only have the identical atomic structure but can even replicate their flaws."

    12. Re:Disadvantages by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Actually diamonds are neither rare nor intrinsically valuable

      well only partially true, Industriral dimonds are produced by the tons, gem quality diamons are 'rarer'. By rarer i mean that the diamond cartels control supply as to keep prices high. However gem quality stores are still less abundant than lower grades of diamonds. (this is all laid out on that show about diamonds on the discovery channel).

      Now on the other side, just like in semiconductor production purity, or should I say controlled imputiry is the key. Diamonds are tradionally considered electical insulators, but as technology has marched on more things are semiconductors than were ever initally thought (ceramics and such). Controlling the doping agent in the semiconductor becomes the hard part. I cannot say if they are going to 'purify' high grade industiral diamonds or make these things out of an artificial process. As i understand a breakthru has recently been made in diamond manufacture. Which is about all i know about it.

      Diamonds are actually a reasonably good conductor of heat, this may also make it a good canidate for semiconductor use. (speculaton from here on) The electrons in the diamond crystal structure is very tight (which is why its vary hard), with the proper doping this could even yield superconducting semiconductors ;)

    13. Re:Disadvantages by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Keep in mind that this article was written in 1982. It talks about prices dropping from $60,000 per carat to $30,000 a carat. The colapse it predicts happened in the early '90s, and prices of "perfect" diamonds are now quoted around $5,000 per carat, and can be had for slightly over $1,500 per carat without much trouble. The article also talks about resale values of diamonds being 40% of their retail value. Today, diamonds 1 carat and smaller are essentially worthless. Large retail jewlery chains are still maintaining a significant markup, but that is steadily decreasing now that the public has greater access to wholesale diamonds.

      If she has to have a diamond (even after reading that article), do a little research and buy a loose stone from a wholesale vendor. It's not hard to find one, and you can get a local jewler to make you a very nice setting for $100-300. For two months salary these days, she can have a ring that will give her a workout. When I purchased my fiancee's ring (a 2.72 carat saphire with two .25 carat diamonds in a custom setting she designed. $900) I saw another guy buy a 2.9 carat diamond engagement ring for $3500. It wasn't flawless, but it was an excelent stone, and impractically large.

    14. Re:Disadvantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      De Beers had indeed cornered the market. But it was in silver, not in diamonds. Unfortunately for them, they didn't play their cards too well and wound up broke.

    15. Re:Disadvantages by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster:
      And if natural diamonds are so bloody common - why does De Beers have a monopoly on them? If they were so common, they could be dug out of the ground almost anywhere; and yet De Beers doesn't have a monopoly on real estate.

      Well, gemstone-quality diamonds ARE quite rare ... but diamonds are not. There are known diamond mines in (non-exhaustive list follows) the Republic of South Africa, Russia, Australia, Canada, Angola, Namibia, Sierra Leone, Syria and even Arkansas (although the mine never produced enough diamonds to be commercially viable, it's quite a popular tourist attraction). Although natural diamonds are not common, they are NOT exceptionally rare. High-quality emeralds are MUCH rarer than D-grade (investment quality (colorless, flawless under 10x magnification)) diamonds and MUCH more expensive.

      The monopoly problem arises when you consider that DeBeers has a monopoly on diamond mining in the RSA, which unquestionably boasts the richest KNOWN Kimberlite pipes on earth. None of the other producers can afford to piss off DeBeers because, just like the Saudis control oil prices, nobody can undercut them for very long if they want to stay in business. DeBeers has the production capacity in place and amortized/depreciated such that they can COLLAPSE world diamond prices and keep them that way long enough to bankrupt all the other producers combined. The smaller producers go along with DeBeers prices because they HAVE to to stay alive.

      In response to this portion of the parent post:
      ... products, in there native state (unfinished for diamonds, ... ), are essentially worthless.

      Nice try, but WELL off the mark. The VAST majority of diamonds mined in the world are sold for industrial use as abrasives. These diamonds are merely crushed and size-graded, and they make up the bulk of the revenue stream from a diamond mine. Gemstone-grade diamonds are such a miniscule fraction of total production that the gem-grade stones could also be crushed and the mines would still be profitable. The extra profit from supplying the jewelry trade is pure gravy.
    16. Re:Disadvantages by 403Forbidden · · Score: 2

      Wrong, wrong, wrong.

      Diamonds have been perfectly maufactured, but Debeers somehow can control the amount that are made per year to create artificial demand. Also Debeers puts IDs on the diamonds to make them "authentic."

      Even if manufacture isn't perfect, this isn't for looks, it's for electrical use.

    17. Re:Disadvantages by A+Bugg · · Score: 1

      i think maybe what the previous poster meant was that they were essentially worthless in resale value and not worthless to the mining companies, and the truth be told they are pretty worthless when considering resale value. .
      a bugg

    18. Re:Disadvantages by Ninja+Master+Gara · · Score: 1
      Not so long ago, I remember seeing a special about diamond production on Discovery. Several companies now make perfect gem quality diamonds. The gem is indistiguishable from a cultured diamond except through some VERY specialized tests, many of which involve destroying the diamond. Most of these companies advertise their products as artificial, and indeed consider it a selling point. Some claim their diamonds are completely indisitinguishable, even under these tests.

      A russian company is referenced often in relation to high quality synthetic diamonds.

      Some references:

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/2703diamo nd.html
      http://sdiamond.50megs.com/
      http://www.lucentdiamonds.com/article_list.htm

      --

      ---
      When I grow up, I want to be a kid again.
    19. Re:Disadvantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Debeers CAN'T manufacture them. There have been several efforts to date to create a jewel quality synthetic diamond, but the results so far have been less than ideal. The results of some of the work by some of the Russians at work on this have produced yellow diamonds - but they still haven't worked out how to prevent the nitrogen contamination that causes the yellowing.

    20. Re:Disadvantages by gmahan · · Score: 1

      Yup..diamonds are indeed a lot cheaper these days, and the smart buyer can even negotiate a bit with some jewlers.

      I got my wife a 1.2 carat diamond in a platinum setting. It wasn't flawless, but it was something like a $7000 diamond in 1982 dollars. I got it, and the setting, for under $2000.

    21. Re:Disadvantages by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Ninewands - thanks for the correction re: gemstone-quality diamonds, which were the only diamonds I was considering in my postings.
      The rest of your posting is an excellent example of how properly to argue with someone you disagree with, and maintain the respect of your interlocutor.

    22. Re:Disadvantages by thorilan · · Score: 1

      well you are mostly correct but one fact that most people miss is that there is roughly about 200000 times more diamonds in the world than the ones we see in the jewelry store. we use them in all kinds of things. the reason most diamonds arnt valuable is because they are perfect and wont reflect light because the light passes right through them like normal glass and they arnt good for jewelry. as for jewelry we pay a 1000% -3000% mark up . that is why jewelry stores only have to sell a few peices to stay in business each month. as for the original intent of the article of ceramics and alternate materials , i think its not a bad idea to try. i work in japan for one of the largest companies that does hybrid ceramic material research btw. personaly i think ceramics are old and holding back he technilogical leaps that sci fi movies aspire to , and that we need to put more into research and design of new materials that can meet the needs of today

  18. higher electrical resistance? by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't that a bad thing? It would increase power requirements, create heat, etc. Even if a diamond chip could stand that, not everything else in the box can - not to mention being a problem for laptop batteries.

