Slashdot Mirror


Collecting a Judgement?

rk2z asks: "I did some independent contractor work about 6 months ago. I delivered the software as specified in my contract and turned in the hours that it took. I then sent the company an invoice for $1400 which was based upon my contracted hourly work rate. They had paid me in the past so I didnâ(TM)t do anything like withhold source code until payment. To make a long story short, they refused to pay me and I ended up taking them to Small Claims court in the state of Nebraska. I won a judgment for the above amount. The problem is, Iâ(TM)m not really sure how to go about collecting my judgment. The amount is relatively small so I donâ(TM)t want to consult a lawyer, because it not really worth blowing the entire judgment before I even get it. But it's big enough that I donâ(TM)t want to give up on it."

"I looked a couple of law websites like here and here, but their suggestion were fairly broad.

Does anyone have any experience in going after debtors (without a lawyer if possible)? Is it better to go to a collection agency and blow half the settlement up front? If so does any one know a good collection agency?

Things to keep in mind: [the customer] is a small company (less than 7 employees). They have some property like computers and such, but how do I find out what they own vs. what is leased. Owned property can be seized by the Sheriff and sold at auction. I have tried to contact them about a monthly/weekly payment plan, but have been blown off every time I try to make some progress on the issue. Thanks in advance."

82 comments

  1. Take them back to court by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they haven't paid you then they haven't fulfilled their side of the contract, and they don't own (or otherwise have rights to) the code you wrote. If they're selling/distributing the code that could be a big problem for them as that would be a violation of your copyright, and damages for that are up to $150k per violation. Wouldn't they feel stupid for not paying you that $1400?

    I think I would just talk to the Sheriff, though. I very much doubt that you have to know ahead of time what equipment they own or lease. That's the sort of thing that can be sorted out after it's seized.

    You might also want to contact a credit reporting agency to see how you can put a black mark on their credit report.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Take them back to court by spumoni_fettuccini · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also you may want to try the better business bureau and see what resolution they might be able to provide. Check in your area for mediators, as they may be able to help settle the payment of what you are owed [any legit company would really like to settle/pony up rather than face bad PR]. If you know a Guido or Vinny that may help as well. ;)

      --
      -- Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.
    2. Re:Take them back to court by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's to stop the court from saying "This is a contract dispute, not a copyright dispute, because the contract didn't specify that all rights stay with the author until final payment. The contract issues have already been litigated and resolved, so I'll dismiss this, clear my calendar and look efficient"?

      No, I'm not a lawyer.

    3. Re:Take them back to court by Webmonger · · Score: 1

      Well, a contract can be dissolved by mutual agreement by both parties. I don't know the legalities, but it does suggest that if the author also declares the contract null, (and the company basically has done that already) he can then go after the company for bigger bux.

    4. Re:Take them back to court by il_diablo · · Score: 1

      Because the defacto IP rights are the contractor's, unless specifically stated in the contract. If he did "work-for-hire" (IC work, as stated), it's his IP unless they contract states otherwise.

      Of course, this is the de facto rule. Every place I've read that also says something to the effect of "Don't chance this on the courts. Even though it's yours, SPECIFY it's yours in the contract."

      But he has at least SOME leg to stand on.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    5. Re:Take them back to court by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's to stop the court from saying "This is a contract dispute, not a copyright dispute, because the contract didn't specify that all rights stay with the author until final payment. The contract issues have already been litigated and resolved, so I'll dismiss this, clear my calendar and look efficient"?

      Because by default the copyright belongs to the person who actually wrote the code. The only way that can be changed is through a contract, and if the customer hasn't fulfilled their part of the bargain, the contract doesn't mean jack. Quid Pro Quo is the basis of all contract law, and it means they can't ask you to give something up without giving you something in return.

      The contract issues have been litigated, but they haven't been resolved, and that's exactly the reason it would be going back to court.

      Really, having the Sherrif go in and seize some of their stuff for sale at auction is the best way to go, since that's already specifically allowed for in the ruling. If he wants to really shaft them he can try to have the contract declared null and void due to their non-payment and go after them for copyright violation, but that's more hassle than I think I would want to deal with, and definately requires a lawyer. Another option is to go with a collection agency, but I think I would go back to court first in order to have the cost of using a collection agency added to the damages, although I expect that would have a good chance of being dismissed.

      Then again, I would have asked for more than $1400 in the first place, at the very least adding the court costs (small claims is cheap, not free) and billing for the time spent persuing payment at the contractual rate, including an estimate of the time spent in the court room. After all, they've made that a cost of developing for them, and they should pay for that. I'm betting that would have just about doubled the damages, which would have basically payed for the collection agency.

      Then again, I have the benefit of seeing my dad deal with these kind of things, so I've learned to anticipate these kinds of issues.

      Other options for going back to court are to attach their income (probably called something else in this case, basically having the money taken directly out of their account and they don't have a say in it) or freeze their bank accounts or put a lein on the business. There are all kinds of fun things you can do.

