Slashdot Mirror


FTC Moves up "Do Not Call" List Registration

tbase writes "AdAge.com has an article about the new FTC "Do-Not-Call" List which will be opening for registrations earlier than previously announced. The FTC Press Release says online registration will be available "on or around July 1." and that "Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions.""

115 of 474 comments (clear)

  1. How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $11,000 per spam would be nice for me. I'd quit my job and just post my email address all over the intarweb.

    1. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd prefer a no-spam list over a no-call list. I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money. As I've said before, if enough people did this, there would be no need for a do-not-call list.

      Spam, however, offers little or no means of retaliation. So I just start praying...

      "Merciful Lord, look down upon your humble servant and strike down the heathen company which seeks to increase the size of my privates and undo your good work. Rain tumors and boils upon them and cause their Exchange servers to crash."

    2. Re:How about a do not spam list? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a good plan.

      1. Sue and get paid $11,000 USD
      2. Pay out $15,000 USD in legal fees
      3. ???
      4. Profit

      You have to love the US legal system!

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    3. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money."

      I save the time. I just put the phone down and let them talk to empty air, and then eventually hang up the phone when it starts making the "Hey stupid, you left your phone off the hook" sound.

    4. Re:How about a do not spam list? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Funny

      > i have better things to do...

      I prefer to just say something along the lines of "can you explain
      that in detail?" and then gently set the phone down on the counter
      and go do something else for a while.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:How about a do not spam list? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is why you start a class action suit. If you can get a few
      hundred thousand people to go in on it, the $11000 per call starts
      to sound like real money, enough to pay some legal fees almost.
      Then your lawyers agree to settle out of court, take their cut,
      and leave you with $1.50 for each plaintiff, which still isn't
      much, but it's a positive number.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:How about a do not spam list? by TCaptain · · Score: 2, Funny

      better yet, just say "Yes, I'm VERY interested...can you hold one sec?" and hit the hold button.

      One telemarketter stayed on hold for 15 mins. Called back twice and stayed on hold again 15 mins each time.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    7. Re:How about a do not spam list? by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      You will fail anyway.

      Action plan:

      1. Found a company on the Cayman Islands.
      2. Buy some call origination in the US and a voice over IP trunk to your call droid center located in India.
      3. Telemarket as much as you like. All they can do is force your telco to close your lines. You are out of FTC jurisdiction.

      All familiarity with existing chinese SPAM is only superficial ;-)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  2. Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I sign up on the Do-Not-Mail list?

    1. Re:Do-Not-Mail by SkArcher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, we all wish - unfortuanately, because e-mail is exactly the same accross borders, most e-mail spam could be sent from outside your country and would not have to comply

      What I would like to know is if it is possible to have your snail-mail address put on a no bulk mail list. I have enough coasters already thank you AOL.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    2. Re:Do-Not-Mail by missing000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes.

      It will cost you 5$ however.
      Next time, google.

    3. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tell you what, I was hoping to get a positive mod a la funny.

    4. Re:Do-Not-Mail by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

      We need to get the UN to enact anti-spam resolutions! They can send inspectors in to verify that all ISP's are complying even! I hear that Hans Blix is looking for work...

    5. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dont know what to say.....it's so stupid.
      I dont want spam and neither does most people I know!

    6. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Informative

      It only costs $5 to submit it online. If you hit the "Register by Mail" button you can print out the form and mail it in for the cost of a stamp and envelope.

    7. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, if it were'nt a profitable business then it wouldn't exist.

      capitalism does work in practice if left to work. this freaking governement interference in the market just wacks everything up and gives the public the impression that the gov't does really do something for them while raping all other rights and freedoms outlined in the constiution.

      guess what, if you don't give people a channel to contact you, they won't. go home and stay inside. stay off the internet and don't get the mail. disconnect your phone and get rid of the cable tv. hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      no, i don't like spam either, but people are going to contact you however you expose your self for contact. email, annoying phone calls, door visits, time share sharks while on vacations. they're all after you and your precious dollar and everything you do to thwart them away will make them find another way to come after your precious dollar.

      when it's a p2p network it's ok to allow unregulated use, some of which might be ok, some might not. when it's a phone network, or an email communication channel, we want to the gov't to protect our rights all to hell? if you don't want spam; don't use email.

    8. Re:Do-Not-Mail by GreyOrange · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So direct marketing asocciation gets all this money to sell my mail address, then asks for five more dollars to remove it...that makes sense?

      --

      Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
    9. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Will there be a fine for those companies who violates the list You referred to(dmaconsumers(slashdotted))
      Good God - someone who talks in LISP!
    10. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most of the big junk mailers are members, as this is their advocacy group. Though I don't see an unrestricted member list, this page tells us:

      The DMA membership roster includes companies like AT&T, IBM, AOL Time Warner, Mellon Bank, Microsoft, Home Shopping Network, The New York Times, Rapp Collins, Prudential Insurance, Phillip Morris, Proctor & Gamble, as well as R.R. Donnelley, Acxiom, Experian and DoubleClick.

      I would be very surprised if the volume of junk mail from large national direct mailers did not decrease noticably a few months after you added your address to the list. You probably will not see a noticable decrease in mail from local merchants and organizations, as these guys are a lot less likely to be able to justify the $1075 annual membership dues.

    11. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just send GBII an anonymous letter saying that all Spammers are really agents of Al Qaeda and wait for the war?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    12. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Funny

      hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      I dunno, man. Those Jehova's Witnesses are pretty persistent.

