Slashdot Mirror


MMORPGs, Are You There Yet?

maddugan writes "CNN recently posted a story about a company by the name There and their opening of a public beta for their 'Virtual Universe'. One of the key element is that you can buy virtual Levis and Nikes for your Avatar. " Hemos & I have been playing The Sims Online- Come visit the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop on the absolute west edge of the Mt Fuji City and say hi. I got my real nick for once too! I love MMORPGs and 'There' looks like another wrinkle on taking Sims type games online. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.

163 comments

  1. frist psot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    frist psot

  2. oh ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    MMORPG is gay.

  3. Sim-Shag by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Whereever you go, There you are!

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
    1. Re:Sim-Shag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying virtual Levis and Cokes is a disgusting commercialization of what should be pure entertainment space. Supporting this rubbish in games while constantly trashing MS (deservedly or not) is hypocritical in the extreme and betrays the basic lack of a unified worldview exhibited by a small band of hobbyist-fanatics.

    2. Re:Sim-Shag by iriki · · Score: 0

      well said bro =)

    3. Re:Sim-Shag by 401k · · Score: 1

      I've played this Sims Online. To get your skills up, your poor little av has to sit there repeating mindless tasks for tiny amounts of money and skill. Virtual money they can then go spend on virtual McDonald's hamburgers or some such thing. Get rid of the middleman. Make the Sims have to sit in a Nike sweatshop for 24 hours before they walk around Sim Nike Town in a fricking Nike shirt. I love America, but there's a lot I hate about it too. Marketing, branding, the merchants of 'cool' top the hate list. I really hate seeing those bastards in my videogames.

  4. Speaking of games by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 1

    When the hell's Chris DiBona's (aka ChrisD) so-called "company" going to release their so-called "best game ever"?

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
  5. No. Flat out. by Ohmsee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MMORPG's are fine and they cater to a very select market. The fact the that select market is rather huge is irrellevant.

    I have not started playing Everquest, Anarchy Online, There, Sims Online, EOA, or any of the others that I might have missed. I have no plans to either. I play a mud. Text. Requires reading... I know, what a pain in the ass.

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
  6. Online Sims can be very addictive by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2

    specially this kind. I hope nobody gets hooked on to this, and forget to eat/sleep and end up unconscience like that guy in Korea(i think).

    1. Re:Online Sims can be very addictive by zazas_mmmm · · Score: 1

      I hope nobody gets hooked on to this, and forget to eat/sleep and end up unconscience like that guy in Korea

      Actually, he wound up dead.
      Not to worry, I think you'd notice your sim not looking well and get him a bed and some rest.

      --
      I'm a friend of a friend of the working class.
    2. Re:Online Sims can be very addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, he wound up dead.

      Oh No! That's the very worst kind of unconscience!

    3. Re:Online Sims can be very addictive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually according to the Amazon.com reviews, the Sims Online is really exciting at first but then it quickly becomes boring. I still can't get past the idea of paying a monthly fee to play I game I already bought!

  7. Re:frist psot not Ninnle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Almost had it! A first post for NINNLE!
    The greatest Linux distro yet!

  8. Yay, more dupes! by deepstephen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yep, it's a dupe.

    Come on CmdrTaco, that's two dupes you've posted on today's front page... go for the hat-trick!

    --

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (you come and go)
    1. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Karma: Chameleon (you come and go)

      Shouldn't that be:

      Karma: Typical male bastard (you come and go)

    2. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your prob, babe? You sound like a bitter lesbian.

    3. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a typical ignorant male who doesn't know that only straight women get screwed by men.

    4. Re:Yay, more dupes! by plone · · Score: 2

      GroundHog day comes early for Slashdot! Now if only there was a way that CmdrTaco could get Rita to fall in love with him.

    5. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be listening to the Indigo Girls and bitching about Ellen's show getting canned? But, like I said, you sound like a bitter lezbo. You diesel dykes think that just because a couple of guys are jerks, they all are. You ever think that it was *you* who was the insufferable bitch, and thus, you are the reason guys treat you like dirt? Just a thought for you while you and your SO are out shopping for new flannel shirts and getting your hair buzzed.

    6. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No because I, the author of post #5066665, am actually a man. It's just that I'm not typical nor ignorant.

      The point I'm making is that I've found that most diesel dykes are pretty good at taking care of themselves, and some I've known are deadly shots with a rifle.

      It's the doormat straight girls who get treated like dirt and walked out on, when all they wanted was a bit of a hug and some security.

      So don't diss lesbos. Once they work out a simple kit that changes skin cells into artificial sperm, the Y chromosome is finished.

    7. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's ok, Jaromir Jagr got one last night.

      12-2!!!!!

      12-2 babyyyyyyyyyy

    8. Re:Yay, more dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, we caps fans are anonymous cowards it seems.

  9. Wow! by dirtsurfer · · Score: 1

    This is such an interesting story! Just like when it was posted two days ago! :)

  10. As usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a dupe. The original Slashdot article can be found here: "Metaverse Launched?".

  11. Re:frist psot not Ninnle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    What the fuck's Ninnle anyway?

    Sure sounds funny though, when you say it ten times really fast!

    ninnleninnleninnleninnleninnleninnleninnleninnle ni nnleninnle

    Try it!

  12. Answer to my own question by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From Damage Studios' site:
    As far as The Game goes, we're on track for meeting our prototype deadlines, which makes everyone pretty buzzed. We had our second art review on Friday, and the concepts are really coming along. I don't want to go too far into that, because I don't want to ruin the anticipatory magic.

    Apparently, you can get frequent updates by signing up for the mailing list.

    Nice work so far, Chris.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Answer to my own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Hey Eric Krout, FUCK YOU

  13. Taco is a fucking Moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    2 dupes in under 10 minutes.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/08/1314 20 8

    1. Re:Taco is a fucking Moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Toner Cartridges new DMCA victim
      NewsPosted by CmdrTaco on Sunday January 12, @08:49AM

      MMORPGs, Are You There Yet?
      GamesPosted by CmdrTaco on Sunday January 12, @10:03AM


      If by 10 minutes, you mean 1 hour and 14 minutes, then yes.

  14. Do you smell something fishy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1
  15. it'll be really interesting when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you can "travel" from sims online to there, as in a vacation, pick up some stuff for the kids, and so on.

    After all, we don't all live in the same town but people do visit from time to time.

  16. I will kick CmdrTaco's ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Let's all burn down the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop!
    Your powers are useless there. muahahahaha

  17. Neighbors by moertle · · Score: 2

    OMG, I think CmdTaco and I are neighbors in Mt. Fugi.

    --
    I hold a patent on sigs...
  18. The Sims Online: Not There Yet by Fusty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's good to hear that some gamers are having a good time in the Sims Online - other user reviews have been less excited about the experience.

    Here's a short piece about the fallout in reaction to this most-touted game release: Sims Online: Be a PAYtester?

    1. Re:The Sims Online: Not There Yet by kien · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I beta-tested TSO. Took me about one hour to decide that it was fundamentally flawed. I'm glad they held the open beta because it convinced me that this was NOT a game I would enjoy.

      I think it's great when MMOG game developers offer open public beta-tests. It puts lots of eyeballs on their game (better chance that bugs will be found) and as the release of EQ taught us, it's never a bad idea to load-test your servers in beta. Also, if their game is good on a fundamental level (even if a few bugs still have to be found)...word of mouth will do all the pre-selling they'll need.

      Hopefully, There will get it right.

      --K.

      --
      Sig: Bad people happen. Try to avoid being one of them.
    2. Re:The Sims Online: Not There Yet by Ciannait · · Score: 1

      I couldn't even get the damned thing to launch.

      I spent weeks swapping emails with customer service, who asked me to re-install DirectX and other assorted useless things. I eventually decided that I would be just fine with playing Dark Age of Camelot's expansion, and that really, it wasn't life or death if I didn't play TSO.

      So much hassle for a game I probably would've hated anyway.

      --
      A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving.
    3. Re:The Sims Online: Not There Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pay-to-beta thing is kind of familiar.

      Does anyone remember when Black and White was released, and it *really sucked*? I bought it maybe a couple of weeks after it came out and had all kinds of problems - not so much just getting it to work like you would if you actually needed to upgrade something in your computer - but in the game itself. It would crash, there were many problems with the creature's AI, you couldn't get those damn annoying advisors to shut up, and all those cool extra things that were supposed to be in the game like soccer/football games, the mp3 player that the creature would dance to? Not there.

      Naturally, Lionhead (a division of EA like Maxis) fixed a number of the problems with a patch that came out about 3 months after the game's release. And the extras that were said to be with the game itself at release were made available online and required the patch to be installed. After it all, the game is not worthless, but remains pretty low on my list of top 100 games of all time. Some people have told me they actually like the game, so perhaps the off-the-shelf version now has all the stuff they were originally promising.

