Slashdot Mirror


CPU Convective Water Cooling

biso writes "The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is here analyzed and experimented with positive results. Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink."

54 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. /. effect by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's going to be boiling noodles in a minute

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:/. effect by killthiskid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just impressed with a big bowl of water balanced on top of a open tower case. Now THAT takes balls.

      The guy obviously doesn't have cats or any other pets.

    2. Re:/. effect by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the water he is using is most likely de-ionized water as this prevents corrosion in the pipes and water block - although sometimes it is best to mix in some detergent to lessen the water tension in the lines to work out the bubbles.

    3. Re:/. effect by Kronovohr · · Score: 5, Funny

      <offtopic>That reminds me -- a few years ago, I went out of town for a few days, and when I got back my old P200 refused to boot. I yanked out cables and cards in an attempt to get the old beast up and going again, and when I yanked out the sound card, it booted. Well, I put everything back together, and then looked closer at the sound card.

      It had a nice, dried puddle of mouse piss on it, so I put it aside and waited for the next opportunity to grab another one.


      I thought (after I'd gotten another one) that I should have called Dell tech support and discussed the problem with them:



      (them) "Hello, <speil>"

      (me) "Yeah, I've got a mouse problem."

      (them) "What seems to be the problem?"

      (me) "Oh, it sort of pissed on my sound card."
      </offtopic>
  2. odd by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ok, i can see the extra bit of silence from not having a pump would be nice. but ... isnt a bowl of water on top of your computer just asking for trouble? something tells me this guy doesnt have cats.

    1. Re:odd by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's more than one way to boil a cat I guess....

  3. not that complex... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've built numerous different water cooled systems, and the $20 pump from the aquarium supply place is NOT the most complex piece. A good waterjacket for the cpu is by far the most complex and generally most expensive single piece, and also the one that is most critical for good performance. Still need the waterjacket in this design, so it isn't really saving anything...

    1. Re:not that complex... by jasonkohles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure it is, he says right out he didn't eliminate the pump because it was the most expensive part, he wanted to eliminate it because it was the loudest part.

    2. Re:not that complex... by havardi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly; it's a moving part. When computers have absolutely no moving parts... well, that will be nice.

  4. Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's cheap, reliable, odorless and environmentally friendly, and refills are available everywhere. I myself have been using a 78% nitrogen gas mixture at 14.7 PSI to cool all my computer components for years now. Where did I get the idea? I guess I just pulled it out of thin *SMACK*

    1. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by caesar79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      did anyone get this ? u cant mod that "INteresting."

      for those of you who evidently didnt get this, 78% nitrogen mixture at approx 14.7 psi is AIR!!!

  5. too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really think that phase change cooling systems are the future of the PC. Only with phase change cooling systems do you get high quality cooling able to remove the utmost heat away from a CPU and cool it to below freezing.

    I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

    With these considerations passive water cooling is only a good first step and bound to be insufficient, even over the short term.

    1. Re:too hot by havardi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just thinking thinking about the same system he has setup-- but where the water is boiled off the chip into steam... If it could be totally sealed that would hella cool. Of course, it would have to be large. But, you could add plants and simple animals to the ecosystem and it would be an interesting conversational piece

    2. Re:too hot by PsychoKiller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

      Not quite true. I saw the same graph, and it was an extrapolation of current trends.

      Obviously we aren't going to emit more heat/area than a nuclear reaction, something is going to have to change in the design of Intel CPUs.

  6. Content of the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Abstract

    The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is analyzed and experimented with positive results.
    Introduction

    Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used.

    My intent was instead to build a cooler able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink, but without the annoying noise of the fan.

    A first prototype was built out of a regular heatsink. Holes were drilled in the aluminium finning, and copper tubes passed through them. An aquarium pump provided the necessary pressure for circulation.