      Non-court options are the Better Business Bureau, which someone else mentioned. I like this one personally, my wife complained to the BBB about the dealer we bought our first car from, who kept jerking us around and trying to change the contract, and the next day the manager was calling up ready to clean the soles of her shoes with his tongue in order to resolve the problem. But then I live in a state where the BBB is actually effective, so YMMV.

      I also like the idea of putting a black mark on their credit report, and I'd probably do that regardless of whatever else happened. That can be death for a company that small, as often the only way they can grow or even survive through slow periods is by having the ability to borrow money.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:Take them back to court by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      If he wants to really shaft them he can try to have the contract declared null and void due to their non-payment and go after them for copyright violation, but that's more hassle than I think I would want to deal with, and definately requires a lawyer.

      The real fun starts if you can prove (or persuade) that the other party negoiated the contract 'in bad faith;' in other words, that they planned to shaft you from the get go.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Take them back to court by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sa lawyer either, but if the contract was not fulfilled then it is void. That would mean the transfer of copyrights is also void. Which means that the author still owns them, not the company that failed to live up to the contract.

    8. Re:Take them back to court by misterpies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if the contract was not fulfilled then it is void

      This is a misconception of contract law.

      What does it mean if a contract is "void"? It means that each party is put back in the same position as if the contract had never existed. So in the current case, the company would give back the code and the developer would give back the money he got.

      However, in this case the problem was that the developer never got any money. The reason he was able to sue on the contract and win shows that the contract is valid. The court ruling was to enforce the contract according to its original terms, not to annul it. Having enforced the contract, all terms in the contract will still be valid, including any relating to IP.

      If the company is refusing to pay up even after the judgment, then it's in contempt of court. That's a criminal offence, so what our screwed-over friend needs to do is threaten to report the company to the local DA. In terms of collecting the judgment, he can try a debt collection agency but they'll take a cut of the winnings.

      What our friend should have done is consulted a lawyer before going to court. If his case was as open-and-shut as it sounds, then there's no doubt that the court would have awarded him legal costs against the company. So he wouldn't have paid a penny for his lawyer, and the lawyer would know exactly what to do to get hold of the money (and would do it quick since he wants to get hold of his money).

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  2. Try this by cybermage · · Score: 4, Informative

    My mother went through this to collect back rent from a tennant:

    After securing a judgement, ensure that they're are notified of the judgement and given a small window of time to pay. After that, engage the services of the county sheriff where they are located. Sheriff's have the authority to seize property to settle small claims judgements.

  3. Collection Service.. by metacosm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Contact a collection service. They take a % of the total (often seems like a large %) -- but remember... getting 80% of 1400 is better than getting 0%, and without professional help that is what you will probably get.

    The collection agency has tools to make life hard for those holding out on you (even before you go to court, with the solidity of a court decision, you should be in an even stronger position).

    Call today -- and forget about it -- just wait for the check. They specialize in this -- and want their % -- they will get the job done, they deal with hundreds of companies like this everyday.

    1. Re:Collection Service.. by Scaba · · Score: 3, Funny

      If by "collection agency" you mean a guy like Nicky Santoro (Joe Pesci) from Casino , then yes, this is good advice.

  4. Contempt of court is no joke by evil_roy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have the judgement, does it specify anything more than an amount? A time frame for example. Here (Australia) these small claims judgements have a time frame - typically 28 days for the payment schedule to be agreed by both parties, failing which the matter goes back to court for a binding ruling. If the debtor fails to pay then they are in contempt of court - a much bigger deal as far as penalties are concerned. Talk to staff at the court - most courts do not like their decisions to be met with contempt.

  5. They May Be Liable for Legal Fees by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know you don't want a lawyer, but face it: lawyers are paid for things like this because they know more ins and outs than you'll ever know.

    For example: You want to attach or seize property. Didn't it occur to you to seize their bank account? (I learned this from a lawyer friend.) They've paid you before. Do you remember their bank? You could actually have the funds in their bank account seized. Then you wouldn't have to worry about equipment and selling it to recoup fees.

    Another point: In many situations like this, if you hire a lawyer to attach, seize, or garnish their account, THEY can be held responsible for legal fees. Think of it: They don't pay, you sue, they ignore it, you hire a lawyer, the lawyer seizes not only your fee (plus, in VA, you can get upto 9% interest per year), but the lawyer's fee is also seized and deducted from their account.

    If this works in your state, then you walk away with your fee and free legal service. They pay your fee and the legal fees for the lawyer that you hired!

  6. The Slashdot way... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Threaten to mention their website on Slashdot. I'm sure a lot of us would be happy to click the link a few times.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  7. Do this by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.

    Furthermore, I have no idea what Nebraska law is like. So there will be things that are different than how I've described them here. Possibly there are additional steps you need to take, or additional things you need to do.

    So don't rely on this.

    Here we go:

    You have a judgment. You need to execute that judgment. Because right now the judgment alone is just a pretty piece of paper. All you are right now is an unsecured creditor. Little more than scum, in the greater scheme of things, no offense. You need to act to raise your status!

    Go to the courthouse, find the clerk of courts, and get a writ of execution (aka a writ fi. fa., or writ of attachment).

