Slashdot Mirror


FTC Moves up "Do Not Call" List Registration

tbase writes "AdAge.com has an article about the new FTC "Do-Not-Call" List which will be opening for registrations earlier than previously announced. The FTC Press Release says online registration will be available "on or around July 1." and that "Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions.""

42 of 474 comments (clear)

  1. How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $11,000 per spam would be nice for me. I'd quit my job and just post my email address all over the intarweb.

    1. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd prefer a no-spam list over a no-call list. I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money. As I've said before, if enough people did this, there would be no need for a do-not-call list.

      Spam, however, offers little or no means of retaliation. So I just start praying...

      "Merciful Lord, look down upon your humble servant and strike down the heathen company which seeks to increase the size of my privates and undo your good work. Rain tumors and boils upon them and cause their Exchange servers to crash."

  2. Woo Hoo by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looking forward to saving 15 bucks a month getting rid of Privacy Manager and caller ID.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  3. 11,000 dollar fine? by huckda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by gwernol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

      But that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money - which is a significant amount. The last thing you want the legal system doing is encouraging illegal activity...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
  4. Stunning by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny
    Even if they are following in the footsteps of many state governments, this is an astoundingly good thing. The list here in Indiana has worked remarkably well.

    The only change I'd make would be to forgo the fines in favor of treating telemarketers as "enemy combatants."

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  5. Why $11,000? by dmomo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am not complaining about a penalty. But why so much for EACH offense? Is $11,000 arbitrary, or is there some reasoning behind it? Where does the money go, and what is it used for? It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

    1. Re:Why $11,000? by mhore · · Score: 5, Funny

      11,000 shall be the number, and 11,000 shall the number be. 10,999 is too low, and not the number, and 11,001 is right out.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    2. Re:Why $11,000? by cmburns69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In business and politics, money talks. When you fine a corporation, you have to get them to notice. If the fine were small, the law would be ignored.

      I believe a large part of this money is supposed to go back into keeping the DNC database running.

      And yes, I work for a business in the industry (well, teleresearch, but still annoying)

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    3. Re:Why $11,000? by mactov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about spending the revenue from the fines on a series of public-service announcements and ads reminding people that the best prevention for these things is for them to produce no results? The big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that every now and then someone actually does buy something and encourages them.

      Aside from a few very lonesome shut-ins (who are victims of this sort of stuff, not genuine consumers) I don't know of anyone who likes getting spam or telemarketing calls.

      --
      OK, now what?
  6. Re:Do-Not-Mail by missing000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes.

    It will cost you 5$ however.
    Next time, google.

  7. Happy Dude by hoopyfroodman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay. Eternal happiness is just a dollar away." 'Happy Dude' Well, I guess Homer's marketing scam won't work anymore.... drats! There goes my retirement plan. :(

  8. Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't wait for this to go live... then I can disable my $5/month Telemarketer block via the phone co. It's only about 90% effective.

    BTW, here is the FTC's current attempts at curtailing E-mail SPAM .

    It really is amazing the amount of trouble and money we all have to go through to rid ourselve of this plague of unwanted advertsing. Seems like it should be illegal, don't it?

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Nice! by Hellkitty · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Caller ID has been working 100% for me for the past few years, and it only costs $1 a month. It is quite simple - if you show up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller", there is not possibly anything that we have to talk about. You know who I am when I pick up the phone - I need to have the same information on you before I determine if I choose to communicate with you or not.

      I'll sign up, but I doubt that it will work too well. I did a little bit of telemarketing work while in college for some beer money, and let's just say that the place I worked for would not give two shits about this fine. I think they really stretched the boundaries of the law, and they'll probably find a way to do so with this. Enforcement will be difficult. If they call me even though I'm on the list, they are banking on the fact that I don't care enough to follow up on it. And if one call gets through to you once every six months, are you really going to be enraged enough to file a complaint? And once you do file the complaint, you know it will be caught up in beauracratic BS for quite some time before any action comes out of it.

    2. Re:Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, this is a sort of caller ID that spits the telemarketers a canned message if there number is on the phone companies list.

