Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Manned Space Flight Set For Autumn

brandido writes "According to an article at Space.com, "Chinese space officials remain on schedule for the first piloted flight of that nation's Shenzhou spacecraft. Chief designers and mission directors say Shenzhou 5 will be launched in autumn, reported the People's Daily last week." Between this, the X-Prize, and multiple launches of Mars probes in the last few weeks, it looks like the space race may be heating back up?"

61 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. let's get ready to rumble! by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's like my dad always said, "a little competition never hurt anyone."

    look at the last time the US had a space race, we achieved what many call the greatest achievement of mankind, we landed on the moon.

    Mike

    1. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by goldspider · · Score: 2, Funny
      "we achieved what many call the greatest achievement of mankind, we landed on the moon."

      ...or did we?

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree about a little competition never hurting, but I think the greatest achievement of mankind could be any one of these:
      1. Not blowing up the whole world yet
      2. Moveable type and its' consequences (books, replication of knowledge, etc)
      3. Penicillin
      Once manned heavier-than-air flight was demonstrated, going to the moon was pretty inevitable, but would have been impossible to achieve w/o either of the first 2 items :-)
    3. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by el-spectre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a slight difference between a 100 foot flight in a light aircraft, and launching a 7 million pound rocket, I think.

      I am still amazed that we went from 'can't fly' to 'can land on other astronomical bodies' in less than a lifetime.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by bravehamster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just because an achievement was dependant upon earlier advances does not lessen its greatness any. Indeed, it would be better to say that Man landing on the Moon represented the pinnacle of human achievement to that point, the result of thousands of years of single achievements put into focus by a unique moment. The only thing I can think of that will trump that is when we create our first extrasolar colony and ensure the long term survival of the human race, regardless of what happens on Earth.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    5. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Troll
      There's a slight difference between a 100 foot flight in a light aircraft, and launching a 7 million pound rocket, I think. I am still amazed that we went from 'can't fly' to 'can land on other astronomical bodies' in less than a lifetime.
      The fact that it was done in under a lifetime shows that it wasn't such a big stretch after all. thanks for (inadvertently) proving my point :-)
    6. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and it should of course be noted that dogs made it into space before humans.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it's like my dad always said, "a little competition never hurt anyone."

      Depends on the nature of the competition.

      For example, insanely stockpiling nuclear weapons nearly destroyed all of us. Even the Space Race involved fatalities that might have been averted if it wasn't a race. Today, any number of faulty products are shipped before they are ready in the name of competition. Athletes destroy their own bodies to seek a little bit of competitive edge.

      Point is, history has indeed shown that humans perform well under competitive pressure. However, competition doesn't always bring out the best behavior among humans.

    8. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I certainly don't want to diminish the importance of heavier-than-air flight, but I just have to be a twit and point out that people have been flying in balloons since the late 1700s.

      What really amazes me is how soon after the historic flights of Alcock and Brown, and of Charles Lindbergh, it became comparatively safe and routine to fly across the Atlantic.

      (I know my comma placement sucks, but I'm too tired to fix it.)

    9. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, if you need more obvious proof. ;)

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    10. Re:let's get ready to rumble! by HydeMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am more impressed that Al Gore hasn't taken credit for any of these great acheivments!

  2. Wow ... by jmays · · Score: 4, Funny

    and to think ... they all have accomplished so much even without the support of N*SYNC. Amazing.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  3. This is great news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...because the astronauts on the space station have been hungry for delivery for weeks.

    1. Re:This is great news... by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Funny

      problem is, they'll be hungry again about an hour after they've eaten...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  4. I hope they are serious about space by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and I really hope everything goes perfect for them.

    Because it seems that China will be the only hope for real advances in space. The US program will never gear up to what it is supposed to be at.

    All I know is the thing that may do it, is china placing a moon base just might get the attention of the tubs of idiocy that sit in the congress and house of represenatives....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I hope they are serious about space by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US is hindered by a major factor; MONEY. I'm certain that technology is not a problem. NASA and its U.S. contractors are going to be paid a lot more than their China counterparts. With the US budget deficit in the trillions, the government has to be convinced that a space race is worth funding.

