Slashdot Mirror


Anything Box Releases An Album To Share

cats writes "Anything Box, the synthpop band from the 80's who had a hit with 'Living in Oblivion' have released an introspective albumn in mp3 format under a 'freeware' style license. Anyone who has ever seen these guys perform know they are just a bunch of nice people trying to make ends meet as musicians. I had the opportunity to hang with Claude before his show in NJ at The Pipe back in 1998. He had some interesting asides about how the music business in general operates. They manipulate the artists' work as well as take huge cuts of musicians' profits. The album is available via download as one big zip file including artwork and is in mp3 format. Very cool."

163 comments

  1. OK by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now does that make them a one download wonder?

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    1. Re:OK by locarecords.com · · Score: 1

      We at LOCA Records have been experimenting with Free Licence releases since last year. But we actually release the records, so example our ML release is a 12"vinyl release that includes a copy of the Open Audio license (from EFF.org) as part of the record artwork...

      The record is getting very good reviews but bizarrely no reviewer has so far picked up on the open license that we are using. It just seems to be passing everyone by.. this is very strange as you would expect *someone* to notice...

      --
      ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
  2. Wow by Cyno01 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    *stands up and claps*

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And i applaud. the album d/l,s at 20+kb,s
      Thx guys for the d/l.

  3. I would love to hear this group by Rooked_One · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but anonymous login to download the file is denied. Anyone know if this is just temp to deal with the /. effect?

    1. Re:I would love to hear this group by Jrod5000+at+RPI · · Score: 1

      anon works just fine for me... unfortunately its gonna take over a half hour to download the album.
      i'm dying to hear what their music sounds like.

    2. Re:I would love to hear this group by milkmandan9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Manually FTPing in reveals that there is a 10-user limit to the server.

      What are the odds you or I will be one of them?

      That's what I thought. I'll be back in a few days.

    3. Re:I would love to hear this group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slashdotting of something like this is exactly the type of thing that BitTorrent would be perfect for. Anyone with a tracker care to start it up?

    4. Re:I would love to hear this group by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you could just use one of the P2P networks to get ahold of it?

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    5. Re:I would love to hear this group by oz_ko · · Score: 1

      I'm one ;) I expect another 9 relpies soon...

    6. Re:I would love to hear this group by slugo3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      from the site

      "C+P Presswerk.13 Media. All Rights Reserved. These titles may not be mass manufactured, resold, or otherwise distributed in stores without the permission of Presswerk.13 Media. They are to remain FREE as the artist intended. If you bought this album, please report it to us!

      why not?
      sounds like they dont care if you redistribute it, you just cant sell it.

  4. Slashdot by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A band from the 80's, just trying to make ends-meat, and you link them to slashdot. Hopefully the publicity will skyrocket whatever profits they can make, instead of just incuring heavy ISP costs.... looked like an independent site.

    --

    --
    "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    1. Re:Slashdot by slugo3 · · Score: 1

      like they say "any publicity is good publicity". I'm sure that any commercial site that gets linked on slashdot is happy to get all the hits. after all why do you set up a public webpage other than to have people visit it and why did this band do this? small personal sites probably don't like a /.ing as much.
      This story reminds me of The Offspring. I'm pretty sure they released an album a few years ago and prereleased it on their website in mp3. they were convinced that the trading of their music on P2P networks actually help their album sales.
      Currently they have an album where the cd looks like a generic CDR with marker writing that says the title of the album "steal this album". :)

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that's system of a down.

      tard.

    3. Re:Slashdot by slugo3 · · Score: 1

      Look here

      why is your sig "tard"? are you special?

    4. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, more like system of a down syndrome

    5. Re:Slashdot by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      One big diff.. the offspring are already a big band, maybe not the richest in the world, but I'm sure the band members combind can easily spare $2k for what they believe in.

      I doubt this band can stand for much if it requires a lot of money.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    6. Re:Slashdot by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      um, dude, I think you have your facts a little mixed up here. First off, they were only able to release the first single for free in MP3 format. They wanted to release the entire album for free in MP3 format on their site, but Sony (their label) had a fit, as this was unheard of at the time. The free single ended up being the compromise, which we doesn't seem all that spectacular now, but they were among the first 2 or 3 major label bands to do it.

      And as far as the "Steal This Album" thing goes, that's not the Offspring. That's a System of a Down album.

    7. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "just trying to make ends-meat"

      The last recourse of a starving artist?

  5. why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by jbellis · · Score: 2, Funny

    You get what, an extra 1% compression? Sheesh.

    1. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by arose · · Score: 1

      So you don't have to download each file manualy.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by jbellis · · Score: 1

      that's even sillier, though... I'd rather try one song first before going for a 30MB d/l, even with broadband.

    3. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by aheath · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sometimes it's easy forget that there is more to ZIP utilities than file compression.

      It makes sense to zip multiple uncompressible files in order to package related files. This simplifies the download process for someone who wants to receive all the .MP3 files and artwork files in a single download. This practice goes back to the early CP/M BBS days and such utilities as LU the "Library Utility."

      ZIP utilities can also be used to control the presentation of a download. In a previous job, I packaged software updates for download. I often created self-extracting archives with an explicit recommended decompression path. This made life a lot easier for the person downloading the file. This also made it easier support person who had to walk someone through a software upgrade.

    4. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by arose · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also download individual songs.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1, Troll

      I often created self-extracting archives with an explicit recommended decompression path.

      That's great for closed source software, but for something platform independant like MP3s, it's exceedingly stupid.

      Tar is available on every modern computing platform, and doesn't waste time trying to compress uncompressible files.

      Sometimes it's easy to forget there's more to packaging utilities than ZIP.

    6. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by arose · · Score: 1

      I agree, but tar is far better for that kind of thing than zip.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    7. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Zip has an index at the end of the file, so to extract anything one has to get the whole file first. This is good as a foolproofing measure to prevent people from extracting half-downloaded files over existing installations of some sotware and getting an unusable setup, but it's absolutely pointless for anything else.

      OTOH, tar (gzipped or not) has no index, and files can be extracted as they are being downloaded.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    8. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to be a good thing? If your download dies with a tar, at least you have the first few mp3s and part of another one, whereas with a zip, you would have to download it again.

    9. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Habit maybe, because at one time zipping mp3s was necessary, or at least stopped a lot of inconvenience.

      For a long time, the default mime.types in web servers did not have the .mp3 extension. They were served as the server default, normally text/plain. This was bad, because if it was text/plain the client would then try to translate line endings, gorking the file... (errr "cooking" was the actual parlance). There was a utility called Uncook.exe that was popular for a while. It would try to undo this translation, looking for every CR-LF pair, assuming it came from this "cooking" and return it to a LF. Youcould getthe music, but a P.I.T.A. Eventually, people realized that .zips were pretty much always handled right (application/anything is never linefeed translated) and was a convenient file type for Windows users. Sometimes the files were actually zipped, sometimes they were just renamed to fool the web server into serving it as application/something.