    13. Re:Do-Not-Mail by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      capitalism does work in practice if left to work. this freaking governement interference in the market just wacks everything up and gives the public the impression that the gov't does really do something for them while raping all other rights and freedoms outlined in the constiution.
      You had barely started talking and already your point falls apart. Monopoly practices? Indentured Servitude? Anti-union practices? Environmental laws? These are all things that are in place because of government.
      guess what, if you don't give people a channel to contact you, they won't. go home and stay inside. stay off the internet and don't get the mail. disconnect your phone and get rid of the cable tv. hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      no, i don't like spam either, but people are going to contact you however you expose your self for contact. email, annoying phone calls, door visits, time share sharks while on vacations. they're all after you and your precious dollar and everything you do to thwart them away will make them find another way to come after your precious dollar.
      I don't pay $35 a month for phone service so I can have a way for people to spam me acoustically. I don't pay $60 for net service so I can get even MORE advertisements for penis enlarging. It's like going in to a store to browse. Maybe I don't want to buy anything, or I'm looking for something specific that they don't have. I don't continuously walk IN and OUT of the store browsing, I do it ONCE and leave. I don't need 50 emails for home mortgages or penis enlarging, or 20 emails for the SAME DAMN PORN SITE, in the SAME DAMN LAYOUT. They could at LEAST try to change the format of the email the next time around.
      when it's a p2p network it's ok to allow unregulated use, some of which might be ok, some might not. when it's a phone network, or an email communication channel, we want to the gov't to protect our rights all to hell? if you don't want spam; don't use email.
      Since when did I agree to be a marketting target? It would be one thing if remove-me-from-further-emails links actually WORKED, because I would just remove myself.
      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    14. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that:

      - it's my phone and I'm paying for the service. With that in mind it's perfectly reasonable to assume that I get to decide who gets to call. If I tell someone to fuck off, then they better damn well fuck off.

      - it's my email and my internet access. I get to decide to can send me mail using the services *I* pay for. In a capitalist society this is a perfectly reasonable expectation. Only a communist motherfucker would insist that I give everyone equal time on *my* dime.

      - it's my mailbox and it's my postal service. The postal service does not belong to spammers, nor do I have any recognizable alternative to said post office. One would think, given no alternatives other than the government agency that I supposedly control as a citizen of the United States, I could dictate an end to spam. Funny, I can't.
      And, by the way, you are *required* to have a receptacle on your property for mail delivery. This is a *law*. Funny thing, that.

      - most of all, it's *my* time. Neither you nor anyone else has any business wasting it unless you're willing to pay whatever fee I set. This too is good capitalism; in fact, excellent capitalism.

      Unfortunately for all of us, capitalism has very little to do with 21st century America. It had little to do with America prior to the 21st century, but even less so now. If we lived in a truly capitalist society I'd actually have the rights I listed above, as a logical extension of the free market. If anything, I'd have even more rights, provided by the tooth-and-nail competition of competing services all tripping over themselves to steal away customers, with the elimination of harrassment by low-life scumbags as a selling point for those services.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    15. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Those Jehova's Witnesses are pretty persistent."

      You can get rid of them, too. Just draw a chalk outline of a body outside your door/cave/whatever, and scatter some JW pamphlets around. Then you can sleep all day if you want to.

    16. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

      tell me the time or to tell me to fuck off

      It's 12:45 p.m. And fuck off, already.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  3. In Addition: by Jonsey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, the US government reccomended that citizens begin using their phone-based registration system: Allowing the government to levy a $11,000 tax on all who wish to be added to the do not call list.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  4. If this were for e-mail... by DreadSpoon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The gov't would call us up offering the service, to block telemarketers! /me deletes another "block unwanted spam" message from his INBOX...

  5. Woo Hoo by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looking forward to saving 15 bucks a month getting rid of Privacy Manager and caller ID.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  6. 11,000 dollar fine? by huckda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by gwernol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

      But that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money - which is a significant amount. The last thing you want the legal system doing is encouraging illegal activity...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    2. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the thing. You set up the list. Then you advertise the fact that you have the list. Then you set up a mechanism to have people report violations. Then set up an investigation team to investigate these reports. Hire a bunch of agents to make arrests and provide them with guns and bullet-proof vests. Now hire the lawyer to do the prosecution and all the appeals. Now hire another lawyer to get a garnishment or lien or whatever it takes to collect the money. Then you can have the $11,000.

      I don't have a problem with this law. But only if it pays for itself. I'm not willing to have my taxes go up just so I have a few less hangups on my answering machine.

      Also, $11,000 isn't too bad, but $11,000 per call is just ridiculous.

    3. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by swv3752 · · Score: 3

      Personally, I am in favor fees so high that it would bankrupt any company for violating the list.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  7. Stunning by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny
    Even if they are following in the footsteps of many state governments, this is an astoundingly good thing. The list here in Indiana has worked remarkably well.

    The only change I'd make would be to forgo the fines in favor of treating telemarketers as "enemy combatants."

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  8. Age of "Don't Bug Me"?? by baloo914 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we encoutered several evolutionary steps in the last few hundred years. "age of reason", "industrial revolution", etc.

    with the dawn of spam email officially being attacked and now the phone solicitors, are we stumbling upon the "age of stop bugging me" or the "age of leave me alone, I don't need more sexual stamina"??

  9. 11.000 $ for .. by teemu.s · · Score: 2, Funny

    one false call .. you can afford lots telephone sex calls for that ..

  10. Useless by krray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There HAVE BEEN "Do not call" lists for many years.
    The phone still rings.

    There HAVE BEEN "Do not mail" lists for many years.
    I get more and more junk mail.

    We all know how many "Do not email" lists exists.
    Regardless of action the spam keeps coming.

    How about a "STAY OUT OF MY FACE AND GET A REAL JOB/LIFE" list to cover everything. Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

    1. Re:Useless by derch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Add a line to your answering machine message telling solicitors to put you on their 'Do Not Call' list. I did it a month ago and the number of calls and messages has gone from four or five a day, sometimes four or five on hour, to one every two or three days.

    2. Re:Useless by FrEaK7782 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The hard part is when you attempt to be polite. If you aren't rude and hang up on them, they take that as a "Ya! Send me a bunch of shit for $100's". I was polite to one guy. He didn't even ask if I was interested. Because I hadn't hung up on him he started putting my information in to the computer to send some "free" trial.

