Slashdot Mirror


Wired's Wish List For 2013

jpt.d writes "Wired has a nice article on what they wish to be for 2013. It is not too far fetched either! My personal favorite is the roll up television screen made of light-emitting-polymer. How about another Apple gadget? Their first item is an iPhone bracelet, including the functionality of a 'PDA, wireless Internet, a mini iPod, and, of course, a phone.' Notice the Apple logo in the picture." I'd settle for ubiquitous unmetered wireless network access.

65 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. April 2003 by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It really is an article about the future!

  2. X^2 by absurdhero · · Score: 4, Funny

    you know, that X squared OS by Apple they show on the 2013 wristband is nicknamed Parabola.

    1. Re:X^2 by Peterus7 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hmm, in the year 2013, I want a macintosh bionic implant.

      "Yeah, I was purely organic, and it was alright. I was weak though, and I needed rest. And then I switched, to Apple cyborging. Then and there I was benching 1000 lbs, I could run forever, and I could do any activities without error. The only feedback is I can't go out in the rain. But oh well, I never liked the rain anyways. And at least I don't get the blue screen of death flashing in front of my eyes like those windows cyborgs!" Apple.com/switch

  3. Utility Run Internet Access by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BY 2013, we need to have net access (whether wireless or wired) run like a utility rather than a commodity. There is no need to have companies like Sprint trying to make a killing by artifically restricting what really should be a near-limitless resource (bandwidth).

    Let the gov't run the backbones.

    1. Re:Utility Run Internet Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moderators on drugs? That crap gets a +4?

      Companies like Sprint do not artificially limit bandwidth. Have you ever price a T3 that crosses a state line? The high cost of long-distance data lines is most of the cost of bandwidth. As long as the Bell monopolies can charge huge prices and states can add huge taxes, bandwidth will remain expensive.

    2. Re:Utility Run Internet Access by unborracho · · Score: 2, Funny

      couldn't possibly agree more. if i had moderator points today, i'd definately mod this one up. There really is no good reason there should be limits on bandwidth until we run out of.. oil or whatever the hell we use to make optic pipes.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
    3. Re:Utility Run Internet Access by eatdave13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, I'll provide you with unlimited internet access, all the bandwith you can handle. All you need to do is pay the 100 unionized (read: expensive) workers and 10 internet backbone qualified (read: very expensive) techs it will take to build and maintain the connection.

      Oh yeah, don't forget, if you want your traffic to leave my network you have to pay the backbones that carry your data to its destination.

      Or, you could just quit whining about something you know nothing about and continue paying the $40 a month you pay now that barely pays for your service. Oh, wait. You're a slashbot. You have SETI-at-home and Gnuella running 24/7, and Gentoo RC3 just came out. You're probably costing your ISP money, and it's your grandparents that use their high speed internet access to check their e-mail that are actually paying for your service and theirs.

      Why don't we just go to metered internet access? You can pay your bill of $150/month and your grandparents can pay $20/month.

      Or you could just shut up and console yourself with the fact that they are paying for your internet access with the Social Security money they started getting at 65 that you won't see 'till you're 80 if ever.

      Wake up, dumbass.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    4. Re:Utility Run Internet Access by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen. If the guvmint had run the fiber rollout the way it regulated power (before dereg nuked us -- CA says thanks!) we'd have fiber to our homes and pay far less per month than we do now or will pay in the future.

      The free market cannot, by strict profit motivation, fiber up the nation. Corporate nature will go for maximum profit for minimum rollout costs -- which is why power grids and phone companies are regulated monopolies. And those regulated businesses do just fine, and everyone gets electricity and phone servce.

      And yes, high speed and nearly infinite bandwidth is a necessity. It nukes attempts to corner the entertainment industry. It provides cheap telecom. It enables nearly everything.

      Bandwidth IS NOT EXPENSIVE. It has been MADE expensive. Growing profit depends on controlling supply for a demand. By artificially making bandwidth dear, we suffer as citizens while rapidly consolidating corporations make out like bandits, and plot to grab even more.

      Is a corporation entitled to endlessly growing profit? Let's try: NO.

      Corporations are legal fictions that were originally intended to help create a better world for us all by shielding investors from personal liability. Business and corporations exist to serve the common good. When they do not, they have violated their mandate.