    1. Re:higher electrical resistance? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      What's really cool is that diamond is flammable =)

    2. Re:higher electrical resistance? by crgrace · · Score: 2, Informative

      They mean it can withstand higher voltages, not that it has higher electrical resistance. Silicon is an excellent insulator (extremely high electrical resistance) unless impurities (dopants) are added. That is key to the operation of a MOSFET.

    3. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Khomar · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a bad thing? It would increase power requirements, create heat, etc. Even if a diamond chip could stand that, not everything else in the box can - not to mention being a problem for laptop batteries.

      As stated in the article:

      This property means that diamond chips can... be placed in a high-temperature environment, such as a vehicle's engine.

      As I understand this, the chips allow computer components to be placed in areas that were prohibitive with silicon due to cooling requirements. High-end mainframes could also be designed differently around the new capabilities.

      Someday I will think up a good sig.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon is an excellent insulator (extremely high electrical resistance) unless impurities (dopants) are added. That is key to the operation of a MOSFET.

      Actually, that's the key to basically every semiconductor made. MOSFETs are just one of many devices out there.

    5. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      I have found that with enough oxygen and heat most things are flammable. >:)

    6. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that a bad thing? It would increase power requirements, create heat, etc. Even if a diamond chip could stand that, not everything else in the box can - not to mention being a problem for laptop batteries.


      Remember: P = I^2 * R

      So given a constant voltage (which is a quasi-reasonable assumption; it assumes that the juntion voltage of any carbon-based junction was close to .67 volts [that of Si]) you would have:

      P = I^2 * R = E^2 / R ; R increasing ; E constant,
      therefore P decreasing, less heat etc etc.

      Remember, higher resistance means less current!

      -AC
    7. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better use standard notation:
      ohmic power loss at resistor is
      P = U^2/R

      U = voltage
      that also explains why increasing the core voltage of your Athlon/Pentium increases the heat generation.

    8. Re:higher electrical resistance? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Silicon dioxide is not flammable.

    9. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the key to MOSFETs (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor FET) was the high resistivity of the Oxide...

    10. Re:higher electrical resistance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post was miswritten. Diamond has the highest known thermal CONDUCTIVITY (not resistance) of any material (from 800 to 3,500 W/m-degK, depending on quality and isotopic purity - copper is 400 on this scale).

      Diamond chips wouldn't run hotter. They would run cooler because their higher heat conductivity would facilitate heat transport from the heat generation region to the air or water heat exchanger. Diamond heat spreaders (no active devices, just a slab of diamond) are used to reduce junction temperatures in many high power laser diodes and are under test for use in microprocessor packages. Remember, you don't have to use a lot of power to have a heat problem. You just have to have high power density. Think about a flashlight bulb - uses under a watt, but produces about 1400 degrees C filament temperature. Microprocessors have hot spots too, and diamond heat spreaders can reduce those, allowing increased clock rates - up to 65% speed increase in some cases.

      Besides heat transport, other good things about diamond for device use are its very high breakdown field, high saturated field carrier velocity, and excellent radiation resistance.

      The article isn't talking about using mined diamonds. It's routine to make diamond films using chemical vapor deposition, and dopants can be incorporated during growth to alter electrical properties. It's easy to get p-type diamond using boron dopants. The hassle is getting a practical n-type dopant. There's also no nice native oxide to facilitate processing. Commercial diamond devices are at least 10-15 years off, IMHO. Do a Google on CVD diamond and you'll find all sorts of links.

    11. Re:higher electrical resistance? by w42w42 · · Score: 1

      Mod this one up. Nice explanation, thanks.

  19. The other advantage of diamonds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're pretty.

  20. so i'll be buying my next cpu from... by ltwally · · Score: 1

    ...the jewelry store?

    please tell me we're going to start seeing OEM Jewelers popping up now... retail prices are murder!

    --



    /dev/random
  21. What about the draining of the semiconductors by lordShiva · · Score: 1

    I thought that we had reached the limitations of linear computing.... such as the height of moore's law..

    --
    _-^ D3\/1|_ ^-_ in me
  22. quick thoughts by greechneb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad they waited until after I bought an engagement ring...

    Intel may now become the United States largest diamond importer.

    Just as long as the jewelry store doesn't put up a sign saying "Intel Insides Inside"

    1. Re:quick thoughts by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I'm glad they waited until after I bought an engagement ring...

      What? You didn't know all women are already networked in a huge, anti-guy conspiracy? Well, that certainly takes the ca
      [NO CARRIER]

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:quick thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I have no sense of humor...
      The "Diamonds" are actually large, synthetically grown, single-crystal boules of carbon. Intel won't be interested in your diamond ring.

      This is in no way +5 funny. Are you people retarded?

  23. US billed for vapourious eyecon FraUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's right. just when you thought yOUR billyuns were safe from anybody but fudders (& their payper liesense stock markup fraud, hostage ransom scam "pards") getting them, this happens.

    i hope they're not getting their diamonds buy causing babIEs to be dipped in diamond mines.

  24. And you thought Intel was expensive before by pr0c · · Score: 1

    Just when you think nothing can be more expensive than a Pentium processor (as compared to athlons) they invent a way.

    And what the @#^%#? I go to check prices and a Athlon XP 2700 333 costs almost as much as a P4 2.8 ghz.

    What you don't want to buy a diamond Pentium 5? Too bad thats all that Dell and Gateway sells and you must buy a diamond cd of WindowsXP SE, all for the remarkable low price of 6,000 dollars.

  25. It's time to end the diamond monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are people dying for these, while a tiny group of people has rooms and rooms full of them. If the real supply of diamonds were ever actually released (or hey, there was real competition), the price would plummet.

  26. There are not enough diamonds in the world... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

    There's no way enough diamonds in the world to do this....

    Women will be pissed....LOL

    1. Re:There are not enough diamonds in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because the she will have to pick up the check on the engagement dinner.

    2. Re:There are not enough diamonds in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do some research, jeesh, diamond thin films have been announced for a little while now. Diamonds come from carbon. Show me how there is a shortage of carbon to make artificial diamond.

  27. expensive by ScubaS · · Score: 1

    There are ways to synthetically create diamonds; which are worth nothing in the jewelry market. but then again what geek wouldnt buy a 14k diamond for his love?

    1. Re:expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...what geek wouldnt buy a 14k diamond for his love?

      14k or 14GHz?

  28. Diamond Chips = Thermal death by johngaunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I recall, one of the ways to utterly destroy a diamond is to run an excess amount of current through it. So, if you try to overclock your diamond chip, could you vaporize it? What about current overloads caused by over heating or bad power supply? Could be interesting.

    --
    In the wild there are no dumb lions tigers or bears. Only humanity subsidizes the continued existence of the stupid.
    1. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      And what is that magic smoke that escapes from my hard drives when I touch the molex connector up backwards? Or any time I smell that sickingly sweet smell.

