Slashdot Mirror


Free Software Operating Systems for Old Laptops?

X-Nc asks: "I have an old 486 Laptop that does not have a CD drive and , if I remember right, a very small hard disk (a few megs), and maybe 4 megs of RAM. I would like to let my 6 year old son use this for him to play and learn on. What I'd -really- like to do is install Linux or one of the BSD's on it with enough apps to run a simple editor and a few other things. I have other systems that are able to run learning software and games. This would be for him to learn computer fundimentals. I remember in the old days that you could run X11 on this kind of system (my first Linux box was a 386DX-30 with 2meg RAM and a 20 meg HD). I have been digging around in some of the lists of distros to try and find something to load on the system but I can't seem to find one that's right. So, does anyone know of a Free Software (or even commercial) OS that can be installed on such a system that can do more than be just a terminal?"

73 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Slackware by clambake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that this is any help, considering I can't remember the version numbers, but I remember having a slackware box with specs very similar to yours and it ran great. If you look around for some of the 1996-1998 versions, they should all work fairly well on limited hardware. Are there mirrors of old distros out there?

    1. Re:Slackware by unitron · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but if you're a registered user you should default to +1, so one or more of those handful of posts must have been the wrong thing in the wrong thread and incurred the wrath of the Slashgods.

      Anyway, if you're reasonably proficient with Linux, then you could check out http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ to see about putting together an installation with only the stuff you need and save a GigaByte or so of disk space.

      Or just install DOS 6.22 and include a line in autoexec to start up Wolfenstein :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Slackware by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know that Slackware's main site goes back to about Slackware 3 - that might be worth looking at. Old versions of Debian, too. At Debian's site I think you can download *all* the previous versions.

  2. Peanut Linux? by knightwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you looked at peanut linux or maybe slackware? They're usually really small distros. Another option is to search freshmeat. Just a quick search for linux floppy brought up several results for distros that run on one or two floppies. The only trick is the more current versions of X often require a fair amount of space. You might also have to use a really old kernel (i.e. 2.2 series).

  3. RULE? by JCMay · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you thought about RULE?

  4. Well, by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You'll be hard pressed to do anything with less than 40-50MB, but if you've got more than that, just install debian. You should be able to install using PPP over the serial port.

    If you're really low on disk space though, 2.5" 1GB IDE drives can be had for around $20. Less if you're willing to snipe on ebay. If you want to spend $35, you can have a whopping 6GB!

    1. Re:Well, by battjt · · Score: 1

      Debian requires a couple hundred to install without hassles. I just failed to install on a 130MB drive. This ain't the Linux of '93.

      Joe

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
    2. Re:Well, by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I haven't installed debian from scratch since before potato, since I've just been upgrading. The older distributions are still availble though, and I've definatly run debian on a 80MB hard drive before. It didn't seem like that long ago until I just thought about it... Where has all the time since 1996 gone?

    3. Re:Well, by Jon-o · · Score: 1

      Debian is hard to install with less than 16 megs of ram. It's also horribly slow to mess with package installation on a slow computer with small amounts of ram - the packaging system wasn't designed for the 10,000 packages or whatever that are now in sid, and just parsing the database can take ages...

      You might get by, but I think another distro might suit you better... Not sure which one - I'm still looking, myself.

    4. Re:Well, by Zapper · · Score: 1
      should be able to install using PPP over the serial port.

      I would recommend PLIP if you have a parallel port, much faster. PLIP Install HOW TO.

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
  5. Lessee... by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm not entirely sure I understand -- your concern is that you can't find a current distribution that will readily run on this hardware, right?

    How about using an old Linux distro, something from the Red Hat 5.x era? There are a ton of security holes, but given the environment in which this is going to be used (a single 6 year old user, no important data, no networking) who cares if wu-ftpd is vulnerable?

    Run WindowMaker or AfterStep or even that fvwm95 monstrosity Red Hat used to ship and it will be fine.

    I've never seen it, but QNX might be an alternative. Does BeOS support pre-Pentium systems?

    1. Re:Lessee... by MrHanky · · Score: 1
      I've never seen it, but QNX might be an alternative. Does BeOS support pre-Pentium systems?

      No, neither QNX nor BeOS support pre-Pentium computers. I think QNX actually needs a quite fast computer. BeOS runs very well on a Pentium Classic with 32 MB RAM though.

      I think FreeBSD would be fine if you run a smaller implementation of X11 on it. Anyone tried the Tiny-X server on FreeBSD?
    2. Re:Lessee... by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think QNX actually needs a quite fast computer.

      QNX is an embedded OS, it does not require a fast computer. I use QNX (4.25, if anyone cares) everyday, with photon (QNX GUI), and it's pretty snappy on a Pentium 166 with 32MB RAM. My install takes up just under 140MB of drive space, and that includes our custom software.