    The writ is an order by the court to the Sheriff ordering him to go find property owned by the debtor that is not exempt from execution (such as the clothes on their backs, were the debtors individuals), take it, sell it at auction, keep enough money to handle their own costs, give you however much is left until you have all you were owed, and then the surplus goes back to the debtor.

    Basically, once you've gotten the writ and the sheriff has recieved it, he'll go out there one day in a pickup truck and start taking stuff. Find out when he's going, and go along, so that you can pick out good stuff that is sure to sell at auction for enough money. But make sure that you don't pick out things that are exempt by law; you may need to do some research on Nebraska law to figure this out.

    BE AWARE that sheriff's auctions hardly ever get the full value of whatever's being sold. You may want to find something that you PERSONALLY want, have it seized, then buy it at auction, likely for whatever price you were owed. Then use it, or sell it yourself, or whatever.

    Note that some property is difficult to load in a pickup truck -- land, for example. Don't worry if the sheriff merely declares that he has executed on it, and maybe tapes on a piece of paper to that effect. It's legal, and the debtor will get in serious trouble if he fucks with that property (selling it or damaging it), including, e.g. contempt of court.

    HOWEVER, if the sheriff can't find anything, he will report back to the court (on a document called a return that lists whatever he finds) 'nulla bona.' (at least if he has any respect for tradition)

    Anyhow, once the sheriff got something, you are now a judicial lien creditor BUT IN THAT PROPERTY ONLY. Otherwise your status is unchanged.

    PLUS there are even more fun things you can do.

    Instead of bothering with the writ fi. fa., you may be able to take advantage of your state's turnover statute. This dispenses with the sheriff and is a court order directing the debtor to just give you property in his control, even if not in his posession. And since you can use discovery rules in this process, you can make him tell you, under oath, with penalties for perjury applicable, as to what it is he's got.

    If there is real estate in the county, you might be able to have your lien recorded in the county courthouse. This might also be called abstraction. It places a lien on the real property in the county (NOT personal property; that is, land, not pick-up-able stuff). This prevents him from selling it, since anyone who bought it later, until you're paid off, would basically wind up having to pay.

    Or if negotiations haven't entirely broken down, you could offer to trade your judgment for a security interest in some specific property (you will be much more likely to want a lawyer for this, as all the p's and q's HAVE to be minded) which basically means you'd have a much stronger claim.

    Since, if the debtor goes into bankruptcy, you're in serious trouble. You DON'T want that to happen. It will totally fuck you up.

    Additionally, ACT FAST. There is a sort of pecking order. Firstly, sold property pays court/sheriff's expenses.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    1. Re:Do this by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction."

      Are you a law student or some sort of legal worker then? They're the only ones I've ever seen who really really want to make sure that they are not giving out legal advice.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot Userid: cpt kangarooski
      Real name: Lionel Hutz
      Location: Springfield

    3. Re:Do this by Surreal_Streaker · · Score: 1
      by cpt kangarooski (3773) on Saturday June 21,
      @04:55AM (#6260555)
      ( http://slashdot.org/ )

      Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.

      God help anyone who takes legal advice from cpt_kangarooski!

    4. Re:Do this by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn straight, brother Surreal! Testify!

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:Do this by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      BE AWARE that sheriff's auctions hardly ever get the full value of whatever's being sold. You may want to find something that you PERSONALLY want, have it seized, then buy it at auction, likely for whatever price you were owed. Then use it, or sell it yourself, or whatever.

      I'm slightly confused: Why should you care?

      The way you describe it, it sounds like you get cash calculated after the auction. It doesn't really matter if the sheriff seizes $10,000 worth of junk and sells it for $1,400, or $1,500 dollars and sells it for $1,400...either way the guy gets $1,400. In fact, if the sheriff seizes $10,000 to pay him, it's a bit more fulfilling to know this company that tried to screw him over was itself screwed over.

      Of course, what he does has is the abilty to pick out specific things to auction, and some inside knowledge of the actual value of things...so he should go in, and pick things that look valueless but are actually worth a lot, and purchase them...but he still should act like he's at a normal auction, and pay as little as possible.

      Or, if he's really vindictive, he can pick otherwise valueless things the company needs to operate but aren't exempted by law.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    6. Re:Do this by nathanh · · Score: 3, Funny
      Read this part very carefully: This is NOT legal advice. I am NOT a lawyer, much less a lawyer licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.

      Look, I simply don't get this, and it's pissing me off. Cpt Kangarooski, I'm not pissed off at you, but I'm going to use you as a launching board for my rant. So please don't take any of this personally, especially seeing as your comment was genuinely helpful.

      When there's an article about ANYTHING then everybody is a self-proclaimed expert. Physics? Experts. Astronomy? Experts. Computers? Experts coming out the fucking woodwork. Everybody has an opinion about EVERYTHING on Slashdot and everybody is a freaking expert.

      Yet I don't see disclaimers stating "lack of professional experience" about anything except legal questions. I never see "I'm not a Java developer, so don't rely on this, and for god's sake seek professional help from Bill Joy before acting on these words, but... ". No, what you normally get is a self-proclaimed expert acting as if they were standing alongside Bill Joy and helping him nut out the hard bits. Similarly, if there is a question about evolution or religion (or even worse... evolution *and* religion) then suddenly everybody is both a Nobel Prize winner for biology and the Pope's right hand man. Nobody ever sticks a disclaimer at the start saying "my only experience with biology was in 9th grade HS and I don't even know what an ordainment means".

