Slashdot Mirror


Community Networking Made Easy

Rob Flickenger writes "I for one am sick and tired of all of the work it takes to build out wireless community networks. Evidently, so was the Linksys Community Network: a Real Network project for the masses. It's about time somebody did something to bring Wi-Fi to the People."

78 comments

  1. umm... check the clock, folks by David+E.+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    April Fools jokes are only really funny when posted on April Fools Day. At least here, that day has been over for about half an hour.

    1. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 3, Funny

      And not a moment too soon. Although that Evil Bit article was interesting, and so was the Evil Bit article.

    2. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by DaZedAdAm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget the Evil Bit article and the Evil Bit article!

    3. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Victa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah well, I didn't even start seeing the jokes until the day (1/4) had been over for 8.5 hours, not even taking into account the supposed 12 noon shutoff point...that would make the first joke I saw 20.5 hours late...

    4. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by t0ny · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      April Fools jokes are only really funny when posted on April Fools Day. At least here, that day has been over for about half an hour.

      You forgot to add that they are not funny, tho.

      I thought everyone was just being hyper-critical the other day, but these jokes really were very fuckin stupid. Guess everyone was right.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    5. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by bsharitt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Maybe that's why this one isn't very funny.

    6. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think they really compared with the Evil Bit article, though!

    7. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

      Moreover, we're running out of funny jokes. I haven't seen a moderation over 2 for anything other than funny in over a day!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    8. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by mcdrewski42 · · Score: 1

      You think you got it bad?

      Here in Aus, we've been dealing with 'April Fools' jokes for more than 24h (this story posted at 15:30 April 2).

      <TROLL karma="-1">
      Guess that means everyone in the US has been an April Fool for 15hrs+?
      </TROLL>

      --
      /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += effect; }
    9. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by roolmarty · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. well think how much fun(!) I've had with mod points on April Fools Day...

      Sigh!

    10. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, of course, everyone should defer to your time zone...

    11. Re:umm... check the clock, folks by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      It was still April 01 in my timezone (ObYouInsensitiveClod). ;-)

      Doesn't make the jokes any funnier, though. April Fool's Day pretty much annoys me unless the joke is either really obvious, but well done (like the FIRST time I saw the RFC) or is IMMEDIATELY followed by the addmission that it's a fake (like BBSpot did at the bottom of their fake mailbag feature).

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  2. Wireless pants!? by McG33k · · Score: 0, Troll

    wireless pants! Everyone needs a good pair of wireless pants for when they are away from their woman.

    1. Re:Wireless pants!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. Screw that shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Real Networks have *NO* place on my computer...

    *checks*
    *uninstalls RealPlayer*
    Ahemm, Real Networks have *NO* place on my computer.

    1. Re:Screw that shit... by DarkVein · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to scan your registery and remove any refererences to that real cron thing... realsched or something

      --

      I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

  4. isin't it past your bedtime... by imtheguru · · Score: 1

    what are u still doing up? SP ;)

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
  5. Digital pants.... by grimsweep · · Score: 1
    ...ACTIVATE!

    An oldie, but goodie.

    1. Re:Digital pants.... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Ummm.....

      It would seem your digital pants have crashed. Maybe next time you should run FreeBSD on them, no?

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  6. Not That Funny by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not that funny but people are always leaving the defaults (linksys, tsunami, etc)

    Kids please remember to read the WLAN Security FAQ before playing.

  7. Ubi Sub Ubi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always wear underwear

    1. Re:Ubi Sub Ubi by ralphus · · Score: 1
      It's semper ubi sub ubi!

      I knew my 4 years of Latin would come in handy sometime!

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
  8. How am I supposed to get free broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Internet access wants to be free!

    1. Re:How am I supposed to get free broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Internet access wants to be free!

      So does my dick, but that doesn't mean that it should be!

  9. That's fscking FUNNY, yo! by rco3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, Ha! Ha, Ha. Ha. Ha.

    Ha. Ha. No, really. Ha. Seriously.

