Slashdot Mirror


Recent Macs Have Built-in USB 2.0

RalphBNumbers writes "According to a forum thread at CreateMac, a Korean Mac community, the newer MDD 1.25 and 1.42 GHz dual G4s actually use a NEC PD720101 USB 2.0 controller for their built-in USB. Apple's drivers only support USB 1.x, but you can apparently enable USB 2.0 functionality by using the drivers for a USB 2.0 card from Orange Micro that uses the same NEC controller. YMMV." Is there a translation of any of this, somewhere?

86 comments

  1. About time... by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

    It's about time the Macs support USB 2.0. Both my external 200 GB hard drive and my external DVD+RW use USB 2.0 and I have been putting off getting a Mac because of it. Now that I know I can hook these up to a Mac, maybe I'll think about it....

    1. Re:About time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um. Duh. Take the 200 GB drive out of its case and put it inside the Mac. You've got four internal ATA slots.

      And use the DVD-RW in the Power Mac instead of a POS external DVD+RW.

      Excuses, excuses.

    2. Re:About time... by myov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the device fall back to USB 1 speeds in that case?

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    3. Re:About time... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Interesting. All my external stuff is firewire, in fact, I purchased a Sound Blast Audigy so I could use them with my PC.

      As far as I am concerned USB is for mice, keyboards, and the like. Firewire is for hard drives, burners, etc.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    4. Re:About time... by galaxy300 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thinking back to a year ago, I wish I had bought a firewire ext. hard drive, but it seemed like the PC Cards for USB 2.0 were cheaper. I have a laptop and my options for expansion were fairly limited -- I think I liked the fact that I could just bring my hard drive to work and plug it in to my USB port and pull everything off of it. Now I have an iPod and I have all the firewire ports so a firewire drive would have made sense...

      All of my USB 2.0 devices have worked great, though and at a pretty decent speed -- no problems there.

    5. Re:About time... by galaxy300 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah that works for an iMac, right? Oh yeah, no it doesn't. Not a lot of room internally for extra drives, eh?

    6. Re:About time... by galaxy300 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that would work very well for burning DVDs, and moving large files around would be just painful. I actually like the USB 2.0 card I've put in my laptop -- I know moving to firewire would be nice, but I'm just not crazy about the upgrade expense...

    7. Re:About time... by myov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I should have mentioned that in my comment. I find even firewire hard drives slow, so USB1 must be painful. A USB 1 dvd burner? Forget it. My usb1 cd burner takes 15 min to burn, and that's only for 640MB, not a 4 Gig disc.

      But IIRC, the entire USB tree drops down to USB1 speeds if even a single USB1 device is used. So you may not be getting the speed you expect either.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    8. Re:About time... by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Probably true -- just like the old SCSI days...

      Luckily, I only have 2 USB 2.0 devices, and they're both plugged directly into my 2.0 card. All of my USB 1.1 devices (printer, mouse, card reader) are plugged into an old USB hub that's plugged into the USB 1.1 port on my laptop. I can't wait until the day when all of those peripherals are all running on bluetooth or some other wireless protocol...

    9. Re:About time... by danielsmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you can't add another drive, but you can replace the one that comes installed. Swap that one for your 200GB, and put the small one in your USB case. It will work if the 200GB drive is bootable. I replaced my iMac's 6GB drive with a 120GB one, and it worked fine.

    10. Re:About time... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 works fine, except all devices downstream from a hub have to work at the same speed. This means: You need to buy a hub to put your keyboard, mouse, printer, digital camera, memory card readers, etc on so that your other devices can take advantage of USB 2.0's speed, and then only half of it, if I recall the spec.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  2. Translation by The+J+Kid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a translation..[clicky].

    But there isn't really much text anyway....

    Rejoice Rejoice ! One time where you don't have to RTFA ! WooHoo!

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    1. Re:Translation by xWeston · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is a link that works for translation..