      I know this be heresy in this radically right wing business era, but it is true. The people, all of us, license corporations to exist for our benefit. We do not exist to serve their interests. One way is a democracy promoting business; the other, neo-feudalism.

      I once did an analysis on Slashdot providing calculations on a government-rolled-out telecom network versus the current private rollout. And I found that we have spent an order of magnitude too much money for services that are shoddy and hard-to-get.

      The people benefiting from the private sector rollout of "expensive bandwidth" are the rapidly monopolizing telecom companies. We, the people who they allegedy serve, are being squeezed. We are being convinced that they are doing us a favor by providing us with 100kbs pipes -- while they are milking us blind.

      There are towns across the US that are rolling their own telecom. Guess what? Fat pipes, low cost, no bullshit. And with new wireless tech coming up, we won't need wires for a lot of it.

  4. Internet access by bm_luethke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I too would settle for unlimited wireless internet access everywhere. While we are at it I would settle for a few million and a supermodel wife who is also a contortionist.

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  5. apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've never really cared much for apple products, but damn i want that watch...though there may be problems with the scroll/whatever action if the motion detector always responds to quick wrist motions :)

  6. instead of using "sound recognition technology by Error27 · · Score: 4, Funny

    just put a blasted alarm clock in them...

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:instead of using "sound recognition technology by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way the ear plugs were described in the article, it sounds as if its more then just for getting a good night's sleep. Instead, you could set them to only hear one person, and then put them in, and have a decent conversation in an incredibly crowded room. Or you could set them to listen to a movie, so when someone's cell phone went off, you wouldn't hear it. Etc, etc.

    2. Re:instead of using "sound recognition technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like Bush Junior is already using these... he's tuned out the protesters, the United Nations, and the only voice he can hear is his daddy saying "kill them all, W... kill them all..."

  7. Robot Slave by ufoman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope by 2013 I can own a robot that will get first post on /.

    --
    The following statement is false.
    The previous statement is true.
    Welcome to my world.
    1. Re:Robot Slave by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, where are the damn robot servants? The ones who can cook/clean/fetch beer.

      Also, wheres the AI programs that can run errands for me, like pay the bills online, record my TV shows, remind me about important dates. Oh, an AI lawyer and account would be nice too.

      The cars that can drive themselves, and let me read a book on the way to work.

      With dual incomes becoming the norm just to live in the USA, where are the time saving robot/AI programs to give us more time to spend with the family. Work a ten hour day, commute for 2 hours, sleep for 8, doesnt leave much time to eat dinner with the family and and wind down from work.

    2. Re:Robot Slave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hope by 2013 that GNU/Hurd will see a 1.0 release.

    3. Re:Robot Slave by Dicky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, wheres the AI programs that can run errands for me, like pay the bills online, record my TV shows, remind me about important dates. Oh, an AI lawyer and account would be nice too.

      Well, I've got an 'AI system' which records TV shows for me - even suggests new shows it thinks I may like, based on what I've recorded before. It's called TiVo. And I've got an 'AI system' which reminds me about important dates. It's called a web calendar. Oh, and apart from a very small number of bills, I pay everything except for my credit card bill using Direct Debit. Okay, it's not AI, but they do get paid automatically, and I track them (and pay my credit card bill) online...

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
  8. Combination devices... by singularity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with all of these combination devices is that no device is going to do everything well. I have a somewhat small wrist and larger watches seem huge. At the same time, I want a large color display for my PDA.

    These two things work against each other.

    The display on my phone is not important (especially if I can use it as a simple modem for my PDA), but the button size is. I do not want a combination PDA and phone (think Treo and others) since I want a small phone (since I carry that on me at all times) and will take a somewhat larger PDA since I can choose to carry that or not.

    So I want a small display phone with non-small buttons.
    I want a PDA with a large color display (I currently have at Clie 665c to give an example).
    I want a small watch with small buttons (I have a Nike Triax 42)
    I want a small camera with a decent display and good optics (I have a Canon S200)
    I want a MP3 player with a decent display and small size (I have an iPod)

    One thing I really want is a Bluetooth-like personal network. If I pull out my PDA, I want it to sense my cell phone in my pocket and use it to connect to the internet. I want my PDA to recognize my camera and download pictures from that. if I have a laptop with me, I want it to do the same thing.