    Hey, can we extend this April Fool thing another day? Maybe we could get some other stories duped as well, not just the fiendishly clever and daringly sophisticated RFC3514 repeat joke? Heh. That was really funny, too. Ha. No, no, I mean it. Ha.

    Man, these Slashdot editors know how to party, huh? Parodying themselves, posting the same story Over and OVER and OVER, like they sometimes do UNintentionally... ha. It'd be even funnier if... if... well, if it were funny at all.

    Whoops, I meant, "Ha. That was funny, yo."

    [yawn]

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  10. This just in!! by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny
    Slashdot editors over-do April Fools Jokes in grand fashion! CmdrTaco, site founder, uses this faux holiday to make light of his tendancy to duplicate news submissions with a long running and thoroughly unfunny repeat posting of an "evil bit in IPv4" story! General Tommy Franks will speculate upon this development.....

    Oh wait! Geraldo Rivera has just reported from the front lines that Slashdot editors have indeed made one last unfunny April Fool's post well after the April 1rst UN sanctioned deadline! The violation in question appears to be an equally unfunny LinkSys-does-something-post! Amazing! We have satellite imagery incoming......

    1. Re:This just in!! by REBloomfield · · Score: 1

      So you didn't read the posts then? the bit changes from 5 - 1 in severity. Take a look....

  11. I swear to god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I see one more story about an evil bit and RFC, I am going to come to your houses and fuck you all up. The first story about if the bit is set, it is secure, and if not set it is not secure was cute. The rest were just fucking lame. I mean what the fuck? April Fool's and the editor's can't find any good Fool stories, so they just dupe themselves? God, what a pathetic piece of shit Slashdot is turning into. At least this major shitfest is only once a year. And for some reason Anonymous posting for me was GONE for like 4 days, but today it's back. WTF? I know others were having this problem, though it was only gone on them for like a day.

    Here's a funny joke I just made up right now.

    Q. How many Slashdot editors does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

    A. It's a trick question. VA Software can't afford the lightbulb.

  12. *Slashdot is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *Slashdot is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *Slashdot community
    when IDC confirmed that *Slashdot market share has dropped yet again, now down
    to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all nerds. Coming on the heels of a
    recent barrage of erroneous and not funny April Fool's Day posts that turned off
    readers and crippled all serious discussions on Slashdot
    . A new Netcraft
    survey which plainly states that *Slashdot has lost more market share,
    this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *Slashdot is
    collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing
    dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive
    networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin
    [amdest.com] to predict *Slashdot's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *Slashdot
    faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *Slashdot
    because *Slashdot is dying. Things are looking very bad for *Slashdot. As
    many of us are already aware, *Slashdot continues to lose market share. Red ink
    flows like a river of blood.

    Fact: *Slashdot is dying

  13. Habiiiiiib don't like it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Rock the mud hut, rock the mud hut!

    The huuuundred and first doooon't like it!

    Rock the mud hut! Rock the mud hut!

    drops your bomb's all up in the mud 'a huts!

    The jet pilot tuned to the location of the mud huuuuuuuuutsssss......

    This is not Kosher! Lets call in Israel to join the fun!

  14. Isn't it about time... by wrexsoul · · Score: 1

    For another TCP/IP bit story to be posted?

    You all'd better hurry before midnight!

    --
    - WrexSoul
    \/.
    vvv

  15. Now seriously though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would be nice if there was a way to intelligently bond multiple wireless connections into one. That way if you had multiple access points, say in an apartment building, everyone could share the bandwidth through the walls. I wouldn't mind having 5 cable/dsl connections piped to my laptop.

    Granted, knowing what I do know about wireless collission detection there is a limit to this before it gets counterproductive since it CAN'T detect collisions, it can only warn everyone and pray they play fair.

    I think the only reason something like a wireless "community" isn't considered more seriously is because there's no benefit to having access to more than your own, unless you don't have one to begin with and you're leeching of course.

    1. Re:Now seriously though... by akb · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be nice if there was a way to intelligently bond multiple wireless connections into one.

      Simple.