      Babelfish Korean->English Translation of article

      Rejoice Rejoice! One time where you have to CTFP (Check the F Preview). WooHoo!

    2. Re:Translation by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Rejoice Rejoice! One time where I'm too stupid to know the differance between Korean and Japanese. WooHoo!

      OK. You got me...*hides face in shame*

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  3. Translation fun by yomegaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used BabelFish to translate it and here is how the title came out:

    Power in Mac the up-to-date USB 2.0 internal organs?

    It's alive!

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    1. Re:Translation fun by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, that's whacked. Sounds like the title or subtitle of some kind of anime or something.

      --Dan

    2. Re:Translation fun by djward · · Score: 1
      And wheezing!

      This chip in high position 2 emphysema

  4. USB Secrecy by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of manufacturers, including Apple, seem pretty pretty close-mouthed on the 1.1/2.0 issue. I don't recall ever seeing an ad for a complete system that specified which version of USB the system supports. I guess everbody has an inventory of motherboards with built-in USB 1.1 that they need to use up. Not that big a deal if you've got an extra PCI slot for a $20 USB 2.0 card. But what if you have an iMac or some other system with no "legacy" ports or slots?

    1. Re:USB Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      A lot of manufacturers, including Apple, seem pretty pretty close-mouthed on the 1.1/2.0 issue

      No.

      Apple has always stated that you get USB 1.1 performance from their USB ports. If you want higher-speed, you use Firewire.

      The fact that newer machines "may" have a 2.0 compatible controller is likely due more to that's what's easily available from the semiconductor manufacturers. Apple has not been selling those as 2.0 compatible, so the drivers do not support using them in 2.0 mode. It's that simple.

      What? You can hack a driver to enable the 2.0 performance? Well, that's just great, good for you. Apple didn't sell it that way though, so it's not like you paid for a 2.0 system, and it's not like they owe you anything.

      Given the amount of whinging in the mac crowd. I bet if Apple put out a Software Update tonight that enabled full 2.0 in all those systems with a 2.0 chip they'd actually get more complaints than praise, from people who feel 'cheated' that they didn't get 2.0 with their system (even though it was neither advertised nor did they pay for it).

    2. Re:USB Secrecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you cared about having slots, you wouldn't have bought an iMac. That's like asking what you do if you have a PS2 and want to get USB 2.0 for it.

  5. USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Hi+Larry! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My guess is apple don't support usb 2 because it would kill firewire 800, a standard that doesn't seem to be adopted by many manufacturer yet.

    1. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since FireWire 800 is twice as fast as USB 2.0, it's hard to see a threat there.

    2. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      five times as expensive too

    3. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by seinman · · Score: 1

      Since Beta is so much better than VHS, it's hard to see a threat there.

    4. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that logic is that it's like comparing SCSI to a parrallel port.

      Everybody, say it with me now, USB and Firewire do not compete with one another. Sure, there's some overlap, but when I've got a massive amount of data I want to move quickly, I'm gonna use Firewire. Even Firewire 1 has better SUSTAINED data rates than USB 2. When I want to connect a new mouse or joystick without having to dance around drivers and IRQ conflicts, I'll use USB.

      USB is really great for connecting peripherals like my camera, keyboard, color correction module, printer. Firewire is great for connecting hard drives, DVD burners, my iPod and a DV cam. Use the right tool for the job.

      With that said, it's good to see Apple stepping up and finally supporting the increased thoroughput available to USB 2. Prosumer electronics are going to continue to standardize on USB 2, while professionals will continue to use Firewire and Firewire 2, so it's good to see them adjusting with the market.

    5. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Ravendon · · Score: 0
      "Since FireWire 800 is twice as fast as USB 2.0, it's hard to see a threat there."

      Firewire 800 is NOT twice as fast as USB 2.0.
      USB 2.0's rated speed is 480 Mbps.
      The rated speed of Firewire 800 is 800 Mbps.
      For Firewire to be twice as fast as USB 2.0, you will just have to wait until Firewire 960 comes out.

