Slashdot Mirror


How To Stop Piracy: Raid CD-R Moguls

An anonymous reader writes "In what appears to be a not-so-legal move, Mexico's equivalent of the RIAA used federal police to raid the installations of Grupo Mekong, responsible for 200 of the 400 million virgin CDs imported each year, accusing them to be "capos" of the Piracy bussiness in Mexico. What is the rationale? Record companies buy only 20% of Mekong merchandise, so the other 80% must be going to pirates! Yeah, Never mind computer users ,independent labels or other legal uses. You can see the article here but what amazes me is the behaviour! What will the next step be? Raid the truck companies who deliver the CDs? "

289 comments

  1. Let's take on Atmel! by shepd · · Score: 5, Funny

    A large percentage of their inventory is used for satellite piracy! Com'mon RIAA, can't you help out the poor satellite companies!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Let's take on Atmel! by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      I have waaay too many atmel chips now :)

  2. Well obiviosly by arcadum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With free trade, anyone, or anything that empides buisness, it will be knoced down, because unrestrected artificail bariers are null.

    1. Re:Well obiviosly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing your spelling won't impede business, else we'd all be screwed.

    2. Re:Well obiviosly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you translate that to English?

  3. English via google by MikeFM · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:English via google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's a GREAT help, thank you. ...

      Anyone who actually speaks Spanish care to translate?

    2. Re:English via google by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 5, Funny
      You thank often for informative very translation! Points of article veritably stated I address must:
      According to calculations of the Protective Derechos Association Intelectuales Fonogra'ficos (APDIF), the legal industry purchase per year 20 million discs, as soon as the 10 percent of 200 million that the Soli's matter and sell annually. For that reason they are indicated like the main suppliers of piracy in Mexico.
      Generalization infamous this argument specious is. Uses of numerous multiplicity disks can be made to have by consumer. To Piracy assume on simple stupidhead calcuations offhand make, demostrates syllogistically the logic that smells foul.
      Between the supposed denounced irregularities, Ildefonso Soli's indicated that in the operative one of the 18 of December, between the 7 million assured discs were 2,8 million units that were seized for the second time, which already had been given back them by Property because the merchandise were legal.
      Here weighings awesome of judegmental facts against poor law enforcement lean. Own actions police of past show virgin discs to of unassailable purity innocence uses comprised having been. Whole issue of suspicion frequently corruption singing quietly from under floorboards it cannot be dodged.
    3. Re:English via google by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a bit like talking to Yoda isn't it? Lucky for me I lived in Miami for a while so I'm used to detangling this sort of thing. To bad I couldn't manage to pick up any of the non-English langs while I was at it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:English via google by crow23 · · Score: 1

      Yoda proud, very is...

    5. Re:English via google by SparkyMartin · · Score: 2, Funny

      How are you gentlemen? Are you Captain, Mechanic, or Cats? This situation is not for great justice. You know what you doing, move zig!

    6. Re:English via google by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Not to rag on google or the translation doodad, but it does amaze me that a Spanish-to-English translation could get mangled this badly -- being that Spanish is probably the most straightforward of the major languages. Even con solamente un ano de la clase de Espanol demaciados anos pasados (30 to be exact) and only light exposure to L.A. Spanglish since then, I got more sense out of the original Spanish!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:English via google by PD · · Score: 1

      Computer programmers have no trouble with this. Push the nouns onto the stack, and pop them off with verbs. Simple.

    8. Re:English via google by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Have you ever written a translation engine? It's really complicated especially if you want the resulting engine to be able to work quickly under heavy load. IMO it's easier to write an engine that derives meaning from what it reads (like a bot) than it is to try to translate. I do think the Google one could be a bit better on word order but since it's free and fast I can't complain. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:English via google by protohiro1 · · Score: 2

      I decided I was really getting good at french when babelfish stopped being useful. And when anything I wrote came out as gibberish/

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    10. Re:English via google by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Dude, you made my day. Thanks.

  4. No Hablas Espanol by Celandro · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Como?

    1. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you speak spanish to be able to type the subject and ask "what" in the body of your message.

    2. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were referring to youself, you would use the word hablo. Hablas would refer to he/she/it or you (formal)

      Also, it's español not espanol.

      Yo no hablo español

    3. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Hablas is the second person singular (i.e. "you") form of hablar. Habla would be for third person singular ("he/she/it, you (formal)").

    4. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hablas would refer to he/she/it or you

      Casi casi pero no ;)

      Hablas would refer to 'you'. Habla would refer to he/she/it.

    5. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate people like you. You're right, I mixed them up. You're the greatest. I bow to your knowledge.

      Metete un palo en el culo, pendejo.

    6. Re:No Hablas Espanol by nhaines · · Score: 1

      What can I say? If you're going to post to correct someone professing little to no knowlegde in a particular field, maybe it pays to proofread your post once. Or to be competent enough to actually make the correction.

      Yeah, I think I'll say just that.

      You "mixed them up"? So you're not a native speaker either, hm? No matter, I assume you meant well and just made a simple mistake--you should see me answer people's German questions. Ugh. I'll even be brave enough to not post this anomymously, how's that?

    7. Re:No Hablas Espanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think he was making fun of the parent poster. The correct form is actually hablo -- the way the sentence is phrased in the root message indicates this subject.

      As for Metete un palo en el culo, pendejo, well, he told the parent poster to "go put a stick up [his] ass, fucker."

  5. capo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have heard this term "capo" before i was just wondering wtf it means

    1. Re:capo? by teasea · · Score: 1

      Feel free to correct me. I believe it is Italian and means 'top'. With the Godfather movies, the Sopranos, and all the other Italian mobster stuff, you hear it all the the time.

    2. Re:capo? by AeternitasXIII · · Score: 1

      Capo is derived from latin for head. In this case its typically the head of a mafia family in a given region.

    3. Re:capo? by Osty · · Score: 1

      Capo, the head of a branch of an organized crime syndicate. (Also a piece of hardware for guitars or other similar instruments, but that's not what's being referred to here, and it's pronounced differently, being "kay'-poh", and not "kaa'-poh"). It's Italian for "head". The full form of the term used by the Italian mafia was "caporegime".

    4. Re:capo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Capo" in Italian is used to refer to "head", "top" and "boss"; in all circumstances those words can appear in English.

    5. Re:capo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In italian means chief, boss, etc: someone who leads others, not necessarily in a criminal context.
      It also means head (the thing used by most to keep ears separated each other).

    6. Re:capo? by cookd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A capo is used to adjust a guitar's pitch higher or lower so that the same chord patterns can be used but different actual chords are produced. For example, if you learn to play a song using the C, F, and G7 chords, but need to play it in a different key (perhaps your vocalist can't sing in that range, or perhaps you want to play along with the original band that plays using D, G, A7), you can put a capo on so that the same hand pattern that normally makes a C chord now makes a D chord.

      Or perhaps you were talking about a different kind of capo...

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    7. Re:capo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as the mafia, I don't know where you people get these ideas.

      It's all made up.

    8. Re:capo? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      Capo is derived from latin for head.

      As in "give me some capo, baby"?

    9. Re:capo? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      It's used in Mexico to adorn drug dealer names in news reports. Apparently "NarcoKing" didn't take well. And of course, "CDRPirateMogul" doesn't look well, either.

      But seriously, I believe it comes from a term used in Italy to describe crime bosses.

  6. Bauxite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arrest all companies mining bauxite, because that makes aluminium, and thats used in the manufacture of CD's

    1. Re:Bauxite! by NTmatter · · Score: 0, Troll

      The next logical step here is to stop the manufacture and distribution of Sharpie Permanent Markers, due to their widespread use in labelling pirated CD's.

    2. Re:Bauxite! by agallagh42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, sharpies are too fat. I prefer Staedtler Lumocolor permanent markers. The black super-fine of course, model 313-9. Very fine, very permanent, and also lightfast and waterproof.

      Sharpies are for labelling your underwear when you go to camp.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  7. Link is in Spanish by videodriverguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It might have been worth pointing out that the linked article is in Spanish, for those slashdotters who actually read the articles but can't speak Spanish.

    1. Re:Link is in Spanish by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2

      Cut & Paste.. (sigh) English translation.

      http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A% 2F %2Fwww.reforma.com%2Fnacional%2Farticulo%2F256682% 2F&langpair=es%7Cen&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&prev=%2Fla nguage_tools

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    2. Re:Link is in Spanish by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

      yeah... and babelfish totally mangled it.

      Good for translating words, but the syntax was atrocious.

      I'd comment on the article, but I can't make sense of it... any native spanish speakers wanna translate for this poor semi-spanish-speaking gringo?

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    3. Re:Link is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an idiot...search before you complain...

    4. Re:Link is in Spanish by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      for those slashdotters who actually read the articles

      So YOU'RE the one!

      What, you expect special treatment? ;-)

    5. Re:Link is in Spanish by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

      Thank you - best laugh all day.

    6. Re:Link is in Spanish by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Ha, I even sorta-read the original Spanish article, so there! (Having given up on the google translation..)

      But per a good translation posted up above, it looks like this time the bandwagon crowd was right. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Link is in Spanish by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Even if they were right, it was for the wrong reasons. So there. :)

      This is a great example of bad translations fueling wild speculation. Never mind the general unreliability of the media when it comes to the details.

      Here is an interesting post by a Mexican reader, reflecting some of the translation and cultural differences. For example, he says "arraigo" doesn't translate into SWAT raid.

      BTW, I can certainly understand the appeal of a cheap CD in a country where even $10 must seem exorbitant; on the other I'd expect most of the buyers are fairly well off by Mexican standards (if they're buying any number of luxury items). But even the (not wealthy) gov't loses a lot of money to piracy, because it doesn't get to tax the profits.

  8. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the evil pirate moguls raid the poor media companies!

  9. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1=1
    1/3=1/3 .3333...=1/3
    (3)(.333..)=1 .99999...=1

    its all true

  10. English translation by Maskirovka · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Loose english translation here

  11. Rooting "them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To them they gave a shelter them so that they loosen them, but the PGR rooted them to initiate their investigations, of there our preoccupation because in the style of the previous Governments they are trying to make some crime that does not exist or to seed something to us to accuse of to us which never they have found to us.
    Whoever this PGR is, I hope this tactic of rooting whatever they rooted to initiate an investigation stays south of the border.
  12. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you probably can't because 0.9 recuring is not 1.

    If you put it this way, it makes slightly more sense, (but still, it's not what you say it is):

    lim (1 - 1/x) = 1 when x->infinity.

    That's a limit, not an equality.

  13. this must be another branch by manofherb · · Score: 1

    in the news today:

    the DEA announces that they are sharing investigational tactics with the RIAA thus ensuring that the only ones that control anything have names that end in a

    they then started a database of drug using musicians and started recording(carnivore) all known recordable activity of the people that listen to their music thinking they have to be involved with terrorism(drugs) due to the the influence of drugs in their music

    in the end the riaa refused to pay the DEA for their contributions(helping them become dictators) and booted them out of their country which only allows you to listen to the number one song of the week("We Own Yo Mizzy Bizzy doublestate" - The RIAA)

    Go Here for independent music Tech N9ne representing

    1. Re:this must be another branch by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Your mention of the DEA reminded me that this is not an unprecidented action. There are many chemicals used in the manufacture of illegal recreational drugs that will draw a lot of attention similar to this.

      Of course, there are other legal uses for most of these chemicals, but it has been known for warrants to be issued using this as one of the reasons for it. The same is true of explosives and nuclear material. If you start ordering some suspect materials, the it's fair to say that it may bring you under an element of suspicion yourself.

