Slashdot Mirror


Zaurus SL-5600/SL-5500 Comparison Whitepaper

Bill Kendrick writes "A cool as the Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 Linux-based PDA is, there are definitely some quibbles about battery life, software and syncing. Fortunately, it seems the folks at Sharp and TrollTech have been working on it for the new 5600 model. Sharp just posted a whitepaper (PDF) comparing the two models. (Newer kernel, no more root-privs-for-everything, JFFS2, dropping slow XML for PIM stuff, and USB-IO syncing, to name a few.)"

117 comments

  1. Does it come with a full version of Mozilla ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the fonts ?? It doesn't use X does it ?

    1. Re:Does it come with a full version of Mozilla ??? by mwa · · Score: 4, Informative
      How about the fonts ?? It doesn't use X does it ?

      Fonts are fine for PDA use. They don't run X (unless you add it!), they run embedded-QT. The 5500s included Opera as a browser, although I prefer konqueror-embedded.

      In fact, I prefer OpenZaurus in almost all ways. They've had jffs support for some time, and it's a simple process to mount /home on a 256M SD card. With that config, my 32M 5500D has more available RAM than a Sharp ROM configured 64M 5500.

    2. Re:Does it come with a full version of Mozilla ??? by styopa · · Score: 1

      The one major benefit for using Opera as opposed to Mozilla is Opera has been doing a lot of work on their rendering engine for small devices. The problem with Mozilla (and IE for MS devices) is that they try to render pages as if it were still a full size screen. I suggest you take a look Opera's web page about that technology, it is pretty slick.

      I still use Galeon/Mozilla at home but when I get a Zaurus I want a browser that is designed for the 320x240 screen.

      --
      Disclamer - Opinion of Person
  2. Battery comparison by giminy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gee, that's a terrific battery comparison chart. They're "comparing" both units under completely different operating conditions. At least they come right out and say it, but this gives absolutely no indication that they've fixed the 5500's weak battery life. Bummer.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Battery comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes they fixed the battery life. Including a battery that's a little over 2 times the size of the old one.

    2. Re:Battery comparison by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      speculation would be that the xscale processor supports operational modes that the strongArm processor does not (shutting down parts of the processor that are not in use, idle sleep, etc) and the fact that the two processors run at very different speeds, which affects anything else running on the processor buffers.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  3. I can't wait! by WestieDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I ordered one of the $170 dollar 5500's off of HSN. I don't care how bad it is compared to the 5600, $170 for a pda with 2 expantion slots that also happens to run linux! I can't wait too boot and get to a shell! :)

    1. Re:I can't wait! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what might be upgradable from the 5500 to 5600. Any ideas?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:I can't wait! by kotj.mf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly. Slap a CF 802.11b card in there, and surf the web on the crapper. The Information Superhighway is truly upon us.

      And if I drain the battery doing that, I've got more problems than I thought...

      --
      hang brain.
    3. Re:I can't wait! by rusty0101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just a recomendation on what cf 802.11b card to look at...

      I have used both the SMC 802.11b cf card and the Socket Low Power 802.11b cards. The Socket definately draws less power, and my experience is that it has an equal range.

      The down side of the Socket is that none of the built in wireless apps, nor any of the wireless apps (other than the text mode wireless tools) know how to communicate with the card, nor do they recognize it as a wireless network card.

      The driver for the card is on the http://www.zaurus.com/feed server as spectrum24drivers (link is untested, set up your ipkg installer to get the drivers via your usb connection, or pull them down, get them on a cf or sd card and install from there.)

      One of the local Office Depot stores is where I got my Socket card this week, There is a $30 mail in rebate, bringing the price down from 149 to 119 after the rebate.

      My experience with the SMC card was I would get about half an hour of live time with the card installed. With the Socket card I am getting much closer to 2 hours, if not 3. Considering that I only get about 4 hours of live time without any network interface, I am fairly impressed.

      If you drain the battery with this card, while sitting on the crapper, you really do have more problems than you thought.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:I can't wait! by druske · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wrote a review of three wireless cards with the Zaurus last year: Linksys, SMC, and Socket. The Socket did look to be the most promising in terms of battery life, though the range seemed a bit shorter. Of course, at the time the drivers were in pretty bad shape. The SMC was my choice at the time.

      The antenna housing on older Linksys cards is something to watch out for --- it completely blocks the stylus silo. (I had a pic up showing that, but the review site seems to have screwed up the links to the photos.) I've heard that this problem has been fixed on newer Linksys cards.

      In any case, check out the battery life comparison in that review --- you'll see that active communications (using VNC) really took the punch out of the SL-5500's batteries.

    5. Re:I can't wait! by rangerx · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Socket low power wifi card works out of the box in the new SL5600 and C700 units :)

      I am still waiting for the C700 to use the PXA255 chipset though.

