Slashdot Mirror


Indiana Jones coming to DVD in November

DaSpudMan writes "The "Indiana Jones" trilogy, one of the most requested film series for the DVD format, is finally slated for worldwide release Nov. 4 as "The Adventures of Indiana Jones -- The Complete DVD Movie Collection," a box set that will include a fourth disc specifically dedicated to bonus materials."

46 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. Figures by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah, just in time to be bought by the truckload, before the DVD set that includes movie #4 comes out.

    That assumes, of course, that movie #4 turns out to be worth paying money for.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:Figures by terrox · · Score: 4, Funny

      People buy things because they are worth paying for now? Has Consumerism gone MAD!?

  2. Awesome by LordYUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    This trilogy was one of my all time favorites, I can't even begin to count the number of times I've seen the Temple of Doom (my favorite of the three).

    Of course, they arent replacing the Nazi's with ewoks, and the guns with walkie talkies, right?

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Awesome by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't even begin to count the number of times I've seen the Temple of Doom (my favorite of the three)

      I sincerely hope that was sarcasm :)

    2. Re:Awesome by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Contrary to popular belief, a lot of people like Temple of Doom. While it's a radical departure from the storyline of the first movie, and the story is hokey, well, it's still pretty damn cool. And John Williams's score for the Thuggee ceremony gives me nightmares. It's the single most evil piece of music I think I've ever heard (except for Wumpscut).

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Awesome by amembrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I heard they're replacing the Nazis with movie pirates and the guns with tablet pcs running Kazaa.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    4. Re:Awesome by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I think that Darth Vader's Imperial March was more ominous and evil than the Thuggee Ceremony.

      Should John Williams ever pass away, he would leave a much larger impact on /. culture than the million deaths of Stephen King.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    5. Re:Awesome by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your point about the Imperial March is well-taken. But the Thuggee Ceremony music is more.. well, nightmarish. To put it in D&D terms, I think it's a matter of Orderly Evil vs. Chaotic Evil.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    6. Re:Awesome by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Really, I think the reason that most people are so down on the second film is that it's so "different" from the first one.

      The reason I think people are so down on the second one is two things:

      1. If you want gross-out factor, you go to see some gross-out movie. Raiders wasn't a gross-out film, it was a fun movie with a decent plot with some special effects to help where necessary. But nothing was done just to be gross and disgusting as was the case in Doom.

      2. Raiders and Last Crusade are based on things which many people consider historic. I.e., the Ark of the Covenant existed and really is "lost", and the chalice of the last supper obviously existed (he had to drink out of something!). Wheter they had the powers attributed to them in the movies is certainly open to discussion, but the movies were based on historical artifacts and placed in the Nazi era. Take some historical objects and have fun with them. In Doom we're talking mass child abductions and glowing Shakras that make the fields green. Please...

      And I, for one, thought that little Chinese kid was just annoying. I think he was placed there for comic relief, like Jar Jar, but I think it failed miserably. Raiders was "funny" because of what Harrison Ford brought to the film, not because of some useless and silly 9-year-old running around saying stupid lines in less-than-understandable English. That's not my idea of funny and I think it further detracted from the second film. You notice a silly character such as that wasn't needed in the first or third movie and they were much funner to watch.

    7. Re:Awesome by PaleBoy · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm sorry, but this last post has got to be the nerdiest thing I've ever read, even on Slashdot.

      Of course, that's not a bad thing. But seriously. Read it again. And tally up the nerd points:

      • Movie Soundtracks- ding!
      • Star Wars - ding ding!
      • Comparing soundtracks to D&D alignments- DING DING DING!
      • Using the phrase "to put it in D&D terms" - We have a winner!
      --
      ------ What's sadder than realizing you've filtered out your own comments?
  3. That Song by msheppard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we can have that song in our heads for a straight 4 hours.

    Bum ba dum-dum! Bum ba dum!

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  4. And thankfully... by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Spielberg isn't replacing Indy's whip with a cellphone.

    (Moderated, -1, Hahaha! Very Funny Dr. Jones!)

