Slashdot Mirror


What Subnotebooks Work Best w/ Linux?

elliotj asks: "With the widespread adoption of WIFI, I'm finding more and more places where I'd like to use the Internet on the road. All I really need is a linux command line to run SSH, links, and a few other things. What I'm looking for is a very lightweight subnotebook with a long battery life, quick sleep/wake times, that can run Linux and WIFI. I've looked at the Sony picturebook line and the Toshiba Librettos. Both are sweet machines, but have more features and are more expensive than I really need. Are there any cost effective options out there?"

71 comments

  1. The Zaurus? by nemui-chan · · Score: 5, Informative

    i know the Zaurus isnt really a subnotebook, but it falls between the subnote book and the pda category. It already runs linux, is easy to develop for, and is easy to port existing linux applications to. If you know QT, its also easy to integrate existing apps with the GUI that comes preinstalled. Best of all, there are open source projects to replace the OS of the Zaurus with an open source version. Also, sharp's technical support is very good, and the staff very friendly, and they usually hang out on #zaurus on irc.freenet.net

    1. Re:The Zaurus? by ErnieD · · Score: 1

      Took the words right out of my mouth. Don't forget the fact that there are WiFi CF cards available for the Zaurus for around $70 last I checked. Not a bad little setup, IMO.

    2. Re:The Zaurus? by zfalcon · · Score: 1
      Take a look at the Japanese Zaurus C700. 640x480 screen + keyboard in a sweet pda.

      $700 for an english translated version at Dynamism

      $550 for a japanese version at conics but it's really easy to change the locale to english!)

      A review at the gadgeteer

  2. As I said before by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

    I gots a friend who has a fujitsu lifebook. He runs Debian, and it is mad crazy.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:As I said before by Longstaff · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll have to second that. I picked up a Lifebook P2120 just under a month ago. The thing rocks. 6 hours of battery life with the high cap batt - 12 hours if I swapped out the DVD/CDRW for another batt. Integrated wireless. 5.1 channel digital audio. To top it off, it only weighs 3.4lbs. Makes my 12" ibook look like a big, bloated beast.

    2. Re:As I said before by LunaticLeo · · Score: 1

      I have one as well.

      Do you have Linux installed on it with ACPI (aka suspend/resume mem or disk) working?

      --
      -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
    3. Re:As I said before by Longstaff · · Score: 1

      I have linux on it, but I've been working on too many other projects to play with acpi, yet.

  3. iBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get yourself an apple ibook... it has a very efficient battery. OSX is BSD based... if you don't like that then run over to yellowdoglinux.com and pick up a copy.

    1. Re:iBook! by sirmikester · · Score: 1

      I think that would be too expensive an option, but maybe an used one with yellowdog will do...

      --
      In linux libertas
    2. Re:iBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too expensive? The 12" iBook starts at $999. And another thing, why run yellowdog on it. I know the original poster said he wants Linux, but OSX does all of that just as well as Linux ever could.

      SSH - Got it!
      Links - I've got it running on my powerbook right now courtesy Fink
      Quick sleep/awake times - 1 second flat. I've never seen any other laptop sleep/wake that fast
      Long battery life - I get at least 3.5 to 4 hours out of my powerbook
      WIFI - Oh yeah, that's built in.

    3. Re:iBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the original poster said he wants Linux, but OSX does all of that just as well as Linux ever could.

      Full source code - oops.

    4. Re:iBook! by sirmikester · · Score: 1

      maybe he doesn't want to pay 99-199 dollars every time apple decides to make an incremental release?

      --
      In linux libertas
    5. Re:iBook! by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Full source code - oops.

      Oops is right. You can find the source code here.

    6. Re:iBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off your high horse. Jaguar (MacOS 10.2) cost $129. If you worked for the government or were a student, it was half that. If you were a teacher, it was free. Besides, M$ charges for all of their "new" OS's too...A quick search of WinXP at Amazon show a $149 price tag. But I forgot, Microsoft give you those weekly (seems almost daily, nowadays) service packs for free.

    7. Re:iBook! by sirmikester · · Score: 1

      I don't use microsoft, my debian updates are free.

      --
      In linux libertas
    8. Re:iBook! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      maybe he doesn't want to pay 99-199 dollars every time apple decides to make an incremental release?

