Slashdot Mirror


Friendly Plastic Pop Can Nearly Ready for Market

drfishy writes "BevNET has the story of Toledo, OH based Owens-Illinois and their new pop can. The can is made of a "fancy" new clear plastic with a traditional aluminum top and should be in stores sometime this year. Consumers are supposed to like it because of the "cool" factor, manufacturers will like it because they can use the same equipment to fill and package them, beverage companies like it because consumers and manufacturers will, and advertising agencies love it because they can get rich making all new commercials to convince people it really is cool. Seriously though, I like the idea, enough to submit a story about it anyway..."

114 comments

  1. Pop can? by Evro · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hell is pop? I think you mean soda, or maybe coke, but certainly not pop.

    Obligatory link: http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~almccon/pop_soda/

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Pop can? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      So what part of which country are you from?

    2. Re:Pop can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would you call something that isn't Coca-Cola a coke? Those wacky Southerners.

      You also left out "tonic" and "soft drink".

    3. Re:Pop can? by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 1

      Soda?

      My word, do some people actually drink sodium oxide?!

      --
      I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
    4. Re:Pop can? by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      You bake with soda, you drink pop. Coke is a brand of pop, like Pepsi is also a brand of pop.

    5. Re:Pop can? by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      It's a Michigan thing... ever had Vernors?

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    6. Re:Pop can? by Evro · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Nice try, but "pop" goes the weasel. You drink soda and/or coke. Pepsi is neither soda, pop, nor coke, but more along the line of "crap."

      --
      rooooar
    7. Re:Pop can? by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      I'll give you the pepsi being crap and the weasel going pop, but soda is still a white powder that makes my fridge smell nicer and coke is the red cans in the fridge from which I drink pop.

    8. Re:Pop can? by Jahf · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know, the parent poll is as close to a troll as I am willing to reply to :)

      I've lived in enough areas in the US that I've been around most variations. It seems to break down like this:

      West: soda or pop
      Midwest: pop
      East: soda or soda-pop
      NorEast: soda-pop
      South: Coke or "fountain drink"
      Deep South: Coke (even if it's clear or fruit colored)

      I grew up with "pop", moved to where it was "coke", and then back to where it's "soda" or "pop". I generally call it soda or better yet, use a brand name, as soda seems to be understood everywhere. I definitely have had people not understand when I used "pop" before.

      The point? Not much ... except this is how culture develops ... and telling someone they are wrong (worse, that only they are wrong and other variations are ok) is ... well ... a troll :)

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    9. Re:Pop can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "derrr, no-bawdy calls it that!"

    10. Re:Pop can? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      from dictionary.com... note: I am originally from the southeast USA, where I've heard any soft drink generally called 'coke.' (Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta, GA) This definition does note include 'coke.' I now live in the northwest USA and call it 'pop' like everyone else. soft drink n. In both senses also called soda pop, also called regionally cold drink, drink, pop, soda, soda water, tonic. 1. A nonalcoholic, flavored, carbonated beverage, usually commercially prepared and sold in bottles or cans. 2. A serving of this beverage. See Regional Note at tonic. Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    11. Re:Pop can? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      He could be from New Jersey. We always called it coke or soda.

      Never heard of "pop" until I met some people from Chicago. They thought "soda" was weird.

    12. Re:Pop can? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a pop-top can...

    13. Re:Pop can? by !splut · · Score: 2

      Having grown up in New England, and having lived in upstate New York, I can say that where I come from we decidedly do not call carbonated beverages "soda-pop." It's usually "soda," or "soft drink" if one is trying to sound more like a restaurant.

      "Pop" calls to mind images of popsicles, blow pops, and someone's dad.

      -ks

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    14. Re:Pop can? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      I also live in Upstate New York (near Rochester), and I've usually heard it called "pop", or by its actual brand name.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  2. Red Dye #3 by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great! Another reason to add more and more garish artifical colors to my sugar water.

    Gimme some more o' dat green "Romulan Ale"!

    1. Re:Red Dye #3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme some more o' dat green "Romulan Ale"!

      Uh, Romulan Ale is blue.

      (posted anonymously so nobody will know I'm a Trekkie)

    2. Re:Red Dye #3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romulan Ale is BLUE :)

  3. I am from the Toledo area, history on Owens. by heldlikesound · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They declared bankrupcy after a huge loss in a class-action asbestos lawsuit. Then they went on to simply not pay many small design firms they owed money to. Pretty much puta few of them out of business. It was right around Christmas time too.

    Anyone think they'll pay these firms pay after plastic pop cans become all the rage? Yeah, me neither...

    --


    Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
    1. Re:I am from the Toledo area, history on Owens. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Don't blame them. Blame the people who filed the arguably frivolous asbestos lawsuit.

    2. Re:I am from the Toledo area, history on Owens. by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're thinking of Owens-Corning.

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
  4. Define new? by Trak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This can may be new to the market, but it's not a new design. I held a prototype of this exact can (plastic body, aluminum top) while visiting a friend that worked at a 7UP plant back in the early 1980s, twenty years ago. The can was clear green plastic with the 7UP paint job. It was empty, but sealed.

    1. Re:Define new? by arb · · Score: 2

      And I recall in the mid-80s when "clear cola" was launched, there were several different brands of soft drink available in Australia in similar, clear plastic "cans". They were kinda cool...