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:And thankfully... by banzai51 · · Score: 3, Funny

      But will Lucas call him and make the big sword guy shoot first?

  5. percent of revenue by AbdullahHaydar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's about time they released these DVDS....

    I'm surprised they took so long, considering DVDs are such a huge percent of the total revenue movies make for a studio.

    --


    Suicide Booth: You are now dead! Thank you for using Stop and Drop, America's favorite since 2008.
  6. You also can't buy the movies separately. by Pop+n'+Fresh · · Score: 5, Informative

    In true George Lucas maximum money-extraction fashion, you will not be able to buy the films separately, only as a box set.

    --
    *This page intentionally left pointless*
    1. Re:You also can't buy the movies separately. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see what the point is in wanting them separately, the entire box looks pretty well priced to me. Is there a movie in this set that is significantly below standard? I figure if the movies were released separetely, you'd find them for $20 each, so even if one movie is only worth half that of the other two, you'd still get a pretty decently priced set.

  7. Those have been on P2P networks for ages... by replicant_deckard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fellow P2P users reply: Dr. Jones. Again we see there is nothing you can possess which I cannot take away.

    1. Re:Those have been on P2P networks for ages... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too bad the MPAA don't know you like I do, Bellocq.

      Yes, you could warn them if only you spoke MPAA...

    2. Re:Those have been on P2P networks for ages... by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

      make sure you read that comment several times. You might have said more than you meant...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  8. Re:This would be the first trilogy I'd buy and thr by eam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note that it is a trilogy, yet it contains 4 disks. Clearly they intended movie #2 to be removed & discarded.

  9. I'll admit it by sirgoran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll buy them. Maybe not as a boxed set, but I'll buy them. There are only a few movies IMO that are worth owning. Since I have kids, there is far too much crap on regular TV so it's nice to have something they can watch over and over. On the plus side, it's also something I don't mind watching over and over. Trust me, you can only watch Lion King and Little Mermaid so much before you want to go Postal...

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  10. Re:Hope it not like Back to the Future by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope that Lucas' stickler for quality attitude makes this set a good one.

    Stickler for quality? Lucas? You have SEEN the new Star Wars movies, right?

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  11. No commentary track by Scryber · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "We felt that because of bandwidth issues and, more importantly, the amount of information provided on the fourth disc, it would be redundant to include a director's commentary track on the title discs," Ward said.

    Bullshit. Just tell the truth: For whatever reasons, Spielberg doesn't do commentaries. However I don't see why some other producer (Luca$) or writer (Kasdan) couldn't have provided a commentary. Citing "bandwidth issues" is a laugher. And I for one prefer to actually have a commentary while the movie is running. Just not the same hearing production insights on a bonus disc.

    1. Re:No commentary track by jweatherley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I couldn't care less about the stupid director's commentary. I would much rather see them spend their bandwidth on less-compressed video and audio streams.

      I quite like commentaries - providing the commentators have something worth saying of course. Some of my favourite ones are Ridley Scott on Alien, Tom Baker on some of the BBC Dr Who DVDs and Sam Raimi on the Evil Dead. Actually Evil Dead has two commentaries one by Raimi/Tabert (producer) and the other by Bruce Campbell the lead actor. Both commentraies are pretty interesting - you find out that someone's sister got roped in because the original actress pissed off halfway through filming when the money ran out.

      The ones that tend to suck are the recent main stream Hollywood movies - lots of gushing about how wonderful everyone is. Even then you're not sacrificing that much video quality for the 150MB that a plain stereo commentary track costs so I don't really mind. Anyway Region 2 DVD's tend to have half a dozen European language tracks and a dozen subtitle tracks so we're used to non-video things filling the disc.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  12. Sigh... by Murdock037 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing like submitting a story, only to find it posted when you get back to the main page.

    Anyways. This is good, mostly-- nice to have the movies in widescreen, with decent quality. But there's a few problems, as I see it:

    1. No commentary. I understand that Spielberg prefers to "keep the magic," as he's put it, but come on. These are for posterity. Let's get some thoughts. There's no way fifteen minutes worth of interview on a bonus disc is going to do it.