    Figure 1. First Prototype--Front View
    (picture)
    Figure 2. First Prototype--Side View
    (picture)

    The system was silent and reliable. But with bigger pipes and a lower pressure drop would it have been possible to take away the pump? Simple calculations showed that it would have been perhaps feasible and a prototype was built.
    Temperature on Heatsink Surface

    Roughly:

    Power to be dissipated: powd = 80 W

    If the heatsink is a little copper box to put over the CPU, a reasonable value for the surface available at copper-water interface can be: surfc = 0.01 m2

    The heat transfer coefficient on the water-copper boundary layer can vary from a few watt per square meter per kelvin if the flow is slow and laminar to more than 1 kW K-1m-2 when the flow is very fast and turbulent. If the coefficient is supposed to be: texc = 100 W K-1m -2

    The difference of temperature on surface will be: delt = powd / (texc surfc) = 80 K

    It appears that the water should boil on the surface of such a little heatsink, but radiation wasn't taken into account and the geometry of the box is complex, so it's not clear if there could be turbulence and with which effect. If necessary the surface could be enhanced with fins or by increasing the dimension of the equipment.
    Convection

    Supposing that the heatsink could be able to exchange the heat between the CPU and the water, would it flow through the pipes?

    Power to convey: powd = 80 W

    Length of the circuit branches between the CPU and the radiator on the top of the computer case: heigh = 0.8 m

    Equivalent length of the circuit (we take into account the bends too): len = 2 m

    Radius of the pipe: rdp = 9 10-3 m

    Rate of change of water density against temperature: dct = 0.55 kg m-3 K -1

    Water density: rho = 103 kg m-3

    Water viscosity: eta = 10-3 decapoise

    Specific heat of water: wsh = 4180 J kg-1 K -1

    Gravitational acceleration: grav = 9.8 m s-2

    Pi: pi = 3.14

    Difference of temperature between ascending and descending branch: deltat

    Difference of density of the water in the two branches: deltarho = deltat dct

    Difference of pressure due to the difference of density: deltap = deltarho grav heigh

    Volume of water conveyed per unit time: vot

    Pressure drop in the pipe: deltap = vot 8 eta len / (pi rdp 4)

    Power conveyed: powd = wsh rho deltat vot

    Putting it all together: deltat2 = 8 powd eta len / (wsh rho pi rdp 4 dct grav heigh) = 3.4 K2

    Everything should work with a temperature difference of less than 2 kelvin. Consequently the radiator isn't required to be very efficient.
    SIRPAL-1 Prototype

    The SIRPAL-1 prototype was made using a 5 mm thick copper sheet for the base, and 2 mm thick copper sheets for the walls. The edge of the square base is 55 mm long. Inside there are two plates 25 mm wide. One is vertically aligned, soldered to the base, to increase the exchange surface near the CPU, the other is horizontal, soldered between the input-output pipe fittings, to guide the fluid in the right direction.

    A test was performed on a K6-2 450MHz which dissipates a power of about 25 watt. The ambient temperature was 18 celsius degrees. After a few hours the CPU temperature, measured by the PC board sensor, was at least 1 kelvin lower than when the fan is used. External surface temperatures: 19 celsius degrees on the pipes; 24 celsius degrees on the copper box.

    A drop of ink in the water revealed a slow flow as expected. It worked so well that I think a more powerful CPU would be efficiently cooled too.

    Figure 3. SIRPAL-1
    (picture)
    Figure 4. SIRPAL-1--Testing
    (picture)

  7. Allow me to suggest... by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...using sponges as sound dampening material inside the case. Who knows, it just might save your computer when somebody bumps the frickin' table and dumps that bowl full of water over everything!!

  8. Welcome to the party, PAL! by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't I see that figure 3 photo in Die Hard with a vengance?

  9. Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trasformer oil is insulating and would not short-out anything. It could also cool the powersupply at the same time, without the inherint saftey risk water subjects us to.

    1. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he means insulating as in: does not conduct electricity. If they did not want heat transfer in a transformer, they would use air: cheap, does not conduct heat or electricity.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll tell you why. It is extremely hazardous stuff. In order to increase the boiling point of the oil, PCB's (ya know, polychlorinated biphenyls) and other toxic nonvolatiles are added to the oil. If you spill that crap, it's worse for you and the environment compared to Freon.

    3. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The use of PCB's in transformer oil continued into the early nineties. They just used the "less toxic" (i.e. less chlorinated) PCBs. Anyways, we've found out that these enantiomers are probably more dangerous than their heavier counterparts. Besides, if most /.ers had a choice between buying transformer oil and finding an old ruined transformer in a junkyard (yes, you can actually find them there) and making the oil "open source", what do you think they would choose?

    4. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's pump it and two read the following standards. The oil has to be thin to cool transformers.

      Polychlorinated Biphenyls (D 4059) Regulations prohibiting the commercial distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) mandate that insulating oils be examined for PCB contamination levels to assure that new products do not contain detectable amounts.

