Slashdot Mirror


Dancing Barefoot

Christopher Holland writes "If you've followed the recent phenomenon of blogging at all, you've probably run across the weblog (online journal) of Wil Wheaton at wilwheaton.net. Wheaton, best known to film fans as Wesley 'The Boy' Crusher from Star Trek: The Next Generation, has reinvented his public persona from oft-derided teen idol to a kind of affable head-geek. From his web site, the thirty-something actor and writer dispatches frequent updates about his working and personal life, his memories and thoughts on the Trek experience, and the technology that fascinates him and his geek brethren." Christopher reviews below Dancing Barefoot, the smaller of Wheaton's new books (the other will be out soon). Dancing Barefoot author Wil Wheaton pages 107 publisher Monolith Press rating 7 reviewer Christopher Holland ISBN 0974116009 summary Wil Wheaton holds forth on being a geek with a blog.

After nearly two years of blogging, Wheaton compiled and edited an autobiography from his blog entitled Just a Geek, to be released in June 2003. Several of the stories which didn't fit into Geek have been collected in a smaller companion volume, Dancing Barefoot, which is now available from Wheaton's publishing company, Monolith Press (www.monolithpress.com). The legions of Trek fans who have rediscovered Wheaton as a guy much like themselves, as well as those weblog readers who enjoy Wil's humor but don't know the difference between trilithium and tribbles, will find Barefoot irresistable. Those with only a casual interest in Wheaton but familiar with Trek will find the book's showpiece, The Saga of Spongebob Vegas Pants, well worth reading. Wheaton's conversational, intimate writing style may even convince them to read the rest of the book. Cartoon illustrations provided by Ben A. Claassen III are an excellent complement to the casual essays.

Barefoot begins with four short pieces, essentially vignettes of days (or even moments) in the author's life. These range from the amusing (ruminations on teenaged lust and paths untaken) to the melancholy (Houses in Motion, a paean to Wheaton's deceased great aunt), and one needn't be told that they were culled from journal entries, because they very much read that way. The best is Houses -- although it sometimes ranges into maudlin territory, it is also the most courageous writing in the book. Wheaton's generation has been raised on a diet of pop culture and cynicism, and it's invigorating -- if somewhat startling -- to see someone of that generation openly expressing such feelings of devotion and despair.

The man who spent his formative years aboard the starship Enterprise departs from the short form for the final and most engrossing portion of the book, the aforementioned Spongebob Vegas Pants. It's the chronicle of a Star Trek convention held in Las Vegas, during which Wheaton tolerates the alternatingly ugly and kindly faces of fandom, but eventually rediscovers his enthusiasm for the Trek universe. Those who have attended such conventions will immediately recognize the fan archetypes, while those who have never been to such an event may decide that they never, ever want to. Fortunately, the story is less about the horrors of being a convention guest and more about the resolution of Wheaton's conflicted personal feelings about having been a part of the Trek phenomenon -- including his unpleasant run-ins with the original captain of the Enterprise, referred to repeatedly as William F---ing Shatner.

Certain sections of Dancing Barefoot could have used another turn under an editor's pen. Sponge Bob Vegas Pants, in particular, has a few passages that don't serve the story much, but as with the deleted scenes on a special edition DVD, some readers will be grateful for the extra material, regardless of how it affects the overall pace. Frequent atticisms will sustain the rest of the book's audience through the book's slower passages, though, and the author's humility is an effective antidote for the feeling that one might be about to read the memoirs of yet another self-indulgent celebrity blowhard -- which Mr. Wheaton certainly is not.

Given that the engaging Dancing Barefoot comprises the material that didn't make it into Just A Geek, it feels much like an appetizer to the larger work. Let's hope the main course is as tasty.

203 comments

  1. No need for a clever nickname... by los+furtive · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...just a clever book title.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  2. Boy Crusher? by athakur999 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wheaton, best known to film fans as Wesley The Boy Crusher

    I admit I didn't see all the episodes, but I don't remember seeing one where Wesley went around crushing boys.
    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    1. Re:Boy Crusher? by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wheaton, best known to film fans as Wesley The Boy Crusher
      Actually, he's probably best known to film fans as Gordie Lachance, from Stand By Me.

      He's best known to Star Trek film fans as 'Wesley, the boy on the cutting room floor.'

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Boy Crusher? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      I don't remember seeing one where Wesley went around crushing boys.

      They got it all wrong. The Traveller crushes him.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    3. Re:Boy Crusher? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its probably some fanfic episode. I hear they tend to lean that way from time to time.

    4. Re:Boy Crusher? by sharkey · · Score: 0, Troll
      Wesley went around crushing boys

      In Soviet Russia, boy crushes Wesley!!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Boy Crusher? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Well, I know he crushed *my* heart, running off with that bastard Q... Wesley, how could you?!?! ;)

    6. Re:Boy Crusher? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There's quite a bit of homoerotic fan fiction involving Wesley out there, if you look a little bit. Haven't read any 'boy crusher' stories though. Definitely NOT MY THING, thankyouverymuch.

    7. Re:Boy Crusher? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Q? WTF, he ran off with the Traveler. Someone needs to brush up on his ST:TNG. :)

    8. Re:Boy Crusher? by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny
      I admit I didn't see all the episodes, but I don't remember seeing one where Wesley went around crushing boys.

      You don't recall the show where Wesley sat in 10 forward, crouched in the corner behind a plant, and said,

      "Oh look at the little Klingon kid! Oh, Alexander . . . I have something for you . . .I'M CRUSHING YOUR HEAD!"

      Crush. Crush.

      "Hahahaha! How do you like it now, flathead?!"

      "Ohh . . .here comes Picard. I bet it will be hard for you to give me a speech about truth and duty when . . . I CRUSH YOUR HEAD!"

      Crush.

      Crush.


      I think they show it on Trek Uncut from time to time.
    9. Re:Boy Crusher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey,

      No fair commenting in a review of your own book. How can we talk about you when you let us know you read it.

      Next stop: Wil F___ing Wheaton-land

    10. Re:Boy Crusher? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Americans are familiar with the "Crush your head" skits? Woohoo! Phase one of the Canadian invasion has begun! Once we get power to the lasers in Pamela Anderson's nipples, we'll be unstoppable!

    11. Re:Boy Crusher? by ToadSprocket · · Score: 1

      What? No one is going to give props for the Kids in the Hall reference.

      Nice.

      When you are done with head crushing, do that thing where you make people puke.

      --


      If this article confuses you, don't worry. It was posted yesterday in a much clearer fashion.
    12. Re:Boy Crusher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you flunked out of Starfleet Academy before reaching the "Humor and Humility: How to Not Be Lame" class. Likely why nobody wanted you in ST:Nemesis.

    13. Re:Boy Crusher? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Fattest one in four counties! Now, Suck my fat one you cheap dime store hood.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  3. Bill Shatner, smashing the Canadian Stereotype... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    his unpleasant run-ins with the original captain of the Enterprise, referred to repeatedly as William F---ing Shatner

    At least youknew his name Wil.

  4. Trek, Blogging and Envy by Scot+Seese · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quite the number of trolls out today. Considering that Wil has enjoyed a somewhat unique experience in one of the most loved TV franchises in the modern era you think people would be more inclined to post thoughtful replies.

    Then again, I suspect the trolls are simply driven by a wracking, crushing feeling of sexual inadequacy.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    1. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you mean he had a bit part on one of the lamest pieces of tripe ever to be televised?

      Whoo fucking hoo for him.

    2. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Score: +1, Trollbait

      AC

    3. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Considering that Wil has enjoyed a somewhat unique experience in one of the most loved TV franchises in the modern era you think people would be more inclined to post thoughtful replies.