    6. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Try doing some real-world benchmarks.

    7. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by The+Herbaliser · · Score: 1

      I read a while ago, i think in macworld, that firewire2 has the potential to go well beyond 800Mbps (I think the spec allowed speeds up to something like 2Gbps, but apple just decided there wasn't the need), and can also potentially support distances of up to 100m. Can someone who knows what they're talking about confirm/deny/correct this?

    8. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB 2.0 is 480Mbps peak.

      FireWire 800 is 800Mbps sustained.

      More Intel marketing crud.

    9. Re:USB 2 Treat Firewire 800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using that "logic" it's hard to see why all the digital camera manufacturers use regular Firewire. They will go to Firewire 800 as fast as they can. Firewire can go even faster than 800 whereas USB 2.0 is as fast as USB will ever go.

  6. Re:Who cares? by thedbp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those prices aren't exactly stellar. That's without any of the fancy user-apps that Apple includes that make life a whole lot easier. That's also without the more durable and attractive construction. Nor does it include a Unix-based operating system that can also run x86 operating systems. Nor does it include FireWire. And the Wi-Fi option would take up the PC Card slot as opposed to being an internal upgrade.

    So if you add up all the stuff you'd have to add to the Dell to make it comparable to the Mac, the Mac winds up being a better value, especially over time as Apple's OS updates generally make things FASTER and MORE STABLE as opposed to SLOWER and REPLETE WITH BUGS.

  7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, yeah, and if you're a corporate buyer you're sure as hell can get on-site support at your location for those Apple boxes, as well as the second source in case Apple goes out of business or discontinues the line.

  8. Re:Who cares? by brandonlp · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's without any of the fancy user-apps that Apple includes that make life a whole lot easier.

    Huh? Ever heard of Microsoft Windows XP? What exactly will I be missing in a Windows XP box that I would get in Apple?

    What will you be missing in XP that you get with a mac? iTunes, iMovie, iDVD, iPhoto... iLife, if you wanna call it that. Four included apps that allow you to do some pretty nifty things with audio, video, and photos. XP ships with Windows Movie Maker and Windows Media Player which would cover video and audio... but they're not designed to work well together, so they don't, and that still leaves out photo and good DVD creation software.

  9. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly will I be missing in a Windows XP box that I would get in Apple?

    A user-friendly OS.

  10. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Please point to the research that claims that Apple notebooks generally last longer and work better than their Dell counterparts?

    No such research is necessary. It's self-evident. Go do a hands-on comparison between a Dell Whatever and a PowerBook. Draw your own conclusion.

    And downloading a Unix-based system, partitioning the HDD and getting a dual-boot or just trashing Windows XP and installing Linux on the laptop is non-existing in x86 world.

    There goes your ease of use parity, huh?

    Because it's basic configuration. It would be available as add-on.

    An add-on how? This is a laptop we're talking about, yes? That means you can have FireWire or wireless networking, but not both at the same time.

    Also, how crucial is that PCMCIA slot in the first place?

    Since you're advocating putting lots and lots of stuff in it, I'd say damn crucial.

    Bottom line: if you want to go the cheap-ass route, be my guest. If you want to buy a laptop that will last you for the next three or four years, buy a PowerBook.

  11. USB 2.0 controller and Macs by Tycho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those Macs do have a USB 2.0 controller, but it doesn't really matter. I read the technical documentation for the NEC uPD7020101, which is the controller used in those Macs. The USB 2.0 portion of the controller is trivial to disable and yet still leave the USB 1.1 portion functional. It is also possible to make the USB 2.0 portion permanently disabled in hardware or disabled in hardware, but possible to enable with a hardware hack. Or for that matter disabled, but possible to enable with a new system BIOS or a new driver. Any of these are possible. Anyone care to guess which one is the case? Knowing Apple any could be the case.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    1. Re:USB 2.0 controller and Macs by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Apple's KeyLargo south bridge already has several USB 1.1 controllers, so why would Apple use the NEC chip and permanently disable the 2.0 functionality?