      How much does Microsoft charge for an Incremental Release? Windows 2003 just came out, time to hit the pocketbook again.

      -Brent
    9. Re:iBook! by Lazaru5 · · Score: 1

      He can still run Linux on it. $999 for a 12" iBook is a good deal with any OS.

      --

      --
      My comments and opinions completely reflect those of anyone and anything I am remotely associated with.
    10. Re:iBook! by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Darwin is not MacOS X. There's a distinct lack of Aqua sourcecode, for instance.

    11. Re:iBook! by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. It's certainly not Linux, by any stretch.

      But there's a heck of lot of code out there. Supposedly there's a fairly active community contributing code back to Darwin.

      And they're starting to release their source to other things, though the selection is pretty darn skimpy.

    12. Re:iBook! by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1
      if you don't like that then run over to yellowdoglinux.com and pick up a copy.

      Or better, just grab a debian ppc netinst iso, and install away. (Debian tends to have more software built for ppc than yellowdog.)
      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    13. Re:iBook! by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      the ibook is unfortunatly more expensive then many x86 solutions. i looked at getting an ibook until i noticed the cost of hp's and toshiba's after rebate was far below the cost of an imac and the features in the hp and toshiba where more for the buck

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    14. Re:iBook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We _were_ talking about Linux. Remember?

    15. Re:iBook! by trouser · · Score: 1

      The GUI is much faster too.

      My iBook really struggled with Aqua. Ok it's only the 500Mhz model, but resizing a window isn't that complicated.

      I installed YellowDog Linux. The GUI screams along, Linux desktops have come a long way since I last used them, and all the hardware is supported. The Airport works. It knows about the special screen brightness and volume adjustment keys. I can run OS9/OSX in MacOnLinux in a window on my Linux desktop. Multiple desktops ! Why doesn't Aqua support multiple desktops. Freeciv. Nethack. KSokoban. Is there a better Sokoban than KSokoban ?

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    16. Re:iBook! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      SP1 / 2 / 3 is all free. That is what 10.1.5 > 10.2 amounted to...

    17. Re:iBook! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      That is what 10.1.5 > 10.2 amounted to...

      You are sure about that? I've got an iMac, and an Intel box running Windows. I think I should probably know something about that.

      -Brent
    18. Re:iBook! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Service Packs from Microsoft being free? Yes. 10.1.5 to 10.2 upgrade free? No, it was $129. 10.2 was a service pack in my opinion... 10.1 series to 10.2 series. Just as 10.3 will be; only qusstion is how much will it bleed the Mac faithful of?

    19. Re:iBook! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      10.1.5 to 10.2 upgrade free? No, it was $129. 10.2 was a service pack in my opinion...

      From what I can tell there are more changes in 10.1.5 to 10.2 then there are between Windows 2000, and Windows 2003, yet that hasn't stopped Microsoft from charging for their service pack. Really, I mentioned before, I have an iMac. It is running 10.2. I know what the differences are, and the are more then a service pack.

      -Brent
    20. Re:iBook! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      If 10.1.5 to 10.2 was such a major jump, it would have garnered more than a minor revision number. Minor revision numbers amount to service packs when translating Unix style to Windows style.

    21. Re:iBook! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      If 10.1.5 to 10.2 was such a major jump, it would have garnered more than a minor revision number. Minor revision numbers amount to service packs when translating Unix style to Windows style.

      I think I just split a gut laughing. Did Apple run their versioning scheme past you first for your approval? Just in case you don't understand Apple's OS X versioning scheme, it is really quite simple. The 'X' in OS X is the roman numeral '10', as in 10.a.b. The 'a' is the major revision number, as in 10.1.b -> 10.2.b. That is like going from Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 in MS-speak. The 'b' is, not surprising, the patch level version number. This corresponds to a service pack in MS-speak.

      But like you said, you are an authority on versioning schemes. I'm sure that next time Steve needs a new versioning scheme he'll run it by you first to make sure that it is approved.

      HTH

      -Brent
    22. Re:iBook! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      ok... the generally accepted number scheme of anything UNIX related is as follows:

      The numbering scheme is relatively simple, and is in the format of three numbers separated by dots. The first number is the "major" revision number. The second is the "minor" revision number. And finally, the third is the "patch level" number.