      No, neither QNX nor BeOS support pre-Pentium computers.

      This may be true for BeOS, but QNX definately supports sub-pentium machines. The current version of Neutrino (6.2.0) supports 386, 486, ARM, MIPS32, and several other CPUs commonly used in embedded systems.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:Lessee... by MrHanky · · Score: 1
      This may be true for BeOS, but QNX definately supports sub-pentium machines. The current version of Neutrino (6.2.0) supports 386, 486, ARM, MIPS32, and several other CPUs commonly used in embedded systems.

      Thanks for clearing that up then. Sorry for misinforming people. I knew older versions of QNX supported even 8086, but I read somewhere that newer versions (those available for free download) needed faster HW. Having checked http://www.qnx.ca I now see that I was wrong.
  6. Windows 95 by perljon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Step1) Format and load Windows 95.
    Step2) Throw some Sid Meiers Colonization on that bad boy
    Step3) ... Step4) Let him play on it for 3 months. Step5) Got to step 1.

    --
    This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    1. Re:Windows 95 by josepha48 · · Score: 1

      ROTFLOL... he said he had 2 Megs of RAM, windows 95 wont run on that. I don't even think it would install on that. Windows 3.1 maybe.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

    2. Re:Windows 95 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      4megs he said...

      i would just hook that computer with something like freedos or some other, and tell him theres this nice place called the-underdogs.org to get games+reviews of older stuff. if he has the hd to spare some linux installation would be nice but finding games for it could be a major bummer compared to dos based system that has dozens and dozens of good classic games available.

      nethack should run on that just as well, even though introducing kids to thing like crack isn't advisable.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Windows 95 by vjl · · Score: 1
      Well, Bill Gates said you could run Win95 on a 386 with 4MB of RAM. Really he did. Here's the exact quote and the URL:

      "You can run Windows 95 on a 386 computer with 4 megabytes of RAM, but we recommend 8 megs for better performance. If you're going to upgrade to more powerful applications, more memory is better. My laptop computer has 12 megs."
      - Bill Gates, August 1995

      Here's the link to the page.

      Amazing, eh?

      /vjl/

    4. Re:Windows 95 by jmt9581 · · Score: 1

      Step1) Format and load Windows 95.
      Step2) Throw some Sid Meiers Colonization on that bad boy
      Step3) ...
      Step4) Let him play on it for 3 months. Step5) Got to step 1.


      Shouldn't step 3 be "profit?"

      --

      My blog

    5. Re:Windows 95 by wik · · Score: 2, Funny

      You actually can do this with 4MB of RAM. I even played solitare on it, too. It was just annoying to watch the mouse driver swap back in when you moved the mouse. :-)

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    6. Re:Windows 95 by josepha48 · · Score: 1

      I would probably look at using picogui as it is designed for small embeded devices. Probably that and Linux. It would require some work I'd imagine, but teh end may be a usable computer.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

    7. Re:Windows 95 by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      You know, that page reinforces my belief that Bill is a 'good guy', even if his business may have some rather shady practices and dodgy products.

      My laptop computer has 12 megs.

      Okay, it was eight years ago, but this still seems hard to believe. I was around then, but I really can't remember the technology limits of the time (I had a 4Mb laptop in 1995!) as memory was expensive.

      Was 12Mb the limit? After all, the richest guy in the world would have as much memory in his laptop as possible, right?

  7. Why Linux? by BortQ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why bother putting Linux on it at all? It seems to me that any OS is good enough for a six year old to play around with.

    There's got to be something installed on the laptop already, so why not just let him use it as is? It will still help him learn about computers.

    Your six year old is not a kernel hacker, and need not be treated as such.

    --

    A Multiplayer Strategy Game for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
    1. Re:Why Linux? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Informative

      I got to thinking about this after I posted my other post ... but actually I think having his six year old start with Linux instead of Windows is a good idea - esp if he is forced to spend lots of time at the command prompt. He is going to learn first impression thought patterns and given the importance of the Un*x os, a good start. I would recommend teaching him the DOS command shell also, although it probably isn't as pervasive anymore.

      Another question might be ... What apps do you actually want to run on the machine? Figure out which applications the six year old is going to run (CivIII was a good suggestion, but I would also recommend Doom I for a machine with 4 megs of RAM)

      Forget Windows95 on a machine with 4Megs. Yes I know it can be done, but that doesn't mean it is a good idea. Win3.1 should run ok on 4M if he doesn't actually want to run any applications.