    2. Re:Define new? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      new clear plastic with a traditional aluminum top New? I was wondering about traditional. My grandparents say the traditional beverage top in the Olde Country is a flip lid or else just foam and flies.

  5. but! by DonFinch · · Score: 4, Funny

    how do you crush it on your forhead? A plasticy plunk is nowhere near as manishly satifying as the savory crash and pang of sweet, metallic destruction...

    --
    -- Insert wisdom here:
    1. Re:but! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A plasticy plunk is nowhere near as manishly satifying as the savory crash and pang of sweet, metallic destruction...

      Sure, but it's far better than the drunken screams of pain I hear when I try it.

    2. Re:but! by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Manly?
      Uh, youngster... Crushing a can on your forehead, or with your fingertips, got its reputation as an amusing feat thirty years ago when the beverage cans were steel.

      I'll be impressed if you can crush it hard enough to melt it.
      But only impressed in a physics way, not a physical way.

  6. and how? by lowtekneq · · Score: 1

    So how do i recycle this can? Do i put it in the plastics or aluminium bin? By the way, where i live its not "coke" and not pop (doesn't matter if its sprite, dr pepper, or coca cola)

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
    1. Re:and how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycling is for earth pussies. Just throw it in the trash like a real man, you fag.

    2. Re:and how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll be singing a different tune when this additude really starts fucking up the planet.

    3. Re:and how? by www.whitehouse.org · · Score: 1

      Fuck your planet, you hippie freak! If I thought I'd be alive to see the worst consequences of our collective actions, I might give a fuck. But Dictator for Life Bush is gonna bomb the world to all fuck and back, so why care?

      --
      Mod me down and I shall become more trollish than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:and how? by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By the way, where i live its not "coke" and not pop (doesn't matter if its sprite, dr pepper, or coca cola)

      Where exactly is this? I've always wondered. You see, I've lived in Atlanta, the home of Coca-Cola, for six years, and I've never seen anyone call any non-cola beverage a Coke. I've seen Pepsi, RC, and hundreds of knock-off store brand colas called Coke, but I've never heard a Sprite, a Dr. Pepper, or anything else called a Coke.

      Personally, I think the whole "everything's a Coke" bit is an urban legend.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:and how? by lowtekneq · · Score: 1

      come to mobile alabama

      --
      Carpe meam simiam!
  7. How recyclable is it? by DaveOnNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do the recycling folks like it? What's the number in the little triangle? I suppose they'll have to separate the top from the body to recycle it at all. Gotta love that!

    --
    Rank comments and posts against each other at We-Rank.com
    1. Re:How recyclable is it? by Jahf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was about to post the same issue ... with my recycler, I have to separate plastics and aluminum before taking them to the drop off.

      Anyone know which is more environmentally sound to recycle: plastic or aluminum? I would have guessed the aluminum requires less energy and releases fewer gasses than plastic, but I'm not sure.

      If it's a matter of making the can cheaper to manufacture but more expensive to recycle, sorry, but I would rather the manufacturer pay for it than my local co-op recycler.

      If there is no downside to the recycling (and separation is still an issue) then it's a neat concept, but I just feel like aluminum is the more ecologically sound method right now. I would love to be proved wrong.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    2. Re:How recyclable is it? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AFAIK, "Multi-layer injection molded" plastic is not really recyclable at all. Maybe they can melt it down and use it for plastic packing bubbles or something where the properties of the plastic don't matter much. But when you take a piece of "Multi-layer injection molded" plastic and melt it down the layers all melt together like a soup, their different properties mingling together into a plastic "grunge" that isn't usable for much. There is no way to seperate the layers and end up with anything like what you started with, i.e, make another can out of them.

      That is, this product is FAR less recyclable than aluminum cans.

      As far as I know that is, I'm no expert.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    3. Re:How recyclable is it? by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 2

      In my area, aluminum cans are recyclable. Plastic containers are only accepted if they have necks (don't ask me why). So these cottles or bans (to coin two words) are not recyclable here.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    4. Re:How recyclable is it? by gaj · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I was all set to ask the "how will it recycle" question as well. Where I live, we seperate plastics, paper, glass and cans, with cans further devided between aluminum and non-aluminum. Until we moved out here, we could co-mingle (they used that word, I'm just parroting.)

      My guess would be that you are correct that currently aluminium is cheaper and easier to recycle. However, your comment "I would rather the manufacturer pay for it than my local co-op recycler" is a bit naieve. If the aluminum can is more expesive, they'll simply charge you more. That's not to say that, if the composite can is cheaper, they won't just scarf up the extra profit, mind you. If it is cheaper, it will allow them room to move the price down as necessary to encourage use of the new format, though. Once in a while that results in the price staying lower.

    5. Re:How recyclable is it? by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      with cans further devided between aluminum and non-aluminum

      That's probably a waste. They'll still have to pass them under a magnet because of stupid people who don't know the difference, or lazy people who just don't seperate. It's not very hard to automatically seperate steel cans from aluminum cans.