      I wouldn't feel safe not answering all of the "Out of Area" and "Unknown" calls... who knows maybe it's your wife from a pay phone after her car broke down. Shaite happens.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Nice! by feldsteins · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The main problem with caller ID is that it often works like this:

      1. Phone company charges you for a great new service allowing you to see who's calling, thus eliminating the need to speak with telemarketers.

      2. Phone company charges telemarketers for the ability to mask their number from the caller ID units.

      3. Phone company charges you for a new ANTI-anti-missle....

      and so on.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    4. Re:Nice! by smartin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, caller ID can give you a reasonable indication that the call is not worth answering. The problem is that you've already got up from what you are doing to go and answer the bloody phone only to find that it is not worth answering. Personally at that point i'm pissed enough to either answer and chew them out or answer and jerk their chain by wasting their time in some manner. My current fav is to just say hang on while i get the person whose name they ask for and leave the phone off the hook for a while.

      As for enforcement and getting people to report abusers, that's easy. The govt should just pay the victim a portion the fine. Give me $500 of the $11k and i will persue it every time.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  9. Too Bad Enforcement isn't moved up... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Enforcement will still only begin in October, and even then with the way it is written, the telemarketers will not need to actually look at the list until January 2004, as they only need to check against the list once every 3 months.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  10. A sigh of relief by andyring · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Finally, this idea is taking hold. I'll admit it does run a bit contrary to my conservative, smaller government, pro-business beliefs, but on this issue, I agree, this is the right thing to do. Of course, we'll hear a bunch of whining and moaning from the telemarketers about how it will hurt them. And, quite frankly, I don't care. Their calls harass me enough that I think it is worth it.

    I worked at RadioShack for six months a few years ago, and we were supposed to try and push additional things on our customers (cell phones, batteries, cables, more cell phones, and cell phones again). I hate suggestive selling. I hate doing it and I hate it being done to me. If I want it, I will buy it.

    If I want info on refinancing my home, new windows, fixing my credit, buying a coupon book, getting another credit card, etc., LET ME SEEK IT OUT. I despise the thought that others (aka telemarketers) believe they know what I want or need better than I do. I am perfectly capable of deciding what products or services I wish to purchase, so let me decide on my own without invasive selling.

  11. Re:Do-Not-Mail by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to get the UN to enact anti-spam resolutions! They can send inspectors in to verify that all ISP's are complying even! I hear that Hans Blix is looking for work...

  12. I want on a "Please Call Me" list by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    It gets kind of lonely here in my basement playing Quake and massaging my mom's feet.

    1. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

      303-499-7111. Call now for a REALLY good time

      --

  13. My Problem with This by moehoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Telemarketers do not follow current law. Very rarely do I get them to tell me their name or company name, let alone a manager name or address. 80% of them hang up when I ask to be placed on their DNC list.

    If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

    And in terms of the phone companies, they see the law and fines as just another expense in a risk/reward scenario. Slamming has been illegal for many year, but they still do it because the fines do not match the profit they get from it.

    This sounds like a great opportunity, but put me down as a skeptic. If the courts don't swat it down, then it will be simply ignored. The governments (local/state/federal) won't/can't enforce existing law.

    I get up to 10 calls a day. I'm sick of it. My phone and my e-mail has been confiscated by marketers of crap that less then .05% of the population wants or needs.

    Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners. Guard your phone number and e-mail address like you (should) guard your SSN.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:My Problem with This by deblau · · Score: 4, Informative
      Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners.

      Sorry. I can't waive my First Amendment rights in a civil contract. I can't waive FCC law through a contract, either. Anyone dumb enough to think that their fine print will get them out of trouble with the FCC deserves the lawsuit I file against them.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  14. Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by shodson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This new law probably won't matter because it seems like most of the telemarketing calls I've been getting lately have been coming from India. If MCI hires an Indian telemarketing company to call me did MCI break this law? How does this apply to overseas telemarketers?

  15. Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Okay, is this going to be like every other governmental agency that comes up with a great idea that will have a three year backlog on complaints. And even if it's not, is there a set definition of "solicitced" phone call.

    If you want to get really technical about it, unless you request someone call you, every phone call is unsolicited. I understand the argument about how if you give someone your phone number then you are granting them basic permissions to call you, but unless you unlist your phone number it has to be assumed that your number is not only public, but an invitation for you to be called.