    6. Re:I can't wait! by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      Anybody have any idea how much the CF 56k modems draw? Despite my comment above, I'll be trailing a 24' phone cord to the can for awhile. DSL and wireless are gonna have to wait till I'm smoke-free for three months...

      --
      hang brain.
    7. Re:I can't wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you overpaid. amazon.com has d-link cards
      for $40 after rebate.

    8. Re:I can't wait! by aka1nas · · Score: 1

      I've been using the Dlink 660w with my zaurus, works pretty well, good range, though I occasionally have to reboot the pda to reset the wireless network device when switching from different wireless networks(i.e. home and school)

    9. Re:I can't wait! by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      They are nice, I have one. Very nifty toy, although I really haven't used mine to its full potential yet. Certainly blows away most other PDA's. I routinely use the spreadsheet, text editor, calendar, and address book. The stealth kb is great! For me battery life is ok. I don't run it continously, just whip it out, type something in, and pocket it.

      BTW... these ought to make real spiffy auto mp3/ogg players with the right cabling. One of my future projects!

      --
      Clickety Click ...
  4. Memory Area by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Program Memory (Work area)

    SL-5500: 28.1MB
    SL-5600: 29.1KB

    Huh??

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:Memory Area by AlCoHoLiC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh boy, don't you know that "29.1 kb ought to be enough for everybody" ?

    2. Re:Memory Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh.. even siemens mobile phones got more mem for cheap java apps but at least its not segmented.

  5. why are there differences in s/w? by g4dget · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Shouldn't the 5600 software just install on the 5500? I mean, the 5500 has more RAM, and it's trivial to put in lots of flash. Does that mean Sharp is not going to provide an upgrade?

    1. Re:why are there differences in s/w? by twitter · · Score: 4, Informative
      Shouldn't the 5600 software just install on the 5500? I mean, the 5500 has more RAM, and it's trivial to put in lots of flash. Does that mean Sharp is not going to provide an upgrade?

      There might be differences between ARM and Xscale. I wish I knew.

      In anycase, the white paper looks like it's simply describing the difference between the software out of the box. There's a wealth of "upgrades" out there to use, even whole distros for the ambitious:

      • OpenZaurus
      • Debian Zaurus

      Ordinary software packages availiable include useful things like a terminal.

      I've seen the Open Zaurus working and it's very neat with working GUI, productivity suit and CF wifi. It is essentially a full replacement for the sotware that comes with the 5500, but you can keep and reinstall that software too.

      The Debian project looks less developed but is working on cool stuff like an X interface. They have a kernel and root system set up, and a working X. It would be fun to work on.

      Ironically, my Zaurus has a better processor than my much bigger laptop. It would be borg the two together, X to export aps to the laptop and disk storage in return. I expect to be able to do this latter than sooner.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:why are there differences in s/w? by ancukiewiczd · · Score: 1

      The XScale is an ARM; thus, logically there can't be any differences between an ARM and an XScale.

      Perhaps you meant the differences between the XScale and StrongARM. Buse the same ARM instruction set with the XScale having a few added instructions (which are usually totally useless, and thus irrelevant). Thus, they're perfectly compatible.

    3. Re:why are there differences in s/w? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not quiet true. The XScale lacks some instructions that the StronARM has and needs to emulate them. That can give you a big performance hit.

    4. Re:why are there differences in s/w? by ancukiewiczd · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. Nothing needs to be emulated; the slow performance of the XScale is due to the bad design. The XScale's memory handling is much worse than that of the StrongARM, and thus some (in practice, very few) programs can be optimized to use memory less aggressively. However, this has nothing to do with more or less instructions. The XScale does NOT emulate anything.

  6. shit by mrscorpio · · Score: 2

    The whitepaper shows that the 5500 can only record at 22khz using the mic input. Is this a device limitation, or software? Because I really want to use this when it becomes available (which will use the CF slot for input and a mic jack on the add-on itself), but it's not going to be worth it if the highest sampling rate available is 22khz :( Does anyone know anything?

    Chris

    1. Re:shit by nacs · · Score: 1

      THe mic input on the 5500 is monaural (not stereo). It is a hardware limitation of the input connector only. 22khz is enough for voice recording for which it was intended.

      This shouldn't affect you however since you'll be using the input on the CF card itself.

      --
      "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
    2. Re:shit by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Coolio, thanks.

      Chris

  7. Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anybody notice that the entire god damned front page is only stories from Taco? Did his wife kick him out of bed or what?

    1. Re:Strange by seinman · · Score: 2

      That would make sense, except that there are two Ask Slashdots posted by Cliff. One of them just a few articles down from this one.

    2. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the fact that this is how it usually is on Saturdays, I bet a lot of the crew is sleeping/taking a day off after a rather hectic series of days trying to keep things afloat during war "coverage."

    3. Re:Strange by onomatomania · · Score: 1

      That would probably be because he's wearing the Daddy Pants at the time.