      Don't even get me started on Majestic.

  19. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm very hesitant after seeing how people get emotionally attached to stuff like this. I was at Radio Shack last year, and the guy behind the counter was foaming at the mouth over that microsoft game. It was kind of scary.

    1. Re:Nope by skinfitz · · Score: 2

      I was at Radio Shack last year, and the guy behind the counter was foaming at the mouth over that microsoft game. It was kind of scary.

      I think anyone would foam at the mouth when ask to pay $70 for M$ Flight Simulator...

    2. Re:Nope by praedor · · Score: 2

      Well, the whole thing is largely stupid/looney/ridiculous to begin with. Escape from your life for several hours a day (or more if you're a true major-league wacko) to...play at life again with the same crap you're "escaping" from: doing dishes, taking out trash, mowing your lawn, going to work, etc, etc. Sheesh.


      If I could enter one of these silly worlds as a terrorist or mad scientist and unleash virtual plagues "blow up" virtual diners or other "gatherings" then it becomes interesting - but the virtual people have to "die", that is, the characters don't get to come back to virtual life and the "owners" of the characters have to start anew with a new/different character. It becomes interesting then. It would be amusing in its effects on those people who get overly attached to a non-real avatar/persona.


      Basically, I would be interested in it if the users could turn the virtual world into some dystopian hell-hole by simply NOT being restricted in any way (by software rules/game rules). See what comes of it. Cool experiment and fun to play...and it IS only playing, and thus not worth the emotional investment too many people put into it.



      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    3. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your idea would probably end up like other online games where gangs of people with all the best equipment go around slaughtering weak players for the hell of it. A lot of MUDs are like this. Sort of like niggers in the ghetto I guess.

    4. Re:Nope by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Sounds like fun. Have you tried Ultima Online?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:Nope by praedor · · Score: 2

      Except in my vision, instead of there being a complete free-for-all where the strongest gang of players has their random way with anyone and everyone else, there could be a virtual police force, virtual militaries, etc, for in game policing. You do your thing but may pay the consequences ingame from virtual authorities, preferably made up of other people (no AI cheating).


      Of course, in standard RPGs it is possible to collect "magical" items or superweapons/armor, and character points such that your character becomes virtually invincible. Not so in my vision. Your persona is just as vulnerable as anyone else's. You never get to a point where you have some forms of magical superpowers or protections so that you are invulnerable. A lone sniper could take you out on his/her first day in the virtual world if they got lucky and knew what they were doing. Real-lifelike vulnerability is a must.


      As a leader of a group/band, you could also get offed by a treacherous member of your own group.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    6. Re:Nope by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have ALWAYS liked Player-killer muds. But I do realize the flaw for abuse in them. So what would be nice is to have guards in the city that can "see" actions from a room or two away at least. Attack a character... means being attacked by nasty guards. Then other pats of the world could be more dangerous with the lack of guards. You could even hire guards to escort you through the dark Mirkwood Forrest known to be rife with PK'ers.

    7. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply reply with glassy eyes, in a faraway voice, "Microsoft, yeah I've heard of them." Gets 'em everytime ;)

  20. The birth of Anonymous Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1
    Moderation is a game. The only way to win is not to play.

    What is the value of a dollar? The answer is that a dollar is worth as much as the government says it is worth. Money is a game we play to create scarcity in the face of abundance; it is a means of keeping track of something imaginary. So what is a Karma point worth? Well, it's worth whatever CmdrTaco says it's worth. Karma is an imaginary thing that has gained value through an electronic construct. sound familiar? The truth is that Slashdot is in many ways the first of the Massively Multiplayer Role Playing Games. Before the first castle in Ultima Online, there was a user with the most Karma to blow.

    Slashdot has changed quite a bit since those days. We have a strict levelling system defined now. Here are the various levels you can achieve, and the powers you are granted at each level:

    Levelling up

    Last I checked, here are the various levels in the vast Role Playing Game that is Slashdot:
    (Your score in the game is called 'karma'):

    • Score: -24 to -10: Ghost. Ghost players attack (post comments) with a -1 threshold, making them unable to hit any target except those who choose to be hit. Ghost players are limited to two attacks per day, and the label 'Terrible' is placed next to their name.
    • Score: -9 to -1: Zombie. Zombie players attack with a threshold of Zero, making only their subject lines visible and reducing the effectiveness of their attacks. Zombie players, like ghost players, can only attack twice per day, and the label 'Bad' is placed next to their name.
    • Score: Zero: Dying player. In this transitional state, a player appears to be a normal player, but the label 'Neutral' is placed by their name to signal that they are close to death.
    • Score: 1-12: Journeyman. A journeyman player can attack ten times a day with a score of one. The label 'Positive' is placed by their name.
    • Score: 12-25: Adventurer. An Adventurer attacks with the same effectiveness as a journeyman, but has the label 'Good' placed by their name.
    • Score: 26-50: Sword Saint. A sword saint can devastate his opponents in combat, attacking with a bonus of +2 and flaming them up to twenty-five times per day. Sword Saint players have a distinct advantage, but they are not invincible.


    Player killing

    So how do you turn a Sword Saint into a Ghost? Well, player killing is alive and well on Slashdot. I'm not going to go into the details of player killing in this article, but suffice it to say that it is possible to defend yourself from normal players but not from Editors. The best way to defend yourself is to create as many separate accounts as you can, and continue levelling them up. This is very time consuming, and it's one way to keep you 'hooked' on the game.

    Guilds

    Guilds are a recent addition to the game of Slashdot, and they were retro-fitted and bolted on in much the same manner that many MMORPG's added guild support after product launch due to massive player demands. Basically, Guilds allow you communicate more easily with your allies and gain bonuses to your attacks when attacking enemies, though these bonuses are temporary and cannot be used for player killing.

    How do I win the game?

    Before addressing how to win the Slashdot MMORPG, it's important to look at how other similar games are won. For instance, how do you win at Ultima Online? I believe the answer to that is that if you play, you have already lost. The only people winning in the MMORPG market are Origin, Microsoft, Verant, et al, i.e. the people taking your money. The more time you spend playing, the more time you spend losing. While you are questing for karma, trying to get just one more level, you are losing. Perhaps the only way to win is not to play.

    Consider for a moment that when you mark another account as a foe, you assign a numeric penalty to that person's comments which causes you to never view them again. This means you have judged everything this person will ever say in advance, and deemed those future words not worth viewing. You have prejudged them. You are engaging in automated prejudice. How do you explain that to your kids?

    The only way to win is not to play

    The game is a construct not just to waste your time but to manipulate what you say. If you have ever altered what you post to Slashdot because of fear of karma retribution or the possiblity of a karma reward, then you have bowed to the pressure of an artificial system, a plastic reality placed upon you in order to control you.

    I challenge you to break free of the system. You can still post comments to Slashdot without playing the game. You can do it very easily. Just post everything as an anonymous coward. How will people know it's you? Use you public key to sign your comments. If everyone did this, the game would be over, and everyone would win. It's a huge prisoner's dillema, to be sure, but only if you are still worried about getting a high score.

    This journal is probably being read by quite a few Sword Saints thinking to themselves 'how can I afford to stop attacking with my +2 bonus??'. Stop thinking inside the box. It's probably harming your brain.
  21. Re:No. Flat out. by mystran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interesting thing with MUDs seems to be that more reading they require, the less there are people that you'd rather play without. Another thing I like with MUDs is that once there is no need to get as big audience as possible, there need not be such compromises on the gameplay, which generally mean better game.

    --
    Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
  22. Hrm by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2
    Hemos & I have been playing The Sims Online- Come visit the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop on the absolute west edge of the Mt Fuji City and say hi. I got my real nick for once too! I love MMORPGs and 'There' looks like another wrinkle on taking Sims type games online. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out.

    I thought this would be a fitting UF comic, considering how Slashdot is supposed to be pro-freedom/anti-corporatism. Have fun SimPeddling your SimAss to EA for SimDollars. Go to the SimMac and have a SimHeartattack or buy a SimPentium4 with SimHyperthreading!

    1. Re:Hrm by Fizzol · · Score: 1

      I kind of liked this one . . .
      http://www.gucomics.com/d/20021111.html

    2. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hemos & I have been playing The Sims Online

      Yeah, and add to that the notion that Slashdot is anti-Microsoft and they're hawking a game (TSO) that only runs on Windows.

    3. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..considering how Slashdot is supposed to be pro-freedom/anti-corporatism."

      Um, since when?

      Last time I checked, Slashdot is supposed to be a bunch of articles from Hemos and CmdrTaco about things. Things they like. Like CowboyNeal's funny hat collection.

  23. Nikes by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 3, Funny


    Does it take you two weeks to earn enough virtual money to buy the latest Nike Jordans like in real life?