    2. They're still trying to change the title of the first movie, and it pisses me off-- it's "Raiders of the Lost Ark," not "Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark." Cripes. It's one of the most popular films of all time. If you don't already know who's in it, I think the front freaking cover is a fine clue, thanks.

    3. We're gonna have to buy it all again after the fourth movie comes out, right?

    On the plus side, the content of the movies themselves haven't been changed. In other words, Indy still shoots first.

    More information and a peek at the cover art, if you're curious, can be found at DVD File.

    1. Re:Sigh... by JPZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing like submitting a story, only to find it posted when you get back to the main page.

      Don't worry, your submission of this story will be on the front page tomorrow.

      Joris

  13. Funny school reports from famous people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    St. Peaceful's School for the Sons of Gentlefolk
    Name of Pupil: JONES, Indiana
    Age: 8
    Dear Mr and Mrs Jones,
    I understand that in order to get to school this morning Indiana leapt from the branches of a tree on to the roof of a passing vehicle, crawled the length of this vehicle (nearly falling off at least four times as he avoided having his head knocked off by low bridges), dangled precariously over the side hanging on by the fingertips of one hand while he scratched his knee with the other and then leapt fearlessly through a small side window, receiving not a single scratch in spite of the thousands of razor sharp pieces into which the glass shattered.
    Would you please instruct your son that he must be like all the other children, and use the school bus stop.
    Mrs Ida Rather Knot
    Form Mistress

    1. Re:Funny school reports from famous people by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually his given name was Henry, Jr. If you remember what Henry Jones Sr. (Sean Connery) said at the end of the 3rd movie, they named the dog Indiana.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  14. Finally by imperator_mundi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once upon a time Mr Lucas was the coolest guy in hollywood one and Indiana Jones and Starwars were the trilogies... millions of fans dreamed if they could ever see a fourth Indy film or a new Starwars stuff.

    Present day: Lord of the ring and Matrix are the trilogies, nobody is really excited 'bout Episode 3 and even worse too many remember Mr Lucas as the man who created Jar Jar Binks...

    so there's no reason left to delay the DVD edition of Indy, hype about it is shrinking not growing.

    1. Re:Finally by Kithkill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a good thing, though - it shows that there isn't a film to end all films. The Matrix and LOTR may be popular now, but give Hollwood another 20 years, and who knows what we'll be watching? Despite it all, the original spirit of those films is there on celluloid forever, and I for one will be buying the DVDs in order to partake of that special Indy magic. Extras are all well and good, and usually I love them, but this is one of those rare cases where I'll be buying the box-set just for the films, not for the whole package.

      --
      Cheers, Kithkill
    2. Re:Finally by salesgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Raiders was one of the few films that could have been made any time in Hollywood history and been a huge hit. It was simply a great film in all respects - and it was original.

      The best movies are original fiction, most often not a movie version of a great book.

      --
      -- $G
  15. a Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    A manager has placed an ad for a secretary. A blonde, a redhead and a brunette show up for the interview.

    The brunette enters first, the interview begins with the usual where, how, how much etc. In the end the manager says: ".. and one last question. How many T's are there in INDIANA JONES?".
    The brunette takes a moment to think and replies:
    ".. there are not T's ..."
    "Precisely replies the manager, that was the answer I was expected. Very well, we will contact you shortly."

    It's the redhead's turn, the interview begins with the usual where, how, how much etc. In the end the manager says:
    ".. and one last question. How many T's are there in INDIANA JONES?".
    The redhead takes a moment to think and replies:
    ".. there are not T's ..."
    "Precisely replies the manager, that was the answer I was expected. Very well, we will contact you shortly."

    Finally the blonde enters, the interview begins with the usual where, how, how much etc. In the end the manager asks:
    ".. and one last question. How many T's are there in INDIANA JONES?".
    The blonde is thinking hard, going into deep analytical thought and asks for a calculator,
    The clickety clicks begin, she gives it some more thought and finally replies:
    ".. there are 32 T's!"
    The manager says that he wasn't expecting that answer. He asks her, however, how she had arrived to that conclusion and if she had misinterpreted the question. Her reply left him speechless:
    Listen

  16. The BTTF discs have been fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    a) BTTF is a Universal movie.
    b) The discs have been fixed. Look for a "V2" (version 2) on the widescreen/full frame sticker.
    c) You can send the old discs back to Universal for a free replacement.
    BACK TO THE FUTURE DVD RETURNS
    PO Box 224468
    Dallas, Texas 75260

    They will even pay for the shipping.
    d) Stop Trolling.