    6. Re:How recyclable is it? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, that's exactly why i think it won't make it here(in finland).

      here all beverage/soda/juice cans have a pawn on them(15cents), the pawn-o-mats used to return the cans just crush the cans, so these plastic 'cool' cans wouldnt fit in. and they sure ain't going to replace all those automats for pointless one can.

      actually most people dislike cans around here anyways, except when trolling tax-free beer from foreign countries/cruises(note that these cans don't fit into the pawn-o-mats, theres a code on the cans that gets read).

      one major thing to include: NOBODY WILL BUY BEER IN PLASTIC CONTAINER!!! (even if the plastic wouldnt hurt taste)

      iirc the can return system makes them as environmentally friendly as return bottles that get used ~5-10(did a school project on the issue and this is iirc from few years back) times before crashing and making new(both plastic thick soda bottles and glass 0.3-1l bottles, they're not like the usual thin soda bottles i've seen elsewhere).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:How recyclable is it? by YaRness · · Score: 2

      >>NOBODY WILL BUY BEER IN PLASTIC CONTAINER!!!

      they already do if you haven't noticed, there's been plastic bottles of shitty beer out for years.

      and if you drink beer out of a can*, you clearly don't have enough taste to care about what kind of container it comes in.

      * - a notable exception to this is draught cans.

    8. Re:How recyclable is it? by www.whitehouse.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone know which is more environmentally sound to recycle: plastic or aluminum? I would have guessed the aluminum requires less energy and releases fewer gasses than plastic, but I'm not sure.

      Aluminum. Virgin aluminum is a bitch on the environment (in terms of pollutants and land use), recycled is a hell of a lot better. Of course, recycled plastic is even better than that.

      --
      Mod me down and I shall become more trollish than you can possibly imagine!
    9. Re:How recyclable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that Guinness is the gold standard for narrow-minded beer snobs, what do you think of this?

    10. Re:How recyclable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is a draught can? And don't tell me that it is sticking some plastic widget to make bubbles, as referred to in the above AC post, that makes the difference for the discriminating palette between "crappy" can beer from "snobby" can beer.

    11. Re:How recyclable is it? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      cultural differences then..

      you don't want to troll few 24packs(4 per person isn't that uncommon) of glass bottles out from a cruiseboat and then from a bus to your home, 4 24packs of cans is much more convenient. and cans aren't considered bad for beer here.

      nobody would settle to drink beer from plastic container around here, maybe one could buy IF IT WAS cheaper(it doesn't really matter when drinking to get drunk, and got seperate glass), but the cost of beer doesn't really depend around here on how cheap it is to manufacture or bottle. 0.33l glass bottles is the number one way to drink beer, and there's (also pawned) good plastic packs that hold 24 glass bottles for them(handy as festival chairs&etc, also handy for getting the bottles back to shop plus they make a moody sound when shaked when loaded full, kilikilikili), beer also comes in 1l glass bottles but rarely anyone drinks from them except when drinking with lunch/dinner/or so.

      fyi, beer costs here rougly 1$ per 0.33l bottle(or can).

      (draught can=keg with valve?)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:How recyclable is it? by Jahf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      However, your comment "I would rather the manufacturer pay for it than my local co-op recycler" is a bit naieve.

      Not in the least. I know I am going to be the one paying in the end no matter who bears the costs.

      The issue here is that my co-op recycler operates as a non-profit. They cover recycling costs with garbage [non-recyclable] fees ($2/can). I would rather the for-profit manufacturer deal with extra costs of bottling/canning than trickling it down to the local level.

      In fact, I'm purposefully paying -more- this way than if my recycler bore the brunt of the additional recycling cost (at least in the short term) since I pay nothing to drop off the recyclables.

      I'm willing to pay the little bit extra in the way of an aluminum fee to make sure I contribute that little bit less to the cost of recycling, thereby making recycling a more economical alternative and thereby making it more common.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    13. Re:How recyclable is it? by disappear · · Score: 2

      If you think that Guinness is the gold standard for narrow-minded beer snobs, you don't know any real beer snobs.

      Most REAL snobs don't like Guinness --- they may say, "It's the definitive dry Irish stout," but that's meant to damn it with faint praise.

      Real beer snobs will say, "Guinness isn't bad, but Dogfish Head's World Wide Stout is REALLY something," or "Young's double chocolate stout is really much tastier," or "Pyramid's Obsidian Stout is much hoppier, and much tastier."

      Moreover (replying to the parent comment, not this one) I'll note that Guinness in cans is worse than Guinness in bottles or on draft: in order for the draught widget to work right, the beer has to be waaaay too cold to properly enjoy.

    14. Re:How recyclable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point well taken. It is amazing how beer has become like wine used to be, where it is downright offensive to enjoy a pedestrian beer. I suppose it lets one feel superior to belittle standard beer when obviously any small brew (which is probably brewed at a large brewery anyway) with an obscure/odd name is far superior. Out one side of their mouth they'll talk about the sancity of the German purity law, then turn around and rant and rave about how good the chocolate malts and cranberry winter wheat brews are. The inconsistency in the arguments is usually lost on them.

    15. Re:How recyclable is it? by andyt · · Score: 1

      (draught can=keg with valve?)

      nah, it's a can with a... well... a widget inside.

    16. Re:How recyclable is it? by disappear · · Score: 2
      I suppose it lets one feel superior to belittle standard beer when obviously any small brew (which is probably brewed at a large brewery anyway) with an obscure/odd name is far superior.