    For every policy/law/order/decree there is a loophole or a way to get around it. Just a matter or time before this becomes nullified.

    I am not going to be adding myself to this list for the main reason that I love telemarketers. I actually had a gentleman call me last week.

    Telemarketer: Yes may I please speak to Doug.

    ME: May I ask who's calling please?

    TM: This is bob calling about an offer Doug just can't refuse

    ME: I don't think he can, Doug killed himself yesterday , it was so sad he had gone to college and then dropped out to be a professional rollerblader and then after a horrible drunk driving accident he broke his left leg, needless to say his skating career was over. He needed money to pay off all the medical bills so he got a job as a telemarketer selling the stupidest things over the phone and trying his best to make his quota for the night so that he could make it home to shoot up and stop the pain. Day after day he would go to work and realize how low he had sunk and truly began to question his worthiness to society as a whole. I guess he finally realized he was worthless and ate a 12 gauge shotgun shell. Messy as hell, but effective, we're still actually trying to figure out how to clean it all up. And all that just because he had a lousy job as a telemarketer.

    *click*

    Don't know how effective it is, but think of it like as an invited prank phone call where you can fuck with them all day long. Tell them you want to buy all there stuff and give the credit card number of 8888-8888-8888-8888, which you know is your number because you ordered one off of the TV and that's the number that was on it. Or just really play with their heads, tell them you want them to seduce you into buying their product or role play with them, have them call you mr moneybags or something. Ask them out on a date or something, have some real fun, these people abosultely hate their job, trust me, and you can only make it worse for them.

    Don't feel guilty, they called you ... remember?

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  16. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Informative

    It only costs $5 to submit it online. If you hit the "Register by Mail" button you can print out the form and mail it in for the cost of a stamp and envelope.

  17. Maybe not... by PseudoThink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they'd be opening a nasty can of worms if the general public had a financial motive to get telemarketers to call them. Scenario: you and a friend get jobs as telemarketers, then purposely call each others houses 50 times a day just to rack up profits from the fines.

    Considering we want this system to actually work (creates potential for a similar anti-spam system in the future), it's probably best to keep the system well-designed.

  18. It's better that is goes to the government. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That way the government is more likely to enforce the law. If it was up to an individual to enforce it, they would have to spend most of the 11,000$ as attorny fees bringing the telemarketer to court. Not to mention the waste of time and effort. The government on the other hand will go in an all out frenzy after these people, especially after Bush's tax cut, and the government has a lot more power behind it than the average Joe.

  19. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Will there be a fine for those companies who violates the list You referred to(dmaconsumers(slashdotted))
    Good God - someone who talks in LISP!
  20. Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How does this affect someone like myself who owns a small business and makes cold calls as a part of the marketing? I cold call other business people, usually at there place of work, and don't sell anything over the phone, I simply try to get an appointment to meet with the person to talk about their productivity and see how my consulting service might help them. Is there any risk to what I do now? Should I even bother with the DNC list, or is it cool since I'm only calling them at work (doubtful number is on the list) and I'm not selling anything during the call?

  21. How to make a telemarketer go away by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they call & ask to speak with Mr. Stevens, I explain they want the "other Mr. Stevens". As I hand the phone to my son, I tell him to explain all the fun things he did that day, from the detailed slimey booger he picked & where he wiped it, to his favorite & most proud stories about "pooping in the toilet." He is so proud of the shapes he can make. Usually after a few minutes of running around on the cordless phone explaining how proud he was with the details of his day, he comes back & says" they hung up". Imagine the rudeness of some people.....Go figure. More here

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  22. Hidden Law.... by Tsali · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but in a similar bill passed by the House of Representatives this week, the companies get a $12,000 tax break for each offense.

    (Fiction can be fun...)

    --
    This space for rent.
  23. I don't understand organizations fighting this. by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In our state, we recently had a no-call list instituted state wide. The telemarketing groups, of course, fought it tooth and nail.

    What I don't understand, is how they think that they are losing business. If I sign up for the list (which I did), I am stating an unwillingness to deal with a telemarketer already - they haven't lost a potential sale, because there is no way I'd buy from one anyway, and if anything they've saved their call center a bit of time and abuse.