      What runs on DOS 6.22/Win3.1 w/ 4M RAM?
      IE 3
      Netscape 3
      Borland's Delphi (Pascal with a GUI IDE)
      Borland's C++ Builder (? can't remember)
      Borland's Dashboard (cool shell for Win3.x)
      Doom I and most of Doom II
      The first three levels of Duke Nukem III
      Falcon 3.0
      FreeAgent connected to Usenet, A.B.E.P.*
      A slew of older games
      Foxpro 2.x for DOS
      GWBasic
      688 Attack Sub
      Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe

      Honestly I don't have a clue of available apps for RH 5.x distro ... any ideas?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Why Linux? by MrHanky · · Score: 1
      Sorry. Did you said that you recommend Doom I for a _6_year_ old boy ?

      Doom isn't so bad for a six year old. You're probably confusing it with Quake, which is a bit too difficult. In Doom, you don't have to aim precisely like in modern first person shooters, you just have to shoot in the general direction of the creature you want to kill. If it's too difficult for him, just show him how to get to the shotgun, from then on it's really child's play.

      Doom is probably as good an introduction to FPS's as you can get. The kid learns a bit of important computing history, and he's eased into a genre he surely will be inspired by, both in front of the computer, and when playing with other children.
    3. Re:Why Linux? by Elm+Tree · · Score: 1

      I think the previous poster's problem was with advocating violence to 6 year olds. But then again, I played doom at a young age and it didn't hurt me. At least not all that much... :)

    4. Re:Why Linux? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Ouch, come to think of it ... there were some pretty freaky scenes in Doom. The first time I went into the computer maze (mostly dark, flickering lights, where the first backpack is found in a hidden room) I was half drunk playing in a dark room and that frigging Imp came around the corner and scared the shit out of me ... I had nightmares for months.

      Tip : don't let your six year old play Doom if he has had more than one Crown & Coke (and mix them weak, he's just a little kid.)

      PS - no I don't have any children. I don't have any 486's either, come to think of it.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    5. Re:Why Linux? by thumperward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I got to thinking about this after I posted my other post ... but actually I think having his six year old start with Linux instead of Windows is a good idea - esp if he is forced to spend lots of time at the command prompt. He is going to learn first impression thought patterns and given the importance of the Un*x os, a good start. I would recommend teaching him the DOS command shell also, although it probably isn't as pervasive anymore.


      Hahahaha... hahahaha. Just because children are capable of grasping the most stupidly complex things if they're interested doesn't mean it's a good idea. Nothing I learned poking around Commodore / Sinclair BASIC at age 7 has helped me in my later life. When some stupid problem with the primitive command-line driven piece of crap I like to call a "modern operating system" prevents me from getting any work done, I always have flashback to sitting in front of a (slightly more advanced) editor, cursor blinking at me while I trawl through maybe a thousand lines of code copied from a book to try and get some game to run.

      The only thing that being mocked by a cursor as a child has taught me is that a piece of code, no matter how small or trivial, will always give you an error the first time you try and run it. To be honest, i could have done with waiting until university for that lesson.

      - Chris
    6. Re:Why Linux? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Doom and Duke Nukem for a 6 year old?

      What happened to the good old days of "NIBBLES.BAS"?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    7. Re:Why Linux? by Magus311X · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My first PC was one running Win3.1 with a 486/DX 33MHz, 4M EDO, and I think a 150MB disk. (My first computer was a Commodore 64 though).

      If you can up it to 8M of RAM, you are golden. SimTower, SimCity 2000, SimFarm all ran fine, as Doom.

      Don't throw a 6 year old at a Linux command line. Get him used to something like Win 3.1 and simply get him comfortable using a computer, period. Especially being able to type reasonably well and without having to hunt and peck.

      AFTER that -- he understands directories, files, executables, and can type well, then move him to something else, whatever it may be.
      -----

  8. DOS? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe I am missing the picture here but it sounds like a perfect opportunity for the little guy to spend some time at the command prompt. Even the slowest 486 (a 486sx-25 if I recall correctly, was the slowest 486) is twice as fast as the state of the art machine running when DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1 were king. Seven floppys will contain the install disks of both and easily fit on a 20M hard drive, neither requires a CD-ROM either.

    What's a six year old gonna do on DOS/Win3.x? Bah! Same thing he is going to do a 486 running RedHat 5.x - same thing we all did when we were running 486sx machines with 4M RAM, 20M hard drive and no CD : explore, learn, interact, and come up with a wicked cool powerpoint detailing exactly why he needs a faster machine with a current OS.

    Want a cool upgrade? Assuming the drive is a regular 2.5" laptop drive, or even a regular 3.5" drive shoehorned into a laptop, get one of those adapters that lets you replace it with a Compact Flash card. You can get a 128M card for like $50 or a 64M card for less than $30 (+$10 - $20 for the adapter), install everything onto it and all of a sudden the weakest link (hard drives are fragile, yours is old and fragile) is a solid state device impervious to gravity and 6x as large as it was ...

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:DOS? by jdray · · Score: 1

      Be careful with using CF and an OS that uses swap space. From what I've read, it will burn out the flash from all the read/write/erase cycles in something like a few months.

