Slashdot Mirror
Film Gimp Project Renamed to CinePaint
ubiquitin writes "To avoid confusion with the GIMP, the Film Gimp project has renamed itself to CinePaint. The project is essentially a legitimate fork of GIMP, and is focused on image manipulations for moving pictures." We've mentioned Film Gimp several times lately; it'll be even handier as programs like Cinelerra and Kino grow more polished.
It's always fun to be using software with a name that coincides with my favorite sexual role.
I agree, Cinepaint is the best. FrIMP ? ;-)
Very popular slashdot journal for adul
CinePaint? Not exactly a creative name. Out of the names mentioned as candidates in the press release, Film-Fu is easily the funniest. But I guess being funny isn't exactly what they wanted to achieve for "the most popular open source tool in feature motion picture work" ...
Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
Hard to believe GIMP has a topic of it's own, despite the fact this is the first story in the topic for over a year (see here), when overclocking (which I'd love to filter without removing hardware!)/individual BSD's/P2P (including the RIAA/MPAA/*AA)/and so on don't have topics!
Does this mean the developers have to park further away now?
Scooby-Doo, Harry Potter, Cats & Dogs, Dr. Dolittle 2, Little Nicky, Grinch, Sixth Day, Stuart Little, Planet of the Apes, Showtime, Blue Crush, and The Fast and the Furious II.
This is really cool. I used to think it was just another Open Source project where someone creates a SourceForge website and then abandons it two months later after no code is written.
31 people regularly point & click my G-spot
Gimp is a name subject to ridicule, at least now I can use something that dosen't sound lame.
What the heck is a "legitimate fork"? Does this mean that there are "rogue forks"? And, yes, I know what a "fork" is (IT and otherwise), but I've never heard of a legitimate fork.
What strikes me here is that if we're now going to call forks legitimate and rogue (or whatever), that implies that there's some authority in charge of authorizing or blessing these forks. Part of the beauty of OS is that a given project always stands the risk of losing mindshare with its user base to forks which may do a better job of fulfilling the needs of the community. Calling them "legitimate" or rogue or whatever you will, seems to be irrelevant.
Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
Thats two name changes. First gnome gets renamed to lame and now gimp to cinepaint. Maybe kde will drop the k and callthemselves something like teldkde (the extensible lame desktop killing desktop environment).
I mean, how much credibility do you expect from the outside world by giving your project a cutesy name like "GIMP"? Last time I checked, that was a slang term for a cripple, and a not-very-nice slang term at that.
Maybe "Cinematic Layout Imaging Tool" might have been more in keeping with the spirit of cute acronyms.
this is news because?
I once tried GIMP on Windows, but it opened up about a dozen independent windows such that it flooded the task bar beyond use. I wonder if CineGump (or whatever they will call it) will open up a window (task) for each film frame. That would like be really annoying, gals.
How about Forrest Gimp?
Why fork?
Are there features going into CinePaint that aren't valid for GIMP? And the other way around?
It seems like both projects might benefit by staying more tightly coupled.
OK, so it's not self made.
But can you specify *.slashdot.org? Surely you just put slashdot.org if you want to indicate all the hosts, and subdomains.
Get your own free personal location tracker
Too bad for the GIMP.
A lot of people had been hoping to see a backporting and/or merge between these two versions. This sounds like the architecture's going to be mainly irreparable.
Some people would really like to see deep color channels and stronger tools for doing compositing work on movie frames.
The more that digital cameras offer 12bpc RAW mode, the more the OSS world is lacking until GIMP can handle them well. Color corrections can and should be done with more bits, to avoid losing fine color integrity.
[
I agree with them. CinePaint is definitely a much more professional sounding name than FilmGimp was and also more than the other suggestions.
:P
If it had a name like FilmStudio, it would sound to me like an amateur effort (My First Film Studio?!?!), which we know it is not and would not have the success it will most certainly have in the future.
Well I like it anyway
Arc
If you want more information, search about both projects, read their mailing lists and websites.
It had nothing to do with the failure of marketing tests with the brand name "File Cripple".
