Slashdot Mirror


Gamecube Software Support Waning?

Thanks to Shacknews for pointing to a CNET News report discussing the declining amount of titles being planned or released for the Nintendo Gamecube. It quotes an Activision spokesman as saying "I think it's good for the industry as a whole if you have three strong players, but that's not the direction it's going." Is the Gamecube third-party software support on its way out?

40 comments

  1. WANing? by MadocGwyn · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read that and assume it was a networking thing? (noone say anything starting witht he letters beo)

    --
    Jesus saves, everyone else takes full damage from the fireball.
  2. I'm sure the support staff is relieved! by Nathan+Ramella · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No longer having to field 3 phone calls a day from the 2 people who own gamecubes.

    --
    http://www.remix.net/
  3. Software, Software, Software! by dimator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Read that like Ballmer would.)

    The problem for Nintendo is and always has been lack of quality titles from 3rd party developers. Their in-house games are high quality, but you can't support a console on one must-have game every 4 months.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Software, Software, Software! by easychord · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure.

      I think that on average a console is doing pretty well if each owner buys 4 games a year. Many people can afford to own more than one console as well, and if a gamer decides that they "must have" Metroid or Zelda they buy the console for that game.

      The cube is managing to keep me happy at the moment.

      I look at PS2 and it has a lot of titles that I'm not interested in or can get on GCN, PC, or even DC. Might buy one for Ico and Frequency, but both seem to be out of print.. This tells me that I can't expect my gaming needs to be met on PS2.

      XBox has more intersting stuff that may get me to buy one in the future. Psyconauts, Fable and smaller XBox could get me to part with my hard earned in 2004.

  4. I don't care: by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nintendo produces enough quality games by themselves, that I'd still buy a Gamecube if every single third-party developer dropped dead.

    For $200 - you can get a nice little box that hookes up to your TV and can play Zelda on it. Just for that, it's $200 well spent. If you're a poor SOB, sell it for $100.

    Hell, XBOX owners think the same thing - they practiaclly can call it the HALO-BOX.

    Me: Herd you got an XBOX.
    XBOX user: Yeah! It's got Halo. (Shows me the level with the Jeep-thingys on the beach)

    Next month:

    Me: Played anything good recently.
    XBOX user: Yeah! I got Halo. (Shows me the level with the Jeep-thingys on the beach)

    --

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:I don't care: by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Xbox has a hell of a lot more than Halo.

      Take a glance at all the action on Xbox Live. Lots of excellent, highly-active games not named Halo.

      Sega's sports games are developed with the Xbox as the primary platform (downgraded to work on PS2, and now no longer even developed for GameCube). Sega's also graced the Xbox with great stuff like Panzer Dragoon Orta and Jet Set Radio Future.

      I own all three systems, and I've been playing the GameCube the most recently. But there is so very little 3rd party support for the Cube. The Xbox's is FAR better in that department. PS2 is, obviously, the 3rd party king.

    2. Re:I don't care: by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Nintendo hasn't really ever had huge game libraries for their consoles, but they don't usually have a lot of crappy games either.

    3. Re:I don't care: by zonker · · Score: 0

      umm... you mean nintendo hasn't had huge console libraries in the past several years. the nes, snes and if you want to look at the gameboy as a console, they all have very sizeable libraries...

  5. Releases may be waning, but... by mhesseltine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For as long as I can remember, Nintendo hasn't had a monster catalog of games available. Sony's Playstation had more games available than the SNES or N64, PS2 has more games than Gamecube. However, that's not the reason that I (or other gamers, I assume) buy the console. It's not about how many games are available, but how many that you would actually *want* to play. It doesn't matter that every possible sports title is available on PS2 if I'm not interested in playing sports games.

    My take on things is, the games that are available for the Gamecube are good, high quality games that people want to play. As a result, I don't think that Nintendo is going away any time soon.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:Releases may be waning, but... by analog_line · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a matter of fact, the Dreamcast had almost twice the number of games released for it in the US as the Nintendo 64, which was out for what...5 years? Compared to the Dreamcast's 1.5 year run.

  6. ps2 apologist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the stories' title makes the author sound like a ps2 or xbox apologist. it looks to me like someone in the editing office has an axe to grind against nintendo by giving a weak story such a strong FUD-filled title...

    anyway, the real meat to the article is in the last couple of paragraphs where the author explains that nintendo knows they have work to do and they are doing it.