      --
      --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
  5. if there is not a race to mars by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then I don't know what else could get NASA moving again.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  6. Santa! This is what i want! by eugene_t00ms · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully the Chinese pushing forward with developing their own space program might give NASA, ESA, and Multi-national Corporations the kick in the ass they need.

    can't wait to be able to say "We live in a world where a Chinaman has walked on the Moon." can you? :-|

    --
    Belief that Perspectives matter more than Facts = Mark of the Truly Ignorant
  7. Space Race Heating Up? by SanLouBlues · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, it definitely is. Only this time, it's the Capitalists vs. the Communists. Oh wait . . .

    1. Re:Space Race Heating Up? by Ryu2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      FYI, most sectors of China's economy are now largely capitalist and market-driven, in the wake of economic reforms that Deng Xiaoping instituted in the late 1970s.

      Perhaps you meant to say "Multiparty Democracy" vs. "Communist" government.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  8. Those wacky Chinese! by Universal+Nerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let the superpopulation of the moon begin!

    Huh huh...

    --
    Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
  9. Race may not be a good thing by addie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although the manned space program has been ridiculously successful in terms of preventing accidents, there have been 3 instances where small decisions have led to fatal mishaps. The Apollo launchpad fire, the Challenger, and of course Columbia. The more times we attempt these types of activities, the more accidents we will have. That said...

    I'm a space junkie, I love reading about anything exploration related. But national pride is not a good excuse for spending billions to go into space. Should we be celebrating the Chinese, or asking them why they aren't instead working on a way to contribute to the ISS program? Europe is heading for Mars news story, and the US has already been there. How many different times do we need to accomplish the same goal under different flags?

    I applaud the Chinese for getting a man into space, this is by no means an easy task. But we have to look at priorities. I'd love to live in a world where competition wasn't the driving reason to succeed!

    1. Re:Race may not be a good thing by msheppard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only reason you are alive is becuase your ancestors were competitive and won.

      I am referring to the single celled organisms that COMPETED with the other single celled organisms and won. Then they formed multi-celled organisms and kicked the other multi-celled organisms butts (well, what was going to become a butt eventually)

      So you say: "I'd love to live in a world where competition wasn't the driving reason to succeed," and to be blunt, there is no life if we don't compete. At least not as we know it.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    2. Re:Race may not be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ironically YOU wouldn't exist if all the cells in your body didn't cooperate with each other. The real evolutionary steps came when there was cooperation: single cells forming multicellular organisms, animals forming groups, people forming tribes, etc. Competition only holds the status quo; it keeps things in a kind of entropy until the next big step forward.

      Alone I can build a house. We together can build a city.

      Furthermore, do you know what we call something that is so over compeditive that it cannot do anything BUT compete with everything?

      Cancer.

    3. Re:Race may not be a good thing by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lynn Margulis (famous microbiologist [and first wife of astronomer Carl Sagan, incidently]) wrote an article about what she rates as the five most dramatic steps forward in the evolution of life on Earth. I don't remember the whole list off the top of my head, but it included things like "motility" (going from just floating to moving under ones own control is a far bigger advance than, say, flying, which is just a refinement of motility). All five were not the result of competition but cooperation between formerly seperate organisms. Cooperation has brought about the biggest advances in evolution, competition has done nothing but refine the efficiency of existing designs...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Race may not be a good thing by mikerich · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If I remember correctly, the Soviet Union is strongly suspected to have covered up deaths of astronauts.

      Sorry, that was a myth put out by the Americans to make the Soviets look slipshod and backwards. All of the supposed cosmonauts who were killed before the flight of Yuri Gagarin have been found to be fictional and all of the flights since then have been accounted for.

      The Soviets have lost 4 men in space and no more. They were Vladimir Komarov on Soyuz 1 on April 24, 1967. Soyuz 1 flew well before the ship was ready, it was known to be faulty, but Brezhnev insisted that it was launched to keep up the pace against the Americans. Soyuz 1 suffered a series of faults ending in her parachutes becoming entangled, she crashed to Earth killing Komorov instantly.