      Honestly, none of the possibilities make much sense to me.

    2. Re:USB 2.0 controller and Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's likely that they used the IC because they are going to adopt USB 2.0 at some point, most likely in another revision of the current. It's not being used to its full advantage in the current models, but a later model might take advantage of it...since the later model might use a similar motherboard, they've designed 2.0 into the motherboard ahead of time?

    3. Re:USB 2.0 controller and Macs by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I read the technical documentation for the NEC uPD7020101

      Yeah, but you forgot to read the article summary. :)

      Anyone care to guess which one is the case?

      Yes, it's fully functional - you can turn USB 2 on with the Orange Micro drivers.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:USB 2.0 controller and Macs by Tycho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but have never heard of any direct quote from anyone who speaks english that these drivers work. The only links to that I have seen are to a Korean forum that have been translated by babelfish. The accuracy of the translation is not perfect so it cannot be relied on. The only direct quotes from english speakers that I have seen say that these drivers do not work.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    5. Re:USB 2.0 controller and Macs by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      As a US citizen I want the same rights as Iraqi citizens have now. Like the right to loot or to kill who I please.

      All these buildings are yours-- except the Ministry of Oil. Attempt no lootings there.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  12. I'm getting a bit tired of this by hprotagonist0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Powerbook's got a DVD-R drive that apparently could be a 2X writer and support DVD-RW, but Apple's drivers only support 1X writing and no RW whatsoever. Now this. Why does Apple deliberately cripple its hardware?

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." --Voltaire
    1. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Why not be happy with one of the best looking and best performing laptops that has a DVD burner?

      The optical drive is connected to the IDE bus anyway, so whether the PB had USB 2.0 or not, it wouldn't affect the DVD-R.

    2. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the powermacs got an update to increase their speed performance to allow for the new higher speed media, and they may follow suit with that with the powerbooks as well.

      i would also say that you should not expect much of an optical drive in a laptop. i imagine that it would be pretty system intensive to burn a dvd at 2x on a powerbook and would get mighty hot anyway.

      apple really does not cripple their hardware so much as not allow for poor support of it. no dvd support at all until 10.1, so why expect them to have support that they feel is satisfactory on a relatively new concept? apple does a great deal of tech support and i think that they are best to not release anything unstable to save their already busy support people when it can all be avoided by quality products.

    3. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by Pfhor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the firmware update was to correct an issue with the dvd drives, that would cause them to break when a higher rated media (4x) was put in the drive, it still only burns at 2x, it just won't implode on itself when you put a 4x blank in it.

    4. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by suyashs · · Score: 1

      Err....all the SuperDrives have supported DVD-RW...just pop in a disc and it appears on the desktop! The only thing is that iDVD doesn't support DVD-RW; but DVD Studio Pro does! So if you want DVD-RW Video support, purchase DVD Studio Pro.

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    5. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by heXXXen · · Score: 1

      "allow for the new higher speed media" apparently everyone was sleeping when Pioneer released this update for their DVR-10x series (the superdrive is just a dvr-104/a04). 4x media would potentially damage the drive, it doesnt speed the drive up and it shouldnt even be considered an "improvement", it's a bug fix, and a rather nasty bug it was.

    6. Re:I'm getting a bit tired of this by Tug3 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the speed issue on the PowerBook, but the RW is no problem. Sure you cannot use RWs from OS directly, but you can use them with Toast. Of course you have to buy one, but compared to the price of the laptop...

      I fount this to be true with my desktop (with the Pioneer DVD-RW). I'm not sure about the DVD burning speed, as I don't burn DVDs that often that it would make any real difference.

      Anyway I wouldn't complain, you got a beautiful piece of engineering on your lap...

