Slashdot Mirror


AIBO Robot Dog Soccer Competition

BrianWCarver writes "The Washington Post has an article about teams of college students who program Sony AIBO Robotic Dogs to play soccer against each other in teams of four. While Beckham's job is not yet jeopardized, the cool thing from an AI perspective is that 'once the humans flip the switch, the robots are on their own.' They compete in RoboCup whose stated goal is to 'by the year 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world soccer champion team.' RoboCup also has competitions with wheeled soccer bots (of varying designs) and have a humanoid league in which the Honda ASIMO appeared. The students in the above article are preparing for the four-legged international championship coming up in July of 2003 in Padua, Italy."

146 comments

  1. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're surprised by this? I don't know why anyone bothers commenting on dupes around here. It would be more informative to post "not dupes". Maybe we can add an icon for that...

    2. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And michael posted both of them.

    3. Re:Dupe! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      Maybe what we need is a Robot /. Moderator Competition. I'm sure even Minsky's students have enough time to put together a robot that won't dupe the front page.

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  2. Well... by Jack+Comics · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least the humanoid robots currently planned should be better looking in sports bras after a soccer game than some of the women currently playing professional soccer... *Shudder*.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Well... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't seen the Brazillian soccer team photos floating around have you?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Well... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      If they are dogs, you can add one more obstacle: Just put lamp post on the side of the field and the dogs that stop to pee are the winners since they really implement the AI of a dog!!!!

  3. Aibo is only good for one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  4. Deja vu by oldmildog · · Score: 1

    "The worst fad has been these stupid little robots," said Minsky.

    --
    They have the Internet on computers now?
    1. Re:Deja vu by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      "The worst fad has been these stupid little professors stuck in their ways. Why did anyone listen to them back then?"
      --one Sony Aibo speaking to another, circa 2015.

  5. Solution to Earlier problem. by thrillbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    In this earlier story we are told that AI is going no where due to the fact that graduate students are spending 3 years fixing broken robots instead of programming them.

    I think if they give up those big robots, buy some Aibos in bulk, they can skip the repair stage, or at least shorten it quite a bit. Of course, if they get them at Circuit City, they can get the extended guarantee and not have to worry about repairs at all!!!

    ---
    Never call a man a fool; borrow from him.

    1. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's probably relevant that some people believe that in order for an AI to acheive human-like awareness, it will have to perceive and experience the world as humans do. I personally don't subscribe to this; clearly, humans who are disabled or incapacitated and perceive the world from a wheelchair or bed are no less creative or intelligent than those who do not, but it is still an interesting point.

      And even if AI software is not progressing because of wasted time on robots, those robots are still useful. Can you really picture an Aibo bought "in bulk" beating humans at soccer?

    2. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Humans on a wheelchair still hear, see, smell and feel the world around them. They have restricted movement, but still can move with help. I think comatose humans would be much nearer to the AI that doesn't experience the world.

      An artificial environment probably won't take you very far. I'm not sure if there are any well known humans who spent all their life in their room or house, but I doubt that be as creative and intelligent as those who could have a normal life.

    3. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by thrillbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can you really picture an Aibo bought "in bulk" beating humans at soccer?

      Incredibly enough, I used to work for a company that used to make robots (Nomadic Technologies) who is no longer in business, mainly because the owners hated competition.. and it was obvious why.

      But back to the point... I have seen some amazing things done with robots and a little LISP programming. Robots working in conjunction with one another to acheive a common goal. And of course, the basic "learning of a laberynth", which is not that basic. This does make me believe that one day, technology will be able to beat humans at team sports.

      The reason for my belief is non technical; robots do not have egos and will work better as a team.

      ---
      To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and, whatever you hit, call it the target.

    4. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by schtum · · Score: 1

      The reason for my belief is non technical; robots do not have egos and will work better as a team.

      Also working to their advantage, steel skeletons will shatter brittle human bones with every tackle.

    5. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by jbum · · Score: 1

      In this earlier story [slashdot.org] we are told that AI is going no where due to the fact that graduate students are spending 3 years fixing broken robots instead of programming them.

      I assume you're referencing Marvin Minsky's quote:

      "The worst fad has been these stupid little robots...Graduate students are wasting 3 years of their lives soldering and repairing robots, instead of making them smart. It's really shocking."

      Minsky's whining fails to take into account that different people have different interests.

      If someone's into fixing toasters, you shouldn't complain because they aren't baking bread.

    6. Re:Solution to Earlier problem. by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if there are any well known humans who spent all their life in their room or house, but I doubt that be as creative and intelligent as those who could have a normal life.

      I'm offended!
      I am just as creative and just as intelligent as your people that have a so-called `normal life'!

      I'm going to go tell the leprechaun that lives in my wall about you, and he'll make you sorry you said bad things about my life-style! I recommend you start carrying an umbrella when you go to your so-called `outside', mister.

      seriously, I do go out sometimes, for LUG meetings, and college...

  6. Will there by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    there be several bikini clad beauties supporting the brazillian team or will I be wasting my time perving ... I mean watching this

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  7. Dont forget about R2 by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Funny

    R2D2 can now be a proud soccer mom

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  8. Minsky was right by Abm0raz · · Score: 2, Funny

    AI really has gone to the dogs.