      The second group of fatalities were Georgi Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov, and Viktor Patsayev on-board Soyuz 11. They were the second crew of Salyut 1, the World's first space station (Skylab was second). After 23 days in orbit, Soyuz 11 returned to Earth, but a pyrotechnic malfunctioned during separation of the orbital and re-entry modules; an air valve was stuck open and the module gradually depressurised. The ship landed automatically, but the crew were found to be dead when the capsule was opened.

      And that's it.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    5. Re:Race may not be a good thing by JohnsonJohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the idea of evolution as an endless ass kicking contest holds sway with the Ted Nugent crowd it is neither rational nor an accurate protrayal of evolutionary processes. In the Darwinian sense competition is really a struggle of an organism against its changing environment. As the environment changes the organisms best capable of dealing with the changes survive. This is counterbalanced by the increased rate of reproduction that organisms closely attuned to a very specific set of environmental conditions can achieve. Hence, smaller mammals with lower caloric requirements, warm blood, large broods, short generations and omnivourous diets are better able to survive a cataclysmic event like the nuclear winter like event that ended the reign of the dinosaurs. Furthermore direct competition between species is rarely observed. For example, a lion will rarely go out of its way to attack a leopard unless the lion is near starvation and the leopard has recently made a kill. If the lion is such a poor hunter that it needs to steal food to survive it will probably not be able to reproduce as it will starve to death when the leopard leaves its territory and no other creature will provide food for it to scavenge.

      The primary force driving evolution then is the external environment. Direct competition generally occurs only within members of the same species but rarely leads to speciation. Also, direct competition usually is related to sexual (as opposed to asexual) mating and not all organisms that reproduce sexually compete directly. For example male songbirds "compete" by being considered more attractive than other birds (a situation that is mostly a result of genetics although diet and other environmental factors also play a role). In modern human society the ability to kick butt does not generally enhance the chances for reproduction. In the US being wealthy and buying a large house can help in the mating game, but unless you are a boxer or hockey player it is doubtful that butt kicking is going to help one gain those sexually advantageous items.

      To extend this analogy to the space race although personally I find stretching biological facts into epistomological facts about the world in general as pointless as deriving philosophical truth from quantum mechanics. Commercial space interests such as the X-prize contestants are generally looking to develop technology to the point where low earth orbit becomes cheap thanks to economies of scale. National space programs however tend to be more interested in prestige building programs: such as putting people in orbit, landing on the moon, and interplanetary missions which will not necessarily make achieving low earth orbit economical. Therefore there is room for cooperation between those who want to make space cheap and those who want to push the boundaries.

  10. Also in the news: by Rxke · · Score: 2, Informative

    on spacedaily.com : Arianespace, Boeing and Mitsubishi Heavy Plan alliance. By the way, Arianespace is already planning to work with the russian Proton guys... Looks like this kind of cooperation could be interesting in the long run for bigger projects, if this works out, a multi business way of thinking for e.g. future Mars missions wouldn't be looked upon as farfetched as it used to be (today, that is)

  11. Re:Article Text by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...capability of launching humans into anal orbit and returning...

    Oh god no....... not that!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Space race by aplank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A wise man once said "Space should not be a race It should be a journey" :-P

    1. Re:Space race by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So instead of saying the space race is heating up, we should say "It looks like the space meander is idling on luke-warm"?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  13. Unmanned flight is cheaper by viniosity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a lot to be said for unmanned flight. Just because the Chinese are getting ready to send a manned spacecraft up does not mean that we should assume that this race is good. In reality it costs a LOT more to send a manned flight into space (safety concerns). That's money that might be better spent in other places. I can understand if lots of you are skeptical about it given where Congress chooses to spend money. Still, I would think that it might be worth a pause before deciding this is a race we need to win.

  14. I hope not by slam+smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it looks like the space race may be heating back up?

    I sure hope not. The space races of the past did little to foster cats(cheap access to space). And this won't either. It will be like the apollo missions to the moon, flag and footprints and never to return. I want space tourism, industry, and sustainable high level of commerce and privatization. The only one of these three items that has a potential of doing that is the X-Prize, because it fosters private industry not just feed the bueracracy that is NASA or ESA (European Space Agency). And now it looks like China is going to do the same thing. You'll have to excuse me if I'm a little underwhelmed.

