Slashdot Mirror


CPU Convective Water Cooling

biso writes "The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is here analyzed and experimented with positive results. Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink."

33 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. /. effect by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's going to be boiling noodles in a minute

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:/. effect by killthiskid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just impressed with a big bowl of water balanced on top of a open tower case. Now THAT takes balls.

      The guy obviously doesn't have cats or any other pets.

    2. Re:/. effect by Kronovohr · · Score: 5, Funny

      <offtopic>That reminds me -- a few years ago, I went out of town for a few days, and when I got back my old P200 refused to boot. I yanked out cables and cards in an attempt to get the old beast up and going again, and when I yanked out the sound card, it booted. Well, I put everything back together, and then looked closer at the sound card.

      It had a nice, dried puddle of mouse piss on it, so I put it aside and waited for the next opportunity to grab another one.


      I thought (after I'd gotten another one) that I should have called Dell tech support and discussed the problem with them:



      (them) "Hello, <speil>"

      (me) "Yeah, I've got a mouse problem."

      (them) "What seems to be the problem?"

      (me) "Oh, it sort of pissed on my sound card."
      </offtopic>
  2. odd by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ok, i can see the extra bit of silence from not having a pump would be nice. but ... isnt a bowl of water on top of your computer just asking for trouble? something tells me this guy doesnt have cats.

    1. Re:odd by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's more than one way to boil a cat I guess....

  3. not that complex... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've built numerous different water cooled systems, and the $20 pump from the aquarium supply place is NOT the most complex piece. A good waterjacket for the cpu is by far the most complex and generally most expensive single piece, and also the one that is most critical for good performance. Still need the waterjacket in this design, so it isn't really saving anything...

    1. Re:not that complex... by jasonkohles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure it is, he says right out he didn't eliminate the pump because it was the most expensive part, he wanted to eliminate it because it was the loudest part.

    2. Re:not that complex... by havardi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly; it's a moving part. When computers have absolutely no moving parts... well, that will be nice.

  4. Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's cheap, reliable, odorless and environmentally friendly, and refills are available everywhere. I myself have been using a 78% nitrogen gas mixture at 14.7 PSI to cool all my computer components for years now. Where did I get the idea? I guess I just pulled it out of thin *SMACK*

  5. too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really think that phase change cooling systems are the future of the PC. Only with phase change cooling systems do you get high quality cooling able to remove the utmost heat away from a CPU and cool it to below freezing.

    I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

    With these considerations passive water cooling is only a good first step and bound to be insufficient, even over the short term.

    1. Re:too hot by havardi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just thinking thinking about the same system he has setup-- but where the water is boiled off the chip into steam... If it could be totally sealed that would hella cool. Of course, it would have to be large. But, you could add plants and simple animals to the ecosystem and it would be an interesting conversational piece

    2. Re:too hot by PsychoKiller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

      Not quite true. I saw the same graph, and it was an extrapolation of current trends.

      Obviously we aren't going to emit more heat/area than a nuclear reaction, something is going to have to change in the design of Intel CPUs.

  6. Content of the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Abstract

    The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is analyzed and experimented with positive results.
    Introduction

    Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used.

    My intent was instead to build a cooler able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink, but without the annoying noise of the fan.

    A first prototype was built out of a regular heatsink. Holes were drilled in the aluminium finning, and copper tubes passed through them. An aquarium pump provided the necessary pressure for circulation.

    Figure 1. First Prototype--Front View
    (picture)
    Figure 2. First Prototype--Side View
    (picture)

    The system was silent and reliable. But with bigger pipes and a lower pressure drop would it have been possible to take away the pump? Simple calculations showed that it would have been perhaps feasible and a prototype was built.
    Temperature on Heatsink Surface

    Roughly:

    Power to be dissipated: powd = 80 W

    If the heatsink is a little copper box to put over the CPU, a reasonable value for the surface available at copper-water interface can be: surfc = 0.01 m2

    The heat transfer coefficient on the water-copper boundary layer can vary from a few watt per square meter per kelvin if the flow is slow and laminar to more than 1 kW K-1m-2 when the flow is very fast and turbulent. If the coefficient is supposed to be: texc = 100 W K-1m -2

    The difference of temperature on surface will be: delt = powd / (texc surfc) = 80 K

    It appears that the water should boil on the surface of such a little heatsink, but radiation wasn't taken into account and the geometry of the box is complex, so it's not clear if there could be turbulence and with which effect. If necessary the surface could be enhanced with fins or by increasing the dimension of the equipment.
    Convection

    Supposing that the heatsink could be able to exchange the heat between the CPU and the water, would it flow through the pipes?