      Mind you, this "information" is anecdotal, as I haven't gotten a system running on flash yet, but in researching it I ran across quite a few warnings to that effect.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  9. NFS mount by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you can get a network adapter into that puppy, you can install most any version of Linux using a boot floppy and mounting the CD over the network.

  10. Slackware 4.0 by turgid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slackware 4.0 is what you want. It's split into subdirectories so you can put it onto floppies and install that way. I can give you an iso of it. I can also give you an old 3.x (which I have run on a 486 in the dim and distant past). Bear in mind these are ancient distros, so they don't have the latest fancy stuff on them. I think Slackware 7.x is still split into subdirs for floppy installs and is more modern, but much bigger.

    1. Re:Slackware 4.0 by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or install NetBSD. You can even use the current 1.6 release, as the basic NetBSD hasn't 'bloated out' as it's grown, like Linux distros, the 'packages' collection has just grown. The base install is under 100 megs and gives you X11 with the Tab Window Manager, the C compiler and libraries, all the core networking and Unix tools. Then you can selectively bring in other packages. I'd recommend, at most, adding in FVWM1 as a window manager for small machine like that.

      It wasn't that long ago that the 'main' machines most of us were using were 486 machines. The richer of us had 16 megs with those expensive 4M 30 pin simms. The poorer had 8 MB in the smaller one meg simms. My Toshiba Laptop is a 486DX-2 50 MHz, though it has a 'bloated' maximum possible 28Meg of RAM in it. It runs NetBSD with FVWM and all the necessary goodies just fine.

      You want to do things like tune your X by editing ~/.fvwm2rc. Create a virtual desktop that uses all your video memory (I like a 640x880, which uses up all 512K on my machine) so you can pan around your 640x480 'window' into your desktop easily. My Toshiba doesn't have a CD drive, but it's trivial to install NetBSD over NFS if you have a PCMCIA ethernet card and another box set up to serve out the distribution tgz files over NFS. The only 'installation media' you need is a pair of boot floppies from the images here, and the tarballs from here. The installation manual is here.

      Everything you need to download to do a base NetBSD install totals to under 100 MB, so it's even a fairly casual download with a 56K modem.

    2. Re:Slackware 4.0 by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can confirm that -- bought a 486 w/8MB of RAM and a 120 MB hd a while back and successfully installed slackware 7.0 (30MB free, as I recall, and a 20MB swap partition). Slackware, for these purposes (and so many others), rox. Really, I think you'd have a hard time going wrong.

  11. Instead by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do not stick him at a command prompt. Let him discover that like the secret underground passage that it is.

    From lots of personal experience, I suggest instead of asking 'What OS', ask "How can I introduce computers to my 6 year old in a fun way?" And go from there. In other words your solution should be application specific, not OS specific. Games are good. Making his name flash on the screen is good. If you really want him to learn fast lock him out of folders named "Christmas List", "Secrets", etc.

    Reading, computing, microscopes, and ant farms. These things all need to FUN for kids otherwise it's work and kids learn to hate it quickly.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  12. FreeBSD by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's easy to set up a tiny FreeBSD install. You can build a usable and full-featured kernel for your hardware in around 700k so you're not eating up half the memory with locked pages before you've actually done anything. You may have to step back a few versions to get the smallest kernel.

    While X and all may take a little time to start up, FreeBSD performs exceptionally well under low memory situations. It does very little redundant copying, and tunes the swap and scheduling policies as the load increases to try and help keep interactive applications responding smoothly at the expense of some services.

    Many of these features are now in the Linux kernel, but I don't know that it'll be too easy to pack them into a tiny kernel to maximize the amount of pageable memory for applications.

    1. Re:FreeBSD by mcgroarty · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, OpenBSD and NetBSD can likely accomplish this as well. I only named FreeBSD because I helped a friend set up a 6 meg system for his kids a few years back, and it performed admirably, despite the low clockspeed and tight memory.

    2. Re:FreeBSD by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      I can get a decent minimalistic 2.4 kernel in about 400k compressed.

      400k compressed doesn't help. It still needs to be decompressed in order to be run.

    3. Re:FreeBSD by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      FreeBSD didn't install in 4M of RAM in 1997, so you'd have to go back more than a few versions

      The default installer disk suggested 8mb, but worked with less. For a 4mb notebook, it might come down to installing on an alternate machine then dropping the drive in, but it'll definitely run.

  13. Sounds just below the usable range... by jensend · · Score: 1

    A few megs of HD and 4MB RAM? A 486 is enough to do X, but you'll want to have at least 8 megs of RAM, and you would really benefit from having 16 or even 32 MB. Furthermore, though you may be able to fit an X installation on a HD of just a few megs (see 2diskxwin, Small Linux), I don't think you'll be able to do much of use with it unless you have a hard drive which is at least 30 MB or so.