  7. So what's going wrong? by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nintendo has what _should_ be a very easily used platform: IBM processor, ATI graphics card, pretty straightforward architecture. The Sony PS2 has all kinds of heavily proprietary hardware, yet it has the vast lead in third-party software. Is it Nintendo's traditionally draconian licensing schemes, the mini-DVD format, what?

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:So what's going wrong? by jayoyayo · · Score: 1

      the problem is that ps2 came out nearly a year earlier than gamecube so developers have had more time working with ps2 hw. as it stands right now, it is easier to develop for ps2 even tho nintendo's hw is... well, better.

    2. Re:So what's going wrong? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      It's the fact that A) The PS2 installed base is 10 times the size of the GCs B) Nobody really gives that much of a crap about the fact that it's proprietary.

    3. Re:So what's going wrong? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      It's probably Nintendo's hefty licensing fees.

  8. Didnt they say this 3 years ago, and fix the probl by willr7 · · Score: 0

    Some flaws in the argument in the article

    A)The article says that sales for the gamecube hardware are behind previous estimates
    )The xbox sales actually exceed gamecube sales by a very small percentage; also doesnt state that estimates were a few thousand units behind or millions-big difference,

  9. Nail in the coffin? by pjh3000 · · Score: 1

    Isn't a lack of games what killed platforms such as the Atari Jaguar and Sega's Game Gear? Even if the games that do come out for the GAMECUBE are sensational, it will still have to compete with a platform like the PS2 that has a massive catalog of PS2 and PSX games available. I guess it comes down to quality vs. quantity. And quality didn't help the BetaMax.

    1. Re:Nail in the coffin? by analog_line · · Score: 1

      An insane lack of games didn't kill the Nintendo 64. I don't think it will kill the GameCube. And if it does, no big. I still have my Dreamcast plugged in too. It'll just make all the games cheaper, and I'll have the whole library instead of just the few I wanted.

  10. you all missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its because microsoft can afford to buy all the third party gaming titles (rare) and therefore fewer games will be released for the gamecube. they are doing the same shit that got them into trouble in the 90's, using their wealth and monopolistic position to squash any potential competition. the only reason that MS lost over 1 billion dollars last year on the xbox was because they were spending all that coin on buying third party gaming titles. so 2 or 3 years down the road, the only games that will be released will be for xbox or playstion.

    1. Re:you all missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Nintendo that sold Rare, so you can hardly blame Microsoft for predatory business practices. Sony is probably the worst in terms of spending cash to deny games from other consoles (Final Fantasy, GTA, etc..)

  11. Didnt they say this 3 yrs ago and fix the problem by willr7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forget my previous post, i hit submit before i could finish...anyway....here's what i wanted to say....

    Some flaws in the argument in the article

    A)The article says that sales for the gamecube hardware are behind previous estimates
    1)The xbox sales actually exceed gamecube sales by a very small percentage;
    2)also doesnt state that estimates were a few thousand units behind or millions - big difference, if only a few thousand behind no big deal, right?

    B)The gamecube was developed with third party players in mind. The N64 was impossible to program for (according to game companies), and nintenod knew this and came out with the cube to make game development much easier.

    C)If you follow gamecube news at all, all you hear about is how nintendo needs to up third party development, which i personally think it's doing , and nintendo knows it needs to do this, and as the article states it is in the process of attracting game developers.

    D)Anything that's not on the cube can be played on pc, anything that is not on pc cannot be played on the cube:zelda, metroid, mario kart, etc.. (xbox fanboys:halo is coming out for pc)

    I honestly cant think of one game that i want to play that is *console specific* that cant be played on another medium, besides gamecube games.

  12. What Good Is It? by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If it can't run Linux or NetBSD, what good is it?

    Free operating systems run on all the others; obviously that's the real reason GameCube is in decline. The solution is clear: Nintendo needs to release a Linux port! (A NetBSD port will appear, as if by magic, a few weeks after.)

    It will be fun to run it under the gCubix GB emulator that runs on Linux.

    1. Re:What Good Is It? by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I think the port will be pretty straightforward. I was at last year's OSCON where the "SpongeBob Squarepants" developer talked about how easy it was to port Python to the GameCube...drool.

      I think the real trick will be burning a distro onto the mini-DVD, reversed spin direction format.

    2. Re:What Good Is It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the disk doesn't spin in the reverse direction. It spins in the same direction as normal DVD's. The difference is, on normal CD/DVD disks, the data starts on the inside and moves toward the outside. On the GC format, the data starts on the outside and moves to the inside.