      Here's a thoughtful reply: This fellow is a TV Actor. Usually geeks figure stuff like this out and know to avoid it. Worship of TV actors is one of the uglier aspects of Trekkie-ness, and Slashdot should be better than that.

      I mean, 'Geek Boy' because his agent told him there's a niche market out there? Completely believable! But we're supposed to buy into it??

    4. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, the problem with that is, you drew a conclusion that makes no sense..trolls tend to do that. Some people just don't like Wil Wheaton much..personally I thought his appearances on TNG were detrimental to the quality of the show and its writing.

      Sexual inadequacy has nothing to do with this post, the comments below it, or anything else here for that matter. Thank you for providing the daily dose of irony, though..a troll complaining about trolls. Novel idea.

    5. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by magister707 · · Score: 0

      Then again, I suspect the trolls are simply driven by a wracking, crushing feeling of sexual inadequacy.

      I don't know who's modding this insightful; it's one of the oldest discussion group cop-outs.

      For those who are honestly wondering why people troll, so I'll offer a little help: culture jamming.

      A non-slasdot example.

    6. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by joshsisk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wil is definitely a geek. He learned HTML & PHP so he could create his web site himself, and has written at least one magazine article about Linux.

    7. Re:Trek, Blogging and Envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well if he knows PHP, then he *must* be a real bonafide nerd.

  5. Loved it - what else can I say. by RavenDarkholme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was lucky enough to get a sneak peek at Dancing Barefoot as well. If you've read Wheaton's blog at all, you may be familiar with his funny, often self-deprecating, and above all, honest writing style. Sometimes, his blog entries are brief one-liners, but other times, they are quite courageous and emotional stories that really draw you in.

    Even if you don't want to be drawn in.

    Of course, I wasn't all that drawn in, you know, 'cause I'm a bad ass.

    No, really.

    And I didn't get choked up at ALL reading any of it, especially the one about his Aunt Val's house.

    I did NOT.

    Shut up.

    Where was I? Oh yeah. Dancing Barefoot takes some stories that were previously on the blog, and adds to them, finishes them -- puts some more polish on the edges, and presents something that is incredibly human, touching, and even grand.

    This book is worth reading just for the Saga of Spongebob VegasPants alone. Even if you're a long-time blog reader, I can almost guarantee there is some stuff you haven't seen yet.

  6. Shut up Wesley!! by tfriedlich · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ok, I am actually going to buy this book. I am a sad sad man.

    1. Re:Shut up Wesley!! by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I am a sad sad man.

      No, not really. You are someone who has manged to seperate Wil Wheaton, the actor and human being, from Wesley Crusher, the scourge of mankind, and Satan's sex slave.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Shut up Wesley!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm..... Troll? or Insigtful.....

      I could go either way.

      well done.

  7. Positive? by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Great! Another positive review!

    I want to know more about its general feel! I want to know more about what I might not like! I want to know more than "There are parts that need to be polished, but ignore my last sentance"!

    /RANT

    An online Starcraft RPG? Only at
    In Soviet Russia, all your us are belong to base!

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    1. Re:Positive? by RavenDarkholme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I want to know more about its general feel! I want to know more about what I might not like! I want to know more than "There are parts that need to be polished, but ignore my last sentance"!

      The general feel is kind of like the author is a friend or a family member writing you a letter about stuff. Like the review says, "Hey, dude, you gotta check this out" kind of thing. It just sort of makes you feel like you know the guy, even though of course you don't. Like you might have hung out together in high school, then lost touch.

      What might you not like? Well, you might not like that kind of friendliness. The stories are emotional in many ways. Depending on your point of view, you might see them as overly sentimental or even maudlin. I didn't, but I know a few cynical folks to whom any indication of emotion is automatically sneered at. It's not a technical book. It's more of a glimpse into one person's life. If you don't care for personal glimpses, you might not like it.

      Dunno. I've watched some episodes of Star Trek, and even enjoyed them, but I had no idea who Wil Wheaton was until I once read his Slashdot interview. I just enjoy his writing, and this book contains some of the best.

      What else would you want to know?

      The illustrations are cool too.

      Heheh.

  8. Slashdot Wil again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like he'll be on fark again tonight...

  9. alt.wesley.crusher.die.die.die.die.die.die.die by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 3, Funny

    yeh, he's been a huge presence in usenet for some time now....

    maybe, we could get don lapre to write a book, too.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  10. Pro-Wrestling? by Otis2222222 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, this was a reference to his former pro-wrestling career, where his title was "Wesley, The Boy Crusher". It's a period that Wil would rather soon forget about, thank you very much.

  11. This is as handy as my old copy of the WWW Yellow by sammyo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Pages, a big fat list of links, which I assuredly did not pay for but was funny on the shelf. Reading old blogs on paper is just an ironic anachronism. Although if the guy makes money, good for him. Is this a troll? I'm not a troller in general but I'm not sure this time... ;-}

  12. What does his mother, the doctor, think about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does his mother, the doctor, think about this?

  13. Thoughtful writing by Metropolitan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad to see some of Wil's writing make it into print after having read his blog for so long. His style online, while not always what one would consider highly-polished (an asset, actually) is very heart-felt and honest.

    Nice to see someone who had an early acting career not show up as one of those 'and they found him in his car, stoned out of his mind, with 17 sheep and a bottle of vodka' sorts of stories. Wil seems to be a decent guy, and I hope he succeeds enough with his writing to make that his profession, if he chooses.

    Cheers, Uncle Wil.

    1. Re:Thoughtful writing by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Funny
      Nice to see someone who had an early acting career not show up as one of those 'and they found him in his car, stoned out of his mind, with 17 sheep and a bottle of vodka' sorts of stories.

      Whoa, is that Dana Plato in the back seat?!?!...

    2. Re:Thoughtful writing by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Isn't she dead? Oh...

  14. Just GREAT! by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wesley stole the title of my favourite Patti Smith song. I was gonna use it myself.

    It was in this movie script I've been working on which I'm not allowing anyone to see.

    There's no emoticon for how I feel...

    1. Re:Just GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, "Houses In Motion" is the title of one of my favorite Talking Heads songs. I sense a trend.

  15. So what's new/unique about this book? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What a content-free review. We're told time and time again that we will find this book facinating but never how this book provides something that books written by other Trek actors or other genXers doesn't. Are we supposed to find this 'better' than other books because of Wil's supposedly candor in his writing style? It's not clear to me.

    It sounds like this book is only directed towards Wheaton fans. This review doesn't suggest that this book will view already familiar subject matter from a fresh perspective. Maybe it does. Hell, I certainly don't know. But this review is terrible. The review also states that the book is comprised of four vingettes. Well, are these things actually related? Or is it just a collection of stuff? Again, the review doesn't say.

    Seriously, my time is pretty valuable. I only read stuff that I think will provide me with something fresh and new. This review does not tell me whether this book does such a thing.

    GMD

    1. Re:So what's new/unique about this book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Seriously, my time is pretty valuable.

      ...he says without a hint of irony, while posting on Slashdot about how valuable his time is...

    2. Re:So what's new/unique about this book? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      What a content-free review.

      You haven't read many of the recent Slashdot reviews, have you?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:So what's new/unique about this book? by cptgrudge · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Seriously, my time is pretty valuable. I only read stuff that I think will provide me with something fresh and new.

      And yet, there you sit, posting to slasdot.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    4. Re:So what's new/unique about this book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...he says without a hint of irony, while posting on Slashdot about how valuable his time is... ...about a book cut and pasted from a Star Trek actor's blog. He's got to be kidding.