      The same problems with over heating and bad power supplies also applies to silicon. I would suspect that diamond is actually a little more tollerant. I have no idea.

    2. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by jc42 · · Score: 2

      So, if you try to overclock your diamond chip, could you vaporize it?

      Nah; most of it would just reconfigure as graphite, except at the surface.

      There is a problem with overly-warm diamonds in an oxygen atmosphere: Occasionally, a C atom will join up with a passing O2 molecule and they'll wander off together. This doesn't happen with diamond rings, because the temperature required would be high enough that you'd pull the ring off. But it is a worry in a chip that you want to last for years. But it's easy enough to prevent. You just cover exposed diamond surfaces with a layer of something that blocks the oxygen. Gold will do quite nicely.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it is, it's written in the article. also diamond has the highest melting point of all elements: 3500 C which means that the diamond chip will be the last thing evaporating from the whole computer.

    4. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by darkonc · · Score: 1
      You just cover exposed diamond surfaces with a layer of something that blocks the oxygen. Gold will do quite nicely.

      Oh, yeah, real nice... It'd prevent oxidation, but a gold layer on the chip would pretty much destroy it's electrical properties... Gold would also melt long before the chip did. Probably just enclosing the chip in a nitrogen filled cap would do the job well enough.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    5. Re:Diamond Chips = Thermal death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's not like your chip is going to be unpackaged and exposed to air. What's normally used these days? Plastic? Glass? Ceramic?

  29. Other Advantages by Bobman1235 · · Score: 1
    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.


    And of course the relative abundance of it and extreme low cost.

    Practicality anyone?

    1. Re:Other Advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relative abundance and extreme low cost of silicon is the only thing keeping it so widespread. But obviously computer manufacturers are running out of performance increases they can squeeze out of silicon.

      If there were something as abundant and cheap as silicon, manufacturers would've started using it a long time ago.

    2. Re:Other Advantages by Squarewav · · Score: 2

      actualy diamonds are abundant, its just that the ones good enough to make a ring out of are very rare , the majority of diamonds they pull out of the ground are ether too yellow or are not shaped properly making them useless for anything other then sand paper

  30. damn debeers by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

    this will be a better plan if someone can bust the debeers monopoly, and make diamonds a semi-precious stone.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:damn debeers by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      A quick look at the industry says that manufactured diamonds are within probably a decade or two of being honestly competative, and then another decade or two after that for them to be "accepted", or thought of by the masses as not being 'less than' natural diamonds.

      If this takes off, it will likely help manufactured diamonds' cause, as their demand will be significantly higher (and manufactured diamonds' main problem, color, is irrelevant when being used for industry and not jewlery)

    2. Re:damn debeers by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I'd like to know when Fabrage will introduce the Egg based server.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:damn debeers by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Yeah. That is correct. But diamonds would be "cheap" tomorrow if DeBeers didn't hold its monopoly.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:damn debeers by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster:
      A quick look at the industry says that manufactured diamonds are within probably a decade or two of being honestly competative, and then another decade or two after that for them to be "accepted"

      Depends on the market you are looking at. Synthetic diamond is the "Gold Standard" for many industrial applications and has been for the last 12-15 years. This is because synthetic diamonds, which are manufactured under highly controlled conditions have much more predictable properties than natural stones and they can be made in forms (e.g. polycrystalline "sheets" for facing cutters on rock bits) that just aren't available in natural diamond.
  31. Resistance by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    Resistance is ... useful?

    I can barely imagine the ThermalTake Volcanoes for these things...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heat tolerance is important as the power dissipated is impressive with today's chips. Due to diamond's rather large bandgap, heat tolerance is a better than Si. Resistance is also useful. I'd imagine creating a MOSFET with a leaky gate is problematic. Part of the reason that BJTs dominated in the early days of the semiconductor industry is the lack of a suitable substance as an insulator between the gate and the channel. I'm thinking the researchers are referring to diamond's natural ability in undoped form to resist current flow, so that's one less obstacle to overcome.

  32. So, no more ZIF sockets? by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    If the CPU is a diamond, I can just jam it in there with all the force I want!

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
    1. Re:So, no more ZIF sockets? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      If the CPU is a diamond, I can just jam it in there with all the force I want!

      Shows what you know about jewelry... you have to mount a diamond.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  33. Diamond? Man's Best Friend? by lordShiva · · Score: 1

    WIll women have to buy a man a diamond now... look honey slip on this motherboard, awww it fit's perfect, *on knees* will you marry me?

    --
    _-^ D3\/1|_ ^-_ in me
  34. "up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Diamond chips can work at a temperature of up to 1,000 degrees Celsius, while silicon chips stop working above 150 degrees Celsius"

    Imagine the overclocking!

    1. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      Nevermind the overclocking, imagine the silence...no more fans, and as an added bonus, you get a stovetop cooker with every purchase :-)

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    2. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by JVert · · Score: 1

      Anyone a little concerned about "The China Syndrome"?

    3. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      What do you case it in?
      What kind of wires do you attach?

    4. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no more need to install glow lights - just expose the die :-)

    5. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tungsten or Tantalum, for example. There are enough metals with high melting point.

    6. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      I already overclocked one. You can see the firewire running through the backplane.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    7. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Yeah.
      But what will Intel do when we start using Carats instead of Megaherts to measure speed? =-)

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    8. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I didn't really want my PC running at 150C, so why r they offering to make it run at 1000C?

    9. Re:"up to 1,000 degrees Celsius" by lvdrproject · · Score: 1
      ... I don't know, what will they do?

      Not that that's going to happen anyway.

  35. Heat resitstance? by Yokaze · · Score: 2

    Tell me, when we reach temperatures that will make Si melt :)

    I thought the main advantage of diamond over Si is a better heat conductance.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    1. Re:Heat resitstance? by crgrace · · Score: 1

      You are correct, the artical wasn't very clear from a technical standpoint. C has better heat conductance so it can "resist" high temperatures and voltages more easily than silicon. They didn't mean resistance in an electrical context.

    2. Re:Heat resitstance? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I thought the main advantage of diamond over Si is a better heat conductance

      What are you talking about? Diamonds resist all at +19%!

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    3. Re:Heat resitstance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Si melting point: ~1400 C
      C melting point: ~3500 C
      according to webelements

  36. this is fantastic! by TechnoVooDooDaddy · · Score: 2

    Now the diamond conglomerates will face extreme pressure to quit artificially inflating and regulating the cost of diamonds..

    1. Re:this is fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You mean PRICE, not COST. There is a difference, even though most prople use them in the same sense. Cost is the cost or production and price is the price of sale. Generally, the difference is the profit a firm makes.

    2. Re:this is fantastic! by Surreal_Streaker · · Score: 1
      Now the diamond conglomerates will face extreme pressure to quit artificially inflating and regulating the cost of diamonds..

      SARCASM

      Oh Right, increased demand will drive prices way down.

      /SARCASM

    3. Re:this is fantastic! by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      You can't define a word using the very same word, guy.

  37. Down with DeBeers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them burn in hell. (Michael, you too)

  38. I cant remember the tune by YellowSnow · · Score: 1

    Diamonds are a geeks best friend

  39. And in other news. by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

    USAF bombs South Africa in the mistaken belief that they are flying over Iraq.