    4. Re:Strange by mreategu · · Score: 1

      Well, seems that he created Slashdot...so, I guess he has the right and reason to do it...

  8. Great advantage by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    now it have 4 new themes! Finally something that I can say clearly that is better in the new model!

  9. Woo Linux by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    me want me want - really i wouldnt mind a PDA, any type that works and runs something better then WindowsCE.. :S

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
  10. Non-root privileges? by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What issue exists with running as root on a PDA? It seems like a non-issue to me.

    I mean it's a PDA: personal digital assistant. It's not like it's a multi-user workstation or an network server. Why wouldn't I just run as root?

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Non-root privileges? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Why wouldn't I just run as root?

      Why would you ?

      Seriously though, if you're logged in as root, you can do an end-run around lots of the mechanisms that make Linux as stable as it is. If you're a nonprivileged user, AND provided the kernel is doing it's job properly, it shouldn't be possible to make the thing crash.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Non-root privileges? by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are several servers available for the Z, including but not limited to ftp, apache, and samba. With both ftp and samba, since you are effectively root, there is noting preventing joe random hacker from downloading, editing and uploading your /etc/ files and making the device do lots of things you would otherwise not be planning on.

      Who needs a root-kit if the device does everything as root?

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Non-root privileges? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its a PDA. It just needs to do very simple tasks. If you are asking it to do more, you really should get a serious computer/laptop.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Non-root privileges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I regard my Zaurus as more of a "real computer" than a PDA. Its CPU, while lacking hardware floating point, is still nearly 50 times faster than the first computer I could do really useful stuff on (an Amiga). It has 64 times the RAM of an Amiga, and I've got a compact flash card that is bigger than the first hard drive I had.

      I can run Common Lisp programs on it, for pity's sake! Can you imagine going back in time to the 80s and handing an MIT professor a Zaurus, explaining that it's a 200 MHz machine with 64MByte of RAM, running a unix-compatible environment? He'd come in his pants.

      You youngsters don't realise just how much you can do with a 1MHz microprocessor and 64KByte of RAM, let alone 200MHz and 64MByte...

  11. Linux syncing by ciryon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What ever happened to the KDE sync program that would sync QPE/Opie based Linux handhelds?

    One thing I'd like to see is some company selling OS upgrades that lets people throw away Microsoft Pocket PC/Windows CE and replace with Linux. But then there must be a good syncing solution for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

    Ciryon

    1. Re:Linux syncing by mtnharo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It does exist. It is called KitchenSync. Currently, it is part of the CVS tree for kdepim, and is scheduled to appear in KDE 3.2 You can have a look at the latest available tarball here. It works well enough. Currently it syncs to Agenda V3 or Qtopia/Opie based handhelds, and supports syncing addressbook, todolist and calendar to KAddressbook and KOrganizer. Works as expected, but it is still pretty much alpha quality. With enough time, this program should be able to sync just about anything to your desktop. A big thank you to the KDE and Handhelds.org people working on this.

  12. The C700 is much nicer by mocm · · Score: 5, Informative

    with its 640x480 super crisp display and its morphing ability. I hope they will sell it outside of Japan. Sharp had a lot of them at CeBIT, not a single SL-5600. They know it's much nicer.
    Here are some links:
    My Zaurus Info page
    Conics Shop for ordering outside of Japan
    Sharp's Japanese Zaurus Page

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:The C700 is much nicer by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a place that will sell you an English C700 for $700.

      http://www.dynamism.com/zaurus/index.shtml

      Purchasing information:
      The Sharp Zaurus SL-C700 ships direct to you from Japan, arriving in about 3 business days. We do accept returns within 5 days, and subject to a 15% restocking fee. (Returned units will be sold at a discount on our specials page.) For the latest delivery info, please call a sales representative at 800-711-6277. Please see our pricing page for ordering information.

      The MAJOR drawback to the C700 is crappy battery life, only about 4 hours. Thats not much better than most laptops.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:The C700 is much nicer by Guylhem · · Score: 5, Informative
      The battery life is not a problem - you can fit in a 5600 battery after doing some shaving ;-) Just go to the Zaurus C700 hardware forum.

      Regarding the low memory, some of us are trying to upgrade it to 64M. The problem is not hardware now (read - hardware hackersl could replace the 32M of RAM by a 64M chip) but software. We are trying to make the XScale recognize that much RAM. It may involve kernel and bootloader hacking since the easy solutions like mem=64 did not work. Any help is welcome.

      And for those who may say the CPU is too slow, I personally did overclock mine to ~450 Mhz, and the RAM to ~150Mhz.No problem of any kind. I did also enable the Cache (disabled by default by Sharp for a risk of bug on some hardware revisions) so I can now play divx full screen at 20 fps without any problem. It is certainly better than carrying a huge laptop in the plane!