    So available wireless internet is one thing, but I would rather have workable, wireless personal networks (meaning on my body).

    Even better would be the ability to have a neetworked storage device somewhere (wallet, etc) that could work as a networked storage device for everything else I am carrying at once. No more carrying a 10gig iPod, a PDA with a 128meg MemoryStick and a camera with a 128meg CompacFlash card. Ideally the iPod would simply be used as storage by all devices without wires.

    This would allow easy modularity without trying to pack everything into once device.

    [If someone tries to patent this idea in the future, I suppose my idea cannot be used as prior art. I think I have to actually implement the idea, right? Any non-lawyers out there want to comment?]

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  9. Drawing on your retina makes a lot of sence by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe Wired is right on the spot when it comes to a screen technology incorporated into a pair of glasses. It's really the only thing that makes sense when you need your hands.

    But it's not just for athletes. Technology like that is already being used in medicine (look up stuff while you operate), and I believe that when you couple it with GPS navigation you could do way cool navigational aids (think drawing arrows on the ground, you just follow).

    I've been waiting for this a long time already... why can't it be ready now? ;)

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  10. How about.... by tankdilla · · Score: 5, Funny
    A few things i'd like to see by 2013....
    Pets that eat poop instead of make it (Thus creating a circle of life between real and artificial pets.)

    A 300 GHz computer with 64 GB of RAM that won't skip or delay even if it wanted to.

    Reassurance that 1 term of a Bush in charge and bad economic times can equate to 2 terms of some other guy in charge for 2 terms and good economic times, and an occasional scandal that keeps things interesting.....

    Oh yeah, world peace and smell-o-vision.

    --

    -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

  11. Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    10 years ago I was posting messages to BBSs with a 14.4k modem, a 14" monitor and a 7MHz PC.
    OK, Internet is a bigger BBS, my modem is 4x faster I've got a 17" monitor and my PC is 50x faster.

    In ten years expect things will remain much the same but bigger again. Maybe I'll surf Internet2 at 250k, have a 24" monitor? My PC may even run at 20GHz

  12. iPhone user interface by rf0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who sees a problem with the interface of something like the iPhone. Taking it is going ot go round you wrist the only reasonable interfaces are very small button, or voice recognition. Button would be to small and I don't like the idea of having to stand in the street shouting "Ring Wife".

    Also how do you speak? Do you have to shout at the braclet or will you have to hold it up to your ear and look like a prat? OK it does have an earphone but its still a fun image :)

    Rus

    1. Re:iPhone user interface by n3k5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 'interface of something like the iPhone' exists in the wild for years and is used without any problems at all. For example, when I 'stand in the street' and want to call my wife, I can leave my tiny phone where it is and just plug a tiny headset into my ear, activate it with a press on the single button it has and say 'ring wife' very quietly. Also when speaking to my wife, I don't have to shout. I certainly don't have to hold anything to my ear and I absolutely don't look like a prat.

      What the iPhone idea really is about is that you have your PDA with net access and MP3 player in the same device (so far devices like this already exist), AND have all of that in a tiny device that doesn't encumber you and even looks like a fashionable accessory. I need to put my phone and PDA into pockets and take care that they don't get lost or stolen. Having them around my wrist and thus always 'at hand' would be a great improvement.

      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  13. OS X in 2013?! by k-0s · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long are they planning to go between upgrades? Seriously though, most of that stuff seems awesome, others seem useless or overkill. Are athletes going to take their eyes off the finish line or competitors to see what their heart rate is? I do want the wrap around TV though...i'd make my room into Quake 8 by then.

  14. hey now by Rhinobird · · Score: 3, Funny

    640MB of RAM is enough memory for anybody.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  15. Hopefully by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the end of the combustion engine.
    Sigh..

    1. Re:Hopefully by happyhippy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Knowing the US itll be more like SUV's the size of dump trucks.

    2. Re:Hopefully by GimmeFuel · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's 2003 and we already have SUVs the size of dump trucks. By 2013 the smallest SUV will be roughly the size of a train.