    Power to convey: powd = 80 W

    Length of the circuit branches between the CPU and the radiator on the top of the computer case: heigh = 0.8 m

    Equivalent length of the circuit (we take into account the bends too): len = 2 m

    Radius of the pipe: rdp = 9 10-3 m

    Rate of change of water density against temperature: dct = 0.55 kg m-3 K -1

    Water density: rho = 103 kg m-3

    Water viscosity: eta = 10-3 decapoise

    Specific heat of water: wsh = 4180 J kg-1 K -1

    Gravitational acceleration: grav = 9.8 m s-2

    Pi: pi = 3.14

    Difference of temperature between ascending and descending branch: deltat

    Difference of density of the water in the two branches: deltarho = deltat dct

    Difference of pressure due to the difference of density: deltap = deltarho grav heigh

    Volume of water conveyed per unit time: vot

    Pressure drop in the pipe: deltap = vot 8 eta len / (pi rdp 4)

    Power conveyed: powd = wsh rho deltat vot

    Putting it all together: deltat2 = 8 powd eta len / (wsh rho pi rdp 4 dct grav heigh) = 3.4 K2

    Everything should work with a temperature difference of less than 2 kelvin. Consequently the radiator isn't required to be very efficient.
    SIRPAL-1 Prototype

    The SIRPAL-1 prototype was made using a 5 mm thick copper sheet for the base, and 2 mm thick copper sheets for the walls. The edge of the square base is 55 mm long. Inside there are two plates 25 mm wide. One is vertically aligned, soldered to the base, to increase the exchange surface near the CPU, the other is horizontal, soldered between the input-output pipe fittings, to guide the fluid in the right direction.

    A test was performed on a K6-2 450MHz which dissipates a power of about 25 watt. The ambient temperature was 18 celsius degrees. After a few hours the CPU temperature, measured by the PC board sensor, was at least 1 kelvin lower than when the fan is used. External surface temperatures: 19 celsius degrees on the pipes; 24 celsius degrees on the copper box.

    A drop of ink in the water revealed a slow flow as expected. It worked so well that I think a more powerful CPU would be efficiently cooled too.

    Figure 3. SIRPAL-1
    (picture)
    Figure 4. SIRPAL-1--Testing
    (picture)

  7. Allow me to suggest... by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...using sponges as sound dampening material inside the case. Who knows, it just might save your computer when somebody bumps the frickin' table and dumps that bowl full of water over everything!!

  8. Welcome to the party, PAL! by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't I see that figure 3 photo in Die Hard with a vengance?

  9. Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trasformer oil is insulating and would not short-out anything. It could also cool the powersupply at the same time, without the inherint saftey risk water subjects us to.

  10. PC or 400psi TCM? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of ironic istn't it that CMOS PCs will eventually need the same plumbing as the TCMs they were supposed to replace.

    Hey I had a 9021-721 MVS/ESA mainframe that used TCM's cooled by a 400psi cooling system. The great thing about the next gen CMOS mainframes was that even though one TCM was now replaced with 3-6 CMOS units, we didn't need a massive chiller system.

    Oh well, guess everything will have huge ass chiller pumps now.

  11. Simpler, Cheaper Method... by jaybird144 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I admire all of those who are willing to actually pipe water into their computers for the sake of keeping them cool, I am still more than a little frightened of this idea. Knowing me, something would end up leaking (probably through fault of my own) and my precious tower would go up in a ball of flame or some such. Rather, I choose to take your regular old air cooling and make it more effective. Through proper cable management, good airflow paths, a set of nice quiet fans, and the ability to control them with respect to how much they are needed, I keep my fan almost as cool as a friend of mine who does have a liquid cooling system, and with very comparable noise levels. If you're willing to do some work and set up a decent air-based system (and be willing to clean out the dust), there's no need to balance a bucket of water precariously on top of one's computer... : |

    1. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Tidan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So much for innovation...

      This guy is trying to be creative and show us a unique way of cooling a computer. Obviously this type of water cooling is somewhat of a new idea, and has yet to be perfected. I mean, he even says that he tested it on a K6-2 computer (relatively low power dissipation).