Why break away from the gimp name if its a fork?
physically challenged film
The project is essentially a legitimate fork of GIMP
Good, because you know how bad the "support" costs can get when you fork illegitimate chil... errr.... projects.
Second path, which seems to have been discarded by CinePaint people, is pushing the GEGL library ignoring old code, make small test apps, and then merge with GIMP. A more parellel aproach.
For GIMP people all is like in the past, no new hands helping, either with current project or with libraries for future one. For CinePaint they get a quick solution, but maybe a dead end. :(
Oh, well...
pls to have at least a little tiny bit of a clue what the FUCK you're talking about.
kthxbye
GIMP 1.3 does not have support for 16 bit per channel.
Is everyone on Slashdot a moron?
and you can only create amateur looking trash.
Please call us when you make a 22 million dollar grossing movie..
because until then you're just some know-nothing moron who's just blowing hot air up everyones ass.
people who do the real thing doesnt use the crap you use.
Maybe you should read your news here then.
I have one serious suggestion to make. Please port Gimp and CinePaint to KDE. The benefits are laying on the hands:
- C++ for rapid development
- QT/KDE for a seriously cool plattform
- Better maintainance
- More acceptance due to QT/KDE
Why, he's a guy posing as a girl, posing as another girl, he doesn't have to hgave a clue
Open cutting software. :)
I was sure you posted something higher up implying that you actually had a clue as to what this program was. Obviously not. Film GIMP (sorry CinePaint) is 'a free open source painting and image retouching program designed to be more suitable for film work than GIMP or Adobe Photoshop.' (from the web site). It is a paint program, designed for editing and retouching individual frames in a movie, not a video editing tool. It is aimed at film studios, not at people like you. If you think iMovie would cut it in these situations then you are mistaken.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
I was reading this article and I saw the icon for the gimp, you know the weird looking dog creature. Well anyways it freaked me out when I saw its freaking eyes move! I kinda got scared... DAMN MOVING GIF FILES!
keanmarine.com
It's an animated gif, the eyes move. I thought for sure I was hallucinating again only this time I'm not suffering from sleep deprevation. I was thinking maybe just a little bit too much Pepsi for me...or maybe the eyes don't move?? eh? eh?
in this case thats not porting... its rewritting code. waste of time.
however you want to write some wrappers for c++ or qt widgets, have at it.
Why not call it 'CinePint'?
Even gimp itself goes far beyond what photoshop can do in these circumstances, and filmgimp/cinepaint is just the logical extension to this software, that brings it into line with the workflow practices for digital film production.
This one has Adobe sweating.
To avoid confusion with MS Paint, the CinePaint project has renamed itself to Film Gimp.
boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
Near as I can tell it's best described as competition for Pinnacle's Commotion.
Chris
Did anyone notice that the icon for gimp is ANIMATED (his eys move) is this me, or is this the FIRST animated gif on slashdot??
Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
A functional fork, to coin a term, is different. At my company, we have several different version of our client software, all of which does basically the same thing in different contexts. We organize this by placing most common functionality in a shared library, and using different code for each context (email integration, web client, desktop client, et cetera.) The codebases have enough different functionality that different code should be used, with common stuff in its own sandbox.
This is a good way to go. It encourages the core code to be put into a generic library. Having a GIMP for single images and a GIMP for sequential images will move the developers to code in a way that maximizes reuse. They're not (really) competing with each other, so there's nothing to lose by sharing. And they'll each have their own space to work in, without having a poorly-overloaded interface for both single and sequential images.
Or, they could not share code, and it could suck. But the incentive is there for sharing, and the architecture of both systems would naturally improve.
"Whatever happened to fair use?"
-- Duff-Man
Film Qaeda
Baby Guts
Visual Anthrax
PhotoPlacenta
In a case such as this where the project name changes, what happens to the CVS module name? Does it change as well? Is everyone required to re-pull the source from a new name? And finally, how is the history preserved?
Now without a lame name.
I have a website. It's about Macs.