    10. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by spike2131 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In terms of being more appropriate technology, yes, tar is better for the purpose than zip. In terms of being something that the average luser will be able to figure out how to use, zip is by far the better choice.

      Zip is easy, people recognize zip. People use WinZip. Windows XP's treatment of zip files is so similar to treatment of directories, a lot of people might not even notice the difference.

      Tar is confusing; people aren't used to it. Non-techies don't know what it is, much less what circumstances it is a more appropriate technology for the purpose than zip. People don't have, or don't know they have, software that can handle tar.

      The word "Zip" reminds people of bringing things together, of speed and efficiency. Of zip disks. The word "Tar" reminds people of black, sticky goo.

      Ultimately, tar (and .gz, .bz2, etc) is for geeks, and .zip is for everyone else who doesn't want to hassle with having to know about a bunch of differnt file formats.

      It would be nice if more users were educated as to why tar is a better option, but they are not. Anythingbox is just trying to distribute their music; they could use .tar to make it a teaching moment, or they could use .zip, which everybody understands, and appeals to the widest possible audience.

      So for this application - precious seconds of compression time be dammed - zip is better.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    11. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      -Or because some corporate Nazi-IT types block the ability to download mp3's.

      -Or some users have inadvertantly got thier browser configured to open the file rather than download it.

      Just a couple of alternatives for you to ponder.

    12. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by droopus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other than a convenient way to gather multiple tracks together, to prevent these guys from doing this kind of stuff.

      Yep, little old Winzip is the Sharpie for this expensive DRM.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    13. Re:why do people even bother zipping mp3s? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      -Or some users have inadvertantly got thier browser configured to open the file rather than download it.

      Most users, even. I had a collection of mp3s up on my website for awhile, and I had to take them down because I discovered most people don't bother to download them, they treat your site like a part of their media library and just stream them over... and over... and over. It was kind of lame.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  6. This is what we've been looking for people by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not my kind of music, but if you like it...this is they way we've been hoping thigs would start to go. If there's anyplace on their site where you can donate a couple bucks to help support the band, it would be a good idea.

    We DO want to encourage this kind of thing, and the only way to do that is if they can make a little profit from it.

    --
    Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    1. Re:This is what we've been looking for people by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
      I wonder how you think we should advertise these thing. As we have received no attention and are struggling to make ends meet.

      We have been submitted to Slashdot but they deigned not to bother drawing attention to our site at LOCA RECORDS but are happy for some crappy eighties band...

      No wonder new music is finding it hard to get an audience as everyone seem to be looking backwards these days...

      --
      ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    2. Re:This is what we've been looking for people by ertdredge · · Score: 1

      There's always fairtunes (now musiclink).

      Also tipjar.com, and there were others that I can't think of off hand.

      - Ert

  7. Introspective? by mrAgreeable · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know their music to say just how introspective their songs may be, but since this is a collection of previously released songs I think it's fair to say the word you're looking for is "retrospective."

  8. umm by shaklee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the links for download do not work

  9. 10 maximum on their FTP server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are less than 10 of us on Slashdot, right?

    *cough*

    Mirror, mirror, who's got the mirror.

    1. Re:10 maximum on their FTP server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fewer

    2. Re:10 maximum on their FTP server by True+Freak · · Score: 1

      ncftpget -r 99999 ftp://ftp.anythingbox.com/pub/album.zip

      'Nuff Said. Got mine already.

      --
      My comments may be crap...but they are my crap...and I am brave enough to stand by them...Never post as AC!
  10. It's not too bad... by phaln · · Score: 2, Informative

    But this has been available for 6 months. The first track is probably the best of the lot.

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    1. Re:It's not too bad... by ergonal · · Score: 1
      The first track is probably the best of the lot.

      Isn't it always?

    2. Re:It's not too bad... by kasperd · · Score: 1

      The first track is probably the best of the lot.

      It really is.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  11. other recent free music by rehabdoll · · Score: 5, Informative

    There has been some "free anti-war" music recently.
    http://www.marchofdeath.com/ & http://www.beastieboys.com/

    Dont whine, its free! :)

    1. Re:other recent free music by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Great! Now if I could only get some of those (other) pro-Saddam songs they're playing on Iraqi media... at least those are in a language I can't understand.

      (Prediction: this post will be moderated.)

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:other recent free music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean you can understand the Beastie Boys? I'm impressed.

    3. Re:other recent free music by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      No, I just said the songs were in a language I could understand. (I think...)

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    4. Re:other recent free music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The songs are probrable worse than even the Free Software Song by Stallman.

      Then again, who would expect pro-Saddam songs to be any good?

    5. Re:other recent free music by Cplus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Peace Not War is a website dedicated to an album of anti-war music. Not available freely as teh others, but free to listen. The downside is that it does contain "self-evident" by Ani Difranco, which if you've never heard it before...........don't. Not her best work. Great tune by Massive Attack though.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  12. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehe...
    What an obvious troll!
    If someone actually bites, I'm going to laugh my head off.

  13. The REAL March Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sayitaintso.com/sayit0204/march_mad_020 4.html

  14. Mirrors + I like to hear this news by jago25_98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I hear the music I'll examine it as well and see how I can use it to create and mix with my own tunes.

    This sort of thing much appreciated.

    Could do with a few mirrors though eh? If only BITTORRENT/similar came with http/tcp-ip!?

    1. Re:Mirrors + I like to hear this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I hear the music I'll examine it as well and see how I can use it to create and mix with my own tunes

      They didn't give you rights to do that... it's not free, it's 'freeware'.

    2. Re:Mirrors + I like to hear this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a mirror.

  15. ROI? by Dylan2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So... can I give them money then or do I just download it? Where is their ROI? Despite what many Slashdotters seem to think on these threads you can't make a (good) album just by clicking a mouse over some menus a couple of times, it does take time, skill and talent. Just like coding, even with point-and-clicky IDEs.

    So maybe they don't want to make any money but I can just see a whole bunch of people using this as a precedent to force all musicians to give their work away for free.

    Put it this way, if they choose to do it, that's great, but if they do it for a full-time job they are not earning money for as long as it takes to the record. Who pays the bills during that time?

    This is exactly how software works, I don't see why it should be different for music.

    Again, great that we can get this album for free, but that doesn't mean *every* album *must* be free as well.

    --
    Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
    1. Re:ROI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, great that we can get this album for free, but that doesn't mean *every* album *must* be free as well.

      Yes it does. Any information that can be copied by computer (which means just about the entire recorded knowledge of the human race) now has a market value of zero because of the Internet (according to the "if we can get it for free, why pay" crowd).

      That'll about wrap it up for the rest of the economy. Make sure you turn the lights out and lock the door.

    2. Re:ROI? by swazi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Who pays the bills during that time?

      Maybe they're hoping for a live show or two getting slashdotted?

