Slashdot Mirror


LOTR: War of the Ring Real-Time Strategy Game

DiZASTiX writes "Just saw this on Gamespot about LOTR: War of the Ring a Warcraft III like LOTR game: "The Lord of the Rings: War of the Ring has only been in development for around seven or eight months, but at a press event in Berlin this week we were lucky enough to catch a glimpse of the game in its current state. The map itself was relatively featureless at this stage of development but boasted some great grass textures and trees, which were occasionally shadowed by the suggestion of clouds passing overhead. More impressive still were the character models on display, which, although unfinished, bore more than a passing resemblance to the colorful, stylized units of Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos.""

12 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Woo! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > The map itself was relatively featureless at this stage of development but boasted some great grass textures and trees, which were occasionally shadowed by the suggestion of clouds passing overhead.

    Sounds like a great game - can't wait!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Woo! by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you think thats great, you'll freak when you see my backyard.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Things promise to get much more exciting with the "The Drying of the Paint" mod.

  2. Warcraft and LoTR? by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What resources am I supposed to mine? Tolkien was about how awful industrialization and cutting down trees and mining stuff was. And here's a game that may end up glorifying it?

    1. Re:Warcraft and LoTR? by levik · · Score: 4, Informative
      If you bothered to read the article, you would know that the game is divvied up into two campaigns:

      The "Good" campaign is about making do mostly with "hero" units, while the "evil" campaign is about massive buildups of force (possibly resulting from resource mining).

      So no inconsistencies here.

      --
      Ñ'
    2. Re:Warcraft and LoTR? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      You could grow pipeweed to power your troops.

      Sounds unlikely? Look at what they did with Galactic Battelgrounds, where you can have your R2 units gather berries and fish.

  3. Impressive? by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    How much can you really tell from a pre-pre-beta version of the game? At this point, there's still a 50-50 chance we'll never even see this one in production.

    Good to know it's (maybe) coming, though. I wonder how well LoTR will translate to this format -- it is an extremely hero-driven mythos (even beyond the quest of the Ring Bearer), and the avatar/hero units in RTS games I've played previously were rather disappointing when compared with Gandalf or Aragorn.

    If Aragorn can't lead an army of the dead, I'll be very disappointed. If they turn Galdalf from subtle mage into just another flashy area-damage unit, I'm tossing the whole affair out the window. That is, of course, assuming it runs well under WineX in the first place...

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  4. Re:Isn't there already an LoTR RTS game? by AlternateSyndicate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering that approximately 500 LoTR-themed games have been made in the past 20 years, it's safe to assume that one is an RTS I'm sure.

  5. Developer's Track Record by SubliminalLove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Black Label Games, it seems, is a subsidiary of Vivendi Universal Games, the makers of such great games as Homeworlds, Baldur's Gate, etc...

    I'm not really sold on them, though, for this kind of production. Homeworlds, while it was a pretty game, was absolute crap in terms of strategy, and the next closest thing to a RTS they've made was the Caesar series, which is a lot like Sim City for crack-babies (don't get me wrong; I liked it, but it's weird).

    I'm sick of this dichotomy in the gaming industry. Any game based on a universe the gaming community knows and loves will suck, because the company in charge knows it will sell like crazy based solely on the license appeal. I wish just once the big men on top would be sack-heavy enough to take a solid license and then give the game the time it takes to really make it rock.

    There is hope for us. Matrix: Reloaded looks like it may very well not suck. But when a company gets the license to LOTR and then just starts pumping the games out like this (evidently Vivendi's Black Label has sole license to the video games for the LOTR universe), they're all going to be crappy and/or simplistic.

    Game companies: We gamers are patient. We'll wait the two or three years it takes to bring together a good title! Making a good RTS doesn't happen in eight months!

    ~SL

  6. Not clouds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The map itself was relatively featureless at this stage of development but boasted some great grass textures and trees, which were occasionally shadowed by the suggestion of clouds passing overhead.

    Clouds? Those are Nazgul flying overhead!
    [eerie music sounds]
    Mwhuahaha!

  7. Re:RTS Games by voodoo1man · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, if you go back to the good old days of 1998, you'll realize that the RTS bandwagon effect was at it's first peak right about then, and that this is only the second coming. Microsoft's AOE rode in pretty much on the tail end of the peak.

    Now you may ask yourself, why did the trend suddenly decline for a few years? Remember such classic titles as Earth 2027, KKND, KKND expansions pack, Earth 2227 (or whatever), KKND 2, KKND 2 expansion pack, and of course C&C Red Alert: expansion packs 1, 2 and 3 (is there a fourth one I'm missing?)? I believe the phrase "C&C clone" first became popular during this time, and for good reason. Most of these games sucked and sold poorly.

    Now the great cycle of life continues: the investors who got burned on the first crop have largely gone some other way, and Warcraft III (what the hell does AOE have to do with 'recently'?) is one of the top-selling games in recent memory, proving once again that if you're Blizzard, you can get away with making incremental changes to your games, slapping on a roman numeral on the box, and still make millions. Of course, to game publishers this means leeching season (never mind that most of the clone titles are guaranteed to flop miserably - they're investors! they take risks without thinking!).

    Also, why exactly can't you reveal who your employer is? Do they chain you to the radiator and beat you for talking to strangers? Or do you use your exotic on-line identity to post internal memos on Fatbabies? In any which case, you could have at least posted anonymously.

    --

    In the great CONS chain of life, you can either be the CAR or be in the CDR.

  8. Hopefully not another Theme Game by The+Keyer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope this does not end up like the StarWars thing. StarWars is an amazingly over used Title. May of there game are just bad graphics and storyline with the name "StarWars" in the title. It is for this reason that I never look at these games when I decide what kind game I want to buy.

    I can only hope that these devoplers don't make the same mistake in the LotR title.