      Give the guy some credit here! Instead of saying why fans are better and that water (or any liquid) spells disaster, why not try and understand why this is better than the old system?

      First - liquid cooled without a pump = no mechanical parts to fail. Those heat-pipe heatsinks that are becoming popular have liquid inside them, and you probably aren't worried about having them leak. It's possible that there might be a commercial product that does the same thing with gravitational convection of liquids.

      Secondly - eliminating (or reducing) fans not only eliminates noise, it also improves reliability. How many of us have had fans get noisier over time and eventually die on us?

      Anyway, I say more power to this guy. someday we might have the CPU mounted at the bottom of our case, and have a cool lava-lamp looking effect running up the side wall. Let's not be quick to fear new technologies - look at the possibilities first!

      --
      free ipod? yeah.
  12. Re:a few concerns.. by ksuMacGyver · · Score: 5, Funny

    that picture of a bowel of water on top of an open pc tower case is not something I would necessarily run....

    Bowels of water on his PC, this is something I definitely DON'T want to see!

    --

    Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

    Interested in AI? MACR
  13. "Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. " by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, and other times they go a little nutz and use Fluorinert

  14. Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 3, Funny

    5 -- You just inherited $700 from your great-grandfather that's just waiting to be thrown out the proverbial case window

    4 -- A loud smelly watercooling kit is the perfect complement to your neon light tubes

    3 -- Why spend $200 for a brand new P4 when you can pay $500 for supplies and crank your P2 up 30 MHz?

    2 -- That rock fountain you got for Christmas can be put to a much geekier use

    1 -- To impress your classmates at Chubb Institute

    Free blogging for geeks at *nix.org

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
  15. Newer processor would be more interesting by eamber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alright - dude did this on a K6-2 450. They're about HOW many years old now?

    I'd be much more interested to see him cooling an overclocked Athlon XP 2100+ with 1.9 vcore running at 2400 MHz - or something of the like - with the method in the article.

    Ah well, I'm happy with my good 'ol pumps and radiator, myself.

  16. You know...for the cost of a cooling system... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could just buy a *second* computer.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  17. You wanna build a quieter computer? by jsse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You may look here

    Without the need to implement that bulky bowl of water. :)

  18. I found it! by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What? You guys are still using water? I found The Ultimate Cooling Device: Hilary Rosen (aptly named The Ice Princess).

  19. liquid and open cases by trmj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I leave the sides off of my computer for better air flow and less dust collection, but mainly because I'm too lazy to put in case fans.

    Since my case has to sit on top of my desk, this also gives me a little more space to put stuff (inside the case, out of the way of boards / wires etc).

    What do I keep in there? First is the reciever for my wireless keyboard / mouse, the syncing cradle for my handspring visor edge, and a few important papers. Those are the things that don't really move.

    The fun things in there are the mountain dew beer glass, the caffeine shot glass, and usually 2 - 3 open cans of dew. All have soda / caffeine in them and are actively used.

    No, nothing has spilled yet, and yes, I do have cats. 3 of them. They know that if they go near the sacred tower, they get stuff thrown at them (usually a slipper, but on occasion a t-shirt if I find that first).

    On a side note: I in no way have the balls to water-cool my case, other than replacing the cold soda every 30 minutes.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  20. Excellent by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny

    Always good to see continuing advances being made in the field of compu-bong technology.

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
  21. I've never understood why... by rmdyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...the motherboard manufacturers just don't put the processors on the back side of the motherboards.

    Think about it. If the processor and other heat generating chips were on the reverse side you could mount the motherboard in such a way as to press against the large metal backside of your case cabinet. The case cabinet could be designed in such a way as to have indentations that force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel. In fact the entire case back could be a water-cooled heat sink. This would keep the inside of the case "water-free".

    Sure, this would take a radical new case design and motherboard (another industry standard), but that seems to be where we are headed right? I mean processors are getting hotter and Intel and AMD are trying to figure out what to do.

    Why not?

    BTW, I think it has something to do with the fact that the motherboard components are all wave soldered on one side. This would melt most plastic components on that side. I'm not sure about this.

    1. Re:I've never understood why... by StressedEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel


      A nice idea in principle, but cases are there to protect the components inside. If you go physically attaching the components to the case, all you have to do is knock the case and end up stressing the CPU die.