  16. That's on PSG's Wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's on PSG's *Wave*, "Dancing Barefoot" is. The original tune was featured prominantly in a 1997 episode of Millennium. And covered a few times be lesser artists (U2, Beverly Sister, Kiss).

    1. Re:That's on PSG's Wave by los+furtive · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure what PSG stands for, but wasn't Dancing Barefoot originaly a Patti Smith song?

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    2. Re:That's on PSG's Wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PSG = Patti Smith Group.

  17. Re:What does his mother, the doctor, think about t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    She's too busy fucking Picard to care.

  18. Re:A geek? He should be claiming instead... by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Informative
    "I'm not a geek, but I play one on tv."
    He's running Mandrake on an iBook. Isn't that geek enough for you?

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  19. Wesley The Boy Crusher ?? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Was he a WWF^HE pro wrestler?

  20. What a comeback by t1nman33 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm surprised that Wil hasn't been on "Where Are They Now?" on VH1. It's absolutely amazing how hardcore-trekkers reviled him in yesteryear, and everybody else essentially ignored him. And here he is, a Slashdot regular. You gotta take your hat off to the guy...not everybody gets a second chance.

    --
    --- Where's my car, and why are these grass stains on my pants?
    1. Re:What a comeback by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm surprised that Wil hasn't been on "Where Are They Now?" on VH1.

      He may as well have been. He was on a similar show on ABC, "Our Favorite Stars, Then and Now," recently (May 8 I believe). He mentions it in his May 8 entry on his site.

      --

      As with the sun's light
      My mom was magnificent
      Unquestionable
    2. Re:What a comeback by tmark · · Score: 1

      here he is, a Slashdot regular. You gotta take your hat off to the guy...not everybody gets a second chance.

      God. I hope if *I* ever get a second chance it will be as something more than a Slashdot regular.

  21. Wil's on fark too by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I never thought many moons ago I would see someone on TV, and then talk to him many years later on this Internet thing.

    I discussed how much I hated some horror movie where his family was getting infected(I can't access IMDB right now). He replied on fark a few posts later how much he hated it as well.

    I felt like I upped my geek status at that point.

    1. Re:Wil's on fark too by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I never thought many moons ago I would see someone on TV, and then talk to him many years later on this Internet thing.
      .....
      I felt like I upped my geek status at that point.

      I have a saved email from Richard Stallman. The topic it was on is irrelevant to me now, but the fact that I corresponded with an uber geek and got a response other than the typical restraining order I usually receive is something that I wanted to record for posterity, so I have saved the email. Ah, the power of celebrity.

      Accordingly, please mod this, and all my future posts, "-1 -- Fucking Loser."

    2. Re:Wil's on fark too by ShaiHulud-23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Several years back I sent a short message to Terry Pratchett after finding his email address on alt.fan.pratchett, to which he is a regular poster. I didn't have much to say except to thank him for writing such great stories and I was sure he was so deluged with pointless fan-email that I would never get any acknowledgment from him. I was stunned to receieve a reply within 24 hours, to which I replied in kind, and 24 hours later got a reply to my reply to his reply. I could have tried to keep the correspondance going, but decided to stop pestering him at that point.

      Eight years, two computers and four email addresses later, I still have copies of those four messages saved on a floppy somewhere. That level of personal contact is much cooler than any autograph.

    3. Re:Wil's on fark too by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I discussed how much I hated some horror movie where his family was getting infected(I can't access IMDB right now).

      If you can access it, you can also see his filmography here.

      --

      As with the sun's light
      My mom was magnificent
      Unquestionable
    4. Re:Wil's on fark too by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I got a reply that was obvously from Paul Allen to a comment posted right here on Slashdot once. (relating to Bill Gates writing the code, in Assembly Language, for the word processor in the TRS-80 Model 100). It didn't affect my Geek Status very much, though, because P. Allen replied as A.C.

    5. Re:Wil's on fark too by dodobh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      /me looks at framed cheque for USD 2.56, signed by Donald E. Knuth.
      And the email responses to the correction I sent him :).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    6. Re:Wil's on fark too by Copperhead · · Score: 1
      Eric Raymond called my house to active my Chester County Interlink account about 10 years ago. I had no idea who he was.

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    7. Re:Wil's on fark too by Avumede · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to get a reply from Stallman. Just report a bug on emacs, and you'll soon hear from him.

    8. Re:Wil's on fark too by bourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a saved email from Richard Stallman. The topic it was on is irrelevant to me now, but the fact that I corresponded with an uber geek and got a response other than the typical restraining order I usually receive is something that I wanted to record for posterity,...

      I remember the first time I met Stallman, too. While a restraining order might have been appropriate, I wouldn't be the one needing to be restrained.

      I spent a few minutes before his talk wondering why Harvard let random homeless people walk around their lecture halls pretending they had a gun in their pocket and leering at people. Then he went up to the podium and started talking. Then he went insane when I threw out a hypothetical and included the phrase "god forbid", at which point he expounded loudly on his views that there is no god.

      I now have a theory that most people who worship the man haven't met him.

    9. Re:Wil's on fark too by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      I now have a theory that most people who worship the man haven't met him.

      Your theory may or may not be correct, but for the record, I think it helps my geek karma to have corresponded with RMS. Do I worship him? No. Do I defend everything he does? No. Do I think that he has done an awful lot to make free software possible and useful and do I respect his evangelism and contributions to free software? Yes. That's all.

      GF

    10. Re:Wil's on fark too by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Has anybody ever cashed one of those?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  22. Re:A geek? He should be claiming instead... by BugMaster+ChuckyD · · Score: 1

    Wheaton is a real geek. A Geek's geek even.

  23. Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    two of Canada's finest Shakespearean actors.

    Stop laughing.

    1. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What about Keanu Reeves?

    2. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, remember that one scene in MacBeth...

      "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!"

      Wonderful acting, that.

    3. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Whoa...

    4. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they both got to command their own starships, too! Those Canucks are really something.

    5. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know kung fu.

    6. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      There is no spoon...

    7. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by ebbomega · · Score: 1

      For the last time, Keanu, No you don't.

      ("Is the hot tea hot or cold? Keanu Reeves!" "Is it Iced tea?" "No.... it's HOT TEA" "Well then I have no clue.")

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    8. Re:Remember, Bill Shatner and Lorne Green, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was born in Lebanon with sticks of dynamite wired to his body.

      He went to Toronto Canada to learn to act, obviously failed, so he went to Hollywood.

  24. Best Wil Wheaton Interview by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Wil's interview with The Onion AV Club. Lots of good insights on the absurdity of child stardom, and the bizarre love/hate relationship with Star Trek fans.

    I think Wil's done a great job moving away from his strange past... hopefully he will soon find a strong movie role that suits his unique personality.

    1. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Wil's done a great job moving away from his strange past...

      Yeah, I'm sure his fame as Wesley played NO PART WHATSOEVER in his getting a publisher to buy the life story of a 30 year old.

    2. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he's not as trapped as Leonard Nimoy has been.

    3. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic, but I had to chuckle at your nickname. I'm old enough to have work with the SN74S181 and I was thinking of trumping your nickname with 74F181PC or SN74AS181DC

    4. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You could trump my nickname with the SN54S181. The military part. I think the regular Schottky part is faster than the F part, isn't it? I'd have to dig in some data books...

    5. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I believe the F series was generally faster than the Schottky parts.

    6. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe the F series was generally faster than the Schottky parts

      My understanding is that the 'F' parts were just standard TTL with the 'compromise between speed and power consumption' tipped in the direction of more speed and as a result more power consumption. Whereas the Schottky parts are a whole new class of device.