      --
      If all else fails, pull the plug and get out...
      The Life is out there...
  13. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No such research is necessary. It's self-evident. Go do a hands-on comparison between a Dell Whatever and a PowerBook. Draw your own conclusion.

    PowerBook is neat-looking and all, but so what? Dells aren't butt-ugly for sure, so it's not like Apple products would turn my life into a paradise, and Dells would cause just pain and suffering.

    There goes your ease of use parity, huh?

    Well, if you need it, you can get it. Can I install Red Hat Linux 9 on an Apple box easily and with a nice point-and-click GUI interface?

    An add-on how? This is a laptop we're talking about, yes? That means you can have FireWire or wireless networking, but not both at the same time.

    Huh? It's an add-on as you buy it, go through Dell's site, choose 'Customize' for any option you would like to add, and they will have it built in. I don't see how the option of FireWire excludes wireless networking, or DVD-ROM for that matter.

    Since you're advocating putting lots and lots of stuff in it, I'd say damn crucial.

    Not really, most of the peripheral nowadays go with the USB port. I've got my Sharp Zaurus, an HP PhotoSmart digital camera, and my Rio MP3 player. All use USB connection. Now, Dell usually ships their stuff with 1-2 USB ports, but a $15 hub from Linksys usually fixes that problem. I haven't bought any hardware with PCMCIA capability and without USB capability, the only one I can remember that requires using PCMCIA more or less often is the CompactFlash->PCMCIA converter.

    Now, between Zaurus, PhotoSmart and RIO, how many I can easily connect to a Mac laptop, have syncronized and working?

  14. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leaves out photo and good DVD creation software.

    Huh? Microsoft PictureIt seems to ship with every XP box that I can remember. Also, yeah, you're right, scarcity for graphic applications for Windows is a well-known trouble, which made even Adobe claim they're moving into Wintel camp.

    And there are absolutely no DVD creation applications for Windows either (hint: they're usually shipped with DVD-RW, not OS, as they're supposed to).

  15. Re:Who cares? by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 1

    if you think that is bad, try to configure a dell server that competes with the XServe, you end up thinking those are pretty reasonable too, amazingly enough. the 4u dell with all the bells and whistles twibbed to match the ultimate XServe ends up scarily almost twice as much.

  16. Not true by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...the 2.0 chip isn't wired. Apple, like other OEM'simply bought boards with dual capability, since 1.0 only boards are no longer available in the quantities that Apple needs at this time. It takes another step to enable 2.0 circuitry, and that step has not been taken by Apple at this time.

    The 2.0 drivers are already in the OS, so anyone that thinks they can buy a new Mac, add drivers, and have 2.0 is a bit of a chump.

  17. 1394b is a lot more than "FireWire 800" by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative
    IEEE-1394b can support speeds of 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 Mbps, and can support the following media (not all speeds supported on all media):
    • 9-pin twisted pair copper (standard for FireWire 800)

    • Standard CAT-5
      Step-index plastic fiber
      Hard polymer-clad plastic fiber
      Glass fiber
    Apple also has an interesting and informative FireWire 800/IEEE-1394b tech brief

    Also, to the person who responded saying FireWire 800 isn't twice as fast as USB 2 because USB 2 operates at 480 Mbps: you should look at the real life performance of USB - both 1 and 2. It's far short of the theoretical maximum; in the case of USB 2, often well under 400 Mbps. So FireWire 800 is more than twice as fast. Even 400 Mbps FireWire is often faster than USB 2.