    3. Re:Hopefully by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen! I've befriended you because this is the first time I've seen an anti-SUV post on /. outside of my own in the past. SUVs are such a stupid and inappropriate thing in this day and age. But stupid and insecure people in America seem to need these vehicles to soothe their egos without regard to the damage they cause.

      -Buying SUVs supports terrorism in a BIG way since those gas guzzling mosters put money in the hands of the criminals doing horrible things worldwide. If they were true patriots, they would stop buying SUVs and demand that our auto industry provide us with alternative fuels.
      -Damaging the environment seems to not matter to these fools as well. So what if their grand children or great grand children won't bea ble to play outside because it's too polluted. It doesn't directlry affect them. Selfish bastards.

      And then when you confront these idiots with these facts, they get all defensive because they don't want to think about it and hope that some solution will magically appear. Well you know what idiot! You're wrong. It won't! And YOU are a huge part of the problem!

      Fuck the war for oil... What we need is a war on US business. Force the auto industry out of business so that someone else can come in to replace it. We need alternative fuels, better mass transportation, and in the end... electric cars. The money being spent on this ridiculous conflict in Iraq would be better spent on re-tooling the auto industry for electric cars, fuel cells and charging station infrastructure. Imagine that... being free of the middle eastern grip. That whole part of the world would be relegated to status: irrelevant. They could nuke each other off the planet for all we care.

    4. Re:Hopefully by rbuysse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like the Mammoth Car on Speed Racer?

      --
      An infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters still wouldn't repost stories on /.
  16. Re:Whoopee... by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I found a 17" monitor next to a dumpster recently. Really, it was better than most of my old ones. It's amazing the useful things people throw out simply because something "better" has come along.

    I also noticed a PC in the dumpster one time but I decided to pass on thatt one.

  17. wrap-around tv is already here by trelanexiph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a bit of work (And hopefully photos of my new house and this setup upcoming) a wraparound TV isn't all that impossible. Using a wrapping screen and an LCD projector this should be only minimally hard to achive. I'll post pictures when/if I get this working in my new house. I'm thinking of throwing the front speakers BEHIND the wrapping screen so they aren't in the way.

  18. isn't history supposed to be repeating itself? by tankdilla · · Score: 2, Interesting
    After watching the Flintstones, I think history is long overdue for repeating itself. Remember those witty dinosaur appliances that made comments after being used, like "It's a living." I'd like to see some little computerized vending machines or toilets chiming in every once in awhile (i.e "You should be drinking Coke not Pepsi" or "Damn what have you been eating???") It would brighten everyone's day and help us make the transition from the Flintstones to the Jetsons.

    --

    -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

  19. self-darkening contacts won't work by trelanexiph · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds cool, but really it's not going to be easy, or desirable. The automatic darkening lenses are nowhere near perfect, and don't notice sunlight but UV light. Ask anyone who wears them in a car, they don't darken because the windows/windshield have a UV coating. Quite frankly in combination with the HUD display, I'd like to see what electronics can be built into sunglasses in the future. obvious note: IANADR (I am not a Doctor, but I work with an optical lab where doctors write perscriptions for these lenses)

  20. Shurely Shome Mishtake by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When did government ever do anything better, cheaper, quicker than industry? Net access will stay in the private sector because any government can't afford to make it public for a list of reasons starting with 'they can't afford it' and running through to 'they'll fuck it up anyway'.

    Net access is a commodity already - pretty soon it will be a utility in the same way petrol stations are. Think petrol stations - not roads. I dont have to sign an exclusive lock in 12 month deal with shell to fill up my tank - and soon enough I wont have to sign up to a long deal for access either - hopefully.

    The question is - is 2013 soon!!!

    1. Re:Shurely Shome Mishtake by unborracho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed the point of what the author of the comment was trying to say. He acknowledged that net access is indeed a comodity, which seemed to be a point that you were refuting (maybe you didn't mean to come across the way, but that's how i percieved it).

      I would think though, that by adding more pipes throught the U.S., would just create more tech jobs and that internet would eventually come to the point where phone service is now, that companies actually start to compete over high-speed lines (in my city the only service you can really get it roadrunner, or pay a FORTUNE for a high-end dsl line).