      If the telemarketers acted like decent human beings and followed some phone etiquette, a simple "No thanks" would work. But most of them don't accept that. They keep going "but why don't you want it? it's free!". Bastards...

  11. Why $11,000? by dmomo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am not complaining about a penalty. But why so much for EACH offense? Is $11,000 arbitrary, or is there some reasoning behind it? Where does the money go, and what is it used for? It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

    1. Re:Why $11,000? by mhore · · Score: 5, Funny

      11,000 shall be the number, and 11,000 shall the number be. 10,999 is too low, and not the number, and 11,001 is right out.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    2. Re:Why $11,000? by cmburns69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In business and politics, money talks. When you fine a corporation, you have to get them to notice. If the fine were small, the law would be ignored.

      I believe a large part of this money is supposed to go back into keeping the DNC database running.

      And yes, I work for a business in the industry (well, teleresearch, but still annoying)

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    3. Re:Why $11,000? by mactov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about spending the revenue from the fines on a series of public-service announcements and ads reminding people that the best prevention for these things is for them to produce no results? The big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that every now and then someone actually does buy something and encourages them.

      Aside from a few very lonesome shut-ins (who are victims of this sort of stuff, not genuine consumers) I don't know of anyone who likes getting spam or telemarketing calls.

      --
      OK, now what?
    4. Re:Why $11,000? by StarFace · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will cost money for the companies to stay up to date on the no call list. While a smaller fine will keep the smaller businesses in line, the larger businesses would soon discover that it is cheaper to spend a little less time keeping up with the list and make the occasional mistake. With a much larger fine like this, it would discourage slacking off in even the larger marketing companies and departments.

      --
      V
    5. Re:Why $11,000? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about spending the revenue from the fines on a series of public-service announcements and ads reminding people that the best prevention for these things is for them to produce no results?

      Please... Don't we have enough lies on the television. Smoking pot causes terrorism and signing up for free newspaper trials causes telephone solicitation! Maybe we should have a commercial about how staying with abusive husbands causes spousal abuse too.

      The best prevention is a strictly enforced law.

      The big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that every now and then someone actually does buy something and encourages them.

      No, the big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that they're annoying! The reason they exist is not because someone buys something. The reason they exist is because there's a new idiot looking to make money fast born every minute.

  12. Happy Dude by hoopyfroodman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay. Eternal happiness is just a dollar away." 'Happy Dude' Well, I guess Homer's marketing scam won't work anymore.... drats! There goes my retirement plan. :(

  13. Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't wait for this to go live... then I can disable my $5/month Telemarketer block via the phone co. It's only about 90% effective.

    BTW, here is the FTC's current attempts at curtailing E-mail SPAM .

    It really is amazing the amount of trouble and money we all have to go through to rid ourselve of this plague of unwanted advertsing. Seems like it should be illegal, don't it?

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Nice! by Hellkitty · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Caller ID has been working 100% for me for the past few years, and it only costs $1 a month. It is quite simple - if you show up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller", there is not possibly anything that we have to talk about. You know who I am when I pick up the phone - I need to have the same information on you before I determine if I choose to communicate with you or not.

      I'll sign up, but I doubt that it will work too well. I did a little bit of telemarketing work while in college for some beer money, and let's just say that the place I worked for would not give two shits about this fine. I think they really stretched the boundaries of the law, and they'll probably find a way to do so with this. Enforcement will be difficult. If they call me even though I'm on the list, they are banking on the fact that I don't care enough to follow up on it. And if one call gets through to you once every six months, are you really going to be enraged enough to file a complaint? And once you do file the complaint, you know it will be caught up in beauracratic BS for quite some time before any action comes out of it.

    2. Re:Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, this is a sort of caller ID that spits the telemarketers a canned message if there number is on the phone companies list.

      I wouldn't feel safe not answering all of the "Out of Area" and "Unknown" calls... who knows maybe it's your wife from a pay phone after her car broke down. Shaite happens.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Nice! by feldsteins · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The main problem with caller ID is that it often works like this:

      1. Phone company charges you for a great new service allowing you to see who's calling, thus eliminating the need to speak with telemarketers.

      2. Phone company charges telemarketers for the ability to mask their number from the caller ID units.

      3. Phone company charges you for a new ANTI-anti-missle....

      and so on.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    4. Re:Nice! by nherc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Okay, so she forgets her cellphone or the battery is dead and you go about your business forgetting to check the message after seeing it's "Unavailable". :)

      Point being... just because you came up with "solutions" to that problem doesn't mean you'll never miss an important or wanted call just going by the CallerID.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    5. Re:Nice! by smartin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, caller ID can give you a reasonable indication that the call is not worth answering. The problem is that you've already got up from what you are doing to go and answer the bloody phone only to find that it is not worth answering. Personally at that point i'm pissed enough to either answer and chew them out or answer and jerk their chain by wasting their time in some manner. My current fav is to just say hang on while i get the person whose name they ask for and leave the phone off the hook for a while.

      As for enforcement and getting people to report abusers, that's easy. The govt should just pay the victim a portion the fine. Give me $500 of the $11k and i will persue it every time.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    6. Re:Nice! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      FTC's current attempts at curtailing E-mail SPAM.

      Please, don't refer to email spam in all caps. SPAM(tm) is a trademark of Hormel Foods, who have been quite good-natured about the use of the term to describe bulk email.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    7. Re:Nice! by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Then your PBX admin should set it to send a valid number. Don't whine because you're set up wrong.

    8. Re:Nice! by Eraser_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A contracting partner of mine has a thing which says "I do not accept calls from telemarketers. Push 1 to connect, or enter your phone number so the call can be screened, and have the number added to the accept list".