  14. Hexdump of story submittal. Viva the Mexican RIAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    0000000: 416e 2061 6e6f 6e79 6d6f 7573 2072 6561 An anonymous rea
    0000010: 6465 7220 7772 6974 6573 2022 496e 2077 der writes "In w
    0000020: 6861 7420 6170 7065 6172 7320 746f 2062 hat appears to b
    0000030: 6520 6120 6e6f 742d 736f 2d6c 6567 616c e a not-so-legal
    0000040: 206d 6f76 652c 204d 6578 6963 6f27 7320 move, Mexico's
    0000050: 6571 7569 7661 6c65 6e74 206f 6620 7468 equivalent of th
    0000060: 6520 5249 4141 2075 7365 6420 6665 6465 e RIAA used fede
    0000070: 7261 6c20 706f 6c69 6365 2074 6f20 7261 ral police to ra
    0000080: 6964 2074 6865 2069 6e73 7461 6c6c 6174 id the installat
    0000090: 696f 6e73 206f 6620 4772 7570 6f20 4d65 ions of Grupo Me
    00000a0: 6b6f 6e67 2c20 7265 7370 6f6e 7369 626c kong, responsibl
    00000b0: 6520 666f 7220 3230 3020 6f66 2074 6865 e for 200 of the
    00000c0: 2034 3030 206d 696c 6c69 6f6e 2076 6972 400 million vir
    00000d0: 6769 6e20 4344 7320 696d 706f 7274 6564 gin CDs imported
    00000e0: 2065 6163 6820 7965 6172 2c20 6163 6375 each year, accu
    00000f0: 7369 6e67 2074 6865 6d20 746f 2062 6520 sing them to be
    0000100: 2263 6170 6f73 2220 6f66 2074 6865 2050 "capos" of the P
    0000110: 6972 6163 7920 6275 7373 696e 6573 7320 iracy bussiness
    0000120: 696e 204d 6578 6963 6f2e 2057 6861 7420 in Mexico. What
    0000130: 6973 2074 6865 2072 6174 696f 6e61 6c65 is the rationale
    0000140: 3f20 5265 636f 7264 2063 6f6d 7061 6e69 ? Record compani
    0000150: 6573 2062 7579 206f 6e6c 7920 3230 2520 es buy only 20%
    0000160: 6f66 204d 656b 6f6e 6720 6d65 7263 6861 of Mekong mercha
    0000170: 6e64 6973 652c 2073 6f20 7468 6520 6f74 ndise, so the ot
    0000180: 6865 7220 3830 2520 6d75 7374 2062 6520 her 80% must be
    0000190: 676f 696e 6720 746f 2070 6972 6174 6573 going to pirates
    00001a0: 2120 5965 6168 2c20 4e65 7665 7220 6d69 ! Yeah, Never mi
    00001b0: 6e64 2063 6f6d 7075 7465 7220 7573 6572 nd computer user
    00001c0: 7320 2c69 6e64 6570 656e 6465 6e74 206c s ,independent l
    00001d0: 6162 656c 7320 6f72 206f 7468 6572 206c abels or other l
    00001e0: 6567 616c 2075 7365 732e 2059 6f75 2063 egal uses. You c
    00001f0: 616e 2073 6565 2074 6865 2061 7274 6963 an see the artic
    0000200: 6c65 2068 6572 6520 6275 7420 7768 6174 le here but what
    0000210: 2061 6d61 7a65 7320 6d65 2069 7320 7468 amazes me is th
    0000220: 6520 6265 6861 7669 6f75 7221 2057 6861 e behaviour! Wha
    0000230: 7420 7769 6c6c 2074 6865 206e 6578 7420 t will the next
    0000240: 7374 6570 2062 653f 2052 6169 6420 7468 step be? Raid th
    0000250: 6520 7472 7563 6b20 636f 6d70 616e 6965 e truck companie
    0000260: 7320 7768 6f20 6465 6c69 7665 7220 7468 s who deliver th
    0000270: 6520 4344 733f 2022 0a e CDs? ".
  15. I'd like to see ... by Buran · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see 'em raid the trucks The Fast and the Furious-style. Imagine Hilary Rosen driving one of those Civics and cursing in Spanish at the truck driver. Imagine Jack Valenti hanging from the side of the truck getting his arm cut off while his lobbyist pals in some more black Civics try to save him.

    Or...

    "I'd like to live, just long enough, to see them put your head on a pike as a reminder to the next ten generations that some boy band music comes at too high a price. I'd like to look up into your lifeless eyes, and wave, like this..."

  16. Even an idiot could see... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That the tyre manufacturers have to be stopped.

    They are giving the truck manufacturers all the ammunition they need to make trucks.

    Trucks give these so-called truck companies the very tools needed to have a truck company, which provides a perfect cocktail for the CD-R retailers to get their greedy, dishonest hands on the product.

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:Even an idiot could see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is a "tyre"? You British people shouldn't be allowed to speak the Queen's English (as it is properly spoken in Canada).

    2. Re:Even an idiot could see... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      A 'tyre', as defined by Collins English Dictionary, is:

      tyre n a ring of rubber, usually filled with air but sometimes solid, fitted round the rim of a wheel of a road vehicle to grip the road. or US tire.

  17. CD's not CDR's? by suss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, Never mind computer users ,independent labels or other legal uses.

    It looks more like these are CD's that have to be pressed, not CDR's useable by computer users.

    Don't these CD's have to be pressed in a factory?

    Anyway, it's inexcuseable, but probably something the RIAA would do too if they could get away with it.

    1. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't these CD's have to be pressed in a factory?

      Yes, but I'm sure RIAA skillfully ignored all those COMPUTER SOFTWARE DISCS that have to be pressed.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:CD's not CDR's? by dWhisper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would have to assume that the RIAA would have us all listening to music after we crawled to them to get it, if they could get away with it.

      And I don't believe it's a matter of pressing, it'd just need to be done in an industrial burner. Something like a rackmount system that took 1 real CD and dumped out 20 copies.

      I can understand them wanting to shut down things like this, but honestly, this step is going a little overboard for the need of raids. What's funny is they probably had to pull the Narcotic guys off stopping drug dealers to round up all the CDRs.

    3. Re:CD's not CDR's? by lpontiac · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, but I'm sure RIAA skillfully ignored all those COMPUTER SOFTWARE DISCS that have to be pressed.

      And AOL probably presses more discs than every record label in the world combined..

    4. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      And AOL probably presses more discs than every record label in the world combined..

      Er, AOL Time Warner is one of the Big Five* labels. Home to Madonna, among others. Still, I bet their junkmail department accounts for a huge volume - is there actually any point to it? Surely by now everyone with a PC has several, and is sick of the sight of them by now... * - Soon to be the Big Four, perhaps; Mariah Carey's old label is in a pretty bad way, laying off a lot of staff and cutting artists...

    5. Re:CD's not CDR's? by dfeist · · Score: 1

      You don't press CDs if you only sell in amounts of some thousand, because it's to expensive. It's again the way many people think - they ignore that there are people who do not produce for the mass market, but only for few people. But many only see what the big companies do, and so, CD-Rs can only be for illegal uses.

      --
      Unix makes easy tasks hard and hard tasks possible. Windows makes easy tasks easy and hard tasks $29.95.
    6. Re:CD's not CDR's? by kevinvee · · Score: 1

      but probably something the RIAA would do too if they could get away with it.

      I'm sure if selling sharpies is outlawed by the DMCA, it includes a 'whack-the-improbable-supplier' clause as well.

    7. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sick of them! They make great coasters and frisbees.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    8. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes, but why let little things like "the facts" and "the truth" get in the way of a good slashdot zealot rant. DOWN WITH THE RIAA! DOWN WITH MICROSOFT!

      Besides, all those CD's were actually LINUX DISCS.

    9. Re:CD's not CDR's? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Funny

      And AOL probably presses more discs than every record label in the world combined..

      I suddenly find myself ambivalent about this whole affair.

    10. Re:CD's not CDR's? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "They make great coasters and frisbees"

      They make horrible coasters. Condensation collects on the bottom of a CD, liquid goes right through the hole, and you end up with a worse situation than you would just with the cup on the bare wood.

      They make very dangerous Frisbees (TM). They have a bad uncontrollable flight, and they tend to shatter.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:CD's not CDR's? by wastaz · · Score: 1

      However, they do make very good targets for target practice. Keep that in mind folks the next time you recieve an AOL cd. ^_^

    12. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      That's a vile thought. People catching on that the War on Drugs is mostly a way of keeping a paramilitary militia active? Declare a War on Terror! Uh oh, those damn Christ-killing liberal media bitches are daring to ask what the actual connection is between fundamentalist Al Quada and the secular regime in Iraq. What can we demonize next?

      Pirates are pretty scary, right? And Joe Sixpack hates Poindexters, and everyone that burns CD's is a Poindexter, right?

      Let's have a War on Copying.

      It's such a vile thought that it's almost certainly true.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  18. Don't doubt it! by Martigan80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What will the next step be? Raid the truck companies who deliver the CDs?

    Well don'tdoubt it; anything that would constitute probable cause will lead them there. Anything that is touched by the merchandise is evidence. The harsh way to look at it but now that they have access to an area they will look for anything else that might be "wrong". That is basic investigation work. Sure that is not your main focus BUT you are also told to look for anything else, so ... this leaves a lot of ambiguity and speculation. Also leaves you open to other probes.

    It is nice to see that they are working with other agencies though! ;-)

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  19. Re:um... profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    update your bookmarks, sweetie, this is slashdot and not somethingawful.

  20. From the title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought there was some new form of Raiding mutliple CDR disks to backup data lol.

  21. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try again later. The answer over yours is the correct one. There are other demostrations of 0.999...=1. If you don't believe me, just you try to solve this: 1-0.9999... = ?

    The Infinity is like this, sometimes really curious...

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-0.9999... = 0.000...001

    2. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case. 0.000..001 = 0.

    3. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is "approximately" equal to 0, but not exactly equal.

    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is "approximately" equal to 0, but not exactly equal.

      The question is: 1 - 0.999...? 0.999... is not approximately equal to 1, it is just 1. There are a pair of demostrations in this thread. If you try to substract 0.999... from 1 you get a 0 with an infinite number of zeros behind the coma, that is, just 0. :)

    5. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were "just 1" it would be written as "1", not "0.999..." They are written differently because they ARE different.

      0.999... APPROACHES 1, but never equals it. These demonstrations are wrong because 0.333... APPROACHES 1/3 but it is never EXACTLY 1/3. This is the incorrect assumption that leads to the fucked answer in the end.

  22. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from an engineers point of view it's close enough to 1. I think it was 16 decimal places of accuracy that got us to the moon, so be brave and call a reoccurring .99 a 1.

  23. You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    They say to not know that they make other industries with the virgin discs that sell to them

    Notice the dateline is "City of Mexico." I imagine President Bush lives in the "House of White."

    How long before we have an international incident because someone relied on these freebie translators? Imagine the U.S. using google to save time going through all those docs from Saddam Hussein ("My God! He's stockpiled 36,000 sticks of weaponized rancid butter!").

    *

    I searched for "Mekong Group" (kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting there: "The Mekong group comprises Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and China's Yunnan province, all of which border the Mekong River.") No luck.

    However, from reading the article in Spanish (and I don't speak Spanish) I get the impression that the actual allegation is that the Group knowingly sold millions of discs "off the books" and can't account for them in their invoicing. If true, the action doesn't sound so unreasonable, as it suggests they knew they were doing something fishy. "Suggests" -- who knows? But this doesn't sound like a suspicionless search, and not at all Orwellian.

    1. Re:You call that translation? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

      Plus it's mexico. Hear lots of good things about their police, there. Right.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:You call that translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like tax evasion. If they are selling them to pirates no need to keep them off the books. Blank CDs are legal, even in Mexico, so if long john silver is buying them, there ain't nothing wrong with that...

    3. Re:You call that translation? by stoops · · Score: 1

      Notice the dateline is "City of Mexico." I imagine President Bush lives in the "House of White."

      nothing wrong with saying "The City of New York"... it's certainly not comparable to saying the "House of White". why is Mexico City so different?

    4. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      It's different because you just called it Mexico City. No one in the States would call it City of Mexico, even though in Spanish it is Ciudad de Mexico. Becuase the translator has no understanding of idiom or grammar, it muddles right past that.

      The translator would for the same reason not reverse White House. However, that would be a mistake in languages where the adjective follows the noun. In Spanish, White House translates as Casa Blanca, or in French Maison Blanche. So I imagine they would hear "House of White" or a similar malapropism, because "White" literally is an adjective.

    5. Re:You call that translation? by rnash · · Score: 1

      (A little offtopic)

      In in a novel written in 1969, Galactic Pot-healer, by Philip K Dick, the author had imagined a game which consisted in finding the original quote/title after 2 translations made by computer systems:

      original language -> foreign language then foreign language -> original language.

      by the way, this man had also foreseen "The lord of the rings" on a video disc, in A maze of death, 1970.

    6. Re:You call that translation? by ninewands · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Quoth the poster:
      I searched for "Mekong Group" (kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting there: "The Mekong group comprises Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and China's Yunnan province, all of which border the Mekong River.") No luck.

      Nice to know your Google grepping skills are so well developed. The company, being Mexican, has a Spanish name. They are "Grupo Mekong, not "Mekong Group." Also, being a Mexican company, they are not terribly troubled by things that are "kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting ...".

      Let's see ... from their "Productos" page, it appears that they sell to Gauss CD, SONY, TDK, Verbatim ... sounds like burnable CD-Rs that are usable for both audio mastering and data to me ... I don't know if Mexican law provides for lawsuits on the basis of "malicious prosecution" or "abuse of legal process" like Anglo-American law does, but it would certainly be interesting to see what evidence APDIF would present to justify this raid.
    7. Re:You call that translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >Notice the dateline is "City of Mexico." I imagine President Bush
      >lives in the "House of White."
      >
      Well President Bush *IS* white and surrounds himself with neo-racists like Ashcoft and Lott....

    8. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      I hope they don't hire you as their defense attorney! You don't appear to know American law, either, or what malicious prosecution even is, and how you read it into these facts is impossible to imagine.

      You missed the point of the article and my post: supposedly they've been selling millions of under-the-table CD's in addition to millions more to legit companies.