      Put 2 (or 3) wireless cards in each of 2 boxes. Configure corresponding cards on each machine to be on nonoverlapping channels and as appropriate for connectivity. Configure channel bonding for your OS.

    2. Re:Now seriously though... by akb · · Score: 1

      Sorry to respond twice, didn't catch your last paragraph.

      I think the only reason something like a wireless "community" isn't considered more seriously is because there's no benefit to having access to more than your own, unless you don't have one to begin with and you're leeching of course.

      This sounds like it could have been uttered by someone during the primoridial development of the Internet. "No benefit to having more than your own"?! I've heard someone observe that the value (meant in the same sense you allude to) of a network goes up with the square of the number of people attached to that network.

      Therefore, the challenge before those that believe in community wireless networks is to bootstrap the process so that a network can be built that can support an "interesting" number of participants. Those participants will probably use things like, p2p file sharing, gaming, chatting, location and mapping services, community audio and video content, etc.

    3. Re:Now seriously though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently having more than just one router is not as useful as you'd think unless you're purposefully setting up wide coverage for something like a college campus. There are a few difficulties that need to be overcome, but after that there are a couple paradigms going on here.

      For starters you need to be able to seamless roam between nodes. Having another node there doesn't do you much good if transitioning to it means stopping your transfers and reestablishing your IP on the next node. Which is what you'd have to do anyway, but there is no software, or hardware for that matter, that accomplishes this seamlessly. For cellular there is, but the range on a cellular tower is incredible and data integrity is not an issue with voice.

      But it can also be about connection sharing. Create wires where there were no wires before between points of infrastructure. What if sharing the load between two lines meant flipping a switch? No finding someone to rerun wire and snake it around the datacenter to a box that probably doesn't even have another ethernet jack open. Or even between different floors and buildings. Heck, you could even share between multiple businesses in an industrial park without a wired infrastructure to tear down if deals change. Use wireless and boom, you just need an antenna and an on switch. This is where some intelligent bonding would utilize the bandwidth most effectively. By bonding all available connections together he would achieve both higher throughput and theoretically better fault tolerance.

      And to preemptively answer the obvious, companies would create a VPN and could use anonymous networks and routers without privacy fears.

      Really kind of scary if the "net" became a real web of autonomous, ad hoc wireless nodes with no underlying infrastructure. Guess we wouldn't need to miss WorldCom.

  16. community networks and the equipment are here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:community networks and the equipment are here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those wishing to start up a Community Wireless Network, or find one should seriousley consult FreeNetworks.org, or Email Adam Shand for more information.

  17. Linksys Community network are a bunch of sellouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We all know the LCWN sold their souls Saddam Hussein, so just forget it.


    Only the default community network offers Community Wireless access at speeds up to 44Mbps without messing with unratified 802.11g, our hax0red access points don't corrupt valuable RF spectrum, we sell antennas, and our FAQ doesn't suck.

  18. This is lame by RedCard · · Score: 1

    April fools day on slashdot sort of blows.

    Why don't we all just check out The Onion instead.

    It's new today, and at least it's funny.

    1. Re:This is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me the Onion should only have true stories onn April Fools Day.

  19. How Ironic by divide+overflow · · Score: 4, Funny


    Here it is, April 1, and I have 5 moderator points to use or lose. What a waste. All dressed up and nowhere to go.

    1. Re:How Ironic by divide+overflow · · Score: 1


      Jeez, I post a humorous post on a lame, bogus April Fool's topic...and someone mods my post "offtopic". Wow, talk about ironic; I just CANNOT catch a break today. Maybe I need to start writing in French.

      Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

  20. Multiple posts of the same article? The nice thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that it's always April Fools on Slashdot!

  21. a good thing by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 1

    If Joe Citizen and Jane Doe can set up a node/AP in their local neighbourhood, then we are one step closer to ubiquitous wireless access.

    It's by no means an easy task, though. And until it gets easier for most users, metro networks will be limited to the linux crowd.

    Let's hope this works out and helps people to set up APs. It will benefit us all, some day.