    However, it's really beside the point if FireWire 800 is faster than USB 2 if the device you wish to connect only has a USB 2 interface. FireWire may be the superior interface and technology for many high-speed tasks, but many consumer devices feature USB 2. It certainly can't hurt to be able to connect to the widest variety of devices possible. FireWire - not only because of speed, but because of features and the flexibility of the standard - will continue to be chosen for high end audio, video, specialty storage and networking, smart home interconnectivity, etc. Look at plasma HDTVs and DVD-A players: you won't see USB 2 on those. But it would be nice for Mac users to pick up a third-party USB 2 scanner, DVD recorder, camera, etc., and be able to take full advantage of the peripheral's connectivity (many of these devices may even have FireWire versions, or versions with both USB 2 and FireWire. But the item in stock and on the shelf at Best Buy always seems to be the USB 2-only version...that's what it really comes down to for some).
    1. Re:1394b is a lot more than "FireWire 800" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when my dad bought a DV camera last year, I was worried because it was labled as USB 2. Not knowing that there are different kinds of USB, he suggested that I just try to use it in iMovie. However, after plugging the included USB cable into the back of my powerbook, I noticed that the USB 2 DV camera did not connect to the included cable. It turns out that they put a firewire camera in a USB box, and it seems to work fine once we got a firewire cable.

  18. Re:Who cares? by dadragon · · Score: 1

    Well, if you need it, you can get it. Can I install Red Hat Linux 9 on an Apple box easily and with a nice point-and-click GUI interface?

    Red Hat, no. But you can use YellowDog or Mandrake, nice and easy.

    Now, between Zaurus, PhotoSmart and RIO, how many I can easily connect to a Mac laptop, have syncronized and working?

    Don't know about the Zaurus, but the other two work quite nicely. If the Zaurus doesn't work now, it will soon. There is a large open source community surrounding Mac OS X.

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  19. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Resume: None of the items you described are worth overpaying $400-500 for similar Apple item. That's leaving out the fact that for most of the users none of the problems above are really a problem in the first place.


    Hey, that's fine. You don't need the firewire, the Wi-Fi, and all those usefull apps then you should certainly be able to get a lower priced product that suits your needs. You spend your money on a system that has a high FPS (frame per...) and I'll spend mine on one that Just Works, Does More, and yet Just Has A Lower Cost Of Ownership Anyway.

  20. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This pseudo-hack doesn't work for the iMac. It's for the current Power Macs.

    Can't you read?

    1. Re:Err... by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      can't YOU read? the pseudo hack does not work on the imac, however the guy was saying put the hard drive directly in the mac making the hack irrelivant. sure they did not take the imac into account, but neither solution would work for it.

  21. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a DMCA violation and could land you in jail.

  22. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That probably explains Apple's non-existant market share on the server market.

    Ok, folks, I am done trolling for the day. Off to watch Saturday Night Live with my girlfriend.\

  23. Driver available by Halo1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MacNN's got a story with a link to unofficial drivers that enable the USB 2.0 functionality. Some comments there indicate they really work, though I can't verify this myself (I have neither an MDD G4 nor any USB2 devices)

    --
    Donate free food here
  24. OT look at kill by davesag · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    As a US citizen I want the same rights as Iraqi citizens have now. Like the right to loot or to kill who I please.

    If you want to go to Iraq I believe you'll find your govt does grant you those 'additonal rights'. You are simply discouraged from doing it at home. Of course your govt also reserves the right to kill you - at home or abroad. Lucky you eh.

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    1. Re:OT look at kill by Tycho · · Score: 1

      This sig was pointed more at the people who were claiming after the fall of Baghdad that now Iraqi citizens had the rights that people in the US have. To me at least most Iraqis currently don't have access to basic human needs like the right to safety or access clean water. Things will certainly become better as time passes. But that is a ways off for the Iraqi people.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  25. (lost in) Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This chip high position 2 emphysema

    That's beautiful!

  26. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PowerBook is neat-looking and all, but so what?

    You missed the point. It's not whether they're attractive or not, though they certainly are. It's the fact that PowerBooks are better built than other laptops, which makes them more durable.

    Well, if you need it, you can get it.

    Again, with missing the point. A PowerBook has a user-friendly UNIX operating system on it; it's there as soon as you open the box. In order to put UNIX on your Dell Whatever, you have to go find an operating system you like and then make boot disks or something and then repartition the whatever to load the thing on the... see? It's a pain in the ass. You simply don't have to do that with a Mac. It's unnecessary.