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    1. Re:Minsky was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by intuition, i think the dogs are a result of japan's crowdedness... or efficiency... or something. because it seems like they invent electronic pets (tamagochi and now serveral generations of e-dogs) because they would like pets but they become too troublesome to manage. so minsky could be criticising what is no more than a toy with complex reactions.

      and no i didn't rtfa

    2. Re:Minsky was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so it should. Which is smarter, a dog or any of
      Minky's computer's? Not that I am endorsing the
      AIBO league itself you understand.

  9. maybe, just maybe by kupo+zero · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Maybe it is more interesting than REAL soccer is. *ducks from flames thrown by soccer zealots*

    1. Re:maybe, just maybe by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Well its certainly more interesting than watching a bunch of drug powered freaks trying to batter each other into submission in American football

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:maybe, just maybe by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Sports are all relative. I know many who are addicted to any sport, some to just one or two, and some who would like nothing more than the entire genre to get whiped out by a freak black hole. I only follow Football and Baseball but have a respect for other sports.

      Racing on the hand, now that's what I call boring!

      "Hey, are they still going in a circle as fast as they can?"

      "Yep."

      "Yeehaw!"

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    3. Re:maybe, just maybe by lubricated · · Score: 1

      Well for a while I was thinking that sports suck in general, but now I might actually watch a little football again, you actually made it sound entertaining.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    4. Re:maybe, just maybe by Wayfare · · Score: 1

      Nonono, that's NASCAR you're talking about. Granted there are a few courses that aren't eliptical, but F1 racing is at least somewhat better. I do think it's a waste of gas, though.

    5. Re:maybe, just maybe by schtum · · Score: 1

      Where are you from? Most english speaking nations have a rugby variant that makes American football players look like wimps.

    6. Re:maybe, just maybe by kupo+zero · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have said more interesting than AMERICAN soccer is. European soccer (go Barca!) is a helluva a lot more interesting, mainly because there are real fans, and talented players.

    7. Re:maybe, just maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name any othe sport where you are responding to things traveling 200 MPH? Potential for death and dismemberment? Ever seen a car go around a dirt curve at 70 MPH sideways, with a cliff or a rockface to greet you if you mess up?

      Baseball moves a little slow by comparison.

    8. Re:maybe, just maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racing, along with gymnastics, track & field, weightlifting, hunting, swimming, biking, and fishing, all have competative competitions. That does not make them a sport. Just because folks get aploplectic about it doesn't make it any more true either. If you want to lose several hours of your life watching cars spin in a circle until one completes the course a fraction of a second faster than someone else by all means go for it. Just don't confuse it with sport.

  10. Asimo Kicks Balls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There isn't a humaniod robocup league, there was just a demonstration of Asimo during the American Robocup Open.

  11. World Cup by 2050? Bah! by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 5, Funny


    When a humanoid soccer-playing machine can be developed such that a simple slide tackle (a legal maneuver) can snap limbs, the world cup is a sure bet. This will take far less than 47 years. In fact, drop the "humanoid" requirement and we could be there next year.

    Sometimes there's an elegant beauty in simple brute force.

  12. Uhh by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    If these robots accidentally collide or tackle someone in soccer, forget about an instant red-card - it would probably crush bones.

    1. Re:Uhh by SpaceRook · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that in 50 years, robots will be much more organic and lightweight.

    2. Re:Uhh by B3ryllium · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, true. But that won't make them Brazilian.

  13. Will they act like soccer players? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the robots be primadonnas who crack during penalty kicks in extra time? Will they be programmed to roll around on the ground in a dramatic display of bad acting?

    1. Re:Will they act like soccer players? by L7_ · · Score: 1

      Or pull thier jersey's (or whatever covering they have!) over thier head and spread thier arms out making a "brrrrrrrr" noise and run back to midfield after they score a goal?

    2. Re:Will they act like soccer players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not worried about that.

      Will they act like soccer FANS? Will there be AI robots programmed to riot in the streets? Will they be programmed to burn women, kids, houses, and villages after being a soccer fan?

      The world awaits breathlessly.

  14. Yes but... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Can they Bend it like Beckham? Very good movie, by the way.

  15. New Olympic Demonstration Sport by blair1q · · Score: 1, Funny

    Robotic grass growing.

    Couldn't they think of a game more exciting than Soccer? Or is this just the final indictment of this stultifying "sport" for people who can't afford a stick?

  16. Wow... ambitious by jat850 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a very ambitious goal for the RoboCup team ... it will require great strides in so many areas: things like image recognition, mechanical and electrical engineering, and a severe amount of artificial intelligence breakthroughs. Soccer is not just a game that can be "solved" like checkers, tic-tac-toe, and awari are, and chess will be. It requires a much higher level of artificial intelligence (decision making, goal-based planning, etc.)

    It would be very neat to see something like this happen, and I know 47 years is a long time, but it's still an incredibly ambitious goal :)

    --
    the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
    the me that you know is now made up of wires
    1. Re:Wow... ambitious by jat850 · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... on second thought, I suppose a game of soccer is probably less a question of goal-based solving, and more utility-based planning.

      --
      the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
      the me that you know is now made up of wires
    2. Re:Wow... ambitious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small point -- chess won't be solved. Even if you turned the entire universe into an 100% efficient hard drive, you couldn't store all the positions.