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  24. lol.. by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    I played a MMORPG from beta until the second year of it, the game had no structure.. we just stood around and talked. Max lvl is 48 and most people are 40, its taken them a year to get there. http://www.legendofmir.net/ -linkz/UniTY

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  25. Re:No. Flat out. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I played a MUD. The administrators were about as corrupt as an average politician and it was all being led by an unemployed welfare-supported hippie who wouldn't even recognize a "Bad Thing"(tm) if it hit him in the face at mach 2. Most of the players we're afraid to say anything and the few who did only droned out the words "I agree!" or something similiar to whatever ons of said administrators cried out in a fit of utter stupidity. That, and the basic idea of "You're not paying, so if you don't like it, go to hell." aren't very appealing to me. IF I would even want to play an online RPG every again, I'd either play one that's not massively multiplayer or one that is administrated by decent, unbiased folks.

  26. Re:No. Flat out. by Ohmsee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would entirely have to agree, based simply on the fact that in my last 14 years of mudding, some of the most fun I've had has been on a mud with 5-6 other people on it. I'm really not fond of the Massively Multiplayer Online Games. The only graphical online game I've ever played and liked was Medal of Honor:Allied Assault. But, it's not exactly the type of game that concentrates on interplayer relationships. Just go shoot someone. I used it to clear stress. I can't honestly think of a graphical interface that would work for most muds that I've played, for the reason that unless they're drawing the graphics from my mental images of the descriptions, it's not the same MUD.

    Just my .02

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
  27. What a bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Come visit the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop on the absolute west edge of the Mt Fuji City and say hi."

    10 seconds later, at the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop...

    +=---------=+
    |First post!|
    +=---------=+
    \/
    /
    .
    1. Re:What a bad idea. by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Lets see, 26 comments... Hmmm...

      My guess is that the Slashdot Charisma Sweatshop should be Slashdotted right around now.

  28. There's beta program by seldolivaw · · Score: 2

    I applied for There's beta testing program, and have been accepted. Apparently they invite new players "on a weekly basis" -- I'm still waiting impatiently for my invite! :-)

    1. Re:There's beta program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I appllied for the beta, and was informed that anything less than a 800Mhz Pentium was below their minimum requirements. Funny, Morrowind plays ok...

  29. Recursive dupeness by dipipanone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do we really need all these duplicate posts, telling us that the article is a dupe?

    Bad enough that it's a dupe in the first place without having to read fifty posts telling us so over and over again.

    1. Re:Recursive dupeness by jackbang · · Score: 1

      It serves two points: 1) to increase the chance that maybe something will be done in either the editorial process or on the technical end to reduce the number of dupes we've been seeing and 2) to point people who may not know it's a dupe to more discussion on the same subject that they might have missed otherwise

    2. Re:Recursive dupeness by Entropy_ah · · Score: 2

      But look what your about to start. Now people are going to complain about all the dupe posts to dupe stories then people are going to complain about dupes to those complaints. If this continues we are all going to be sucked into a black hole.

      --
      my other penis is a vagina
    3. Re:Recursive dupeness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we are all going to be sucked into a black hole

      Don't worry, CowboyNeal hasn't hit critical mass.

      Yet. :o)

    4. Re:Recursive dupeness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like there's a simple fix for all those posts - Have the ass-clowns they call "editors" earn their pay and not post duplicate articles.

      Unless they intentionally post dupes for increased page views.

    5. Re:Recursive dupeness by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Seems like there's a simple fix for all those posts

      Hmm. If it were so simple, it seems to me that it would have happened by now. After all, I see legions of posts complaining about dupes, but still they keep on coming.

      Have the ass-clowns they call "editors" earn their pay and not post duplicate articles.

      And what do we do about the ass-clown readers who post duplicate comments?

      Mod them down as redundant?

  30. MUSH had all that and more, for decades, for free by Azundris · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...so please tell me what the big deal is? Sure, the fact that it's a graphical rather than a textual "viewport" to the virtual world might appeal to some (it may also keep the bad spellers et al. away from the MUSHes, not necessarily a bad thing), but let's face it, the screenshots looked pathetic even to me, and I don't consider myself to be an overly visually-oriented person to begin with...

    To paraphrase, if you need a visual "crutch" for your imagination, this is sadly inadequate. If you don't, I fail to see what kind of value this service adds.

  31. Washington Post says ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic



    U.S. Decision On Iraq - How Policy Was Set

    By Glenn Kessler Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, January 12, 2003; Page A01
    On Sept. 17, 2001, six days after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush signed a 21/2-page document marked "TOP SECRET" that outlined the plan for going to war in Afghanistan as part of a global campaign against terrorism.
    Almost as a footnote, the document also directed the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq, senior administration officials said.
    The previously undisclosed Iraq directive is characteristic of an internal decision-making process that has been obscured from public view. Over the next nine months, the administration would make Iraq the central focus of its war on terrorism without producing a rich paper trail or record of key meetings and events leading to a formal decision to act against President Saddam Hussein, according to a review of administration decision-making based on interviews with more than 20 participants.
    Instead, participants said, the decision to confront Hussein at this time emerged in an ad hoc fashion. Often, the process circumvented traditional policymaking channels as longtime advocates of ousting Hussein pushed Iraq to the top of the agenda by connecting their cause to the war on terrorism.
    With the nation possibly on the brink of war, the result of this murky process continues to reverberate today: tepid support for military action at the State Department, muted concern in the military ranks of the Pentagon and general confusion among relatively senior officials -- and the public -- about how or even when the policy was decided.............

    Read the full article here - How U.S. Policy On Iraq Was Set

  32. I wonder... by netwalkr · · Score: 0

    if I can get dem air force ones..

  33. WorldsAway from compuserve by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a compuserve member way back when the internet was hard to get onto (you couldn't access the net from compuserve when I first signed up). They looked deep into my soul and gave me a number based upon the order in which I joined. About when they let me choose a screen name for myself (all_the_good_names_are_taken@compuserve.com I kid you not.) they introduced this thing called Worlds Away which seems eerily like "there."

    The keyword you typed at the go prompt was AWAY, so youd type GO: AWAY and be transported to a virtual world which had all the usuall compuserve anal retentive rules to keep everyone playing nice.

    I've since left compuserve due to the cost of access and the mountains of rules, but I did hear that worlds away has been replaced by a thing called Dreamscape.

    Everything that is old is new again.

    1. Re:WorldsAway from compuserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great to hear that there are fellow /.er's out there who used to use WorldsAway back in the good old Compuserve days! I practically grew up on WorldsAway and my parents footed a big monthly bill (well over $100 a month, and at the most $300.) On the other hand those large monthly costs ensured you where going to meet some very interesting people.

      I more or less left in 1999, although dropped in occasionally until my account expired (for some odd reason I wasn't being billed.)

      Is that first url yours? I knew quite a few former magnolytes such as Vicious Varla and maxxie, however they moved to other places (Ultima Online being a big one) and I haven't talked to them in years.

      My avatar name was Cutter. It was the only name I ever used from day one way back in October of 1996.

      WorldsAway is still around. What you won't see on that page is their "adult" world.

      Long before the sims you could decorate your "turf" which you paid a monthly rental fee for. With thousands of different items available (anything from a steaming cup to a full size coffin), the decorating possiblities where endless. You could buy trees, ferns, and flowers and literly turn your turf in to a forest. And on top of that it actually looked good! At the time most other places where 3D, and a quite a bit clunky and ugly at that. Worldsaway was originally created by Fujitsu, and its japanese counterpart, Habitat II, artwork was clearly anime/manga inspired.

      I miss those old days a whole lot. Its still around, but the people who made it good are all gone.

    2. Re:WorldsAway from compuserve by Catcher80 · · Score: 0

      also glad there are some /.'ers who remember the old days. I'm young yet, joined WA and started out in "Connect City" and I'm still in there, although now it's known as New Horizones. I liked the old ways better but things change and usually we can't do anything but accept them. Hey Cutter, I'm Catcher in nH (can't afford dreamscape) if you ever decide to come back. Seducity.... heh heh.. Everything else you say "all the good people are gone" is pretty true.. but there are still people in here :) Somebody might remember you lol :D

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    3. Re:WorldsAway from compuserve by OmniVector · · Score: 2

      Wow I didn't know any old WorldsAway people read Slashdot either.

      You might have remembered me as Tito.

      --
      - tristan
    4. Re:WorldsAway from compuserve by Catcher80 · · Score: 0

      How could I forget you, you were like, Orange everywhere dude, heh, why did you ever leave anyway? If you might remember me, the duck with the tie and red top hat and like, no one remembers me I know :D WHY DID YOU LEAVE! We need you back Tristan :D Everyone would love to see ya.. I'll AIM you sometime, I still have ya added but you're Idle

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
  34. Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll


    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by aiwi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the purpose of your post. Haven't you misheard the name? Wasn't it Maurice Gibb?