  40. I'd better start planning now... by AlfaGiik · · Score: 1
    With these low interest rates I could take out a second mortgage for that new processor.

    /me heads over to ditech.com

  41. Diamond Age by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Another case of life imitating art... or at least catching up with it. To anyone interested in nanotechnology, I suggest reading the Neal Stephenson book "The Diamond Age".

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
    1. Re:Diamond Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Engines of Creation?

      One of the first steps of his idea of nanotechnology is to make nanoassemblers that work with nanocomputers. I'm not exactly holding my breath for this one.

  42. Cheap Jewelry by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    I don't know if they will be able to find enough of those diamond flecks (what they cut off while making REAL diamonds). It seems like people these days are buying more and more of that ghetto jewelry with diamond flecks. They might need to use the synthetic diamond material that is use in diamond cutting edges....

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  43. Ouch! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    I'd hate to pay for a beowulf cluster of those!!!

  44. Did this... Star Wars Research in 80's by snatchitup · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was at Auburn, we had Star Wars funding to look into this. We had created a diode that switched at 2000 celcius.

    The idea was to have IC circuits right inside the rocket engines.

  45. It'd almost be believeable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you weren't some suburban 15 year old white kid with too many 2Pac albums. Don't you have school, young man?

  46. Not likely.... by abouttime · · Score: 1

    One of the most important properties of silicon is the easy to form (both in thickness and control of growth rate) and stable oxide.

    Most of an integrated circuit is not active, and just exists for alignment errors and isolation of deplition regions.

    I really doubt that Diamond dioxide will be as easy to form as Silicon dioxide.

  47. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are pretty useful for cutting and sanding and also as coating for tools. actually, to cut silicon wafers you need diamond tools (try using a knife to scratch a silicon wafer: you can't - you will break the wafer or damage the knife but putting a scratch on polished silicon is not so easy. I tried it some days ago.).

  48. Worst nightmare: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Pentiums are forever????

  49. Re:first post by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    Diamonds aren't even the most expensive rock either, Rubies are since there aren't as much. Now the uses of a diamond greatly exceed a Ruby, since its the hardest rock can be used for drilling and the sort. Oh yes, its also Freezes best friend(batman).

  50. Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by ari_j · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute...

    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    This seems to be going quite in the opposite direction of superconductor research and what most people generally think of as sound design principles - less electrical resistance means a more efficient contraption, right? So what gives? I can't get to the article from here given my Christmas-reduced bandwidth, but is this a Slashdot misprint or is this the truth; and if it's real, then what gives? Why is higher electrical resistance suddenly an advantage?

  51. One thing they didn't mention... by crgrace · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is (at least) one key advantage silicon has over diamond (or any semiconductor except Germanium). It has a self-repairing crystal lattice. When dopant atoms (phosphorous, arsenic, etc.) are injected into the bulk silicon wafer using ion implantation (diffusion not used in practice too much anymore) they cause structural damage to the crystal lattice which would hurt circuit performace. However, Silicon has this magical property that if you heat it up to the right temperature (several hundred degrees Celcius) the lattice begins to reorganize itself to incorporate the dopant atoms without damage. Tis process is called Annealing and it is one of the key reasons Silicon became the dominant semiconductor (the other was the availability of a good thermal oxide, SiO2).

    Diamond does not have this desirable property, so a lot of research will have to go into maintaining the quality of the crystal lattice.

    1. Re:One thing they didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, Silicon has this magical property that if you heat it up to the right temperature (several hundred degrees Celcius) the lattice begins to reorganize itself to incorporate the dopant atoms without damage.

      I don't find this magical at all. It's just a consequence of the fact that Si atom reordering within the crystal is increasing with temperature; actually virtually every material has this property and can therefore be annealed. This works especially good with metals due to their non-covalent bond nature, whereas Si is rather difficult to anneal due to the covalent==directional Si-Si bonds. I expect that diamond will be harder to anneal simply due to its high melting point (3800 K, higher than tungsten) -> you have to anneal at higher temperatures. Another issue will be the diffusion of dopants at these high temperatures (also problematic for Cu in Si).

    2. Re:One thing they didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your missing a key amount of chemistry here, specifically, types of bonding. Carbon, when it forms the alletrope known as diamond is such that all bonds are sp3 hybridized (yes, you inorganic chemists out there may disagree with the concept of hybridization, but thats a moot point). What that means is that the carbon atoms in diamond are all covalently bonded. The situation is slightly different with silicon, where you have more of an ionic type bond formed, and the bonds aren't quite as localized. A silicon atom in a latice structure doesn't form as quitely well defined bonds as carbon. There is nothing magical about silicon complexes rearranging themselves at higher temperatures - its just a change in energy states that changes geometry.

      A side point - you can't "dope" diamond - introduction of a different element to the latice structure changes it to where it is techically not diamond anymore.

    3. Re:One thing they didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A side point - you can't "dope" diamond - introduction of a different element to the latice structure changes it to where it is techically not diamond anymore.

      I think this is still an open question. It's not at all obvious that the low amounts of dopants required will change the bandstructure of diamond dramatically (and it certainly won't turn into graphite).

  52. News was thin by mugnyte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's some background on diamond films:
    In July of this year, scientists in the United States reported that isotopically pure diamond films (containing 99.9% carbon-12 and not the 1% carbon-13 that is present in natural diamonds) had been grown. The pure films not only conducted hear 50% better than the best natural diamonds but also withstood damage by laser radiation ten times more effectively than natural diamond.

    One could have the concept of combining functions: Glass that serves as a semiconductor, etc. Interesting.

    I don't know if manufactured diamonds theaten the jewelry industry, but I doubt it. Although hundreds of almost-slaves labor in mines so deep it's scary, and the industry is full of creepy deals, people buy them, and the industry churns them out just the same.

    mug

    1. Re:News was thin by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      They do very much. I heard Debeers laser ingrave's thier diamonds now.

      http://www.russianbrilliants.net/

      I wonder if this process will be used to make the diamonds for cpu's?

      Crackers`n`Soup

  53. I can see it now.... by m_smitty · · Score: 1

    My fiancé waking up in the morning with her engagement ring missing. Finds me at my work bench mod'ing my PC with her ring, screaming "Scotty we need more power!"

    1. Re:I can see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it only in the US that engagement rings have to be diamonds or are there any other countries with this "tradition" ? I'm asking, because I'm from Europe, where engagement rings are usually plain gold rings (a diamond ring would be rather offending).

    2. Re:I can see it now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty much a north american tradition that supposedly first appeared in a movie. Not that I like it or anything. "Honey" can suck my dick if she thinks I'm forking out a few grand for a fucking DIAMOND. Even then, there are much better-looking and more valuable gemstones out there.

    3. Re:I can see it now.... by lvdrproject · · Score: 2
      fiancé
      n.

      A man to whom a woman is engaged to be married.


      Think you meant "fiancée", there, ace.

  54. Pilfering by el_flynn · · Score: 1
    I wonder if, once the technology becomes ubiquitious, this would cause a rise in PC-related thefts? Imagine a large fleet of Dell machines being hijacked and stripped for the diamond contents.