      It's not the size of the brewery, it's the quality of the beer. There are some very large English and German breweries that make some excellent beer.

      Out one side of their mouth they'll talk about the sancity of the German purity law, then turn around and rant and rave about how good the chocolate malts and cranberry winter wheat brews are.

      Actually, chocolate malts (the kind used in brewing, not the kind from the soda shop) are in fact just malted barley, roasted in a particular way. So many (though not all) chocolate stouts are Rhineheitsgebot compatible. Though of course the Germans don't brew stouts.

      The Germans do brew wheat beers, though. Even though they're not rhgbt-compatible, technically. But the Germans don't put cranberries in. ;-)

      And the Rhgbt is BS anyway: the Belgians totally ignore it, and even their big breweries put out some of the world's most incredible beers.

  8. More garbage, less recycling by MrEfficient · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now aluminum cans are recycled by many people because they bring a decent price and there are many places they can be sold. But plastic? As far as I know, there's no money to be made by an individual in recycling plastic and if there is, I doubt it's as much as aluminum.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  9. Not at all new... by darkov · · Score: 2

    I was drinking out of these cans years ago (like 5 years). Yes, they looked somewhat "cool" becuase of the clear body, but they seemed to have disappeared. Was it becuase the contents tasted like crap? Packaging by itself isn't enough to make a successful product.

    1. Re:Not at all new... by DonFinch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Packaging by itself isn't enough to make a successful product.

      Two words: Brittney Spears

      --
      -- Insert wisdom here:
    2. Re:Not at all new... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "Packaging by itself isn't enough to make a successful product."

      Of course not. You also need a prize scam!

      Now you can get a FREE tricycle, or vacation in the bahamas if you just drink 5e99 cans of Mr. Blech!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  10. Plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. Finally we can get the plastic taste from cans too.

  11. "It doesn't taste the same" by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before the soda connoisseurs get on here and try to tell us they're not gonna like these because the soda from the metal cans tastes better than the soda from the plastic bottles, keep in mind the aluminum cans' interiors are coated with some sort of plastic material.

    Otherwise the carbonic acid would react with the aluminum, and leave you with a nasty taste (I believe due to Aluminum Oxide? but its been a while since high school Chemistry).

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some sort of" is the key term. The coating inside aluminum cans is not PET. Water from PET bottles tastes "funny". While sodas are almost only sold in PET bottles, water doesn't have as strong a taste of its own and almost always comes in glas bottles around here.

    2. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plastic bottles consist of many layers, so the inner coatings may still be the same.

    3. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find any definitive information on the coating materials, but they serve different purposes and are applied to very different surfaces.

    4. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by linuxbert · · Score: 2

      i am by no means a conousour, but i can taste a diffence between caned, and plastic bottled coke, and i like the caned one better.

      i dont know anything about the manufactureing process of either, but i think the contents of the can, taste better then the bottle, and avoid plastic for soda containers as a result.

    5. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by arb · · Score: 2

      i am by no means a conousour, but i can taste a diffence between caned, and plastic bottled coke, and i like the caned one better.

      But Coke in glass bottles tastes even better still! ;-) Thank God they have started selling Coke in glass again!

    6. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Otherwise the carbonic acid would react with the aluminum, and leave you with a nasty taste (I believe due to Aluminum Oxide? but its been a while since high school Chemistry).

      Aluminum oxide is not soluble and almost certainly doesn't have any taste (it's even more stable than silica).

      What you get after dissolving aluminum with an acid is hydrogen and an aluminum-based salt. This would be aluminum carbonate for carbonic acid, and aluminum phosphate for the phosphoric acid many drinks use as a flavouring agent.

      I left a case of coke unused for about 6 months once. Tasted very odd after the lining broke down.

    7. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I left a case of coke unused for about 6 months once. Tasted very odd after the lining broke down.

      Did you die from drinking it?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    8. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      I left a case of coke unused for about 6 months once. Tasted very odd after the lining broke down.

      Did you die from drinking it?

      Not yet, though I suppose the jury's still out.

      Strangely, it gave one heck of a caffeine/sugar rush. Not that I'm about to repeat the experiment.

    9. Re:"It doesn't taste the same" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you die from drinking it?

      Oh, obviously. As you demonstrate quite well, it takes someone with absolutely no life to post here.

  12. New for marketing geeks? by Bobo_The_Boinger · · Score: 1

    This isn't news for nerds, it is news for marketing geeks. And those two groups are certaintly not the same!

    Really though, this is nothing new. It is just using old technology to try to make people buy more of something that everyone needs less of (put your own link to children becoming fat on soda/pop/cola/coke here please).

    --
    --David
  13. the thing that concerns me the most. by Tesseract · · Score: 1

    "The Beverage Network" merits it's own website complete with a news and reviews sections...I am, however, completely dissappointed in the lack of a Mountain Dew review. I mean, wth?

    --
    Show me what you want, and I'll show you how to get along without it...
  14. How is this different from... by Gid1 · · Score: 2

    this?

    I remember these transparent plastic cans with standard aluminium top at least ten years ago, selling here in the UK.

    AFAICR, the drink itself was foul.

    1. Re:How is this different from... by Cy+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah the technology is definately not new, this has been the standard format for tennis ball cans for well over a decade. The question is market acceptance and given the recycling concerns, I can't see that being too great.