    2. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Leonard Nimoy.

    3. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Catcher80 · · Score: 0

      what? I google'd it and found this article about a man in Maine who was found dead in his mobile home; apparently he almost killed King by running him down with a car. I wouldn't listen to that radio show anymore...... heh

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    4. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Stephen+King · · Score: -1

      No, I'm not dead.

      --
      Karma: Undead.
  35. Open source mmorpg? by HeyBob! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is anyone developing a free to use mmorpg, maybe based on a p2p method? I pay enough monthly bills I don't want to pay a monthly fee just to play a game. I don't mind paying for the game though.

    I wonder if there's a way to build a mmorpg system that doesn't require central servers, but could exist on thousands of p2p machines. As pc's log on and off, the load is moved around. Sort of a combination of p2p and a distributed.net.

    Instead of servers slowing down with more people logging on, the game gets faster when more pc's log in and add their computing power.

    1. Re:Open source mmorpg? by jeremyds · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, but they would still probably have to charge a monthly fee. Even if you cut out the cost of the game servers and bandwith, you would still need developers, designers, customer support, etc.

    2. Re:Open source mmorpg? by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      Well I happen to be, but you won't like it. Its all in Visual Basic. We had given the thought of p2p design, but the answer after discussion was that it was impractical. By putting server function on the user end, there were too many trust issues. It would be too easy for people to hack their own information about how powerfull the characters are. Anyway, we are trying to use open and documented file formats and hopefully have a documented network protocol so that someday I can make a client software for other platforms, but right now the whole project is pretty much windows only. If I still haven't scared you off, check out our website

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    3. Re:Open source mmorpg? by HeyBob! · · Score: 1

      VB and Windows don't bug me! I looking forward to trying out your software.

      I had forgotten about the possiblities of cheating, since you would have a piece of the overall server.

      PS: You should run a spell checker through your site!

    4. Re:Open source mmorpg? by HeyBob! · · Score: 1

      you would still need developers, designers, customer support, etc.

      That's where the open-source would come in, although customer support would be tricky. It might take the form of a user forum instead of a 1-800 #.

      Early adopters would be the developers and designers. New users would d/l the client/server package and could just play or learn to add their own features which may or may not be taken up by the whole community.

    5. Re:Open source mmorpg? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the open source MMORPG Arianne. It's still in development, and not quite there yet, but it's quite actively developed. It doesn't use p2p, though, AFAIK.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:Open source mmorpg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but you play a penguin and and all you can do is slide down a track on your belly with other penguins. I get into great conversations with other folks who have the same devotion to open-source as myself...

      Me: Is this all we do? Slide down these tracks on our belly?

      AsInBeer: STFU noob...it's all about the open-source and the graphix r0x0r.

    7. Re:Open source mmorpg? by mlk · · Score: 1

      > although customer support would be tricky.
      Could do it in the same way as Linux, via pay-for distributions.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    8. Re:Open source mmorpg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Instead of servers slowing down with more people logging on, the game gets faster when more pc's log in and add their computing power.
      MMORPG slowdowns with additional players do not occur because the processing requirements increase, but because the network bandwidth requirements increase. A non-server-centric algorithm that does a good job of distributing network traffic and can dynamically adjust to accomodate the number of players in a given "area" would be a major advance.
    9. Re:Open source mmorpg? by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Cool :)
      btw, is that Ragnar from Rune redrawn by one of your artists? There's an image of him looking exactly like that on one of the old promotional images from Human Head.

    10. Re:Open source mmorpg? by markus_prime · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there's a way to build a mmorpg system that doesn't require central servers, but could exist on thousands of p2p machines. As pc's log on and off, the load is moved around.

      This is exactly how the Walled City from the book Idoru was run. The idea itself is quite inspiring. Kind of a utopia in some respects. To the extent that everyone in Walled City had to care about what was going on as they're all supporting the load. Because of this, it's a place where only otaku live.

    11. Re:Open source mmorpg? by riedquat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nearly all multiplayer games have rules - a multiplayer system without rules is just a glorified chat server. We expect the server to implement those rules, because we cannot trust the clients. You cannot trust the clients, because they may not be running the code you sent them unmodified and you wil not be able to tell. I can modify any code running on my PC, which makes it very easy for me to cheat.

      I wrote a paper on p2p multiplayer games for my Masters degree, and this was the major obstacle to p2p games I identified. There are ways around it, but competitive p2p games are a whole different world to cooperative p2p applications like file sharing.

    12. Re:Open source mmorpg? by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      You know I have no Idea where that image came from. I'll have to ask the webmaster.

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    13. Re:Open source mmorpg? by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      Seems like a distributed ass-kicking you off the game for not running the same code as the rest of world could handle it. You'd have to set up a central server system just to handle passing off new versions maybe? And if enough users were using cracked out rulesets then it's open source, let them.

      I think the idea would be to insure that each user could faithfully assure themselves that at least the people that they were playing with would be operating under the same sorts of rules assumptions as they were. I mean, I've sat for HOURS downloading the skins and maps required to play Unreal before and I was cool with that - but once AimBots started taking hold it just wasn't fun anymore.

      Perhaps the final solution would be limited open sourcing, change everything you want about this game except THIS part which makes sure that everyone is playing the same game. That way you could offer nice C&D letters on the basis of the evil DMCA to people who just _had_ to cheat.

      It would be nice to see something good come out of the damned thing.

  36. Well, sure, but by LiftOp · · Score: 1

    ...this seems like the same argument that was against television vs. books, and everyone knows TV is better than reading.

    1. Re:Well, sure, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed your smiley, or other hint that you were being tongue in cheek, must be the case, nobody could be such a fuckwit as to really believe that.

  37. Time Commitment? by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My big thing is with how much time commitment a "Virtual World" type game requires. I have never played any type of online static VW game, just things like Battle.net.

    My main reason for this is that it seems like the commitment is too great. It seems like one I play I have to keep playing everyday or else my previous effort isn't really useful, like I have to live a second life almost to make anything useful/fun out of the MMOG.

    I am currently playing Animal Crossing on the GCN, and while this game is ultimately experienced best if you play a little each day or for an hour or two on the weekends, Or both in my casse, I could stop playing for a while and nothing would go wrong or bad, I would be able to pick right back up. The same goes for the non MMOG Sims. From outside of MMOG it seems like I couldn't do this with those.

    Am I off base with my impressions of MMOG? Are there any that exhibit play whenever you want/can better than others without degrading the experience?

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Time Commitment? by aliens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry but the amount of time you have to put into these games is unreal. Where do the people who play these games find the time?

      On top of which I was listening to some talk radio and a girl called up to discuss why she enjoys Sims Online. Basically she stated she could do things she couldn't do in real life and as an example she said, "be outspoken." Really, come on, how bout just try to be outspoken in real life. Or has that become illegal?

      Things you can't do in real life should be things like drive a drive a Ferrari down the wrong side of the road at 110mph. That's what video games are for, not so you can be outspoken.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    2. Re:Time Commitment? by cmacb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      On-line gaming can indeed be an addictive passtime. But then so many other things can be too. If you don't change any other behavior and simply add several hours a day of on-line gaming you will probably at least suffer from sleep deprivation.

      What most people do however is give up some other activity. When I really got involved in this stuff a few years ago I stopped watching TV. First I simply watched less, then at some point I realized what a great waste of time my remaining TV watching was. Anyone who stops watching TV completely for a few months will be shocked at how awful most of it is when you tune back in.

      Both TV and movies of today are creations of other people. As you watch you are consuming, nothing more. At least with virtual reality there is usually some element of creativity involved.

      As far as being outspoken... if you communicate at all with people in real life as well as online (for example e-mail between you and people you actually meet in person) you will notice that the nature of the communication is different. Almost *everyone* is more outspoken online, whether it is e-mail, newsgroups, or SlashDot. People often express things in their personal web pages that they would be embarrassed to say to someone in person.

      You can in fact develop what might be called an alternate personality online. I'm not sure there is any evidence however that this second personality is any less "real" than your in-person one. In fact I think it might be a good bit *more* real (for better or worse).

      When it comes to work, as opposed to play, I'd *much* rather interact with people online than in person. The key element of this other than the liberating aspect of the interaction is that fact that everything is recorded. The worst managers I have ever had are the ones that go down the hall and pop into people's office or cubes for friendly little one-on-ones. These 5-minute-managers send their whole staff in different directions without knowing it.

      Real life meetings usually end up being chaotic unless they are planned in advance. Again, the key is to get things in writing, to produce meeting minutes, and when it comes design, make sure that everyone is on the same "page".

      I think that in the future online VR type interaction will replace many work interaction not because it is more fun, but because it works better.

    3. Re:Time Commitment? by wurp · · Score: 2

      You might check out Magicosm. Unfortunately, we're still more than a year away from a final release right now. We'll be having an alpha test soon; it should start in August.