    I personally don't have any experience trying to use X in an installation smaller than 120 MB. If you can get this much, you might try doing what I did: install the latest ZipSlack, then move it to ext2 and add X.

  14. do a used update first by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    --find out how far you can go with the ram, update that, max it out used. That old of RAM you can find the ram *cheap*. You want it maxed. Buy a used hardrive of a gig or 2 or something like that. Borrow an external cd rom drive, or have the guy at the white box shop do it, ask to use his. Plug that in, put up with the slowness. Install something new like peanut or latest mandrake, pick and choose options, etc, and just put up with the speed of it, after all it's your kid gonna be using it mostly. Use a "you make it" window manager instead of guhhnome or k-thisandthat.

    And there ya go! Proly take ya all freekin day and nite day to install it, but then you'll have it. ram might cost ya 5 bucks, a one gigger whatever drive maybe 10$. PLUS, junior gets to see hardware upgrading! It's part of geekdom! It ain't all typing and starin at the screen, there's important SCREWDRIVER action young lads need to learn! BLESS my dad for getting me REAL tools when I was a kid instead of those plastic toy tools. I got his grade b stuff he didn't want, some he cut down to size or picked for size, but they were *real* tools made outta 'murican steel like God intended. And I got old radios and busted lawnmowers and woodscraps and odd chunks of metallic things and stuff to dork with. Cool beans! I was building stuff and tearing apart crap before I could read all that well. Now I ain't askeered of nuthin, even though I still bork half or more of my junker projects.

  15. Minix? by pbrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    A simple search on Google would result your answer, but in the spirit of helping, you could look at Minix.

  16. Have done exactly this with Debian 2.2 by profBill · · Score: 2, Informative
    I did exactly what you are describing using Debian 2.2. The machine is an old laptop with a Cyrix 486 (which is really a 386 equivalent), 4Mb of memory and a 100Mb disk. I couldn't get any connection process to work, so I did it all by floppy. I gave it to my 10 year old daughter to play with (she just wanted the BSD games). If she wants something new, I download it, put the package on the floppy then installed it . She doesn't really need it, but I did it just to see if it could be done. Oh, and X11? No way, couldn't get it to work with that little space (but I didn't reach back to very old X11 distro's either).


    As for her learning about computers, that wasn't the goal. But she at least knows there is something there besides the family windows box.

  17. Check out NEW DEAL INC by iocat · · Score: 1

    Although I think they are out of business now, NEW DEAL INC made something called NEW DEAL OFFICE which was a GEOS-like office suite for old DOS machines. It was really good. You can find it on eBay for ~$20 and it is definitely worth checking out. Lots of old GEOS guys worked on it. -Chris

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    1. Re:Check out NEW DEAL INC by iocat · · Score: 1

      Here's a good link that explains New Deal. Apparently it *was* GEOS.... http://dougspc.uts.ohio-state.edu/t100xndo.htm -Chris

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  18. Try ZipSlack by gordie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Slackware http://www.slackware.com has a very small distro called zipslack. Should serve your purpose (I've used it myself on a very old 386 based laptop).

    From the web site: "ZipSlack is a special edition of Slackware Linux that can be installed onto any FAT (or FAT32) filesystem with about 100 MB of free space. It uses the UMSDOS filesystem and contains most of the programs you will need. This means that you do not need to repartition your hard disk if you already have DOS or Windows installed. ZipSlack installs into a directory on your DOS filesystem. It can also be installed to and booted from a Zip disk.

    This distribution is ideal for people who don't have a lot of hard disk space, do not have a fast Internet connection to download the entire distribution, or who want a Linux distribution they can carry around on a Zip disk."

  19. Do him a favor.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spend $30 and buy him a baseball mitt and ball. Go out and play catch with him. Kids spend way too much time in front of the TV, Video Games, Computer, etc.

    He will thank you in 20 years when he's not a big, fat, Socially inept geek.

  20. 6 Year old laptop? by Odie_flocon · · Score: 1

    From the sounds of it your laptop is as old as your son. I can relate to your dilemma. I find that my 6 year old would be playing with something else because it takes too long to load. I love Linux but to tell you the truth I havn't found alot of programs that are suitable for his age. they are just learning how to read, and spell and stuff like that. I would run something like PXES http://pxes.sourceforge.net/ A nice thin client that doesn't require alot of horse power. and can run both Xwindows, and Terminal services. That way you still get to use your old hardware. without the huge loss of speed etc. either that or buy him a real computer. you gotta remember by the time he's 8 or 10 he'll have probably be way ahead of what you were when you first started using a computer. BTW, My four year old asks less questions on how to use my computer then my wife does.