    3. Re:Wow... ambitious by jat850 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, good point, and a poor generalization on my part.

      --
      the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
      the me that you know is now made up of wires
    4. Re:Wow... ambitious by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Soccer is not just a game that can be "solved" like checkers...It requires a much higher level of artificial intelligence (decision making, goal-based planning, etc.)

      It would be very neat to see something like this happen, and I know 47 years is a long time, but it's still an incredibly ambitious goal

      So, is your choice of words deliberate, or the result of subliminal suggestion?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Wow... ambitious by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      Chess is not a solvable game. There are more possible chess positions than there are atoms in the universe. You'd have to build a computer that could hold a position per atom of memory space to solve it. Thus you'd have to build a computer larger than the universe. Either that, or a computer that could store more than one postion per atom. Say a system was possible where one could store 100 positions per atom of space. You'd still have a computer 1/100th the size of the universe.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    6. Re:Wow... ambitious by jat850 · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're exactly right, I made a mistake with that statement :)

      --
      the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
      the me that you know is now made up of wires
    7. Re:Wow... ambitious by jat850 · · Score: 1

      Definitely not-deliberate. I should spend more time proof-reading.

      --
      the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
      the me that you know is now made up of wires
    8. Re:Wow... ambitious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NERD ALERT! NERD ALERT!

    9. Re:Wow... ambitious by norton_I · · Score: 1

      That is only true is chess is somehow "maximally complex" by which I mean that the most efficient algorithm for calculating the optimal move is a lookup table or exhaustive search. This is almost certainly not the case. Whether chess is solvable, then, is an unanswered question -- it may still be complex enough that no winning strategy can be found.

      "Solving" chess will require a radical departure from current algorithms, which are basically finite depth exhaustive searches plus heuristics to throw out less promising avenues. Given that computing power looks to completely surpass the best humans in the world within the next decade or so, I don't know how many people will seriously study other approaches.

      Go is actually a game I hold a lot of home for computers being able to solve. While the number of configurations is much larger than chess, the mechanics of the game are much simpler. I expect we are merely awaiting a mathematical revolution in go playing that will allow computers to handily beat humans even if doesn't completely solve the game.

    10. Re:Wow... ambitious by tmortn · · Score: 1

      I really am not sure how impressive this would be. Obviously there will be the initial struggle to make a fast enough and agile enough robot soccer player that can compete on the field safely with human soccer players.

      However unlike trying to put together the perfect Human soccer team with the proper variables you can custom build the skills of the robots at will. IE nothing to stop having a team that can mimick all major styles of play and to effortlessly shift between them.

      Physical capabilities need not be limited. IE sure you can designate a top speed / force capable of being expended by the bots but how about getting tired ? Soccer players don't go 100%, they have to pace themselves as needed. There would be nothing stopping a Robot from always running 100%.

      Not that it isn't something I would like to see but once physcial capacity of the bots reaches approximately to that of a human team the competition is somewhat moot. You would have to limit the physical capacity of the Robots at some point or the obvious strategy is to make robots fast/strong enough that humans simply can't keep up. This is not unfair strategy. Fast teams out run slow teams etc... Take the finest Womens Team and Pit them against the finest Mes team and you have a perfectly fair example of superior strength/speed etc will do on the field of play.

      There is always a trade off between physcial and mental ability on the field of play. However there is generally a point at which sheer physical superiority will beat the best strategy in most physcial contests. For example take Annika Sorrenstrom playing against the Men. She at least has the proverbial snow balls chance in hell of doing well. Its not outside the realm of possibility. The problem is that day in and day out she has no chance long term of competting against the Men becasue she has to play to such a level of perfection just to compete much less win that it simply isn't sustainable. What happens when you can make robotic Bipeds all capable of running the hundred yard dash in 7 seconds and turn/stop on a dime and maintaining that for the entire match who can accurately kick and pass with a consistency that is obviously machine like. A goalie that has nanosecond reflexive response times that allow it to intervene between a shot from any concievable goal scoring angle in an inhuman amount of time ?

      As for that not being fair... whats fair got to do with winning a soccer match in terms of physcial ability utilized within the rules of the game ? Why would you build a robot team to outwit a human team when you can build one that is capable of simply overwhelming it ? This dosn't mean changing the rules. There is nothing that says a player can't compete becasue they are too good , too fast, too strong etc... Nothing stops Shaq from dominating the NBA because he is bigger than most eveyone else, Jordan becasue he was so much better/dedicated etc... Kofax/ Cy Young/ Johnson. Drysdale from being so dominate on the pitching mound. Pele, nuff said. Humans are limited by genetics and ingenuity, robots only by ingenuity. We can be pretty damn ingenious when it suits us and I have little doubt we can engineer robots capable of beating our butts on a soccer pitch if we so desire.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    11. Re:Wow... ambitious by svb · · Score: 1

      Actually, a lot of the AI research has been done already - by entertainment companies such as Electronic Arts. (Ever played FIFA 98, or 2000, or whatever year it happened to be?) The computer players have (moderate) intelligence, and do make plays of their own. Of course, they "walk" on two legs, don't exist, and have a collective mind, but I'm sure the basic algorithms could be used in AIBOs. (AFAIK, correct me if I'm wrong.) /Sean/

  17. Any volunteers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'by the year 2050, develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world soccer champion team.