      Google does not do grep, if you know what it is, it's about as far from it as a keyword-searcher can be. You wasted time repeating another post. Remarkably I was looking for references to it in English so I searched for its name in English. Because I don't speak Spanish. Which I said. So I searched for "Mekong Group." In English. And the Mekong connotation has nothing to do with what anyonw is "trouble" about. It's a connotation, get it?

      Hope that clears up the details. Sorry to have confused you.

    9. Re:You call that translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus Connie Rice and Colin Powell. Yeah, I know....

    10. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Considering the incredibly corrupt state of Mexican law enforcement, not to mention of certain business interests -- regardless of the actual charge, I'd guess the action was precipitated by a well-placed bribe. And maybe it wasn't out of the blue, but consider: what if it happened here? What if the **AA thought that the makers of blank disks were selling them under the table to the large-scale pirates, and decided a nice cozy FBI raid, complete with mass confiscations, was just the thing??

      Er.... come to think of it, we already have the BSA pretty much getting away with this wrt software audits.

      Ya know, DEA raids set a hideously bad example...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Ha, I can out-cynic you any day. If it turns on bribery, I'd suggest that the raid occurred because the target failed to pony up an even larger counterbribe.

      I imagine the bootleggers are better connected in the Mexican government, and that these raids are only coming from enormous foreign (American) pressure. But that in itself does not prove the raids are illegitimate; there is staggering piracy going on, with Mexico City as the epicenter; and indeed if you were going to buy a raid, wouldn't you pick an actual enemy? I suspect there was at least some grounds to question their books. But no, I don't take the Mexican gov't's credibility for granted -- or the Mexican media's. :)

      "A cynic is a person searching for an honest man,
      with a stolen lantern."

    12. Re:You call that translation? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      If they really were selling huge amounts of blanks on the black market to pirates I would hope that they would get in lots of trouble. They are fueling a type of priracy that from what I gathered the majority of slashdotters don't support. And they are cheating on their taxes in a way that costs everyone money. Also the money laundering side of things would quite likley involve funding all other sorts of no good.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    13. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, there is that -- wouldn't surprise me at all if it was really a case of "late on the protection money again? Tsk. Either pay a second bribe or Bad Things will happen!"

      Being lazy, I'll answer AvitarX in this same post.. So, if you're selling large numbers of ball-peen hammers that people are using to bash in car windows so they can steal stereos, should we hope that the cops shut down your hardware store?

      "No one goes from idealism to realism; there's a cynical stage inbetween." -- Sir Fred Hoyle (IIRC)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      So, if you're selling large numbers of ball-peen hammers that people are using to bash in car windows so they can steal stereos, should we hope that the cops shut down your hardware store?

      The key is knowledge. If a guy comes in your gun shop and you ask, "What are you going to use it for?" and he says, "I want a gun to shoot my wife." then you'd best take a pass. I'm not even sure selling would be illegal but I just think it's be better to refrain. You wouldn't I believe had a responsibility to report him to the police, but I'd probably do that, too. In a pinch, sell him a broken gun. Or one of the backwards-firing ones from that Bond movie.

      In NYC they actually banned the sale of spraypaint to kids because of graffiti. An especially problematice hardware store item has been $1.95 box cutters, used for everything from muggings to hijackings. I have no idea wha can or should be done, but sometimes benign items like blank CD's (notice how he skillfully glides back on-topic) can have destructive consequences.

    15. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it's still shooting the messenger. And there's some question in my mind as to whether a seller even has a *right* to know what his products are used for. Not to mention that the whole thing is a rather well-greased slope. If I buy a truckload of fertilizer and a tank of diesel, do I plan to make a bomb or run my tractor and fertilize my fields? Should I be judged "likely of guilt" in advance??

      In fact -- looks like we ought to add a new verdict: no longer will someone be merely "guilty" or "innocent". The new option, in the name of crime prevention at any cost, will be "preemptively guilty".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      But it's still shooting the messenger.

      Oh, I do that, too.

      a rather well-greased slope

      Oh, we're already there. An implied example might be the Nichols trial. Actually there it is a tougher question of constructive knowledge, or shouldn't Nichols have realized what was going on? This assumes he isn't simply lying.

      Reagardless of the details of this or any case, it is existing law that you can be reponsible for a crime without pulling the trigger, whether as a conspirator, accomplice, accessory. That liability might even be just civil. This liability is not absolute, it depends on the character of your participation, what you knew, and when you knew it.

      I don't know the precise rules with regard to a merchant selling something to a soon-to-be criminal. But there is the possibility in there somewhere, particularly where the merchant knows of an imminent threat to a third party. Try to think of the ugliest possible facts, like the person announces, "Sell me this gun so I can go shoot my wife waiting in the car," and so on; at some point it should feel like too much. Then it is simply a matter of drawing the line.

      This sounds kind of unfair because the defendant didn't "do" anything to the victim, but a good part of the analysis is about economics not morals. It is efficient to hold the defendant to a duty of care to prevent bad acts by others to others. One common example is the "dram shop acts" holding liable bars and restaurants that serve too many drinks to someone who goes out and runs over someone. Another example is that you can be liable for leaving your keys in the car, or worse leaving the car running (which in most places is illegal, too), if someone steals the car and runs over people. Yes, technically you didn't "do it" but you certainly enabled it, and the point is the safety of society more than condemning an individual.

      Here is a random hit from the web, a "sale of bullets" case that appears to me correct (I skimmed it). Note that this is a civil case, and the court basically found that the plaintiff's legal arguments might be valid but needed to be developed factually in the trial court. The court did not look at who should win, just whether the plaintiff could win under their various theories of the case.

      I'm not justifying any of this so much as saying it is already the law, adn has been for many years.

    17. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      See if I ever bring *you* bad news ;)

      Yeah, I know "proximate duty" (or whatever all names it goes under) is on the books, but it's all corner cases and if/maybes. I think it behooves us to try to avoid creating such tangles insofar as is practical, because otherwise it's easy for it to swing too far. Frex, if I know my neighbour is a nut, but I don't go over and nail his door shut, or fail to put up a "beware of boogey-man" sign, am I liable when some night he doesn't take his lithium, and goes forth to murder random passersby?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Yes, but without slippery slopes there would be far fewer jobs for lawyers.

      The slippery slope argument is usually excessive, such as saying that to allow the government to impose a speed limit risks that one day they will set it to zero. Sure, maybe, but there are political and in extremis constitutional checks on things going to far. I assume that at some point holding someone liable for the acts of another would violate substantive due process. Believe me this has been debated for years, perhaps most famously in Palsgraf . Look for critiques of that one and your evening is all sewed up.

      Leave Frex alone. :) And if you worry that the law expects too much of you, note that if you see Frex stick a knife in someone you have no obligation to call the poilce or help the victim. You have to have some positive involvement in the event, and are otherwise free to watch someone drown with impunity, no matter how easily you could have helped. Little oddities of the law.

    19. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Oh, I see, ulterior motives! Artists starve for their art, why shouldn't lawyers starve for their laws? [gd&rlh]

      Hmmm.. aren't there some "if you see X and can help, you must help" laws on some books? I vaguely recall some case where someone got in legal shit for not calling the cops when they witnessed -- wtf was it, someone shooting someone else? something like that. You're the lawyer, YOU go look it up :)

      I'd wonder about this Frex fellow too, except his full name is For Example :)

      [reads Palsgraf] Argh. My brain hurts. I'm gonna sue you for negligent infliction of pain and suffering. [g]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    20. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. aren't there some "if you see X and can help, you must help" laws on some books? I vaguely recall some case where someone got in legal shit for not calling the cops when they witnessed -- wtf was it, someone shooting someone else? something like that. You're the lawyer, YOU go look it up :)

      "No duty to rescue" is probably the #1 issue that pisses off first-year law students. By the time you're a third year you wouldn't care. :) yes, there are a couple of laws (NH? VT?), but they carry minimal penalties and I think are rarely enforced. Fortunately, few people act like this, and in any event all have to be careful they didn't do something to bring about the predicament. Oh, and to be complete, you do have to rescue someone you have a special duty to, like your child or prisoner or whatever.

      I'd wonder about this Frex fellow too, except his full name is For Example :)

      Well, then I'd be even more afraid of him.

      [reads Palsgraf] Argh. My brain hurts. I'm gonna sue you for negligent infliction of pain and suffering.

      No, you mean intentional infliction of emotional distress, and your claim is a nonstarter, else hundreds of thousands of law students would be suing their instructors. You're going to need some work....

    21. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Likely by 3rd year you don't care, because if you did, you'd have to rescue all those first year vict-- er, students ... waitaminnut, doesn't that fall under my claim against you? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    22. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Address all correspondence and service of process to:

      Douwe, Cheatum, & Howe
      123 Gotohell Plaza
      Gary, Indiana 66666

      Include your name, address, and $1000.

    23. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Fraud! Everyone knows Gary IN is in the 46nnn zipcode block!! :)

      (...the amazingly obscure things my brain can sometimes remember on short notice...)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    24. Re:You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      If you really were smart you'd have known that 66666 is an invalid ZIP. See usps.gov. :P

      When I lived in Chicago I learned the nickname for Scary, Indiana, which i believe led the state and even Chicago in murders.

  24. Where does it end? by NeoMoose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's almost as bad as taking on the maufacturer's of the CD-R's themselves. It's a waste of resources.

  25. alternately by martyn+s · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    x=.999999999...
    10x=9.99999999...

    10x - x = 9.99999999 - .999999999 = 9
    9x = 9
    x = 1

    1. Re:alternately by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      you can't do add/subtract operations on a repeating decimal like that, otherwise you get the (wrong) answer that you did.

    2. Re:alternately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're learning.

    3. Re:alternately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But .999999... does equal 1.

      So what?

    4. Re:alternately by Xtifr · · Score: 1
      Since I've got karma to burn...

      NFNNMIDATA writes: you can't do add/subtract operations on a repeating decimal like that

      Yes, you can. But if you don't want to, there are other ways to prove the case that don't involve addition or subtraction:

      .111111... = 1/9
      9 * .111111... = .999999...
      9 * 1/9 = 9/9 = 1
      1 = .999999...

      This is not some fancy mathematical trick, like proving that 1 = 0 by dividing by zero. This is a simple mathematical fact.

    5. Re:alternately by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Why not? I understand that you cannot subtract infinity from infinity, but an infinite repeating decimal? Sure, you absolutely can subtract infinitely repeating decimals. .333333333... - .333333333 = 0 whether you say so or not.

    6. Re:alternately by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      What i'm saying is that .1111... can only be accurately operated on as the ratio 1/9. Otherwise you must end your decimal string somewhere. When you say .1111... you are in fact referring to 1/9, are you not?

      If you can do it your way, you need to show that 9*.1111... = .9999... without using the ratio. It should take you an infinite amount of time to do.

    7. Re:alternately by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      It should take you an infinite amount of time to do.

      Nope, because all the digits are the same, so they all have the same properties. All I have to do is show that the digits are all the same (they're all '1' in this case), and that the transform works on any one of them (which it does), and I'm done. It's called inductive reasoning, and it's a standard (and indispensible) part of any mathematician's toolkit.

      It gets trickier when you start to deal with irrationals, but there's interesting things that can be done there too. I highly recommend that you read Cantor on transfinites before engaging in this sort of debate again.

    8. Re:alternately by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      How about this. 3/4 is .75 as a decimal. AKA 75/100. Ignoring the original ratio (1/9) in favor of repeating decimals, a decimal of this fashion can be described by a ratio defined by a limit of this function:

      f(x,n) = n(10^0+10^1+10^2+...10^(x-1))/(10^x)

      where x is the # of decimal places and n is the repeater. .1 = 1/10, .11=11/100, .111=111/1000, etc. Do the limit as x goes to infinity of f(x,n) and you get an infinity divided by infinity situation, which is undefined. Hence, trying to do math on one of these repeating decimal representations is meaningless. They do not define a number.

      On the other hand, some evidence to support the claim that I hadn't seen was this progression:

      1/9=.111...
      2/9=.222...
      3/9=.333...
      4/9=.444. ..
      5/9=.555...
      6/9=.666...
      7/9=.777...
      8/9=.88 8...

      which would tend to support the original argument that 1=9/9=.999..., although only on an intuitive level.

      Anyway, if you assume .999... = 1 using the proofs given thus far, there must also be a decimal ending with infinite 9's for every number N in existence that is also a valid representation of N, because you can use the same math to show it. But that number also has a doppelganger (which would have an infinite #of 9's tacked onto the first infinite # of 9's), and so on, until every number then has infinite representations of itself. Seems pretty crappy but I guess that's the price of infinity.

      This reminds me of the omega point, where parallel lines meet. Everything is possible in the infinity zone...