      Viscosity (D 445) Viscosity is the resistance of oil to flow under specified conditions. The viscosity of oil used as a coolant influences heat transfer rates and consequently the temperature rise of an apparatus. The viscosity of an oil also influences the speed of moving parts in tap changers and circuit breakers. High viscosity oils are less desirable, especially in cold climates. Standard viscosity curves can be generated using Method D 341 by measuring two or three data points and plotting the data on special chart paper. The resulting curve can be used to interpolate or extrapolate values at temperatures where the viscosity is not measured directly.

  10. tesla turbine... by Aine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...powered by water (or even antifreeze) could conceivably do two jobs: provide cooling for the cpu and produce power. It wouldn't have to be all that big either. It might not produce that much power, but probably enough to light a small desk lamp.

    --
    So far left, I'm right.
  11. PC or 400psi TCM? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of ironic istn't it that CMOS PCs will eventually need the same plumbing as the TCMs they were supposed to replace.

    Hey I had a 9021-721 MVS/ESA mainframe that used TCM's cooled by a 400psi cooling system. The great thing about the next gen CMOS mainframes was that even though one TCM was now replaced with 3-6 CMOS units, we didn't need a massive chiller system.

    Oh well, guess everything will have huge ass chiller pumps now.

  12. Simpler, Cheaper Method... by jaybird144 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I admire all of those who are willing to actually pipe water into their computers for the sake of keeping them cool, I am still more than a little frightened of this idea. Knowing me, something would end up leaking (probably through fault of my own) and my precious tower would go up in a ball of flame or some such. Rather, I choose to take your regular old air cooling and make it more effective. Through proper cable management, good airflow paths, a set of nice quiet fans, and the ability to control them with respect to how much they are needed, I keep my fan almost as cool as a friend of mine who does have a liquid cooling system, and with very comparable noise levels. If you're willing to do some work and set up a decent air-based system (and be willing to clean out the dust), there's no need to balance a bucket of water precariously on top of one's computer... : |

    1. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Tidan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So much for innovation...

      This guy is trying to be creative and show us a unique way of cooling a computer. Obviously this type of water cooling is somewhat of a new idea, and has yet to be perfected. I mean, he even says that he tested it on a K6-2 computer (relatively low power dissipation).

      Give the guy some credit here! Instead of saying why fans are better and that water (or any liquid) spells disaster, why not try and understand why this is better than the old system?

      First - liquid cooled without a pump = no mechanical parts to fail. Those heat-pipe heatsinks that are becoming popular have liquid inside them, and you probably aren't worried about having them leak. It's possible that there might be a commercial product that does the same thing with gravitational convection of liquids.

      Secondly - eliminating (or reducing) fans not only eliminates noise, it also improves reliability. How many of us have had fans get noisier over time and eventually die on us?

      Anyway, I say more power to this guy. someday we might have the CPU mounted at the bottom of our case, and have a cool lava-lamp looking effect running up the side wall. Let's not be quick to fear new technologies - look at the possibilities first!

      --
      free ipod? yeah.
    2. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by zmooc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Water is corrosive. A small leak might not immediately be noticed but water will destroy everything on its path over the mobo if it gets the time.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
  13. Re:a few concerns.. by ksuMacGyver · · Score: 5, Funny

    that picture of a bowel of water on top of an open pc tower case is not something I would necessarily run....

    Bowels of water on his PC, this is something I definitely DON'T want to see!

    --

    Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

    Interested in AI? MACR
  14. "Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. " by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, and other times they go a little nutz and use Fluorinert

  15. I'm sure others have had this idea by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I have. I think eventually we'll see some commercially available sealed systems that use some liquid (probably not water because of its corrosive properties) and convection to move it around.

    Something idiot proof and self contained with no mechanical parts, save perhaps a slower turning large fan to exhaust air.

    So far existing heat pipes are not much more than a novelty. The wick style ones with alcohol as a fluid (mentioned here awhile back) look promising.

    The giant skivved aluminum/copper blocks with the big ass fans aren't going to cut it, not just because of noise, but practicality.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  16. Re:a few concerns.. by PerlHeadJax · · Score: 2, Funny

    you could make the system safer by enclosing the bowel

    You make your roommates happier when you enclose your bowel, too.