      Part of what makes us different is that we allow a sort of casual play. Crafting takes significant time, hours or days, so you can queue up activities for offline work. You can monitor your character's progress by receiving email updates or by viewing a web page, and queue new actions in the same way. This means that while you may play almost every day, most days it can be by viewing a web page and queueing a few new actions, sending emails to people to bring you raw materials or tell you what they want crafted.

      Your character is controlled by a scripting language, so you can set him up to do whatever you think he's smart enough to do without getting himself killed, or use our preconstructed scripts to do the basics.

      Our goal is to create a complete working fantasy world... iron ore comes from the ground, not a guy on the street corner. Real crafting is done in a smithy, which player characters can own, rent out, whatever. Monsters are not your main source of experience, questing, dynamically generated or part of the storyline, is. It is often much better to avoid a monster if you can rather than fight it. Although, with our lore system, finding out how to do new things is often more important than gaining experience. You will have to learn to do new, more difficult tasks to continue advancing, and you will have to journey to someone to be trained in these new tasks.

      We have player run governments, manage your lands to increase resource production. All items (except a few relics) can be crafted. You can become the best at one or a few activities (say, making horseshoes of speed or dwarven axes, or opening enchanted locks) and thus well-known in your area. Skills atrophy slightly when not in use, and many skills have a maximum, so not even the most powerful characters can match you at something that you do every day. Hang out in taverns to get new quests, publish a newspaper... we're building a complete fantasy world, not the latest Everquest clone.

      Come see us. Check out the forums. Leave us a note to get back to you when we hit release time :) We've been at this for 2.5 years, so it's not some fly-by-night project.

    4. Re:Time Commitment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, smart one-a game like that is already around-Ultima online LBR.

  38. Re:No. Flat out. by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 1

    OT but, which one? I've been looking for a good one.

    MUDs are really in a different class as modern MMORPG, they attract a much smaller class of people. I'm sure only a small percentage of people who play a MMORPG have ever heard of MUDs, less played one, and less played one for a long time.

    This is, however, a Good Thing(TM), in most cases.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  39. Re:No. Flat out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...it was all being led by an unemployed welfare-supported hippie who wouldn't even recognize a "Bad Thing"(tm) if it hit him in the face at mach 2. Most of the players we're afraid to say anything and the few who did only droned out the words "I agree!" or something similiar to whatever ons of said administrators cried out in a fit of utter stupidity. That, and the basic idea of "You're not paying, so if you don't like it, go to hell." aren't very appealing to me.

    Wow! That is the best explanation of Free Software that I have ever heard!
  40. Getting a life, finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because now I know Where to get one...

  41. OS requirements by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "There" seems to require Windows.
    Too bad, they follow only that track.

    1. Re:OS requirements by milovoo · · Score: 1

      Yup, the boring majority, just the
      kind of people I DON"T want to talk to.

      -m

    2. Re:OS requirements by rplacd · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't be surprised if a Mac client showed up soon.

  42. They totally miss the point by fleener · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SimsOnline seems OK, but think ahead a few years to how the medium will evolve. The 'There' virtual universe is a snapshot of the screwed up world to come.

    We go from text chat where we can let down our social guard, be anything we want to be and let our imagination soar. SimsOnline moves us to cartoonish graphics, an OK bit of fun. The 'There' universe drags us backward to a social environment where we worry about our clothes, hair style, etc. Do I really want to manage two wardrobes?

    Virtual universes will naturally evolve into a photo-realistic environment some years from now. Do we want a fake universe in which we have all of today's worries? Yes, you might say, because our virtual lives can be better than our real lives.

    What does it mean when I enjoy my virtual life more than my real one?

    I'll spend my time using technologies that are not geared toward spending as much time as possible with that technology. What's the point? I enjoy healthier recreation offline.

    The Matrix missed the point as a social commentary. Machines won't need to take over the world and enslave us. We are willingly putting on the shackles and forgetting our real lives.

    1. Re:They totally miss the point by silicon_synapse · · Score: 2

      Hey, are you that guy I saw on the street the other day screaming something about the apocolypse and how the end is near?

    2. Re:They totally miss the point by praedor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      YOU miss the point. With a bunch of idiots living out their "lives" online in virtual worlds, that means fewer people to dick things up in the REAL world. Parks will become less crowded and polluted because a lot of the slobs will be pretending to me svelt hotties in a virtual world getting the babes, etc. They can even "enjoy" a virtual visit to a virtual park whilst you, me, and the few other sane people go to the REAL parks and see them as they used to be.


      This could be great. The more addictive the better, I say, wrt these "games". I WANT to be able to go camping again and not run into a family of fatsos 10 meters away in their trailer (with TV and VCR). To hear the breeze again, hear birds chirping, water tinkling instead of boom boxes and loud drunken gatherings around the campfire in the next door campsite.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    3. Re:They totally miss the point by fleener · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your point raises more problems. All these virtual geeks will spend so much time online, they'll have no jobs. We'll pay while they're on welfare, including their monthly Internet access and gaming fees.

    4. Re:They totally miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      Troll.

    5. Re:They totally miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I refuse to. Let them die.

    6. Re:They totally miss the point by Paolomania · · Score: 1

      ...which means they are not rioting out in the streets. panne et MMORPG circus

    7. Re:They totally miss the point by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

      That would only happen in a perfect world.

    8. Re:They totally miss the point by Lt+Razak · · Score: 1

      Or in a virtual world....

    9. Re:They totally miss the point by Slurpee · · Score: 1


      I WANT to be able to go camping again and not run into a family of fatsos 10 meters away in their trailer (with TV and VCR).


      Get real, go camping for real. if you are only willing to camp where you can drive a vehicle, expect other idiots to camp near you.

  43. My first MMORPG... by PKFC · · Score: 1

    ...will be Final Fantasy XI. I just hope that there will be less morons online with the added cost of the game. Until the PC version is released *sigh*

    If somehow FFXI doesn't make it here, .hack will be my first MMORPG ;P

    --
    My Moderator points just disappeared when I was using them. It says "Use them or lose them", not "Use them and lose them" *sigh*

  44. Typical Male by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Karma: Chameleon Shouldn't that be: Karma: Typical male

    Typical male? Only if you're a Tina Turner fan.

  45. Burning Chrome? by f64 · · Score: 1

    wasn't there a scene in burning chrome where people who met in cyberspace rented clothes for their avatars?
    gibson should've taken out a patent...

    f64 : making crack remarks while on crack

    1. Re:Burning Chrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Idoru, actually.

    2. Re:Burning Chrome? by markus_prime · · Score: 1

      To be specific, it was when Chia was going through the formal introductions with the Lo/Rez Japanese fan club that she rented some clothes. When she entered the walled city, she was merely a ghost like prescence IIRC. Makes sense as she's not helping to support the load of rendering her in a higher resolution.

  46. What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What the fuck CmdrTaco? You got a wife but you like to spend your time in some fucking fantasy world! Perhaps some other man will show your wife what fun a man and woman can do together.

  47. Re:No. Flat out. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    Not quite what I mean though... :P

    PS, be manly (or girly... Hey, it's 2003!) and don't use AC :)

  48. Possibilities for Marketing over THERE by Brain$torm · · Score: 1

    "name There and their opening"

    Hehehehe, love the use of there you got goin there.

    The sheer possibilities for marketing here are amazing - I used to play a game called Diaspora run by a company called Altitude (a cloan of it can now be found at http://www.rillaspora.com). Basically a space-trading game,the company was trying to sell advert space in the online bars I believe. They failed.

    You could have a virtual McDonalds, Starbucks, and then have virtual anti-capitalists to break the windows in Starbucks whilst ordering a latte.

    And how long before the citizens of the virtual community have their own computers and networks? Imagine - virtual LAN parties! woohoo!

  49. Re:No. Flat out. by Gropo · · Score: 2

    Yet if you were a 14 year old British girl, you might appreciate Habbo Hotel (Shock Req.)

    Were you a Finnish (Suomi) teen, you might appreciate Hotelli Kultakala (Shock Req.)

    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  50. And more importantly by The+Creator · · Score: 2

    Can you kill someone for a pair?

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
    1. Re:And more importantly by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      In the same vein, is the gun you use to murder someone's avatar for his Nike's manufactured by Glock?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  51. Think of the potential sponsorships... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the virtual world, eating McDonalds hamburgers COULD be good for you! Just imagine - If McDonalds paid the GMs for the priviledge, eating at a virtual McD's would increase all your stats 10% for a few hours after ever meal. Using Colgate toothpaste really would make you better looking. And if your sim drinks Bud Light, your sim really would become irresistable to the opposite sex for a few hours!

    This has potential even in games like Ultma Online, where wearing Levis under your armour might convey you some mild form of magical protection. Wearing Nike's lets your character run 10% faster. Just think of the possibilities...