      So why the double standard for legal advice? Why is that 90% of the comments to this Ask-/. started with "IANAL" or something similar? Nobody is stupid enough to think that you are a lawyer, and even if they are that stupid that's their own damn problem. You're not going to be held liable for bad legal advice given under a PSEUDONYM on a PUBLIC BULLETIN BOARD when NO MONEY HAS EXCHANGED HANDS. Please, no more redundant "IANAL" disclaimers, unless you're going to start saying "IANA CEO OF MICROSOFT" and "IANA PERSON WHO HAS ANY CLUE ABOUT BIOLOGY" as well.

    7. Re:Do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I never see "I'm not a Java developer, so don't rely on this...So why the double standard for legal advice?

      Because it's not illegal to give programming advice without a license.

    8. Re:Do this by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Because it's not illegal to give programming advice without a license.

      It's not illegal to give legal advice without a license. It's only illegal to practise law without a license. There's a fairly significant distinction between the two.

      The interesting cases are when somebody misrepresent themselves. For example if you ring up a lawyer's firm and get free advice from the secretary, because you mistakenly believed that she was licensed, then the secretary is in the shit.

      But if you free advice from Captain Kangarooski on Slashdot then there's not much chance of you winning a claim in court for receiving bad advice. The judge might laugh a little when you try to explain that you thought Captain Kangarooski was licensed to practise law but that's about it.

      Please, no more IANAL bullshit. Unless you start being consistent and prefacing all opinions on technology with IANAE. Because I'm pretty sure most of the Slashdot posters are NOT engineers.

    9. Re:Do this by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Wages -- although not apparently very relevant here -- are really hard to garnish however. Just FYI.

      As someone who has been on the losing end of a lawsuit, I can testify that this statement is very true. About the only garnishments you can't avoid are those done by the government from funds owed to you by the government. Otherwise there are any number of techniques one can employ to avoid garnishments. Sorry, I won't list them here, I'm too lazy.

    10. Re:Do this by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      its very simple, if you had a chance to put
      I anal before a post and get away with it, wouldn't you? i mean, come on, its almost as good as working at the bait shop by the lake, and coming home and telling all your friends you're the master baiter.

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    11. Re:Do this by Naomiah · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is actually a reason everyone qualifies their legal expertise. That is because it is actually illegal to give legal advice unless you are a member of the bar, and people get prosecuted for it all the time.

      Even after I graduated law school, it was still illegal for me to give legal advice, until I received my bar results, and was sworn in.

      Nowadays, I know that part of the reason for the bar is to control the legal market, like a license. But it has always been true that you had to pass a qualifying exam of some sort, even just an oral one. Also, there have been lawyers for a long time, so there is a bit of a secret handshake aspect to it, I am sure.:)

      --
      "Yes, I am a lawyer." - Star Jones
    12. Re:Do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Furthermore, I have no idea what Nebraska law is like.

      Umm, I think it's mostly about cows and barley.

    13. Re:Do this by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is actually a reason everyone qualifies their legal expertise. That is because it is actually illegal to give legal advice unless you are a member of the bar, and people get prosecuted for it all the time.

      If it's illegal then non-lawyers should not be giving legal advice even with the disclaimer "IANAL". However, consider this case:

      One prominent area of the site advertises "Free Legal Advice." That portion of the site states in the preamble: "We are all led to believe that whenever we are faced with some legal matter that we automatically are required to employ an attorney. There are many matters of a legal nature that we can and should resolve on our own without incurring unnecessary expenses of an attorney. Although I am not an attorney, I can assure you that it is not necessary to be a lawyer in order to provide some guidance and/or advice on how to deal with your legal problems."

      He was giving legal advice while admitting to not being a lawyer. He was accused of practising the law without a license. The judgement from the Board ruled in his favour.

      Thus, according to the Board, "the publication of legal advice on Palmer's web-site, good or bad, is not of itself the unauthorized practice of the law."

      So at the very least in this specific case in this particular jurisdiction it was fine to offer legal advice without a license. The Board would have ruled differently if he had crossed the line and started to practise the law.

      Still, it was "troubling" to the Board that Palmer offered to respond to "any questions about your rights" and to "provide you with guidance and/or advice." The Board concluded that "if Palmer actually gave legal advice in specific response to a question from one of his readers, he would have engaged in the unauthorized practice of the law."

      But fortunately nobody on Slashdot ever gives specific responses because the questions lack any specific details.

      Either way, the IANAL is redundant. Either it is legal to give advice in which case you don't need the IANAL. Or it is illegal to give advice no matter how many disclaimers you insert.

    14. Re:Do this by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      -Because I'm pretty sure most of the Slashdot posters are NOT engineers.