      I just need the bigger 5600 (b500) battery a friend is bringing back from Japan and I'll be most happy with my Zaurus C700 PDA ;-)

      PS: if you want to get one, check the C700 FAQ. We are filling it with tips from the forum.

    3. Re:The C700 is much nicer by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      You might find it a good thing to contact some of the developers at the OpenZaurus project - they have experience compiling custom Kernels for the Z, which involves setting it for the 32mb SL-5000D and 64mb SL-5500.

    4. Re:The C700 is much nicer by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
      with its 640x480 super crisp display and its morphing ability. I hope they will sell it outside of Japan. Sharp had a lot of them at CeBIT, not a single SL-5600. They know it's much nicer.

      Then which is the eMail address or "petition page" (anyone on broadband -who's not a spammer- set up this one?) to convince Sharp that there's a market for the C700 (or even an improved version in this form factor, e.g. with more memory and wireless "connectivity") in Europe and the U.S. as well?

      Sharp must have noticed there's been considerable interest at CeBIT, but (unless they are in short supply for their displays or something) they probably just don't realize yet how many people are yearning to get this type of device, even more so as the competition seems to fade with no new products in Psion's pipeline.

    5. Re:The C700 is much nicer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly is but it will never be sold in the US because our idiotic press has a fetish for keyboards to be of 100% size. It's what killed off the Psion, the HP 200LX and the entire class of WinCE handheld pcs.

      I find this rather ironic given the fact that it's the same idiots who are now praising the pathetic keyboards of the Clies and Blackberries. Back in 1997 I could do everything except play video on my HP LX which is now "cutting-edge" tech on the toy-factor (non-clamshell) computers: make telephone calls, manage phone address books, receive and send text messages, use the net and much more.

      Palm and Microsoft have destroyed the handheld market. Things were much better and developing much quicker before they entered it. I long for the days of Newton and 200LX

    6. Re:The C700 is much nicer by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know those products were on the market and still would be except that Americans weren't buying them. I wish they still were. I'm sort of considering buying a Jornada 720 to run Linux. I did just buy a Zaurus. I can actually type fairly quickly on it's keyboard, although obviously not the 80wpm I can type on a normal keyboard. It's also kind of a pain to type anything other than letters.

      The thing is, most Americans aren't interested in sub-notebooks and palmtop computers. They want electronic datebooks, so that's what Palm and MS give them. When Americans buy computers, they want BIG BEEFY AMERICAN COMPUTERS WITH HUGE AMOUNTS OF STORAGE AND THE FASTEST CPUs. Sounds a lot like the American automobile market vs. the Japanese.

      Me, I wish I'd bought a Jornada 720 or something similar when I started college, so I could write code in class. Frankly I hate handwriting recognition. My handwriting sucks. And the screens on pocket pc's is just too small and narrow for real text editing. The 640x240 screens on the original win CE machines was much better, IMO. Of course if manufacturers would just turn their pocket PCs 90 degrees... I think that would be a much better form factor. I'd rather be able to read a line of text without wrapping, and scroll a little more often.

      PDAs are still cutting edge. I think we'll be seing a lot of changes in the coming years.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
  13. SL5000 by rf0 · · Score: 1

    I bought one of the first Zaurus in the shape of the the SL5000 and wondered if anyone has any figures for the battery life on it? I do find the a WLAN CF/SD Card and backlight I will get 90 minutes if I'm lucky. If worse comes to worse I just plug it into the mains :)

    Rus

  14. where the demand IS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone wonder why there isn't on the market parts to make their own handhelds? This is part of the reason why embedded devices haven't taken off like pc's have. I'd like to see a parts market in handhelds, like you have one for pc's. If standardized parts were made available and a full fledged embedded linux distribution available, the market would really take off. I'd like to see at the very minimum, a "kit", is anyone here old enough to remember the old heath kits?; they were really cool!

  15. Make way for the new Zaurus by jalfreize · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing they've done differently is the memory.
    Its flash+RAM based, instead of being ROM+RAM-based.
    That should effectively provide more space (if they write all persistent data to flash when the unit is shut down), and better battery utilisation.
    This is a cool device, and a couple of my friends have the original 5500. One of them, who does testing for EMC, used to mount his test volumes over NFS, and start off his test scripts over telnet, all over the 802.11, while he sat in boring meetings.
    Not as much software out there, compared to the palmOS platform, though.

    1. Re:Make way for the new Zaurus by pacc · · Score: 1

      Flash+RAM if what they mean is a move to permanent storage and applications executions space seems like a move towards a more PC-like setup.

      Without better support for XIP (execute in place) Linux have seemed to fit less well on portables needing more memory than necessary.

      Now with support of applications executed from CF cards and the like (and maybe a Swap partition) wouldn't this make us run in circles around standard PDA's.

      Of course this doesn't mean that this is the best way to do things on a PDA. Is the Sharp solution backing away from what's really suitable for a handheld or has the new approach been made possible by getting closer to XIP?