    And what about recycling machines that use those chips? Would we see an increase in dumpster diving habits? There'd probably be a lot more people spending time in dump sites combing through the trash to look for things like these.

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
    1. Re:Pilfering by BeeShoo · · Score: 2

      Not all diamonds are gem quality, and therefore, not as valuable (leaving aside for the moment the debate about the "value" of objects purely because they're shiny). In another life, or at least it seems that way, I was a machinist. Diamond cutting bits are quite common and desirable (for some jobs) because of their hardness. While these tools are more expensive, because they don't use gem quality diamonds, they aren't near as expensive as you would think.

      It's doubtful that any gem quality diamonds would ever be used for chips.

  55. Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when can I expect to see you people push for something other than the next penis compinsator?

    Com on realy now, your' not only intels little bitch but now your' Dew Burs' as well? Doesn't your anus hurt from take it up the ass already? jeez

  56. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by crgrace · · Score: 2

    I've said this already, but the article was confusing. They meant diamond has a can withstand higher temp. and voltage, not that it was higher resistance in an electrical sense. Their use of resistance had nothing to do with Ohm's Law. I guess the author didn't know about the way the phrase is generally used in electronics.

    Also, they are talking about semiconductors, not superconductors. Very different beasts.

  57. Abundance is driven by cost. by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    The more than something costs, the more practical refining lower quality ore or synthetics becomes. You do it on too large of a scale, however, and you flood the market, and you can't make a profit, so it's a fairly delicate balance.

    There may also be advances in detection technology, collection, or other factors that'll result in more expense, but with it, greater abundance.

    I mean, think about it... scientists and environmentalists keep talking about how we're going to run out of fossil fuels, but they always seem to keep extending out the critical date... It most likely will run out sooner or later, but the oil companies will keep finding a way to prolong it to make a profit as long as they can.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  58. Complete solution? by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes Diamonds are better than Silicon but:

    You still cannot get past some limmiting factors like speed of light and the absolute minnimum structure size.

    What the Japanease are looking into will be very large chips. Diamonds are the only good way to get a good yeilds of these. But still when you have a 10x10mm 100 GHz chip it takes several clock cycles to get some information from one side of the chip to the other.

    Normal design methodologies will no longer work in the near future just like they are starting to get difficult now. (Moore's Law slowing down)

    1. Re:Complete solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a waste of time to moan about the speed of light limit because it cannot be overcome. To solve the problem of race conditions on chips one has to carefully place the different working units according to timing and once we hit the integration limit (size of atom) we can still grow into the third dimension or increase parallelism.

    2. Re:Complete solution? by kaxman · · Score: 1

      It's like, if we can't make it any smaller, we'll just find something harder and smash a few trillion more electrons through it. Let me borrow freely. Figure out what'll melt it, and then back it off a little.

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  59. Diamond dioxide by YellowSnow · · Score: 1

    Diamond dioxide is actually incredibly easy to form AKA carbon dioxide, I've probably breathed out a few ounces today.

    1. Re:Diamond dioxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but does it stay where you want it or does it evaporate, what do you think?

    2. Re:Diamond dioxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It evaporates, which makes it useless. The comment on diamond dioxide is also silly.

  60. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    conduction is the opposite of resistance. Hence a semi-conductor could be called a semi-resistor, so to speak.

    Indeed diamonds are not semi-conductors but complete insulators and they dont pass current. Its rather bizarre but micro-electronics is not of the hardest classes. Its really a physics class to do with electron migration...

  61. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by rootus-rootus · · Score: 1

    Don't forget thet the pure Si substrate in a chip is an electrical insulator. You want to have the highest possible resistance in the insulator to prevent electron migration in the doped areas of the chip.

    --
    The moral of the story is: "Always remember to mount a scratch monkey."
  62. Becoming a CPU by thinkliberty · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I die maybe I can become a CPU! Thanks to intel and lifegems http://www.lifegems.com Maybe Intel will want to buy grandpa when he croaks. In the future you'll be able to get a faster processor everytime a loved one dies!

  63. bling, bling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose now we will see P.Diddy singing "It's all about the pentiums"...

  64. Gratuitous misogynist comments by YellowSnow · · Score: 4, Funny

    I got my girl a diamond earing so she had some processing power above the neck.
    Now SHE wants a beowulf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Gratuitous misogynist comments by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I got my girl a diamond earing so she had some processing power above the neck.

      Oh females have tons of processing power above the neck. It's just that they have different logic gates.

      Men have logic gates like AND, OR, NAND, NOR, and XOR.

      Women have logic gates like SOMETIMES, MAYBE, OCCATIONALLY, THE-OPPOSITE-OF-LAST-TIME, WHAT-DAY-OF-THE-MONTH-IS-IT, READ-MY-MIND-DAMNIT, OOOH!PRETTY-ROCKS!, and many others that no one has been able to figure out yet.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  65. a bit, OT, but diamonds are not rare... by venomkid · · Score: 1

    ...nor would they be expensive, were it not for diamond cartels in africa with a stranglehold on the mines.

    DeBeers Consolidated Mining Co. was started in the 1880s to accomplish exactly this. Control diamond supply in order to raise prices.

    To control demand, they invented the diamond engagement ring. They'll tell you it was invented in 1477, but this is just the first instance of an engagement ring being given with a diamond in it.

    The "Diamond Engagement Ring" standard wasn't established until their "A Diamond is Forever" advertising campaign started in the late 1930s. It's still going, with those cool shadow commercials.

    However, recently other mine companies have been gaining ground, and soon there will be more competition, but it's still gonna be a fight. ...

    The diamonds in these chips will be artificial, so i'm just randomly kickin knowledge here. Have fun with it, and if you're lucky, maybe your fiancé will understand and save you a few grand...

    --
    vk.
  66. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by crgrace · · Score: 2

    All useful semiconductors are actually semi-insulators: you need doping and bias to promote electrons to the conduction band. In fact, semiconductors are sometimes characterized by their "bandgap voltage" which means how much voltage is required to promote an electron from the valence band, where it is tightly held to the lattice, and the conduction band, where it can move freely as part of an electrical current. The thing that makes diamond withstand high temperatures and voltages, its high bandgap, is also on of the things that makes it hard to work with.

  67. Oh sh*t by e144539 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here come the carbon-based artificial life forms.

  68. In Robert Leach voice: by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    And a certain BLING, BABY!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  69. I'm calling BS on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way in hell is anyone yelling "Scotty we need more power!" even getting a date let alone a woman willing to marry him.

  70. the "bull" with the crystal/brass balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these guise do they ever quit?

    big excitment about some heavy duty star gazing & hand waving, resulting in the speculation buy the VAST majority of fine&shill analcysts overt at bearonstearno.con, saying that sum of our billyuns would be returning some time next year, as if buy magic, if we would be willing to make some more heavy bets on phony payper stock markup scams. those guise. sheesh!@#$% do they think that we're sheep?, or stupid/greedy/afraid? we'll show them. right robbIE?

  71. Diamond Data by notestein · · Score: 4, Informative

    The idea of using diamond as a semiconductor has been kicking around for years with quite a bit of research being done world wide.