      We just need to keep laying those fiberoptic wires across america, and it'll come, all in good time.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
  21. Old and bitter by Vollernurd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sitting here in my slippers typing by the light of an oil lamp, I wish for nothing more than:

    1) A mobile phone that works properly;
    2) Digital TV that works properly;
    3) A DSL modem where the drivers have not been coded by sadists;
    4) Good health;
    5) Peace and quiet.

    I must be getting old before my time.

    Now where's my cocoa?...

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    1. Re:Old and bitter by Wirr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You should consider moving to Germany.

      1) A mobile phone that works properly;


      Our mobile phones work flawlessly for at least 10 years now. 100% coverage and full interoperability between the diferent providers. And of course SMS and MMS.

      2) Digital TV that works properly;


      I'm using digital TV for at least 5 years now. It is fully standarized and works flawlessly including an electronic program guide on all channels.

      3) A DSL modem where the drivers have not been coded by sadists;



      You can get DSL nearly everywhere in Germany, and the drivers while not exactly works of art work quite well. I prefer hardware routers with buildin modems anyhow e.g. Draytek Routers

      4) Good health;


      Well our health service is quite exellent.

      5) Peace and quiet.


      No problem either.

    2. Re:Old and bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should consider moving to Germany.

      As someone who moved from the US to Germany, I feel I need to point out a few things about your claims. Don't get me wrong, I like living here, but flawless it's not.


      1) A mobile phone that works properly;

      Our mobile phones work flawlessly for at least 10 years now. 100% coverage and full interoperability between the diferent providers. And of course SMS and MMS.


      And you pay out the ass for it. Phone service here is ridiculously expensive compared to that of the US. For 30$ a month in the US you can call anyone anywhere for some huge amount of minutes (when I was there it'd by you 2000 minutes) compared to here where you get charged extra when you call someone on a different provider. Hardly anyone uses text messages there because it's so damn cheap to just call the person and have a quick conversation. This carries over into the normal market here where deutsche telekom bends you over the desk every chance they get, compared to the US where *gasp* local calls are free.


      2) Digital TV that works properly;

      I'm using digital TV for at least 5 years now. It is fully standarized and works flawlessly including an electronic program guide on all channels.


      I haven't really seen much digital tv here, perhaps because it's not very widespread, or perhaps it's so widespread that nobody notices it. Maybe I even have it because I've got the teletext electronic program guide you're talking about (which sucks btw-looks like it was written for the Atari without the fun and even worse 'playability' even though there are a lot more buttons on a remote than the original joystick). If this qualifies me as a digital cable subscriber, I can tell you that it isn't flawless. Several of my channels have varying degrees of fuzziness (snow) at varying times throughout the day.


      3) A DSL modem where the drivers have not been coded by sadists;

      You can get DSL nearly everywhere in Germany, and the drivers while not exactly works of art work quite well. I prefer hardware routers with buildin modems anyhow e.g. Draytek Routers [draytek.de]


      The original poster was complaining about the quality of DSL modems, not the availability. I agree that it's available here, but it's still expensive in my opinion (55$ for 1.5 down, but only up to 5000MB, and then you start paying by the MB), thank you Deutsche Telekom. The quality of modems shouldn't really be limited by geography, so I'll just move on to the next point.


      4) Good health;
      Well our health service is quite exellent.


      For how long? The social system here is almost to the point of no return. Granted, a large majority of the problem isn't directly related to the health care, but mostly due to unemployed people taking advantage of the system. I pay roughly 50% in taxes so people can sit around on their couch and watch TV. I support health care and wouldn't mind if that was the only place that the money was spent, but in the future the Germany economy and social system as a whole will take it on the chin. The population here is getting smaller which could result into a collapse, as the base of the pyramid gets smaller than the top.


      5) Peace and quiet.
      No problem either.


      I agree with this. If you want peace and quiet, this is the place to come. Don't even think about going shopping after after 8pm during the week, 4pm on Saturday or at all on Sunday. Everything's dead because all the stores are closed, so peace and quiet is not a problem, but not very convenient.

      I have a few other problems with this country as well, but there are a lot positive aspects too (good beer, driving as fast as you want on the autobahn-2 things not to be done together, btw). I enjoy the country on the whole and plan to stay another 2 years or so, but I just figured if the original poster was actually going to consider moving to Germany, he should get both sides.