  17. Re:Observe... MPAA by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who said anything about paying for it? The good thing about this piece of news is that we'll *finally* get DVD-quality DivX rips of the movies on Kazaa.

  18. Is it magic pixie dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't get it. Nice to have them out finally...

    Spielberg and Lucas treat DVD as though its a big trumpeting event.

    Where's SW? Where's Schindlers list?
    Where's THX1138?

    They're so corporate now, anything they produce is so mechanical, so by the numbers that it's hardly an art form anymore, it's a style. You could easily see the same story and visual structure in EVERY spielberg and Lucas film. Janus Kaminsky (Spielberg's cinematographer) has lost all creativity due to the fact that he's made nothing but spielberg movies for the last decade.

    Watch Jurassic Park for the shots of people "looking" at things off camera. Then watch ANY other one of his films, and it'll be ruined for you. That's HALF of his shot list on any given film. AHHHH!

    My other issue is the PR at Lucasfilm's flimsy excuse for the lack of commentary.

    Spielberg won't do them. Point blank. Don't feed us an excuse that "in order to save space..." for not doing it. If you wanted to save space, there'd be a DTS track on there. Screw his position on not wanting to reveal his "magic"...

    Unless they're going to be single layer discs, it's got plenty of space for DTS, DD 5.1, commentary, and a French track for Quebec.

  19. Bonus material: gimmicks by Malc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anybody else dislike most of this bonus material? It seems like waste of money and a gimmick to me.

    The documentaries and interviews always seem rather contentless and full of people who take themselves too seriously, talk too much about inconsequential things, and go on self-importantly in a self-promotion about how wonderful their movie is, and all the people in it.

    I know whether I liked a movie or not - I don't need propaganda to convince me otherwise. Really, most of the bonus material is just plain dull. Really, most Hollywood movies are just some quick entertainment which doesn't require much concentration, so why take them so seriously? Earth shattering movies are few and far between - and it's the content of the story that matters, not how the movie was made or how wonderful all the actors and actresses are. These people have too much ego. I'd be happy with more of Jackie Chan's routine: out-takes during the closing credits (although they'd require more effort than those with The Tuxedo).

  20. Cleaned up film transfer? by Pootenheimer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone know if the film transfer will be cleaned for DVD? I, for one, would prefer not to see in blissful DVD detail the reflection of the snake in the glass during the scene in the snake pit in Raiders. Kind of takes you out of your immersion in the movie a bit.

    --
    Move sig. For great justice.
    1. Re:Cleaned up film transfer? by Destacona · · Score: 3, Informative
      From the press release -
      Each of the three films in THE ADVENTURES OF INDIANA JONES - THE COMPLETE DVD MOVIE COLLECTION was painstakingly restored by Lowry Digital Images - the film industry's most noted preservationists - whose work has included such classics as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Sunset Boulevard.
  21. What, no Special Edition? by Trunks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damnit, and I wanted to see the swordsman swing first...

    --
    This post sponsored by Ninja Burger. "
  22. Re:No Commentary?!? by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure you're not aware, but Spielburg has NEVER, EVER done a commentary track. And he doesn't plan on it.

    Lawrence Bouzereau is his faithful documentary guy, and he has done the docs on Schindler's List, Jaws, Jurrasic Park, [insert Spielburg flick here] and will be (I'm sure) doing one for this set.

    Spielberg likes to allow the movie to speak for itself, though ironically he does do film school commentaries with an audience, to explain as best he can what he was trying to accomplish.

    Spielberg, however, won't allow these types of commentaries to be included.

    The press release says its because of bandwith issues, and that's simply a lie. No commentary, a small Dolby Digital 2.0 track, would ever take enough space to truly harm the picture.