    3. Re:ROI? by srowen · · Score: 1

      Presumably they are also selling this album on CD. Paradoxically, giving it away on MP3 may increase CD sales, I think.

      Since this album would probably have otherwise not have gotten much attention at all, I don't think that giving it away eats into CD sales much. And now, some people may go out and buy the CD because they like the music and want to reward Anything Box, or just want it on CD for easy play in a car or portable CD player.

      I think this approach is going to benefit small artists more than big ones. No one will be forced to give away music, I'm sure, but this may cause people to start asking whether Mariah Carey's latest pointless album is worth $18, while Anything Box is free...

  16. Because it's bundled by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tar is available on every modern computing platform

    Unlike zip, tar is not bundled with Microsoft Windows ME and Microsoft Windows XP operating systems.

    and doesn't waste time trying to compress uncompressible files.

    Neither does zip -0.

    Sometimes it's easy to forget there's more to packaging utilities than ZIP.

    What other packaging format is supported by a program that comes bundled with the standard distribution of Microsoft Windows operating systems?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Because it's bundled by Entropy_ah · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I don't believe windows come with a zip utility.
      Granted most people have winzip on their computer but windows dosent come with it. And winzip does handle tar files.

      --
      my other penis is a vagina
    2. Re:Because it's bundled by zulux · · Score: 1

      Tar is available on every modern computing platform

      Unlike zip, tar is not bundled with Microsoft Windows ME and Microsoft Windows XP operating system

      Re-read that again.... he said modern computing platform

      Not legacy crap with 16-bit thunking code, self-corupting filesystems and NetBIOS over TCP/IP for file-sharing.

      Evry decent OS has tar: OS X, Unix, *BSD, Vax, AIX, IRIX, QNX, hell even my TRS-80 CoCo had Tar with OS-9.

      Get with the program.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:Because it's bundled by themadmoney · · Score: 2, Informative

      i don't know what winzip you are using, but the version i have can definitely handle both tar and gzip files

      http://winzip.com/aboutzip.htm

    4. Re:Because it's bundled by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      >> I don't believe windows come with a zip utility. send to -> compress folder. Super simple.

      Older versions of windows didn't have it but that does matter since choosing to not be up to date isn't a fault of windows.

    5. Re:Because it's bundled by De+Lemming · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't believe windows come with a zip utility.

      As the parent post mentioned, zip functionality is bundeled with WinXP and WinME. It's not a separate utility, but its integrated in Windows Explorer. In explorer, zip files open as normal directories (and by right clicking files in explorer you can zip them).

      So you don't need WinZip to handle zip files. But Windows doesn't know about tar or gzip files, so you still have to use WinZip for those.

  17. The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by puto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, I just downloaded six of their songs from another source(ends with lite)

    Six songs should be enough to pass judgement.

    Listening to this makes me feel like I am the loner in a John Hughes movie that has been forsaken by the popular crowd but I am about to become cool and prove that even the geek can get the girl/friends/car/LAID/ scholarship, papal dispensation.

    It has the poppy vibe of the Pet Shop boys and the whininess of Morrisey after he has spent a night crying on his 'platonic' male friends shoulder(Michael Stipe, anyone else remember their fling, ewwwwww)

    I am an 80s child and love music and went to many concerts(BauHaus, SugarCubes, Cure, Smiths, Escape Club) And Black Flag, Femmes, Dayglow Abortions, Vandals. Did the whole punk thing, and no the Offpsring and Green Day are not punk bands. And the Police were doing ska before most you them were born.

    Cannot remember this band, I remember Kajagoogoo.

    Just when I thought I would never hear another whiney voice like Morrisey, I listen to this and wow, I am back in a dark bar with with everyone all dressed in black eating X and grinding up on each other. Smoking marlboro lights and pretending I am Andrew Macarthy in Less than Zero.

    Honestly it is better than the dance music you here in clubs today, it is soft on the ears and you can shake a leg to it. I could see being in a crowd and bopping to it, and maybe putting the moves on the old lady, kindy scmaltzy and sexy at the same time.

    As for buying it. Dunno, as I write this and I am listening to it and it grows on me. I might order it, cause it brings back some memories, and every now and then the old krewe and I embark on nights out fueled by memories, music, and other remnants of the 80s, and it would be a good cd to slip in.

    I give it an 8, cause you can dance to it. Denny Theriot, theres a man!

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    1. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      it is soft on the ears and you can shake a leg to it. I could see being in a crowd and bopping to it, and maybe putting the moves on the old lady
      "Shake a leg"? "Bopping"? You know that people haven't talked like that in at least 20 years right?
    2. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Smoking marlboro lights and pretending I am Andrew Macarthy in Less than Zero.

      Well, be glad you weren't pretending that you were Robert Downey, Jr. in Less that Zero.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    3. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by Damek · · Score: 1
      I give it an 8, cause you can dance to it.


      Yeah, but my girlfriend wants to know, does it have a beat?
    4. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, dude. Sometimes I think I feel old, and then someone like you comes along and confirms it.

      I mean, honestly. Did you just read what you typed?

      Face it. Children of the 80's=Old Farts!

    5. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by jred · · Score: 1

      Hell, now they're playing "new" bands on the classic rock station :) Classic rock???

      Geez.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    6. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less Than Zero, you dumb fuck.

    7. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by Om242 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just to add to this:

      This has been one of my favorite bands since 1991. I've been to their concerts quite a bit, hung out with the band at an Austin gig, autographs, the works.

      They are mentioned on Slashdot? Freaking WIERD.

      Here's a little history of this band, in case your curious.

      This band is really a one hit wonder when it comes to popularity. Everyone remembers 'Living in Oblivion', their big hit (on their debut album) when their label was Epic.

      After that first album (and one hit) they had a fight with Epic and they got dropped. During this time, they recorded an album titled 'Worth'. It was never officially released, but if you can find it, I strongly recommend it. It was recorded when they visited Germany. Very depressing synthpop with a remake of a Beatles song on it.

      They had one more album after 'Worth', which was called 'Hope' (anyone seeing a trend?), which didnt have near the sales as the one hit wonder from Epic. Its VERY synth-pop-happy music. Almost bubble-gum synth. Very cool album if your into that sort of thing.

      At this point, Dania (the only chick in the band) left, and Claude (the singer, and main songwriter) split off and did a solo album under the band name: 'The Diary'. Very good stuff, I thought. He also released this album (and the previous Hope album) on his own label called 'Orangewerks'.

      Finally, after almost forgetting about this band (and the good times I had with friends at their concerts) they released another album around 1998. They dropped the synth deal, and went guitar (yikes!). It sucks, I thought, EXCEPT the song 'Heaven60', which is available for download now, as per the topic. Heaven60 is one of their best songs, and really shows the band maturing.

      HOWEVER, they tried one last ditch effort to get popular again by making a video for the song on their album titled '45'. Its a 45 second song, you see. Its also the lamest song I've ever heard. Claude hoped that MTV will give them at least 45 seconds of air time. The video is this cheese-fest! The band members are dressed up like robots (or something) playing on a stage in the Nevada desert with some carboard circular spiral thing behind them. uhhh... okay, whatever.