      Taken from WindowMaker FAQ 1.11...

      http://www.windowmaker.org/faq-chapter1.html

      OS X 10.2.6 is actually redunant. OS X.2.6 or OS 10.2.6 is correct. After all, it's not pronounced OS 'ecks' but OS 'ten' if you want to get anal about it.

      But you knew that... right?

      Think about it... OS X/10 is the major revision, the giant leap from OS 9. 10.1 was the minor update to 10.0.x series. 10.1.1 > 10.1.2 etc were patches (not always sercurity related, but sometimes). Same for 10.2, it was just a small update to 10.1.5 except for the fact that it cost $129(US). 10.2.1 was a patch. same for 10.2.2 and 10.2.3 and 10.2.4 and 10.2.5 and 10.2.6

    23. Re:iBook! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      How do I make sense of Window Maker's version number scheme?

      Aha! I see. It is Window Maker's versioning scheme that Apple *must* follow. This is, of course, according to your reasoning because Apple based OS X on FreeBSD. FreeBSD definitely carries with it a moral obligation to use Window Maker's versioning scheme. Therefore, for Apple to make up their own versioning scheme is near sacrilege.

      How did I do? Did I sum that up pretty well?

      -Brent
    24. Re:iBook! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      You ignorance, and lack of reading skills, is amazing.

      I guess 10.1 is the major number... cuz we know the difference from 9.x to 10.0 was minimal at best.

      Idiot Mac zealot fucktard piece of shit.

  4. OpenZaurus by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Informative

    OZ 3.2 just came out, and has a slew of features that rock vs. the standard ones, such as:
    variable RAM vs. storage allotment
    writeable flash
    new SSH installed by default
    ability to sync to anywhere, not just your local USB

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  5. Used Libretto's by mcSey921 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can be had on Ebay for $100-200. This is the solution that I went with for a WiFi subnote to test our network.

  6. OQO by cavedwler · · Score: 1

    Well, its not out now, but its definately worth waiting for... sometime in the second half of this year the OQO Corp (www.oqo.com)will be releasing their first product. It is basically a full PC the size of an average PDA. I been fighting with myself not to buy others that are on the market since I found out about these... Check em out. They start at less than $1,000 for the base model which will have a 10 GB HD, 256 megs DDR DRAM, 802.11b AND Bluetooth to name just a bit...

    --
    "Sex is a very natural and wholsome thing, but only if it isn't done right." Welcome To Paradox
    1. Re:OQO by cavedwler · · Score: 1

      ok, in my hurry to post I forgot to mention that it is shipped with WINXP, but hey, its just like any other machine I have bought in the past.. Buy it with windows, whipe it and install linux...

      --
      "Sex is a very natural and wholsome thing, but only if it isn't done right." Welcome To Paradox
    2. Re:OQO by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

      What concerns me is the statement "The smallest Windows XP computer" ... Does that mean its proprietary?

    3. Re:OQO by cavedwler · · Score: 1

      I think its just an appeal to the masses or morons that think the latest windows has to be the best OS out there.

      --
      "Sex is a very natural and wholsome thing, but only if it isn't done right." Welcome To Paradox
    4. Re:OQO by OwnerOfWhinyCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While those are very cool, and I want one just for that reason, there is no keyboard on that toy.

      Since the poster specifically mentioned:
      All I really need is a linux command line to run SSH, links, and a few other things.

      Then I'll wager no-keyboard is a deal breaker.

      If you really want to run a command line comfortably, I'd suggest you bump up to the "small notebook, of previous generation processors" category. I just sold my Armada M700 series laptop, and I think it's lesser brothers might be a good match for your needs. The M700 was a true platform in that they had a large range of processors and ram that fit it. So compatible accessories abound on ebay.

      Since they were targeted at the corporate types they have good docking station integration, and most importantly although there are an abundance of modern slip in peripherals (like a DVD/CDRW combo drive) the ones with the 400Mhz processors run XP like slugs so the corporate types are getting off them quick. This gives you a rare combination of "older laptop prices" but modern laptop battery and peripheral capability.