I'm not suggesting there aren't any, just that I don't know of any. From the GTK world I have GIMP, Pan and XChat on my Windows laptop. They are certainly in varying stages of completeness, but they all work. In fact don't licencing issues mean that, for GPL Software at least, the "guarunteed portability" you speak of is irrelevant because QT isn't available under GPL on Windows so GPL apps built against QT can't be distributed?
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
Don't feed the trolls.
Now at least GPL'd software has a chance to be mainstream.
Using normal-sounding, non-GNU names suggests a mainstream product to the uninformed. What CIO wants to go into a board meeting to pitch a plan to save the company money by using "free" open-source software products that sound like GIMPs, DOPEs, Snakes, and coffee beans?? Non-technical types will think (s)He is out of their flippin' mind.
Now if only the KDE developers would stop naming everything with a K....
a usable UI, unlike its parent? If it does have a sane UI, would somebody please port it to the Gimp?
hum ?
After all GTK stands for GIMP Toolkit.
It's ludicrous for anyone outside the project to suggest a wholesale change from C/GTK+ to C++/QT. It's the people who work on the project who actually have to work with the code and it makes sense for them to work with what they are most familiar and comfortable with.
You will certainly not get "Better maintenance" or "rapid development" if you disenfranchise your developers. The "cool platform" and "more acceptance due to QT/KDE" just reek of KDE fanboy garbage.
If any of these theoretical reasons were practically significant then there'd be no need for a request to port GIMP. People would _want_ to use QT and Krita (or whatever) would be a significant app already.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
My 9th grade son has been using Cinelerra to put together several cinematography projects for school. It does crash occasionally so you want to make sure you save your layouts periodically, and it uses HUGE amounts of memory when loading in video files (it seems to want to store everything in memory), but it has a pretty decent set of features, including multi-layer editing, numerous effects and transitions, and clustered rendering. It may not be as mature as the best commercial packages, but it's already as good as or better than most of the low-end programs that come with most capture devices. He's been using Blender to do 3D titles and credits and stuff like that.
The combination of Cinelerra + Blender + FilmGimp is pretty decent considering it's all open source. You can do better with commercial software, but not without spending many thousands of dollars.
Oh bs. How could any Linux - the only OS this software supports - user not know what the Gimp is? It's been the only graphics editor of consequence since before linux was shipped in boxes.
Oh bs.
Exactly. I was joking. I see that you posted that as anonymous, so you may never read my reply.
Here I thought that i was just being really paranoid.
FRA: STFU GTFO
the most important area to these guys. as far as i can tell, is getting it on to OSX and selling it(metaphorically speeking) to Mac users, if they wanted the package to have a future on the linux desktop surely they'd be working on porting to GTK2 and then to OSX from there.
just out of interest, what can one actually do with filmgimp, sorry, CinePaint? i built it the other day and tried to have a play around, could really work out how to do anything at all, and is it just me or is it strange that they leave script-fu's that don't work with the filmgimp plugin set in the distro?
Software Freedom Day!.
Film Goatse
That's why the parent was modded funny...you don't seem to be very intelligent...
I've had FilmGimp sitting on my hard disk for several weeks now. And I can't figure out what makes it a cooler app than Gimp proper. I don't think FilmGimp is really of useful for the average GNU/Linux or *BSD user, who'll be more interested in ripping DVD's or VCD's than doing laborious frame-by-frame correcxtion. FilmGimp would be useful if it allowed the video component of a DivX file to be imported and reexported without it eventually losing sync with the audio. Let's say I want to titles (and not just subtitles) to the DivX. Or let's say, I shot a digital video, and I want to make a cheap but cool, special FX laden sci-fi web short.
Ah - `homo` as an insult. Why, though? Do you dislike girls also?
the only OS this software supports
Not true. CinePaint runs on Linux (x86), IRIX (SGI MIPS), and Mac OS X. A Windows port is in the works.
"I am the master of the clit!" "No one rules the clit like me!"
-Jay
± 29 dB
"Go get the Gimp" "The Gimp's asleep." "Well you better go wake him up, then." Seriously, HOW many times has this joke been made?
I am Law! You are Crime!