  22. Paper by fredrikj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Light-emitting polymers aside, I think one much more interesting field of progress is paper-based dynamic displays. I recently watched a feature about this, and it seems that the technology isn't far off.

    But why paper? Because, unlike any kind of polymers that we'll know of in the near future, paper is cheap as heck. Paper also provides excellent contrast and is pleasant to read off. Not to mention the ability to draw stuff on top of it with a regular pen.

    I would personally not be surprised if paper-based computer displays rule the earth in ten years.

  23. Possible iPhone Interaction Methods by canowhoopass.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 10 years Apple (or someone else) might be ready to pioneer the holographic interface to work with this iPhone.

    Possible Output Methods

    • Earphone - Music, beeps, and speach.
    • Wrist Watch - Vibrations, lcd display, music/beeps/speech
    • Eye Glass Hookup - Display readout, images, movies, to optional ($$) digital eye glasses.
    • Holographic Display - Flies out from watch when needed. (Why Not?)

    Possible Input Methods

    • Buttons on watch Old fasioned but it works
    • Voice - Speech recognition
    • Video camera on board - It can determine light levels, and perhaps even facial recognition
    • Motion Sensor - Flick of the wrist to change modes.
    • Interactive hologram - coupling a hologram with the motion sensor, the iPhone can allow you to hit buttons out of thin air.
    • Eye wear - Coupled with the digital display, it can track your eyeballs to determine your wishes. It can also look/record forwards. If you get too close to something (like walking into a tree) it'll turn off.

    So in closing... everyone complaining about the size of the iPhone being to small to see anything on, is being short sighted.

    Rod!

    1. Re:Possible iPhone Interaction Methods by Rubyflame · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a possibility you missed: retractible touchscreens. A button on the watch could cause four 1x1 screens to extend in all directions, giving you a plus-shaped pad.

      You could fit four buttons on each section and they'd be large enough to easily press with your fingers. For a phone, you'd need 12 buttons, which would be 3 panels. That'd leave enough room for a 2x1 display, which seems pretty decent. In the mp3-player mode, you'd need maybe 8 buttons, giving you a 1x3 playlist. A PDA could give you 4 buttons, a 1x1 scribble area, and a 3x1 screen. You really could do everything like that.

      --

      All it takes is nukes and nerves.
  24. I'll show you a vision of the future by edog1203 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Smell you later" replaces "goodbye" in the English language.

  25. Apple? 2013? by shiningsun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't they be predicting that Apple will be out of business by 2013?

  26. yes, your mistake by g4dget · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When did government ever do anything better, cheaper, quicker than industry?

    All the time. For example, Medicare/Medicaid is far more efficient than just about any privately run health plan, and government research is highly efficient and has been responsible for most of the real innovations over the last 50 years.

    When it comes to big organizations and big projects, the government works very well. The real question is: what big private company has been better, cheaper, or quicker than the government? Enron? IBM? AT&T? Don't make me laugh. Big corporations are command economies but without the transparency and checks-and-balances of governments, and the often do their business free of they kind of competitive pressures that make markets efficient.

    I am all for a private sector and free markets in telecommunications. The trouble is that we don't have it. And if the choice is between unregulated inefficient corporate behemoths and public utilities or strongly regulated private utilities, the latter is much preferable and likely to be more efficient.

    1. Re:yes, your mistake by aallan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and government research is highly efficient

      Oh boy, there speaks someone who has never worked for a Government doing research.

      ...and has been responsible for most of the real innovations over the last 50 years.

      Really, you seriously think so? Want to back that up with some specific cases, I really doubt that is the case.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    2. Re:yes, your mistake by g4dget · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Oh boy, there speaks someone who has never worked for a Government doing research.

      Actually, I have. As have many graduate students.

      Really, you seriously think so? Want to back that up with some specific cases, I really doubt that is the case.

      The Internet, most basic computer science research, a large fraction of medical and drug development, most of the results in basic physics, etc. A lot of those, are, of course, in collaboration with industry, but the projects are selected and financed by the US government through institutes like (D)ARPA and NIH.