  13. more gloom n doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Substitute Apple for Nintendo and we've got the "beleagured black sheep" of the computer industry, still trying to do things on an "obsolete" model, with no third-party support, and no hope for the future.

    Both companies are of course still profitable and control a great deal of mindshare in their collective industries, but that doesn't stop the pundits from predicting gloom n doom again and again.

  14. Well, my viewpoint on this is.... by wobedraggled · · Score: 1

    Nintendo owners are used to a certain level of quality IMHO, and also the fact that we tend to get 3rd party titles well after they are out on other consoles doesn't help. Take Splinter Cell for example, after it's M$ xbox exclusive run, it came to pc and ps2 and LAST gamecube. Don't expect things to sell if your not willing to make the effort. This ongoing resentment twoard Nintendo is getting old.

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  15. Is quality of cross platform games an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For games that come out on all three systems, is there a perceivable difference between platforms (ps2, xbox, gc)?

    I have this guess that's the case and the cube unfortunately falls behind the others in graphics, but i don't have the systems to do the comparison.

    Anyone know of any comparisons of the same game on multiple systems out there?

    1. Re:Is quality of cross platform games an issue? by ubikkibu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can comment on TH:PS3, TH:PS4, Spider-Man, TimeSplitters 2, LoTR, Harry Potter, SSX Tricky having actually played them on multiple platforms. And I've read every "platform shootout" review on IGN when games come out for all 3.

      The results are almost always consistent. XBox pushes more polygons while maintaining some more advanced lighting effects. GC next, PS2 third unless the developers gave short shrift to a certain platform.

      You're completely wrong--the GameCube is obviously more capable than the PS2 for video. Both have limitations, but even with the giant developer community, great support from Sony, and years more to learn the tricks of the platform, PS2 games rarely show better than the same GC titles. Again, generalizing. And the XBox beats both easily, again with some exceptions.

      GameCube has great sound when there's real DPLII support (which is most of the time), PS2 games vary wildly, but the XBox DTS output is the best. Yes, I've had all 3 hooked up to my surround sound setup, and component video for GC and XBox.

      GameCube suffers from slightly less storage, and so FMV sequences are sometimes badly compressed.

      Having said all that--who gives a crap. Good games look, sound, and play great on all 3 (if you can handle the dain-bramaged XBox controllers). Full motion video rarely adds to a title. Games are for playing, not for comparing. EA will always shovel out crap that underlines how the game industry--with happy exception of Nintendo first-party stuff--has completely forgotten what makes gaming fun. GameCube easily holds its own in the fun department.

  16. Gamecube is a solid platform by Khyl'Dran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My view is the same as a few people who posted here: Even with a waning third party support, Nintendo itself is able to publish some excellent games for the cube. PS2 is technologically backwards, and nearly all its good games can be played either on the PC or on the Xbox (or even the gamecube). The Xbox's advantage is Xbox Live, but many of its good single player games can be played on the PC (halo is comming too)...

    The gamecube already has an AMAZING list of great single player games, all exclusive... and I am sure nintendo is planning to lure in some third party developers (and famous names in the business as well). Take Hideo Kojima (Metal Gear Solid games)...he's going to start doing exclusive stuff with nintendo and the cube.

    But if you are in doubts, check out the highest scoring games of the cube and the xbox at IGN.com. You'll see that nearly all good xbox games are either multi-platform, or are coming out for the pc, while nearly all gamecube gems are exclusive titles...

    Now dont get me wrong, i have an xbox and love it, but i think that if you have a good pc, the Cube is a great console to get, because of all the amazing exclusive games it has...or get both consoles and be really happy :D

  17. Halo? Never played it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, Splinter Cell is fucking amazing on XBOX!

    BMX XXX is fun, also... and I'm not just talking about the strippers.

    I've rented some enjoyable star wars games for xbox, nothing great. The sports games are excellent.

    I owned a GameCube first, and then was pretty disappointed with the graphics. It's not noticeable on a small TV, but I was lucky enough to get a 50" HDTV, 16:9, and there is no comparison between XBOX and GC for graphics, even on non-HD games.

    It's also nice getting 5.1 DD surround sound on most games for XBOX.

    I had Mario Sunshine and Metroid, but didn't bother finishing either one. :-( Sold the GC on ebay and bought the XBOX. I'm no fan of Microsoft, but the system is great...

    And while I've seen Halo being played on it, never thought it looked that great.