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
    1. Re:a good thing by toast0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      since this story is crap anyhow, i just wanted to point out that i enjoyed your .sig

  22. Language!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quote from the site: Yo, I git dat, but need info in my native language.

    And, would that language be English?

  23. Please don't send that link to my neighbor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's on Covad, I'm on SBC/PacHell. When my line is down, I can usually connect to his.

    The linksyscommunitynetwork makes for a most excellent backup connection!

  24. Portland by suky · · Score: 1
    Portland, Oregon has the Personal Telco wireless project.

    They claim Portland is the the most un-wired city in the USA.

  25. Corrected link by grimsweep · · Score: 1
    whoops.

    Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie(free registration required to listen)

    Look for the song entitled 'Behind the Scenes at Microsoft'. Wish they'd let me link the song directly... :/

  26. This is certainly coincidental! by Myself · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know where these folks got the idea for this page? I could swear they got their inspiration from FreeSky Wireless, who made their first public announcement at Rubi-Con on Saturday.

    It's obvious that both groups are very popular, since FreeSky also uses the same SSID, and all these folks must be members of both projects. It's great to see such a community-minded spirit across America!

  27. oops by soliaus · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will be until cisco changes it, just to piss some people off. ;-)

    --
    Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
  28. Re:Now seriously - yes there is a way!! by tosspot1 · · Score: 1

    What you are describing is possible! There is an open source project called "Open AP". This is a tiny linux image and runs on the access point. Problems such as load sharing multiple connections, multipoint-to-multipoint bridging etc are solved! Read this for more info and some further links: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/59/28972.html Also, there is now a smaller version of the meshbox called the meshbook - http://www.meshbook.com

  29. I always thought... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    ...that April Fools were only valid up until midday on 1st April.

    After midday, the tables are turned and the fool is the person playing the joke.

    At least it always was when I was a kid.

  30. I hate this day by TinoMNYY24 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why does slashdot think it's appropriate to post lies on national lie to people day? First of all, it stops most people from even getting on the internet for at least 24 hours (like me), but with the internet being more international these days, they can cause problems. I had to stop my chinese neighbor from frantically selling stocks TWICE today because I told him slashdot was a reputable news source. I guess I won't be making that mistake again.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:I hate this day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I won't be making that mistake again.

      Which mistake? Reading /.? Getting on the internet? Making Chinese friends? Stopping them from frantically selling stocks?

    2. Re:I hate this day by TinoMNYY24 · · Score: 1

      Telling crazy immigrants that slashdot always tells the truth. The chinese government frowns on April Fool's day, but the citizens don't quite know what it's about.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  31. My brain can't parse your ascii. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..I'm guessing that's probably a good thing though.

  32. Linksys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it is pretty funny, we did a WAP scan in Richmond BC awhile ago and found like 60 linksys WAP's.. pretty much all with default settings, we were all joking about setting the SSID's to Richmond Community Network.. but felt there could be some legal issues ;)

    out of 500 access points found, about 150 where linksys WAP's with default settings.

  33. A *New* thing? Please... by Zanthany · · Score: 1

    Slashdot needs to get over this whole idea of the newness of community networking and "How WiFi Will Save the World." Get over your DSL/cable-fed selves and wake up. Communities all across the United States are already doing this, and have been doing so for years.

    I live in a small north-central Missouri town of about 10,000 residents. What do I do for internet access? Not dialup, that's for sure.

    The local utility company is a co-op run under mandate from the city council. Its services include electric, water, sewer, trash, curbside recycling, and internet access. While they do offer dialup access, they also offer WiFi access all across town.

    The CO downtown has three T1 lines to their servers, which are then fed wirelessly to the three antennae in town, sitting atop the water towers. From the towers, end-users can access the network, usually using higher gain external antennae for better reception.

    When I moved to town, I asked the netadmin all about the network, and wondered if they were going to upgrade to 802.11g anytime soon. She said they hadn't thought about it recently, but with my limited input, they are considering the upgrade now.

    Data throughput depends on network usage and other factors like a normal network, but I average between 700-800Kbps. Not blazing speed by any stretch of the imagination, but very workable and usable.