  15. Moon by FTL · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you are trying to figure out where the Chinese are headed, all you have to do is look at this picture of a Shenzhou rollout, then compare with this picture of a certain NASA rollout. Creepy, huh?

    I wish them the best of luck.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Moon by LeiGong · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bottom line: There is nothing noble about China's spaceflight plans. So let me get this straight.

      First China will send a few people on the moon.
      Then they'll build a space station. And before we know it they'll have nuclear silos on the moon pointed straight at DC, LA, and NYC. In order to defend the silos against capitalist attacks, China's going to build a few TIE fighters to guard the surround space. Then the next thing you know they'll be sending chinamen on spaceships and attack the US from above the atomisphere. I'm sure that's just the beginning. After the nukes from the moon and the orbital attacks, China is going to colonize Mars and start a real "Red Army." These soliders will be ultra-powerful due to their incredible ability to withstand harsh conditions. Training in low-grav scenarios will also make them faster than any conventional US troops. Then all of the "Red Army" will board a super-large spaceship and spend 2 years flying toward Earth. In their spare time on the spaceship these solider will build ultra-advanced laser weapons and powersuits. Once they land they'll completely wipe our entire Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines, and the Coast Gurade.

      Man, you're right! God help us all should the Chinese ever land on the moon. It'll be the end of us alllllll.

    2. Re:Moon by sohp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Superficially they look similar, but compare the numbers:

      CZ-2F: Diameter: 3.4 m, length 62.0 m. LEO Payload: 8,400 kg
      Saturn V: Diameter: 10.1 m, length 102.0 m, LEO Payload: 118,000 kg(!)

      If you removed the Apollo spacecraft and the 3rd stage (S-IVB) from the Saturn it still wouldn't fit through the CZ-2F's little door.

    3. Re:Moon by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There is a reason the setups appear so similar.

      Indeed. However, the universiality of the laws of physics makes a much more convincing explanation than all the other stuff you went on about.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  16. shameful by Boromir+son+of+Faram · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Slashdot community should be ashamed. This story has only been up a short while, and already I'm seeing references to rockets made of bamboo, astronauts eating freeze-dried dog meat, and even the despicable phrase, "runar rander." This sort of bigotry and racism is unbefitting of one of the most respectworthy technical communities on the web today.

    You are probably all just jealous because you lost your jobs to better trained immigrants, or because you always strike out with the cute Chinese ladies. Sad.

    --

    Boromir, son of Faramir, King of Gondor and Minas Tirith
    1. Re:shameful by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't think this post was about being PC. Being PC is mostly about using euphamisms, and not hurting peoples feelings.
      The type of comments the author referred to are simply bigoted, racist, and ignorant.

      PC is saying things like, "persons of mainland asiatic descent" instead of Chinese. Bigoted is "Chink"
      We're all old enough to know the difference.

      --
      Two Rules For Success:
      1) Never tell people everything you know.
  17. Re:Article Text by Rxke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spacedaily.com claims sources say it will be later, somewhere in december, also rumours go that there's a big possibility for a 2 man crew, or even a 3 men crew, that would be a first in history: first launch attempt, and a 2 (or 3) men crew... i wish them all the luck they'll need.

  18. 2061 by Horizon_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anybody else reminded of 2061? Bring on the monoliths!

    My god it's full of stars!

    1. Re:2061 by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean 2010. And hopefully this mission won't end the same way Tsien did...

  19. Political Space Racing by targo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes I wish the Soviets would have gotten to the Moon first because then Americans wouldn't have had any other choice but to put a man on Mars to save face.
    Either that or a nuclear strike against the USSR (I'm not kidding, there were people who seriously suggested that to the US administration if the Soviet Moon program got too far) because otherwise the political situation would have been intolerable. It's all political, science is a third-rate consideration, and noble goals like actual expansion to the space are not even mentioned. But still, I wish them luck, any step forward for whatever reasons is better than our current self-admiring stagnation (like how long can we hype the moon landing?? It is still the main exhibit in all space-related museums after 35 years!)