  16. Battery Life by druske · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do you suppose they didn't compare battery life under similar conditions? Most of the specs for the 5600 look great, and the battery life on its own doesn't look bad either, but this paper gives no basis for comparing the battery life of the 5500 and the 5600.

  17. 5500 firmware upgrade? by caraiman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When is Sharp going to provide a firmware upgrade for the 5500? The latest firmware still has bugs. Here are a couple of examples:
    • Although you can configure multiple SMTP accounts, the mail client only uses the one configured first
    • Every now and then the soft eject for a CF card doesn't work and you have to physically take it out
    In addition, since Sharp has already worked on a new kernel, PIM, etc., it would be great if existing 5500 owners could benefit from what their software group has done since the latest firmware upgrade came out.
    The hardware changes on the 5600 are not a radical shift from the 5500 (unless, of course, you buy into the MHz hype). I bet that not many people will ditch their 5500s and invest in 5600s primarily to fix problems that could be resolved through a firmware upgrade.
    1. Re:5500 firmware upgrade? by dybvandal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they are actually quite radical .. for example the mmc/sd chip is now integrated btw: the opensource community is trying to get 2.4.19 to run on the 5500 but the old mmc/sd module needs an update ... which is impossible because the community does not have a license from sd.org and sharp doesn't have the "resources" to take care of it for us nor is it offering any assistance in getting one of the community the rights to do it himself .. this is where i am pissed

  18. depends on what you mean by crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's pretty easy to make a UNIX so unusable that it might as well have crashed.
    perl -e "while (1) { fork() }"
    is the classic. Filling /tmp or / to the brim works well too. Many many UNIXs will crash in this case. In most others, you'll just have many of the processes and daemons die due to lack of error handling for
    malloc()
    or file creation calls.
    1. Re:depends on what you mean by crash by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      Everything you mentioned can be managed by ulimits, with the exception of filling up filesystems. I don't know about jffs2, which is what I believe the Zaurus uses, but the 'traditional' filesystems used by Linux (ext2/3) provide for a certain percentage of each volume to be reserved for root only; once again, running as non-root saves the day.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  19. Most improvements seem to be in the software by vlad_petric · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... then I'm wondering why are they not releasing an updated ROM for the 5500 as well?

    As a (relatively proud) owner of the 5500, I can tell you for sure that there's a lot of room for improvements.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Most improvements seem to be in the software by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

      Patience. There are some minor hardware differences, they have promised a port ASAP.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  20. Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    A question... Does anyone know what web browser it uses? Certainly would be nice to know if there's an Open Source browser out there with decent performance and stability.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Browser? by ouzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 5500 came (comes) packaged with a version of Opera. You can also install an embedded version of Konqueror. See here for more software than you'll know what to do with :-)

    2. Re:Browser? by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand, the SL-5600 uses Opera6 as the default browser.

      I have a SL-5500 which comes with Opera 5 as it's default browser.

      Downloadable browsers include Konquer and Links-ssl.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Well I would imagine that Konq would be quite slow, even on the 400MHz model (my Psion is 35MHz and that's more than I need :-) )... BTW, that goes for Konq-embedded as well.

      As for Opera, I admit I didn't try 6, but as of 5 it wasn't very stable for very long. Do you have any problems with it crashing, or perhaps do you not use the browser enough on the handheld that you would have a problem. I guess it's a moot point anyhow... I strongly dislike Opera's preferences, bookmarks, tab system, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Browser? by ouzel · · Score: 1

      I sold my SL-5500 a few months ago and honestly can't remember how quickly Konq and Opera loaded. But I know I'd remember if it were really slow because it would have annoyed the heck out of me. :-)

      The Zaurus is an amazing machine but I found that I spent most of my time giving it care and feeding, instead of using it to be more productive. It was also my first PDA. After a while I realized I'd be a lot happier (and more productive) just using a laptop, which is what I did.

      Speaking of productivity, you arcade fans will be happy to discover that MAME has been ported to the Zaurus. Works great!

    5. Re:Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I found that I spent most of my time giving it care and feeding, instead of using it to be more productive. It was also my first PDA.

      This seems to be a universal problem. My first was a Windows CE device. I wised up and got a Psion, which happens to be pretty much the only handheld that you can be productive with. WinCE devices are just useless tech toys, and Palms are glorified alarm clocks. I'm not sure where Linux handhelds fit in, but I'd bet it's in the same area as WinCE.

      BTW, MAME has been working on my Psion for several years now :-)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Browser? by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      I would give dillo a shot. I just built it on my desktop and with -O3 it's memory footprint is only 6 megs. Yeah Opera is probably less. It may have some other features to reduce it's memory usage. I know people are using it on Ipaq's running Linux.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    7. Re:Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I just built it on my desktop and with -O3 it's memory footprint is only 6 megs.

      Hmm, maybe you didn't strip the executable? It's still in early devel so install doesn't strip automatically...