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Think of the potential sponsorships... by mzo23 · · Score: 1

      Just a note, there IS mcdonalds in Sims online...

      --
      I don't have a sig, can I borrow yours?
  52. Not till its open and Customizable by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    The day I can log in to a non-proprietary virtual network, and I can build my own software/avatars or create my own code to provide interactions, is the day I'll play one of those damn addictive things... I don't just want to play, I want to create little bot-avatars that can go do things for me.

    --
    meh
  53. Windows only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So CmdrTaco runs windows? Shock horror!

  54. Time for a nice Movie quote! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    "300 dollars a week. That's the news, for 300 lousy dollars a week. --'Why?' I ask myself. 'Why have I put up with you?' I can't imagine. But I know. It's Fear. Yellow Freakin' Fear. I've been too chicken shit afraid to live my life, so I sold it to you for 300 dollars a week! You're lucky I don't kill you!"

    --Joe, "Joe v.s. the Volcano"


    Except this way, people are actually paying. But that's the way, isn't it? Corporate evil is nothing if not efficient, (in all the 'right' places, at any rate). Render them impotent, trick them into living in bullshit misery and debt-ridden servitude, then sell them a subscription to some lame version of 'escape'.

    "Oh, and Smithers, tell our engineers to make it highly addictive."

    "Yes sir. The people will know what hit them, but they won't care."


    -Fantastic Lad

  55. Requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im not virtually cool enough to have a machine that will 'play/run' there software

  56. Right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Coke has a system that is kinda like the sims online, or this thing, except very basic and majorly endorsing coke. Pretty much you go around various locations and people's studios (you can set up your own and buy stuff for it to make it all nice and pretty) and drink coke and stuff, as well as talk to people and customize your appearance. Interesting stuff, it's kinda like super basic sims... With coke!

    www.cokemusic.com

    It's stuff like that that's been keeping me alive until the sims online gets into my price range...

  57. What about any open-source ORPG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest, I'd settle for any open-source RPG at this point.

    I really like Neverwinter Nights, but was disappointed in its third-person perspective.

    I really like Morrowind, but am pissed off that there's no multiplayer component.

    I believe if one could create a first-person CRPG that could be extended easily by users--not developers--to create modules, I think it would be fairly successful.

    That's not to say that I don't think NWN is worth paying for, it's just that there's something compelling to me about doing a open-source first-person RPG with module-creation toolsets.

    I'd work on it, but I just don't have the programming experience to undertake such a venture. I know next to nothing about game programming.

  58. The War On Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    To American Youth on the Eve of War
    by Kevin Alfred Strom

    American Dissident Voices Broadcast of January 11, 2003

    Welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Kevin Alfred Strom.

    Today's program is for you, the sons and brothers and young fathers of
    America. It is a message to the young men being asked to die for their
    country in the upcoming war on Iraq being planned by our enemies.
    America's sons -- and I have two sons who will be of "military age" in
    the next decade, so I have a personal stake in this -- are being
    manipulated into becoming cannon fodder for Israel in the most sickening
    display of hypocritical moralizing cant that I have ever witnessed in my
    life. Today's program is for you, my sons. I don't want you to die. And
    I don't want you to be hired killers.

    The politicos, like Boy George Bush, who speak of "patriotism" and
    "defending America's freedom" are all either knowing cynical liars or
    psychopaths who can program themselves on some level to actually believe
    their own Jewish speechwriters.

    A few days ago president Bush spoke to 4,000 young soldiers at Fort Hood
    in Texas. He broadly hinted that the second report from the weapons
    inspectors in Iraq, due on the 27th of this month, will signal an
    American invasion. His advance knowledge of the contents of a report
    that hasn't yet been written is even more amazing than his instant
    analysis of the inspectors' earlier 12,000-page report which he declared
    contained "proof" of Iraqi violations of UN decrees almost the instant
    it was issued. One can be sure that Bush and his overseers have decided
    in advance that there will be some pretext for war, whether the
    inspectors actually find anything or not. Bush's handlers are now
    floating the idea of Bush's declaring this new crusade during his State
    of the Union speech, to be delivered the day after the inspectors'
    report is due to be released. An unnamed "senior administration
    official" was quoted by the Washington Post last week as saying that
    Saddam Hussein's "time will have run out" on that very day. U.S.
    ambassadors have just been instructed to request help from their host
    countries during the planned occupation of Iraq. No presidential travel
    at all has been scheduled for February. [Washington Post, January 4th,
    2003]

    And American troops are massing in the Persian Gulf region. 60,000 are
    now acknowledged to be there, a number that is expected to double in the
    next few weeks. Unless something happens to upset the Jewish war plans,
    the number that will return will certainly be a smaller one. Not only
    will Americans be killed in the war, but many more will become victims
    of terrorism at home as outrage against the American invasion and
    occupation -- and American support of Israeli genocide -- and American
    support of puppet governments -- boils over in the increasingly Third
    World and increasingly Moslem population of our homeland. Not only will
    Americans be killed in the war, but as we become more and more of a
    garrison state in response to terrorism and perpetual war for
    perpetually elusive peace -- as we become more and more like our
    masters, the Israelis -- we will also kill the freedom that made America
    worth defending and life here worth living and which our race needs for
    its healthy development. I don't want America to become another Israel.
    I don't want my sons to die needlessly. I don't want the murder and
    enslavement of whole populations on my conscience, and I don't want to
    pay for them with my taxes. I don't want this war. My sons, you are
    being lied to by your leaders. You are being tricked into betraying
    America under the guise of "patriotism."

    I have absolutely no attachment to Saddam Hussein or Iraq (in fact I
    think we of the White West need to be ever vigilant against incursions
    from the Arab/Moslem world), but the media hoopla and politicians'
    double-talk which designates Hussein as some kind of threat to America
    or exemplar of "evil" is ridiculous. His regime has surrendered and
    bowed down to U.S. and U.S.-engineered U.N. demands for over a decade.
    How many other countries agree to limit their weapons development to
    what a hostile foreign state decides is allowable? How many other
    countries agree that foreign states may decide where their planes may
    and may not fly over their own sovereign territory? How many other
    countries have peacefully accepted an embargo that even their enemies
    concede has resulted in the deaths of about half a million of their
    children? How many other countries have been willing to let enemy agents
    talk publicly with their top weapons scientists? Iraq's submission after
    its defeat and the mass incineration of its retreating troops in 1991
    has been almost total. Yet it is slated for destruction, occupation, and
    the installation of a puppet regime. Why?

    1. By Middle Eastern standards, Iraq is a large, advanced, and powerful
    country. It is located near Israel. This in itself makes it a potential
    threat to Israeli domination of that region.

    2. Even though Iraq is a secular state and the government there
    generally dislikes, distrusts, and disapproves of Islamic
    fundamentalism, it is naturally sympathetic to the plight of the
    oppressed Palestinians, to whom it is tied by blood and religion. This
    also makes it a potential threat in Israeli eyes.

    3. The attacks of September 11th, 2001 provide a pretext for war against
    all of Israel's enemies. The Jews want to use 9/11 for all it's worth
    and make war against those they see as even potential future threats as
    soon as possible, while American dislike of Moslems is high and the
    memory of the World Trade Center attack is still fresh. There's a lot of
    evidence that Israeli intelligence knew of 9/11 in advance and did
    nothing, or possibly even influenced events to make it happen, knowing
    of the tremendous propaganda victory it would be in getting Americans
    pepped up to kill Arabs.

    4. The Jewish media and the lapdog politicians tested the ignorance and
    gullibility of Americans with the war in Afghanistan. First, they
    transferred the blame for the attacks from Osama Bin Laden to the
    government of Afghanistan, which had nothing to do with the 9/11
    attacks, on the pretext that that's where Osama, a Saudi, was living at
    the time. When Afghanistan refused to waive all of its laws when
    American Jews commanded them to do so, Afghanistan was attacked,
    invaded, and a puppet government friendly to Jewish interests and
    well-oiled by American dollars was installed. Now that they have seen
    how easily the American public can be buffaloed into thinking that any
    "camel jockey" (as long as he lives outside the U.S.) is an enemy of Mom
    and Apple Pie and is somehow to blame for the recent terror attacks on
    American soil, why not take the even more absurd step of claiming that
    destroying one of Israel's biggest worries is somehow part of a "fight
    against terrorism." Never mind that there is not a molecule of evidence
    that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. Never mind that the current
    Iraqi government loathes Islamic fundamentalism, which it regards as its
    adversary for political power in the Moslem world. Never mind that Iraq
    had and has no use for Bin Laden or the Taliban. All that is irrelevant.
    "Camel jockeys" knocked down our buildings. That's all that matters. The
    media spinmeisters do the rest. If there is still some steam in the
    misled and misdirected American "patriots" after the body bags start
    arriving, you may be sure that Iraq will not be the last victim of this
    9/11 sting operation. The leaders of Iran and Saudi Arabia better be
    making some serious contingency plans.