      This one here. Will probably sell for $270. It's PII 400Mhz processor will run a LowProfile Linux very well, and then you get multiple xterms per screen (which is always cool when your admin-ing). Cooler still you can slip out that nearly useless DVD drive and slip an additional battery in, and get excellent run times. Which you'll need for 1500 .ogg files you'll still have space for.

  7. Along the lines of the Zaurus... by pr00f · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run Familiar on my Compaq (now HP) iPaq handheld. Very sweet. Get a PCMCIA sleeve, a wireless card, and you're all set. For those of you doing wireless security work, Kismet runs beautifully. There's also a GTK or Qt base available for you developers.

  8. more details by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    probably people need two more criteria. What is the budget in terms of $$, top end, and do you need a real keyboard integrated?

    Without knowing those things, I think that any notebook or subnotebook (really no industry cutoff point there I think, it's a matter of taste) used that has a known track record of running and installing linux easily will narrow it down, then look at that list for best battery life. Virtually all decent used notebooks nowadays accept pcmcia cards, so wireless is just a matter of putting the appropriate card in.

    Also, you have to ask yourself, is one or two lbs difference really a deal breaker? You might be able to get a pretty decent machine if you are willing to lug around 2 more lbs in gross weight. It seems like every pound subtracted from a "normal" laptop costs another 500 bucks or something like that and makes it harder to see and use. Me, I'd just as soon hump the extra weight and have a bigger screen and bigger battery, etc, for cheaper cost. For your needs, the older and slightly heavier used laptop would be cheaper to buy, then you could spend the savings on more ram, the wireless card, etc. Anything 200 mghz or larger runs linux in graphics mode just fine with enough ram, so text mode should be a piece of cake.

  9. Sharp Actius MM10 by dhwang · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the Sharp Actius MM10. It's basically a 10.5" screen and keyboard with integrated wi-fi. Just over 0.5" thick, 2.1 lbs and fanless. I saw it at Fry's for about $1300, but if you just want a machine that is basically a wi-fi terminal, this is the one for you.

  10. Averatec 3120V by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Informative

    This baby has been selling at Best Buy for $550 after rebates, which means that a lot of those items would be popping up on eBay brand new and sealed. It's a subnotebook from Sotec, a good Japanese brand, that's apparently trying to wage a price war on the US market.

    I was able to boot up Knoppix CD with no problems, brought networking up and was capable of playing MP3 and MPEG video files. Have not tried installing Linux on it, but the assumption is it would go fine, since everything worked in bootable-CD version of Knoppix.

    1. Re:Averatec 3120V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call this one a sub-notebook.

    2. Re:Averatec 3120V by Erect+Horsecock · · Score: 1

      This guy got RH9 on it but it wasn't perfect or painless. Linkage

      --
      I hope you die painfully and alone.
    3. Re:Averatec 3120V by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      It is comparable with Librettos and Porteges. Read the specs on the manufacturer's site, the notebook is quite small and slim (although not ultra-slim).

    4. Re:Averatec 3120V by BJH · · Score: 1

      Sotec... a "good Japanese brand"?! HAHAHAHAHA.

      Really, Sotec have the worst reputation possible in Japan. Go to one of the large Japanese web BBS sites, and look at the posts there about it.

      If you believe the reports, among other things they quite happily ship refurbished machines as 'brand new' ones.

    5. Re:Averatec 3120V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was me. Actually, RH9 didn't install at all. Though you probably could. Slackware 9.0 works great. Wireless works, DVD playback with Xine and DeCSS worked, everything was good except for the bad internal power supplied that whined when it was running and charging the battery and running the LCD at the same time..

  11. Latitude LS (non-new hotness by slacktop · · Score: 0

    I have one of these little babies, and it weighs in at just over 3 lbs. In order to acheive the light weight, you sacrifice onboard floppy and cd-rom, and are stuck with 800x600. And it's a PIII 400MHz, so it won't be the zippiest thing around. But, it's tiny, easy to carry, durable, and runs Mandrake and Red Hat without a problem.

    1. Re:Latitude LS (non-new hotness by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

      For a mew few hundreds more, you can get it's cousin the Dell Latitude L400, or C400....or ofcourse the new x200(which is near pefect).

      Ebay has all of these starting from $400-1300.