    Technology Research News has an article published in September that discusses this.

    Among other things they mention that diamond's charge carrier mobility is three times better.

    Diamond transistors could in theory deliver one watt of power at 100 gigahertz, or billion cycles per second, said Isberg. This is five times faster has been achieved using the semiconductor Gallium Arsenide.

    Diamond-based electronics would also be better than existing semiconductor materials for high-temperature applications, said Isberg. Diamond conducts heat 15 times more efficiently than silicon, and therefore cools faster.

    etc. etc.

    1. Re:Diamond Data by xo0m · · Score: 1

      how much will these cost? on the avg that is...

  72. And now of course.... by b96miata · · Score: 2, Funny

    We cue the pseudo-gangsta asian kid saying "Even mah pc is iced out FOOOL!"

  73. I thought resistance was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main advantages of diamond include heat resistance and higher electrical resistance.

    I'm not an engineer, but I always thought that electrical resistance was bad for a CPU. (caused heat build-up)

    1. Re:I thought resistance was bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P = U^2/R

  74. Cutting edge technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan is always at the cutting edge of technology *COUGH*

    1. Re:Cutting edge technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because they are using Ninja skills in the technology field....

  75. Higher voltage AND higher speed?? by Rick.C · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm not a double-E, but aren't "higher speed" and "higher voltage" at opposite ends of the trade-off spectrum? It takes a finite time for the voltage to rise from "0" level to "1" level. A higher voltage threshold for the "1" ("ON") state should translate to a longer rise-time, si?

    Isn't that why faster CPUs have lower core voltages? Sure, you also get lower heat dissipation and power consumption, but isn't the primary reason speed?

    Rick.C - "Cleanliness is next to Godliness" -- um.. you must be using a -seriously- abridged dictionary!

    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    1. Re:Higher voltage AND higher speed?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're partly right... (I'm also not an EE...) Higher supply voltage needs better "slew rates", but higher slew rates are in fact higher frequencies - and IMHO it is P ~ f (power consumption proportional to the operating frequency) and also P ~ u^2 (power consumption proportional to the *square* of the supply voltage) another factor is the capacity... it is P ~ C.

  76. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What tradition? DeBeers started all that diamond shit in a stroke of marketing genius. What to do with all these worthless rocks? I know! Create a need!

  77. impossible math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, isn't it ?funny? how the # of anacysts who bulleave the stuck markup will go DOWn further, is 0?

    that's the "new" FraUDuleNT math/eye gas. whereas, everybody bulleaves just won thing.

    we're hoping God is too busy to have to watch this/US dooing such things (greed/fear based deception) to won another.

  78. Uh oh... by c_monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will we tell the people from the machines if we can't refer to them as carbon-based and silicon-based life anymore?

    --
    Read the full text my book Perl for the Web
  79. Some diamond facts. by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

    - Diamonds, as used in jewelry, are artificially rare. That's right.. the rock on your engagement ring is only rare because DeBeers & friends keep millions and millions of diamonds locked up in vaults. This is not conspiracy theory... it's a verifiable fact.

    - The average cost of diamond, if all diamonds available were in circulation, instead of in vaults, would be about $1.50 per ct.

    - Small diamonds, the kind used in diamond saws, industry, etcetera, are NOT expensive, like your engagement ring. Small diamonds are common and cheap, because they have no real jewelry market. Diamond impregnated stones and blades cost more because it costs more to manufacture them.. not because of the diamond.

    - Good luck convincing your girl of ANY of this. You still have to buy that rock. Get over it..

    1. Re:Some diamond facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to buy that rock if I don't have to buy that 1THz processor.

    2. Re:Some diamond facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know what you're doing, you won't have to buy that rock, and you'll have her thinking it was her idea. Splendid!

    3. Re:Some diamond facts. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Diplomacy: The art of letting other people do what you want.

  80. What overclocking? by zanderredux · · Score: 1

    Chip manufacturers would implement some sort of frequency cap, just as AMD did with the newer Athlon XP chips. Although the chips could stand the heat, would PCB boards do? Or the PC casing and wiring? Makes me think...

  81. Looking forward to my first diamond-based PC by pogen · · Score: 2

    How else can two months' salary last forever?

  82. even more MiSleading mumbull jumbull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  83. Pfft! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    And you guys thought they couldn't find a way to make computers really expensive again!

  84. On-going programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Here's the NIST funded research and development

    http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/sp950-1/diamond.htm

    http://www.diamondsemiconductor.com/homepage.htm

    There are other ways to produce diamonds (than DeBeers version) for this and other uses. Look at

    http://www.auburn.edu/~blumeri/diamond/diamond.h tm

    http://www.anl.gov/OPA/logos18-1/diamondfilm1.ht m ..and a lot of other places. Google it.

  85. The main advantages of diamond by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...include... higher electrical resistance.

    Is that all it takes? I have lots of stuff here that might be groundbreaking...

    World awed by carpet-based semiconductor

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    1. Re:The main advantages of diamond by RKloti · · Score: 1

      You might have some ESD problems with your carpet-based semiconductor. It had better be grounded.

  86. I'll buy one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it comes with a Platinum vents, 20 inch subs, blue lighted keyboard, and some nice curb feelers.

  87. Only a couple thousand degrees more.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we'll finally get that server on the Sun's
    surface.

    1. Re:Only a couple thousand degrees more.... by DuBois · · Score: 2
      I already have a Sun server...

      Oh wait... You didn't mean that kind of Sun.

      --
      The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  88. Re:Higher electrical resistance? Huh? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    very high resistance is good for the substrate, upon which you place your doped (conductive) materials for active components, and metals for "wires"....this keeps current leakage down.

  89. Wasn't there a specific reason why Si was used? by tstoneman · · Score: 1

    It's been 12 years since my semiconductors course, so forgive me, but wasn't there a specific reason why Si was used? It seems like it there were specific properties of silicon that made it more inherently valuable than carbon. I think the main thing was that since carbon and silicon are in the same columns on the periodic table, they shared similar chemical properties, but I seem to remember vaguely that silicon maybe interacted differently with the doped molecules that were added to make semiconductors?

    Bah. I'm going to have to open up my damn semiconductor books again when I get home. Goddamnit, I thought I was through with all that studying!!!

    1. Re:Wasn't there a specific reason why Si was used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Si was/is easier to obtain in pure crystalline form than C.

    2. Re:Wasn't there a specific reason why Si was used? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Funny

      They used to used vaccum tubes to build computers before. Some properties of vaccum tubes were inherently more valuable than heaps of sand.

      How is it that they aren't using vaccum tubes any more?

  90. SiO2 vs. CO2 by jmv · · Score: 2

    I wonder how they're going to replace SiO2 as an insulator. With silicon, if you want an insulator, you just add oxygen and heat a bit and you get an SiO2 (glass) layer, which is a good insulator. With Carbon (diamond), all you'd get is CO2, which is pretty useless (not to mention anti-Kyoto). They'll need a good (and cheap) insulator for carbon, don't remember what they did for GaAs, though...

    1. Re:SiO2 vs. CO2 by digital+photo · · Score: 1

      Diamond IS an insulator. An insulator to electrical current, but it is a very efficient heat conductor/radiator.