    Ladies and gentlemen, this alleged "war on terror" of which the war on
    Iraq is a part promises to be a war without a clearly definable goal, a
    war without end. It promises to be a world war. It promises power to the
    Jews who, they believe, will crush their enemies and steal their oil
    billions, with a few billion crumbs for their gentile collaborators like
    the Bush dynasty. But it also promises years if not decades of
    unprecedented death and destruction, and huge costs in blood and money
    to my people, the White working people of the West, who will gain
    absolutely nothing by it. (Even establishment think tanks admit that the
    direct costs of war may top $200 billion, and the total economic costs
    may be five times that -- one thousand billion dollars. [Washington
    Post, December 1st, 2002]) This is, perhaps, the most unjust of all wars
    and we must not support it.

    The propaganda leaflets are already falling on Iraq. The bombs have been
    falling on Iraq for many months now, with the repeated justification
    that Iraqis have somehow violated the "no fly" zone or that they had the
    temerity to turn on their radar when foreign warplanes were surging
    across their skies. In reality, the war on Iraq has already started. It
    is the actual invasion that is about to begin.

    I recently drove across about half of this continent, and as I did so, I
    got to listen to a lot of commercial broadcast radio. All over the dial
    are so-called "conservatives" frothing at the mouth for this war, a war
    that will kill innocents and harm America. A war that will benefit only
    the Jews. A war that will instill a hatred of America in the hearts of
    many future generations in the Moslem and Arab world, a hatred that
    could be healed if we stop this madness now. And all over the radio
    dial, at a far higher density than a few months ago, were announcements
    urging teenage boys to register for the Selective Service. That reminded
    me of you, my sons. Thinking of you inspired me to speak out.

    Recently, a group of actors of various political persuasions called
    Artists United to Win Without War issued an interesting statement. They
    stated that they are under pressure now to make war movies, and they
    resent that pressure.[The Washington Times, December 14th, 2002] Cable
    and satellite movie channels have been engaging in a riot of recycled
    war movies, many of them dusty propaganda pieces from World War II. I
    was astounded one day as I reviewed the schedule of Turner Classic
    Movies over the holiday season and found that, instead of the seasonal
    classics you'd expect to see at that time of year, the majority of the
    films that day were war movies and war propaganda short subjects. And
    other channels, owned or controlled by the same ethnic interests, are
    marching in lockstep.

    Country music artists have issued songs celebrating war, and even
    proudly flaunting the ignorance of the singer who, he says, can't tell
    the difference "between Iraq and Iran," but clearly implying that he'll
    kill anyone Bush -- and by extension Bush's Jewish owners -- tells him
    to kill.

    My sons, that is an ignorant mentality. I do not want you to be
    ignorant. I do want you to see the hypocrisy of those who claim to be
    champions of human rights and freedom engaging in a slaughter of people
    who have never harmed the United States of America. And I want you to
    notice that none except one of the Congressmen who voted to give Bush
    his "war powers" has a son in the enlisted ranks of the military. Most
    of all, I want you to look at the behavior of those who are the cause of
    all this war and conflict -- Israel and the Jewish world power behind
    Israel.

    Is it Saddam Hussein's government that brazenly shoots reporters who
    dare to report stories the government doesn't like? No, it's Israel:
    according to the Foreign Press Association, no fewer than twenty
    reporters have been fired on by Israeli soldiers while doing their jobs
    and reporting on the Israeli response to the Palestinian uprising. A
    group of journalists called Reporters Without Boundaries stated that
    Israeli Defense Forces had shot forty reporters over a three-year
    period. Amazing -- and telling -- isn't it? And doubly amazing that the
    media don't choose to highlight this story when their own employees are
    being attacked. [Ha'aretz, May 25th, 2001; Reporters Without Boundaries,
    May 15th, 2001]

    What country in the Middle East uses Christian schoolchildren as human
    shields? Iraq? No -- again, it's Israel. According to the San Diego
    Union-Tribune of August 31st, 2001, Israeli troops invaded a Lutheran
    school in the Palestinian village of Beit Jallah, using the roof of the
    school -- with the children inside -- as a base for weapons fire and
    military operations against the people of the town. The Lutheran World
    Federation protested, the pastor of the church and his bishop protested.
    But did you hear about it? Was it on the nightly news? Was it on page
    one? Were the talk hosts telling you about this outrage? Were the
    Christian radio preachers telling their flocks about this outrage
    against Christian children by the Jews? You can be sure that if this was
    Iraqi soldiers doing this, it would have been page one material, and
    another warrant for war. But no -- the Jews are always innocent, and
    their crimes are not to be emphasized or highlighted in any way. It's
    sinful to criticize them.

    What Middle Eastern country murders children who violate curfew laws? Is
    it Iraq and its wicked dictator Saddam Hussein? No. It's Israel. The
    Jerusalem Post admitted on last October 16th that in only four months
    fifteen Palestinians were summarily killed for mere curfew violations --
    and that twelve of the fifteen, 80 per cent., were children.

    Who recently openly endorsed torture as a political weapon, on "60
    Minutes" no less? Was it Moslem extremists, or Saddam Hussein and his
    minions, exposed for what they really are on national TV? No, it was
    Jewish attorney and militant Zionist Alan Dershowitz, who once defended
    O. J. Simpson. Dershowitz has the gall to claim to be a defender of
    human rights while not only endorsing the admitted Israeli policy of
    torturing prisoners who are captured without charge or trial or hope of
    a trial, but who also wants to bring such blatantly unconstitutional
    practices to the United States of America. Dershowitz wants judges to be
    able to issue "torture warrants" and authorize the insertion of metal
    needles under the fingernails and similar practices which cause
    "excruciating pain" to people who have never even been convicted of a
    crime. Creatures like Dershowitz have no right to call themselves
    Americans or live under the protection of our laws and our fighting men.
    Most emphatically they do not deserve to have a single drop of American
    blood shed to protect them. [CBS News, January 17th, 2002; Jewish World
    Review, January 30th, 2002]

    What religious denomination has within its ranks prominent advocates of
    the extermination of other racial and religious groups? Is it the Moslem
    clerics in Iraq, or unrepentant chaplains of the former Taliban? Is it
    the most wacko of the Christian fundamentalists on an anti-Semitic
    spree? No -- it's a Jewish rabbi in (surprise, surprise) Israel.
    According to the Palestine Chronicle of November 16th:

    "A prominent Israeli rabbi with thousands of followers said during a
    Sabbath homily in the settlement in Kiryat Arba'a Saturday that halacha,
    or Jewish religious law, 'essentially supported the annihilation of
    non-Jews in Israel.' The rabbi, Rav Leor, said most rabbinic authorities
    'of the past and the present accepted the opinion that the lives of
    non-Jews don't' enjoy the same sanctity as the lives of Jews.'
    'Hashmadat goyem' (the extermination of non-Jews), he said was an
    established principle in Jewish theology. The rabbi is affiliated with
    the messianic Jewish movement known as Gush Emunim which is represented
    in the Israeli Knesset by seven Knesset members. The movement is
    represented in the Israeli government by Minister without portfolio Ed
    Eifam of the National Religious Party."

    That should give you the measure of this people, the Jews, who ask you
    to lay down your lives to destroy their enemies. It should also give you
    the measure of the mass media in America who do not report or grossly
    underplay the outrages of Israel and of the Jewish establishment which
    largely controls these media.

    I could go on for a hundred programs about the hypocrisy and genocidal
    agenda of the Jewish establishment. I could detail for you the Israeli
    advocacy of summary state murder of the innocent family members of
    accused terrorists. I could document Israel's admitted policy of
    assassinating political leaders they don't like. I could show you that
    Israel has violated far more U.N. resolutions than Iraq. I could show
    you that Israel has the greatest cache of illegal weapons of mass
    destruction in the Middle East, and that they are openly producing
    nuclear weapons in violation of agreements with the United States, and
    that, by law, all U.S. aid to Israel should be cut off because of this
    nuclear weapons production. I could recount hundreds of grisly massacres
    of innocent women and children by Israeli soldiers. I could show you how
    Israel killed American sailors and tried to blame it on the Arabs in the
    USS Liberty incident. I could tell you about Israel's brutal invasion
    and occupation of Lebanon, which lasted for twenty years and contrast
    our reaction to that to our reaction to Iraq's annexation of Kuwait.