    Besides, video and audiophiles get their bandwidth-filled goodness with the Superbit line, something Paramount has yet to embrace. For now they simply say they leave off commentaries and exciting extras on each disc because "the picture will look better."

    Of course, The Godfather has 9 hours of commentary, and you didn't hear them screaming "picture quality forever!" on that release, now did you?

  23. Re:Why such a huge ad campaign? by pdbogen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hell, they'd sell 'em faster than they could make them if they cut out the advertising, cut prices, and submitted a story to Slashdot.

  24. Re:Widescreen fixed and available for free. by Stele · · Score: 5, Informative

    The correct number is 1-888-703-0010.

    They do ask you what you noticed wrong about the movies. And they do read the little message from Universal with the widescreen/fullscreen typo.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Re: Movie #4? by johndiii · · Score: 4, Funny

    Working title: "Indiana Jones and the Wheelchair of Destiny"

    --
    Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  27. Re:Why such a huge ad campaign? by payndz · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Last year, I went to a Paramount press event for the DVD launch of Grease and some other Travolta/musical movies. The sheer amount of money that was spent absolutely stunned me. As well as flying in several hundred people (journalists, distributors, suits from Paramount's various international subsidiaries) from all around the world, *first class all the way*, hotels, limos, everything, they laid on a red carpet event at the studio, various stars turned up, there was a Grease cast reunion *and* they got Travolta and Olivia Newton John to sing together. Dunno about her, but I bet Travolta didn't do it just for some free wine and burgers.

    We're talking an event that easily ran into millions of dollars to stage, all told. (Not that I'm complaining - I've never flown first class before, and doubt I ever will again either, but it was very enjoyable!) And this is *without* adding in the cost of the actual DVD advertising on TV and the press.

    Yet studios are always somehow claiming to be strapped for cash. Hmmm. Hollywood is an insane place...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  28. Next, maybe Star Wars? by crashnbur · · Score: 3, Interesting
    (Here is a copy of the press release announcing the Indiana Jones trilogy DVD.)

    Before I get started, check OriginalTrilogy.com, a web site dedicated to the preservation of the original theatrical cuts (and eventually have them released on DVD as well, not just the special editions) of the films of the classic Star Wars trilogy. See their FAQ for more information. Signatories number around 29,500 at the moment; 30,000 could be reached within the day!

    Now, on with the show...

    From September 2001, LucasFilm clarifies that they can not simply jump into a DVD project for the classic Star Wars trilogy. It will take time, but from the hints presented here, it should be worth the wait! (I still think Lucas could make a fortune by releasing *only* the movies, everything we have on VHS so far, as individual titles on DVD.) From the September 2001 feature:
    An ever-increasing number of archival projects from other studios are also readying the THX team for a time when Lucas will be available to focus on releasing the classic trilogy on DVD. "We have an advantage that some very great work was done by Rick McCallum and his group back in '97. So we have restored films and we have a lot of work that was put in that first step with the restoration job back then," says Dean.

    "I've certainly heard that there's a lot of material that has been in the archives that never has come out. I imagine it will be a very, very long, tedious process to make it work," he speculates. "Frankly, that's why DVD is just not something that you jump into. There is a lot of planning behind that."
    Another article from February 2000 expresses more reasons for delaying development of the trilogy's DVD. It seems as though fears of pirated copies of Star Wars films is a major concern, though LucasFilm denied this then. (As technology has improved, I wonder if they would still deny it, or if they would simply deny this as a reason for delaying the DVD project.)

    Although about twenty and forty months old, respectively, this is still more information than the StarWars.com FAQ, updated quite frequently, gives:
    When will the classic trilogy come out on DVD?
    The films of the classic trilogy will eventually come out on DVD, but it won't be this year.
    Thanks, George. We got that memo.

    Last tidbit. According to this FAQ, Natalie Portman may shoot some scenes for the Return of the Jedi DVD, and Jimmy Smits (Bail Organa, Princess Leia's adopted father, who is presumably but not necessarily on planet Alderaan when the Death Star destroys it) may shoot some scenes for the A New Hope DVD.