      I can call him on my cell phone and home phone because Call ID works, but from a friends house with no call ID I have to hit 1, and then it rings.

  14. Too Bad Enforcement isn't moved up... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Enforcement will still only begin in October, and even then with the way it is written, the telemarketers will not need to actually look at the list until January 2004, as they only need to check against the list once every 3 months.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  15. A sigh of relief by andyring · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Finally, this idea is taking hold. I'll admit it does run a bit contrary to my conservative, smaller government, pro-business beliefs, but on this issue, I agree, this is the right thing to do. Of course, we'll hear a bunch of whining and moaning from the telemarketers about how it will hurt them. And, quite frankly, I don't care. Their calls harass me enough that I think it is worth it.

    I worked at RadioShack for six months a few years ago, and we were supposed to try and push additional things on our customers (cell phones, batteries, cables, more cell phones, and cell phones again). I hate suggestive selling. I hate doing it and I hate it being done to me. If I want it, I will buy it.

    If I want info on refinancing my home, new windows, fixing my credit, buying a coupon book, getting another credit card, etc., LET ME SEEK IT OUT. I despise the thought that others (aka telemarketers) believe they know what I want or need better than I do. I am perfectly capable of deciding what products or services I wish to purchase, so let me decide on my own without invasive selling.

    1. Re:A sigh of relief by ebh · · Score: 3, Funny

      The worst suggestive sell: I went to one of the Big Three Burger Chains once, ordered my heart attack on a plate, and the poor sod behind the counter asked, as he was required to do, "Would you like HOT CRISPY FRIES with that?" No, I want COLD SOGGY FRIES, just like I got the last time I was here.

  16. I want on a "Please Call Me" list by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    It gets kind of lonely here in my basement playing Quake and massaging my mom's feet.

    1. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by gid · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

    2. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

      303-499-7111. Call now for a REALLY good time

      --

    3. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by rherbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those of you wondering what this number is, it's the time of day number at NIST.

  17. My Problem with This by moehoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Telemarketers do not follow current law. Very rarely do I get them to tell me their name or company name, let alone a manager name or address. 80% of them hang up when I ask to be placed on their DNC list.

    If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

    And in terms of the phone companies, they see the law and fines as just another expense in a risk/reward scenario. Slamming has been illegal for many year, but they still do it because the fines do not match the profit they get from it.

    This sounds like a great opportunity, but put me down as a skeptic. If the courts don't swat it down, then it will be simply ignored. The governments (local/state/federal) won't/can't enforce existing law.

    I get up to 10 calls a day. I'm sick of it. My phone and my e-mail has been confiscated by marketers of crap that less then .05% of the population wants or needs.

    Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners. Guard your phone number and e-mail address like you (should) guard your SSN.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:My Problem with This by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

      Because this law is much easier to enforce. Either your number is on the list, or it isn't. There's no "hang up before someone asks to be put on the list." There's no argument about whether or not you're on the list. There's no playing games with different companies selling information to each other. There's no questions of jurisdiction with calls made across state lines. All companies are affected.

      From an enforcement standpoint, if you get a call (after three months or whatever it takes for them to read it), you report it.

    2. Re:My Problem with This by deblau · · Score: 4, Informative
      Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners.

      Sorry. I can't waive my First Amendment rights in a civil contract. I can't waive FCC law through a contract, either. Anyone dumb enough to think that their fine print will get them out of trouble with the FCC deserves the lawsuit I file against them.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    3. Re:My Problem with This by pdhenry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fine print is: any company with which you have done business in the last year (2 years?) can call you even if your name's on the DoNotCall list. So by including your number on the registration you implicitlt/explicitly have given the OK for them to call.

  18. Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by shodson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This new law probably won't matter because it seems like most of the telemarketing calls I've been getting lately have been coming from India. If MCI hires an Indian telemarketing company to call me did MCI break this law? How does this apply to overseas telemarketers?

    1. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by DougMackensie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MCI isn't responsible, but the marketing company (it is at least a skeleton company) who routes the phone calls is responsible for the fines. All the Indian telemarketing companies route their phone calls through the internet to a US based call center. You didn't think they'd really pay for the long distance did you ;)

  19. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hello, thank you for calling me. Pay $11,000. Goodbye, eat a dick, and have a nice day.

  20. Coprorate Influence? by cnmill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wonder how much this is being backed by large corporations with the desired effect of choking off smaller copetitors with smaller marketing budgets?

    --
    How sleepless is the egg, knowing that which throws the stone forsees the bone.
  21. Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Okay, is this going to be like every other governmental agency that comes up with a great idea that will have a three year backlog on complaints. And even if it's not, is there a set definition of "solicitced" phone call.

    If you want to get really technical about it, unless you request someone call you, every phone call is unsolicited. I understand the argument about how if you give someone your phone number then you are granting them basic permissions to call you, but unless you unlist your phone number it has to be assumed that your number is not only public, but an invitation for you to be called.

    For every policy/law/order/decree there is a loophole or a way to get around it. Just a matter or time before this becomes nullified.

    I am not going to be adding myself to this list for the main reason that I love telemarketers. I actually had a gentleman call me last week.

    Telemarketer: Yes may I please speak to Doug.

    ME: May I ask who's calling please?

    TM: This is bob calling about an offer Doug just can't refuse

    ME: I don't think he can, Doug killed himself yesterday , it was so sad he had gone to college and then dropped out to be a professional rollerblader and then after a horrible drunk driving accident he broke his left leg, needless to say his skating career was over. He needed money to pay off all the medical bills so he got a job as a telemarketer selling the stupidest things over the phone and trying his best to make his quota for the night so that he could make it home to shoot up and stop the pain. Day after day he would go to work and realize how low he had sunk and truly began to question his worthiness to society as a whole. I guess he finally realized he was worthless and ate a 12 gauge shotgun shell. Messy as hell, but effective, we're still actually trying to figure out how to clean it all up. And all that just because he had a lousy job as a telemarketer.