  17. Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 3, Funny

    5 -- You just inherited $700 from your great-grandfather that's just waiting to be thrown out the proverbial case window

    4 -- A loud smelly watercooling kit is the perfect complement to your neon light tubes

    3 -- Why spend $200 for a brand new P4 when you can pay $500 for supplies and crank your P2 up 30 MHz?

    2 -- That rock fountain you got for Christmas can be put to a much geekier use

    1 -- To impress your classmates at Chubb Institute

    Free blogging for geeks at *nix.org

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
  18. Newer processor would be more interesting by eamber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alright - dude did this on a K6-2 450. They're about HOW many years old now?

    I'd be much more interested to see him cooling an overclocked Athlon XP 2100+ with 1.9 vcore running at 2400 MHz - or something of the like - with the method in the article.

    Ah well, I'm happy with my good 'ol pumps and radiator, myself.

    1. Re:Newer processor would be more interesting by HFXPro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes that would be interesting. Infact, it might work even better especially if his water column was better designed with the larger processor. Larger processor = more heat = less dense water = faster rising water = more water moving to replace the warmer water. But I have nothing to back this up. But hey, Ford was able to cool the Model T with passive water cooling, so it could work. Key word is could. Don't quote me on it. Side Note - Nuclear subs now use convection cooling to end even the *quite* pump noise.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    2. Re:Newer processor would be more interesting by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alright, maybe he didn't want to spill water on a new comp? Obvious? I guess not.

      --
      Yawn.
  19. You know...for the cost of a cooling system... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could just buy a *second* computer.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  20. You wanna build a quieter computer? by jsse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You may look here

    Without the need to implement that bulky bowl of water. :)

  21. I found it! by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What? You guys are still using water? I found The Ultimate Cooling Device: Hilary Rosen (aptly named The Ice Princess).

    1. Re:I found it! by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but w/ her sitting on your processor, she'll just nag you about downloading stuff. A water cooling system would be *much* quieter.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  22. liquid and open cases by trmj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I leave the sides off of my computer for better air flow and less dust collection, but mainly because I'm too lazy to put in case fans.

    Since my case has to sit on top of my desk, this also gives me a little more space to put stuff (inside the case, out of the way of boards / wires etc).

    What do I keep in there? First is the reciever for my wireless keyboard / mouse, the syncing cradle for my handspring visor edge, and a few important papers. Those are the things that don't really move.

    The fun things in there are the mountain dew beer glass, the caffeine shot glass, and usually 2 - 3 open cans of dew. All have soda / caffeine in them and are actively used.

    No, nothing has spilled yet, and yes, I do have cats. 3 of them. They know that if they go near the sacred tower, they get stuff thrown at them (usually a slipper, but on occasion a t-shirt if I find that first).

    On a side note: I in no way have the balls to water-cool my case, other than replacing the cold soda every 30 minutes.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  23. Excellent by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny

    Always good to see continuing advances being made in the field of compu-bong technology.

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
  24. This is how liquid cooling should be done by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that should be pointed out is this is how liquid cooling should have been done from the start. The reason their not is because most if not all of the home pc case cooling systems are things slapped together by people without engineering background in such things. Good liquid cooling systems are designed like this. There should be no pump to cool your cpu. The problem is to do it right involves doing some calculations which most don't do so they just use a pump. It's not a very hard thing as you can see by the article.

    Now on a side note, if you like the idea of passive cooling loops Shuttle XPC cases now come with them. They use very similar ideas. You have liquid in a tube, when it vaporizes it rises to the upper radiator where it condenses and a fan carries the heat away and the water returns to the cpu side of the loop. Not sure if it vaporizes or just gets hot to move up the tube, really just a matter of effectiveness. It does a good job in lowering cpu fan noise. Unfortenly the noise of the PSU is very high in these things, or at least my SN41g2, though i belive the P4's have same PSU. The need the same thing on the PSU as the cpu. Also the "heat pipe" is a work of art.

  25. efficiency by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Sure, heat convection flows, but your efficiency goes way up if you have an active flow. Same principle with hot water heating. They used to not have pumps to circulate the water - because it worked - but it's more efficient to have a pump.

  26. I've never understood why... by rmdyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...the motherboard manufacturers just don't put the processors on the back side of the motherboards.