    So... do I have any volunteers? Of what I've heard, the team we're going to meet today is named "Bone Crunchers".

  18. Top 7 Reasons to like Robot Dog Soccer by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    7. This will get the attention of some geeks; maybe enough to draw attention away from "Star Trek" and cause this dead franchise to finally go away.

    6. The moment when the goaltender says "Danger, Will Robinson!" is priceless.

    5. Lots of fun game play alterations when robot bones are tossed onto the field.

    4. Only a matter of time before they allow Taz-Bot, Die-Sector, Vlad, and the rest of our Battlebots friends onto the field. Then the fun really starts.

    3. Gets rid of the problem of urination on the field that is plagues any event with real soccer players or real dogs.

    2. Americans love dogs. Americans hate soccer. So, this is likely to move soccer from #74 to #63 on the ESPN-2 ratings.

    1. Two words: Mecha-Aibo

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Top 7 Reasons to like Robot Dog Soccer by mike_mgo · · Score: 1
      2. Americans love dogs. Americans hate soccer. So, this is likely to move soccer from #74 to #63 on the ESPN-2 ratings.

      No damn it, that will just be more competetion for the NHL playoffs at #61, right behind billiard trick shots and the national spelling bee.

    2. Re:Top 7 Reasons to like Robot Dog Soccer by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      Americans don't hate soccer, American journalists hate soccer.
      The sports media is controlled by sports writers who only understand the so called major sports they grew up with. The MLS which is still not a mature league gets 100,000+ people per week at their games. The US national team is ranked 10th in the world, FIFA World Ranking ,and they regularly draw more than 50,000 per game. People have been saying for years that once the US national team is good the media will cover them better. Well, they're good now and nothing's changed.
      I know I can never convince anybody of how great "the beautiful game" is but in a country where the national sport is baseball I can't accept the "soccer is boring" excuse.

  19. First they play soccer autonomously, ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    then they're serving us our coffee, and before you know it, they won't open the pod bay doors, they've turned Skynet against us, they've completely commandeered the Forbin Project, and Brent Spiner is being paid more than anyone except Patrick Stewart. When will we learn?!?

  20. long tradition by AbdullahHaydar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These guys are following a long tradition (in technology years) of soccer-playing robots.

    From this article:

    "This year's challenge was to build soccer-playing robots. An unfortunate choice perhaps, given the possibility of confusion between RoboCon and RoboCup. The latter is another Japanese-inspired initiative, whose goal is also to build soccer-playing robots (Australasian, 30 August 1997). But there are clear differences between the two. RoboCon is based on mechanics, whereas RoboCup is more electrical, being mainly to do with communications and software. Also RoboCup robots are completely autonomous. (RoboCon robots) are remote controlled."

    --


    Suicide Booth: You are now dead! Thank you for using Stop and Drop, America's favorite since 2008.
  21. Interesting quote by kiwimate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [The team]...changed the "confidence level" before shooting. Instead of looking for a perfect opportunity, the dogs would shoot faster and more often. It worked.

    So what they've done is end up with looser play and lower hit rates as opposed to higher accuracy. That's fine for winning a soccer tournament (and please understand -- I'm by no means discounting the incredible coolness of what's going on here), but how would this translate in the real world?

    Here's something even more cool to think about...just imagine if you could program the dogs to adapt their style of play over the course of the tournament (learning) and then observe if they "naturally" tended to this style of play in any case.

  22. Hey wait a second by pclminion · · Score: 1

    We just heard from on high (ahem, hello Mr. Minsky) that this whole exercise is pointless and stupid!

  23. Re:woop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they anagrams?

  24. What was really cool... by glazik · · Score: 1

    ... this was going on (in part) upstairs from a lecture by none other than Neal Stephenson.

    Sweet day at CMU, I'd say.

  25. um, not cheating = "cool"? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    the cool thing from an AI perspective is that 'once the humans flip the switch, the robots are on their own.'

    How else do you hold an "AI robot" contest? Humans mucking about with the things is called cheating. If they get disabled or whatnot, of COURSE they should be left alone.

    I hate robot/AI contests which are dumbed down- watch a robot 'soccer' match, and often you'll see volunteers putting robots back on the right course when they've boxed themselves into a corner and such...like the programmers/designers shouldn't have to be 'troubled' by such things as getting trapped by two walls, or all the contestants have such miserably designed/programmed robots that they fail left and right.. Everyone wants to work on the "chase the ball" routine, but nobody wants to work on the un-sexy, nuts-and-bolts, "keep from smacking the wall and staying there" routine.

    In the real world, there are no magical hands that pick you up and flip you around and set you going with a pat on the CPU...and what every robotics person calls "simplifying the problem", I call "cheating". This constant cheating has led to a field which is incapable, still, of dealing with the simplest problems but can solve these wonderful complex ones. The result is a lot of electromechanical garbage that's simply unuseable in anything even remotely resembling the real world.

    1. Re:um, not cheating = "cool"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take a look at the current rules, at least in the F180 league the goal is to be fully autonomous.