  26. I can't type that fast but... by pavera · · Score: 5, Informative

    I speak and read spanish rather fluently,
    these were CD-R's
    The government agency APDIF (the association protecting the intellectual property of musical recordings) raided this company,
    the company says its illegal because they aren't doing anything wrong, the APDIF is using statistics similar to those used by the RIAA to substanciate their claims that Mekong is aiding the piracy industry ( leaving out all legal uses of CD-R's including data, and other legal uses), Mekong suspects that the APDIF has bribed government officials, or is in some other way in bed with them, and they are specifically attacking Mekong, the article states that there are at least 50 other CD-R importers none of which have been hassled at all, while Mekong has been interferred with 10 times in the last year.

    1. Re:I can't type that fast but... by pavera · · Score: 4, Informative

      correction, the agency PGR raided the company,
      apparently at the behest of APDIF
      sorry for that.

    2. Re:I can't type that fast but... by Surak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ( leaving out all legal uses of CD-R's including data, and other legal uses)

      I don't know what the laws in Mexico are, but generally speaking if they are anything like the U.S. (and that's likely because I *think* they have signed onto the Berne Convention), then there are far more legal uses for CD-Rs than data, including burning copyrighted music to them.

      Remember that fair use allows me to take my legally purchased copyrighted music CDs, rip them to MP3 files, and then burn them to a "mix" CD. There's nothing illegal about that. Note that fair use does NOT allow me to take those same MP3s and share them with the world via a P2P network, however. (Not that that's stopping anyone. ;)

  27. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(3)(.333..)=1"

    This isn't true.

  28. This is only the beginning by Rolman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm Mexican and while I really feel embarrased this kind of idiocy happens in my country, looking closer it happened because the authorities and legal system are extremely broken and stupid when it comes to understanding the nature of the crime that is being pursued in regards to piracy, and the record companies can abuse the situation.

    Funny, but I think this is the same case in almost ANY country. So, while it happened in Mexico because the system could be abused pretty easily, watch out for the same thing happening in other countries soon enough.

    Before this happened, I had even seen commercials stating in a pretty explicit way some phrases equivalent to: "Piracy is theft". This shows it's not only a fault in our system, but because the record companies have the money and power to push their lame propaganda, laws and the perception of the crime can be shaped fairly easily by pulling the right strings.

    As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to theft, but to copyright infringement. This definition is blurred specifically by the record companies in Mexico so to be able to prompt the Police to take care of things as they command.

    You see, there is a really strong music industry in Mexico, where we have literally hundreds of "artists" that sell their overrated, overpriced crap all over the continent, and predictably, this industry is controlled by the same RIAA companies we love to hate.

    In fact, these events should come as no surprise, because in countries like mine, most people can't afford to pay the equivalent to US$15 for a single disk, priced as if it were an imported item, when it could be cheaper because the price markups don't need to be as high as in other countries, where everything from labor to land costs are more expensive. People DO buy and distribute bootlegs, there ARE criminals around here, but this is not the way to handle the situation. This is just a test of RIAA's power.

    Companies that want to protect their profit margins and revenue sources at the expense of the user... Where do you see this happening next?

    Mark my words, this is going to happen in another country and at a much bigger scale, sooner or later.

    Now, who are the real "capos"?

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
    1. Re:This is only the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First let me note that IANAMBIAATB (I am not a Mexican but I ate at Taco Bell), that said I think this issue is one just as you say but moreso along the lines of corruption and bribery. While IANAMBIAATB I have heard uban legends about getting out of traffic problems in Mexico by paying a 'fine' directly to the officer. Perhaps this is indicative of all Mexicans and as such the Mekong Group might be able to use math skills to calculate the amount they would need to pay the officials to buy their support. I imagine Ms. Rosen has made an offer including a Tijuana Donkey-Show and a Dirty Sanchez so the offer needed to offset those things may be quite large. Perhaps /.'ers would contribute?

    2. Re:This is only the beginning by rehabdoll · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      Piracy is *NOT* theft. If it was, it would be called theft/stealing or whatever. It would not be called piracy.

    3. Re:This is only the beginning by PjotrP · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In some way it's already happening for a couple of years in Holland too. In principle at least because while we do not have raids on the cd-r companies like in mexico the dutch equivalent of the RIAA has made it so that they get a certain percentage of every sold cd-r.

      How is the same in principle? Well the thought behind it is very similar. In both cases the record industry just assumes to know what those empty cd-r's will get used for. The only difference is the choice of action taken in light of that assumption.

      When you think about it the thing happening in Mexico is the more logical one. Because when the first assumption is made the more logical step is to follow up that assumption with legal measures. At least the mexican stand on cd-r's is consistent in the sense that once they view it as an illegal activity they take legal actions... The dutch RIAA on the other hand chose to demand percentages of the profits made on the cd-r's. So people who just buy a 10 pack cd-r's to backup data are also paying the record companies through those percentages. This choice may at first seem logical as well (again once the first assumption is accepted) were it not for the fact that it is inconsistant with the record companies constant fight on piracy. So on the one hand they charge people for burning cd's because there are probably copyrighted mp3's involved but on the other hand they are working to make sure that no copyrighted material even exists unless pressed on their own releases. Its like on the one hand banning guns while on the other hand demanding a percentage for every gun sold.

      So at least in Mexico a wrong assumption leads to an action that can be justified by that assumption while in holland a wrong assumption leads another action which in itself cant be justified by the wrong assumption.

      Ah well, this whole problem will be solved with the new copyprotected discs, wont it? hehe

      --
      PjotrP
    4. Re:This is only the beginning by Roofus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Excuse me sir, but this is Slashdot. I'm going to need you to take your rational viewpoint somewhere else.

    5. Re:This is only the beginning by forkb0y · · Score: 2, Interesting

      thank you for the perspective, it is great to get a view from someone living in Mexico instead of the rest of us just making blind suppositions. I worked there for a while about a decade ago, and can certainly see how a financially powerful group like the RIAA could find 'friends' in the government for long enough to make radis like this. I still remember all the money i had to give the police in Mexico City just to keep them from writing my foreign car a ticket every day ...

    6. Re:This is only the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Piracy is theft". ... piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to theft, but to copyright infringement.

      Good point, they really need to make it clearer to the public:

      • Piracy is murder
      • Piracy is rape
      • Piracy is terrorism
    7. Re:This is only the beginning by malkavian · · Score: 2

      Its like on the one hand banning guns while on the other hand demanding a percentage for every gun sold.
      More like banning guns, yet demanding a percentage on all steel sales, as it can only be used to make guns you know (at least that's what this big pile of cash sitting in front of you says, Senator. And money's never wrong.).

    8. Re:This is only the beginning by rodrigogomez · · Score: 1

      Hi there.

      I'm also a Mexican. And I also feel bad about this things happening in my country.

      I don't know how to stop piracy. I know, and I want it to stop: I'm a software developer, and I really don't want to see my software beign sell by some people for 5 dollars.

      But, it is funny that a CD that you can buy here for 17 dollars (more or less, but that's the average for a new CD) will cost you 7 dollars in Argentina, plus shippment. I have bought 2 CDs the past week, they arrived in 2 days, via DHL, and the total cost was 26 dollars (The shippment was 12 dollars!) Here, I would have paid 35 or 40 dollars.

      I don't know why here, in México, the CDs are so expensive. But, as long as they remain that way, the people will be buying their CDs, for 5 dollars, in the piracy-market.

      The solution isn't to arrest the owners of the companies that sell the virgin CDs. (or the drivers of the truck that transport them, for that case); the solution is more closer to stop the people that copies the originals and sells them. AND (maybe first!) to have prices more logical, real and affordable.

      It is better to have the 50% of something, that having the 100% of nothing, says my father.

      Regards

    9. Re:This is only the beginning by trentfoley · · Score: 2
      I have heard uban legends about getting out of traffic problems in Mexico by paying a 'fine' directly to the officer.

      This is a fact. In the early 1980's, I helped a friend bring his wedding presents from Mexico City to Austin, TX. We were in a pick-up truck with a shell cover on the bed loaded with packages. On the long way out of Mexico city (his family lived in the South of the city) we were stopped by the police. My friend was told to pay a fine for transporting so many packages without a permit -- total bullshit. My friend asked what additional fine he could pay so that the policeman would escort us out of the city (so that we would not be stopped again and have to pay another made-up penalty). After paying the equivalent of $40US, we were escorted to the Northern city limit without any more troubles. I was a bit upset over the ordeal, but I was told by my native friend that this was better than having to deal with the legal system directly.

      So, this is not an urban legend. I experienced it first-hand.

    10. Re:This is only the beginning by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      More like banning guns, yet demanding a percentage on all steel sales, as it can only be used to make guns you know . . .

      Exactly. Where I work, we produce thousands of recorded CD-Rs every year (no audio, mp3s, etc., just digital data). Yet we're taxed on every blank we buy to support the RIAA because we could be doing something illegal. It's like the movie Popeye, where the tax collector wants Robin Williams to pay an "up to no good" tax. If it wasn't so insane, it would be funny.

    11. Re:This is only the beginning by deblau · · Score: 5, Insightful
      As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to theft, but to copyright infringement.

      As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to copyright infringement, but to crime on the high seas. Real piracy carries a life sentence.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    12. Re:This is only the beginning by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      In fact, these events should come as no surprise, because in countries like mine, most people can't afford to pay the equivalent to US$15 for a single disk, priced as if it were an imported item, when it could be cheaper because the price markups don't need to be as high as in other countries, where everything from labor to land costs are more expensive. People DO buy and distribute bootlegs, there ARE criminals around here, but this is not the way to handle the situation. This is just a test of RIAA's power.

      I agree with what you've said here, but let's be honest. You can walk into Pericoapa or Tepito (for the uninitiated, those are two of the biggest open markets in Mexico City that also happen to be the largest sources of pirated crap in the country) with the equivalent of US$100 (about 980 pesos) and come out with what amounts to roughly ten times that in pirated media. We all did it once or twice. In fact, back in the 80s the only way to get a decent Def Leppard tape was to buy it there because our friends at Fonovisa churned out the most repulsive low quality crap imaginable.

      I'm not saying things like these are justified, and you are right insofar as this is not the way to fight piracy. But compared to the US, piracy in Mexico *is* an organized crime, and yes, it's an organized crime because income is very low. The scale is very different so the legal system is doing only what they consider to be the source of the problem - the media. Cut down all the trees, and presto. No more furniture. In the US or Europe that would be stupid, but down there it makes sense (from their POV).

    13. Re:This is only the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Give me all your Britney mp3's or I'll send ya to Davey Jones!

    14. Re:This is only the beginning by quintessent · · Score: 2

      the dutch equivalent of the RIAA has made it so that they get a certain percentage of every sold cd-r.

      This also happens in the U.S.

  29. Let's not jump the gun by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 1
    This raid could have been for a lot of reasons. It might be a misguided attempt to stem CD piracy, but it could also be that someone at the CD company forgot to (or refused) to pay off certain officials of Mexico's notoriously corrupt government. The Mexican recording industry's ties with organized crime should also be considered. The details of the story that I could make out using my sketchy knowledge of Spanish made the whole thing seem suspicious, particularly with this company being singled out among all Mexican CD-R importers.

    I don't see much danger as of yet of this type of incident taking place among the functioning democracies of the developed world, such as those in Europe or North America. I am withholding judgement on this story until futher evidence comes to light.

    1. Re:Let's not jump the gun by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

      >The Mexican recording industry's ties with
      >organized crime should also be considered.

      it was.
      thus the phrase "Mexico's equivalent of the RIAA..." :)

  30. is it possible by alizard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't know the legal system in Mexico, other than that it has a reputation for corruption (rather like the US Congress) or the respective organization. I'm interested in comments from people who actually know the situation down there.

    Is it possible for the company who had its CDRs ripped off to sue the Mexican equivalent of RIAA into oblivion, i.e. to ... outbid the recording industry for justice?

    1. Re:is it possible by Mex · · Score: 0

      It's possible to sue, but it's not possible to win.

      They have too much money, and I doubt the victims would have the money and the will to keep a trial going for years(which they probably will lose). They have the media (those pop stars are darlings of the media), the money and the politicians.

      Mommy, help me get out of here.

    2. Re:is it possible by The+Bungi · · Score: 2
      The Mexican recording industry used to be pretty much independent of the big media multinationals. Grupo Televisa essentially owned every single artist that existed in the country, along with their souls, their bodies and the rights to their music. Televisa was (is) a government cheering posse, with strong ties to the then ruling party (the PRI). So it was pretty much impossible to win a court case against them.

      As the world has changed, so has Mexico. After 70 years, there's another party in power (the PAN), which, if anything, is far less paternalistic but more business friendly (president Vicente Fox used to be an executive in the Mexican arm of Coca-Cola, something unheard of when the PRI was in power). So, even though Televisa's influence has waned to a certain extent, the circumstances have changed and globalization has expanded the role of the big media companies into the country with the blessing of the business-friendly government.