  27. where are the enabling technologies from? by g4dget · · Score: 2, Insightful
    To make something like that go, we need better battery technologies, better wireless technologies, better display technologies, and better processors. Let's see, those are being developed by a lot of small companies and some big ones like Toshiba, Ericsson, Kodak, TransMeta, Via, etc. Whether we get nifty looking designs like that write-PDA/telephone depends entirely whether those other companies manage to pull off the enabling technologies. It seems almost insulting to give the kudos to the design company that then puts them together in a nice looking but functionally fairly obvious package.

    And I don't actually foresee all those things coming about so fast anyway. Small OLED screens will hopefully be widespread in 10 years, but they'll still be expensive as wall covering. Noise cancelation of non-periodic signals is hard. And the market for mood-ring-contact-lenses seems even smaller than the market for mood rings.

  28. Moore's Law. by fluxrad · · Score: 4, Funny

    A 300 GHz computer with 64 GB of RAM that won't skip or delay even if it wanted to.


    I think Moore's law will put you around 1.5THz in 2013.

    But your system will still skip and delay because you'll be running Windows 2013.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  29. Two words... by fluxrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Playstation 9!

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  30. By the year 2013, I want by abhisarda · · Score: 2

    By 2013,
    1)not to deal with the scourge of spam as we do today. By that time, we will have better email systems. 2)An alarm clock that had a sensor(infra-red) that would check if I am out of my bed and would continue to ring until I got up even after hitting the snooze button.
    3)Really cool dual-headed displays for PDA's and other electronic devices. 4)Sale of only flat panel displays to be allowed. CRT displays should be banned.
    5)The present ratio of desktop:laptop 70:30 should be reversed. 6)AMD to have 50-60 % of the CPU marketshare

    1. Re:By the year 2013, I want by paganizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can take away my crystal clear 0% lag CRT when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

      I'm still trying to figure out why anyone would want a LCD for a desktop that's used for anything besides text.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:By the year 2013, I want by eatdave13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hear, hear!

      I can't belive my ears when I hear a salesperson pitching an LCD as a gaming display, and I can't believe my eyes when the sheep actually LOOKS at the LSD-flashback-inducing thing, nods, and shells out the $700.

      Some people would mortgage their house for razorblade underwear if someone told them it looked sexy.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
  31. My wish list for the world 2013 by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) A cure for HIV that is cheap enough to be rolled out in Africa. Failing a cure, a vaccine to stop new infection would also halt the pandemic.

    2) A method of world governance that rids us of rogue states that persecute their own populations (Saddam, North Korea et al) and also curbs rogue states with semi-democratically elected leaders who want to attack other states on dodgy pretexts (GWB I'm looking at you)

    3) An end to the tech slump, sustained growth in IT sectors, more coding jobs for me!

    4) Moore's observation to continue to hold true, more better toys getting cheaper.

    5) Following on from that, widespread internet rollouts in the third world. The street finds it's own uses for technology, and the villages will find their own uses for information and commication.

    6) Open source software to keep getting better, no more constrictive tech monopolies, and end to DVD region coding and hard crypto staying legal.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

    1. Re:My wish list for the world 2013 by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > There are already several treatments for HIV and the symptoms of AIDS that are quite cheap - that is, cheap to produce. However most (but not all [wangonet.org]) of the western pharmaceutical companies refuse to license them at discounted rates because they're such a cash cow. Which means that tens of millions are facing death simply because drugs company execs are unwilling to sacrifice their bottom lines.

      That problem will be solved by 2013. Or 2016 at the latest. It's called "patented".

      Unlike AIDS cures, we as a society have decided that some kinds of intellectual property are important We call those things "copyrighted", and you get a monopoly on that for your lifetime plus 75 years (the "75" is extended by Congress every 25 years) or until infinity minus a day - whichever comes last.

      Sink a billion dollars into developing a wonder drug, and you get 13 years to make your money back before the patents expire.

      Now if you draw a fuckin' cartoon mouse, that's another story. Some things are important, y'know?

  32. Actually . . . by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Funny

    I found this article to be horribly unrepresentative of how technology, particularly entertainment/information technology, progresses. Wherever technology goes, pornography is already there, waiting for it. Seriously, there wasn't any mention of technology in that article geared towards the production, distribution, or enjoyment of pornography, nor was there any mention of technology designed to enhance or simulate sexual experiences. Can any serious discussion of future technology exist WITHOUT mention of the pr0n industry? I think not. This article is, therefore, worthless.