      You can already get beer in plastic bottles in the US but most people think the beer will not taste as good (for the Miller, Lite, and MGD brands that use the technology, taste isn't really a concern anyway - but somehow these consumers consider themselves beer conoisseurs if you change the bottling material). So given the limited acceptance of plastic bottles I've only seen them at sporting events where it is prefereable not to arm potentially drunken disgruntled fans with glass missiles just in case the home team loses.

    2. Re:How is this different from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not anymore - Cleveland fans threw thousands of plastic bottles on the field at a game recently, and I think they're banned in the NFL now.

  15. Re:Pop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can this be marked Redundant when it's the FIRST POST?

  16. A New Revenue Source by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 2
    It looks like Slashdot has discovered a new source of income: turning press releases into headlines. It's far from original, but it works -- for a while, anyway.

    At least I hope Slashdot collected some money for the headline. If not, they're bigger suckers than those of us who read the article.

    1. Re:A New Revenue Source by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It looks like Slashdot has discovered a new source of income: turning press releases into headlines. It's far from original, but it works -- for a while, anyway.

      Newsflash for you, and for every other maroon who parrots the "Slashdot is selling out" / "Slashdot should charge advertising fees" lines; This is a site dedicated to news for nerds. Nerds like gadgets. They like cool toys, fast processors, high speed RAM, water cooling to make the best out of their new high speed toys, mods to make their toys look good, caffeinated products, sugary foods - how else is a news site supposed to tell people about these products without, oh, mentioning them by name? Are you going to clamour that they should charge AMD for announcing the Athlon 64 release to the market? Or they they should invoice Intel for announcing the Pentium 4 4.0GHz?

      It's news. Get over it. If you don't like it, go somewhere else and be uninformed. Stick to your Celeron 400MHz and thinnet LAN and quit bitching. It's old, and nobody cares.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:A New Revenue Source by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 2
      I don't mind if Slashdot sells out. They're a business, after all.

      But promoting plastic sugar-water cans is pretty far afield from "News for Nerds". I don't see any way to turn these things into a microwave antenna. What's next, pearlescent eye-shadow colors? Britney's new album? (I'd better be careful, maybe Katz has already done those!)

    3. Re:A New Revenue Source by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's worked for AP and Reuters for quite a while now.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  17. Re:Pop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy. When you say what everybody else is thinking, you're being redundant.

    Hey, kids, can you spell "redundant?"

  18. There are nerds, and there are nerds... by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 1
    From the article: "Our PET cans have the body of a traditional can, but the soul of an O-I PET bottle," said David L. Andrulonis...
    This guy needs to "get out more" at least as much as your average /.er.

    DDB (who sees no need to migrate from the all-plastic 20-oz form factor)

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  19. Cool factor? by Kj0n · · Score: 2

    Does this mean this can will keep my drink cool at all times?

    Or am I just expecting too much?

  20. Re:this one is unrecyclable by Bastian · · Score: 2

    Well, technically you can separate the aluminum from the plastic, but no consumer is going to take the time to do that - most people are still too lazy to take the screw caps off their plastic pop bottles before throwing them in the bin - and there is no way that it will be financially feasible for recycling companies to separate the aluminum from plastic themselves.

    Personally, this idea pisses me off enough to keep me from purchasing ever again from companies that bottle their beverages in these cans.

  21. Plastic/Aluminum by Atomizer · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else remember the old New York Seltzer plastic can just like this from the 80's? I remember everyone boycotting them because of the recycling issues. They stopped making them pretty quickly.

    1. Re:Plastic/Aluminum by NTDaley · · Score: 1

      Shoosh...
      Consumers aren't supposed to have memories that long.

      --
      bits and peace
      Nicholas Daley
  22. what's next? by js7a · · Score: 2

    I have to disagree, the topic is, as they say, on.

  23. Slashdot... by espresso_now · · Score: 1

    Ads for nerds, stuff that sells

    --
    Of course, and I highly suspect it, I may be talking out of my ass. -oqti
  24. Americans will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American beer is shitty, I don't think anyone will care about drinking beer from a plastic "can". It isn't as though beer in an aluminum can tastes good. Besides, we're used to drinking beer in plastic cups at sporting events and keg parties, so it isn't that big of a deal.

    But I hope this doesn't catch on, due to all the loser states that don't have deposits for beverage containers. Even the ones that do are only 5 or 10 cents, that ought to be raised to 20 or 25 cents so it is worth it for people to return them instead of tossing them in the trash!

  25. Beam me up, Scotty! by rubicon7 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think of Star Trek IV when they read the article?

    --
    --- We are not in the 8th dimension. We are over New Jersey.
    1. Re:Beam me up, Scotty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  26. Japan has the opposite! by mcgroarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Japan, you can buy bottles made completely out of aluminum. It's an aluminum can narrowing into a neck at the top with a traditional metal twist-off cap, and it's got a sticker around it which looks much like the decoration on a standard Coke can.

    1. Re:Japan has the opposite! by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Canada, also..

      Or at least I think that's where this can came from.. I found it in the car, it says taboo on it.. strange.

      josh

  27. Excellent! by Neumann · · Score: 1

    Now I can find the one with the finger in it without having to open them all!