      In case you haven't yet guessed, I've used Dillo a great deal. However, until it has the ability to copy text from a webpage, and save an image within a webpage, I don't have the slightest interest in using it. It's just too much of a hassle to switch to a different browser when I need those features, which is very often.

      In addition, Dillo is still unstable and crashes after some time. Because it's GPL'd, the SSL patch floating around can't be integrated, so it goes unmaintained for the most part. The bookmark system is too limited at this point (no folders, edit the text file to delete). After those issues are cleared up, I just might start using it.

      There are other features I'd wish to have as well, but aren't completely required... I disable javascript on my browsers, but sometimes you do need it. Tabs are a very nice feature if implimented well (unlike Opera). A preferences dialog would be an improvement. And additionally, I would be much happier contributing if it wasn't under the GPL.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Browser? by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      Well, #1 the Zaurus is a glorified alarm clock as well. That is really one of the best PDA features. You punch all your meetings in and the sucker beeps and buzzes when its time to go. This is handier than you would believe.

      Secondly, you stick it in your pocket and go to the meeting without grabbing a pad and pencil since you have the stealth kb to make quick notes and such.

      As far as doing awesome Linux programming on a Zaurus, .. uh ... well whats the point? Load it up with games, and just use it. Its a handy little gadget. Take it to the doctor's and play backgammon or spades in the waiting room, etc. Punch in your shopping list and take it to Wally Mart if you want to be a show-off. Load it up with multimedia on a SD card and its a mini entertainment system.

      The Opera Browser, BTW is OK, but I never surf live with mine ( no 802.11 ). It has problems with a 1Mb text file, very very sluggish.

      Overall though, well worth it. I paid $325 for mine and it still serves me well. I will never buy another laptop since these gizmos do 90% of the job and are much more portable.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
    9. Re:Browser? by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      Hehe... I am probably the first person that ever ran Dillo on Debian/Hurd. I hacked the shit out of Gnu Portable Threads and got it to compile under Hurd about a year ago. This gave me pthread emulation. I compiled Dillo as my test app. It kind of worked but was not really usable. An aside, I submitted my Pth Hurd patch and it was incorporated upstream! :-)

      Dunno if Dillo can be compiled with QPE. It would probably work great with Debian/Zaurus though. I would be running Debian on it now ( I'm a Debian old-timer ), except QToptia works fine and for a PDA, its pretty spiff. I still use this gadget at work a lot and need QPE so I can do stupid crap like beam files via the IR port to my boss's Sony Clie' and sync with MS Outlook, etc.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
    10. Re:Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      #1 the Zaurus is a glorified alarm clock as well. That is really one of the best PDA features.

      I probably didn't explain myself very well. The reason I call Palms glorified alarm clocks, is because that is all they are suited to do very well. WinCE devices are toys because they are slow (despite incredibly fast processors, they are smoke by my 35MHz Psion for everything but pure number-crunching like OGG/MP3 and DivX), and they have all the features you could want, but each and every one is sub-par. eg. Sure, you CAN take notes on a WinCE device, but it's an incredible pain. Sure you CAN use it as an alarm, but it's a terrible interface and the filesystem tends to corrupt itself after a week of use. etc.

      you have the stealth kb to make quick notes and such.

      Yes, well with my Psion, I have a full keyboard that I can touch-type with. The Zaurus may be faster than input on a Palm, but a Psion will still smoke it.

      I will never buy another laptop since these gizmos do 90% of the job and are much more portable.

      Wow! You must not have used your laptop for very much!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Browser? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      One thing I meant to say is that WinCE devices freeze up ALL THE TIME. Play an ogg file or two and just try to open another app after that... Run 3 apps at the same time for a few minutes and it's time to find the hole for the reset button yet again. The entire time I used my WinCE device heavily (3-4 months), I had to do a manual reset daily, and reload all the apps and data just about every week.

      Then there is always the horrible battery life, the inability to see the screen in sunlight, the bulky design that is difficult to hold, and the whole idea of holding a handheld with one hand vertically is sure to start hurting anyone's wrists after a half hour of note-taking. Et cetera.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. CPU is discontinued? by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the whitepaper the 5600 uses Intel's PXA250 XScale chip, which this article seems to imply may well be discontinued already!! Hopefully the new PXA255 is a drop-in replacement. In that case the new 5600s will be even faster since the 255 uses a faster memory bus. If it's not a drop-in expect a delay while Sharp figures out what the heck to do!

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

    1. Re:CPU is discontinued? by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it says:
      Intel is going to stop producing the PXA250 soon, if it hasn't already. Handheld makers must switch to the new chips by March 28. The new chips will cost the same as the current ones.

      Which means Sharp won't be making handhelds with the PXA250 pretty soon.