      So, in closing, if you wanted to take anyone to court, you were screwed then and you are screwed today. But for different reasons =)

      In any case, if you think the US legal system is bad, you should try Mexico. All you need is enough money to buy a judge, and you're home free. There is no trial by jury, no grand jury, no peer review, very little appeal recourse and virtually no, erm, justice. Unless you happen to be rich. Pretty much the same as the US, except that in Mexico you don't have to maintain appearances - you just pay up!

  31. Are we hearning the whole story? by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know in Canada, for example, that all CD-Rs are taxed, and part of the money goes to the recording companies. If a Canadian importer was only sending 20% of the CDs that they imported to stores that collected the tax, they would probably be doing something illegal there, so perhaps there is a similar situation in Mexico... i.e. only 20% of the CD-Rs that are sold have the record-tax collected with the sale. If that was the case, then there would certainly be a legal reason to go after these people, if not a moral one.

    (btw, It probably goes without saying, but I think these kinds of laws are ridiculous. In the US taxes are collected on blank tapes, and special CD-Rs that special music-only CD burners can record onto)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's worth noting that to date, the CPCC (Candian Private Copying Collective) has collected over 20 MILLION dollars due to the levy on CD-R media.

      Not a single PENNY has gone to anyone except the CPCC. They havn't given any of it to anyone.

      And since the levy is implemented by the government, you'd expect that we (the public) could have a look at the books... Wrong, the CPCC is more or less a private company, so they don't have to show the public what they're doing behind the scenes.

      What a scam.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not a single PENNY has gone to anyone except the CPCC

      How do you know that if "they don't have to show the public what they're doing behind the scenes".

    3. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It's the same thing in Finland. We have had the CD-R tax for years and our CPCC equivalent (Teosto) is getting more and more aggressive about "defending the artists' rights". Recently they sued taxi drivers union. Why? Because of the radio. Now if the taxi driver wants to keep listening to the radio with a customer in the car, he has to pay a fee to Teosto. Who cares if the radio station has already paid for the broadcasting rights...

      I'm not a taxi driver, but I am getting fed up with Teostos antics. I have been in contact with certain consumer rights lobby groups, lawyers and journalists to see if anything could be done about this madness.

    4. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      I wish I had some mod points for your sig :P

    5. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by gr66nman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out the CPCC site. They clearly indicate on their site that they will be distributing royalties in 2003 and that they have $28 million ready for distribution. The Copyright Board of Canada also states how the money should be distributed.

    6. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait we are talking canadian dollars here right?
      what thats only like $143.86 US right?
      not such a big deal :D

    7. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read thier web site carefully. The levy on blank CDR media is a license to steal copyrighted music.

      Canada rocks!

    8. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      And people in the USA are always going on how moving to Canada would be better than living here.

  32. APDIF? by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that like S/PDIF?

    Sorry, that was a really lame joke.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:APDIF? by CBNobi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Heh. You could've at least made AP stand for autopr0n.

  33. What about the trees? by aiken_d · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, come on, do you realize that fully 20% of the oxygen that trees produce goes to criminals, bums, drug dealers, and pirates? Coincidence? I think not! The trees must be jailed!

    -b

    --
    If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    1. Re:What about the trees? by soybean · · Score: 1

      Oh, yea!? Like the Ents would allow that.

    2. Re:What about the trees? by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Evidently you forget President Reagan's revelation many years ago that trees also cause pollution. Worse, when they are cut down they are used to build substandard homes, ground into paper for inferior publications, and worst of all burned, producing still more pollution.

      To add insult to injury the tree next to our house tried to drop a huge branch on us the other day.

      IMHO the damn things should be banned.

    3. Re:What about the trees? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Funny
      To add insult to injury the tree next to our house tried to drop a huge branch on us the other day.

      Never piss off the trees. Saruman learned that the hard way.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:What about the trees? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Hey! I haven't seen it yet!!!

      Is no one going to mention the Whompin' Willow? Or is that too lowbrow?

  34. just robber baron tactics by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How large has the CD industry become over the past few years? I'd guess it's already larger than the music industry. Just take a look at your local electronics store - I know several that have more shelf space devoted to CD readers, writers, blanks and other equipment than to music CDs.

    So in essence, this is just one industry association trying to do as much damage on another industry as they can. Because they know that sooner or later, it'll all come down to "what is better for the economy" or "who has the larger bottom line".

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  35. Very disturbing indeed by kfg · · Score: 1

    "I searched for "Mekong Group" (kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting there"

    So you can imagine how I feel when every day I have to pass Schenectady Hardware and Electric in light of the Schenectady Massacre.

    All the stores in Richmond Va. named "Richmond this or that" make me shudder and how anybody can actually still visit, let alone live in, the Argonne without getting the screaming willies is beyond me.

    The fact of the matter is that virtually every bit of soil ever visited by human beings is soaked in the blood of humans spilled by other humans.

    If we're going to be sensitive to this fact perhaps it should be to oppose the continuence of this sordid state of affairs.

    Other than that such sensitivity would just mean we have to invent new euphemisims for every place on earth so as not to 'offend' anyone.

    Seems kinda dopey to me.

    KFG

    1. Re:Very disturbing indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh grow up. The difference is that these places in Vietnam became familiar to Americans only because of the war, and then vanished. Only in recent years have relations with Vietnam gradually normalized. So the names for now retain an exotic and somewhat melancholy sound.

      Technically it was the Mekong Delta.

  36. You call that funny? by CBNobi · · Score: 4, Informative

    BabelFish, and other systems based off of the SysTran system use a literal translation algorithm, also called Word-for-Word translation. Thus, it doesn't search for phrases or sentence structure; it's not uncommon to see "su" (the Spanish equivalent of his/her/its) simply translated as "his". And as Spanish would have it, "Ciudad de Mexico" literally translates to "City of Mexico". ("White House" is "Casa Blanca", by the way)

    As for the Mekong group, with a quick search you'd find their website. Note that it's "Grupo Mekong".

    News flash: Not everything is based off of English. Nor does everything get passed on to American sites.

    1. Re:You call that funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that it did correctly transpose "Grupo Mekong."

  37. MODERATORS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent deserves (Funny)... I don't think I've laught this hard all day..

    Tires are the root of all evil :)

  38. Not many people remember .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. that back in the days (50s and 60s), when a lot of pressing plants used the Mafia to deter organised labour, there used to be a grey market kick back to the Mafia in the form of pressed CDs that weren't registered on the books of the record companies.



    -ac
    1. Re:Not many people remember .. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      .. that back in the days (50s and 60s), [...] in the form of pressed CDs

      Eh... what did they use to press CDs back then? Wood?

  39. just cops after bribes, its Mexico by DABANSHEE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whether one is committing a crime or not, (one can even be 100% legit) cops in much of the world will not hesitate to hassle one if they think they can get 'don't hassle me' bribe money.

    This is Mexico it happens all the time. Gez I know someone who was arrested & locked up for reporting the theft of her handbag, she paid a bribe & she was out of there. Only thing was she didn't know how things worked in the 3rd World because it took 2 days of her being locked up before she put 2 & 2 together (just because a cop wants a bribe doesn't mean they'l spell things out for you)

    1. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      Yep, the bribe doesn't have to be much, either. Especially in dollars.

      You can bad mouth the US all you want, but at least the cops are *SUPPOSED* to have a search warrant. The fourth amendment means less each day (a certain former president told his people to "find a way around it"), but the words are still on the paper.

    2. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      My sister's company does business in Spain (in fact a niece to the king of Spain was my sister's office assistant for a while, having been sent out to "learn about the world"). Before anyone from my sister's office was allowed to talk to Spanish officials, their Spanish liaison gave them a crash course in the art of bribery: Even tho offering or accepting a bribe is highly illegal and WILL get you jailed on the spot, bribes are nonetheless expected (indeed, *required*) if you intend to actually get any work done. But no one will up and tell you "now is the time to offer a bribe." The trick is noticing the point in the negotiations where the bribe IS expected, and responding appropriately and generously -- while making damn sure everyone can regard the bribe as a "gift", thus legal.

      The fact is, every system ultimately runs on grease, whether that's preferential business deals, political favours, or outright bribes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by fliplap · · Score: 1

      And let me ask you. What would YOU do, if the government collectively decided to start ignoring that? Or the entire constituion for that matter? The words maybe be on paper, but they're still just words, and its still just paper.

    4. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Mexican exchange student told me first hand, " If you get caught drunk driving, give the cop 50$ and he will let you go."

    5. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      The second amendment is the guarantee of the others.

      Think I am full of it? Read Unintended Consequences. That book is *NOT* about terrorism, it is about true patriots (think founding fathers).

      If they push too hard, they go. Period.

    6. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

      Who knows, maybe the RIAA will start hiring Mexican cops as the start of their secret army of anti Piracy assassins. *Shudders*

    7. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember, they're only patriots to you.

    8. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      Yes, they are.

  40. very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its all very well stopping piracy by stopping cd-r factories, but whats being done about CHUPACABRA?

  41. Unless you saw action in. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    Cambodia or Laos.

    KFG

  42. Re:You forgot something: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory

    7) ???
    8) PROFIT

    Sorry, I had to...

  43. Re:You forgot something: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory

    9) ???
    10) PROFIT

    Sorry, I had to...

  44. Re:You forgot something: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory

    11) ???
    12) PROFIT

    Sorry, I had to...

  45. Re:OT by Terralthra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes it is.


    --
    -Terralthra...
  46. Re:You forgot something: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory

    13) ???
    14) PROFIT

    Sorry, I had to...

  47. What a GREAT IDEA for law enforcement!! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a GREAT IDEA for law enforcement!! See, now they don't have to investigate murders any more, just go and arrest the manufacturers of the bullets! Now every murder can be solved in seconds! Piracy? Arrest the people who run the electric company! After all, they provide the power that runs the computers those pirates use! Or, even better, go and arrest the managers of the FOOD STORES. After all, if they didn't sell food to pirates and criminals, they'd starve to death! OH..and arresting the food managers will have an unexpected bonus...we'll starve terrorists to death at the same time! Does this sound ridiculous? Seems to me that it's exactly what's going on! See, many things can be used for both legal and illegal purposes. Banning them JUST BECAUSE the potential of illegal use exists is purley asanine, yet it's already happening now.....

    1. Re:What a GREAT IDEA for law enforcement!! by finelinebob · · Score: 1

      AH, I see ... "Minority Report", minus the psychics.

      Better start buying music CDs with your plastic, folks -- if you don't buy it from the official sources, you're next up against the Wall.....

      (pssst! anyone know where I can buy a forged credit report showing how much money I sent to Columbia House and BMG?....)

  48. this is the end.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're past the beginning of the end... this is the meat....

    1984 happened in 1953....

    they know it's wrong, they're just desensitizing those among us who are blind enough or naively patriotic enough or sheepish enough to let them do it and get away with it too.

    I'll be in my bunker waiting for the black helicopters and NWO storm troopers.

    Seriously though.... google operation northwood.... scary 5hit.

    I don't believe in God, so I'll just say United we Stand. Peace out

  49. Have a translation by cookd · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Let's hear it for the karma whores! WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP!)

    Ok, another translation by a person who kinda knows Spanish (I do fine in conversation) but I am bound to get a few things wrong where you need to know the culture. Those who know better -- please feel free to correct me. When I'm uncertain, I put the actual literally-translated Spanish word in parentheses after my guess at the best-fit (actual meaning) English word. Here goes nothing:

    UEDO (Special Unit against Organized Crime) detains (roots?) head(?) pirates
    They (the pirates?) say they don't know/don't care about the way that their blank disks are used.

    The UEDO spent 90 days detaining (rooting?) Efrain and Rafael Solis Heredia, owners of the Mekong Group and considered by the music indistry the "heads" of record piracy, since they alone bring into Mexico about 200 of the 400 million blank disks that are imported each year.

    Idelfonso, Solis Heredia, brother of those detained (rooted?), acting as proxy, announced yesterday that the next week he will denounce PGR and the Secretariat... for the "illegal" nature of a December 18th operation where the Solis brothers were detained and 7 million CDR disks were confiscated (secured?).

    "This operation turned into a search, but they had no warrant, with these situations as our basis, we are performing a legal analysis to figure out what kind of charges (demands?) will be brought, in the next week we'll have it." (run-on sentence present in original Spanish, making it hard for me to figure out what he was really trying to say...)

    "They (the PGR?) were requested to release them (the Solis brothers), but the PGR detained (rooted?) them so that they could start their investigations, from that comes our concern because in the style of earlier administrations (Governments?) they are trying to make up some nonexistent crime or plant something to make us guilty of something that was never found," said the lawyer.

    The Solis brothers are (SIC-were?) detained during the previous investigation PGR/UEDO/397/02, since its business, which has branches in 4 parts of the country, sells blank disks to the legal record industry as well as to pirates.

    According to the calculations of the APDIF (Association for the Protection of Recording/Music IP), the legitamate industry (i.e. the record industry) purchases 20 million disks per year, but that is only 10% of the 200 million that the Solis family imports and sells each year. For this reason, they are flagged as the principle instigators of piracy in Mexico.