      That said however, I agree some sort of more "holistic" approach could be wise.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
  22. Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Propert by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nah... I'd use transformer oil, and I don't think a Lipton Cup-a-Soup would taste quite the same.

    Transformer oil, however, is probably quite suitable for use in a CPU cooling system.

    It has a higher breakdown voltage than air and is almost infinitely less conductive than real-world (ie. impure) water. Transformer oils are specifically designed for use as an insulating material in large power distribution transformers. Electric utility transformers at power substations, operating in the range of hundreds of thousands of volts, would arc between windings if the oil leaked out of them and air - with its lower breakdown voltage - seeped in. (Air breaks down at about 3kV per millimeter.) You can feel pretty confident that leaked oil won't short out IC pins on your motherboard. Hell, you could also ditch your power supply fan and fill that full of oil, too - just beware of relays and other mechanical components.

    Heat transfer is a big reason for oil, too. In a car engine, much of the heat is generated by friction in the bearings, and motor oil pumped through the bearings takes that heat away. Transformer oil doesn't have to lubricate, nor does it have to carry away huge amounts of impurities or combustion by-products as in a car engine - the biggest requirements are heat carrying capability and high breakdown voltage. Large pole pigs (pole-mounted power transformers) are usually oil-filled and often have pipes coming from the bottom and going to the top - they serve as radiators. Oil flow is not by pump, the reliability would be too low - they're convective, too.

    Finally, viscosity. Yes, this might be difficult, but transformer oils are available in a variety of thicknesses. You want a viscosity corresponding to SAE 0, which is the same as water. Even less might be available, though I've personally never seen it.

    Density changes with temperature rise will have to be considered, since the lower density of hot liquids causes them to rise in the system (and is also the physics behind lava lamps). The system that guy designed is based on the density changes of water. Transformer oil won't behave the same way; accordingly, you'll have to whip out the old slide-rule and do some math. Calculus is your friend. Fortunately, the data on transformer oil should be readily available, it's an important design criteria.

    Voltesso and Diala are good trade names which I've personally used in transformers loaded to hundreds of kilowatts at over 250,000V, at RF frequencies. (FAA obstruction lights on large VLF radio transmitting towers.) They're ALL PCB-free, and while you don't want to drink it, they're no more toxic than motor oil. And it takes a hell of a lot of work to make them catch fire.

    In short, transformer oils are available in a variety of viscosities, are specifically engineered for their thermal transfer capabilities, are not electrically conductive, not dangerous, and are suitable for almost all of your electronic cooling needs.

    The only problem I forsee is that you're gonna have a hard time buying them in quantities less than 45-gallon drums... though the drum would make a great passive radiator. Seriously, talk to a couple of linesmen with your local power utility, maybe you'll be able to talk your way into a couple of gallons of it.

    And once that's done across all the machines in your compile farm, you can get to work tackling the big problems of why Linux isn't ready for the desktop yet.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  23. Nuclear reaction? by dirtyhank · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess Intel meant the surface of the Sun. This outer layer (photosphere) has a temperature of 6000C aprox. Yeah, it's damn hot but quite below from the 15000000C of the core (where the nuclear reactions take place).

    Molten lava temperature is ~1000C so only 5000C to go :-)

  24. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    simple multimeter tests don't just cut it, unless it can measure the 'hit through'(sorry, my english sucks and i don't know the proper word) capabilities of the substance.

    water would make a fine insulator unless the 'hit through'(amount of voltage differential needed for the electricity to jump/hit like lighting through something) was small(and no, i'm not an electricity-engineer).

    anyways, this kind of cooling has been done(submerging the whole mobo in something), couple of times. one guy used some biograde mineral oil succesfully.

    theres at least one no-pump commercial solution too for liquid cooling, but it has a fan on the radiator.

    though, in my opinion, getting rid of the pump doesn't bring you anything 'extra' since the pump makes next to zero noise, and noise damping the pump from environment is easy too. the real problem lies in how to get the water to keep cool without having extra fans(heatload on it gets quite big if you have cpu, gfx-card, chipset, psu, hd's and etc watercooled for silence). the bowl of that size that's in the article won't cut it.

    and really, k6-2 could be cooled enough with just about any lump of metal compared to the 76w+ modern cpu's.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.