      Havent heard anything since that album until recently (about 2 months ago) I went to yet another Anything Box gig in Houston (at a goth club called 'Spy'). Their show completely sucked. I couldnt believe how far they had sunk. They ripped off the entire audience by singing about 4 songs, and ending the night with 'Living in Oblivion', the only song anyone else even gives a shit about, and walked off the stage. VERY un-Claude-like since he's a very cool person. Ahh well.. everyone has a right to suck every once in a while.

      Anyway, thats probably all the history you wanted (of the band you never heard of) for one night. All in all, the above reviewer pretty much has it right about this band. Its very very very 80s.

      Enjoy Heaven60.

      ++Om242

    8. Re:The Smiths marry the Pet Shop Boys by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 1

      Erm, the Police didn't/don't play ska.

      Try looking at the Specials, Selector, Bad Manners or even the English Beat, but the Police are really stretching it.

      There is no doubt that the Police had some ska infused songs, but nothing that would really pass for ska in any serious sense.

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
  18. Come on, 10 users? by ralphus · · Score: 4, Informative

    post a link on slashdot to a FTP site with a 10 user max? I'll be waiting months to download this.

    ERROR
    The requested URL could not be retrieved

    An FTP authentication failure occurred while trying to retrieve the URL: ftp://ftp.anythingbox.com/pub/album.zip

    Squid sent the following FTP command:

    USER anonymous

    and then received this reply

    Sorry, the maximum number of allowed clients (10) already connected.

    Your cache administrator is root.
    Generated Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:41:47 GMT by localhost.localdomain (Squid/2.4.STABLE7)

    --
    Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    1. Re:Come on, 10 users? by kasperd · · Score: 1

      post a link on slashdot to a FTP site with a 10 user max? I'll be waiting months to download this.

      I used wget, it automatically retried. In fact it managed to start the download already at the fifth attempt. Either I was very lucky, or it is not that difficult to get access to. I wonder if that limit really is just 10.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  19. If the program is not listed, click Other. by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    tar is far better for that kind of thing than zip

    Even if 90 percent of users will see nothing but an error message? "Click the program you want to use to open 'foo.tar'. If the program is not listed, click Other."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:If the program is not listed, click Other. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they won't. Windows utils can extract tars as well.

    2. Re:If the program is not listed, click Other. by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what Windows you are running, but I just ran a test and in its default setup, Windows XP Home Edition has no idea how to open tar.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
  20. What a 'free' music license would allow you to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    make derivitive works as simple as small modifications to morphing the work into a completely different product; ie, the right to build on this music and incorporate it into other music. It would also contain the 'source code', that is, the music tracs in what ever composing softrware they used

    as the slashdot title says, this is more 'freeware' than 'free'

  21. Free music business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Release music for free
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  22. You would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the /. editors would be kind enough to provide a mirror of the MP3's, especially since that the music is FREE. But nooo.. instead we must decimate their server instead.

    1. Re:You would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...instead we must decimate their server...

      Personal bugbear this. The use of the word decimate to mean widespread carnage or death and destruction is just plain wrong. It comes from the latin decimat, 'To take as a tenth'. It describes the Roman practice of punishment for mutiny or cowardice. They would line up the guilty division of soldiers on an aquaduct and push every tenth man over the edge.

    2. Re:You would think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, I'd moderate you -1, Offtopic. Since I don't, I'll bite.

      You are correct as far as that being a single correct usage, but I have a trusty dictionary with me which specifies multiple definitions.

      To inflict great destruction or damage on

      Don't come to a battle of wits unarmed.

    3. Re:You would think... by gamakitty · · Score: 1

      *falls on face laughing* good times for all ;) but i do wonder if "anything box" was aware of the posting.

  23. geek synth by ilovechristy · · Score: 1

    Geek culture and synthpop finding a union on /. - This has gotta be a dream come true. I've dug this group since 89'. Check it out if you can login to the ftp server.

  24. Profits? Not anymore.... by sailor420 · · Score: 1

    Now that they will be selling their bodily fluids to pay for the ISP charges, I think we can count on other people not following suit with free albums ;-)

  25. Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MP3 results in very low quality audio. Vorbis yields much better results for lossy audio.

    1. Release mp3s -> people want better quality
    2. ???
    3. Profit!!

    They're using mp3s for promotion of their music... what the music industry should be treating low quality mp3s on kazaa as...

    1. Re:Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go read www.hydrogenaudio.org or kill yourself. i suggest the later.

  26. only a few tries by westphalia999 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that, I got on it my 43rd try. Wget is a beautiful thing.

    --
    ..this is but a fantasy..
    1. Re:only a few tries by chefmonkey · · Score: 1


      --12:56:52-- ftp://ftp.anythingbox.com/pub/album.zip
      (try:316) => `album.zip'
      Connecting to ftp.anythingbox.com[161.58.207.147]:21... connected.
      Logging in as anonymous ...

      --> USER anonymous

      530 Sorry, the maximum number of allowed clients (10) already connected.

      The server refuses login.
      Retrying.


      *sigh*

  27. album.zip mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    album.zip mirror here

    1. Re:album.zip mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got an IP? Domain doesn't resolve for me... neither do the authoritative NS for the zone know what it is.

    2. Re:album.zip mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. It occurs to me... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that basically, as I have been led to understand it, the record companies make virtually all of the money on record sales. The money made by the artists truly comes from doing tours and other live performances.

    It seems to me that these guys are actually on to something. If they give the music away free, it does NOTHING to discourage anyone from coming to see them live. In fact, it goes a long way to encourage it with all the extra "good will" and generosity the band will be perceived with. THIS is the move bigger artists should experiment with at this point. I think it could at least be educational to test the notion.

    Forget about secure digital formats and all that DRM crap, let's share the art and go see their shows if we love'm! Let the band publish their own CDs and sell'm themselves from their web site using paypal as a convenient means of payment.

    Independent is the only way to keep the artists from being screwed, I think...

    1. Re:It occurs to me... by gmajor · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the record companies have Marketing departments which inform the public of the shows and get the crowd out.

      If a band were to bypass using a record company, then the burden of marketing their shows would fall to them. Unless, of course, their music is so good that it generated enough buzz. This may happen to a few, but not all.

    2. Re:It occurs to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'course, only a few businesses are ever successful, not all, so that fits.

      "Don't quit your day job" is a good mantra.

    3. Re:It occurs to me... by Mind+Socket · · Score: 1
      Independent is the only way to keep the artists from being screwed, I think...


      Agreed, but who pays for it then? The reason more bands haven't done this is that studio time and tours cost money. It's often said that a record deal is like a bank loan that has to be repaid, without this initial injection of cash, getting something like this off the ground is harder.