    Among the accusations he refuted (among the supposed irregularities denounced?), Ildefonso Solis noted that in the December 18th operation, among the 7 million disks confiscated were 2.8 million units that were taken for a second time, since they had already been returned since the merchandise was legal.

    "60% of these disks were produced in Mexico, 20% were disks that had been seized the previous time, and 20% are disks for which we have the necessary invoices and papers, so we can't see any reason why they make these illegal seizures," he said.

    In fact, Mekong's proxy (Idelfonso) presented copies of documents from the Tax Administration Service, in which is recorded the return of 2,852,523 blank CDR disks and 3 CPUs on August 27.

    Solis said that it is not their problem that some of their customers are producers of unauthorized music, and accused the AMPROFON (Mexican Association of Producers of Records and Videos) and the APDIF (Association for the Protection of Record IP) of being behind the "defamations" and operations of the PGR.

    "They claim that these disks can be used for illegal activities, which is something that doesn't really concern us -- we know what we are doing, but we don't know what other industries are doing."

    "We know that behind them (PGR) is the AMPROFON componay, that they (AMPROFON) have turned (taken? I'm guessing the m should really be an rn, in which case "turned" is correct) them against us, as well as APDIF, because they feel it is illegal (they feel illegal?), but we only sell original blank materal, and we sell it to the industry, we don't understand the rationale behind these accusations and defamations against us," he claimed.

    In addition, he asked the PGR for "talk, not repression," since he complained that the federal authorities have only acted against ("grabbed at it") the Mekong company and not against a single one of the 50 other companies -- including international companies -- that are involved with importing and selling CDR disks.

    Between December 19th 2001 and December 18th 2002, there have been 10 operations and 10 visits to 10 branches and warehouses of this company that supposedly supplies half of the pirates in Mexico.

    "We know that we are not the only ones, there are about 50 companies that are involved in importing disks, and among these 50 there are many international ones that have not been bothered and that are involved in the same activities as are we, I won't name names."

    "We want the authorities to talk with us and we want to not have repression, the operations that are being made are totally illegal, we want there to be dialogue, that the authorities explain to us why they are doing these illegal actions," said Solis.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:Have a translation by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      You are more far more perseverent than I.

      I got about 3 paragraphs into that article and was yawning. Whoever wrote it was rather mundane. It read like an monotonous news ticker.

      Good translation though. I've always found reading to be easier than speaking or listening. Then again, I'm used to Castillan and I live in the US and have a hard time understanding Mexicans.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Have a translation by The+Bungi · · Score: 2

      "rooted" == arraigo. A term used in Mexican civil and criminal law that pretty much means detention.

    3. Re:Have a translation by Yokoshima · · Score: 1

      Arraigo is pretty much house arrest, your bound to stay in your house cant leave it ya know...yah

    4. Re:Have a translation by cookd · · Score: 1

      Thanks -- very helpful. (I'm on vacation, so I don't have access to my normal English-Spanish dictionary, which has a large number of "localized" definitions, probably including this one.)

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  50. Ancient shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And how convenient of you to drag up this kind of ancient shit when your country is at war with an enemy like which we have never known before.

    How much did Al Qaeda and Yasser Arafat pay you you liberal scum?

    Yes, dissent is a part of the American way but at critical times like this a real patriot will hold back his criticism and stand in line with the rest of us until the war is over.

    1. Re:Ancient shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are stupid. Also, you are a traitor because you want to stop the flow of discussion.. does the phrase "freedom of speech" ring a bell? It's the basis of all our Nation's law. Freedom of religion was an afterthought.

      go smurf yourself. Republicans are all c****uckers anyway.

      HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!
      Bite me. :)

  51. A difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key difference is that the levy isn't that bad (a few cents per CD) and copying for personal use (i.e. to physically give a copy of a music CD to a friend) is legal. It's a tradeoff.

    1. Re:A difference by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      The key difference is that the levy isn't that bad (a few cents per CD) and copying for personal use (i.e. to physically give a copy of a music CD to a friend) is legal. It's a tradeoff

      When did copying music for friends become legal? I believe you're mistaken.

      One-shot piracy is merely overlooked, because it means you're usually attacking someone who's a customer and who isn't making a significant impact on your bottom line.

    2. Re:A difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is. I'm going to go find the releveant bit of legislation right now and post it when I can. I was just as stunned to realize that this is actually true in Canada (and a damn good thing it is too).

    3. Re:A difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, that was easier than I thought. I wouldn't even have posted my previous comment if I'd realized I could find it that quickly. The relevant link is here. In a nutshell you were right - you cannot legally make copies for your friends, but you can legally make copies for your own private use.

    4. Re:A difference by thedigitalbean · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummm no...

      Read this:

      http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml

      The levy is set to increase on Jan. 2003

      CDRs - 53 cents / disc
      Hard Drives on portable MP3 players - $ 21.00 / GB !!! 21 dollars!

      They are also going to institute levys against removable and non-removable memory cards.

      This is hardly 'a few cents per CD'

    5. Re:A difference by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Hard Drives on portable MP3 players - $ 21.00 / GB !!! 21 dollars!

      Damn! So my iPod would have cost over $1000 (Canadian).
      The worst part is that they probably will tax it based on the marketing Gigabyte, instead of the Real Gigabyte...

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    6. Re:A difference by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Are CD-Rs really taxed 21c CDN?

      Interesting category:
      "CD-Rs and CD-RWs (100 megabytes or more in capacity"

      Are there any of these with less than 100MB capacity? 8cm CDs are around 150MB

      The thing I question about the page is that it appears to not have been updated since late spring, specifically, I see no update since 2002 March 31, the amounts listed are proposed and the page has no indication saying that it has been enacted.

  52. Wow... by russx2 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Grupo Mekong, responsible for 200 of the 400 million virgin CDs imported each year
    If they'll raid a group of that size, imagine what would happen to a group making twice that, say, 400!
    1. Re:Wow... by Enry · · Score: 2

      It would be more, but they only found 1600 1x burners.

  53. How much worse can it get? by Rai · · Score: 2

    How long until the record companies can seize a person's entire bank account just because they hear a song in a taxi? Sounds ridiculous now, but so did stories like this.

  54. murders by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    See, now they don't have to investigate murders any more

    I think you hit on a much bigger point! They don't have to get their hands dirty investigating REAL CRIMES like murder and actual theft(carjackings, burglary, etc.), they get to use unreasonable amounts of time and public resources(the police are a public resource!) investigating copyright infringement on behalf of the extremely wealthy.

    I guess we now know who the government and police force REALLY work for...

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  55. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it's not.

  56. Bring out the guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mexico has no laws, why not just shoot them? I doubt anyone will care, or do anything about it :)

  57. It happened to Pinocchio by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Gez I know someone who was arrested & locked up for reporting the theft of her handbag

    So do you claim that being locked up for reporting something stolen doesn't just happen to little wooden boys in fairy tales?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  58. (Meta) Typing ntilde by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Also, it's español not espanol.

    How did you type that? Slashdot seems to have been configured to disallow use of almost all HTML character entities.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(Meta) Typing ntilde by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Type ñ (at least in windows) by holding the alt key and using the numpad to hit 165, then release alt. is 168, ½ is 171, ¼ is 172, etc.

    2. Re:(Meta) Typing ntilde by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Type ñ (at least in windows) by holding the alt key and using the numpad to hit 165, then release alt.

      Don't you think that's REALLY crappy design? On a laptop without a separate numpad, you have to look up the number for the character you want, press Fn+Num Lock, hold Alt and type 165, release Alt, and then press Fn+Num Lock again to return to typing mode. On an iBook, you press Option+n, n, which is easier to remember because the tilde is roughly n-shaped, and then an n goes under it.

      And what about those characters that don't exist in ISO-8859-1, such as a Euro sign?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:(Meta) Typing ntilde by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Don't you think that's REALLY crappy design? On a laptop without a separate numpad, you have to look up the number for the character you want, press Fn+Num Lock, hold Alt and type 165, release Alt, and then press Fn+Num Lock again to return to typing mode.

      It's easier, in that instance, to use Character Map...double-click the character, copy it from the edit window to the control, and paste it wherever. You probably had to start Character Map anyway to get the character code to type in, unless you memorized it (which you might do if you use certain foreign languages frequently).

      And what about those characters that don't exist in ISO-8859-1, such as a Euro sign?

      Alt-0128 yields (euro). Using a leading zero gets you a different set of characters than if you leave it out...Alt-128 produces Ç (C-cedilla). While Alt-165 produces Ñ (N-tilde), Alt-0165 produces ¥ (yen). Alt-0209 produces Ñ (N-tilde).

      (IIRC, no leading zero gets you characters from the IBM-graphics set, while the leading zero uses ISO-8859-1. Also, I think the distinction between Alt-0xxx and Alt-xxx might be Win32-only, as punching Alt-0165 and Alt-165 into joe on a Linux box both produced ¥ (yen). I've put character names in parentheses in case the characters somehow get mangled. I think that the edit box in Mozilla translates IBM graphics to ISO-8859-1 as you enter them, as the box-drawing characters are all translated to their nearest ASCII equivalents. Alt-206 should produce a double-line intersection, but it shows up as + (plus) instead.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  59. Like Duke Nukem ForNever? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    They clearly indicate on their site that they will be distributing royalties in 2003 and that they have $28 million ready for distribution.

    And 3D Realms's web site still indicates that Duke Nukem Forever will be published soon.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  60. (OT) Repeating decimal means limit by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The repeating-decimal notation ".333..." represents the limit of the sum of 3(10^i) as i increases from 1 without bound. It's straightforward to go from Sum(3(10^i), i=1..Inf) this to 1/3.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  61. Ads with "piracy is theft" by ParnBR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In Brazil, there's something similar to that, but the message is "piracy is a crime". Here, a new CD costs around US$7.50 to US$10.00, but an equivalent pirate CD costs around US$2.85 (at least where I live). These pirate CDs are usually pressed bootlegs, but not always. Considering a single CD costs (in average) 15% of minimum monthly wage in Brazil, I think it's safe to assume CDs are way overpriced here. Sad to see bootleggers AND record companies get rich taking advantage of this situation. And copy-protected CDs are cropping up here too. :(

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  62. Fair use . . . according to the RIAA? by angle_slam · · Score: 4, Informative
    Remember that fair use allows me to take my legally purchased copyrighted music CDs, rip them to MP3 files, and then burn them to a "mix" CD. There's nothing illegal about that.

    Well, that is your position anyway. If you look at the Audio Home Recording Act ("AHRA"), you'll see that there is an immunity to making some types of recordings. One cannot be prosecuted for making those types of recordings. However, the RIAA's position (as seen here) is that CD-R drives on computers are not covered by the Audio Home Recording Act:

    Multipurpose devices, such as a general computer or a CD-ROM drive, are not covered by the AHRA. This means that they are not required to pay royalties or incorporate SCMS protections. It also means, however, that neither manufacturers of the devices, nor the consumers who use them, receive immunity from suit for copyright infringement.
    All this may mean, however, is that, instead of looking at the Audio Home Recording Act to see if making a personal copy is legal, one would have to look at the traditional Fair Use factors. It is very arguable that the AHRA was originally intended to prevent perfect digital copies of CDs, and an MP3 is not a perfect digital copy. In fact, one may argue that distributing MP3s is a "noncommercial use," as those who place music on Kazaa are not seeking renumeration, so are thus within the spirit (though possibly not within the letter) of the AHRA.
    1. Re:Fair use . . . according to the RIAA? by Surak · · Score: 2
      However, the RIAA's position (as seen here [riaa.org]) is that CD-R drives on computers are not covered by the Audio Home Recording Act.

      Multipurpose devices, such as a general computer or a CD-ROM drive, are not covered by the AHRA. This means that they are not required to pay royalties or incorporate SCMS protections. It also means, however, that neither manufacturers of the devices, nor the consumers who use them, receive immunity from suit for copyright infringement.


      What, precisely, constitutes a "general computer"? Is a PVR (such as Tivo) a "general computer"? Before you answer that, remember that Tivo and many other PVRs use Linux [an operating system written for general purpose computers] as their base OS. What about a PDA? Or an MP3 playback/recording device? Or a Sony Minidisc Recorder? These things are certainly based on general purpose computing devices.

      My point is that computers and consumer electronics are converging. This is a result of the natural evolution of the technology. Certainly the AHRA took into account advances in such technology?

      Also, what constitutes a perfect digital copy? I think even a raw bit-by-bit copy of a CD to a CD-R can result in a slight degradation of quality (loss of data) due to differences in the media between commercial CDs and CD-Rs.

      I don't think many on Slashdot would argue with me if I said I thought the RIAA was full of shit.

    2. Re:Fair use . . . according to the RIAA? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      What, precisely, constitutes a "general computer"? Is a PVR (such as Tivo) a "general computer"? Before you answer that, remember that Tivo and many other PVRs use Linux [an operating system written for general purpose computers] as their base OS. What about a PDA? Or an MP3 playback/recording device? Or a Sony Minidisc Recorder? These things are certainly based on general purpose computing devices.