      --
      If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  12. iBook by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


    Get a low-end iBook. It's more fully-featured, but the price and weight are very nice, along with them being well-nigh industructible. It runs Linux, can boot OS X as well if you need non-ported apps and gets the job done.

  13. Linux Laptops by mcelrath · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you intend to run linux (and only linux) on this laptop, I strongly encourage you to buy from a vendor that will sell you and support linux on it. Do not send any of your hard-earned money to the monopoly in Redmond for a product you will not use. Vote with your dollar or there will be no linux laptop vendors.

    I have collected a list of vendors and some other information on the subject. Unfortunately this information is rather difficult to find. If you know of other vendors not on my list, please reply!

    -- Bob

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    1. Re:Linux Laptops by sirmikester · · Score: 1

      Nice Page, hopefully more and more vendors will offer linux pre-installed. Here's hoping that IBM/Dell/HP will see that there is finally a demand.

      --
      In linux libertas
    2. Re:Linux Laptops by davesamson · · Score: 1

      Having linux preinstalled on a laptop is great. But a lot of these companies just uninstall the preinstalled Windows installation and install a Linux distro over top of it. Even though you are not getting Windows, you are still usually paying for it one way or another.

    3. Re:Linux Laptops by mcelrath · · Score: 1
      None of the vendors on my list do this. (read the damn page) If you have information to the contrary, please tell me which vendor.

      -- Bob

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
  14. Compaq Armada M300 by faster · · Score: 1

    12" screen, 6G disk, docks into a base that has a CD or floppy and lots of ports. It's more a micro-notebook than a subnotebook, but it's thin, reasonably fast, and I got mine for free. Runs Linux just fine; make sure your firmware is updated.

  15. What you need.. by TSTM · · Score: 1

    is exactly the Lindows MobilePC. It's a sub 3-pound laptop with loads of battery life. It has all the features you need after a small investment in a pcmcia WLAN-card. The notebook costs only $799, which is quite a bargain.

    You can dump lindows, as it doesent serve any purpose and install something useful. =)

    1. Re:What you need.. by trouser · · Score: 1

      Blummy heck.
      Please post me one.
      We don't have Walmart in my country.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
  16. Emperor Linux by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Emperor Linux


    nuff said

  17. If you're willing to use NetBSD instead... by yandros · · Score: 1

    There's a small but active community that works on NetBSD support for those `Palm PCs' of yore, built to run WinCE, with small screen and keyboard. I myself have an IBM WorkPad Z50: ThinkPad keyboard, 8.4" LCD, CF and PCMCIA (not cardbus).

    The battery life on these things is phenomenal -- the extended capacity battery goes for about 11-12 hours. The common package for it includes a battery bay that lets you run the thing off of a bunch of AA's. Wireless networking has worked for years. It has no hard drive, so you generally end up using the CF slot for storage and the PCMCIA for wireless network card.

    If you want it, and have the space for it, the thing also supports X and sound; I don't bother (space is a premium).

    The same group does a lot of work on various models of the MobilePro, reporting good success (the keyboard's not as nice as the workpad z50, but the workpad z50 is discontinued, so...).

    1. Re:If you're willing to use NetBSD instead... by yandros · · Score: 1

      Also, I just noticed that NEC has a new item in the MobilePro line coming out soon: the MobilePro 900.

  18. Toshiba Portege 3015 by inepom01 · · Score: 1

    I have one of these and its pretty nice for Linux. The base config is 233 mghz 32 ram 4 gig HD. 2.5 video RAM. The thing weighs about 2.9 pounds and I am constantly asked how much it costs because it looks expensive. Has 2 PCMCIA slots for wirelress/network cards. Here's a current action and here's a past one. This thing is cheap and will definitely run your ssh, etc. I am running Slack 9 on it and its very nice. APM is supported so sleep/wake is almost instantenous. You can do some graphic stuff too, fvwm2 and opera and gaim run great on it for web browsing/emailing/IMing.

  19. not such a great choice by g4dget · · Score: 1
    The iBook is pretty big compared to many x86-based subnotebooks. It's battery-life is so-so among subnotebooks (a good subnotebook can get 8-12h of running time these days).

    As for the software, OS X is not Linux; there is far less UNIX software available for OS X than for Linux and porting software to it can be a pain. PPC Linux works surprisingly well, but it still is second rate compared to the x86 versions of Linux.