    Can I install Red Hat Linux 9 on an Apple box easily and with a nice point-and-click GUI interface?

    Well, apart from the fact that doing so would be like ripping the leather interior out of a Mercedes and replacing it with naugahyde, yes, you can. Red Hat has a PowerPC version, right? I would imagine they do. If they don't, there are plenty of other Linux distributions for PowerPC, all of which can easily be installed on a Mac. But the easiest and best thing to do, of course, is to buy Virtual PC-- the version that comes without Windows is something like $99-- and run Linux through that. That way you can use all the IA-32 software out there on your Mac.

    But let me repeat: doing so would be colossally stupid.

    It's an add-on as you buy it, go through Dell's site, choose 'Customize' for any option you would like to add, and they will have it built in.

    That's funny. I can't seem to find the 802.11g option, or the FireWire 800 option. Can you point them out for me?

    Now, Dell usually ships their stuff with 1-2 USB ports, but a $15 hub from Linksys usually fixes that problem.

    Yes, because we all know how important it is for all of your peripherals to be plugged into your laptop all at once. Wow. You really do live in an entirely different world, doncha?

    Now, between Zaurus, PhotoSmart and RIO, how many I can easily connect to a Mac laptop, have syncronized and working?

    All of 'em. It's too bad you decided to cheap out, though. Every one of those peripherals is a piece of shit. Get rid of the Zaurus and buy yourself a T68i; it replaces your PDA quite admirably. I like Nikon for inexpensive digital cameras. And Rio? Give me a break. Shoulda bought an iPod. And now, as expected, you're advocating a cheap-ass Dell over a PowerBook. Man, your priorities are just all messed up, aren't they?

  27. "Is this copy of XP legal?" by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    That menu option in the Windows XP help menu is enough to make my Mac worth it regardless of any other considerations. The message is "we think you're a criminal".

    There are no such things in Mac OS X.

    Oh yeah, and my iBook is the most rugged, best value piece of hardware I've ever bought. There just isn't anything to touch it in the PC laptop world, and I've taken apart my fair share of PC laptops (usually to repair them). The build quality just isn't there. Perhaps with the IBM Thinkpads, but they are still a class below the iBook and Powerbook.

    Go and get your hands on an iBook and you'll see what I mean. There's no creaking when you pick it up for one thing, and it doesn't feel like a tacky ABS plastic chassis (probably because it isn't - it's a mixture of polycarbonate and magnesium/aluminium alloy).

    From OS X I can manage my FreeBSD box from the terminal while working on an Office document (yes, yes, I had to get Office v.X for work purposes). I can run X11, Virtual PC (if I wanted to - I have no need since I have a w2k box as well). iTunes is far and away the best mp3 software player I have ever used.

    There's just no comparison. I've used PC laptops and I'm always disappointed in them. Even new, expensive ones. I always feel content when I get back to my "slow, expensive" iBook. It's priceless to me.

    1. Re:"Is this copy of XP legal?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree 100%, my iBook is priceless to me as well. It proforms well,gives me my unix base that I want/need, and is easy to use. It is also quiet, unlike these modern pc laptops that sound like a 747. And above all that, the iBook will keep it's value quite well, as most apple hardware does.

  28. Re:Who cares? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    The Rio mp3 player most definitely works with OS X. My friend has one, and a Dual 450 G4 tower running 10.2.3 - you connect it to a USB port and it shows up in iTunes staight away just like the iPod. Obviously you can only transfer at usb speeds, not the firewire speed of the iPod, but it does work.

    It even shows a little window at to bottom of the playlist when you have it connected showing you how much space you have available.

    I don't have experience with the other devices, so I can't comment.

  29. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you miss the point of the parent post?

    Are you being sarcastic?

    Or are you not through trolling after all?

    p.s. You don't have a girlfriend.