      My point is that computers and consumer electronics are converging. This is a result of the natural evolution of the technology. Certainly the AHRA took into account advances in such technology?

      No, the AHRA didn't take any advances into account. The AHRA definition of "digital audio recording device" is this:

      A ''digital audio recording device'' is any machine or device of a type commonly distributed to individuals for use by individuals, whether or not included with or as part of some other machine or device, the digital recording function of which is designed or marketed for the primary purpose of, and that is capable of, making a digital audio copied recording for private use . . .
      Under that definition, an iPod or MD player/recorder probably could fall under the definition of digital audio recording device. But that would mean paying royalties for all MDs. If extended to CD-Rs, you would be immune from prosecution, but would pay royalties for blank CD-Rs (like the "music CD-Rs" currently available.

      IIRC, the AHRA was enacted specifically for because of DAT. Consumer DAT machines have SCMS, which prevents making a copy of a copy. You can make any number of copies from an original, but you can't make direct digital copies of a copy. However, IIRC, you could make an "analog" copy of a DAT by running the copy through the D/A converters and back through the A/D converters. Thereafter, you could make unlimited copies of the "analog" copy. I think it is arguable that MP3 encoding is equivalent to going through an extra layer of D/A and A/D conversions in that the copy is not "exact" but is probably "good enough" for most.

  63. Oh for the love of rice... by Yokoshima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been a long time reader of /. and even sometimes dabble in to see the replies of people, being a Mexican my attention was caught by this article, and more so by the replies. I'll try and give some more insight and correct some things. 1)We can't say "It happened in Mexico" because there are three different places called Mexico, one is the country, another is the state and a third one is the city, so Ciudad de Mexico is quite right. 2)Raided makes me think of swat teams jumping in from windows totting guns and helicopters flying overhead etc...(yes its your dammed media that makes me think this) an "arraigo" is actually just house arrest you...arraigo dosnt translate to raid TYVM. 3)A "Orden de cateo" is pretty much a search warrant which the officials didn't have while they searched through Grupo Mekong's stuff. It wasn't just the PGR that was in on this FYI also. 4)Mekong is under this supposedly because most of what they sell they sell to people that use this CDRs to burn copies of original stuff and sell them, so this compares as if in the U.S. Wal-Mart is investigated for selling the guns that the deppressed teen used to blast the heads off his classmates (what can I say I'm still fascinated by that stuff). 5)Mekong can account for every last piece of their merchandise with the required paperwork, the Officials cant account even for a search warrant. 6)Mekong believes the AMPROFON and APDIF (yes pretty much the mexican RIAA) is behind this, the same way it is in other countries. 7)Yes alot of mexican cops are looking for a bribe, they have a shitty salary and they dont ask for much 20-50 pesos (2 to 5 dollars) and theyll leave ya be, but it ain't everywhere and lets not compare Mexico's Police Force with the U.S. we ain't the racists ones, so there. 8)We're not a third world country you .... were a developing 2nd world country. 9)I know I had more but I just forgot. Puh-lease don't make like Mexico is a shitty country, every country is shitty and we can debate upon that any freakin day of the week, and twice on sunday.

    1. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by fliplap · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      yes, but you've got smelly dirty mexicans. And thats all over your country. Granted, we've got over fed, fat, smelly, white, dumb and rude americans here. Hmmm, I'm starting to wonder which is worse. Well, I can honestly tell you, if I ever needed to flee this country, you'd be like, 4th or 5th on my list of places to hide.

    2. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my@life# ./gf |touch|finger|mount|fsck|watch her
      her@life$ ./men|more
      Segmentation fault: Whore dumped


      Perhaps you've learned a lesson here.

      1) fuck the stupid bitches, do it like you are Rocco
      2) reserve your emotions for those that deserve it (not the sluts from 1)
      3) find a cute nerd girl who is not 1) and do it right

    3. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by Oliver+Newland · · Score: 0

      Mexico probably doesn't want whiners like you.

      --

      I got a 1600 on the SATs.
    4. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by Yokoshima · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I aint whinning, I'm just correcting your mistakes.

    5. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by Yokoshima · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...should I feal insulted or flattered...?

    6. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by Oliver+Newland · · Score: 0

      You weren't whining. A slashdot bug misadjusted the parent of my comment who was bitching about American citizens (while being a bitching American citizen himself). Sorry for any confusion.

      --

      I got a 1600 on the SATs.
    7. Re:Oh for the love of rice... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      Through lots of experience, I have learnt that 'cute nerd girl' is an oxymoron.

  64. You may already be three parts dead by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I think the point is more like from the preface to one of THE EXECUTIONER series of lone-hero-vs-the-mob adventure novels:

    Quoting some classical author: "Those who fear life are already three parts dead."

    The guy who is The Executioner: "I don't care if they all die. I'll be content to make them three parts dead."

    Point being, the object is to strike such fear into the heart of business that even legit blank media producers will bow to the will of the content moguls, preferably by going away entirely. But, you protest, Sony sells CD blanks too! Yeah, and just wait til ONLY Sony sells CD blanks. At appropriately monopolistic prices.

    While I don't think it could ever come to that (there being too much of the world that the content moguls don't and can't control) I'm sure the notion has crossed certain very small minds. Scaring or annoying legit producers out of business is a first step.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  65. CDs in the 50's? (Plus Royalty contract example) by droopus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. that back in the days (50s and 60s), when a lot of pressing plants used the Mafia to deter organised labour, there used to be a grey market kick back to the Mafia in the form of pressed CDs that weren't registered on the books of the record companies.

    Um, while James Russell (I think) did actually come up with the concept for what would become the CD in 1965, Sony and Philips didn't popularize the format till 1983. So, no CDs were kicked back in the 50's - 60's.

    Also remember that even today, record contracts include at least a 10% "breakage" or "container: allowance off the worldwide gross prior to calculating how many rolls of pennies the artist will get, after recouping all expenses. What they do with that 10% (since CDs don't break in shipment like the shellac records for which the breakage allowance was instituted) is a mystery. Some labels actually skim 25% off the top. No need for CD kickbacks there.

    Yep, 25%. You want to see just how egregious some record contracts are? The following is clipped from an actual label contract presented to the prospective band last week. All identifying brands and names have been removed:

    ROYALTIES

    Company shall accrue to Artist the following royalties for the sale by Company, its licensees or assigns, or long playing Albums derived from the Master Recordings against which all sums paid to Artist herein shall be recouped.

    (a) With respect to records sold up at Company's or its distributor's "top line" price level in the United States, a royalty at the rate of ten percent (10%) computed on the (SRLP) list price less a 25% container deduction.

    (b) With respect to each particular type of record sold in Canada and Japan (including records exported to third parties in Canada and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Eighty Five percent (85%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (c) With respect to each particular type of record sold in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the European Economic Community (including records exported to third parties for such territories and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Sixty Five percent (65%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (d) With respect to each particular type of record sold for any territory throughout world not specifically mentioned in subparagraph 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c) (including records exported to third parties in such territories and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Fifty percent (50%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (e) With respect to records sold at Company's or its distributor's "mid line" price level through normal trade channels, royalties shall be at Seventy Five percent (75%) the rate set forth in subparagraph 6(a).

    (f) With respect to records sold at Company's or its distributor's "budget line" price level through normal trade channels, royalties shall be at Fifty percent (50%) the rate set forth in subparagraph 6(a).

    (g) Sales of any Singles, Extended Play Singles and recordings in the United States which are not long playing Albums shall be paid at the rate of Ten percent (10%) computed on the (SRLP) list price less container deductions and any taxes. Sales outside the United States shall be proportionally reduced according to the formula specified in 6(b), (c) and (d) above.

    (h) With respect to the licensing of the Master Recordings to third parties, including but not limited to usage such as record clubs, compilation records and synchronization usage, royalties shall be at the rate of Fifty percent (50%) of the net amount of any such fees received by Company, its licensees or assigns.

    (i) No royalties whatsoever shall be payable to Artist hereunder with respect to records (i) distributed to any person or entity primarily for purposes of promotion, (ii) sold as "scrap", "overstock" or "surplus", (iii) distributed as "free goods" (limited to no more than 20% or "bonus" records).

    (I'm surprised there isn't a clause about shaking the artist by the ankles on a monthly basis to get his loose change.)

    Beyond that, the more common kickback to organized crime in the music business in the 50's - 60's was cash applied to payola to help the "investments" of organized crime climb the charts.

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
  66. big deal ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    200 Million CDs at 10 cents each(canadian ) is a whimpy 20 million dollars.

  67. soaked in the blood of humans... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2

    The corner of Happy Sunshine Way and Plush Blue Bunny Lane...

    A Day We Can Not Forget

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  68. Re:OT by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

    Perform the operations on limits and it will be true, otherwise your math is bad at the second step, because .3333... does not equal 1/3. At some point (depending on your required level of accuracy) it is a close enough approximation, but the two are not equal mathematically.

  69. Counterproductive by Pentalon · · Score: 1


    Maybe if we can point them at the AOL shipping warehouse, they'll all disappear in a puff of logic.

    Derek

  70. That's not funny, I lost an eye. . . by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    every living relative, and my dog, in that fight.

    Show some sensitivity.

    KFG

  71. Ah, Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home of the drug-lords... the Mexican Army routinely attacks the US Border Patrol to provide protection for the drug runners. Just last week in Arizona a Border Patrol SUV was shot up by a Mexican Army HummVee. The real concern obviously wasn't CD piracy, it was payoffs (or lack thereof) to the Mexican government.

    1. Re:Ah, Mexico by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Funny
      the Mexican Army routinely attacks the US Border Patrol to provide protection for the drug runners. Just last week in Arizona a Border Patrol SUV was shot up by a Mexican Army HummVee

      Oh, yes. One of these days we're going to cross the Rio Grande and kick your capitalist butts.

      We have elite teams of car thiefs that can take the threads and wheels off of a tank in less time than it takes to start the engine, and leave it standing on four cinder blocks. Even if the tank happens to be moving.

      We have crack groups of squatters that can invade and occupy any size territory in less time than it takes you to scream "cucaracha".

      Our drug dealers have more firepower than the 3rd Marine Division. And they dress better, too.

      The only problem right now are our nuclear weapons, since they require a match to activate. But we're working on more advanced technology - Zippo lighters.

      We're going to take back California, Arizona, Texas and New Mexico. And then we'll march up to Chicago to link up with our 2 million-strong sleeper cell there.

      Be afraid, be very afraid.

    2. Re:Ah, Mexico by Vuarnet · · Score: 3, Funny

      We have elite teams of car thiefs that can take the threads and wheels off of a tank in less time than it takes to start the engine, and leave it standing on four cinder blocks. Even if the tank happens to be moving.

      Heh. I've always wanted to see the "missing scenes" from Independence Day where a big mothership hovers over Mexico City, and goes down under millions of beggars, window-cleaners, juggler kids and fire-eaters. And gets robbed of everything that looks shiny or valuable enough, to be sold later in Tepito.

      That is, if said mothership actually finds Mexico City under all that smog...

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  72. Nice Logic by Vardan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next lets raid Bic because they made the lighter that arsonists use, plus the pens that Check Fraud people use. Oh, and winchester and ginzu because they make the bullets and knives murderers use. Oh, and don't forget sharpie, because graffiti "artists" use sharpies all the time.

    Damn, where'd the economy go?

  73. CDs in Mexico, a personal report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a British software developer living in a small town on the Pacific coast two hundred miles north of Acapulco. A good weekly income here is 1000 Pesos (US$100), a professional with a college degreee might make 1500 Pesos (US$150) a week. The local Commerical Mexicana, a WalMart equivalent, charges roughly the same for CDs as in the US, so a single CD is at least 10% of gross weekly income.
    Of course people don't buy their CDs from Commercial Mexicana, they buy them from the smaller music stores, whose stock is almost entirely CD-R-based, and who charge more like 30 Pesos.
    When I first moved here I spent a couple of hours at a restaurant having my brain picked by Juan Carlos, a Mexican "Del-boy" (the dodgy-goods trading hero of "Only Fools and Horses"). He was interested in improving the hard drive capacity of his CD duplicating kit -- the time he had to spend each day ripping master CDs to the burner's hard drive was down-time for the burner, and so being able to hold a larger library of masters on the hard drive would reduce the number of rips he had to do each day to meet that day's orders.
    I don't condone such blatant copyright infringement, but the fact is that the CD-R makers are selling to people who would not spend the equivalent on 'official' discs (when I first moved to the US CDs were half the price I'd been paying in the UK, so I probably tripled or quadrupled the number of CDs I bought, doubling the amount I spent.)
    The ultimate solution for the record companies has two prongs. First, the per capita income of the target market can be raised, but that's out of their hands and is hard to do in an economy that is hampered by some degree of corruption and by import/export tariffs that are high (or worse, indeterminate -- importing goods into Mexico may be legal, but the process is very erratic, which makes it hard to establish a reliable supply-chain). Second, bring the unit price more in line with the disposable income of the target market.