    Think about it. If the processor and other heat generating chips were on the reverse side you could mount the motherboard in such a way as to press against the large metal backside of your case cabinet. The case cabinet could be designed in such a way as to have indentations that force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel. In fact the entire case back could be a water-cooled heat sink. This would keep the inside of the case "water-free".

    Sure, this would take a radical new case design and motherboard (another industry standard), but that seems to be where we are headed right? I mean processors are getting hotter and Intel and AMD are trying to figure out what to do.

    Why not?

    BTW, I think it has something to do with the fact that the motherboard components are all wave soldered on one side. This would melt most plastic components on that side. I'm not sure about this.

    1. Re:I've never understood why... by StressedEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel


      A nice idea in principle, but cases are there to protect the components inside. If you go physically attaching the components to the case, all you have to do is knock the case and end up stressing the CPU die.


      That said however, I agree some sort of more "holistic" approach could be wise.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    2. Re:I've never understood why... by stienman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm glad you're not too sure about this. Since wave soldering requires getting the metal bits (pins, copper traces, etc) up to soldering temperature for the soldering process to actually work it doesn't matter where the plastic is if it touches metal that needs to be soldered.

      Typicially medium temperature plastics can easily handle the 300-500 F temperatures needed for soldering. The problem with mounting the socket on the backside is that you'd have to solder the opposite side of the board, and the socket would have to be covered so the wave soldering process wouldn't force solder into the socket holes.

      Since the chipset is often BGA (Ball Grid Array), and many components are surface mount and require a seperate process anyway (usually infrared heating, sometimes oven heating) then the extra soldering isn't that much of an issue, nor is the protective cover over the socket. Rerouting the board backwards would be a pain though, and since it'd essentially require new case designs and could cause burns if not properly vented...

      Well, there really isn't a *good* reason to go to that amount of trouble for what appears to be a very small market of people who would trade $200 - $300 for a passive heatsink on the outside case. (define very small as < 5 million units sold worldwide)

      -Adam

  27. Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Propert by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nah... I'd use transformer oil, and I don't think a Lipton Cup-a-Soup would taste quite the same.

    Transformer oil, however, is probably quite suitable for use in a CPU cooling system.

    It has a higher breakdown voltage than air and is almost infinitely less conductive than real-world (ie. impure) water. Transformer oils are specifically designed for use as an insulating material in large power distribution transformers. Electric utility transformers at power substations, operating in the range of hundreds of thousands of volts, would arc between windings if the oil leaked out of them and air - with its lower breakdown voltage - seeped in. (Air breaks down at about 3kV per millimeter.) You can feel pretty confident that leaked oil won't short out IC pins on your motherboard. Hell, you could also ditch your power supply fan and fill that full of oil, too - just beware of relays and other mechanical components.

    Heat transfer is a big reason for oil, too. In a car engine, much of the heat is generated by friction in the bearings, and motor oil pumped through the bearings takes that heat away. Transformer oil doesn't have to lubricate, nor does it have to carry away huge amounts of impurities or combustion by-products as in a car engine - the biggest requirements are heat carrying capability and high breakdown voltage. Large pole pigs (pole-mounted power transformers) are usually oil-filled and often have pipes coming from the bottom and going to the top - they serve as radiators. Oil flow is not by pump, the reliability would be too low - they're convective, too.

    Finally, viscosity. Yes, this might be difficult, but transformer oils are available in a variety of thicknesses. You want a viscosity corresponding to SAE 0, which is the same as water. Even less might be available, though I've personally never seen it.

    Density changes with temperature rise will have to be considered, since the lower density of hot liquids causes them to rise in the system (and is also the physics behind lava lamps). The system that guy designed is based on the density changes of water. Transformer oil won't behave the same way; accordingly, you'll have to whip out the old slide-rule and do some math. Calculus is your friend. Fortunately, the data on transformer oil should be readily available, it's an important design criteria.

    Voltesso and Diala are good trade names which I've personally used in transformers loaded to hundreds of kilowatts at over 250,000V, at RF frequencies. (FAA obstruction lights on large VLF radio transmitting towers.) They're ALL PCB-free, and while you don't want to drink it, they're no more toxic than motor oil. And it takes a hell of a lot of work to make them catch fire.

    In short, transformer oils are available in a variety of viscosities, are specifically engineered for their thermal transfer capabilities, are not electrically conductive, not dangerous, and are suitable for almost all of your electronic cooling needs.