      "5. Full autonomy procedure defined as:

      a. All robots stop on stop signal

      b. Referee places ball

      c. Assistant referee sends restart type

      d. Robots autonomously assume position for restart and may continue moving

      e. Ball is in play when it is kicked an moves."

      I agree in past events there has been a lot of human intervention, but the point of the competition is to overcome these obstacles, which are not trivial, and a lot of progress has been made. As for the "chase the ball" opposed to the "keep from smacking the wall and staying there" watch some videos of the good teams... there's some pretty impressive plays and moves that don't have to be set up perfectly, they adapt, look for openings, and don't bump into anything, let alone the walls.

    2. Re:um, not cheating = "cool"? by norton_I · · Score: 1

      Who said you get to write the rules?

      For a long time, your parents set you upright with a pat on the head everytime you fell while learning to walk, and you had the benefit of millions of years of evolution designing a body and brain nearly hardwired to walk.

      I think you dramatically underestimate how much harder avoiding "turtle on back" failure modes is than chasing the ball (or playing soccer, or any other game with a well defined set of rules). To do it well probably requires an array of sensors comprable to that in a human or animal, plus a body of comprable complexity to the human skeletal-muscular system, plus the computing power to process all that sensor data.

      That isn't to say this isn't an important problem, but lay off the people who choose to work on something else, and certainly don't call it cheating.

    3. Re:um, not cheating = "cool"? by mpthompson · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't had the pleasure of watching a 12 month old child for an extended period of time. At that age my son would often get himself into predicaments that he could not extract himself from. I remember one time when he managed to squeeze himself under a leather ottoman and wound up with his arms and legs flailing out from each of the its four sides. Needless to say, the magic hand of dad had to come to his rescue.

      What's so amazing with kids is their relentless passion of exploring and learning about the world around them. The first three years of life are an endless cycle of observation, mimicry and experimentation. I think that truly autonomous robots will have to develop some facsimile of emotions so as to have an inner drive to explore and modify their programming to better cope with the world around them. What we need is a robot that can feel pain when tumbling down stairs, hunger when power is low, frustration when trapped and a sense of joy and accomplishment at finally figuring out how to extricate itself. At that point we can then simply sit back and let the robot figure out for itself how to avoid the "keep from smacking the wall and staying there" routine.

    4. Re:um, not cheating = "cool"? by vectra14 · · Score: 1

      this would make the game completely impossible for new teams. at the US Open only CMU and Cornell even had working systems in the SSL F-180 league...

      RoboCup is still "just getting started". it takes alot of resourses/time/money to build a working system, and we want to ENCOURAGE new teams to enter, not discourage them.

      there are many other rules that would be implemented if this weren't the case. Full autonomy is a biggie. there are other ones such as rules on touching and so fourth.
      -sergei/Cornell BigRed'03

  26. Automate the World! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only a real geek would take the time to automate an athletic event.

    1. Create robotic soccer dogs
    2. Replace human athletes
    3. ?
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Automate the World! by fobbman · · Score: 1

      Finally, an opportunity to get even with all of those torturous jocks from high school!

  27. Re:World Cup by 2050? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I've heard from friends that in one of the competitions the CMU robots were spinning so sharply they were breaking other robots. (this was not the ABOIs, there are a number of entries in robotic soccer).

    Sadly they do not yet have red cards written into the rules.

  28. Top 10 Robot Soccer Dog Team Names by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    10. Drooldroids
    9. Dyna-Mutts
    8. Cyberpups
    7. WinterMalaMutes
    6. FIDO-Net
    5. 3L33T T3RR313R's
    4. The B-9 K-9's
    3. See-Threepoodle's
    2. The Borgzoi
    1. BITches

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Top 10 Robot Soccer Dog Team Names by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      What's so soccer-team-name about those names?

      Let's try:
      FC Bayern Robots
      AC Milan Three-legs
      Real Poodles
      Paris St All-These-Dogs-Are-For-Sale

      --Flam

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
  29. Obligatory Pun by FFtrDale · · Score: 1
    on the pronunciation:

    How soon will we see the "Robot-Coupe," (Fr. kitchen appliance, pron. Ro-bo-Koop') in which the losing team gets tossed into a Cuisinart?

    --
    Think, write, think, edit, think...then post.
  30. Story earlier today by Nept · · Score: 1

    about AI going nowhere. Something to do with Graduate students wasting time soldering and repairing robots . . .

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  31. Is it just me, or... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    ...would AIBOs be _vastly_ more interesting if they had weapons? :)

    Something more along the lines of 'AMEE' from that awful movie "Red Planet," perhaps...only not psychotic.

  32. Ironic by t0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    weird how there was a different slashdot article today saying how instead of working on AI people where wasting time making little robots, then lo and behold, here is an article about stupid little robots!!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  33. football (offtopic) by Maimun · · Score: 1
    The game is called football . Check out FIFA's official site if you don't believe me.

    Why can't people agree to use that name in international context, and call the american game "american football", although in it the ball is moved around (AFAIK) mostly with hands?

    1. Re:football (offtopic) by dj_paulgibbs · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Bush has something to do with this.

    2. Re:football (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as ridiculous as an American baseball contest being called "The World Series" as if anybody else cared

    3. Re:football (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has teams... they even win on occasion.

    4. Re:football (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, isn't the term 'soccer' derived from the word 'association', as in 'association football' (the complete name for the game).