      I'd love to see this happen more, so that alternatives to cheesy pop rubbish are more readily available. Unfortunately, as long as the words "music" and "industry" sit side by side, marketing and money will reign supreme.

      On the flip-side, the advances in technology are driving down the production costs and complexity at a blinding rate. Once online distribution channels settle and rewrite the law books, musicians and consumers can hopefully start working towards a fairer system.
  29. Anything Box by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a minute I thought this article was about an X-Box hack. Maybe one that would allow games from any other vendor to be played on the X-Box.

    Guess not.

    --
    Huh?
  30. More Free music by ahaning · · Score: 1

    Guitar-Idiot by Foofus

    "...feel free to share copies with whomever; I am not in this for the money." -Mr. Rufus Faloofus in an email to me.

    Each a Separate World is probably the better track in that compilation. Many of them were actually written by others. I also really enjoy Even Here We Are, originally written by Paul Westerberg. Somewhere Over the Rainbow is a little painful to listen to, though. The tough notes and the crappy encoding are most of the problem.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  31. Someone needs to introduce these folks to P2P by ewanrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rather than trying to make their album available on their own site, they should have been led by their chief techie to the P2P networks. In fact, I suspect the folks at Sherman Networks would have loved to help promote this as another Legal use of Kazaa.

    So, anyone who's already posted this around and has the song list to look for?

  32. Those cost money by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Windows utils can extract tars as well.

    Are you sure that the utility built into Windows ME and Windows XP can extract .tar files in addition to .zip files? Or are you talking about those WinZip/WinRAR/WinACE programs that cost $30?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Those cost money by kasperd · · Score: 1

      programs that cost $30?

      No problem. Windows users would rather pay for software than having something of a better quality for freee. After all why would they otherwise use Windows?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  33. Yes it is by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I don't believe windows come with a zip utility.

    I have used a computer with a stock installation of Microsoft Windows ME, and it came with "Microsoft Compressed Folders" integrated into the shell.

    I have used a computer with a stock installation of Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, and it also came with "Microsoft Compressed Folders" integrated into the shell.

    Granted, Windows 98 and Windows 2000 don't come with those tools, but virtually all x86 computers sold today through major channels to home users come with Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition operating system software.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  34. Public Enemy did an "Open Source" album by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, kinda anyway. It was called Revolverlution. They put some tracks out, including the title track and a lot of other old loop tracks that you could sample and mix. There was some deadline, and at the end, Chuck D. and Flav listened to all the tracks and took a couple of them on the album. Not a bad disk, worth getting. If for no other reason the track "Gotta Give The Peeps What They Need" was banned from MTV for the the words "free Mumia and H. Rap Brown". MTV said no, too political. PE said no editing, it goes out as is. Then MTV said "well, if you cut out the word 'free' then it's cool". Chuck said you gotta be crazy telling a black man he can't use the word free, and it never will get aired.

    They're very comfortable with the online stuff. They released their previous 2 albums online. They had a remix album called "Bring the Noise 2000". Def Jam didn't want to release it, didn't think there was a market. So Chuck and Flav said "hey we did the work already, let them hear the music" and released it on MP3, some server somewhere. Def Jam said no, said "even though we're not gonna release it, we OWN you, and you can't release it". Chuck got pissed, didn't like being owned by anyone, pulled the tracks (though a lot of people including me already had the tracks) and released the song "Swindler's Lust" with some pretty harsh elbows thrown at Russel Simmon's chest. This track and a few others got compiled to "There's a Poison Going On" which was released on MP3. Was $8 for a download, $10 if you wanted them to send you a disk - Chuck autographed those. Problem is, this was released on AtomicPop.com, which has since gone under. Was weird having an album you could get from Chuck and Flav for $8 (or like mine, for $10 with autograph) with all the money going to the artists, being sold at Virgin Megastore for $17.99, with maybe a buck going to them. No autograph even, such a gyp.

    Check out http://www.BringTheNoise.com/ for some of the history and some live rap feeds. http://www.PublicEnemy.com/ well, for Public Enemy.

  35. These Guys Must Be Communists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hang them.

  36. WinZip != MS Compressed Folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wasn't talking about Nico Mak WinZip but rather about Microsoft Compressed Folders, which is built into Windows ME and XP.

    1. Re:WinZip != MS Compressed Folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you know that nico mak (niko mak) means "fuck your mother" in arabic? i'm not kidding.

  37. What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Re-read that again.... he said modern computing platform

    In that case, if you claim that the operating system in use on 95+ percent of the audience's computers is not a "modern computing platform", then whether or not tar is bundled with a "modern computing platform" is not all that relevant now, is it?

    Not legacy crap with 16-bit thunking code, self-corupting filesystems

    You're talking about Windows Millennium Edition. Microsoft has since released Windows XP Home Edition based on the NT kernel, which has fixed many of these issues. It is bundled with a zip utility but apparently not with a tar utility.

    and NetBIOS over TCP/IP for file-sharing.

    More like KaZaA over TCP/IP for file-sharing.

    Evry decent OS has tar

    What percent of the band's audience uses a "decent OS" by your definition?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by zulux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In that case, if you claim that the operating system in use on 95+ percent of the audience's computers is not a "modern computing platform", then whether or not tar is bundled with a "modern computing platform" is not all that relevant now, is it?

      95+ ! Hah - more like 90% and falling.

      Windows is marketshare in servers, desktops and developers keeps on sinking. It's will always be a somewhat viable choice for new-users, but the days of it's dominace are over.

      Microsoft has since released Windows XP Home Edition based on the NT kernel, which has fixed many of these issues.

      XP is a good effort against Microsoft's old operating systems, but against to other vendor's - it's a sad joke. Fuck - Apple makes a better Windows-compatable file-serving OS than the people who make Windows. That should tell you somthing.

      No super-computer runs Windows.
      No root domain server runs Windows.
      No satelite runs Windows.
      No large-scale database runs Windows.
      No cave system runs Windows.
      No militaty flight simulator run Windows.
      No bank runs it's federal transations on Windows.

      Of all the important thing that computers do - hardly anthing important runs Windows. There's a reason for this.

      Sure, MS has most the desktop video-game market, most of the simple spread-sheet market and simple document creation market to itself - but nothing really of importance.

      What percent of the band's audience uses a "decent OS" by your definition?

      10%. One in 10. Enough, that they should have a .tar .

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by Chuu · · Score: 1

      Most windows users know what to do with a .zip, and exactly what a .zip file is. Most unix/linux users know how to deal with .zip. Most windows users will not know what to do with a .tar. If you really want to package all of your files in an archive format, I think .zip is the correct choice here.

      P.S.

      That 90% figure is also a bit suspect, especially considering the target audience. Using your production servers to grab archives of mp3's is a definate nono. The target here is end users, which for all intents and purposes means windows users. Also, as above, most mac users grin and bear it when they have to deal with zip files. In fact, .tar is probably harder for the average mac user to deal with then .zip even though OSX is bsd at its core since .sit is the standard archive format over there.