      No but most of us have Ausperger's, which is pretty much the same thing.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    15. Re:Do this by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      The most effective way to avoid having your wages garnished is to try to be employed in the tech sector.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    16. Re:Do this by Otter · · Score: 1
      When there's an article about ANYTHING then everybody is a self-proclaimed expert. Physics? Experts. Astronomy? Experts. Computers? Experts coming out the fucking woodwork. Everybody has an opinion about EVERYTHING on Slashdot and everybody is a freaking expert.

      First, I laughed my ass off at that paragraph.

      Second, as a major contributor to both the "Well, let me tell you what I think..." and the "Ask a lawyer, dumbass..." fronts, the explanation is simple. The potential downside to bad legal advice in even a small matter is enormous. Look at the people getting slapped for vaguely facilitating file sharing.

      Clueless statements on other topics ("I don't know how DNA works but I assume it's exactly like C code.", ".NET is obviously better than J2EE because Miguel said so.") are essentially harmless, unless you decide to use them as a foundation for your biotech or web application company. And if you're in the business and you don't realize the idiocy of most of the posts here, you have bigger problems.

    17. Re:Do this by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      It's because maybe he seizes only $100 worth of stuff to try to satisfy a $10,000 debt.

      You really can't just have the sheriff take absolutely everything, unless the debt is at least in the range of what those things would fetch. Seizing gratuituous stuff is basically just mean, and I would suspect you can get in trouble for it.

      Ditto for valueless nonexempt stuff that's nontheless important for the debtor.

      Good faith and fair dealing remain important even in a default situation.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    18. Re:Do this by GreyyGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because you can be sued for giving faulty legal advice. I'm sure that there are logs somewhere that could be traced back to you. I'm sure you feel nice and cozy in your annonomous would, but then I'm sure those poor shmucks that use Verizon and were caught trading files felt that way too.

    19. Re:Do this by haystor · · Score: 1

      Or you could precede your entire set of advice with: "This is what I would do".

      Uh, is this meta-legal advice on how to avoid culpability in giving legal advice?

      --
      t
    20. Re:Do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAN IANA

  8. writ of garnishment by angeles13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    IANAL

    I have gone through small claims court in Arizona. I have won twice. The difficulty is in the collecting. In the first case, no problem. The second case I am still trying to collect on. Fortunately I have the bank account information and in Arizona, I am able to garnish the bank account (except for a certain ammount) for what is owed. It took hiring a private investigator to find out what happened with the case (county recorder's office lost the paperwork -- keep your own copies of everything!!!) Now, I'm back to using the Court Constable for the serving the garnishment.

    Try contacting the Nebraska State Bar for information on small claims court for non lawyers. There should also be somewhere an agency for pro bono work for lawyers. In Arizona, it's Community Legal Services - they have a document that explains in plain English what it takes to go through small claims court and how to obtain your judgement (if awarded).

    Good Luck!

    --
    design is art - art is design
    1. Re:writ of garnishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked as a bill collector for 4 years (in Canada so specific laws and procedures etc. are a bit different I would imagine). But I would say the best route to go is to garnishee their bank account. If you've been paid by them in the past hopefully you still have their banking information. (All you really need to know is their branch, specific acct #s aren't necessary, at least not up here).

      Go down to the court house, get whatever a writ of garnishee is called in your part of the world. Serve a copy to the debtor and to the bank. The bank remits the funds (assuming there is enough in the account to cover it) to the court. The court sits on your money collecting interest for as long as they feel like, and eventually they cut you a check.

      This is the easiest way to actually collect money on your judgement. If that fails then get a writ of execution, contact the sheriff, etc. etc. Seizing property, or placing leins is kinda a last resort kinda thing.

      Or turn it over to a collection agency, pay probably 20%, I would suggest a smaller, local agency that actually deals with legals, not one of the big call centre in india type places like NCO for example.

    2. Re:writ of garnishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked there for a couple years, on the dialer. You're probably screwed if it's in their dialer system. The only thing I would suggest is asking for a supervisor next time you get a call from them and make a big stink. The problem is they hire just anyone off the street and train them to think everyone is a liar, thus wrong numbers are actually debtors in disguise. It's a real bad company, and one of the biggest.

  9. Sell the debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm making the assumption you aren't planning to ever deal with these people again? (heck, it sounds like too many bridges have been burnt for that already)

    In that case, the simplest and easiest way to get your money is to sell the debt to a debt collection agency.

    The agency buys the debt from you, and from then on it is their problem. And these agencies are experts at getting their money back.

    It's harsh, and it's cruel, and I think personally I would struggle with the morality of it, but if you really want the money, and there's no other way to get it, I know that this system works.

    1. Re:Sell the debt. by sribe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IANAL! And you probably need one. But I will say first that I found the post from cpt kangarooski to be quite good. A few comments:

      But make sure that you don't pick out things that are exempt by law; you may need to do some research on Nebraska law to figure this out.

      In Colorado you can basically take it all, and they have 10 days to file with the court to recover exempt equipment. Also in CO "essential" equipment can be exempt. IOW, they have 10 computers, the sheriff takes them all, the court will give them back the 1 with their QuickBooks file. Also make sure you know how much the stuff goes for on eBay, both so that you know how much to take and so you can show up at the sheriff's auction and bid up to that amount, if needed in order to prevent a bargain hunter from buying it all for $10. Be prepared for them to throw a fit, stand your ground, and don't wind up taking only enough stuff to cover 1/4 of the debt (ahem, speaking from experience here). Don't count on this of course, but the sheriff's department told my attorney that it's not uncommon for a company to send someone to the bank, accompanied by the deputy, to get a cashier's check rather than have their property seized.