  34. Re:Against G0D by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    What's next? Robot humans sniffing each other's butts and humping in the street?

    You've never seen a Linux Users Group have you?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  35. It's football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only in America is it called soccer.

    It's football for christsake!

  36. It is called SOCCER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is called soccer.

    Look at it this way. There are several different sports already competing for the word "football" (and most of them are not soccer!) It is quite confusing to try and also call soccer "football".

    In contrast, there is only one soccer, so why not call it that?

    1. Re:It is called SOCCER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just cause Americans can't go along with the rest of the universe and call a spade a spade....

      It's called football - unless you live in the US where it has to be called something else cause it conflicts with that weird game you play - you don't even use your feet - so how can it be football??????????????????

      Dumb ass yanks.

    2. Re:It is called SOCCER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just cause Americans can't go along with the rest of the universe and call a spade a spade...."

      When you say football, which of the 3-4 different sports are you referring to? Aussie rules? American? Rugby? Others?

      When you say soccer, which... oh never mind, there is only one.

      Americans call a spade a spade. You guys call a shovel a spade (when there are more kinds of shovels than spades out there)

      "you don't even use your feet "

      Tell that to the NFL kickers. Tell that to the running backs. They don't roll across the field. They *gasp* use their feet!

    3. Re:It is called SOCCER by Maimun · · Score: 1
      It is called soccer.

      Look at it this way. There are several different sports already competing for the word "football" (and most of them are not soccer!) It is quite confusing to try and also call soccer "football".

      In contrast, there is only one soccer, so why not call it that?

      In Italy, the game is known as "calcio". In Argentina they call it "pellota", AFAIK. In the US/Canada it is called "soccer". Fine, different countries, different names. Internationally, however, the game is known as football. It has been like this for much more than a century.

      It is olympic sport and the name they use is, of course, football, not soccer:

      The Olympic Committee

  37. heathen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That leaves more time for the all-important drinking of beer!

  38. Robot Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see an autonomous class in addition to the RC controlled!!

  39. Because it is soccer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Only in America is it called soccer. It's football for christsake!"

    If someone says soccer, you know what it is. If someone says football, you have to find out which of the several different sports they are referring to.

    Americans may not like soccer, but at least they have a better less-confusing name for it.

  40. A similar competition by meowsqueak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This competition is similar, although in my opinion has more engineering merit. I spent a year developing a team for the 2002 Korea competition but unfortunately we were beset with a poor budget (NZ$5000 - things got tight) and outrageous shipping delays (6 months for motors) and never completed the team.

    It was interesting because not only did you have to develop the AI to allow the robots to 'play the game', but you also had to develop a computer colour vision system to 'read' the state of play, as well as a suitable control system for the robots themselves. The use of H bridges and avoiding burning out the motors or circuitry when suddenly reversing direction brought in some interesting research from the university's mechanical engineering department. Wireless comms also came into it, with a one-way FM link. A great project bringing many different areas into one 'arena'.

    FIRA has several different classes of competition (we were working towards Mirosot) including a 'simulation only' class.

    1. Re:A similar competition by vectra14 · · Score: 1

      Fira sounds very much like exactly like RoboCup. now, i don't know which one came first or if they're in competition or anything, but i fail to see why you thing it has more engineering merit. FYI, RoboCup also has quite a few leagues: AIBO, SSL, Rescue, Simulation (at CMU they had a REALLY cool interface), and a bunch more). so, if you can provide any specific examples of rules, it would be much appreciated.

      The second paragraph is a necessity for any robot soccer-system of this type. For wireless, some SSL teams use 802.11b (all AIBO's use it AFAIK). Many SSL teams use wireless modules on the 433/418 frequencies. H-bridges or such (i.e. pairs of MOSFETs) are unavoidable. vision is too (working on that now :) ).

      i completely agree with you on the last statement in p2. these are great multi-disciplinary projects.

      -sergei / Cornell BigRed'03

  41. They'll need a little programming by quantaman · · Score: 1

    develop a team of fully autonomous humanoid robots that can win against the human world soccer champion team.

    Sure they'll need some basic programming to be made autonomous but judging from a lot of what I've seen of professional soccer these robots should be able to give a human team a pretty good game!

    --
    I stole this Sig
  42. Re:woop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes you win free stuff

    hooba flaz rarra ra er ijdsa adfji stuff pork eat less less more more huh what you say captain how are you gentlemen

    ---+ |
    | |
    +--+--+
    | |
    | +___

    HEIL SLASHDOT to the max
    bagel agel angel linux to the max woop woop

  43. The World Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "just as ridiculous as an American baseball contest being called "The World Series" as if anybody else cared"

    You assume that America cares much about it in the first place.

  44. Robot Dog Soccer by occupant4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    After reading the headline, I thought this article was about people playing soccer with the AIBO robot dogs - in my opinion, a far more fun sport than robot dogs playing soccer with soccer balls.

  45. You call that a game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "these robots [robotwars.com] should be able to give a human team a pretty good game!"

    You call that a game? Your first problem is when the whirling saw punctures the ball rather than move it anywhere.

    If they can get past this, there are rules against smashing shins and sawing feet off.