    *click*

    Don't know how effective it is, but think of it like as an invited prank phone call where you can fuck with them all day long. Tell them you want to buy all there stuff and give the credit card number of 8888-8888-8888-8888, which you know is your number because you ordered one off of the TV and that's the number that was on it. Or just really play with their heads, tell them you want them to seduce you into buying their product or role play with them, have them call you mr moneybags or something. Ask them out on a date or something, have some real fun, these people abosultely hate their job, trust me, and you can only make it worse for them.

    Don't feel guilty, they called you ... remember?

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Logistics ... by suds · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in UK and most of the calls I recieve are related to double glazing. I got so tired of them started to get back to them in a novel way..here is my typical conversion.

      TM: Hello, could I speak to the house owner please?
      ME: Speaking..
      TM: We can replace all your windows for less than 1500 GBP.
      ME:Oh! thats very interesting..so you sell windows?
      TM: Yes..
      ME: I am in window glass manufacturing business. Would you be interested in bying the glass from us? I will do a very good deal for you...

      *Click*

      and I just laugh and laugh and laugh..

    2. Re:Logistics ... by xTown · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can backfire. I got a call once from a magazine salesman and when he asked me what magazines I liked to read, I said "I don't read too much...since the accident. I just can't get used to using Braille." He said, "Oh, I'm sorry to hear that" and ended the call.

      I now receive solicitations from blindness organizations.

    3. Re:Logistics ... by smartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they Fucking called you and invaded your privacy and peace. Thats why

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    4. Re:Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, they interrupt you at inconvenient times, but that doesn't give you the right to harass them. ... Annoying or not, people still have to make a living.

      You can't go down to McDonalds and start harassing the cashiers there, so why should telemarketers be any different.

      How is it different? Because I have to GO to Mc Donalds, somewhere that I don't hold sacred as my own, and something I would do as my own choice. These people call MY house, they aren't doing it because they are "making a living", they're doing it because they're no talent ass clowns who have nothing more to offer society than sitting on their ass trying to peddle shit wares.

      They want to invade my home then they will feel my wrath, they are an unwanted intruder into my comfort zone and I will treat them accordingly. Since I also take pleasure in tormenting their little souls to the point that they want to reach out and cry, I want them to call. It's a double edge sword, I don't want to be bothered by them, but if I'm bored I will certainly take the time to just mess with their heads every chance I get.

      Obviously you are or know someone who is a telemarketer. Let me get you in on a little secret, once you work telemarketing you are no longer human, you are the scum of the earth and deserve nothing more than a strong kick upside the head and to be placed in the middle of a desert to slowly rot in the sun of dehydration and heat exhuation. Deserving for worthless pond scum as those who work telemarketing.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  22. An interesting incident last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of telemarketers, I got a pre-recorded call last night on my answering maching while I was out. It said to call an 877 number to get more info on this alarm system they were pitching. So I decided to call to inform the person that my state has a do-not-call list that they are obviously ignoring. Funny thing is, I could never get through. For over an hour, all I got was a fast busy signal. You'd think that the morons would at least want to make sure that the marks can actually call in so they can get suckered. Idiots!

    But perhaps some other folks would like to check and see if they can get through. Their number is 1-877-723-3872. If you call, feel free to tell them about the legality (or lack thereof) of leaving messages on answering machines and ignoring do-not-call lists.

  23. How.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....accessable is this system?

    Let's say I'm a business that calls people for a living....SLOMINS SHIELD SECURITY SYSTEMS come to mind, I get bothered by them EVERY MONTH.

    I'f I'm SLOMIN, how do I get access to the DO NOT CALL LIST? Is it an internet resource that I have to check on before I call someone on my cold-calling list?

    Or are the lists that I buy going to be censored with the DNC people taken off of it?

    This makes it difficult to see just who the responsibility falls on. Is it the job of SLOMIN to check who they're calling against the DNC list? Or is it the responsibility of the LIST PROVIDOR to take all of the DNC names off of the list?

    Now I know my company has bought a mailing list to do snail-mail mailings, and we keep that same list around for about a year, and mail to sections of it at different times of the year. Is there now going to be a mandatory refresh time for these lists? Can I only assume a list is good to use without liability for x amount of time?

    For these myriad reasons, I think that prosecution for calling people that are on the DNC list will be next to impossible.

    "well, I got the list from XYZ list co. and they shouldn't have put people on this list that are on the DNC list." - Lawyer A, ANYTOWN USA representing Acme Cold Calling Co.

    "I just gather information, I can't be responsible for filtering out people that are on the DNC list. This is the responsibility of the people using the list" - Owner of XYZ List Co.

    "Let's sue both of them, AND the DNC list providor, one of them is bound to pay up or settle. And this won't cost you anything unless we actually get paid a settlement" -Scummy Lawyer B, of firm Ambulance Chasers Inc.

    Ultimately, I think that this will spell the end of telemarketing (because of COURSE the phone company is going to realize that this is a great opportunity to charge $10 when you activate new service to automatically get put on the list) and more SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM.....(trails off into Monty Python jingle)

  24. Hmm... by GreyOrange · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just glad to know that the telemarkers are not powerfull enough to overide such legistation(plus they probably ticked off quite a few politictions) and that they will be under more control. The one thing that realy ticks me off though is "Some businesses are exempt from the TSR and can still call you even if you place your number on the registry. These include common carriers (such as long-distance phone companies and airlines), banks and credit unions, and the business of insurance, to the extent that it is regulated by state law..."(from ftc webpage)
    and those are the people I am getting spammed by all the time, lousy phone company, I give them money and they harrass me with advertisements of services. I'm not paying to be bothered, just to use the phone. Oh well.