  28. To be or not to be stupid... by DaveOnNet · · Score: 1

    If the stupidity or laziness of a few makes the efforts of everyone else useless (they still have to pass them under a magnet), then the industrious and smart people should rebel and pretend they're stupid to send a message that thier time and efforts are being wasted.

    However, the magnet that processes steel might be part of a system that can't handle aluminum and vice versa, so the magnet simply causes a small percentage of material to be rejected. In this sense, the stupid people generate rejected material, but the efforts of the smart people are not wasted. It would be interesting if someone who knew explained how the recycling system works.

    --
    Rank comments and posts against each other at We-Rank.com
    1. Re:To be or not to be stupid... by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the stupidity or laziness of a few makes the efforts of everyone else useless (they still have to pass them under a magnet), then the industrious and smart people should rebel and pretend they're stupid to send a message that thier time and efforts are being wasted.

      I'm sure technology has advanced sufficiently from when the following happened to prevent it, since it was over 10 years ago, but this is why I bet they still have to pass all the cans under a magnet:

      When I was in high school I worked in the kitchen periodically (we all had to rotate through cleanup duty). We had a recycling program run by our trash collection service. They provided statistics for us comparing what percentage (by weight and volume) of the things we threw away went to the landfill or were recycled. They were printed on greenbar and hung weekly on the board in the office. The recycling bins for cans were the extra large barrels with the hook and bar on them to be auto-loaded in the truck. After removing both ends of the can and stomping it flat, you could fit about 700 pounds of steel in the barrel. One week the recycling percentage dropped dramatically. The reason, they explained to us, was that someone had put an aerosol can in with the metal recyclables, and it made the whole load useless when they processed it. It's a great example of the stupidity of the few making everyone else's efforts useless when it comes to recycling.

  29. Re:Pop? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Because the moderator is a retard? That's what meta-mod is for.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  30. Should be Using Transparent Aluminum by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2
    or, more accurately, transparent alumina.

    here's the prior-art non-patent application:
    Method for making recycleable transparent beverage containers
    • heat up some alumina really hot
    • form it into a tube
    • seal the bottom
    • fill the can
    • crimp on the top
    • sell it for a huge premium
    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Should be Using Transparent Aluminum by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

      And it will weigh 5 pounds. You find someone who is willing to lug around 120lb case of flavored soda water.

      --
      1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
    2. Re:Should be Using Transparent Aluminum by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And it will weigh 5 pounds

      A five pound can? Huh? This isn't extra-thick uranium. 'Splains yourself Lucy. Normal cans are made of aluminum.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Should be Using Transparent Aluminum by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he is proposing making them from sapphire (alumina). At least you could use the discarded cans to make a really neat shed with clear walls that was nearly indestructible.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  31. Glacier Fruit Flavoured Drinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I remember in health food shops here in the UK there used to be a soft drink (flavoured water) in a can exactly as described.

    It was called 'Glacier' or something similiar, maybe glacial.

    Very refreshing fwiw as well, and this was at least 10 years ago.

    Nothing new here, move along.

  32. Insulation? by joelt49 · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering how these "new" pop cans will compare to the old ones (if the "new" ones even succeed) in terms of keeping my Coke colder, longer. AFAIK, plastic is a better insulator than metal, but there are exceptions. Nevertheless, will it keep my cold drink cold (at least longer than in the old Aluminum cans)?

    1. Re:Insulation? by 3waygeek · · Score: 2

      True, but it'll take longer to get cold, meaning increased refrigeration costs, which you'll end up paying for one way or another.

  33. I don't care. by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

    Caffine comes from coffee. Coffee does not come in cans. Or at least, good coffee does not.

    Unless they can convince the folks at Guinness to bottle me Draught in the techno can so I can see the nitro widget kick off, I really could give a rats ass less.

    1. Re:I don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us who hate coffee and still want caffiene, there is still pop.

  34. Aha! by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1


    1. Given the moniker of 'Silver Bullet', can makers have historically tried

    2. in vain to reduce the dangerous aura of aluminium beverage cans by
      adding saftey tabs, wider mouth ports, and even larger sized cans.

      Now with the technological advent of non-lethal weaponry, can makers
      have taken inspiration in the design of so called 'plastic bullets', hence the
      new handsome containers and confident consumers.
    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  35. Re:this one is unrecyclable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people are still too lazy to take the screw caps off their plastic pop bottles before throwing them in the bin


    Some of us do better than that.

    I, for one, save all the Tyvek I can find. Then I make a point of throwing it, in smallish squares of about 8x10 inches, in with the 'Office Paper' recycling at work. If you want to see a recycling program REALLY screwed up, you need to see what Tyvek does in a 'pulp' of office paper.
  36. This just in... by docbrown42 · · Score: 2

    ...Coke and Pepsi sale drop drasticly as consumers finally see what kinds of crap they've been drinking all these years!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  37. Nearly Ready? by John+Sullivan · · Score: 2

    A clear plastic 'can' and that's it? We've had these for several years in the UK - it was indeed just a 'cool' market attempt. They also had small carefully-density-controlled jelly balls floating throughout the drink. Seems to have pretty much died by now.

    --
    This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
  38. Glass by sulli · · Score: 1
    yes. Glass is the vastly superior packaging choice - preferably the big reusable glass bottles.