    Within minutes, all of the robot team would be ejected from the game, except for the useless ineffectual "Buddy don't Play in the Street" and Tentamushi.

  46. And that's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we have algorithms.

  47. I was there by daves · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My son and I went out for the day on Sunday to see what was up. The Aibos were a hoot to watch, but nothing to write home about in terms of playing soccer. They had trouble keeping track of themselves and the ball at the same time.

    According to the lead researcher (the lady in the left in the picture), the dogs communicate with each other on their position and the location of the ball. You could see some cooperation in their actions, but not much. They would sometimes spend some time deciding who would go for the ball, but I never saw anything like a coordinated pass on a breakaway.

    They don't yet track the opposing players, and got too easily hung up on obstructions, like the corner of the goal. A dribbling player would stop every couple of steps, look around to check the location of the corner posts, and lose the ball.

    In terms of soccer play, the smaller, wheeled league was much more impressive. The single camera gave the team a comprehensive view of the field, ball, and opposing players. Every robot had an arrangement of colored dots on top to identify the player and it's position. The players were fast (probably a 1-2 second dash from one end of the field to the other), and were effective at dribbling (with a spinning bar that spun the golf ball toward the robot) and shooting (with a kick bar).

    There was not a lot of depth to the competition. The 3rd-4th place consolation game consisted of a whole lot of nothing going on. Hopefully, more schools will get involved for future research.

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
    1. Re:I was there by marksthrak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those were our robots in the 3rd-4th place game. Afterwards, I was thinking along the same lines as Minsky. That being said, I'm about to hike into the lab for an evening of hacking...

      You're right about the small league being more exciting, though. The dogs really can't do anything, but if you watch two good teams in the small league, you'll see a much better, more human game.

  48. Trouble brewing... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    What if those soccer robots develope their own conscience, start killing the humans, and send a robot back to the past to kill the leader of the human resistance?

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re: Trouble brewing... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > What if those soccer robots develope their own conscience, start killing the humans

      I think you mean "consciousness". If they develop a "conscience" then they'll behave OK.

      > and send a robot back to the past to kill the leader of the human resistance?

      No problem: we'll just appoint the guy who invented them to be the leader of the human resistance.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  49. But... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a waste of valuable AI grad student time?

    --
    Beep beep.
  50. this is just the kind of nonsense by andy666 · · Score: 1

    that minsky was complaining about.

  51. Robot Soccer's Boring! by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lets mount weapons on them and have them battle to the death!

    The couple of robot battle shows Comedy Central and Discovery ran a while back were boring because the robots weren't autonomous. Any hardware monkey can make a remote controlled killing machine. Autonomous ones would be way more interesting! And if they just happened to go mad and start killing the audience, well that just makes it more interesting, doesn't it?

    I think I must be channeling Professor Farnsworth...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Robot Soccer's Boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I tried to enter such a competition, but they wouldn't let me in. Screw those guys! I'm going to build my own Autonomous Robot Battle show. With Blackjack. And hookers! In fact, forget about the show!

  52. Dupe! by cgh4be · · Score: 1

    Dupe! Dupe! Dupe! Dupe! Dupe! Dupe!

    Here.

  53. soccer playing AIBO vs my soccer playing poodle by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

    I should have looked into this before trying to play soccer with my pet dog (living flesh & blood) and consequently breaking his leg. Poor thing now has his front leg wrapped up with a stint and does a goose leg walk. My dog, Doc loves to chase after the soccer ball. So my wife and I played keep-away from the dog Saturday. It was a glorious day, warm sunlight and a faint cool breeze. So my wife lobs the ball up in the air to my left, I take about six quick strides to the ball as it is still in the air, step down, planting my right foot down on the dog's front leg, my left foot out in the swinging to strike the ball. Poor thing yelps out as I stumble and bumble trying not to crush the 10 lb. Dog. Maybe I should have waited 5 more days to consider using an AIBO to play soccer with Doc.

    --
    I hate all sigs, even this one.
  54. WAY TO GO MICHAEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FUCK - thanks for posting the article twice you goddamn ignorant SOB - you fat fuck of a fag - I hate you and will shoot you in the head with my FUCKING ASCII TEXT BITCH!

  55. Robocop. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    I loved that scene in Robocop where the sportscaster was talking about the final two teams in the world series: The Tokyo Samurai, and the Toronto Blue Jays. Americans kicked out of their own sport. - It was great!

  56. Aibo - Software Development by ejtttje · · Score: 1

    For those of you who would like to do research with real world data, but don't want to spend time actually building the robot before you can use it - the Aibo is a great platform.

    There's a free software development kit from Sony as well as an application framework to get you jump-started.

  57. Whelled robots have been replaced by omni by FuzzyFurB · · Score: 2

    I used to compete in RoboCup (for 3 years with Cornell) in the Small Size league. I believe the writer of this post is referring to small size (f-180) bots when he uses the term "wheeled soccer robots." I'd like to point out that very few small size robots use two wheels to move around any more. Most use omni-directional drive which consists of a number of spinning balls on the bottom of the robot which allow them to move in any direction at any time. This is very little to do with this post and might be seen as a rant, but since I was on the Cornell team when we brought this different design to competition first I feel a little dedicated to point out that wheeled robots are old school, omni designs now rule the playing field. :)

    --
    Will Stokes Album Shaper http://albumshaper.sf.net
    1. Re:Whelled robots have been replaced by omni by vectra14 · · Score: 1

      yo yo. sergei of the current team (cs) here. we're very sorry for the embarrasing game. we were halfway done porting the 2002 ai into our brand new framework and
      a) our defense was not tested
      b) we had not offense
      c) our vision was messed up (old 2002 vision...)

      we promise a much better showing at italy :)
      -sergei

  58. Aaaaarrggghh! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 2, Funny
    Whatever you do, don't let Marvin Minsky hear of this!