    3. Re:What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      You know, every fact in this rant was also true 5 years ago, yet MS is still dominating the numbers today. In other words, thanks for the pointless post.

    4. Re:What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only on Slashdot...:

      • Major site posts link to washed-up synthpop band (redundancy?) and their FTP server with 10 user maximum.
      • While twiddling thumbs, discussion of said synthpop band devolves into a .zip vs .tar flamefest.
      • Within three posts, said flamefest becomes a Windows vs. *n?x vs. Mac OS flamewar.

      Only on Slashdot. This is why I read Slashdot.

    5. Re:What percent use a "modern ... decent OS"? by justin_speers · · Score: 1

      On Windows desktop share:
      95+ ! Hah - more like 90% and falling.

      Well we can argue about a ticky tacky few percentage points here, or we can reclaim some sanity and just say "MOST PEOPLE WHO WILL DOWNLOAD THE MP3s ARE RUNNING WINDOWS"...???

      Windows is marketshare in servers, desktops and developers keeps on sinking. It's will always be a somewhat viable choice for new-users, but the days of it's dominace are over.
      Do you live in a cave? It's one thing to advocate alternative OS's, it's another thing entirely to act as if you haven't talked to the average computer user EVER.

      No super-computer runs Windows. No root domain server runs Windows. No satelite runs Windows. No large-scale database runs Windows. No cave system runs Windows. No militaty flight simulator run Windows. No bank runs it's federal transations on Windows
      And this matters to the average person who would download MP3s from this band because...???

      Sure, MS has most the desktop video-game market, most of the simple spread-sheet market and simple document creation market to itself - but nothing really of importance.

      Nothing really of importance huh? Then why isn't Microsoft bankrupt? Why are they always accused of being a monopoly? I'd say all the servers and desktops out there running MS Windows are important. Millions of people use Windows, that IS important.

      What percent of the band's audience uses a "decent OS" by your definition?

      10%. One in 10. Enough, that they should have a .tar .


      So if you were that band, would you distribute it as a .tar file?
      You'd be silly to do that, because you'd be confusing the vast majority of your target audience. Don't be silly, them using ZIP files doesn't hurt you at all, what are you complaining about???

  38. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mirror works! If there's something nasty about the zip I'll reply to this. Otherwise, it looks good!

    MOD UP!

    1. Re:MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD DOWN

      Mirror does NOT work.

  39. Information Society...? by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Information Society (Kurt Harland, et al) get them signed? I saw them open up for IS back in the mid 90's; and they were a really great band/show.

    Haven't heard anything from InSoc in the past few years, but I'm glad that there are still some 80's synth-pop-pro-techno's still around making good music and advancing the music industry with advanced distribution methods....

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Information Society...? by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

      InSoc broke up shortly after I saw them in St. Louis (with Anything box and Tea42 opening -- it was actually InSoc's last show ever, I later found out).

      I'm not sure about them signing AB, but the tour definitely helped them. I'd actually found them by accident (one of those "let's try this $1 tape" kind of things); I was totally stoked that they were opening for them.

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

    2. Re:Information Society...? by acb · · Score: 1

      Kurt released a solo album as InSoc a few years ago on goth label Cleopatra. It was the sort of dark, fucked-up take-a-walk-in-my-nightmare industriogoth music that aging synthpop stars (think Gary Numan and Marc Almond) wishing to make a comeback did before electroclash became cool. He also released a CD of pretty bad "dark" remakes of old InSoc songs, with rougher vocals and more industrial stylings, whose only redeeming feature was the old-skool InSoc videos on the CD.

      Not sure what has happened since then; for all I know he could have tossed the whole goth thing in and jumped on the electroclash bandwagon doing songs about snorting cocaine with movie stars in limousines or something.

    3. Re: Information Society...? by Omniscient+Ferret · · Score: 1

      Kurt Harland's making video game music, and occassionally goofing around with Counterstrike samples. His bandmate Paul Robb did the soundtrack for Orgazmo, commercials, and various other stuff.

  40. More free music, C=64 nostalgia of sorts... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

    Since the subject of releasing music for free cam up, I couldn't resist mentioning a band and site I just happened to stumble upon that has quite a few really good tunes available for download in MP3 *and* OGG format: http://machinaesupremacy.com/.

    Their take on "Giana Sisters" as well as their "Sidology" tunes are great nostalgia as well as great modern versions of the old C=64 classics. There are quite a few other good songs as well. Check them out!

  41. For what it's worth by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    On the topic today I came across a band called "Toasted Heretic".

    Irish (IIRC) 80s drinking type band that made four albums. Doing a google search came up with an interview with the lead singer (there were only 400 hits, so it's not hard to find, top ten search hit) who had written a book. In any case, during the interview about his bok, the subject of sharing tunes came up. The lead singer was *extremely critical of the music business and encouraged fans to download his tunes wherever they could be found. I believe that even the lead guitarist had uploaded some to mp3.com.

    It was nice to see that non-hit bands felt the same way we do.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  42. Gamers, writers, and spreadsheetists buy records by yerricde · · Score: 1

    No super-computer runs Windows.

    Actually, some personal supercomputers do run emulated Windows.

    No large-scale database runs Windows.

    No large-scale database runs Windows on the server side (except possibly for a few isolated MS SQL data centers), but most commercial database management systems have a Windows front end available, and a DBA may be listening to MP3s on the same machine he administers the database from.

    No militaty flight simulator run Windows.

    No "military" or no "United States military"? Rumors have gone around that the terrorists who performed the kamikaze attack on the World Trade Center had practiced the attack using Microsoft Flight Simulator. Who knows what other countries' air forces train on?

    No bank runs it's federal transations on Windows.

    But a lot of banks run the client side of the online banking applications on Windows. "IE only" anyone? Account holders buy records.

    Sure, MS has most the desktop video-game market, most of the simple spread-sheet market and simple document creation market to itself - but nothing really of importance.

    Importance? We're talking a band here. A band's job in the market is to produce recordings that a label publishes. The people who buy records are the people who play desktop video games, write spreadsheets, and create simple documents.

    Enough, that they should have a .tar .

    And rent twice the server space, when almost everybody who has GNU tar probably also has a copy of Info-ZIP's UnZip lying around?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  43. I've got an idea. by CerebusUS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's post an ftp site with a 10 user limit to a website known for sending hundreds of thousands of connections per minute.

    I'd be willing to bet this link was even unavailable for those TotalSlashdot subscribers.

    I'd love to hear this music. if anyone is mirroring the zip file, please let us know.

  44. If you can't get onto the FTP... by Vic+Metcalfe · · Score: 1

    ...and you want to support their work, check out this order form for CDs:

    http://www.anythingbox.com/form.htm

    (Yes, I realize that you can't then try before you buy, but I'd prefer to take a chance on these guys than a lot of CDs in the store.)