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
  25. State's lists... by pergamon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sure hope this is as effective as the one that Indiana has had in place for a couple years now, which apparently will go away when the federal list becomes active. I haven't gotten a single telemarketing call since I was put on the Indiana list...

  26. Maybe not... by PseudoThink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they'd be opening a nasty can of worms if the general public had a financial motive to get telemarketers to call them. Scenario: you and a friend get jobs as telemarketers, then purposely call each others houses 50 times a day just to rack up profits from the fines.

    Considering we want this system to actually work (creates potential for a similar anti-spam system in the future), it's probably best to keep the system well-designed.

  27. Catch 22 by Brad1138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate telemarketing as much as the next person and am glad to see this list. But I am a satellite Dish installer, I work for a co. that subcontracts for about a dozen different companies. Our biggest client is a telemarketing firm, they probably supply about 25% of our jobs. I would hate to lose that much business. The one thing I repeatedly hear from their customers is "I have been thinking of doing this (get Satellite) for a while now". It seems some people need a push or are too lazy to go the story and check things out.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Catch 22 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's your company's responsibility to make sure it has a diversified client base. Your company created that risk and will have to live with it until it gets more business.

  28. Business idea by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's an idea:

    1) Buy a big block of telephone numbers and direct them all to a single telephone
    2) Put them all on the "do not call" list
    3) But phone by swimming pool. Sit in pool with cool drink.
    4) Wait...
    5) Profit!

  29. It's better that is goes to the government. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That way the government is more likely to enforce the law. If it was up to an individual to enforce it, they would have to spend most of the 11,000$ as attorny fees bringing the telemarketer to court. Not to mention the waste of time and effort. The government on the other hand will go in an all out frenzy after these people, especially after Bush's tax cut, and the government has a lot more power behind it than the average Joe.

  30. $11,000 Question by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does the victim get a portion of this fine?

  31. Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How does this affect someone like myself who owns a small business and makes cold calls as a part of the marketing? I cold call other business people, usually at there place of work, and don't sell anything over the phone, I simply try to get an appointment to meet with the person to talk about their productivity and see how my consulting service might help them. Is there any risk to what I do now? Should I even bother with the DNC list, or is it cool since I'm only calling them at work (doubtful number is on the list) and I'm not selling anything during the call?

  32. Sneaky Telemarketers by psychopenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    None of this really matters since telemarketers are already using semantics to find their way around the current rules. I got a call a while back, and started to run through the junkbusters script.

    tele-loser> "Wouldn't you like it if ?"
    me> "Is this a telemarketing call?"
    ...long pause...
    tele-loser> "No sir, this is a survey!"

    See how the new scam works? It's just a survey, but if you really sound interested they transfer you to a sales person for your convenience.
  33. What is so hard about hanging up? by dbavirt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why we need a law about this. If somebody calls you and you don't want to talk to them, just *hang up*. Easy. Simple. No legislation. No arguments over who got the 11k for the offense. No tax payer dollars wasted. And really, you aren't offending the sales drone on the other end of the line. I screen my calls with an answering machine. This technology has been around for, I would guess, decades, and cost me about $50. I have a very short message on it, and everyone who we want to talk to knows that they need to leave a message. I incur ZERO annoyance from telemarketers, unless you count the amusement at having them try to have a conversation with my answering machine.

  34. How to make a telemarketer go away by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they call & ask to speak with Mr. Stevens, I explain they want the "other Mr. Stevens". As I hand the phone to my son, I tell him to explain all the fun things he did that day, from the detailed slimey booger he picked & where he wiped it, to his favorite & most proud stories about "pooping in the toilet." He is so proud of the shapes he can make. Usually after a few minutes of running around on the cordless phone explaining how proud he was with the details of his day, he comes back & says" they hung up". Imagine the rudeness of some people.....Go figure. More here

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  35. hmm... by Cynikal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions."

    now i wonder if theres any way to extend that to inlaws and ex-girlfriends?

  36. Hidden Law.... by Tsali · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but in a similar bill passed by the House of Representatives this week, the companies get a $12,000 tax break for each offense.

    (Fiction can be fun...)

    --
    This space for rent.
  37. Try calls at 11 pm or later by bildstorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with a lot of telemarketers is that they call at all kinds of odd hours. I mean, if you have friends and family that live carboard cut-out lives and there are never emergencies, you can screen all your calls and be sure to not be woken up. However, I have friends all aroudn the world, and once in a while, they need me at 2 am or so.

    The big issue for me has been the recycling of numbers and fax spammers calling them at any time of night. Combine that with telemarketing calls that are at bad hours because some idiot on the wrong coast pulled up the wrong list, and you're starting to get irked.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
  38. I don't understand organizations fighting this. by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In our state, we recently had a no-call list instituted state wide. The telemarketing groups, of course, fought it tooth and nail.

    What I don't understand, is how they think that they are losing business. If I sign up for the list (which I did), I am stating an unwillingness to deal with a telemarketer already - they haven't lost a potential sale, because there is no way I'd buy from one anyway, and if anything they've saved their call center a bit of time and abuse.

    Even more puzzling are those who choose to ignore the state law and call anyway - like they think I maybe forgot I signed up, or that I'll be so happy to hear about the new windows or whatever they're selling that I'll change my mind.

    Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

    1. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by lushmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

      Probably because there are people out there who can't say "no". Some people can be talked into spending money on pretty much anything. These are the people the telemarketers really want to go after. If a person knows they have this tendency, they would be sure to put themselves on the do-not-call list.

      The people who don't end up on the list probably don't know about it, are suspicious about it, or some other reason... not because they WANT to hear from telemarketers. It's not like watching commercials--telemarketing has no redeeming value for the recipient.

  39. You could try this ... by Bake · · Score: 5, Funny

    You: *Ring*Ring* "Hello?"

    Telemarketer: "Good evening sir, would you be interested in a pre-approved credit card?"