    ------

  59. Tired of all the Matrix Reloaded promo tie-ins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the "Making of" specials, then the beer commercials, then the anime stuff, then the "philosophy of" crap then all the slashdot AI articles, then the...

    Oh, you mean this isn't another Matrix thing? Sorry. My bad.

  60. Reprogramming the AIBO by Traa · · Score: 1

    This AIBO competition has been going on for a few years now. I remember reading about it a few RoboCups back. The coolest thing at the time was to read that the team that eventually won the AIBO competition didn't just win by programming the best path algorithms and ball recognition algorithms, they went all out and re-programmed the core AIBO mechanics to make it 'walk' differently in a way that helped it manouvre more cleverly and outpace it's competition to the ball.

    Very cool stuff.

  61. The Matrix machines by ehiris · · Score: 1

    I wonder if we will see an advanced Aibo tomorrow. Maybe Aibo is going to try to bite Neo for stepping on its tail.

  62. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can it fuck a mexican prostitute?

  63. Who peels the Oranges? by sTavvy · · Score: 1

    and serves drinks at half time? R2D2?

  64. Irrational behaviour and emotions? by hoytt · · Score: 1

    As long as the robots can't do the irrational things human players do, it'll be a sterile thing. An elbow at the wrong place, a late tackle or similar things can add some charge to a game. Anyone who doesn't believe that should have seen last night's CL game between Inter and AC Milan. The emotinal factor made it a better game.

  65. Re:World Cup by 2050? Bah! by deathcloset · · Score: 1

    Look, I can take a tank out onto the playing field right now, and I doubt that any players are going to get very far with the ball.

    My point; of course we have machines that can outperform humans, had em for a while. But they can only outperform us within very limited criteria.

    for instance, a backhoe can dig much faster than I, but I don't think it can dig as precisely as I can. A car can go much faster than me, but not up a very steep rock face.

    so I think the point of a robotic soccer game is to show a machine with many of the abilities of a human. Also, I think any machine playing soccer against a human must have at least legs. And currently there are not very many dexterious machines with legs.

  66. what I want by metamanda · · Score: 1

    I really really want a dog sled pulled by like a hundred Aibos. They would look so cute in snow shoes.

  67. AIBO programming for hobbyists by touretzky · · Score: 2, Informative

    As previously reported on Slashdot, Sony has opened up the API for the AIBO, and it can be programmed in C++. My lab has created an application development framework for the AIBO called Tekkotsu that we think people will find helpful. The code is open source and GPLed. Visit Tekkotsu.org for an overview, downloads, demos, and documentation.

  68. Honda ASIMO? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    Okay, the first one is okay, but I'm waiting for the fifth.

    Honda ASIMO-V should be really cool.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  69. Brazillian and Other Beauties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about Brazillians, but we can stick to
    the language. When I was there in '01 there was a
    Portugese team. Those girls did not need to be bikini
    clad to catch my intrest.

  70. New Korean gear runs rings around Aibo by B747SP · · Score: 1
    At the CeBit show here in Sydney, Australia last week, this mob were demoing a little 'joint' motor and some control gear. You buy a bunch of them, assemble them together in different shapes ('humanoid' and 'doggie' seem to feature heavily), program it up and make a robot.

    Reasonably interesting stuff, granted, but the really funny bit was the big-screen demo movie they had running on the stand. A little robot built out of some of these things and a controller board dragging a big pink Aibo ball around, taunting, and running rings around a Sony Aibo! The Aibo didn't stand a chance, this thing was kicking it's arse!

    I always wanted an Aibo until I saw one in action. It was nothing but a stupid shit-fer-brains toy - you'd need a *real* imagination to consider that to be a pet.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  71. Actually this is no joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robots are already like real soccer players. If things
    don't go exactly there way they tend to either sulk,
    are start spinning around and running about
    for no reason.

    On another front, there is a rule in the small sized league
    against one robot pushing another. So if you can get
    your own robot to roll back when in contact with
    another, you will get a free kick. For all I know there
    are several teams out there which have implemented
    such dive code but aren't letting on.

  72. US players piss on the field? yuk! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    yukkkkkk!


    US football (soccer) players urinate on the pitch during games? "(Gets rid of the problem of urination on the field that is plagues any event with real soccer players )"... No wonder football (soccer) isn't popular in the USA. I never understood why the beautiful game wasn't as popular there as in the rest of the world, now I understand. Uggg.
  73. Bender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only that, Bender drank all my beer!

  74. Sony is hosting OPEN-R seminar by digicosm2 · · Score: 1

    It seems Sony is hosting an OPEN-R/AIBO programming seminar, and it's free to the public!

    Lookee here.