    2. Re:CPU is discontinued? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      No one likes the new 400MHz XScale--it is just too different from a standard ARM to be really useful to arm programmers, hard to optimize properly--it's good for a first attempt, but they already have another in the works that sacrfices a few nifty things and brings the performance up to what it should be at fewer MHz.

  22. OpenZaurus is better by Tepar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I dropped Sharp's OS a couple of months ago in favor of OpenZaurus, and found nothing but improvements. (Almost) every complaint I had about the original software was addressed:

    1. The calendar app is much more stable. My one remaining issue is with repeating appointments: if you modify a repeating appointment on the Z, it'll duplicate itself and you'll have two appointments in the same spot: one with the old info, and one with the new. If you instead modify the appt. with the Qtopia Desktop software (Linux--I never use the Windows version), you don't have this problem.

    2. I used to lose all my to-dos everytime I synced with the Sharp software. Fixed.

    3. You can get ipks from the Zaurus Software Index (http://www.killefiz.de/zaurus) to preserve the Jeode environment as well as the Hancom apps and Opera, so you can still use them on OpenZaurus. These utilities will convert them to ipks which you can copy to your machine. When you install OpenZaurus, you can just reinstall these apps as normal. I can testify that the Jeode one works: I don't have a need for the Hancom apps or Opera, so I never reinstalled them.

    4. The theme feature is there in OpenZaurus, so if you're using it, you've already got what Sharp gives you in the 5600. I'm using the Liquid theme.

    5. There's a nice Today app in OpenZaurus that gives you a snapshot of your day--both to-dos and calendar appointments.

    6. I haven't encountered a 3rd party ipk that I used to use in Sharp's rom that doesn't work with the OZ rom.

    7. I had to upgrade Sharp's rom to use a 128MB SD card. This also broke my connection to the Linux version (some "security patch" was also included in this upgrade that prevented the Linux Qtopia desktop from connecting, and also disabled ftp). Installing OZ fixed all of these issues.

    8. OZ includes OpenSSH by default, so it's much easier to get into the Z and copy files.

    9. The Sharp ROM crashed all the time. And I mean ALL THE TIME. I don't have that problem with OZ.

    To get to the point, I would recommend to anyone who runs Linux and is purchasing a 5500 right now to save yourself the headaches and replace the default ROM with OpenZaurus. If you back up Jeode, Hancom, and Opera, you won't lose anything by doing it, and you'll have a much more stable PDA.

    1. Re:OpenZaurus is better by krow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I found that Open Zaurus:
      1) Crashed more often
      2) Email application was more primitive
      3) The backup didn't work at all
      4) The application to install packages looked nicer but screwed up for more often.

      I went back to using the normal ROM's for this reason.

      Maybe someday...

      --
      You can't grep a dead tree.
    2. Re:OpenZaurus is better by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Jeode -- the damn thing (evm, that is) is almost perfect for XWT -- The only class I've found that doesn't exist with evm's AWT implementation is BufferedImage. So close...

    3. Re:OpenZaurus is better by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      Hmm... might have to give it a try. I don't have much trouble with the Sharp ROM, but if you shell to BASH and start mucking about there is a high likelyhood that you will fsck it up. I found mine became unstable if I installed telnetd.

      Will scope it out.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
  23. I only wish by floydman · · Score: 1

    if they could add a GSM module to the damn thing, now that would make it sell like fire

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  24. ls -R / by snitty · · Score: 1

    I can't tell you all how useful it was to see the entire listing of files on the SL-5600, in fact, I think that should come in all white papers.

    --
    Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    1. Re:ls -R / by bstadil · · Score: 1

      It is not quite as dumb as you indicate. The screen is quite small and having it as a non nested printable reference is handy. Second on the mailing list you will note quite a few references to how the file structure is laid out. Its handy to point to a document on the web while you do this.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  25. Application Support by jaaron · · Score: 3, Informative

    What I find interesting is that they've dropped the XML format for their PIM applications. Now they're using something called DTM:

    DTM (DaTa Manager) is a set of modules that provide database functions to the applications. ... However, all the default PIM applications on the SL-5600 now adopt and are managed by the DTM (PIM database). Thus, and 3rd party PIM applications that access the XML files on the SL-5500 PIM applications will not run as expeected. ...

    This does not spell out well for third party developers who now have to have compliant apps for the 5500 and the 5600. It sounds like they're using something like the pdb format for palm. If they're going to change, I wonder why they didn't go with a standard like iCalendar (RFC2445) at least for the PIM apps.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  26. Product info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be cool, but be aware that it contains "Embedix" technology, a product of our pals at SCO/Caldera/Lineo (or whatever the name is this week). If people are serious about showing there displeasure with SCO, consider that before making a purchase.

  27. Using a newer kernel; SD card support? by iabervon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So far as I know, the only driver for SD cards is closed-source and only available for 2.4.8; does anyone know if the 5600 supports them, or just the MMC version?

