Slashdot Mirror


FCC to Permit Complete Media/Telecom Consolidation

rhwalker22 writes "Today's Washington Post has a piece reviewing some of the major decisions the Federal Communications Commission will be making in the next few months, moves that could fundamentally rewrite the rules for the broadcast media and Internet service providers. Excerpt: 'Opponents of the proposed rules fear that, taken together, they ultimately could lead to a few powerful conglomerates controlling the flow of electronic information, from programming of television and radio news and entertainment to owning the pipes that connect people to the Internet.'"

24 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. huh? by TCaptain · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Opponents of the proposed rules fear that, taken together, they ultimately could lead to a few powerful conglomerates controlling the flow of electronic information, from programming of television and radio news and entertainment to owning the pipes that connect people to the Internet.

    And how this is different from today?

    --
    "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    1. Re:huh? by avi33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I got news for you, these *are* the good times.

      Imagine if Sony, your ISP/cable company, decides that you, as a consumer, really only need port 80. Their TOS allows them to monitor your computer for p2p apps, and while you're free to 'license' (listen to once, without recording) sony music and video for a small fee, any non-sony media will be subject to a bandwidth cap...so if you listen to non-sony internet radio, you hit your cap 4 days into the month. ...or, you could always try your hand with the other ISP, MicroDisneySoft.

    2. Re:huh? by akb · · Score: 5, Informative

      The specific rules which are on the chopping block are the TV/radio crossownership restriction, the TV/newspaper restriction, caps on ownership on numbers of tv and radio stations that one entity can own in a market and nationally. See the Association of Independent Film and Videomakers advocacy page.

      Another good resource is at the Center for Digital Democracy.

    3. Re:huh? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess us libertarian geeks will just have to set up our own channels of communications.

      The Libertarians' flawed belief that a Corporation Can Do No Wrong is what got us into this situation in the first place.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:huh? by kableh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a hurry, messed up the links. Sorry for the repost.

      Of course!

      One promising GPL one is Locust World, which combines a bootable Linux distro with the AODV routing software, 802.11 drivers, NAT functionality, and more. The AODV libraries are open source, and you could apply this to just about any wireless medium. More info about AODV in general here.

      And of course, the company I work for has a proprietary solution, but it is dependent on using our 802.11b card for the time being. That, and we aren't mass producing hardware at the moment. The tech is certainly there though! Mesh networking with 802.11 is just extending the topology of the wired internet to the wireless world.

      As far as routing goes, ad hoc on-demand routing (implemented by the AODV libraries I mentioned above) is probably the best solution for building a scalable network. Wireless links are inherently unreliable, so a pure distance vector algorithm like RIP isn't the best solution, and routing updates on a large network would have a lot of overhead with many nodes.

      Forgive me if I glossed over the subject, hopefully other can fill in the blanks =).

  2. Unification by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    You'll have to start making out your cheques to "AOL-TimeWarner-Disney-MGM-Universal, an Exxon Company"

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Unification by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who needs banks? Since you'll work for them, they'll just keep an account for you at the company store, which will be always just slightly negative in balance.

  3. Last Chance to Diss Your ISP by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get in your shots now. In a few months, your service agreement will forbid such anti-corporate comments. And since they corporations work for the common good, that's reasonable. Now sit down, watch Rollerball, take your pills and stop idolizing Jonathan. Rollerball is not about individuals.

  4. Well... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it gets bad I can always use carrier pigeons to connect. So long as it isn't hunting season my packet loss should be acceptable.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  5. Re:reg. required??? by Hemos · · Score: 5, Informative
    Um...you thought wrong?