      It's harsh, and it's cruel, and I think personally I would struggle with the morality of it

      WTF??? Companies know how much money they have in the bank, how much coming in, and what their expenses are. They knew they didn't have the money to pay this guy and let him keep working because they wanted, in effect, to steal his work. Yes, they were probably hoping that enough new sales would close that they'd be able to pay their bills, but they had to know there was a chance they'd wind up screwing him. Now on what plane of reality is there any possibility of a moral issue with collecting the debt?

      I don't know if you have such a mechanism in your state, but if you do a (real) threat to terminate the company is a much bigger stick than garnishing the account - it may be empty, they may just change banks etc.

      Yeah, I'm involved in a long-running attempt to collect from a company that has gone to great lengths to avoid paying their debts (transfer of assets to a sister company in another country, leaving the original US company defunct with all the debts, and forming a new US company with the same executives and employees to continue the development work on behalf of the foreign company). There's no direct way to shut them down, but soon enough they'll find themselves on the receiving end of an action that will force them to pay or guarantee that they'll never be able to sell their product in the US nor get another dollar from investors. The most ridiculous thing is that I've told them exactly what I'm doing, and they're just ignoring me. I guess they think I'm bluffing...

  10. Winding Up Order? by belroth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Caveat: IANAL (I don't even play one on TV)

    Here in the UK a friend was owed money by an agency for some contract programming he had done for them and they wouldn't pay his final invoice. Not couldn't, just wouldn't. As he routinely refers to agents as 'parasites' or 'scum' when in a good mood, he didn't want to mess around and play nice. AFAICR he checked out his legal status first (saw a lawyer about his contract) and then contacted the company threatening them with a winding up order if they didn't pay. This would basically do what it says and end the existence of the agency as an entity - instant extinction, no business able to be transacted etc. - basically a 'nuke the bastards' option, perhaps a trifle extreme but he really doesn't like agents.
    Apparently they laughed at him, but when they shared the joke with their legal staff full payment was made immediately.
    He can be a little over the top, and he would probably have been happy to take the loss so long as the other guys came off a lot worse, I think he was disappointed that they coughed up.
    Did I mention that he doesn't like agents?

    I don't know if you have such a mechanism in your state, but if you do a (real) threat to terminate the company is a much bigger stick than garnishing the account - it may be empty, they may just change banks etc. It could be fun to check if you have the ability to do this.

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    1. Re:Winding Up Order? by belroth · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention you need a debt of £750 to go for a winding up order here (about $1275 at present).

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    2. Re:Winding Up Order? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      In the states, incorporated entities are like gods. They're immortal, except when a goverment or another corporation(greater gods) kills them. This is almost *always* because of some sort of bankruptcy issue, their chartrs are never, ever revoked.

      Now, if our political processes ever allowed for good ideas like this to be implemented, I'd go out an vote or something. Oh well.

    3. Re:Winding Up Order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, if our political processes ever allowed for good ideas like this to be implemented, I'd go out an vote or something. Oh well.

      Umm... you don't vote? Disillusionment is a political strategy... we really need your vote. Hell, vote Communist... even though they have no chance of winning here, it would send a stronger message than not voting.

    4. Re:Winding Up Order? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Voting sends the message that I believe my vote counts. It's an endorsement of a corrupt, failed system. I choose not to endorse this system.

      It's not that we have the wrong politicians in office, it's that we have any of them there at all.

    5. Re:Winding Up Order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So vote for the write-in candidate "None of the above."

  11. Hire a judgment executor... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how much of a cut they'll take. Probably small since assets for the business will be easy to locate and attach.
    Another poster had some great ideas for obtaining a writ of execution and forcing a Sheriff's sale - I would do that if you don't want to hire a professional judgment executor.

  12. Collecting a Judgment by ninewands · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once the judgment becomes final and non-appealable, you get the clerk of the court to issue you a Writ of Execution on the judgment, then take that to the Constable for the precinct in which the company's offices are located. The Writ will cost you about $15 and the Constable's service fee will probably be somewhere around $50.00. The Constable will serve the writ and either bring back cash or seized property, which will then be sold at auction and you get your money from the Constable.

    That's all there is to it.

    BTW. IAAL

  13. Ask Somewhere Other Than Slashdot by afabbro · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't mean to be rude, but perhaps the local library has better resources than Slashdot. I'd wager that an afternoon spent perusing books on small claims and how to collect would give you all the information you need.

    Second, you're not the first person to face this. In fact, it's a chronic problem with small claims judgements. Did you ask the court? Did you ask the sheriff? Did you ask the county clerk? Why would you ask Slashdot before asking real (omigosh! meatspace!) people who are on the scene with you?