    Even more puzzling are those who choose to ignore the state law and call anyway - like they think I maybe forgot I signed up, or that I'll be so happy to hear about the new windows or whatever they're selling that I'll change my mind.

    Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

  24. You could try this ... by Bake · · Score: 5, Funny

    You: *Ring*Ring* "Hello?"

    Telemarketer: "Good evening sir, would you be interested in a pre-approved credit card?"

    Y: "Listen, buddy, I'm on the FTC's Do-not-call list. The offense for calling someone on that list is an $11000 fine."

    T: "..... oh ..."

    Y: "Now, I might be able to let this one slide for a special fee of $5000, thus saving you and your company some $6000. Interested?"

  25. Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

    See, that's where you have fun, with the religious nuts. Have a knife covered with fake blood at the door. Tell them they're just in time to help sacrifice the virgin.

    Or open it wearing an outfit like The Gimp in Pulp Fiction. Tell them they're just in time for "Punishment Phase."

    Or, if you're bald, put on a white robe and try to convert THEM...very calmly.

    Or just point a watergun at them and shoot them every time they try to talk. The madder they get, the more you shoot!

    Or answer the door nude. See if they can look you in the eye as you converse about the finer points of being a Jehovah's Witness. Ask them if their religion bans nudity.

    See, there's lots you can do to get some enjoyment outta them!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  26. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Funny

    hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

    I dunno, man. Those Jehova's Witnesses are pretty persistent.

  27. My Answering Machine... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... does all the work for me. Here it is:
    Machine: "Hello?"
    I just let the people talk until they realize I'm not actually on the phone. One time this telemarketer called - one of the ones that just start talking at full speed and don't let you interrupt - and talked for 3 or 4 minutes to the machine whlie we sat and listened while eating dinner. After she had finished talking she asked, "so all I need at this point is to verify that you are over the age of 18... Hello?.. If you don't want to talk just f***ing hang up!" - click.
    I only wish I had saved the message to call them back and tell them how their foul-mouthed representative had raped my virgin ears and that I would never buy anything from them :)

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  28. Ask them if they mind if you record the call.. by Torqued · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've started doing this lately when I've gotten a telemarketing call.. A few of them were really caught off guard by it. Most have just hung up the phone.. no one has said "yes" yet! :)

  29. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except that:

    - it's my phone and I'm paying for the service. With that in mind it's perfectly reasonable to assume that I get to decide who gets to call. If I tell someone to fuck off, then they better damn well fuck off.

    - it's my email and my internet access. I get to decide to can send me mail using the services *I* pay for. In a capitalist society this is a perfectly reasonable expectation. Only a communist motherfucker would insist that I give everyone equal time on *my* dime.

    - it's my mailbox and it's my postal service. The postal service does not belong to spammers, nor do I have any recognizable alternative to said post office. One would think, given no alternatives other than the government agency that I supposedly control as a citizen of the United States, I could dictate an end to spam. Funny, I can't.
    And, by the way, you are *required* to have a receptacle on your property for mail delivery. This is a *law*. Funny thing, that.

    - most of all, it's *my* time. Neither you nor anyone else has any business wasting it unless you're willing to pay whatever fee I set. This too is good capitalism; in fact, excellent capitalism.

    Unfortunately for all of us, capitalism has very little to do with 21st century America. It had little to do with America prior to the 21st century, but even less so now. If we lived in a truly capitalist society I'd actually have the rights I listed above, as a logical extension of the free market. If anything, I'd have even more rights, provided by the tooth-and-nail competition of competing services all tripping over themselves to steal away customers, with the elimination of harrassment by low-life scumbags as a selling point for those services.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  30. This is the greatest news ever!!! by lawaetf1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, I can't think of a single thing that the government has done in the last year to improve quality of life as much as this new reg. The only sad part is that there are going to be those who won't hear about this for years to come. Any millionaires want to sponsor The Last Call to inform Americans about this new option? It'd be an ironic gesture, sure, but it'd also be the noose around the neck for these irritating parasites, may their stomachs roast in Hell forever!!

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
  31. Ironic Banner Ads by BigT · · Score: 5, Informative

    The banner ad I received at the top of the comments page was for telemarketing services and lists. I find this highly amusing.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?