    In Mighigan 10 years or so ago they still had reusable half liter bottles of pop (as they called it there). Excellent. I think these are gone now, though.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  39. Also this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Container makers have transparent intentions Joseph Pryweller CHICAGO -- December 02, 2002 Clear is here. Transparent is apparent in plastic packaging. Bad poetry aside, two plastic container makers are unveiling food and beverage products that they say could speed the conversion of containers to plastic from their metal or glass forebears. They are doing it by showing off see-through containers that they think will add consumer appeal. The transfer to plastic containers in itself is not that new. Since the late 1990s, a rush of new plastic bottles and food containers has hit store shelves. The parade of new replacement products continues unabated, said Thomas Dunn, director of development, technology and marketing for Printpack Inc., a film extruder and converter based in Atlanta. Examples include single-serve bottles and new shelf-stable barrier packages, Dunn said. ``There's a lucrative market right now for plastics,'' Dunn said. ``It's still a growth market.'' Two new products stand out for contributing to the growing interest in clear containers: * Toledo, Ohio-based Owens-Illinois Inc. is launching a PET soft drink can that is clear. Imagine the vending machine of the future. You hit the button and out pops your can of bubbly in clear plastic. You can actually see the liquid in each can. * Pechiney Plastic Packaging Inc. of Chicago is introducing what it claims is the world's first clear food jar made of multilayer, oriented polypropylene. Now, your pasta sauces can be packaged in a commodity plastic that can be heated easily and made at a cost lower than with PET, the previous standard-bearer for plastic containers. Both O-I and Pechiney are looking for development partners, namely high-volume end users, that can advance the technology that they have created in North American laboratories. But the companies believe they are onto something truly innovative for food and drink products. The companies talked about their products during Pack Expo International 2002, held Nov. 3-7 in Chicago. The plastic soft drink can draws parallels to the PET beer bottle, another product developed by O-I that turned heads when it was released. Like beer, soft drink cans might not be headed for immediate market takeoff, because interest could take some time to grow, said David Andrulonis, vice president of O-I's plastics group for food and beverage products. ``It's something that's going to be different, for people who want a product that's really interesting,'' Andulonis said at Pack Expo. ``What could be the differentiator is the ability for us to add any shape or embossed logo to this can.'' The company is starting with simple-shaped cans that mimic their 12-ounce aluminum cousins. The prototype even had a metal flip-top lid. The cans can also be made with a plastic closure. O-I first showcased the can in October at InterBev '02 in Atlanta. The can design follows the path of clear-plastic beer bottles. It is made with the same blow molded PET construction, with two layers of the resin sandwiching proprietary barrier material that protects against the permeation of oxygen and carbon dioxide. The barrier layer keeps carbon dioxide in and oxygen out, helping to preserve the soft drink's taste, color and shelf life, Andrulonis said. Another patented O-I technology, SurShot, precisely measures the amount of barrier material that goes in each can, he said. That keeps the pricey substance at a minimum, as low as 1.5 percent of the total package weight. The product has possibilities for juices, sports drinks, isotonics and other beverages, Andrulonis said. In addition, the cans can be made with as much as 35 percent post-consumer resin. The product was the first effort under O-I's reorganized product-development team. Last fall, the company pooled its research and development work in Toledo. It had been more splintered, operating at locations such as its Continental PET facility in Bedford, N.H. ``We wanted to pull together our development expertise in Toledo and see what we could come up with,'' Andrulonis said. ``You're seeing the first fruits of those labors.'' The company hopes those efforts will provide another spike to PET containers. Although the major companies are starting to commercialize plastic beer bottles, that market is taking time to develop. Meanwhile, those same PET containers are being used for new flavored alcoholic beverages, such as hard lemonades and iced teas, Andrulonis said. PET soft drink cans could take acceptance another step, he said. The company expects to have a soft drink product on the market by the middle of 2003, Andrulonis said. Several undisclosed companies are evaluating the product. At Pechiney, hopes are equally high for its Gamma Clear container, made with two layers of OPP and an oxygen barrier resin. As with O-I, Pechiney's barrier material is made with ethylene vinyl alcohol. But while O-I is gunning for the metal-can market, Pechiney wants to replace glass food containers and those now made with PET. Three years in development, the containers have properties similar to PET but at a lower cost, said Martin Matushek, Pechiney director of marketing and strategy for global plastic bottles. While PET containers have difficulty with heat, the OPP jars can be heated to temperatures as high as 205ø F without losing their shape, he said. ``It's the first plastic jar that can get as hot as you want it to get,'' Matushek said at the Pechiney booth during Pack Expo. ``They have some performance advantages over PET.'' Meanwhile, Pechiney wants to take advantage of the continued conversion from glass jars to plastic. A major market exists for all sorts of products, including containers holding jams and jellies, pickles, salsa and pasta sauces, Matushek said. Pechiney has been developing the containers at its preform mold facility in Bellevue, Ohio, and its stretch blow molding plant in Batavia, Ill., he said. Pechiney has been working with several equipment suppliers to make the OPP bottles and, like O-I with its clear cans, has received commercial approval from the Food and Drug Administration. Now the company is seeking development partners to bring the PP product to market, Matushek said. The company is boosting its bottle-manufacturing operations in North America and Europe. The company, part of Paris-based Pechiney Group, broke ground in August on a new bottle plant in Orange, France, that is expected to move to full production late this year. That facility will focus on the French private-label condiment market, another possibility for the OPP jars, Matushek said. Ketchup containers could be especially appealing in OPP, he said. However, PET is not going away, especially now that it has captured some of the glass and metal market. Some new choices seem clear. At Pack Expo, Amcor PET Packaging - the world's largest maker of PET containers - unveiled multiserve, heat-set bottles in a variety of configurations. Products include new bottles with better ergonomic grips, now being used for Clearly Canadian flavored water, and those that can be heated to 190 F. ``We have a lot of potential customers that are using glass,'' said spokeswoman Becky Streby, based at Amcor's North American headquarters in Manchester, Mich. ``They'd switch to PET if we can make the containers like glass, with long-neck bottles and other features.'' And Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich., is touting a ripening rigid-packaging product portfolio that includes PP resins for clear, multilayer bottles and PE materials with improved clarity. ``The [containers] are coming on strong for food-type applications, for shelf appeal and shelf life, and in drink cups,'' said Glenn Wright, Dow market manager for rigid packaging in North America. ``It crosses over to all segments with polyesters and polypropylene.'' O-I is taking an imaginative approach with its plastic cans, envisioning a day soon when a six-pack of PET-based soft drink cans is snatched by consumers during supermarket shopping trips. ``We're starting to see activity from our customers interested in this,'' Androlonis said. ``We may not see a big bell curve upward immediately with the [cans]. But the potential volume and size of the market is huge.'