    No, we prefer not linking to them, but given that most sites are switching to that, I don't really see a choice in the matter.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  6. this is a good thing by Fict · · Score: 4, Funny

    i work for a *major* US telecom provider, and i must say this:

    DON'T PANIC.

    trust me on this one. yes, we do have plans to merge with at least three other companies, mostly medium-sized regional providers. what we haven't told you, however, is that this merge will allow us to provide high-end DSL service to residences across the country for less than $10 / mo.

    we will be able to do this due to the fact that there will be no middle-man provider. there are also some amazing projects in the works regarding satellite and wireless data transmission. think: global wireless network, anywhere in the world, anyone in the world, no charge. the bandwidth will be limited to 19.2 bps initially, but the coverage will be absolutely ground-breaking.

    what's in it for us? .. yes, there is a catch...

  7. Define Irony by jweb · · Score: 5, Funny

    At one hearing last summer, Hollings all but called Powell a shill for big business in general and the large regional telephone companies in particular.

    So, if I got read this correctly, Fritz (Disney) Hollings is calling Powell a corporate whore?

    --

    Think For Yourself. Question Authority.
    1. Re:Define Irony by (trb001) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Irony is the wrong word...hypocrisy is the one you're looking for.

      --trb

  8. This is already happening... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Opponents of the proposed rules fear that, taken together, they ultimately could lead to a few powerful conglomerates controlling the flow of electronic information, from programming of television and radio news and entertainment to owning the pipes that connect people to the Internet.

    This is already happening with Radio. Proof? Two words: Clear Channel.

    Do you have a KISS-FM in your town? That's Clear Channel. They're putting cookie-cutter pop radio stations (all called KISS-FM) in major markets. In addition to owning KISS-FM in nearly every market, they own TV stations, billboards, concert venues, etc.

    Check out this link.
    Click here and search for 'kiss' -- you'll find 51 stations, all the same format, all the same manufactured pop stars, all the same type of dopey deejays.

    Its radio like this that keeps me listening to CDs.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  9. I think I heard this on the news by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    But they assured the audience that the changes were double-plus good.

  10. Obvious by Qrlx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Opponents of the proposed rules fear that, taken together, they ultimately could lead to a few powerful conglomerates controlling the flow of electronic information

    Shouldn't that be fewer powerful conglomerates?

    Deregulation of the telecom industry has brought us the lowest rates ever! Of course, we're paying fees, taxes, tariffs, surcharges, adjustments, and recoupments that didn't even exist before, but look -- deregulation must work because rates are lower.

    The situation with deregulation in this country has put the foxes in charge of hen house.

    For my opinion of FCC Chairman Michael Powell, read my other post.

  11. Rule Number 1: by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    When someone from a major corporation explains that what they are doing is a good thing and exclaims

    DON'T PANIC

    the one thing you can be sure you need to do forthwith is PANIC!!!!

    No delays now. Start running down the streets screaming at the top of your lungs, rending your clothes and flinging yourself into plate glass windows. It's for your own good.

  12. Example of a media company controlling a country by Lobsang · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brazil is a good example of what happens when media corporations are allowed to do whatever they want.

    Brazil's biggest media company is called "Rede Globo" (Globo Network). They own radios (both AM and FM), TV stations across the country and newspapers.

    It's hard to describe the power of such corporations although the US is beginning to have a glimpse of what happens when media becomes a tycoon controlled business.

    Rede Globo's ascent to power began in the mid 60's when they sided unilateraly with the military (Brazil was forcefully ruled by the military for 20 years starting in 1964, with lots of torture and deaths -- all with the consent of the US governement, but then it's a different story). Newscasts at that time use to portray any opposer as "subversive". The whole thing grew to be what it is today: A big conglomerate with tentacles in all sections of the society.

    One interesting example is what happened to "Fernando Collor", a whacko that eventually got elected as the Brazilian President some years ago. Globo supported Collor fiercely, as the other candidate was Lula (the current Brazilian president). Corporations were very afraid that a left wing candidate would win and Globo used all their power in favor of Collor. Later, winds changed and Collor started to go really nuts. Result: Globo gave all attention (nationwide!) to anti-Collor movements across the country. Lots of dust under the rug came to light and he was eventually impeached.