      Silicon is also an insulator. It is doped with Oxygen to improve the insulation factor and doped with other compounds(arsenic,gallium,phosphor,etc.) to improve conductivity and to create P and N regions.

      The question would be how one would get the doping to work for Diamonds.

      Personally, I think they will have to revert to particle accelerators. Since bombarding the carbon matrix of a diamon would be equivelent to doping... albeit at a much lower concentration level. Works well enough to turn a clear diamond blue...

    2. Re:SiO2 vs. CO2 by jmv · · Score: 2

      Diamond IS an insulator

      Pure Si is an insulator too, but not good enough for the ultra-thin gates of MOS transistors in current designs. Gate (leak) currents are already getting too large for SiO2 and I doubt that diamond is better than SiO2... Also, if you're doping, it's likely that you can't get pure-C (diamond) insulators.

      For doping, I guess there isn't much choice other than to use nitrogen and Boron with ion implant...

    3. Re:SiO2 vs. CO2 by digital+photo · · Score: 1

      Well, pure diamond won't be a problem since the doping process for diamond won't be the same for Si.

      If I remember correctly, Si is doped by overheating it and exposing it to a gaseos environment of the required doping agent. This causes a layer to be effectively doped. Subsequent UV/mask/doping layers is what builds up the Si based chips.

      With a diamond, I don't be believe that that would be feasible unless they incorporate the gaseous doping agents during the diamond layer process.

      All in all, the cost would be astronomical. What did the article say? It would costs thousands of dollars of a few square mm of a diamond wafer whereas the same for Si wafers is virtually free.

      It will be an interesting period... with what would be, I'm sure, equally spectactular plan "accidents". >:)

    4. Re:SiO2 vs. CO2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, Si is doped by overheating it and exposing it to a gaseos environment of the required doping agent. This causes a layer to be effectively doped. Subsequent UV/mask/doping layers is what builds up the Si based chips.

      There are two ways to dope Si: the one described by you: thermal diffusion of dopand into the depth of the wafer. disadvantage: not well defined doped-undoped interfaces. heating will affect all previous doping steps.

      The other way is Ion Implantation: You bombard the wafer with dopand ions (ions because you can't accelerate neutral atoms). advantages: possibility to make doped regions inside the wafer (not only on the surface) and generally have more control over doping profile (amount of doping at certain depth). better defined (sharper) interfaces. works at room temperature.
      disadvantage: lattice defects introduced by bombardment require annealing (heating).

  91. Carbon-based unit by tstoneman · · Score: 1

    Whoops, looks like the original Star Trek movie will have become obsolete now, since computers will also be carbon-based units as well!

  92. Will this replace their love of the ruby? by egg+troll · · Score: 2

    I thought everyone knew that the favorite gem of the Japanese was the Ruby!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  93. Dead people chips by gCGBD · · Score: 1

    You may recall the story on Slashdot from a few months ago Cremation? Burial? How about Diamonds? where the deceased can be cremated and turned into diamonds.

    Extending that idea just a little...

    It give a whole new meaning to naming a machine.

    ... "Log into Grandpa over there to see if he is up." ...

    ... "I used to have a family. Now I have a Beowulf cluster" ...

    --

    O=='=++
  94. More pollution! by salientpoints · · Score: 1

    With all this slashtalk about responsibly disposing of/recycling your hardware components something like this develops.

    Diamonds aren't biodegradable--in fact, they're reverse-biodegradable: under the earth, they become more diamondy through time.

    The Japanese will soon discover they will have diamond runoff from their landfills. This will get into their drinking water and they will ingest it and start developing diamond deposits in their joints.

    On the other hand, so to speak, if I ever get married I'll be wearing a pda on my ring finger

  95. the real p5 by sogo · · Score: 1

    The Next Generation of Processors: Pentium Diamond finally a name that doesn't include a number

  96. Give me a beowulf cluster of... by Hatechall · · Score: 1

    Never mind

  97. Diamonds can spontaneously combust. by digital+photo · · Score: 2, Funny

    True quartz has piezoelectric factors... but Diamonds can burn! Just like coal... except they explode due to the pressures inherit in their creation...

    Overclocker1: Shit, wonder how many more degrees I can clock this baby...

    Overclocker2: Did you remove the oxygen?

    Overclocker1: What? Why?

    *BOOM*

    Okay, maybe not that drastic... but it's pretty nasty.

  98. Hard != Strong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they teach this in school? things that are hard aren't necessarily strong, and are often quite fragile! You can SHATTER diamonds faily easily, you know like, say, glass, although it takes a bit more force. Another example is iron. Iron is stronger i.e. less likely to break, than steel, but it is soft and deforms. Steel is less likely to deform, but is much easier break into pieces.

  99. AMD... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "This property means that diamond chips can work at a much higher frequency or faster speed and be placed in a high-temperature environment, such as a vehicle's engine..." ... or an Athlon machine.

  100. Science paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Dawn for Carbon Electronics?
    Gehan A.J.Amaratunga
    Science 297 (2002) p.1658

    Pure carbon naturally forms two different crystalline materials: diamond, in which all bonds between carbon atoms are the same, and graphite, with two different types of bonds between the atoms. Because diamond is the higher energy form of the two, its natural occurrence is rare compared with that of graphite. In contrast,
    the lowest energy form of related elements such as silicon (Si) and germanium (Ge) has the same
    crystal structure as diamond, but no naturally occurring form like graphite.

    The quirk of nature that makes graphite the lowest energy form of carbon is the main reason it has not been used in electronic devices, in stark contrast to its neighbor in the periodic table, Si. A report by Isberg et al. on page 1670 of this issue provides hope that the time has come for diamond electronics (1).

    A material suitable for an electronic device must not conduct electrical current in its pure state at room temperature. However, it should be possible to tune its conductivity in a controllable manner by introducing trace amounts of impurity atoms (dopants). Such materials are termed "semiconductors".

    Graphitic carbon conducts electricity at room temperature. In contrast, diamond is a semiconductor with physical properties (such as maximum electric field, saturation velocity, thermal conductivity and band-gap) that make it the ideal material for electronic devices (2, 3). The major barrier to realizing this potential of diamond to date has been the difficulty in synthesizing it in a form that is pure and perfect enough for electronics.Natural diamonds (see the figure) have too many defects and impurities for use as semiconductors, regardless of the cost associated with their rarity. Only manufactured semiconductor materials are of the appropriate quality for electronics. Crystalline Si wafers used for electronics have impurity and crystalline defect densities that are lower than the atomic density by a factor of 10^-11 to 10^-12. Electronic grade Si is the purest bulk material known.

    The first artificial synthesis of diamond was reported in 1955 (4). It was achieved by subjecting graphite to high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) in the presence of a transition-metal catalyst. This method is now a standard industrial process. It yields diamonds with submicrometer to submillimeter dimensions that are used as grit in mechanical applications such as polishing. These applications exploit the extremely high hardness and chemical inertness of diamond. But until recently, the impurities and defects in HPHT-synthesized diamonds and their small size precluded their use in electronics.