  40. And this too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Plastic cans' pose problems December 16, 2002 The Dec. 2 issue of Plastics News, reports that the ``plastic can'' was recently reintroduced by Owens-Illinois Inc. (``Container makers have transparent intentions,'' Page 1). Those with historical knowledge of plastic packaging and the laws governing container recycling are baffled. More than 15 years ago a company called Petainer considered the hybrid container, but soon rejected it due to unresolved recycling issues. If this new container is so innovative, why haven't the recycling solutions been disclosed? The first generation of plastic cans threatened to contaminate the PET recycling stream with PVC labels, as did the aluminum top. O-I's latest creation, if released, would contribute to an emerging contamination problem because of its multilayer components, not to mention the aluminum top. Even the reported ambitious potential of 35 percent recycled content fails to mitigate the impending loss to the recycling industry at large. Did O-I consider consulting the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers before developing such a recycling nightmare? Aluminum top aside, multilayer containers may be recycled with traditional PET bottles in low percentages. If the percentage of multilayer containers grows, the barrier material will create significant problems for recyclers, jeopardizing the current PET recycling infrastructure. It is stated that O-I developed technology (SurShot) to limit the amount of barrier material used in layers to decrease their own cost. Unfortunately, they failed to develop the technology that would decrease the cost that society would bear if the plastic can floods the waste stream. O-I may be able to ignore increased recycling costs in some states, but in California, industry foots a significant portion of the bill. Increased costs to recycle leads to increased processing fees for beverage makers, which are O-I's potential customers. One way O-I could shirk costs in California would be to use a No. 7 (Other) recycling code since No. 7 recycling rates are significantly lower than PET recycling rates. Since the current law actually penalizes industry as recycling rates increase, O-I could pay the portion of the processing fee for No. 7s, which would save a bundle. The question is whether soda giants are willing to take the public heat for bottling in a nonrecyclable container and gamble on the notion that the law will remain the same. We encourage Owens-Illinois and all other container makers to consider the recycling issues when developing a new product. All practical issues aside, what is so innovative about a container that mimics the aluminum can? Plastic soda bottles that fall from vending machines already offer transparency, but they also offer rescrewable caps - and they can be recycled! Heidi Melander Zero Waste Committee, Northern California Recycling Association San Francisco

  41. You left off one... by Valdrax · · Score: 2

    "Soft drink" -- a holdover from Prohibition times that's still used today. I've lived in the South, and I don't think I've ever heard "fountain drink" used except maybe to specifically refer to whether or not a drink comes from a can or a fountain. "Soft drink" is definitely more popular where I've lived, with "Coke" being the most often.

    (However, even living in Georgia, I've never actually heard anyone call any non-cola drink a "Coke." Ever.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:You left off one... by Jahf · · Score: 2

      I was in Nashville for a few years and there it was mostly Coke or fountain drink (but you're right, only when in an establishment with a fountain).

      In Huntsville, AL it was hard to tell because so many people were not from there, but many of the natives used Coke or, yep, soft drink ... knew I'd forget something. Though one of my best friends would always refer to it as "getting a Dew" even on the rare occasions when he meant something other than Mountain Dew.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  42. Sounds pretty cool... by dagg · · Score: 2
    Being a 23 year old woman, these things sound pretty cool. I can't wait to try them out. I bet they had people like me in mind when they made them (my demographic).

    But I wonder how dirty they get? Plastic seems to attract dirt worse than aluminum.

    --
    Sex - Find It
    1. Re:Sounds pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're neither 23, nor a woman. I'd say, judging from all your posts, that you are 14 years old, and a boy who wishes he were a woman.

    2. Re:Sounds pretty cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing that you state that you're 23 years old and female in every post, I'd say that you were more likely a homosexual, 14 year old male waiting for a big slobbering lunix hippie of a man to compile YOUR kernel.

      Please drown in a pool of semen.