    I realize this is probably going on in other areas of the country as well. But we on ./ are so damn concerned about the forbidden "last mile" that we tend to forget what's right under our nose for solutions. Of course it's not fiber, but the the cost-to-access ratio is much better in the long run.

    *plink plink*

  34. MOD PARENT UP! (+Funny!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, good one!

  35. The People (tm) by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 1
    It's about time somebody did something to bring Wi-Fi to the People.

    The People? Are these the same ones always gettin' shafted by The Man(tm)?

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  36. This is too stupid for words by puzzled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Looks like they've daisy chained three Linksys amplifiers in series to boost their power. These guys obviously know dick(a technical term) about wireless.

    Amplifiers accept a certain input power level, probably 30mw (+15dBm) in the case of Linksys gear, and they output a certain power level, likely 100mw (+20dBm). If you over drive the amp, you don't get any more out of it, you just shorten its life dramatically.

    On the return path side those devices usually have a low noise amplifier(LNA). Put three LNAs in series and you're going to pump up the background noise to the point where the AP sees a noise floor just as high as the signal. Typically the noise floor in an urban environment is around -90dBm and a good useable signal would be around -70dBm. Three times boosting both noise and signal by +10dB via an LNA and you get ... useless crap.

    I net these fellows have also 'hacked' their AP to put out 100mw - take a look around on the net and you'll find that you *do* get 100mw out of a hacker AP - 31mw in the channel you wanted, and 69mw of crap spattered all over 2300 - 2500 MHz.

    Linksys is a cheap, wireless LAN product. Wireless LAN was meant to be deployed indoors and that goes double for this stuff.

    If you must run 802.11b as an access product, stick with quality amps from YDI, Teletronics, or RFLinx, and use decent radios - Cisco or Lucent being the most common.

    The FCC is gonna bitch slap the entire unlicensed wireless internet business over the behavior of a few clue free dorks with shiny new BestBuy credit cards.

    God save us all ...

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:This is too stupid for words by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Um... Read the whole linked article... Especially the next-to-last FAQ answer.

      (In other words, they got you.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    2. Re:This is too stupid for words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could very well be that *he* got *you*.

    3. Re:This is too stupid for words by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      While it is possible, feigning stupidity usually isn't considered to be much of an April Fools joke. (As the world is so full of idiots, one more doesn't make a joke.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  37. fucking wifi crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try using 802.11. It doesn't sound as bad as that damn wi-fi name.

  38. You actually -CAN- do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    IF you have a HAM radio license, you can pump up to 100w (thats 100 WATTS, not milliwatts) into channels 1-6 legally.

    However, there are a few catches.

    1) Transmission over 1w requires an AutoPowerControl device, which only beams as much power as is neccessary.

    2) While non-HAM radio operators have to -put up- according to FCC reg. part 15, be considerate of the slashdotted masses. You would want to use this only as a crosslink between WAP's. Additionally, since you are camping a whole channel, you would want to use a horizontally polarized antenna, or better yet, a dish. A surplus sattelite minidish shell works great.

    3) There are other non-wifi uses for these frequencies. Channel 1 gets used by power-sensitive sattelite transmissions, and high powered blanket transmissions would hinder their work.

    4) HAM radio is also limited for non-commercial applications, and requires that you identify your transmission every 5-10 minutes. Also, there is the restriction that communications must be clear channel. The standard interpretation is that WEP encryption would be illegal for ham transmission.

    - So, for you experimenters out there, this may be an option. For you business people, sorry. For community coop's, my hunch is that there may or may not be some application.

    For more information, see www.arrl.org, or their publication QST in the April 2003 issue, page 28.

    KC7UQ0

    1. Re:You actually -CAN- do this... by telephoneman · · Score: 1

      Dpends on how much sproggy you want, and wether youre prepared to filetr G4IOP

  39. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    I woke up this morning and discovered that everything in my apartment
    had been stolen and replaced with an exact replica. I told my roommate,
    "Isn't this amazing? Everything in the apartment has been stolen and
    replaced with an exact replica." He said, "Do I know you?"
    -- Steven Wright

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...