    Finally, I'd google a bit...30 seconds' work took me to several links on how to collect.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Ask Somewhere Other Than Slashdot by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that an afternoon spent perusing books on small claims and how to collect would give you all the information you need.

      Yes, but then none of us would know the scoop. Plus, fellow geeks who have been through it may provide advice that wouldn't turn up in an afternoon at the library.

      That's not to say people shouldn't do their own research, of course. But when I'm reading in the "Ask Slashdot" section, I think questions like this are great.

  14. Glad you picked /. where all Nebraska lawyers hang by mbstone · · Score: 1

    1. Sell the judgment to a collection agency or to someone who went to Dave Del Dotto's get-rich seminar.

    2. Find out how to fill out the forms and collect it yourself, say by a) going to the courthouse law library and look it up, or b) reading Collect Your Judgment by Nolo Press (which is based on California law but the principles are probably basically the same).

    3. (2) presupposes the judgment debtor has a paycheck, bank account, job or real or personal property you can get at. Sometimes if all else fails you can file the judgment as a lien with the county and get paid, with interest, years later when they die or sell their house.

  15. Re:Glad you picked /. where all Nebraska lawyers h by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Also, read your contract and maybe it provides for attorney fees! If so, see an attorney!

  16. Telco Story by rlp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall reading some years ago, that a guy in San Francisco was owed money by the local telco (at the time Pac Bell). He won in small claims court, but Pac Bell still ignored him. To make a long story short, the sheriff filed the paper work to sell one of Pac Bell's downtown buildings in order to collect the money. No one else showed, so the the guy ending up buying it for $1. At that point, he got Pac Bell's attention. He ended up selling them back their building for the amount owed plus court costs.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Telco Story by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      He ended up selling them back their building for the amount owed plus court costs.

      Let me get this straight: this guy legally acquired real estate for $1 when he was owed a debt of less than $2000 (avg small claims limit) and yet gave up ownership of that building for the sum owed? Did SF real estate just take a huge nosedive or what? Or is he just insane?
    2. Re:Telco Story by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Well, in theory he was entitled to sell the building to whoever he wanted for whatever he could get. But all the while, the phone company's lawyers would have been tying him in knots. He would have been in court for years, with no absolute guarantee that he'd actually come out ahead. Better for everybody to just settle.

    3. Re:Telco Story by robindmorris · · Score: 1

      Sounds dubious. If he'd legally bought the building, I'm sure he could have found a good lawyer willing to take care of all the legal hassles for, say, half the value of the building.

  17. Hire a biker! by gfilion · · Score: 0

    Hire a big fat ugly biker to go at that compagny and tell them to pay up right now. Works all the times!

    Then you give $400 to the biker and everyone is happy.

    Have a nice day,
    GFK's

  18. From an attorney.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Take the judgment to the sherriff and get a lien against their property.

    2) Then they can't sell any property without paying you.

  19. Nolo Press has a bunch of stuff on this... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    Besides their great book on collecting small claims judgements, the Nolo website has a whole bunch of information on this.

  20. Nolo Press by fm6 · · Score: 1

    You mentioned the Nolo Press web site, but you dismissed their advice as "broad". Did you find their collecting a court judgment web page? Seems pretty specific to me.

  21. My thoughts by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    I agree with the first poster that said you should now go back to court. My father had to do this once with a guy he paid in advance to cut firewood as well as providing him with a chainsaw. IIRC he first took him to small claims and got the judgement against him. IIRC the judge outlined a payment deadline. When the guy failed to meet the deadline they went back to court and had a lien put on his truck and garnisheed his wages at his day job. I'm pretty sure that's how it worked. I was a little kid when all that happened.

    When you go back to court, make sure you ask for legal expenses. I think they can still do that at this point. It wouldn't hurt to consult with a lawyer. Knowing what you can and can't do would be helpful.

  22. Judgements by ExportGuru · · Score: 0

    Had one of these here in Florida. We used a law firm to write what they call a "Firm letter" (from law firm, we were told) which could have been named a "Rottweiler letter" from its tone. By prior agreement we were charged one hour's service for this, or $150. It worked and I am told that it does 50% of the time. So, you would risk $150 against a probable return of $700, all things considered. Most of the other advice you've gotten seems like it would work, but this is a cheaper first step and does show the judge later on, if you have to go to court, that you have been businesslike in your actions to get your money. Good luck!

  23. You need state-specific advice by Animats · · Score: 1
    This is very state-specific. In California, collection is easy. No idea about Nebraska.

    Since you have a judgement, your next task is to find some asset and get the appropriate authorities to take it for you. Generally, you go after motor vehicles, real property, and bank accounts. If you can find a bank account with money in it, that's usually the easiest.

    Collection agencies will do all this for you, for a percentage of the judgement. Shop around; rates vary. Against an operating business, you should be getting a high percentage of the judgement from a collection agency.

    If you want to find a business's bank account, have someone buy something from them and look at the cancelled check when it comes back.

  24. This is a flaw in US legal system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens much more often than you'd think. This is a flaw in the US legal system. If someone steals $1k-$5k from you, it costs you more than $1k-$5k in effort to collect. You can (maybe) collect the amount that was stolen from you, but you usually can't collect for the time/effort wasted. The practical thing may be to let it go.