    And if this was not enough, consider this: In the US, when Britney Spears starts singing on the radio you just say a few bad words and change the station (OK, OK, it's going to be hard to find a good one). In Brazil, when Globo wants to impose a new fad, you'll see that on TV most of the time, you'll listen on a few radio stations and on the highest circulation newspapers. You cannot escape the annoyance. You just cannot.

  13. here comes the dictatorship by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Opponents of the proposed rules fear that, taken together, they ultimately could lead to a few powerful conglomerates controlling the flow of electronic information, from programming of television and radio news and entertainment to owning the pipes that connect people to the Internet.

    Which is of course what you would want if you were trying to subvert democracy and freedom...a task some members of the current administration have already made great inroads on.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:here comes the dictatorship by thelexx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Someone had this quote in their sig on another thread:

      "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power" -- Mussolini

      Needless to say, I saved it!

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  14. Chomsky's Media Control by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Informative
    Whether you agree with his views or not, Noam Chomsky never fails to make you think, even if it's just to formulate a response to his arguments.

    If you're interested in the effects of media consolidation and government propaganda, check out this short summary of a pamphlet Chomsky put out during the Gulf War.

    I disagree with huge chunks of what he says in this pamphlet and subsequent pronouncements. But he has been writing about the consolidation and manipulation of the American media for many years, and if current trends continue, his annoying rants may mirror the truth more closely than any of us would like.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  15. I can see it now.... by DailyGrind · · Score: 5, Funny

    One day I will wake up and unable to open the electronically controlled front door to my condo I will have to call North East America Inc support center....

    me: dial
    phone: Welcome to North East America Inc... your call is important to us... etc.. press 01 for support with your phone; 02 for support with cable; 03 for support with your internet; 04 for support with your climate control; .....etc.... 99 if you cannot open your door.

    me: 99... wait...
    phone: sir, your buildings central waste monitoring facility has detected trace amounts of marijuana. as you know drugs fund terrorism and terrorism is un-American. as a precaution we have temporarily detained all occupants pending an investigation

    me: what! ... I am going to e-mail my Congressman about this...
    phone: sir, the central e-mail monitoring facility has detected that your e-mails contain words like "high", "da bomb", and "explosive" and may refer to un-American activities and therefore your e-mail has been suspended...

    me: nuts!, I am moving out west!
    phone: sir, we have logged your request and are sending you a Western America Inc transfer form. There is a $20,000 transfer fee.

    me: thats it I am moving to Canada!
    phone: sir, only terrorists live in Canada... please stand by security services are on the way...we have restricted your TV to receive Lawyer commercials you may wish to watch while you wait... have a nice day.

    --
    You will have to pry my proprietary software $$$ from my cold dead hands!
  16. Competition is dying already :( by Ded+Bob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an ex-DirecTV DSL customer, I am seeing it disappear as we speak. The only provider in my area is now SBC. Whether or not the FCC does anything, I see competition as being dead.

    BTW, I would love the FCC to get rid of one regulation: the idiotic regulation that requires me to cancel DSL service before I can get another provider to even take an order. The same group comes out to disconnect me as will connect me five days later. I want to see down-times of hours not days nor weeks (if unlucky). How can people try out different competitors easily if they will have to wait so long?

  17. canada shows US the way by violently_ill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i just spent two weeks vacationing in snowy canada (i live in california) and while i was there i had the opportunity to learn about canada's internet. in short, it kicks ass. it is very fast, very resilient, very regulated, and most importantly, very cheap. the canadian government has been developing and regulating broadband since before anyone knew what broadband was and their investment has surely paid off. how does digital cable service AND broadband internet for $40/month sound? that's 40 candian dollars, or a little over $30 dollars american currency. not only that, but it's purported to be more resilient than the internet2 project that is just barely getting off the ground in the states. canada's regulated deployment scheme has made it one of the most wired nations in the world. we could learn a lot from them.