  21. Small Linux? Freedos? by Drasil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a bunch of old laptops so I have had the same problem as you. There is Small Linux but that didn't really suit me at the time. You can forget installing any other Linux distro on anything with less than 4Mb of RAM, although I would say Slackware is the best of the bunch when it comes to hardware requirements.

    In the end I opted for Freedos for a 386 with 2Mb that my 5 year old son plays with. It's not UNIX, but it's much more UNIX-like than any other DOS I have used. There are also many educational programs and games that are available for free download.

    Hope this helps.

  22. A few weird tries by eexlebots · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....well, there's FreeDOS, right? Could try that. TinyBSD's a good candidate, supposedly. Need a window manager...mebbe X comes with TinyBSD...I dunno, I think FreeGEM might be able to run on top of it (?). Man, this is kind of rough. One recommendation: get something that is fun for your kid. Some simple-as-all-heck games like Tetris, a paint program, you know; something kids like to play with. The paint program on my old Tandy1000 was all that kept me going some days. It was fun even without a mouse.

    --
    ***
  23. Build your own? by danlyke · · Score: 1

    I'm using Via Eden boards for various embedded systems (motion controller, an Ogg Vorbis player for the house, and so forth), and with great trepidation sat down to build my own installs from source code.

    It really isn't that hard.

    First off, get an SFF to standard IDE adapter so you can put the hard disk in your main computer and copy stuff to it rather than having to copy stuff around on floppies 'til you get a network drive up. Costs you $20, you'll end up using it a few more times, I guarantee.

    Mount that drive, create the basic file system (for me with a stripped down 2.4.19 kernel it was /boot, /bin, /dev, /dev/cciss, /etc, /lib, /opt, /proc, /sbin, /tmp, /var, /usr, /bin, /lib, and /etc/init.d, although I was using BusyBox for my utilities, more complex init situations will want more in /etc).

    In your "/etc/lilo.conf" (on this new drive) do a "disk=/dev/hde" (or wherever the new drive ends up on your disk chain) and a "bios=0x80") to tell it that you're wanting to boot off the first BIOS drive, everything else as you normally would.

    Then just use "ldd" to check what dependencies are for various files and copy 'em over.

  24. DOS and/or GEOS! by RevAaron · · Score: 1

    On this kind of machine, I'd just install DOS. I think you could get a lot more use out of it relative to the work you'd have to put in to getting Linux working on it much at all. I for one would skip Windows entirely. Win 3.1 is horrible on any hardware. ...but then again, maybe I am just being nostalgic because I cut my teeth as a youngster under DOS. I miss it somedays, feel like trading in this iBook for a 400 MHz or so PC for running DOS. :P There are still a fair amount of useful and fun software floating around for DOS. You could do MS-DOS 6.2 or FreeDOS. From what I've heard (but not positive) FreeDOS's comatability is pretty good.

    Also, you could put OS/2 2.1 on it. If you're interested, I have the original box with manuals, along with 21 disks! Oh wait- that'll require a good 30 MB of HD space. But I did used to run it on a 486 sx/25 with 4 MB of RAM. It was a lot faster and more stable than Win 3.1 on the same machine. ;)

    GEOS is quite nice. Again, ran it on a 386 SX and 486 SX with 4 MB of RAM. Ran pretty well. You can get a lot of software for it, relatively at least. Check out BreadBox. You can get web browsers, irc and AIM clients, games, etc. Download GeoWorks Ensemble for FREE! Quite nice- choose between a Win95 or Motif look! :) On the same download page, you can get an Infocom games interpreter as well! Best thing in the world for a 6-yo- helluva lot better than starting him on Doom!

    If you're willing to spend some money, you could get Breadbox's New Deal Office- same core as Ensemble Lite, but with a lot of bundled apps. Pretty well done, runs on almost anything.

    You could also run... MINIX!

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    1. Re:DOS and/or GEOS! by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Whoops- sorry aobut the screwed up link. If you would like to see screenshots of NewDeal Office, check out this. NDO even comes with its own free VB-like IDE... everything your kid needs in one package. Programming, games, and more, with a very minimal time setting up and little HD space needed.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  25. Or 2 Disk X Windows, Trinux, ... by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Any of the micro distros will work fine. You can also look for old distros from around the time of your hardware was new.

  26. that's a good idea by zogger · · Score: 1

    --will that still then work back into the 486? I'm interested in this thread because I got given an older toshiba laptop, a pentium 1, 100 speed, with "just a floppy" and a borked hard drive. Want another linux machine of some kind, or bsd or whatever. Not real interested in reinstalling 95 on it, and will put up with the speed loss I guess. And those burn one floppy then download for two months on my rural dialup and coal burner modem just ain't gonna happen. Was wondering how to do it easier than getting an external cd drive or some serial port connection, that sounds easier by far, now I wonder if it being a laptop that it won't work. Hmmm.. I never even looked yet, are laptop hard drive drive connections the same as desktops? I need to use my own advice and open that thing up, it's been sitting on a junque pile long enough I guess... projects, projects, projects..... whoo boy, spring gardening season too....