    1. Re:Halo? Never played it... by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

      I had the reverse of your experience, perhaps because I'm not so focused on the marginal eye-candy improvements of the XBox. Splinter Cell looks awesome--but that entire genre is pretty played out, IMHO. I've got a 36" HDTV that had the XBox and GC hooked up via component, and I think calling the GC graphics "disappointing" is a stretch. Did you buy my XBox on E-Bay? Sorry it was so dusty.

      BMX XXX? Come on, that game blew. Not literally--that might have helped it. It was one of the weakest "extreme sports" titles I've seen.

      You didn't finish Metroid Prime? You are no longer worthy to comment on this topic.

  18. HALO-BOX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you say DOOM3-BOX?

    Ouch!

  19. Shut Up and Play by ubikkibu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bought XBox, GameCube when both were released.

    XBox gigantic and noisy, controllers sucked, especially for my seven-year-old son with whom I do most of my gaming. Halo was stupendous, Jet Set Radio Future was trippy-excellent, most everything else was underwhelming. I'm bored with the console FPS stuff that is nearly all you can get for it. I bought probably 12 titles and rented several, but after it collected four solid months of dust, I sold it.

    GameCube was a totally different story. Small, quiet, with genius controllers. Then the WaveBird wireless controllers came out and I couldn't believe how perfect they were. Several top-notch games that I have basically never stopped playing after I beat them: Pikmin, Rogue Leader, Animal Crossing, Metroid Prime, Zelda, Godzilla:DAMM, Monkey Ball, Eternal Darkness, and several others I'm spacing right now. Mario Sunshine and StarFox were clever but had little staying power.

    Clearly I'm skewed towards the out-of-the-ordinary games that for some reason rarely show up on PS2 or XBox. (This is why we still bust out the Dreamcast once in a while.) But the GameCube could disappear today and I'd be forever glad I got one--it has been simply awesome.

    Forget the FUD--GC has sold enough units to make Nintendo $$$, and the GameBoy juggernaut will keep them in business forever. Play the games you like, forget about the "big three" competition gossip--it's for industry hacks.

  20. end of PC gaming for me by Twister002 · · Score: 1

    I've been slowly waning myself off of using the PC for gaming and getting more games for my Gamecube.

    I've never been much of a fanboy, but the Gamecube and Gameboy Advance are turning me into one.

    It started with Golden Sun on the GBA, continued with Eternal Darkness when my wife bought me a GC for Christmas, expanded to include her when I brought home Animal Crossing, and I was pretty much converted to a fanboy when I picked up Metroid Prime & Metroid Fusion. Now I'm looking forward to buying Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, MGS 3, Ikagura(sp?), and many more to come in the next few months.

    My only concern is the lack of online games. Right now only Phantasy Star I & II are online. I think Nintendo realizes that online gaming is a big thing and they are moving in that direction. But I couldn't name any titles that are coming out with online support. I HOPE Animal Crossing II comes out with online support, that would really make it the "killer app" for the GC.

    The only other thing, besides the lack of online gaming, that could make me want to buy an Xbox would be if Doom3 does not come out for the GC. Right now I haven't heard of any plans to realease it on the GC. I'm far enough behind the PC power curve that buying an Xbox to play Doom3 would be much cheaper than buying the hardware upgrades for my PC.

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:end of PC gaming for me by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, yes. Golden Sun. Finally beat it, got Golden Sun 2: The Lost Age, transferred character data, kept going where that left off. Brilliant little RPG.

      It's really going to suck when Nintendo finally releases a 3-D capable handheld. There is such genius possible in 2-D, and now that the Dreamcast lives only for underground development--not that there's anything wrong with that--the GBA is the last bastion of a real gaming art.

      I think Nintendo has done a great job with the GC-GBA connectivity. I've had a few titles for both: Metroid, Rayman, and of course Animal Crossing. And I never felt "suckered" by the extras, instead it was always a happy bonus when I could beat one and unlock something in the other. Or create new patterns for my lovely umbrellas and shirts on the GBA, then send them to the GC for showing off in Animal Crossing. MS and Sony have nothing similar.

  21. Already turned around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the trade press and Nintendo press releases it's clear that Big N has already addresses this and you can expect to see a lot more high quality GameCube titles in the future.

  22. wow, great examples by mikemulvaney · · Score: 1
    However, Splinter Cell is fucking amazing on XBOX!

    BMX XXX is fun, also... and I'm not just talking about the strippers.

    You can play both of those games on the game cube as well. And the game cube was the only system to offer BMX XXX uncensored, AFAIK.

    -Mike
  23. Did anyone else notice that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ..the PS2 Network Adaptor is outselling the GameCube?

    Hah!