    Y: "Listen, buddy, I'm on the FTC's Do-not-call list. The offense for calling someone on that list is an $11000 fine."

    T: "..... oh ..."

    Y: "Now, I might be able to let this one slide for a special fee of $5000, thus saving you and your company some $6000. Interested?"

  40. Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

    See, that's where you have fun, with the religious nuts. Have a knife covered with fake blood at the door. Tell them they're just in time to help sacrifice the virgin.

    Or open it wearing an outfit like The Gimp in Pulp Fiction. Tell them they're just in time for "Punishment Phase."

    Or, if you're bald, put on a white robe and try to convert THEM...very calmly.

    Or just point a watergun at them and shoot them every time they try to talk. The madder they get, the more you shoot!

    Or answer the door nude. See if they can look you in the eye as you converse about the finer points of being a Jehovah's Witness. Ask them if their religion bans nudity.

    See, there's lots you can do to get some enjoyment outta them!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Reply to everything they say, but answer in either
      # A foreign language
      # Jibberish
      # Elvish, or
      # Klingon

      I dunno man...if you can actually converse in Elvish and Klingon, you have far bigger problems than the JW on your front step.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    2. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, if either of you knew jack about the Bible, you'd know that Daniel wasn't a Christian, since he lived about 600 years before Jesus was born.

      The first century Christians were frequently the victims in Roman entertainment venues. Being torn apart by beasts was just one of the ways they could've been killed. Sometimes they were forced into gladiatorial matches. Untrained and unwilling to fight, the Christians were mincemeat within minutes.

      And as for all of the people that say "do this-or-that to freak out or otherwise ensure that JWs will never come back," all I have to say is, "HAH!" It doesn't work. As a JW, I can tell you that it will never work.

      We check out territories from a library maintained by the local congregation. The territory I check out this week may have been checked out by someone else last week, worked through, then turned back in. I won't know that you've come to the door naked or with a fake knife or any other stunt you've done. The only surefire way of getting us to stop calling at your door is to *ask us not to come back.* We maintain "Do Not Call" lists with every territory in that library, and we respect those DNC lists. Once a year(at the most frequent, usually more like every 2 or 3 years), someone will check back to make sure you haven't moved or that you haven't changed your mind.

      I don't know about other faiths that go from door to door, but I know with Jehovah's Witnesses, a do-not-call list is a non-issue. Just ask. And note that "I'm not interested" or "I have my own religion" is not the same thing as "Don't call back at my house. Write it down. Go away."

  41. Just Imagin by hrieke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone doing the US a favor by writing a program that would use the web to solve this issue by signing up everyone!
    By using the phone company's tools against them- maybe using a PHP program, we could lookup a number in an area code on the online Whitepages, screen scrape the data to fill out the form for the FTC & States.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  42. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To my knowledge the do DNC list applies to automated dialing services, so as long as your dialing the businesses by hand there should be no problem.

  43. that right already exists by DiveX · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 already provides a private right of action where you can collect $500 per violation with there often being more than one violation per call.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  44. Gigantic Loopholes by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are several groups that don't have to abide:

    Long Distance, Airlines, and Insurance companies that are regulated by states and not Fed.

    Organizations you have an "established business relationship" with.

    Companies you've made an inquiry to or sent an application to (for three months).

    Charities

    Political parties.

    Between the shake down by the local Police charities, all those contractors with some nebulous relationship to Sears or my mortgage company, the annual cycles of recorded messages by political candidates, and the phone companies checking to see if I want to switch, its unlikely that I will see any reduction in calls.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
  45. My Answering Machine... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... does all the work for me. Here it is:
    Machine: "Hello?"
    I just let the people talk until they realize I'm not actually on the phone. One time this telemarketer called - one of the ones that just start talking at full speed and don't let you interrupt - and talked for 3 or 4 minutes to the machine whlie we sat and listened while eating dinner. After she had finished talking she asked, "so all I need at this point is to verify that you are over the age of 18... Hello?.. If you don't want to talk just f***ing hang up!" - click.
    I only wish I had saved the message to call them back and tell them how their foul-mouthed representative had raped my virgin ears and that I would never buy anything from them :)

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  46. Ask them if they mind if you record the call.. by Torqued · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've started doing this lately when I've gotten a telemarketing call.. A few of them were really caught off guard by it. Most have just hung up the phone.. no one has said "yes" yet! :)

  47. Who isn't covered? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What effect will this have on academic research in the social sciences that uses telephone surveys? Will these still be legal? How about market research calls such as the call I got yesterday about my radio listening habits? Are these still legal? I do know that the list does not cover political calls or calls from non-profit groups, but what else is not covered?

  48. Please do not. by autechre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you abuse this system, then you will be giving ammunition to the telemarketing companies, possibly resulting in the list going away. I, for one, will be more than happy to simply add my own number to this list and be done with it. Let everyone see that it works exactly as intended.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  49. Do not call at work? by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get phone calls daily from people trying to get me to sign up for trade journals and people trying to get me to sign up for their credit cards. It's a big time waster. Questions is, would this do-not-call list work for a business? Or would that somehow mean that other legitimate but unsolicited calls would not be allowed? For instance, a semiconductor company rep that is just calling to check up on things.

  50. This is the greatest news ever!!! by lawaetf1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, I can't think of a single thing that the government has done in the last year to improve quality of life as much as this new reg. The only sad part is that there are going to be those who won't hear about this for years to come. Any millionaires want to sponsor The Last Call to inform Americans about this new option? It'd be an ironic gesture, sure, but it'd also be the noose around the neck for these irritating parasites, may their stomachs roast in Hell forever!!

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
  51. Create specific legal forms of advertising. by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And ban the rest.