  27. OpenBSD by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
    Since everyone else has pitched theirs, my two choices would be OpenBSD and some flavor of DOS. OpenBSD installs quite easily from a boot floppy if you can get the networking going. (Good luck with that on an old laptop). OpenBSD will run somewhat in 4 megs. Just don't try to compile anything big.

    My first choice would really be MS-DOS or PC-DOS or DR-DOS or FreeDOS. There is a huge amount of software. It is much easier to find DOS drivers for old laptops than it is BSD or Linux. If you really want to get fancy, search for Desqview/X and give it a try.

  28. BasicLinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have a look at BasicLinux 1.8
    http://www.volny.cz/basiclinux

    There is a version for 4mb RAM.
    It uses a 2.0 kernel and libc5.

    5mb BasicLinux HD foundation
    12mb X (with icewm)
    1mb xfreecell
    15mb C compiler

    33mb TOTAL

  29. thanks! by zogger · · Score: 1

    --thanks man! Logical and makes sense and I'll remember the tips!

  30. Simple by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    Teach him the delete command.

    He'll learn real fast that way.

    It's probably the reason I'm doing anything with computers today.

    ("YOU DID **WHAT** WITH OUR NEW $3000 COMPUTER??")

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  31. FreeDOS, not Linux by iankerickson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He doesn't need Linux at his age. Kids can barely concentrate on one thing at time, unless they themselves want to. IOW, he's not going to multitask (not yet).

    Consider FreeDOS. It may or may not work on your old laptop. But if it does, all you need is to
    - Add a menuing system
    - Set up a nice autoexec.bat to handle all the sound, mouse, and screen setting, and to drop the PC into the menu
    - Collect some abandonware or free DOS games or educational software

    I used to have an old Thinkpad. With DOS, it ran great. With Linux, it also ran great... until you loaded the X window system.

    I second the ideas here to either upgrade the hard disk with a newer laptop IDE drive, or to use CompactFlash.

    --
    Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
    1. Re:FreeDOS, not Linux by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      Consider FreeDOS.

      Then consider loading this on it (it can also be configured as menuing system). An earlier version was included in the FreeDOS distro, but I don't think that version played MP3's

      If you can then link him into the house network (The Arachne browser comes with a freeware TCPIP stack for DOS), he can surf the web, and check email with it.

  32. Use it as an X Terminal by darnok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know your original message said something about using an OS "other than a terminal", but you might consider bringing it up as an XTerm. From the wording of your question, I'm guessing that you've got a more modern Linux box somewhere that you yourself use, so why not install your kid's apps on that and let him run riot accessing it via an XTerm?

    Advantages:
    - given that you'll probably be installing Linux and X on the old laptop anyway, it should be easier to install just enough to have it run as an Xterm, rather than having to install several games, drawing programs, etc. into limited space
    - you'll probably get more life out of it, given that there's very little that's going to have to change on it once it's up and going properly
    - you can send him cute messages from your other PC (don't underestimate how exciting kids find this!)
    - very little software on his PC means very little to go wrong
    - if/when he breaks or outgrows it, you can quickly get another clunker PC and bring it up as another XTerm

    Disadvantages:
    - you'll need a network card, which you may or may not have in this laptop. It should be pretty cheap to track down an old Xircom or something similar

    FWIW, my two boys (6 and 4) have been playing games and surfing Web sites on one of my Linux PCs for years - basically, they started "helping" me work before they could walk. There's lots of games and drawing programs out there if you look around. They're yet to show OTT geek tendencies, or any inability to use a MS OS, as far as I can detect - you should be safe!

  33. RedHat 6.2 by gukin · · Score: 1

    Okay, maybe RH 6.2 isn't exactly the funnest bestest OS ever but RH (for about two more weeks) is supporting it and it wasn't the GF that 7.0 was. So, if you can track down a supported (read OLD) NIC, do a network install THEN install all the patches RH has provided. You'll wind up with a fairly modern system, you can compile some light web browsers (such as links & dillo.) you can run lyx, latex & tex (if you've got patience & disk space.) and maybe even quake (bleh, quake on a non-TFT display.) I've got two 486 notebooks (20 Mb of RAM and 300-500 Mb of disk) and they did quite well. . . until I tried wireless networking (boy does a PCI bus make a difference there)

    Still, Debian, slackware etc Linux is your best bet.

    Good luck.

  34. Several things you can run by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Freedos, VsTA, PicoBSD, FBSD, im sure tones more..

    X will be dismal, ( even with remote apps ) but it will work. FBSD will be a tad better then linux due to the VM, but still irratating...