  20. Bah, moveable type? by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gutenberg was a wuss who would have frozen to death if it hadn't been for the inventions of Ogg, Bringer of Flame.

  21. How to get the US gummint interested in Mars by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Start a rumour about WMD being stashed on Mars. I guarantee you, a manned Mars program gets major funding! But that would be handled through the Father-errr...Homeland Security Agency, not NASA. _Nothing_ is going to get NASA moving again.

    What else would get the US gummint on the space train: Oil on Mars! I can't see environmentalists being able to make a big dent in a drilling-on-Mars project. :)

    Why is China interested in space? No SARS there. No student protestors, either.

    Still, it'll be good to be able to get good Chinese food while in space. They should open up some restaurants at the LaGrange points and the Moon & Mars. General Tso's Space Chicken! :)

  22. Isn't this a Soyuz? by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Shenzhou spacecraft looks just like Russia's Soyuz space vehicle - bummer.
    When are we going to get some new space vehicles, damnit?

    Zzzzz.....

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    1. Re:Isn't this a Soyuz? by mikerich · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes it is a heavily modified Soyuz. They got it because Soyuz is cheap, simple, tough as old boots and does the job. And the Russians needed the money - sounds like a perfect match.

      Don't forget Soyuz was never just intended for one purpose (like Apollo), it is a family of spacecraft that can be configured to several purposes - including, had the Soviets been able to tame their N1 booster, fly around and orbit the Moon.

      In many respects Soyuz was far superior to the Apollo capsule, so it makes a great start for a country with limited resources to get into the manned space program.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    2. Re:Isn't this a Soyuz? by axxackall · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When are we going to get some new space vehicles, damnit?

      I completely against any idea to satisfy your aestetic demands. The spacecraft must do the job - fly up or land down. Safily (not like Shuttles). As for today, Soyuz design is the proof of safity (comparing to Shuttles). Therefore, don't invest money to anything which is more complicated than Soyuz (at least for now).

      Speaking about money. Investment (and ROI!) is the biggest problem in the space industry. I would rather ask:

      When will we have well-profitable space programms, damnit?

      --

      Less is more !
    3. Re:Isn't this a Soyuz? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      From pictures I've seen, the Soyuz spacecraft was definitely much roomier than the Apollo spacecraft, given there are two pressurized sections of the spacecraft. It was fortunate the the Russians were able to overcome the early chequered history of the spacecraft, given the Soyuz 1 crash and the unfortunate air leak that killed the Soyuz 11 cosmonauts. The newest Soyuz T-4 variant owes almost nothing to the original Soyuz design with its interior design.

  23. Red star rising... by macshune · · Score: 2, Funny

    (reuters)-BEIJING-The Chinese government today announced rumors that a manned spaceflight is to take place sometime during the next long while.

    "Yes, the rumors exist. Sometime in the next long while we will start to seriously think about the possibility of putting a Chinese man somewhere above the trophosphere," an undisclosed official with possible ties to the Chinese government presumably stated.
    It remains to be seen if China can make good on its possible intentions to consider manned spaceflight. Only two other countries have done so, the USA and Russia.

  24. Most modern thingy around, for now by Rxke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Consider: Space Shuttle: concieved around 70's, built 80's Soyuz: 60's, minor upgrades, still based on old model. Shendzou: 90's, 00's? Granted, it seems to be based on the soyuz, but Chinese say they built it themselves, and this seems to be the case: it's considerably bigger, more modern electronics et.c. Who would ever have thought that the Chinese would be flying the most up to date spacethingy, it seems absurd, but it's a fact. How the world has changed since the 80's...

    1. Re:Most modern thingy around, for now by dhovis · · Score: 2, Informative

      The space shuttle was actually conceived in the 60's, I think and built in the 70s. The first flights were in the early 80s.

      By the way, the space shuttles have been updated quite a bit over the years. I believe each shuttle has undergone one or two complete rebuilds in their lives. All the old CRT displays were replaced with LCD models, etc. Now, the thermal protection technology hasn't been improved much, if at all, but when Columbia was lost, it was a much different shuttle than the Columbia that was first launched in the 80s. It was the same airframe, most of the rest of it had been replaced.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  25. I vote penicillin by siskbc · · Score: 2, Funny
    3. Penicillin

    Definitely penicillin. Thank God, no more clap!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  26. Re:Welcome ... by Arcturax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually their spacecraft are far more advanced than the Apollo era craft were, simply because there is newer tech today. Have you seen their space control center yet?