  45. Music industry meddling == Lower Sales? by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The article stated:
    ... how the music business in general operates. They manipulate the artists' work as well as take huge cuts of musicians' profits.
    That is so very true. My listening habits have evolved to the point where I listen only to artists who I respect as musicians. I don't want to listen to groups with any of the following qualities:
    • Created in a boardroom by suits
    • Sex symbolism more important than musicianship
    • Underdog in engineered, artificial controversy
    • Willing to change fundamental values to increase profit
    • Cannot write their own music
    • Inane, cliché-filled lyrics
    • No innovation
    What is bad for the music industry is that this makes my purchasing activities as limited as my listening activities. Because so many of today's alleged artists can answer "yes" to one or more of the above points, I simply don't buy very much music. I know many people who feel the same way. Certainly, we are outnumbered by consumers of the "fickle sheep" variety, but I do wonder how much money the industry loses because it refuses to address my wishes as a listener.

    One of my favorite quotes addresses this subject. It is from the Rush's "The Spirit of Radio" (words by Neal Peart (the drummer)).

    One likes to believe in the freedom of music,
    But glittering prizes and endless compromises
    Shatter the illusion of integrity
    I also like what Pink Floyd's "Have a Cigar" has to say about the music industry.
    --

    Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

    1. Re:Music industry meddling == Lower Sales? by gamakitty · · Score: 1

      "Certainly, we are outnumbered by consumers of the "fickle sheep" variety, but I do wonder how much money the industry loses because it refuses to address my wishes as a listener." I ask myself the same question and I always end up deciding: not much. Today's pop culture phenomenon is much the same as any major media movement. It's "major" meaning that lots of people are buying into it. why they bother is beyond me, but maybe it'll provoke another counter movement, and that's always fun. the intrigue of the underground is ever present! bwhahaha. *giggle*

    2. Re:Music industry meddling == Lower Sales? by MacrosTheBlack · · Score: 1

      Extra point to add...

      Don't / Can't play instruments

      My pet peeve is how the latest manufactured group of 'singers' is labeled a band. It's not a band, it's a group! A band plays instruments and sings. Standing on stage with a microphone does not make you a band. Hell, I'm not even sure if it makes you talented these days.

      BRING BACK REAL TALENT!

  46. Re:So Post the sigs already! :) by Salamanders · · Score: 1

    Share the wealth, post the sig2dats for the 6 songs you found if they are good quality. (Can't understand why they wouldn't do that at the website... afraid of appearing to lend legitimacy to Kazaa? Dunno.)

  47. I wanted to go to an Austin show ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    but like most of the other concerts I wanted to go to while in school, I was working that night :)

    The first album is the one that made me like AB; I could never understand why they did not achieve the popularity that bands like PSB and Erasure (justly) achieved ... at the summer education program I used to go to (and later worked for) we played Living in Oblivion at every dance, so it has sentimental value for me.

    "Hope" is a great album -- I got it from a friend whose cousin had ordered several from (I think I remember correctly) Orangewerks. Since then, I've happened upon a few weird AB releases / singles; since you're more knowledgeable about the band than I am, you probably know (and have ;)) the EP called -- I think -- "Dance," with remixes of Where is Love and Happiness, etc. "Worth" is just more depressing than I want in an album ...

    I really like (what I perceive at least about) Anything Box's attitude toward their fans, which is to say that they seem really friendly and appreciative toward the people who like their music. It's a refreshing attitude, for some reason ;)

    I'm going to finish my email to the band urging them to use Ogg Vorbis instead of (or in addition to) MP3; wonder what they'll say.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  48. Bad deals...etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They manipulate the artists' work as well as take huge cuts of musicians' profits."

    holy shit, if they do then that was in the contract you signed. if a musician signs a contract without reading it, or accepts these kinds of clauses as a tradeoff for getting to be a big famous rockstar, then they deserve what they get. it's ridiculous to put the blame on the record companies.

    this is how the business works, record company makes contract that is very, very good for them, sends it to band. band is supposed to read it with a lawyer, and then change it so it is overwhelmingly good for them, then send it back to company. company's lawyer reads the contract and accepts a few changes, denies a bunch, and adds in a few clauses that make it better for the company...this continues, it's called negotiation. the band that doesn't negotiate until the contract is to their liking is a band that does not deserve to cry later on.

    everyone and their mom knows that record companies are big bad evil businesses that just want money. but if the record company wants you enough, then you can end up with a very decent contract...if you're desperate for fame, and you sign the first piece of paper they send you, then i have no sympathy...

    i am constantly blown away by the naive childish attitude that everyone seems to have towards the music industry. of course they want to make money. of course they will give the artists as little as they have to. these are not new thoughts, everyone's known this for a long time. i don't get why you people constantly defend and support these people who were either high as a kite when they signed, or too stupid to get a lawyer, or for whatever reason they signed a bad deal, and now have a bad deal that they're legally bound to. there are so many people out there who have it so bad, and it's not their fault. yet you people spend so much time worrying about the starving artists who made the decision to go this route.

    to end on a happy note, it is possible to get a record deal that is very good for the artist, even with a major label. you have to be in a position where the record company wants you, ie. you must be a good band, and have a good image. if you are not in a position where the recording company wants you, then you are not cut out for the big music business, you're SOL, and if you then go and sign a deal with a major, it will not be good for you, so don't do it. but it is possible to get a great contract, to work with good people, and to make a decent living from rock 'n roll, i know first hand...

    1. Re:Bad deals...etc... by keyslammer · · Score: 1

      if they do then that was in the contract you signed. if a musician signs a contract without reading it, or accepts these kinds of clauses as a tradeoff for getting to be a big famous rockstar, then they deserve what they get. it's ridiculous to put the blame on the record companies.

      In spite of the fact that you're probably trolling, you raise an interesting point: people are free to enter into contracts that are less than equitable.

      I firmly believe in the right of individuals to enter into contract, but there are some problems here. For one thing, contracts are intended to represent a "meeting of the minds" - a situation in which all of the terms of the contract are understood by both parties.

      Furthermore, contracts assume a relative "balance of power" between the parties: each has something the other wants that cannot be taken by force.

      Both of these ideals would seem to be subverted by a fundamental imbalance of power between the parties when one is a large conglomerate and the other is a starving artist. The starving artist needs the record company much more than they need him, and so he's willing to accept a deal that is inequitable or maybe even incomprehensible to him.

      Ideally, this kind of situation should be alleviated by competition. So if company A is offering you a crappy deal, go to company B. But what if there are only 5 major companies and each is offering the same deal?

      Obviously, this problem exists beyond the scope of the record industry. It manifests itself in everything from shrink-wrapped EULs to employee non-compete agreements.

      It's a complicated problem. I hate to see government intervention in these kinds of matters, but I also hate to see the little guys get screwed by a system that is controlled by the big guys. I'm hopeful that as technology lowers the barriers to entry into many forms of enterprise, the problem will be solved by lots of competition and the dissolution of the giants.

  49. I met the singer on napster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too funny... I met the lead singer (virtually) on napster way back when. Nice guy.