    We should only allow advertising to be done in certain places/manners. For example print ads in publications of general circulation, television commercials, product placement in places that consent (presumably for a fee), billboards, vehicular ads (bumper stickers, airplanes towing signs), banner (but not popup) ads on websites, and... that's all. All other forms of advertising, especially "direct marketing," should be illegal, and punishable by prison terms. Their annoyance outweighs the value they provide society. I yearn for the day that the Direct Marketing Association is a criminal organization, delegated to the likes of NABLA.

    Commercial speech can be highly regulated, so as long as the message (buy my product!) can get out, there's no first amendment problem per se.

    If I have not asked you about your product, you have no right to tell me about it. If it's good and I want it, I'll find out about it and possibly buy it. Word of mouth is the only truly legitimate form of advertising.

    I concede that I'm quite radical on this issue. I despise all marketing. As Bill Hicks said... if you are in marketing, kill yourself. ("ooh, he's going for the anti-marketing dollar, clever!")

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  52. Before you sign up - check the exceptions by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Informative

    Section 310.6 in the original rule has a page or so of exception clauses, and they are cross-referencing and unclear, but charitible organizations such as religions and your local FoP chapter will be exempt. If these exceptions are anything like the exceptions in my state's do-not-call list, signing up will just put you in EVERYONE's marketing database.

  53. Telephone Terrorism by vudujava · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wish I had seen this story earlier.

    I honestly don't believe that this will work simply because telemarketers are getting more and more agressive already and will break other rules in order to conceal their identity.

    For the past two months, my wife and I have literally been terrorized by someone soliciting something. They call our home phone hourly from the hours of 5:00pm to 10:00pm, 7 days a week AND hammer her cell phone as many as 20 times a day. They are always in search of my wife (no, she doesn't have any outstanding bills). She bailed and changed her cell number despite the fact I begged her to work with me to get these bastards. Now they only call my home number and hang up whenever I answer. The always refuse to identify themselves until I verify (or my wife verifies) that I'm the person they're looking for (they want my wife's last four), of course, we've continually refused. These ass-clowns only give first names, claiming under the law that's all they're required to do. They refuse to identify their organization. Refuse to verify or decline whether they have prior business with my wife, and finally, they refuse to say where they got our number. I have repeatedly told them to put my number on their do not call list, and they laugh and often get abusive. It's gotten to the point where I sexually harrass them when they call, until they hang up. Of course, as I've said, they won't talk to me now.

    I'm filing a complaint with my local police department this week (as instructed by SBC who refuses to help me without police intervention - bastards). I'm sure that this won't be the end of this, or telemarketers. I'm dumping my land line once this is over and blocking all unknown numbers coming in on my cellphone (I think there's a service from my provider). Fuck it, I'm white listing everyone and everything. The only phone number I'll put down on any ap going forward will be my local police department.

  54. Ironic Banner Ads by BigT · · Score: 5, Informative

    The banner ad I received at the top of the comments page was for telemarketing services and lists. I find this highly amusing.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  55. Laws are nothing without enforceability by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2

    Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions.

    They'll only face it if the recipients of the calls can identify them. Since nearly all telemarketers hide from Caller ID, and no violator will willingly give you identifying information so you can report them, the law is completely unhelpful.

    Let me know when the courts pass a law requiring the phone companies to eliminate Caller ID hiding entirely from their networks. 100% accountability for actions. Then we'll be getting somewhere.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  56. And don't forget ... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Funny

    Y: "Now, I might be able to let this one slide for a special fee of $5000, thus saving you and your company some $6000. Interested?"

    T: "Umm, that was expensive"

    Y: "Well, if you don't have the money right now you can pay it in ten _easy_ installments of only $500 at a miniscule interest rate of 1,25% per month plus fees"

    T: "I'll have to take it up with the manager"

    Y: "Deal now and I'll give you a special price worth $100, deducted from your charge. Special offer, just for you my friend!"

    T: "Oh, really. That's a deal then"

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  57. that is correct by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Punitive damages should go to the state -- they are intended to prevent the company from doing something again, and so there's no reason the person injured deserves them. Actual damages should of course still go to the person who suffered the damages, but you shouldn't be able to get rich off personal injury lawsuits, for exactly the reasons mentioned in this thread.

  58. Typical Telemarketing by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We would like to give you a free edition of the newspaper
    no thanks, get a free one online please remove me from your list

    We would like to replace your auto glass on your windshild
    No thanks, I down own a car. Please remove me from your list.

    We would like to replace your existing windows with vinyl ones
    No thanks I prefer glass. Please remove me from your list.

    But vinyl windows make your home look pretty
    I don't own a home. Please remove me from your list.

    We notice that you recently refinanced your home
    I don't own home. Please remove me from your list

    We are accepting donations for this organization household items
    This is isn't a house, it's a tiki hut. Please remove me from your list.

    We would like to save you on auto insurance
    Don't own a car. Please remove me from your list

    We are accepting donations for this worthy cause
    I don't donate over the phone [isolated cases they get my moolah already] Please remove me from your list

    We want to offer you a free home security system
    Don't own a home, please remove me from the list

    But we can install it in your apartment
    no you can't, I won't let you please remove me from your list

    But there have been alot of break ins in your area, you need one
    Yes, and those breakins those people who purchaced your system

    But why would anyone turn down our free home security system
    Because some people actually make their purchacing choices based on product research rather then impulse buying. Accepting your free product locks the person into a service contract and no one with one gram of sence would do that without doing any form of research. Additional, i'm not going to give license to some guy who I don't know to drill holes in my walls without there being a legit contract for the install. If I choose your service, and you guys fuck up, I want you to pay to have it fixed. You are not qualified to answer any logical question because the company you work for doesn't even give you paperwork or a model number of what you are selling. Your sales staff who will knock on my door are not welcome, I don't want to speak to them. Please remove me from your list, I have not accepted your free product for 7 years. Please give up and find someone else to bug

    I would THINK after repeated failures they would take the hint and actually remove me from the list. I'm not profitable to telemarketers, I don't buy crap sold to me over the phone.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.