    Alternative methods aimed to synthesize diamond from the vapor phase (5, 6). The first practical method for deposition of diamond from the vapor phase used a hydrocarbon plasma (7). This study heralded a burst of research activity aimed at exploiting the properties of diamond in electronic devices (8).

    However, plasma-deposited diamond is not a single crystal. It is made up of many individual crystal grains of 1 to 10 um in diameter that are oriented differently. Plasma-deposited diamond is polycrystalline when grown on a high-purity noncarbon substrate material, usually a Si wafer. Some success was achieved in growing diamond grains with the same crystal orientation on a different substrate (beta-SiC), and the resulting films showed promising electronic properties (9). But beta-SiC is also difficult to synthesize, and general progress was impaired by not having available diamond of the required quality.

    Over the past 2 years there have been renewed grounds for cautious optimism. High-quality HPHT diamonds in polished form with dimensions of many millimeters have become available, forming suitable substrates on which ultrapure diamond can be grown with a hydrocarbon plasma source(10). The fusion of the two methods for ynthesizing diamond artificially has led to the
    demonstration of single-crystal diamond layers that approach the quality required for electronic devices (11-13). Importantly, it has also been possible to control the conductivity of diamond layers by incorporating boron during plasma growth. Therefore, two of the key elements required from a semiconductor material suitable for electronic devices - a high-quality crystal that can be doped - are now achievable in diamond. The results reported by Isberg et al. (1) could be a watershed for carbon electronics.
    The authors have artificially synthesized diamond with electronic properties that surpass those expected from theory or measurements hitherto. In particular, they have measured the mobility of holes and electrons in their very high quality diamond. The mobility mu is a constant of proportionality that links the velocity v that a mobile charge carrier - an electron (-) or a hole (+) - achieves in a solid subjected to an electric force field E (v = mu * E).

    Isberg et al. have measured mobility values for low electric fields of 4500 cm^2/Vs for electrons and 3800 cm^2/Vs for holes in plasma-grown diamond. These are the highest values of mobility
    ever measured in diamond. The hole mobility measured in diamond is significantly greater than the electron mobility measured in SiC and GaN (see the table), two other wide-band-gap semiconductors currently explored for high-frequency (>10 GHz) and high-power density applications (14, 15).

    At present, the controlled change in the conductivity of diamond can only be achieved through increase of the hole concentration through boron doping. The results suggest that hole-conducting (p-type) diamond devices may be a practical and better option than electron-conducting (n-type) SiC or GaN for high-frequency and high-power electronic devices.

    THE LATEST MOBILITIES OF DIAMOND
    IN COMPARISON TO OTHER SEMICONDUCTORS


    Mobility [cm^2/Vs]:
    C: 4500(electrons), 3800(holes)
    SiC: 700(e)
    GaN: 2000(e)
    GaAs: 8500(e)
    Si: 1500(e), 450(h)
    Ge: 3900(e), 1900(h)

    Maximum electric field [V/cm]:
    C: 1e7
    SiC: 3e6
    GaN: 3e6
    GaAs: 4e5
    Si: 3.7e5
    Ge: 2e5

    Band-gap [eV]:
    C: 5.5
    SiC: 3.26
    GaN: 3.0
    GaAs: 1.42
    Si: 1.12
    Ge: 0.66

    References:
    1. J.Isberg et al.,Science 297 ,1670 (2002).
    2. M.W.Geis,N.N.Efremow,D.D.Rathman ,J.Vac.Sci. A6 ,1953 (1988).
    3. K.Shenai,R.S.Scott,B.J.Baliga,IEEE Trans.Electron.Devices 36 ,1811 (1989).
    4. F.P.Bundy et al.,Nature 176 ,51 (1955).
    5. J.C.Angus,H.A.Will,W.S.Stanko,J.Appl.Phys .39, 2915 (1968)
    6. B.V.Derayaguin et al.,J.Cryst.Growth 2 ,380 (1968).
    7. S.Matsumoto,Y.Sato,M.Kamo,N.Setaka,J.Mater.Sci .17 ,3106 (1982).
    8. G.Sh.Gildenblat,S.A.Grot,A.Badzian,Proc.IEEE 79, 647 (1991).
    9. H.Kawarada et al.,Appl.Phys.Lett .72 ,1878 (1998).
    10. H.Okushi,Diamond Relat.Mater .10 ,281 (2001).
    11. B.A.Fox et al.,Diamond Relat.Mater .4 ,622 (1995).
    12. A.V.Vescan,P.Gluche,W.Ebert,E.Kohn,IEEE Electron Device Lett.18 ,222 (1997).
    13. H.Taniuchi et al.,IEEE Electron Device Lett.22 ,390 (2001).
    14. S.-H.Ryu et al.,IEEE Electron Device Lett.23 ,321 (2002).
    15. L.Shen et al.,IEEE Electron Device Lett.22 ,457 (2001).

  101. This is NOT new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a Diamond video card!

  102. So, let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cyrix is going to make a comeback with their new Cubic Zerconia processors??

    It's gotta be fate..

    (btw, i tried to register.. never got my login info)

    JohnyElvis

  103. A Pentium 4 may be quite continental, by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    but diamonds are a geek's best friend.

    OK, I'll stop now.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  104. Perhaps they mean carbon semiconductors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over the last 10 to 15 years or so, there has been interest in using carbon based fabrication instead of silicon. I'm not a physicist and my memory could be fuzzy on this, but I think the idea is that Carbon can be induced to assume fairly large molecular configurations other than diamond, graphite and "coal", including "Buckyballs" by Smalley, Curl and Kroto and "Nanotubes". These forms have different electrical conducting properties than the other forms of carbon (in fact they act as semiconductors), permitting very small device size (at the molecular level). Doping is not needed, since the conducting paths are made of the same material (albeit in a different molecular configuration) as the rest of the wafer. For an introductory treatment, try this technology review article.

  105. Neglected to mention... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2

    Scuffing feet new trend in tablet-pc users

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  106. A diamond is forever... by laard · · Score: 1

    ...but this one becomes obsolete every three to six months!

    --
    --- If we knew half the things we shouldn't we'd stop wishing we knew it all
  107. Talk about a hot computer by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 2
    Diamond chips can work at a temperature of up to 1,000 degrees Celsius, while silicon chips stop working above 150 degrees Celsius,

    Yep. I can just see it now. Camouflaging my 4 processer server as a hot-plate. Problem is, when I set my computer to 'simmer' quake goes down to 158 frames/second.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  108. Best of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...when you give a diamond-based CPU to your wife and/or girlfriend, it turns her into a slut.

    (For those who don't get it, think about the diamond commercials that saturated the airwaves during the Xmas season the last few years, and were finally killed off in 2002.)

  109. Stephenson Ref? by Throatwarbler+Mangro · · Score: 1
    OK, I've just done a cursory search of this discussion, and you know what I've found?

    Not one reference to Neal Stephenson's Diamond Age!!!

    I know it's tangentially related at best, but c'mon people: This is Slashdot fer cryin' out loud!

  110. Boys best friend? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 2

    I think so.

  111. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    VMS Beer: Requires minimal user interaction, except for popping the top
    and sipping. However cans have been known on occasion to explode, or
    contain extremely un-beer-like contents.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...