  33. Hopefully the end of SMTP to reduce spam by CPgrower · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hopefully by 2013 we'll be using a new email protocol with server authentication. Didn't the author of Q-mail suggest such an implementation?

    rob

  34. Contacts? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I think sunglass contacts will NEVER catch on.

    Contacts require:

    - Prescription fitting (you definately should see an opthamologist before wearing them)
    - Careful application
    - Rewetting in dry climates
    - Cleaning/disposal

    Sunglasses will always be cheaper than sunglass-contacts because of those reasons.

  35. The Goggles by Boarder+Lord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think, the goggles with integrated display will have some future. Imagine this: A HUD-Display, connected through bluetooth to some Laptop (maybe in your backpack) could give you a huge amount of information. GPS-Navigation, E-Mail, Traffic-Warnings. Connect it to a small digicam, run a persons face through a recognition-software.Lookup the result in your databse et voila: Name, Birthdate right in front of you.

  36. Wrap-around television... by revitup.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is disturbingly similar to the "Wall Screens" in Farenheit 451. I wonder how long it will be until Microsoft starts offering their "Ultimate TV" with personalization capabilities that are made to work with digitally created talk show hosts, news anchors, etc. that call you by your name, can see you through video cameras, and change the programming depending on what your do or say in the room. It'll be interesting...

  37. The Internet by leerpm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without the defence department's initial backing, the internet would probably not exist in it's current form today.

  38. Contradiction? by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    world governance...rids us of rogue states that persecute their own populations (Saddam)... and ... curbs rogue states with semi-democratically elected leaders who want to attack other states on dodgy pretexts

    This contains everything that seems to be wrong with people's concerns about war -- please explain it if I'm misunderstanding. You seem to believe that Iraq is a rogue state, the gov't does slaughter its own population, and that it would be generally a better world should Saddam et. al. be usurped.

    But then you say that GDub's pretexts are dodgy? The people against war seem to cry that they are the unheard minority -- but keep in mind they are just that, a minority. Depeding on the poll you look at, 60% - 70% of Americans are in favor of war in Iraq. If they halted war every time there were significant numbers of protestors, Americans would probably all be speaking German right now. Or hell, speaking with British accents.

    And I *really* don't understand why it's so many Slashdotter's and other's wish that we follow a One World Order(tm). The prevalent opinion seems to be for smaller government and smaller business, but, what, unless it's the UN or some entity like it? As far as I know, the US as a sovereign nation has the right to follow its own course, even if it's contrary to that of the rest of the world.

    Frankly, I'm not saying I'm for a war -- but it's sad to me that those that are against such efforts have yet to construct an cogent argument for their cause that's more than just a personal attack on the US's incumbent Executive.

  39. A world without dopey writing. . . by Fritz+Benwalla · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Talk about the right call."
    "Let's just hope it likes your cooking."
    "Visualize world records."
    "Now that's a wrap."

    Nice to see Fozzie Bear has gotten into technology writing.

    I'd like a world where more thought is put into the content of an article than the barf-inducing cutesy closers to every squib.

    --------

    --

    Believe me, I'm as surprised by my comment as you are.
  40. More entertainment! More! More! by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're probably right, but let's try to read between the lines:

    1. The wrist computer is exactly this: a computer in your wrist. Nowadays, what is the main app for computers? Pr0n, of course. Just imagine the potential. I can't even begin with...

    2. The smell tester can be very useful when you need to check the safety of some... um... "service" you want to get.

    3. The earplug can be used to screen undesired and unerotic sounds. An invention like this is sure to experience the sex experience, even in the Slashdot demographic. But don't neutralize the sound of your parents when they come home.

    4. Nice goggles. Now you can forget those boring classes and no one will see what you're really learning about. Just keep enough interesting info in its display. It can even record your performance, for Scott's sake!

    5. Well, you have a point here. I can't imagine a way of making lenses seem more useful. Perhaps by blocking your sight when you're with an ugly woman. This is a bit chauvinistic, isn't it?

    6. Look at all those naked women! And they're in natural size! Wow!

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  41. What ever happened to by subri · · Score: 2

    What ever happened to the Refrigerator which monitored supplies and ordered groceries using the internet, and the Microwave that spoke with the Refrigerator and cooked your food for you?