      But there are and were so damned many deriviative familes of TTL, as vendors tried to achieve product differentiation in a commodity logic market.

      To bring the thread back on topic- I doubt if Will Wheaton even knows what a 74LS30 is, let alone why it's a better part to use than a 7430.

    7. Re:Best Wil Wheaton Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that that is a bad thing. I could go on and on about the evolution of the 74LS169, to the LS169A, then the LS669, etc.

      I seem to remember that the ALS parts were compromise parts, but the F parts were faster than Schottky, but with moderate power. I had to check the Fairchild site and A or B to C+4 carry was 11ns for the F part. At the TI site, the 74S181/54S181 spec was 22ns.

  25. Re:Sad News... Will Wheaton dead at 30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and in a follow-up story, a large number of Anonymous Cowards committed an act of mass suicide

    but they were wearing cool shoes

  26. Can anyone really take this review seriously? by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 3, Funny
    . . .those weblog readers who enjoy Wil's humor but don't know the difference between trilithium and tribbles, will find Barefoot irresistable.

    Yeah, both of them.

  27. Dear Wil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me and my buddies were thinking about starting a bowling team, but we weren't sure what kind of team shirts we should wear. Do you have any ideas?

  28. In the future... by mikeophile · · Score: 1, Funny

    All the reviewers will be on grass and all the reviews will be astroturf.

  29. Re:Wil's wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you confusing Wil with the Vladinator? Or is Wil just as big a loser?

  30. This book is irrelevant, it will be assimilated. by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

    After checking Amazon and Barnes & Noble for the ISBN and title, there is no record of this book anywhere according to the my two favorite online book peddlers. Thae makes me sad.

    For the first time ever, inspired by this article, I checked out WIL WHEATON DOT NET (the newest programming language from M$? Aye, sir...), and was very pleased with the experience. Not all blogs suck, apparently. Yes, I'm a geek.

    If anyone can find a dead-tree merchant who's taking pre-orders for (or acknowledges the existence of) books by Wil Wheaton, post it here? Please?

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
  31. Why hasn't he posted yet? by jeblucas · · Score: 3, Funny
    The guy posts all over slashdot--how can he leave this alone? I expect to see a reply to parent from CleverNickName stating unequivocally:

    OMFG DANSIG BARFUT IS TEH FUTAR!!11

    With a link to Amazon.

    ...or at least his site, or someplace to buy it.

    --
    blarg.
    1. Re:Why hasn't he posted yet? by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Informative
      The guy posts [slashdot.org] all [slashdot.org] over [slashdot.org] slashdot [slashdot.org]--how can he leave this alone?

      Well, I didn't have anything to add to the conversation . . . but since you asked, I'll see if I can put something worthwhile in here.

      I read at 5, so forgive me if I don't bite on a particular troll.

      Someone asked if this is a "fresh perspective" on anything.

      I don't know. It's my perspective on several things:
      • accepting the loss of somone who is very dear to me
      • enjoying the things in my life that come with being a husband and stepfather
      • recalling some of the joyous days when I was a teenager, and the world was so simple (a fact to which I was oblivious)
      • accepting my place in the Star Trek world, and putting to bed some 17th level daemons (all with 4d12+5 Whips of Self Doubt)


      Should you buy it? I don't know. Only you can make that choice.

      Who is the anticipated audience? Well, people who read my weblog (about 500,000 a month, as of last week) will certainly enjoy it, because all the stories I pulled from the blog are ones that have been very popular with readers. Star Trek fans will probably enjoy the Saga of Spongebob Vegas Pants -- I can say this with certainty, because I've read it at conventions, and the crowd always loves it.

      Is this just a cut-n-paste from my site? A "dead tree" version of WWdN?

      No.

      I took the stories from the weblog, and I rewrote them. I think I've matured as a writer since they were first written, and I've rebuilt them. I had the technology to make them faster, better, stronger.

      They are also illustrated by my pal Ben, who is an OUTSTANDING artist. The illustrations really lend an extra dimension to the reading experience.

      If you're one of those people who has some sort of primal need to hate me, and everything I ever do, (please note: Wil != Wesley Crusher) I doubt anything in this book is going to change your mind about anything. (As a matter of fact, I doubt that anything I do at all will change your mind. That's why I read at +5.)

      But if you are curious, you can always take a look at my website, and read some of the stuff there. If you like what you see, there's a good chance you'll like this book.

      Of course, here is the ObBuy link, and, uh, I guess I'm supposed to scream "OMFG DANSIG BARFUT IS TEH FUTAR!!11" for some reason that currently eludes me.

      . . . but back in my day, we would have said "0/\/\fG! |>@/\/c!nG b@r3f00+ !5 +3h /~0Xx0rX, d00d!!!11"
    2. Re:Why hasn't he posted yet? by Om242 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Honestly, Wil...

      The only thing the Geeks want you to write about is your makeout session with Ashley Judd in the episode titled "The Game".

      That, my friend, was when your stardom peaked. :)

      ++Om

    3. Re:Why hasn't he posted yet? by geekwife · · Score: 1

      Regarding joyous teenage days....

      I remember that the highlight of my first trip to Disneyworld (back in the late 80's) had nothing to do with the parks, and everything to do with meeting Wil Wheaton on the Mexico ride at Epcot.

      I remember noticing this really goofy guy (sorry, Wil, but you *were*) behind my sisters and me on the ride, and not realizing just who it was until we all got off. I still have the autograph somewhere.

      You made a teenage geek very happy. Thank you.

      --
      "Choosy browsers choose .gif!"
  32. Wasn`t he a Cthulhu cultist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that Wil was a character in some stories about cthulhu and stuff. (alt.sex.cthulhu)
    I didn`t know he was in star trek too. He must really kick ass there, I mean, with his almost infinite physical sthrenght and ability to change form at will. ?!

  33. RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first saw the title of this book I thought it might be a biography of Stallman. The first time I saw him talk he was barefoot and he danced around the room as he talked.

  34. Re:A geek? He should be claiming instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PPSSSHHHHHTTTT

    OpenBSD on an iBook maybe.

  35. self-deprecating humor is old and annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not cute and 'clever' anymore.

    1. Re:self-deprecating humor is old and annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Trolling, which had NEVER been cute or clever.

  36. the thirty-something actor and writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words he's an unemployed has been.

  37. Who is he? by daemonc · · Score: 0, Funny

    No, seriously. I used to watch Star Trek: TNG occassionaly, even liked it a bit. But for the life of me, I can't remember anything about his character. Can someone refresh my memory?

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    1. Re:Who is he? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      He played the snotty little whizzkid who managed to get into everybody's hair and save the Enterprice at tyhe same time... and no, I didn't particulary like his character.

      Then again, I have found TNG to be all but filled with onedimensinal characters and all too simple, often recycled plots... even if Troi - in her non-standard Starfleet uniform - fetured in a a couple of boyhood dreams.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:Who is he? by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.imdb.com/Name?Wheaton,+Wil
      http://www.wilwheaton.net
      http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wil_Wheaton
      http://slashdot.org/~CleverNickName/journal


      That should get you going. ;-)

      --

      As with the sun's light
      My mom was magnificent
      Unquestionable
    3. Re:Who is he? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wesley Crusher was the boy on Star Trek, the son of Doctor Beverly crusher (the younger doctor from the 3rd season on), whose father was killed by a painful choice Picard made to save more lives. Wesley Crusher was a 16 year old character written by a 60 year old man to resemble how 10 year old boys looked at the world in the 50's. Ironically, Wil Wheaton played, in Stand By Me, a 10 year old character in the 50's written by a 60 year old man to resemble how a 16 year old boy looks at the world in the 80's.

      Wesley Crusher had a few flirting romantic spats with girls, was nearly executed for walking on the grass, helmed the starship through far to many dangerous encounters, and was eventually canned due to near universal revilement of his character. Quite frankly, Wesley Crusher was insulting to the teenage audience of the show, as he was written with all of the deep understanding of the turmoils of youth shown in "The Family Circus". If it were set in modern times, the writers would have given Wesley Yu-Gi-oh cards.

      His character walked off with the traveler after 4 seasons, never to be seen from again (until Nemesis, which I haven't yet seen). The void left by that departure was shortly thereafter filled by Lt. Barkley, another character whose sole purpose was to have blundering errors of judgement.

      Wil Wheaton, on the other hand, is a very personable guy. He's honest and open, and his acting in Stand by Me and Toy Soldiers reflects this. He's also a nice guy in person, as friends working at A Wrinkle in Time have said. He's done his penance, and deserves to be taken as a serious actor outside of the Trek universe.

    4. Re:Who is he? by lhbtubajon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not exactly.

      1) Wil quit the show, he wasn't canned.

      2) His character was seen after season four. He came back for an excellent season seven episode.

      However, good insightful comments about the writing of his characters. I never quite looked at the inverse relationship of his characters in Star Trek and Stand By Me. Roddenberry really didn't have anything to say with the Wesley character. He seemed to just want him around to be some kind of superior innocence.

      I wonder how Gene reacted to the public irritation with his characterization of Mr. Crusher.

      Anyone know? CleverNickName?

    5. Re:Who is he? by ToadSprocket · · Score: 1

      Dude, were you going for the free "William F'ing Shatner" shirt or what?

      --


      If this article confuses you, don't worry. It was posted yesterday in a much clearer fashion.
    6. Re:Who is he? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      I can't speak on the Roddenberry thing, but I just thought of something regarding the public irritation thing. Seasons 1 & 2 are just plain awful, and are also pretty Wesley-heavy (or at least heavy with bad Wesley moments). But that's not the character's fault or Wil Wheaton's fault, it's just because those two years are so unwatchably bad overall, especially in comparison with what came later (i.e., good writing). The Wesley stuff later on was much better, and I think that gets overlooked because everybody remembers the awfulness of the Wesley character in seasons 1 & 2 (overlooking for some reason the equally-embarassing antics of Data, Worf and Geordi at various points).

      It's a theory, anyway.

  38. Hmm. by Firehawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never had the particular honor to have been able to speak with him in person or on an online forum, but I've read over some of his comments and blog posts in the past. This book sounds like one I need to add to my list in the near future!

    Mr. Wheaton has always come across to me as being an honest, true techie with a Clue. The fact that he speaks his mind without hesitation only makes me respect him that much more; a guy could easily dig himself into quite a hole with as many ears listening as he has.

    I wonder, though, if this is the beginning of a new wave of publications-- dead-tree compilations of blogs? I'm not sure what I feel about that. For every good blog, there're a few hundred that are a total waste of electrons.

  39. A message from Capt. Picard: by gpinzone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Shut up, Wesley!

    1. Re:A message from Capt. Picard: by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Gee... Do you suppose he doesn't hear that every day or so?
      My wife and I both thought it was very funny on the show, that first time. Like everyone, we found the Wussley character to be an irritant, and the line was an obvious acknowledgement of fan annoyance.
      He did a good job with an annoying character, and takes the ribbing like a man. It's been what, 10 years now? Perhaps we could let it drop? Acting is still his career, near as I can tell. It would be nice if he could get away from Wussley so he can work again.

    2. Re:A message from Capt. Picard: by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if it wasn't for me, he'd be starring in major blockbusters right now. I hope he can forgive me for holding him back.

  40. Some of the scripts Wil has done have been bad by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wil's a great actor. I remember him from way back when in Stand By Me, and even from The Last Starfighter. But the worst piece of writing I've seen in nearly any program was a TNG line where he meets Riker in the hallways of the Enterprise-D and says:

    "Can I walk with you?"

    Gahhh, I still think about it and it makes me cringe...but some folks could mistake the bad writing for bad acting. His revival is much welcomed for me, and that book will probably be an interesting read.

    1. Re:Some of the scripts Wil has done have been bad by tgd · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I had no recollection of him being in The Last Starfighter... so I went to IMDB. Says he was in the movie, but his scenes were deleted.

      What part of the movie was he still in? I may have to dig out the old video tape and go looking...

  41. We're all envious of you too, you tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up and get ready for work. I want my Big Mac to be HOT today, ass. Don't make me call you out in front of your supervisor again.

  42. A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by stanwirth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the review of Dancing Barefoot:

    The best is Houses -- although it sometimes ranges into maudlin territory, it is also the most courageous writing in the book. Wheaton's generation has been raised on a diet of pop culture and cynicism, and it's invigorating -- if somewhat startling -- to see someone of that generation openly expressing such feelings of devotion and despair.

    Startling, but not unique in this generation. David Eggers' memoir A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius: Based on a True Story specialises in this style of self-revealing, self-referential, reflective, intelligent, witty prose. One can't help but notice the similarities in the relationship between Eggers and his brother Toph, and the relationship Wheaton has with his stepson. While reveling in the part of himself that will always be a boy brought out by the younger (the child is father of the man, and all that) he also can reflect on the call to greater responsibility required by the relationship, accepted somewhat reluctantly.

    Eggers started a whole (and very good) imprimatur with a group of authors and artists who also transcend the pop culture they were raised on. Good Stuff and worth reading!

  43. Re:This book is irrelevant, it will be assimilated by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Informative
    If anyone can find a dead-tree merchant who's taking pre-orders for (or acknowledges the existence of) books by Wil Wheaton, post it here? Please?
    There's a link in the review, but just to make it easier for you, here's the monolithpress order page

    There ya go.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  44. The book got trashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It got a "7" for crying out loud!

    Since 95% of all reviews get a "9", a "7" screams "Run away! Run away!"

  45. One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by Maul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just a thought, but I think that some of the younger Star Trek: TNG viewers might have even been JEALOUS of Wesley Crusher.

    He is smart for his age (as many teenage Star Trek watchers were, or at least tink they were), and I think it might be easy for some younger viewers who were around Wesley's age at the time to relate to him.

    However, the kids watching the show lived in the world of Junior High and High School, possible where they were made fun of for being nerds, trekkies, etc... whereas Wesley lived on the Enterprise and got to have at least a few cool adventures.

    So I think it was easy for a young Trek fan to wonder why they couldn't be in a "cool" situation like Wesley was. So they were jealous of him.
    Some people might have also been jealous of a Wil Wheaton for being able to play Wesley on Star Trek and be on the Enterprise set rather than in school.

    Personally, I'm jealous of Reginald Barclay. Yet another crazy, incompetent mental case with a better job than I have.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by krb · · Score: 1

      This is just a thought, but I think that some of the younger Star Trek: TNG viewers might have even been JEALOUS of Wesley Crusher.

      agreed. plus, he got to make out with Ashley Judd in one episode.

      that had to be pretty OK, right...

      --
    2. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Naw, I think people disliked the Wesley character because he never became more than a pure-white (as in clean), ultra-good, super-smart boot-lick, making him completely unrealistic, and as a result, incredibly irritating! And that had everything to do with the writers... they never developed the character, and so, in my mind, he always remained two-dimensional. Yes, they could have dealt actual issues using the Wesley character (as Wheaton mentions in the A-V Onion interview he did), they could have made him interesting and multi-faceted, but they didn't, which is unfortunate, both for the audience and for Wheaton himself.

    3. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember that episode where he accidentally incinerated one of his classmates in a plasma stream while performing an illegal manuver with his fleet?

      It's times like that I wish Star Trek was more like Starship Troopers. =)

    4. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

      He was bland and was given bad lines. Don't blame Wheaton. They all started like that... however, nobody seem to want to flesh him out.

      People hated Wesley because he he was either the original cause of the problem (some experiment gone bad, stepping on grass), or he was the only one who could solve it.

      I'd be inclined to disagree with the "geek jealousy" theory by just arguing that Wesley was a bland, or useless character. However, by that argument, I can't understand why Riker isn't as equally reviled.

      I used to joke that the three things EVERYONE hated were Barney, Wesley Crusher, and GE Smith from SNL. It's almost a truism.

    5. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      They hated him because he was such a kiss ass even when he was defiant. It made everyone think that geeks his age had no sense of reality or balls.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    6. Re:One of the reasons I think people hated Wesley: by jishcat · · Score: 0

      I used to joke that the three things EVERYONE hated were Barney, Wesley Crusher, and GE Smith from SNL. It's almost a truism.

      At the very least, everyone despises one of these three. For me, it's GE Smith. I used to feel like vomitting when he would make those faces while he played his guitar. I used to hate barney, till I found out it would give me a half hour break from the kids screaming.

  46. Re:This book is irrelevant, it will be assimilated by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

    That'll teach me to skim reviews. Also provides a reminder that there are more than two online booksellers on the planet. D'oh. Interestingly, the entire library section of Wheaton's blog site links to Amazon, and the books in "What I'm Currently Reading" and "Essential Computer and Geek Books" are...intruiguing.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
  47. Head-geek? by dougmc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    a kind of affable head-geek.
    I've seen the term `head geek' before -- it referred to the leader or alpha geek. I'm not sure how I'd apply it to Mr Wheaton, though.

    It's neat that Wil has `geek' tendancies, and it's not often that celebrities have blogs (but becoming more common), but he has much to learn before we can dub him `head-geek'.

    Unless he's locked in a closet with my grandma and a tricorder, of course :)

  48. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give this man an "Insightful" plz.

  49. Wesley "Weener boy" Crusher must die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From: Brad Crick (bjcri1@mfs04.cc.monash.edu.au)
    Subject: Wesley "Weener boy" Crusher must die a slow painful death
    This is the only article in this thread
    View: Original Format
    Newsgroups: alt.wesley.crusher.die.die.die
    Date: 1997/05/10

    Wesley (Weener-boy) Crusher tickles my soft palate causing me to expel my
    stomach contents every time he appears on screen. I spent a lot of
    potentially good Next Gen episodes barfing my guts out.

    Signed, Luke

    As a long term user of Next Gen, I feel it is in my best interests to make
    every one aware of Wesley (Weener boy) Crusher's whingeing whining nature.
    His schmalzy attempts at participation in bridge crew activity, when lets
    face it, HE DOESN'T BELONG THERE!! They make him into some hero genius boy
    able to save the entire crew of the Enterprise but his Will Wheaton
    pathetic acting he doesn't get beyond the intelligence or knowledge of
    Gordie LaChance of Stand By Me fame

    Signed, Kieran

  50. My unbiased opinion... by ClevaNickName · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is the best book ever written, hands down. I can't wait to buy a copy for everyone I know.

  51. Wil Wheaton is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another wussy liberal commie

    1. Re:Wil Wheaton is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes he is

    2. Re:Wil Wheaton is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he's not. He's more than that. He's a liberal commie with name recognition and an audience.

      which is more than I can say for you.

  52. I wonder if the Sci Fi Channel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would ever try to pick him up for one of their home grown series. Probably something space vessel related, though. I assume that his slashdot/internet popularity might be able to give it a boost, as long as the script is good, that is.

    1. Re:I wonder if the Sci Fi Channel... by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Informative

      SciFi is trying to get away from 'space vessel' shows. One of the reasons they dropped Farscape. The current management doesn't like space vessel shows. They prefer quality fare like 'Tremors: The Series'. And John Edwards.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  53. I'll admit it... by sirgoran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought he was good in Stand By Me. But the thing that bugged me about Wesley, was they made him into such a whiney, little snot on ST:TNG. I was also bothered by the fact that this "Advanced" and "Modern" version of Trek still treated him as a "dumb kid." Despite calling him a "boy genius" in the opening teasers prior to the shows launch.

    Had they written a better part for him, and treated him like an equal, I'm sure that fans would have liked him more.

    But with that aside, I have to give credit to him for being able to take the good with the bad in stride. He's still able to look back on Trek and Smile, and still able to smile when fans face him and say "I really hated Wesley."

    How many of the rest of us would be able to do the same without giving folks a big "F*** You?"

    I for one can say, while not a "fan" of Wesley, I can give kudos to Mr. Weaton for hanging in there with a bit of class.

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
    1. Re:I'll admit it... by Deagol · · Score: 1
      But the thing that bugged me about Wesley, was they made him into such a whiney, little snot on ST:TNG. I was also bothered by the fact that this "Advanced" and "Modern" version of Trek still treated him as a "dumb kid." Despite calling him a "boy genius" in the opening teasers prior to the shows launch.

      May have been the writers' bias.

      I recently finished watching Season 5 of the DVD collection. I always watch the bonus materials at the end of the last DVD. In nearly all of them, Patric Stewart or someone alludes to the fact that having a child actor on the normal cast wasn't something many felt would be good. Gene admitted himself that he was reliving a part of his childhood image through the Wesley character, so the character was going to be included.

      I dunno -- maybe the adult cast/crew never liked having a kid on set and the writing reflected that. Given how stellar Wheaton's performance in Stand By Me was (much better than the late River Phoenix, I thought), I can't believe anything other than bad writing was responsible for the hatred of Wesley.

      On a side note, is anyone else irritated by the total lack of balance in the interviews on the DVD sets? My favorite actor (Spiner) hardly gets any screen time, while my least favorite (Sirtis) seems to dominate, getting about as much time as Stewart or Frakes (if not more than the latter).

  54. Thought he played that bald French bastard Picard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure Wil didn't play that bald French surrender monkey coward Captain Picard????

  55. Get even by fobbman · · Score: 1

    Cast Wil in the movie, and then cut him from it during post-production.

    1. Re:Get even by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and then I'll be known as
      Big_f'n_Monkey_Bird

      Patti Smith, Talking Heads... at least he likes decent music.

  56. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream

    I remember this from a Propaganda song; do you know the author?

    1. Re:Your sig by daemonc · · Score: 1

      Edgar Allen Poe, of course. It's from one of his poetry books.

      --
      All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    2. Re:Your sig by daemonc · · Score: 1

      You may have also heard the line "Feels like I'm sinking... into a dream within a dream" from the song "Sweat" from TOOL's Opiate.

      --
      All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  57. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If the recent Iraq war had proven anything, it's that nobody cares what celebrities have to say.

    Thank you.

  58. dork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will wheaton is such a Fruit. I was so happy when they cut his scenes from Nemesis. He acts like he is god. What a dork.

  59. JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by interociter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    At this point, Mr. Wheaton has become THE Geek. He has some of the strongest geek credentials in the subculture. Let's do the list:
    • Crewmember on the USS Enterprise
    • Codes and maintains his own website
    • Uses Linux instead of Windows on his home machines
    • Worked on the Video Toaster
    • Obsessive blogger
    • Posts on Slashdot
    • Free Speech activist
    • Frequent (but not frequent enough) guest and sometimes guest host of The Screen Savers
    • Host of Arena on G4
    • Gamer, both video and role-playing
    What more can you ask for? Seems to me that Wil Wheaton has become the shining star of Geek Culture, the Ubergeek. He's both articulate and telegenic, and has a deep understanding of technology's role in society. Should Wil Wheaton decide to run for office, I'd vote for him in a minute.
    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    1. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... but does he have a girlfriend?

    2. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by Eisenstein · · Score: 1

      Obviously he doesn't cater the Furries, so he can't be the Übergeek.

    3. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to deduct geek points for the wife & kids thing

    4. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by interociter · · Score: 1

      You've totally lost me. I'm assuming you meant to say "cater TO the Furries", although "cater the Furries" evokes some bizzare and humorous mental images. Is there some connotation to the term "Ubergeek" that I'm unaware of?

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    5. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Worked on the Video Toaster

      Well, he worked for NewTek promoting the Toaster. I don't think he worked on the Toaster itself.

      Host of Arena on G4

      Not anymore. Read here to find out why.

      Arena is now hosted by a smug Brit and a jarhead -- not that I have any strong feelings about it or anything...

      Schwab

    6. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by naarok · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, none of these things (except maybe for having worked on the Video Toaster (I don't know what he did on it)) qualifies as Ubergeek.

      Being a TV actor has nothing to do with being a geek (except maybe negatively).

      Coding and maintaining a website does not provide any geek status anymore.

      Using Linux instead of Windows definately adds to his geek score.

      In my mind, being a blogger of any sort is a count against geekness (it is too mainstream).

      Posts on slashdot may or may not add to his geek score.

      Free speech is good, but unrelated to geekness.

      Again, being on TV doesn't related to geekness

      Being a video and role-playing gamer can add to geekness.

      To conclude, he may very well be a geek, but to be an Ubergeek, you have to be doing something technical that few others could. Linus Torvelds was an Ubergeek when he started Linux. Now he is a Demigod. Bruce Schneier's security/crypto work makes him an Ubergeek. ect.

    7. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by interociter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Being a TV actor has nothing to do with being a geek (except maybe negatively).
      No, but being directly involved with the production of Star Trek adds geek points.

      Coding and maintaining a website does not provide any geek status anymore.
      Actually, it does. Sure, anyone with the desire can create a website, but writing the code yourself using php instead of Front Page puts you far ahead of 90% of the personal sites on the web. Keep in mind that 90% of humanity still see computers as scary boxes, and writing any sort of code as advanced wizardry.

      being a blogger of any sort is a count against geekness
      Again, no. Sure, anyone who wants to can do a blog, but it's the wanting to that adds a few points. See above.

      Free speech is good, but unrelated to geekness.
      Agree, Free Speech is not limited to geeks, but it has always been a major facet of geek culture.

      Again, being on TV doesn't related to geekness
      Agree in general, but guesting on and guest-hosting "The Screen Savers" implies a level of technological sophistication. Being on TSS and ST:TNG aren't like being on "Charles In Charge".

      Let's try another comparison: Wheaton vs Shatner.

      Both were on Star Trek. To avoid 30 responses about the relative importance of the actors to the Trek universe, let's just say both were on the show and call it even.

      Both have websites and blogs. Wheaton codes his from scratch using php, does all the design and content himself, and plays a certain role in the daily maintainance of the server itself. Shatner pays someone. Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      I'd assume that Shatner has a PC. I have no idea what it runs, but I'd guess Windows. Wheaton proudly runs Linux. Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      Wheaton worked on the Video Toaster. Shatner worked on TJ Hooker. Maybe Wil didn't lead a Dev team, but Shatner's never done anything more technological than shout "Phasers on stun!" Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      Wheaton posts on Slashdot. Unless Shatner lurks, I seriously doubt he's reading this. Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      Wheaton hosted Arena and guest-hosted The Screen Savers. Shatner hosted Iron Chef. Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      Wheaton plays D&D, Illuminati, Grand Theft Auto, and collects vintage Atari 2600 games. Shatner did William Shatner's Splat Attack. Shatner's involvement in gaming consists of doing voices for Star Trek games and cashing the check. Check out his filmography and search for "VG". Geekvantage: Wheaton.

      Final Summation: Wheaton

      OK, I'll grant you that Wil's no Linus Torvalds, Richard Stallman, or Steve Wozniak, but he's no newbie either. I'd stack him up next to Neal Stevenson or Bruce Sterling on geek points. And if you wanted to put someone on Crossfire to represent geek culture as a whole, who better?

      Finally, here's Wil Wheaton's geek code, pulled off his web site. You be the judge.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    8. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Agreed. To be an ubergeek one must do things that ensure one never sees the light of day. Not that I'm biased, I just happen to be friends with several people from the M.I.T. Grad school program.

      At least, I was last time they came out of their labs. They'll probably re-emerge around Christmas time, and I'll have to tell them all about the Iraqi war.

    9. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Funny
      What more can you ask for? Seems to me that Wil Wheaton has become the shining star of Geek Culture, the Ubergeek. He's both articulate and telegenic, and has a deep understanding of technology's role in society. Should Wil Wheaton decide to run for office, I'd vote for him in a minute.

      I'd turn gay and marry him.

    10. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Seeing today how much time and passion you have put into defending Wil Wheaton and defining Nerd-dom, I would say that you, sir, are the Uber-geek.

      I doubt that even Wil Wheaton regards Wil Wheaton as highly as you do. Stand Proud, son!

    11. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's a new one. Celebrity P.R. drones on Slashdot masquerading as acutal users.

    12. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by interociter · · Score: 1
      I'll take it all as a compliment. I'm spending time on it because I'm polishing a perl script today. There are 10 minute stretches while I wait for it to get to the interesting part where I have nothing to do but watch a logfile tail, so today, I have the time.

      As far as passion, I find myself in a strange situation. See, I'm not a Star Trek fan (gasp). I had a roommate who was really into it, so I know a lot about it, and I find the subculture itself fascinating. As far as the actual shows, I raise my voice in a heartfelt "Meh."

      I, like so many others, originally went to WWDN to mock. After ten minutes of reading, I found that Wil was not a generic washed-up child actor, but an intelligent, articulate individual who really knows how to write. A few months later, I went to my first Star Trek convention where I got to meet him. Back in my DJ days, I met a lot of Rock Stars. I can honestly say that Wil Wheaton is one of the coolest, most down-to-earth celebrities I've ever met. It's between him and Dave Grohl for the top billing in my book. I wish more people in the public eye would take their cues from Wil Wheaton.

      And no, I'm nerdy as all get out, but I'm no Ubergeek. I'm Just Another Perl Hacker. Wow, that was a pretty geeky reference. Maybe it's true...

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    13. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by interociter · · Score: 1
      You win. Uh, you might want to discuss it with Wil first. I think he covered this on his web site. Either way, I'm pretty sure he has a strong opinion on the subject.

      --
      Interociter
      -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    14. Re:JUST a Geek? Try Ubergeek. by naarok · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying he isn't a geek (well maybe I was, but you've convinced me he is). What I am saying is that he definately isn't an Ubergeek.

      I still deny that geekness and blogging are related in any way. In fact I question how a true Ubergeek would have time to waste on blogging. I guess this is just personal opinion, but being a pretty serious geek myself (In fact I have been labeled an Ubergeek by others), I don't see the point in blogging. Do something, stop wasting time sharing your thoughts, show them in code or something physical.

  60. Wil Wheaton Superstar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you've followed the recent phenomenon of blogging at all, you've probably run across the weblog (online journal) of Wil Wheaton

    • You've hated him in his role as annoying whiny kid on ST:TNG.
    • You've hated him in his role as annoying whiny ensign on ST:TNG.
    • Face it, you've just hated him.

    Now, you can hate his blog, too. That's right! Wil Wheaton as Wil Wheaton the annoying nerd with a blog. No Trek. No bald Captain to fawn over. No deus ex machina plot to rewrite as a deus ex Wesley. Nothing but 'net. Tune in and bring a vomit bucket!
  61. Flamebait? by tfriedlich · · Score: 1

    How was that flamebait? I happen to think Wil is great. I read his blog once a day and even have a wwdn mousepad (it was a gift). You knock someone down for making a joke? That was hardly flamebait.

  62. Idiot mods. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Jumping Judas on a pogo stick! How was that flaimbait? A joke? Yes. Not your kind of humor? Quite possibly. But a flame? No.

    Stop being so damned twitchy and THINK before you moderate.

    I wouldn't classify the post I was replying to as flaimbait, either. But that's me.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  63. "Public Persona" by windowpain · · Score: 1

    This oft used term is redundant. Your persona is the face you show to the public.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  64. wil wheaton on something awful by violently_ill · · Score: 0, Troll

    i would rather have my eyes gouged-out with a rusty fork than have to submit to have wil wheaton as the representative of all of geekdom. all the ubergeeks i know consider wil wheaton to be something of a wiener monkey, and if you don't agree with us you should read something awful's article:

    http://somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=1123

    or

    http://somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=972

    wil wheaton should not be writing books, or blogging, or existing, or in any other way influencing my culture. and he should especially not be joining my green party and tainting it with his unholy presence.

  65. William F---ing Shatner? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Why would he call William Shatner "William F---ing Shatner"? What is that... "William F dash dash dash ing Shatner"? That doesn't make a whole fuckload of sense. Is this fuckup from the book or the reviewer?

    1. Re:William F---ing Shatner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a troll, or just slow in the head?

      It's called censoring, it says FUCKING in the book, but the reviewer didn't want to offend anyone so he changed it to F---ing.

    2. Re:William F---ing Shatner? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      It's called censoring, it says FUCKING in the book, but the reviewer didn't want to offend anyone so he changed it to F---ing.

      Well, in that case, he needs to say that his comments are not from the book. If the book says "fucking", then he should also write "fucking". Since this site isn't a Disney owned site (or is it by now?), the word "fucking" isn't going to offend anyone.

  66. Wil in Last Starfighter by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

    You can see a blurry shot of him in the background toward the beginning of the film. If memory serves me, it's when Louis is wearing a helmet and playing in the trailer park.

  67. Re:Pro-Wrestling? No, Boxing by embobo · · Score: 1

    Try Pro-boxing. Undefeated in one bout with Barney .

  68. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? by IT+IS+WHAT+IT+IS · · Score: 0

    YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?

  69. People aren't very nice are they? by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    *looks at the replies to this and other posts*

    Wow, people suck. I hope these are just a fringe element, and not a representative sample of the current slashdot population.

    So for a different perspective, i thought Wesley Crusher was an annoying git, even though i'm a bit jealous of the name recognition (better to rule in hell than serve in heaven or some such.) I know very little about you, but you seem like an okay guy based off the posts here. Cool! You've got a book out! Wish i could do that :) Hope it does well!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  70. Really dislike Wil Wheaton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I never had a problem until I his reasoning for leaving Star Trek on his website. He lists the reason being that he had wanted to star in the movie Valmont, but he wasn't allowed to since Gene Roddenbury had died and after his death the management of the show changed to assholes.


    What strikes me as odd about that is that Valmont came out in 1989, and Gene Roddenbury didn't die until 1991. Boy wonder is a bad liar.

  71. Re:WIL HAS AIDS FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No! I am the clit commander!

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. I can't be the only one by Desperado · · Score: 1

    original captain of the Enterprise, referred to repeatedly as William F---ing Shatner.

    I thought someone would have noted that William F'ing Shatner played Capt. Kirk who was not the first commander of the Enterprise having been preceeded by Capts. Robert April and Christopher Pike.

    --
    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
  74. Yep that's it.... by StandardCell · · Score: 1

    Even I had to go back and look. Since this is a movie that was pretty dear to me, I can still appreciated it simply because it was Wil's foray into Sci-Fi, albeit light fare.

    1. Re:Yep that's it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [The Last Starfigher] is a movie that was pretty dear to me

      I liked it, too. Apparently, we aren't the only ones.

  75. So many A.C.s by Roughy · · Score: 1

    So, how does one person find so much time to write so much negative?

    I'd love to see the IP log for all those entries.

  76. Gene's feelings on the haters. by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how Gene reacted to the public irritation with his characterization of Mr. Crusher.

    It hurt him a great deal.

    Wesley was Gene's idealized self. Wesley was the kid that Gene couldn't be, and he hated it that the fans, who he loved, hated this character so much.

    I remember once, we were at the same convention, and there was a group of fans chanting someting like "kill wesley" or "wesley sucks" or something equally intelligent.

    Gene, who was about a thousand at the time, and not exactly spry, stormed up on the stage, grabbed the microphone, and said something along the lines of, "All you people just STFU! I make this show the way I want to! I don't make it for you, I make it for me, and if you don't like it, you can watch something else!"

    There was a stunned silence, and then applause from the few majority of people who didn't share the opinion of the haters.

    It was awesome.

    I know that Gene respected and appreciated the fans, just like all of us do . . . but there's only so much a guy can take, you know?

    Just read this thread at 1, and you'll get an inkling of about 1/10E6 of what I put up with for 15 years . . . and I was just an actor on the damn thing. I didn't even create it.

    I know now, as a writer, that criticism of writing stings much worse than criticism of acting. The writing is much more personal, you know?

    And thanks for setting the record straight on my history with TNG. :)

  77. about blogs... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    I don't really see what's so great about blogs. Sure, I like the idea of /. where you can discuss mutual interests, but as far as randomly surfing the net seeing what different people did in their day or what they have to think doesn't appeal to me. Maybe i'm missing something or maybe i'm not, either way I'm not really into blogs.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:about blogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyeurism and exhibitionism are very very common sexual.. uumm.. traits. Many people share those traits and they often appear in strange ways such as exhibitionists creating blogs and voyeurs reading them. Blogging. It's all about the sexual repression of deviant sexual desires.

  78. EPCOT 1989 by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember noticing this really goofy guy . . .

    Heh. Some things never change.

    You made a teenage geek very happy. Thank you.

    That's awesome. I always try to be not a dick when people ask me for autographs and stuff . . . but when I was a teenager . . . well, I didn't just look goofy. I *was* goofy: insecure, awkward, and anxious. I could have easily let my insecurities get the better of me, and acted like some of the AC's here. I'm glad I didn't.

    I was at Disneyworld then with my best friend Darin. It was for his 18th birthday. I was 16, and we thought we were SO COOL (nod to Teen Girl Squad) being all the way in Mysterious Florida . . . I have nothing but wonderful memories from that vacation (even though I lost my nerve and didn't kiss the cute girl while I was there.)

    It's awesome to me that you have a good memory, and I'm part of it. Thank you for sharing it. :)

    1. Re:EPCOT 1989 by rune2 · · Score: 1

      Well that's just great.... I had to pick Universal Studios in 1989 instead of Epcot. Instead of meeting Wil I got mocked by the talking Night Rider car... ;-)

  79. Word of the Day: Atticism by serutan · · Score: 1

    Atticism: Concise and elegant writing.