    Buy an iBook if you like OS X and want to run OS X applications. For anybody looking for a Linux laptop, there are better choices out there.

  20. no Linux, apparently by g4dget · · Score: 1
    The Actius MM10 comes with Windows pre-installed. Sharp's warnings about the machine not running anything other than the pre-installed OS are unusually dire (you may not even be able to install Windows XP Professional on it).

    If you have unearthed credible reports of Linux installations on the MM10, please share them with the rest of us. Until then, the MM10 should probably be considered a "Windows-only" machine.

    Another interesting question about the machine that has, so far, been unanswered, is whether its use as a dockable disk-drive is OS dependent. That is, is the USB mass storage implemented by hardware that is separate from the main processor, or is it implemented in the BIOS, or is it implemented by some piece of code running under Windows?

  21. Fujitsu LifeBook P-1000, P-2000 by g4dget · · Score: 1
    The Fujitsu LifeBook P-1000 and P-2000 seem to be good choices and apparently run Linux quite well. They get up to 15h battery life. The keyboard is a bit cramped, though. They start at around $1200.

    Some of the Sharp laptops (though not the ultra-small MM10) and the Sony PictureBook seem to be alternatives and have also been reported to run Linux.

  22. Sony Picturebook by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    I've had SuSE, Debian and Red Hat distros running on my Picturebook C1-VE. Very nice and very little fiddling to get them working with the wide screen. Never did get the video camera working but then I didn't care enough to try very hard and people on the PB mailing list have reported success.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  23. Re:The Zaurus? Small keyboard hard to deal with. by rovitotv · · Score: 1

    I don't have a Zaurus, but I had a iPAQ and even with the full size keyboard it was very difficult to develop programs on. I think you would be better off with a sub notebook of some sort, because of keyboard difficulty.

  24. Sony Vaio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing Ted Ts'o use a couple of different ones and saying that he had no problems, I bought a dozen for work to run Linux. They're small and work well with Linux. The only small problems are that all of the smaller Vaio's have 800x600 screens, but that isn't really a problem since we don't use X-Windows and I know most Linux users don't either. The text screen are very readable, even with the small screens, at 100x44 (I think that's what we're using). The other problem is the battery life. While we get 20 to 30 minutes worth of battery life out of our new Dell's and Toshiba's, the Vaio's will never make it past 20 minutes. The extra batteries are $125, so having enough batteries to last a 3 hour flight costs over $1,000, and it's annoying to carry nine batteries. We compromised on buying five extra batteries for each Vaio.

    1. Re:Sony Vaio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also bought a Vaio after see Ted Ts'o using one at the Linux Expo in 1998. He was sitting conspicuously at the front of the auditorium while Gosling (if I remember correctly) was speaking. I'm still using it, and four of the five we bought at work later that year are still in use. Yes, they're five years-old and five of six still work fine. I'd strongly recommend Viao's for Linux. I only ran X for about 10 minutes just to see if it would work, and it appeared to, so I can't really speak on how it well it runs X. They're also smaller than any laptop I've used, other than the useless (due to the keyboard) Libretto's. The batteries also last longer than any of the subnotebooks I've used. We usually get way more than the 20 minutes you mentioned. Assuming we're using a newer lithium ion battery, our Vaio's usually get 50% longer than that: around 30 minutes. With the $500 external batteries, we get nearly an entire hour of use. While that was nice, I can't really justify buying replacement $500 batteries each year for our five year-old laptops, so for now, we're stuck with 30 minute max uptimes.

    2. Re:Sony Vaio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great laptops. I've also got one from about that time. It's a 505FX. I've only had to buy three batteries for it since I bought it. I've bought way more batteries than that for my wife's Dell's (if you can't the batteries that come in the new ones). While it seems like it should have longer battery life than other laptops since it so small, it's actually about the same as all of the others, ~30 minutes. If it ever quits, I'll buy another Vaio. I just wish the battery life was better than their competitors rather than about the same.

  25. IBM PC110 by psergiu · · Score: 1

    Kind of slow, old and hard to find.

    But its small, has a somewhat usable keyboard, its small and it runs linux. Did i mention how small it is ? :)

    take a look here:

    http://www.wins.hrl.com/people/ygz/pc110/

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.