  50. Half expecting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cats writes "All your base are belong to us." Server have no chance to survive.

  51. Anything Box song I just dl at 300K/sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.audiogalaxy.com/bands/paradoxx/MPEGS/Em p_Dec.mp3


    Wow... sounds like they can shred...

  52. Slashdot Moderators are Fascists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I posted this comment as a joke, or a troll even. I can't believe a call to kill people because they are communists is marked as 'insightful', i expected an immediate -1/troll or -1/flaimbait. Just shows you 'nerds' are a bunch of brainwashed fascists.

    1. Re:Slashdot Moderators are Fascists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually i modded it insightful as a joke. just shows you "wannabe nerds" need to loosen their sphincters

  53. Re:What a 'free' music license would allow you to by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    I agree. That's why I wrote the OSML. It's based on the GPL. Next step is to simplify it and try to make it easier to read. The trickiest part is defining what constitutes the source audio. And before the next revision, I need to decide if I want it to require you to publish binaries (mp3s) for free download, or just make the source available. I'm leaning towards the latter, since that's the way the GPL is, and it'll get more people to use the license. Any thoughts, /.?

    --

    c-hack.com |
  54. Re:um by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    If someone actually bites, I'm going to laugh my head off.

    I've got no teeth, you insensitive clod!
    -- /me slinks off to -1 offtopic. :~(
  55. Got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made it through. Just to see if I actually get it and perhaps I will like it. I will not share it, I will not burn it on CD nor sell it. Nope. I will just listen to it to see if it was worth the download. And it will distract me from the shit we see on TV these days.

  56. Edonkey/mldonkey/lmule/emule Mirror by MicAttAck · · Score: 1

    Well, here it is. I am one of the lucky 10 persons who got to the ftp-server:
    ed2k://|file|Anything Box - Binaural Repeats.zip|40570015|2231120c93f1c5e5ea8a93e3bbe90 051|
    Unfortunately turning this into an "a href" html link does not work because of the special characters, so you need to copy-and-paste.

    --

    -- MicAttAck
    Religon is an insult to human dignity.
    1. Re: Edonkey/mldonkey/lmule/emule Mirror by Omniscient+Ferret · · Score: 1

      Oh cool. This helped me verify that I got the right file from a mirror mentioned here. There's now a Bitzi ticket with a working link for eDonkey, plus Gnutella & Kazaa links.

  57. I want to know what you're thinking..... by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Awwww man, this brings back memories.

    "Tell me what's on your mind".

    PURE ENERGY!

    Da-duh-da-da Duh-da-da-da-da-da

  58. Because Microsoft 0wnz the OEMs by yerricde · · Score: 1

    After all why would they otherwise use Windows?

    Because they can't just walk into the local electronics store and walk out with a Linux machine perhaps?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  59. Synthpop by bloosqr · · Score: 1

    Its probably a bit too late to post to this thread but Anything Box actually played the batcave (nyc) not so long ago (2 years or so?).
    (speaking synth nostalgia redflag played there right around the same time period)

    The synthpop thing has recently been given a revival of sorts lately, especially now w/ its superceded version hip "electroclash" version.

    If you do happen to like any of the anything box songs, take a look at the different drum label.

    Particularly, take a look at De/vision, Wolfsheim, Cosmicity.. (these still get a lot of "club play" btw).. if you like your synths a bit darker and moody, take a look at metropolis records Bands like And One, Covenant, VNV Nation and Apoptygma Bezerk have HUGE followings even here in america.

    Finally, if this synth stuff all seems a bit to cheezy, we can hip you out w/ the electroclash stuff. Most of this is on emperor norton but Fischer spooner, Felix the Housecat, Ladytron, Miss Kitten and the hacker all have pretty big followings currently. (Fischer spooner just got signed to capitol).. Incidentally, and it speaks mostly of where the kids who produce the mtv shows hang out (brooklyn club scene :)), a LOT of the background music to all the real world shows are clips from these bands (if you were curious as to where the music was coming from). One of the offical VH1 segways is actually fischer spooner's emerge now as well. Anyway there is a ton of good stuff out there all w/ huge active followings w/ club nights in many of the major cities as well.

    -bloosqr

  60. You're missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think every post here has missed the point. If they were smart, they would provide "both", ney, all 3 file types.

    A trivial 1-liner (in linux) could turn every file on the server into a tarball _and_ create a corresponding "zip" file.

    So, obviously the smart server system to use in this application is Linux (IMHO).

  61. Download the album here!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://web.njit.edu/~aslam/abox/album.zip

    1. Re:Download the album here!!! by fractralrock · · Score: 1

      Thanks for hosting....

  62. Anything Box is not "80s" anymore! by snrd · · Score: 1

    Hello, I just wanted to let everyone know that Anything Box is still writing and working really hard on new material. Their latest album "The Universe Is Expanding" is lightyears from "Living in Oblivion". The Free album is not a good representation of what the band sounds like right now, unless you focus on the last half of the album. These songs will be posted for 1 week: http://www.knerd.com/~partytricks/ABOX/temp The song "Robotnik" is on Universe is Expanding. "Love is Lo-Fi" is an incomplete, unmastered version from their upcoming album called "The Effects of Stereo TV." PS I know the server sucks but it's not meant for wide-release.. hurry!

  63. Hey, can somebody put the MP3s on Kazaa... by cswilly · · Score: 1

    ...so I can download it.

    Not a joke as their FTP server is maxed out.

  64. Finally Got A Copy by gagravarr · · Score: 1

    I've been tryong to download the album since the article was posted, and I've finally gotten onto the FTP server and pulled a copy down
    So, looks like the /. effect has died down enough that you can now grab a copy, yey!

    --
    This post will enter the public domain 70 years after my death, unless Disney buys another extension.
  65. my problem is keeping track by midgley · · Score: 1

    Supposing I decide the music industry is not wholly beneficial, and choose to play music in my waiting room that is distributed under a free licence of one sort or another.

    It'll play on a Linux box that is there for patients to browse for refercnes etc, or on the reception desk computer.

    But how do I keep track of what is playing, and most importantly of the licencing conditions that allow it to be played.

    As I consider this, I am either faced with writing some sort of licence tracking software, or buying some or hoping it will be all right (it quite likely would be, but...) ... or of course setting up or signing up to the sort of organisation that irritated me in the first place by demanding fees to play records, and from various accounts remitting very little of those fees to the bands or artists that make the music.

    Is there a FLOSS appliation or framework that would serve to show the (UK equivalent of) RIAA inspector that due dilligence or reasonable care had been taken to avoid breaching the licence on CDs?

    If not, should there be - is there a business model?

    FOr a collection of artists, or the universe of artists, maybe there is - shameware, or nagging conscienceware which keeps track of how often you(r staff) play each item, and encourages you to send a donation to where it may do rather more good than to the Sinatra estate or Moody Blues relicts.

    http://www.defoam.net/