    The only problem I forsee is that you're gonna have a hard time buying them in quantities less than 45-gallon drums... though the drum would make a great passive radiator. Seriously, talk to a couple of linesmen with your local power utility, maybe you'll be able to talk your way into a couple of gallons of it.

    And once that's done across all the machines in your compile farm, you can get to work tackling the big problems of why Linux isn't ready for the desktop yet.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  28. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That was a very informative post, does anyone know if motor oil is conductive, I would think that a quart of 5W20 or another light oil would flow pretty well through a small submersable pump. My favorite transformer oil story was from a local Utility guy who came to our school years ago. He asked us if we ever wanted to shoot the transformers with our pellet guns, and then told us that he used to want to as a kid, but that it would be a bad idea since the oil would leak and the transformer would fail possibly explosivly.
    What I found funny was that I don't think a single person had ever thought about shooting a transformer until he mentioned it, and the fact that they could explode might be something that would encourage young boys to shoot one with their pellet gun.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  29. I live in wisconsin by codepunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is about -12 deg outside at the moment. Why do this when I can just put my machine outside my window. You guys in California have to resort to something like this? Time to move....

    --


    Got Code?
  30. Nuclear reaction? by dirtyhank · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess Intel meant the surface of the Sun. This outer layer (photosphere) has a temperature of 6000C aprox. Yeah, it's damn hot but quite below from the 15000000C of the core (where the nuclear reactions take place).

    Molten lava temperature is ~1000C so only 5000C to go :-)

  31. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    simple multimeter tests don't just cut it, unless it can measure the 'hit through'(sorry, my english sucks and i don't know the proper word) capabilities of the substance.

    water would make a fine insulator unless the 'hit through'(amount of voltage differential needed for the electricity to jump/hit like lighting through something) was small(and no, i'm not an electricity-engineer).

    anyways, this kind of cooling has been done(submerging the whole mobo in something), couple of times. one guy used some biograde mineral oil succesfully.

    theres at least one no-pump commercial solution too for liquid cooling, but it has a fan on the radiator.

    though, in my opinion, getting rid of the pump doesn't bring you anything 'extra' since the pump makes next to zero noise, and noise damping the pump from environment is easy too. the real problem lies in how to get the water to keep cool without having extra fans(heatload on it gets quite big if you have cpu, gfx-card, chipset, psu, hd's and etc watercooled for silence). the bowl of that size that's in the article won't cut it.

    and really, k6-2 could be cooled enough with just about any lump of metal compared to the 76w+ modern cpu's.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  32. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not take in one step further and install a CPU-powered lava lamp? It's the next logical step from AOpen's valve amplifier motherboards.

  33. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Albinoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember posting in a car forum after doing some research. Oils are very BAD.

    Thermal contuctivity for water is .6W/mK (bout halfway down the page)
    The oil I found was from some company called Slovnaft out of Slovakia (the only one I could find that would provide details). But their oil that is specifically meant for moving heat has a thermal conductivity of .13W/mK.

    Another thing I might point out is if youve ever got motor oil on your hands youll notice it feels warmer than water of the same temperature. It doesnt carry heat away like water will.

  34. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

    if youve ever got motor oil on your hands youll notice it feels warmer than water of the same temperature. It doesnt carry heat away like water will.

    True, but water is about a zillion times more evaporative than oil, so if you get any water on you, especially if it's warmer than body temp, it's already evaporating and thus feels cooler than warm oil would.

    If you have ever got your hands wet in the winter time, you'll notice that it literally sucks the heat right out of your hand because the relative humidity in winter is usually very low and it doesn't take much to make the water on your hands start evaporating. If you got cold oil on your hands (at the same temperature as the cold water) it won't feel nearly as cold as it's not evaporating. It will pull enough heat out of your hands to reach thermal equilibrium and then stop.

    If you have ever splashed hot water on yourself, you'll notice that even if you get burned, the inital 'hot' part of it is over with almost immediately. Hot oil on the other continues to feel hot and will continue to burn you much longer.

    In an enclosed system where there is no evaporation, the difference won't be nearly as great.

    Has anyone ever built a water-cooled PC that uses an external fountain as a radiator? Obviously you would want it far enough away from the PC so as to prevent splashing, but I think one of those little zen rock fountains would make an interesting and relaxing radiator, as long as you remembered to keep adding water... :-)

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips