Slashdot Mirror


DSL Hardware for Wiring Condos?

Condo-Netwerk asks: "I'm trying to prepare a proposal for my condo building to be our own DSL provider. With 160 units, we should be able to get a T1 and keep the price fairly low. But what's the up-front cost? Which hardware should we use? What do we need to know about Copper Mountain, Avidia, etc. to do our due diligence prior to selecting hardware? I'm also helping a friend spec cabling for a new 30-unit condo building he's putting up; he wants to pull cat5 and split a DSL line from the phone room to each unit. Caveats? Experiences? Is it better to use cat6 or fiber?"

27 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Why DSL? by jackjumper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Go wireless!

    1. Re:Why DSL? by raider_red · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd agree with this comment. With DSL, you'd basically need to set up a telephone switching office on sight. As an alternative, you can set up an all ethernet system where everything is connected via router to the T1 line, or you can set up several wireless access points and hook them up to the same router, and save a lot of trouble running a CAT5 cable to every unit.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    2. Re:Why DSL? by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously. Wireless or wired ethernet... why add in the complexity of the DSL hardware?

      Unless you absolutely need to use the existing copper or something - in which case a DSL solution would work nicely... ...but since you're able to run wire - go with 100Mbps ethernet to each unit... and if you have to control access do it with a patch panel... ;)

    3. Re:Why DSL? by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would have agreed with this comment until a few weeks ago until I found out.

      - It is probably cheaper to go wired when you are in an apartment block or building a new housing development.
      - Wireless sucks when you have a lot of people on it. (Cebit this year was a mess).

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    4. Re:Why DSL? by jdray · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depending on the layout of the units, cable length may or may not be an issue. With 10/100 Ethernet, the max cable length is around 100m. I seem to remember that restricting the speed to 10 Mbit triples the max cable length, but that bit of data is suspect.

      Most commercial buildings have a wiring closet on each floor that houses switches for that floor. The switches from each floor are connected to a central (REALLY FAST) switch that typically has all the routing rules on it. Routers for Internet and other network connections are also connected in here, giving everyone on the whole network access (per permissions) to "the world."

      If your condos are distributed widely, I'd keep considering DSL but try and figure out a way to go with Ethernet. I'd avoid wireless for the time being, but consider other technologies like IP over power lines.

      There are other posts below that detail other considerations to be made when providing your own network service, such as developing a TOS and all that's encumbered there.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  2. My advice by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's my advice, for what it is worth:

    1) Don't put DSL to each unit - pull CAT-5 and run Ethernet. Your residents will have a much easier time getting hardware than with DSL, and your costs will be less.
    2) Pull the wire to a common router closet.
    3) One port per unit
    4) Lock down the ports that aren't being used.
    5) Use DHCP to assign addresses.
    6) Set up your own caching server. I would recommend using Squid.
    7) Force all outbound port 25 (SMTP) through your mail server.
    8) Run a virus scanner on your mail server. Scan all incoming AND outgoing mail.
    9) Don't route the Microsoft file sharing ports or Apple Rendezvous ports between units.
    10) Insist customers keep their machines virus free. Disconnect any who don't IMMEDIATELY.
    11) Write into your rental contracts that you ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE for maintaining your customer's machines or security - if they are scared let them run their own firewall.
    12) Offer your own space, accessible to your users, with virus scanner updates, MS patches, and so on. Encourage them to use that to save bandwidth.
    13) Routinely sniff around for WAPs. Handle them as you see fit - disconnect, or verify they are set up sanely. Don't ignore them.

    Many will disagree with some of my points (esp. 7 and 9). Ask yourself this: do I enjoy being blacklisted for spamming?

    1. Re:My advice by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 5, Funny

      Additionally, be prepared to deal with "concerned parents" asking you to police their children activity over the net.

  3. Caches. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Make sure you add a squid cache at the head end, you wouldn't want all your bandwidth being used up by constant goatse.cx reloads.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. hmmm by fjordboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, at the camp I work at, they're building a big new building and wiring it all for internet access. My first response would be go wireless, but since that isn 't always feasible, I'd just say go the simple and tried and true route w/ cat 5. I mean...come on, can you go wrong with cat5?

  5. Does everyone want it? by Rumbler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously - that's the first thing that came to mind.

    If only 25% of people in your complex want the service, depending on which provider you're getting with, installation and continued service could be a shaky proposition.

    --
    Sig master! Sig master! Sig... faster?!
    1. Re:Does everyone want it? by DDX_2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, if it's a condo, unless 50% (or whatever your condo bylaws say) of the people at the meeting vote for it, it ain't happening in the first place.

      Man, I wouldn't trust a condo board with something like providing me internet connectivity for love nor money... I don't feel like putting network issues up for a popular vote or trusting the condo board to "get it" when it's time to allocate funds for equipment, maintenance, etc. Unless you're going to hire somebody to maintain it, or get yourself a contract, do you really want to be the free tech support guy for *160* users who know where you live.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
  6. Bandwidth sharing by isomeme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on the likely residents, I'd be a bit worried about sharing a T1 (1.5 Mbps) between 160 units. Even if you figure that at peak only 10% of the units are doing bandwidth-hungry operations (media streaming, large file downloads), that still leaves only around 100 kbps per unit, which is pretty bad. If 20% try for 'heavy' access at once, they'd be better off using dialup. In other words, 30 teenage kids or similarly high-bandwidth users could crater your entire scheme.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  7. I looked at this about a year ago... by eric2hill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The costs involved with the hardware (tut systems) was pretty substantial. The owner of the property whent ahead with a MUCH simpler plan (I recommended) of putting a simple 24-port switch in the basement of each dwelling (24 room units) and daisy-chaining the switches together with 100MB fiber. We had to run CAT5 to each unit, but the costs of that (less than $100/drop) were cheaper than a TUT Systems client device (around $165) for each unit. In the end, we had one switch plugged into an upstream carrier. Turning on or off the units' internet access was as easy as telnetting to the switch and shutting down the port.

    The 100MB was MORE than enough for the 1.5MB internet pipe, and as an added bonus the dwellings could game with each other on a true 100MB LAN!

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
  8. Why not run ethernet? by danielgast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DSL was invented to provide a solution to a single specific problem (lack of quantity and quality of copper for long distance runs from the CO to the home). DSL makes some tradeoffs, including very expensive hardware, in most cases low upstream, and in many cases interference in the audio portion of the line that has to be filtered at each extension. If you're wiring an apartment or even a small neighborhood, why not consider pulling a second cat5/6 and providing regular 100mbit ethernet? Your cost dissolves down to a managed switch (and that can be eliminated if you're willing to manually plug/unplug ports from the switch), and the customer end becomes whatever cheap ethernet card they'd have to have anyway to plug the DSL modem in. For the fortune you save in DSLAMs and other expensive telco grade hardware you could probably buy everyone who posts a comment in this article a pizza.

    -Dan

  9. Wiring for Ether Expensive by shylock0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    If I understand the original post, wiring for ethernet, at least in his 160 condo set-up, would be extremely expensive: depending on the geographical distribution of the condos, installing Ethernet could be on the scale of hundreds of thousands of dollars. I recently helped consult with a University who wanted to upgrade all two dorms from 10bT to 100bT, and rewire with Cat5e. Just rewiring -- conduits already dug and easily accessible, mind you -- was going to cost them $50,000-$80,000 for two hundred dorm rooms.

    Anyway, the advantages of DSL should be obvious: no new cable needs to be laid. You can just install the DSL equipment at the central phone switch of the condos, and then give each resident a DSL modem. Much simpler, much cheaper.

    But I agree -- a T1 isn't going to cut it for 160 heavy users. If you only expect moderate use, you might be able to squeak by. I'd combine multiple T1s (better redundency) or spring for a T3 (nominally cheaper per megabit). The choice is yours.

    -Shylock

    --
    Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
  10. Let someone in the business do it by jj_johny · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I researched this for a business proposal and found out that there were already a bunch of companies in my area that do this type of work. Although you might find it fun, interesting and cheaper, it will quickly escalate into lots of crap and no payback for you. Yeah, everyone else will be happy but you will be left with a lot of headaches and renewed respect for the phone company - imagine that. Yeah find a little ISP who wants to do it and don't get yourself in the thankless position of getting screwed by your neighbors.

    As for what I would do, don't go DSL unless you have to. DSL is only needed if you are really going over the limit of Ethernet and you want the rate limitiing built into most DSL boxes. It ain't like slapping in a Cisco router or your linux router in there.

    The sizing should be in the 20 to 40 users per T1 and then you have to do load balancing between them - more fun and games.

    And for your friend who is cabling his building project, he should put both CAT5+/6 and fiber. Only expect to use the copper for now but at only 50 bucks a unit to rough it in its worth it when you really want to do it.

  11. Hire a pro by semanticgap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wiring is the kind of thing best left to people who deal with it every day. I'd get a cabling company to give you a quote on running CAT5 to every unit and instaling a patch panel in some closet. They'll have the right tools to pull the cable, will be able to test it and will be responsible for fixing if anything isn't working.

    I really wouldn't recommend pulling the cable yourself unless you really know what you're doing. BTW, depending on where it's pulled, it might need to be plenum or riser rated, and there may additional fire/code regulations for your area. You may need a license for cabling - but the cabling people would know all that.

  12. too tight, ditch the extra M$ work. by twitter · · Score: 4, Informative
    Cat 5 is a good idea, but you might provide your neighbors with more than DHCP if you can. The single port - non routable address thing would suck for anyone who wants to use more than a single computer or serve content. "locking down unused ports" and forcing all outbound SMTP though your own mail server is equally obnoxious. What you would be providing is a faster browsing experience for a single user in each place rather than Internet Service. That's a terrible waste of a T1 or whatever your upstream service is.

    It's amazing how far out of their way people will go to support Microsoft's crap. More than half of your list is Microsoft specific. Realize also that #10, " Insist customers keep their machines virus free. Disconnect any who don't IMMEDIATELY." eliminates the need for most of the other M$ virus precations, especially the silly M$ patch server which could get you a BSA visit. Why bother when you could recomend Linux or a Mac?

    All small ISPs are going to be blacklisted by AOL/MSNBC regardless of how well or poorly you treat your users.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:too tight, ditch the extra M$ work. by freeweed · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's amazing how far out of their way people will go to support Microsoft's crap. More than half of your list is Microsoft specific.

      How'd you come up with this? Only one thing even mentioned Microsoft, and also mentioned Apple in the same breath. Let's see:

      1) Don't put DSL to each unit - pull CAT-5 and run Ethernet. Your residents will have a much easier time getting hardware than with DSL, and your costs will be less.

      OS independant.

      2) Pull the wire to a common router closet.

      OS independant.

      3) One port per unit

      OS independant.

      4) Lock down the ports that aren't being used.

      OS independant.

      5) Use DHCP to assign addresses.

      OS independant.

      6) Set up your own caching server. I would recommend using Squid.

      OS independant.

      7) Force all outbound port 25 (SMTP) through your mail server.

      OS independant.

      8) Run a virus scanner on your mail server. Scan all incoming AND outgoing mail.

      Ok, *most* viruses are Windows-based. Most != all, however.

      9) Don't route the Microsoft file sharing ports or Apple Rendezvous ports between units.

      Again, mostly a Microsoft issue.

      10) Insist customers keep their machines virus free. Disconnect any who don't IMMEDIATELY.

      Remember, there are viruses for every platform out there.

      11) Write into your rental contracts that you ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE for maintaining your customer's machines or security - if they are scared let them run their own firewall.

      OS independant.

      12) Offer your own space, accessible to your users, with virus scanner updates, MS patches, and so on. Encourage them to use that to save bandwidth.

      There have been an order of magnitude more patches for my RedHat box this past month than for all versions of Windows combined. And most Windows patches have little to do with viruses, although many of these vulnerabilities do end up being exploited by worms at some point.

      13) Routinely sniff around for WAPs. Handle them as you see fit - disconnect, or verify they are set up sanely. Don't ignore them.

      Has nothing to do with what OS people run.

      Of course, this doesn't even touch on the fact that the reason people spend so much time supporting Microsoft products is that Windows/Office/etc are 90%+ of their respective markets. Duh, you kind of have to. It's all fine and dandy to be an OSS zealot, but when you're trying to provide a service to people, it's rather impractical to just say 'run what I tell you to run'. That sort of thinking is why we hate Microsoft in the first place, remember? :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:too tight, ditch the extra M$ work. by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      but you might provide your neighbors with more than DHCP if you can

      Why? They can use NAT. You probably are... or are you actually going to get a class C subnet for your condo association? I wouldn't bother - it's not worth the time and money.

      It does screw anyone trying to serve content, but I'm not sure that I'd care that much.

      More than half of your list is Microsoft specific.

      Uh... no it wasn't. There were 3 points that could be considered MS specific (8, 10, 12), and I'd dispute #8. There are Mac and Linux viruses out there. If either becomes a significant user base then there will be far, far more.

      No, 7, 9, and 11 are not MS related. Number 7 deals specifically with spam. Number 9 is basic security and privacy. Number 11 is true regardless of OS -- or have you never heard of script kiddies and rootkits?

      The patch server wouldn't get them a BSA visit either, you're allowed to redistribute patches.

      In any case, welcome to the Real World, where 95% of all systems will be Windows. If you don't take precautions against that then you're just an idiot.

      Less zealotry, more reality.

  13. My Apartment by Globe199 · · Score: 4, Informative

    My apartment complex is its own ISP. They installed ethernet in their buildings in 1996, starting with two T-1 lines.

    With approximately 1000 total residents for all the buildings, this setup worked fairly well at first because not very many people had computers that were network-ready.

    Around late 1999, the network began slowing down. A year later, streaming video was impossible, and by late 2001, I was better off using a dialup. It was BAD.

    About a year ago, they added two more T-1s, and it's been smooth sailing since. There are about 400 people in my building, maybe 500 in the next, and 100 or so in the other places. The network is almost always fast. Obviously this is due to adding the extra bandwidth. One can assume that the user-base has reached its saturation by now (almost everyone has a computer with a NIC, since it's a student-oriented place), so they probably won't have any more speed problems.

    They banned Kazaa and Morpheus, and apparently that helped. They don't give you an e-mail address or server space. They simply provide network connectivity. It's actually not a bad deal -- at $100/year, it's as fast an any cable modem or DSL connection.

    I think two T-1s would probably be alright for only 160 units. And I might recommend Cat-5E wiring. We just rewired my work's building with about 500 data ports, using 5E. Everything is gigabit ready. Sure, 100-base-T is fast, but are you gonna want to rewire the whole damn place in five years when you want gig? Probably not. It cost us $120,000 for those 500 data ports and about 300 voice ports. Plan ahead!

    Globe199

  14. Hidden costs / SLAs by MightyTribble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's your Outage / backup strategy?

    You could run the entire block off a low-end Cisco router, but are you budgeting for a Cisco service contract and / or a 'hot spare' router?

    How about line monitoring and alerts? Backups / service contracts for your switches? Environmental systems to keep your equipment closet nice and frosty? Factored in the electrical costs of that to your business plan?

    Who's going to support the system? What do you do if a switch craps out at 3am? Running a community ISP can be fun, but it's *less* fun if you've not thought of these things before you start. :)

  15. Combo 10/100/1000 + fiber by Charcharodon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Dlink's site. You can wire the individual buildings with 10/100 and then use fiber to connect them to a central router for the T1. The prices are down in the range of reasonable for the switch that have 10/100 and a pair of fiber ports. You'd have plenty of speed and distance wouldn't be much of an issue.

  16. Thing of the bigger picture by isotope23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Run cat5 if possible. Before you do that, I assume the condos have cat3 for phone? If so, how are they wired? It could be possible to use the existing cable to run on a 10 meg backbone, dirt cheap.

    You also need to think of other possible options.
    A big one, Voice over IP. With a 100 meg backbone in place, you could replace all the traditional phone service as well as providing internet.
    (some legal issues here to look at though).

    I'd implement it as follows :

    1. Do a SURVEY of interested tenants. Include VOIP as an option.
    2. check Cat3 option, use it if possible.
    3. Get some .11b wifi points for quick setup, rollouts to early adopters, and as backup gear
    when something fails... (it would really depend on how many IDF's you are going to place)
    4. Plan your IDF locations carefully. Remember environmental and power factors.
    5. Use the WIFI AP's to go from IDF to MDF on a temporary basis until you can rollout a fiber backbone.
    6. Monitor and then put Rate-limiting into effect for the people who abuse the service, i.e. mp3's and warez out to the outside world.
    7. Make clear service terms so the users know what to expect and what not to do.
    8. Someone will have to monitor/troubleshoot this service. If you don't have someone, an option would be contract out with a Local ISP, or
    perhaps a local computer consultant.

    Finally, for those not interested in paying a monthly fee, offer LAN access for free, (to get them hooked as it were)

    Without knowing more details the above is all I can give you. Hope it works out!

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  17. Don't forget the lawyers by tbase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of good posts about the hardware and connection, but don't forget your EULA. Some things to consider:

    1) Have a good privacy policy
    You may need to fall back on it if the authorities (or the RIAA) come knocking for your logs. If they badger you into turning them over without a court order, you could be in one of those stories about the criminals sueing because they got caught.

    2) Look at the big ISP's agreements for ideas
    You may see something you hadn't thought of.

    3) Lawyers are much more cost effective when used to prevent you from being sue, rather than defend you after the fact. Think about having one draft or review your agreement.

    Not trying to scare you, just make sure you're covered if the guy on the third floor turns out to be a pedophile, terrorist, or (gasp) file trader. :-)

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  18. DSLAMs are cheap and plentiful! by isdnip · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, I do this type of thing for a living, as a consultant to the CLEC and ISP trades, so I know a thing or two about the DSL market. Please, please, ignore the consensus of the Slashdot crowd who want you to pull Ethernet! They imagine that they'd want the better speed, but as a provider, you have to face reality. DSL has real advantages:

    1) It lets you control the top speed. I suggest that the top speed to a user be less than half of your feed speed. A company I work very closely with has almost 200 DSL lines in a luxury condominium. They feed it with only two T1s. That's quite adequate! They have to pay for that bandwidth -- backbone ISP service isn't cheap, and the T1 loops into the condo aren't free either. Of course they only provide 700 kbps service. Sure, people might like more, but the competition is dial-up, and price matters.

    2) DSL tolerates long wire. It can go a few miles, after all -- even a sprawling condo complex is a short hop for DSL. Ethernet tends to be pickier.

    3) ADSL can share wire with telephone. You might be able to piggyback onto the phone wire. (A CLEC can; whether you can is a different issue.)

    4) DSL is cheap! Lots of providers tanked, leaving good working gear on the secondary market. A 500-line Lucent Stinger can be had for $12k; a 200-line ADSL DSLAM is maybe half that. SDSL needs its own wire pair (can't share phone like ADSL) but the DSLAMs are a glut on the market, much cheaper than even that. Check eBay, telephone.com, etc.

    I'd be happy to talk more about this offline (isdnip at netscape dot net)....

  19. Support, NAT and the Future by AndyBarrow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are my 2 cents worth. I've been in and around this stuff for 26 years (and yes, I do have, what used to be prematurely, grey hair):

    1. Put in CAT5, or even CAT6 if you can afford it. Put in twice as much as you think is reasonable. Get it certified and tested. Next time you think you need just those couple of extra pair, you won't regret it. The big hit in any infrastructure installation is labor - you are going to spend about as much for labor to have two CAT6 cables pulled in to a jack as you would pay to have one CAT5.

    2. NAT would be a pain in the ass for your users if they want to do anything more complex than web browsing and mail. This sounds like a multi-year project - what do you think people are going to be doing with the Internet in two years? Doing SIP telephony, H.323 multimedia, etc. etc. through a NAT connection borders on impossible for an average user.

    3. No matter what you think the skill level is of your users, cut it in half. People seem to get dumber than dirt when they get home at night. I have personal experience - I'm living in a residential compound in Kazakhstan right now. I spend my days working for the Man, nights dealing with residents who stuck floppy disks to their fridges with magnets.

    4. All the cool stuff like web cache, proxy servers, even community web sites are very nice. With every single item, just think about who is going to support those things after you make your fortune and move to a grass hut in Tonga? KISS in all things.

    5. On the subject of support - residents are 24/7/365. When the Smith family can't have that video conference with Grandma on Christmas morning, who they gonna call? Set up a well understood service level agreement that every resident signs. Make it simple, but clear. The rule of thumb is that if it can be explained in an elevator between floors, it's about right.

    6. Fiber isn't that expensive, and there are some cool devices available now for doing lots of fun things with it. Investigate using it for house distribution. In 5 years when those 2mb DSL connections become passe', and folks start wanting those 10-20mb connections, they will look at your portrait on their mantle and smile.

    7. Here's a turnaround for you: Have you thought about cable modems? Not only can you do a few channels for high speed data, you can also do digital TV distribution, and telephone distribution. What if the folks had a TV channel for the community front gate, so they could see when the mother-in-law is coming?

    Have fun - this if obviously a passion for you. On those all-nighters when you are trying to solve some stupid routing problem, remember it was YOUR idea.

    Andy

    --
    "You can't have everything. Where would you keep it?" -- Steven Wright