    FBSD will install across the wire.. all you need is ethernet + floppy..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. OpenDOS 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have him run OpenDOS or FreeDOS. There are a
    TON of applications and games for DOS freely
    available. In fact, I am posting this response
    on the following: OpenDOS 7.1 and Arachne web
    browser 1.7. I am connected using my DSL
    connection (through an Etherlink III nic). The
    packet drivers etc.. are provided with the
    browser. This version of DOS has some
    multitasking capabilities built in, along with a
    cool game (Netwars). I also have an office
    suite/operating environment called New Deal
    (based on GEOS) that is fully GUI. I recently
    downloaded and installed an SSH2 client for this
    machine and can log in to my Linux box with no
    problem. I have Microsoft's network client
    installed, which allows me to browse shares on
    my local workgroup. This box can play all
    manner of audio and video (mp3, divx, mpeg,
    etc...) using my 1MB video card and SB16.

    Programming stuff: Turbo C, Turbo Pascal, QB4.5, Pacific C
    Turbo C++, NASM, Euphoria, WABA (small DOS
    Java), DJGPP (gcc for DOS).

    Applications: CAD (2D), NeoPaint, WordStar 5, Pedit (great
    DOS editor) Flow Chart (Visio for DOS), and more.

    The games. Oh, the games. Doom, DoomII, Quake,
    Descent, SimCity, One Must Fall, Red Baron, Duke
    Nukem, Wolf3D, Stunts, and on and on.

    Im running a P133 with 64meg of RAM, which is
    HUGE overkill for this system. Ive had this
    all running happily on a 386 with 4 meg of RAM.
    The 486 system should be fine. Oh, the things
    mentioned above should fit in about 100 Meg of
    space. I have a ton of other stuff on this
    machine, and it takes up about 300meg.

    Finally, all things mentioned above are FREE and
    available for download. www.simtel.net is a
    great resource, otherwise just type "DOS
    Software" into google and the other major
    download sites will come up.

  36. Old Laptop, lightweight OS by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

    I have a laptop similar to this one, except the specifications are almost double. It is a 486dx2/66 with 8 MB RAM, and a 125MB HDD. DR-DOS 7.03 runs rather well on this for the core OS, as does Windows 3.11 for Workgroups for a GUI. If you do not feel like supporting MS (which you would not nessesarily be doing, because Windows 3.11 is freely available on many abandonware sites. But if you have a moral objetion to running abandonware, you can also use Seal Desktop 2.

    Seal is available on Sourceforge.net, and is very decent. DR-DOS is free for personal use, but unless you purchase a lisence to use it, there is no support. You do not need to purchase it though. If you go here, you can get it completly free.

  37. Ditto by dk4 · · Score: 1

    Back in 96-98 or so, when I was VP at golf.com, we had 1/2 dozen Slackware 4.x machines running on 486s that happily pulled down various newsfeeds, with relatively few issues. One was even on a Laptop with a PCMCIA ethernet card. 'course we also had a Netware 3.11 server on a 486, and it ran even better...

  38. TinyX by H4326137 · · Score: 1

    You could always try running a minimal linux distribution with tinyX or smallX with ratpoison or icewm.

  39. Why not dig out an old 8 bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wrote my 1st game at the age of 7 on a ZX Spectrum (Timex 2000 to you amaricans out there) ... I think teh best thing you could do is either get an old 8 bit machine or set up a linux box so it boots straight into a simple BASIC interpreter and give him a few pieces of code to type in himself (anyone remeber the days of magazines with source for you type in yourself? good learning stuff), print out a few tutorials (in a big enough point size) and print out a complete reference - From around 8 to 10 years old i think my most-thumbed book was the BBC BASIC Users Guide!!!

    but if he shows no interest in the comp, at least get him some mindstorms lego!

    P.S. there was definitly nothing scary about a command prompt to me when i was 7!!

  40. MuLinux or PicoBSD by Kramer747 · · Score: 1

    Try either
    MuLinux
    or
    PicoBSD
    to get started with a minimilist distro. Pico BSD runs on a single floppy, and I think MuLinux requires at least two. Onoe advantage of MuLinux is that it can actually run X after a few more floppys. I had both of these running at one point on a Laptop w/ 8 megs of ram.

    Enjoy.

  41. old laptop by klasj · · Score: 1

    I dont understand why so many people keep nagging Cliff his choice of making something useful with his old laptop. I find it to be a very sane question. Many people have old hardware useless to current OS. But are they really useless? No. I think the best way to go is to install a vnc-client on the machine. You can find one for DOS. Vnc is a PC-anywhere-style system that you can use to connect to other computers. Vnc-servers exist for both Xwindows and Windows GUI. I that way you can use the old laptop as a graphial terminal and connect to either a Linux or a Windows-computer.