  30. Re:Who cares? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    It seems to be a bogus argument. Please point to the research that claims that Apple notebooks generally last longer and work better than their Dell counterparts?


    You've never use a dell have you?
    1) Shit inside keeps breaking. Dell will fix that as long as it's under warraanty, but it's still a nuiscance to be w/out your com for 3 weeks. Not to menation if you keep it pas warranty.
    2) They ar the shittiest built laptops out there. i've use new Compaqs that are better built. And the dell screen sags ointo the kb so you get key prints on the screen.

    A better comparison would have been to sonys ot ibms.

  31. Babelfish Translations ... by Three+Letter+Acronym · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, mind you, I've seen some pretty bad translations from babelfish, but read this one poster's thoughts: ccep ~ Only one day inquiry possibility 1,000 times it goes over, ni the imagining outside it won and the bedspread which is not the minute when bay anyone it does as a favor the answer writing... Right ing ~ nem it does, the bedspreads ~~~ I honestly had tears in my eyes from laughter for a good five minutes. But maybe that's just me.

    --
    "Freedom is letting people do things that you don't like." -Linus Torvalds
  32. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll spend mine on one that Just Works, Does More, and yet Just Has A Lower Cost Of Ownership Anyway.

    Just works - Any system setup, configured properly will just work, just as well.

    Does More - Runs more apps? Is faster? No on both. So probably doesn't do more.

    yet Just Has A Lower Cost Of Ownership Anyway - Since your Mac cost more to buy than my PC will cost throughout its entire life, I find this doubtful.

  33. Re:Who cares? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Erm, Apple does provide on site support for corporations.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  34. The Orange Drivers Do *NOT* Activate USB 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least the drivers didn't work any magic in my hands. I installed the Orange 3.1 drivers for Jaguar, rebooted, and tested the read rate on a dual fireware400/usb2 drive connected to a PM1.42 GHz running 10.2.5. The drive is peppy over firewire (30 MB/sec) but a regular slug over USB (830 KB/sec).

  35. Easter Bunny, Dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just saw some sad news on CNN - popular childrens' figure Easter Bunny was found dead on a Georgia road this evening. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  36. Re:Who cares? by idsofmarch · · Score: 0

    What? Someone else makes computers? Oh. My. God. I can't believe it. Thank you for pointing that out, thank you from saving me from buying another (shudder) Apple. Thank you Anonymous Cowards for showing me the true path of righteousness and thrift. Now please shut the hell up until you have something interesting to say.

    --
    Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
  37. Re:Who cares? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Saw a 15 in. iMac at Microcenter in Cambridge for $899 yesterday.

  38. Re:Who cares? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Huh? Ever heard of Microsoft Windows XP? What exactly will I be missing in a Windows XP box that I would get in Apple?

    Apple's drivers. Plug things in and they work. I spend about 1/2 of my time on each, and take my word for it, since Apple has a limited pool of hardware to be compatible with, Apple's support of that hardware is much cleaner.

  39. I want a Firewire scanner... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Another thing that is bugging me on migrating over to OS X from a PC environment is the lack of decent scanners for the Mac. Most Firewire based scanners are $399 and up. HP doesn't make any of their decent consumer grade scanners with Firewire ports. It ceases to amaze me since a good majority of HP consumer PC's have Firewire ports. Instead, they just offer USB 2.0. I don't want to use USB 2.0; USB is too processor-intense. I'm not even asking for Firewire800 support, just plain-and-simple IEEE1394a. And HP doesn't even have a good excuse. What does Firewire licensing cost per port, 25 cents? On a $130 scanner that probably costs less than $20 to manufacture? The retail markup is $30 at best. Do the math. And in my case, it is inmaterial whether Apple offers USB 2.0 support, I want a decent Firewire scanner. Quit being so cheap, HP, and make a decent product! And while I'm at it, I'd like to see drives use internal Firewire ports. Why should a CD/DVD drive use Serial ATA? Leave Serial ATA for the hard drives on their own dedicated channels.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*