    1. Re:CDs in Mexico, a personal report by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

      uh... so what?

      I'm Mexican and I agree with you. However, even if CD's are expensive that doesn't mean every CD-R is used for Piracy.

      You mentioned "smaller music stores, whose stock is almost entirely CD-R-based". There are not such stores here*. If there were, then they are the pirates and they are the ones whose stock should be confiscated.

      *I'm not saying pirated music CD's are not sold in México, only that they are not on stores. They are sold on the streets, on the subway and among friends, not on a store.

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    2. Re:CDs in Mexico, a personal report by Ondo · · Score: 2

      Second, bring the unit price more in line with the disposable income of the target market.

      Isn't this the kind of thing they want region-locked discs for? If they did this now, wouldn't people start importing cheap CDs from Mexico?

    3. Re:CDs in Mexico, a personal report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Which might force them to start charging something closer to the production costs, which they *obviously* can't do.

    4. Re:CDs in Mexico, a personal report by tnmc · · Score: 1

      The ultimate solution for the record companies has two prongs...Second, bring the unit price more in line with the disposable income of the target market.

      Yeah, but they can't do this or they'll be guilty of price fixing, something the DVD industry is coming to terms with now that some brave governments have started tackling the movie industry's "region-coding" scam.../T

  74. OS Vendor next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad nobody has the cajones to go after that giant software vendor whose operating system facilitates and thus makes all this piracy so easy to do.

  75. your brain is full of Ancient shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yes, dissent is a part of the American way but at critical times like this a real patriot will hold back his criticism and stand in line with the rest of us until the war is over"

    And rightly so. I, a true patriot, will hold back my criticism and stand in line when the storm troopers round up your family, force them to dig their own mass grave, and machine-gun you into it. God forbid that citizens of a democracy voice their beliefs or opinions.

  76. Nope its not by XSforMe · · Score: 1

    This is not just a crooked cop, this is an entire federal agency harrasing an legit CDR distributor. Bribes are no longer of concern here, given this has hit the public opinion.

    At least read the article before jumping into conclusions.

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  77. nope, it's retarded goons who cause the problems by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NOPE a real patriot is both intelligent and a student of history, past and reasonably current. A real patriot is able to recognize patterns of deceit and apply them to current events. A real patriot learns from his own and other country's past actions and learns to not keep making the same mistakes over and over and over again. A real patriot can look at a scam, see it for a scam, recognize scams from the past, see where the junta has used scams in the past, and is brave and smart enough to say NO, NEVER AGAIN! A real patriot isn't hungup on political parties and rhetoric, a real patriot is not a member of some fanboy cult over some "leader" or "political party" and stays blind to their misdeeds in the past, a real patriot LOOKS at what individuals do as compared to what they say, and is able to figure out reality rather than have it dictated to them. A real patriot doesn't use the "nuhremberg defense" to excuse illegal actions. A real patriot has the courage to NOT follow illegal orders and to speak out when they see criminality in their ranks and in their superiors actions in the government.

    The world has tried the lock step goose stepping methods, it doesn't work, it's heinous and criminal. Real patriots have the courage to actually follow their oaths, and not just BLINDLY follow orders. A real patriot will do these things, false patriots full of bravado and lacking intelligence will follow the old ways that lead to "sieg heil" actions.

    Learn from history or be destined to repeat it, you have a binary choice there.

  78. More "What's next?" by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    Fine the gasoline companies for enabling.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  79. I can see two sides to this one... by GabrielF · · Score: 1
    There's a difference between using a CD-R to back up your personal data (or software you own) and making 100,000 VCD's of harry potter and selling them on the streets before the movie is released. This would be like going after the companies that sell the parts to fake rolex watches and know that their parts are being used illicitly. If the Mexican gov. and RIAA is legitimately going after companies down there that are big pirates, than thats understandable.

    BUT, its hard to be sympathetic to an industry that gauges artists like the RIAA. Plus, charging $15 for a CD in the US is one thing, in a developing country like Mexico its practically encouraging piracy.

  80. Re:OT by Terralthra · · Score: 1

    So, 3 times 1/3 doesn't equal 1?

    How exactly does that work?


    --
    -Terralthra...
  81. Re:OT by Terralthra · · Score: 1

    The math is only bad if you don't approximate. lim(0.3333...) as 0.333... approaches 0.333... means nothing. If you mean that 0.333... approaches 1/3rd as decimal digits approach infinite, well, that's what the ... means. There are infinite 3s after the decimal point.

    --
    -Terralthra...
  82. Lets raid Wal-mart by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Hell, just use the new fingerprinting payment system, and track down all *buyers* of cdR media, they HAVE to be pirating ... right?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  83. Mexican Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, sadly, Mexican law follows Napoleonic code, not English common law. Unlike English common law, which the U.S. uses, the Napoleonic code basically states that you are guilty until proven innocent. So if a government agency comes after you at the behest of the industry, you are going to get the shaft unless you can account for what you've done. Which, unfortunately for Grupo Mekong, they have apparently not done, and since they have no evidence proving their innocence, they're screwed.

  84. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's called infinity, you cannot define 1/3 in decimals so it will never work.

  85. Re:OT by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

    you cannot do math on a "...", you must use the limit or you are approximating. it's like doing a calc on infinity, it's not doable. like if you were diving infinity by infinity, there is no result possible. similarly, doing a calc using the repeating decimal won't yield a result because there is no end to the string of numbers to deal with. you can't say there's the same infinite amount of digits afer the decimal in .3333... and .9999..., because infinity is not a fixed amount. you must use limits or fractions in these situations.

  86. Wrong again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1-0.9999... = 0.000...001

    0.9999...+0.000...001 = 1.000...000999.... != 1

    Your answer is incorrect. Try again ;)

  87. Re: So in other words by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

    So in other words, unless the artist is payola'd into superstardom, they get about 2.25% to 6.75% of the CD's price as a royalty for the. Thats about 40 to 121 pennies per CD, depending to who the CD is sold to on an $18 CD. Then the artists have to pay for all the other shit like promotions, management, agent, studio time, merchandice, etc.

    What a complete and utter load of Bullshit.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  88. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His(her) maths are perfects. Not the yours. 1/3 is 0,(set here an infinite number o 3). Nothing about limits. This problem can be found in almost any discrete maths book. It's a classic. :)

  89. What do you expect in a corrupt 3rd world country? by leereyno · · Score: 2

    Mexico is not the poorest or the most corrupt nation on earth, but its certainly in the running.

    Mexico is in dire need of cultural reform. If its people had a stronger work ethic and a little bit of back-bone the country would be prosperous. The bullshit that is engrained into their culture is what is keeping it in poverty. Bigots will try to tell you that their situation is caused by some sort of racial or genetic inferiority. The truth is that they are blessed with as much innate ability as any other race or ethic group. If they would get their shit together and work to better their situation they would surely suceed. After all, they've noplace to go but up.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  90. Re:(OT) why do you complicate your life that way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.333... represents 1/3 first of all...

  91. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sould learn a bit more about rational, irrational and real numbers. 1/3 has a decimal form, as every rational number...

  92. Re:(OT) why do you complicate your life that way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.333... represents 1/3 first of all...

    Yes it does to somebody experienced in such arithmetic, but everybody should see the proof at least once in his or her life.

  93. Re:OT by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    you cannot do math on a "...", you must use the limit or you are approximating.

    That's not true. Read Cantor.

  94. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm scared shitless. I've heard the same sentiments too many times from too many Mexicans for it to be a bad joke.

  95. Re:Yoda by Google by Lucius+Sour · · Score: 1

    I particularly like the phrase-
    "Idelfonso Soli's Heredia, brother of the rooted ones and empowered of Mekong, announced yesterday that the next week will interpose denunciations against PGR and the Secretariat of Property"
    This sounds like something written by Edgar Rice Boroughs.
    I hate to think what interrogation methods the police were using here...
    "To them they gave a shelter them so that they loosen them, but the PGR rooted them to initiate their investigations"
    Yuck! Maybe our local Plod aren't so bad!

    --

    Hands up everyone who refuses to obey orders.

  96. "Fair use" is a US legal issue by billstewart · · Score: 2

    The "Fair Use" concept in copyright law is an issue of US law, arising out of US court decisions, not something we acquired with the Berne Convention. I don't know how Mexico does copyright law. But data is certainly the obvious one to talk about, because recording your data on your CD-Writer is obviously a legal reason to have blank CDs.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  97. Janis Ian - one solution and a test by midgley · · Score: 1

    In her article at http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.h tml the singer and song-writer Janis Ian discussed several aspects of this situation.

  98. Here's another one.... by argux · · Score: 1

    Here in Mexico, they've been bombing us with an ad telling us how bad piracy is and how much harm we're making to the poor little multizillionaires like Billy, or the dinosaurs that own the record companies and all the parasites that live from them. But so far this is another stupid complaining post, doesn't it?

    Well, in this ad, the (really strong, national-security-in-risk) voice tells us that piracy is a serious Federal _Crime_ and it is punished by jail without bail.

    One might think "they compare someone who copies his friend's Britney Spears' new album to rapists, kidnappers and murderers", right?
    Wrong! because in our beautiful and beloved Mexico, Rape and Kidnap are not serious crimes (which means a rapist can be bailed out and the next day attack again), but piracy is.

    Oh, and that includes software piracy.

    How do you like that?

  99. Re:OT by Terralthra · · Score: 1

    1/3rd in decimal is 0.333...

    -Terralthra

    --
    -Terralthra...
  100. Lots of Asian companies in Mexico... by crazyhorse44 · · Score: 1

    Especially in the City of Mexico (Perfect Translation of "Cuidad de Mexico"). Mainly Koreans in the manufacturing industry and maily Japanese in the salt and mining interests. Mekong is most likely owned by Asian investors doing business in Mexico to take advantage of Mexico's NAFTA trade priviledges.

    --
    . SLASHDOT: Home of the vicious nerd.
  101. CDR's useable by computer users by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    subject says it all

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  102. APDIF and BSA... by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    ...have been very active this year. But the raid was done by PGR (Procuraduría General de la República), the equivalent (by function anyway, not by skill) of the american FBI. Since justice procurement get's every year a smaller budget than the pollitical parties(public funding almost equal to the goverment's education budget for next year), executive branch and Congress, it's not hard to buy your very own judge down Rio Grande :-(

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  103. Guilt by potental by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    People to often go on the strawman argument of "possable = true"
    It's possable for a CDr maker to knowingly supply pirates that dosen't make it true.
    And if a company dose suspect a costummer is a pirate do they have a responsability to take action?
    Ethicly yes legally I'd hope not.

    It's just to hard to legally establish suspicion. The retailler may suspect a person is a pirate for having a backwards hat or he may not know the slogon on the kids t shirt "Gotta rip em all RIAA." is a pirates slogen.
    It's would put everyone in a bad position.

    In a similar issue.
    During the medical pot debate in california a talk show host held a mini debate between a narcotics officer and a legalisation advocate.
    During the debate the narcotics officer flat out admitted he belived he should be able to search the homes of anyone who was prolegalisation becouse anyone for legalisation MUST be a drug addict.

    There are occasions when people are accused of being digital criminals based on the os they use.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  104. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you do 10x, you get one less 9. E.g. x=.999, 10x=9.99. If you say the string of 9s is infinite, well, then doesn't all this amount to proving that 1-epsilon approaches 1 as epsilon approaches 0 ?

  105. The system scales well by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Whether a local traffic cop or a whole federal govt dept the system of encouraging the solicitation of 'don't hassle me' money scales well.

    The system has been perfected through many hundreds of years of trial 'n error.

  106. Re: So in other words by gthyni · · Score: 1

    > Thats about 40 to 121 pennies per CD,
    > depending to who the CD is sold to on an $18 CD

    But "The Company" does it sell record to
    consumers, so it that percent of the price
    long before it reaches the rack at your local store,
    as I understands it.

  107. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Equation Proofs you!!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mc = e!

    2. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay russian jokes laugh at sperm bank?

  108. Re:OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Limits in infinity? If I ever meet you I'm going to kick your Ass.

  109. FUCK SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO THE FUCK IS STILL LAUGHING AT THESE GAY RUSSIAN JOKES? your ass is a sperm bank for the right bling bling dick muncher.

  110. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Speaking as someone who has delved into the intricacies of PL/I, I am sure
    that only Real Men could have written such a machine-hogging, cycle-grabbing,
    all-encompassing monster. Allocate an array and free the middle third?
    Sure! Why not? Multiply a character string times a bit string and assign the
    result to a float decimal? Go ahead! Free a controlled variable procedure
    parameter and reallocate it before passing it back? Overlay three different
    types of variable on the same memory location? Anything you say! Write a
    recursive macro? Well, no, but Real Men use rescan. How could a language
    so obviously designed and written by Real Men not be intended for Real Man use?

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...