    My sons, I hope I have told you enough to spur you on to find out more
    for yourselves. The information is there for those who would seek it. It
    is in libraries, it is on the Internet which still remains free in 2003,
    and it can be found on the growing number of radio programs like this
    one which dare to break away from Jewish media censorship. I hope you
    will be careful, but I also hope that you will exercise your rights to
    the fullest legal extent to protect yourselves and the next generation
    of our people from participating in or helping in any way this obscene
    war that they are trying to start against Iraq. I hope you will not only
    oppose this war, but use whatever position of trust and responsibility
    you may hold to educate our people to oppose and confound the plans of
    the warmongers. I urge you to make friendly contact with White
    nationalists and urge them to join us in the National Alliance, and make
    plans to continue your contacts even if, in the future, the Internet is
    shut down or censored. I urge you to reach understandings with
    nationalists of other nations and even races so that the Jewish
    establishment's agenda of war and race-mixing and genocide may one day
    be defeated and a brighter day will dawn on planet Earth.

  59. Virtual Nikes & Levis by jaeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the key element is that you can buy virtual Levis and Nikes for your Avatar.

    Are these items made in virtual sweatshops by virtual children for virtually nothing just like in real life?

  60. Uh oh... by zapod4 · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon the mafia will be delivering pizzas.

  61. Post columnist asks: Will Women Go There? by rhwalker22 · · Score: 1

    Washington Post technology columnist Leslie Walker writes about There in her column today. Excerpt: It's meant to be a destination where people can do lots of things -- race dune buggies, fly on hoverboards, flirt, hang out with their dogs -- but it has no defined objectives. "There" offers tools for people to create their own worlds and virtual lifestyles. The company also hopes to make money licensing its tools to other companies such as ski resorts to create their own virtual environments."

    1. Re:Post columnist asks: Will Women Go There? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      You can't have such a thing succeed without objectives.

      I know of 'hang-out' virtual places, which to some extent don't have objectives, but in every case you have two additional factors:

      (1) personas you can't have in real life. In one place, I'm an anthropomorphic cat, just to be one. If you're offering a persona a person can't be in real life that's a kind of objective.

      (2) sex. (mreeeow!) *G* now that's an objective.

      No freaking way will this fly, if you can't have sex, or transform into strange creative personas, or do anything besides the boring consumerism you're already expected to do in real life. It's gonna fail unless it learns this.

  62. Hat Trick! by daves · · Score: 1

    Come on CmdrTaco, that's two dupes you've posted on today's front page... go for the hat-trick!

    He has a third one for today!

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
  63. I AGREE WITH THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant
  64. Depends... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    ...on whether you're playing the rich white American or the 3rd world shoemaker ;)

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  65. what happened to Alphaworld? by DeprecatedFeature · · Score: 1

    as a pathetic and rural computer weenie, i long for a virtual universe like the ones i read about; i read neal stephenson and dream of living at least part time in a nonreal world. yes, i go to parks and hike, but how great would it be to be able to do stuff at 200am without having to drive 4 hrs to a city? There looks like another disguised shopping mall, unfortunately. damn. i'll probably be dead by the time the goods are finally available.

    --
    maybe one day i'll be smart enough to come up with a cool sig, too.
  66. Re:No. Flat out. by Kerthale · · Score: 1

    I played Anarchy Online once, I pretty much had to convince myself that I had to quit. MMORPGs are just way to addictive. I've heard stuff about Everquest that it was pretty addictive too. People should learn how to not overdo such things. I mean, if you play 10+ hours a day, that can't be good...

  67. interface neutral environment? by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    I think it would be cool to have some sort of "interface nuetral" environment, where the client does all the all the hard work - for himself and maybe for others.

    That way, maybe my interface would be all text - and someone else could have this amazing 3d immersive environment, but the same events happen for us both.

    Also, say I have this amazing 3d stuff going on - I might give another's client the option of having me render the stuff for them, if I have all this amazing hardware - that way I can appear to be really amazing to people who don't even have the kind of hardware to see my avatar (or landscape or whatever) the way I want it to be seen.

    Read Snowcrash by Neil Stephenson.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  68. Well said. And I would like to add, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe.

    It's a dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe dupe.

    It's a dupe.

    It's a dupe dupe dupe.

    It's a dupe.

    It's a dupe.

    Thank you.

    (This post beat the zlib filter thanks to the letters 'W', "K" and {Q} ).

  69. Open source games with easy editors. by eniu!uine · · Score: 1

    One thing you wouldn't need to worry about with open source games as long as you have an easy editor is content. There are plenty of people out there who aren't technically oriented who could use an editor to create cool story lines and adventures. It wouldn't be unlike paper roll playing games where you buy modules, except you wouldn't be paying for the modules.

  70. Re:No. Flat out. by boomer_rehfield · · Score: 1

    correction...people that find are addicted should learn not to overdo such things... sounds like you have some exerience.

    --
    Carpe Canem - Seize the Dog
  71. Yes. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a project called Worldforge that has some interesting things going on. You may want to check it out.

    I've heard rumors that they want to implement P2P for the game media, but not for the game itself.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  72. Re:No. Flat out. by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Insightful


    and why exactly did you bother playing this MUD to begin with??

  73. Re:No. Flat out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Linux. The Linux kernel developers were about as corrupt as an average politician and it was all being led by an unemployed welfare-supported hippie who wouldn't even recognize a "Bad Thing"(tm) if it hit him in the face at mach 2. Most of the users we're afraid to say anything and the few who did only droned out the words "I agree!" or something similiar to whatever ons of said administrators cried out in a fit of utter stupidity. That, and the basic idea of "You're not paying, so if you don't like it, go to hell." aren't very appealing to me.

  74. The difference betwen There and Sims by MBoffin · · Score: 1

    There is not a game. Sims is. There is designed to be more like 3D IRC.

  75. I'm personally hoping for this MMORPG... by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    PlaneShift

    Check out the screenshots. :-)
    And it's FREE, too. ;-)

    Let's hope it turns out to be as fun to play as it looks, and that it becomes well-known enough. :-/

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:I'm personally hoping for this MMORPG... by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Oh, forgot to add (doh):

      "Support for nearly all platform (Windows 32-bit, Unix, GNU/Linux, Macintosh, Amiga, BeOS, NextStep, OpenStep, Rhapsody and OS/2)"

      But it's these kind of things that become vaporware, isn't it? Sure - they have an alpha client done, but I see far too often such ambitious projects like this one stopping at alpha/beta stage.

      Anyone, I visit the site now and then. One can hope they get something more to show off than what's essentially a "technology preview"

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:I'm personally hoping for this MMORPG... by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Nice screenshots, but when I downloaded the game and connected to the test server, my character was trapped in a box and couldn't explore the world. What gives??

  76. huh? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    .hack is not an actual mmorpg and will be released in the US next month, well before FFXI

    Or maybe you were joking and I look like a dumbass now...

  77. The only decent MMORPG out there now...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    neocron
    www.neocron.com

    the first 1st person mmorpg out there... with amazing graphics and a flurry of social orders and clans....

    its beautiful...
    only downside is that it also costs a monthly fee....

    why do they try to milk people so... i am not a holstein....

  78. Slashdot Charisma Shop by JackZ · · Score: 1
    This is Jack's wife. He tells me about this article and I immediately retire a sim in another city and dash as fast as my simness will allow to Mt Fuji, breathless in anticipation of possibly meeting CmdrTaco. Sweetie, there aint no sweat in your Shop. The name of the lot I found is Slashdot Charisma Shop. Oh the angst, the elevated blood pressure, and severe depression I am now experiencing for missing an opportunity to meet ya. Nice coconuts btw.

    Rabbit, wife of JackZ
    JaxBuni in Alphaville
    Rabbit in Blazing Falls
    Rabbbit in Mt Fuji

  79. Frogstar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a public beta for their 'Virtual Universe'

    Cool! I wonder if they'll have the Frogstar?

    Note to self: Don't exit through the door!

  80. Great idea! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    I'm going to sign-up and hang out my shingle selling car-poons. :-D

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  81. Re:No. Flat out. by (trb001) · · Score: 2

    Not to nitpick, because I agree with most of your post, but I don't think I'd be able to recognize *anything* that hit me in the face at Mach 2...

    --trb

  82. Re:No. Flat out. by Kierthos · · Score: 1

    I started playing MUDs in college, and when EQ came out, it was promptly dismissed by about 90% of the MUDders I knew. I mean, after all, we were playing online games for free... why would anyone ever pay a monthly fee to play these things?

    Addiction. That pretty much sums it up. About a month after "Ruins of Kunark" came out, one of my friends let me play it on his account for about 15 minutes. Hooked, reeled in, and gutted. I got my own account some time later, and was stuck there for about a year. Sheesh, do I regret that loss of time and money.

    Of course, I still play online games, but nothing to the point of addiction that I had with EQ.

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  83. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    The wise programmer is told about the Tao and follows it. The average
    programmer is told about the Tao and searches for it. The foolish programmer
    is told about the Tao and laughs at it. If it were not for laughter, there
    would be no Tao.
    The highest sounds are the hardest to hear. Going forward is a way to
    retreat. Greater talent shows itself late in life. Even a perfect program
    still has bugs.
    -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...