    1. Re:Using a newer kernel; SD card support? by shimpei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The answer is yes, assuming that the 5600 is indeed identical to the B500 sold in Japan. The driver is still closed-source AFAIK.

  28. the 5500 gives up 3-8 hours of battery life. by q2a · · Score: 2, Informative

    Geez guys, learn how to use your pda already.
    Zaurus battery life is based on TYPE OF USE people!
    I only have to charge once or twice a week.
    And yes, theKompany and OpenZaurus kicks palm booty.
  29. explanation by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    The 5500 has 64mb of ram while the 5600 has 32mb of ram. By using an alternative distro such as OpenZaurus you can use all of that ram. The sharp rom makes a ramdisk for program storage.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  30. Mine's been... by 0x7F · · Score: 2, Funny
    sitting unused in the docking cradle for a while now. Let's check up on it.
    tpope@marge:~% ssh snowball
    Linux snowball 2.4.6-rmk1-np2-embedix #11 Tue Oct 29 14:43:28 CST 2002 armv4l unknown
    root@snowball:~# uptime
    10:34pm up 70 days, 17:23, load average: 4.00, 4.00, 4.00
    root@snowball:~#
    Wow. Let's see a PocketPC do that!
    1. Re:Mine's been... by fzammett · · Score: 1

      Sitting unusued in a docking craddle?

      A PocketPC wouldn't crash either. Trying to take a pot sot without anything to back it up?

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    2. Re:Mine's been... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The thing is, PDAs, phones, MP3 players and various other handheld thingies should never ever crash. My fridge doesn't crash, my camera doesn't crash and I don't expect these things to either. They are consumer gadgets not full blown computers with lots of drivers and bits that fail.


      My Palm Pilot Vx has had an uptime that must measure in years now. And that's with day to day use. The only time I had to reboot it was when I updated it to PalmOS 4.


      I would be most upset if I 'upgraded' to a Windows CE or Linux PDA and discovered the thing died for no apparant reason whenever it felt like it. Even once a month would be unacceptable. If this is a common thing in CE or the Zaurus (I don't know), then it is absolutely shocking that people put up with it.

    3. Re:Mine's been... by 0x7F · · Score: 1
      The thing is, PDAs, phones, MP3 players and various other handheld thingies should never ever crash.


      Neither should workstations and notebooks, but they certainly do.

      Anyways, my primary point was how cool it was to be able to ssh into a PDA. I threw in the uptime as an extra (possibly undeserved) zing against Microsoft.
  31. The Handheld PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Americans didn't buy them because they were too big and cost too much. Remember that in the beginning of Windows CE, all of the units were keyboard-based and there were many of them from a variety of manufacturers: HP, Compaq, Sharp, Casio... However, these 1.0 units were a complete joke as they had pathetic battery life and the most useless operating system to ever be released to the mainstream market. They were also overpriced but were pretty small like the Philips Velo which actually became somewhat popular.

    But CE 2.0 came and then everyone decided to follow the lead of HP and make these ridiculously large units which couldn't even honestly be called palmtops. The prices were raised even further.

    CE 2.1 came and was actually fairly useable except for the fact that you couldn't store any of your PIM databases on a flash card (a cause of much frustration on my part). By this time, however, most of the manufacturers had pulled out of the market leaving only NEC and HP. The units were a bit smaller but still were too big and the cost was as much as a much more useful laptop.

    The other problem was bad marketing. Microsoft knew the early CE devices were crap and so it didn't promote them very much.

    The handheld PC, IMHO, is the perfect platform for Linux since the units cost a lot to manufacture. However, with a free OS and apps, units like these could be made for about USD 500. They'd have to be about as big as an HP 200LX which is about 6 inches wide by 4 inches and weighs about 12 ounces.

    --Antiphon

  32. Battery Life by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Batteries should be standardised? Or something agreed upon thier use. The thing is that all it takes is one company to patent a method and then no one wants to use it.

    Or something because if we could buy our batteries from a seporate supplier we might buy the original product.

    Where as at the moment companies integrate everything into one highly controllable product. While this gives them power over the final experience that the product gives it ultimately leads to a bad results.

    An example of companies not working together. Old news, but always relevent. Companies who don't cooperate will be competing and that means one will die. Evolution.

  33. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Stephen+King · · Score: 0

    Hmm, lemme check... Nope, I'm still not dead.

    --
    Karma: Undead.
  34. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1
  35. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    None of our men are "experts." We have most unfortunately found it necessary
    to get rid of a man as soon as he thinks himself an expert -- because no one
    ever considers himself expert if he really knows his job. A man who knows a
    job sees so much more to be done than he has done, that he is always pressing
    forward and never gives up an instant of thought to how good and how efficient
    he is. Thinking always ahead, thinking always of trying to do more, brings a
    state of mind in which nothing is impossible. The moment one gets into the
    "expert" state of mind a great number of things become impossible.
    -- From Henry Ford Sr., "My Life and Work"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...