    It's awesome! There is a ton of information about their space program here.

    Also, you might want to note that the U.S. is currently incapable of landing on the moon. All the equipment used to do it in the 60's and 70's is too old and most of it can only be found in museums now. The rest is rusting in NASA hangars. If we want to go back, we would be better off developing updated versions of the Apollo craft. So in a way, China has a bit of an edge right now if there was a sudden race to put a base on the moon.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  27. Re:including ... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason why Americans suck at space is cause you are too busy being a racist worldwide, you just don't have time for science.

    </quote>

    Nice generalization. A few points:

    1. I'm not American
    2. Poking fun at our foibles makes us more human, not less. There's a big difference between humor and racism. One's intended for a chuckle, the other for hurting someone.
    3. Most important: Your generalization of Americans as racists is itself a racist generalization.
  28. Been There, Done That by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 4, Informative

    "putting a Chinese man somewhere above the trophosphere"

    A hate to break it to the undisclosed Chinese official, but a Chinese man has already been above the troposphere. We sent him up in the Space Shuttle. He is my former boss, and all around great guy Taylor Wang. http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/wang-t.html

    He is now a prof. at Vanderbilt University, where I worked for his dept. as a student worker for several years.

  29. Who will get to the moon first? by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, since everyone believes they Nasa havent been to the moon maybe we can have a new Spacerace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  30. Aircraft vs. spacecraft. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once manned heavier-than-air flight was demonstrated, going to the moon was pretty inevitable

    Um, no.

    Flight through the atmosphere with heavy craft and launching something into space are almost completely unrelated problems.

    For the first, you need to figure out how airfoils work to produce lift (helicopter blades count in this category), and figure out how to move the air that surrounds your craft to produce thrust. Then there's materials engineering to get the performance to weight ratio nice enough.

    For the second, you have to figure out celestial mechanics, and you have to figure out how to build reaction drives that _don't_ use the surrounding medium to move (as you won't have air around you for much of your trip, and it's more of a hindrance than a help at significant speed). Then you have the herculean task of materials engineering and clever craft design required to get an impulse-to-weight ratio large enough to escape the gravity well (or at least have enough delta-v for orbit). If the gravity well was even a little deeper, we wouldn't have been able to do it with chemical rockets at all (though aircraft would still be easy to build).

    There's a world of difference between a jet engine and a rocket engine. There's a world of difference between something light and strong enough to glide and something light and strong enough to have a 40:1 wet:dry weight and make orbit. It's not a difference of scale - it's a difference of fundamental type of device.

    In summary, please do more research about exactly what's involved in each task before proclaiming that one follows from the other. What actually precipitated _both_ was the industrial revolution, which gave a drastic increase in technology and in materials science.

    1. Re:Aircraft vs. spacecraft. by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was referring to the drive, the curiosity, that would make going to the moon inevitable.

      In which case, it could be argued that once the poets made popular the tale of Icarus, it was inevitable that we would go to the moon.

      Even better (and probably closer to the truth), ever since life evolved intelligence and the ability to dream, it was inevitable that we'd go to the moon...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  31. titan by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Between this, the X-Prize, and multiple launches of Mars probes in the last few weeks, it looks like the space race may be heating back up?"

    Stephen Baxter's wonderful book Titan starts out with the first Chinese manned spacecraft orbit of earth, which does in fact spark a new military build up comparable to the American/Russian era.

    I can't recommend this book highly enough, it is remarkable to me how time and again how close Sci-Fi authors come in their visions of the future of our race.

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  32. Re:including ... by Daffy_Duck_cb · · Score: 2, Funny

    My girlfriend is Chinese (not a citizen of US yet), and she has never eaten dog and never will. If it's fair to make fun of some Chinese people for this practice then it's just as applicable for them to make fun of Americans for storing too many appliances in the front lawn of the double-wide trailer.