    Many businesses are aware of this, and screw individual customer or contractrators, knowing that it isn't practical for someone to collect.

  25. "Winding Up Orders" are a bankruptcy issue by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1

    "Winding Up Orders" are a bankruptcy issue.

    Following a petition for Winding Up Order, either the company pays the debt or the court issues the winding up order. If successful, the court takes over the company's fiduciary responsibility. The court appoints a 'Liquidator' or 'Administrator', who is usually a specialist accountant from the private sector who attempts to rebuild or sell-off the company assets and pay it's debts.

    UK Insolvency Law and FAQs.

    This is all based on ancient tort law which the US shares with the UK, a quick search turns up this. Which highlights a substantially similar process for the US.

    1. Re:"Winding Up Orders" are a bankruptcy issue by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure we mean the same thing. In the US, what little I do understand of it as a layman, a bankruptcy will only ever happen if you have more debt than liquid assets, or are so close that it's difficult to determine if this is the case.

      What you describe, sounds to me like if I was owed $1000 by a million dollar company, that company could still be forced to shut down (presumably with the other $999,000 being split to the shareholders).

      This simply doesn't happen over here. Nothing can force that company to shut down, short of complete insolvency. Seem to remember hearing of the very rare company that voluntarily dissolves, but other than that those 2 (latter much less likely than the former) outcomes, a corporation is immortal.

      We may share some heritage, ancient laws and whatnot, but it seems to me that we've taken very different directions.

  26. get the professionals in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay someone to have them killed. Works for me.

  27. Step 1 - do some research.. :) by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

    Step 1 - Do some research online. I did some Google searching and found quite a bit of information published by the state of CA on how to do collections.

    Here is a brief summary of how it works in CA.

    You can either: get a collection agency or do it yourself.

    Collection agency will take a % of the $s.

    If you want to do it, you have a number of options. Pretty much all of them start with getting what I believe is called a Writ of Execution. It is a two page form that needs to be signed by the courts.

    Once you have that, you can:

    Collect against their bank account (you may need to fill out another form, then the Sheriff will go to the bank and get the money. You don't get it immediately -- they have a time period where if they can show that the $s are protected (i.e. social security type stuff) then they get it back.

    If they run a retail store front that has cash on premises, you can get the sheriff to go and empty out their cash registers.

    If you know how there clients are, you can get an order so that the clients will give you the money directly (talk about an embarrasment to them!).

    You can also order them to have to sell assets to raise you the money.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  28. OT: NCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Or turn it over to a collection agency, pay probably 20%, I would suggest a smaller, local agency that >actually deals with legals, not one of the big call centre in india type places like NCO for example. Speaking of whom.... does anyone know how to STOP them from calling? The previous owner of my phone # had numerous unpaid debts. We got all the collection agencies to stop calling within the first 2 weeks... except NCO. They simply won't stop calling. I've tried a tele-zapper type setup (play the disconnected line tones for their auto-dialer). I spoke with multiple agents, one of whom stated that he thought I was the debtor trying to hide behind a false name, etc.

  29. I have seen this work by motha_chucker · · Score: 1
    in Orange County, CA. where my father works for the County of Orange. When a judgement is decided against a business, if the business does not pay up, the party owed can elect to hire a county official such as my father to go in to the place of business and collect the funds. This only works in a place of business that receives cash funds. My father watches the cash come in all day long and at the end of the day, he takes the amount of the judgement. The persons who do this such as my father work in 12 hour shifts and stay on premises 24 hours a day to prevent the owner from taking funds out of a safe if any during after hours.

    I have seen businesses get around this though. In the case of a restaurant my father was working at, the person who one the judgement was the owner's ex-wife and rather then see her get any money, the restaurant owner gave away free food all day. Then there are other cases such as the time my father worked at Dennis Rodman's restaurant and he walked in and paid the judgement to my father in cash.

    I would check to see if the county or state in which you live offers a similar service.

  30. Re:Options, etc by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Problems:
    1. In most jurisdictions, legal costs do not include your side's lawyers fees. Just things like filing fees, disbursements, etc. This keeps one side from, say, charging $10,000.00 in lawyers fees for a $50.00 debt. Also, you contract probably didn't mention anything about extra fees/charges if/when things went sour.
    2. Refusing to pay a civil judgment is not contempt of court. This is a civil case, and you don't get criminal judgements from civil suits. This is because you have the option of enforcing the judgment (go see a bailiff and put a siezure before judgment on their stuff).
    You have a few choices here:
    1. Write off the full amount
    2. Ask a bailiff/sheriff to execute the judgment/size
    3. Negotiate a settlement
    4. Assign/sell the debt to a collection agency
    Since they're giving you the brush-off, it's likely they're doing this to others as well. Don't be surprised if they're just stringing everyone along so they can collect a few more paychecks while they burn throught the last of their (or their investors) capital. Even if they were to eventually write you a check, it's most likely rubber - it's going to bounce.

    You've been screwed for $1400.00. Consider it a cheap (I mean VERY cheap) investment in your continuing education. You now know the three rules:

    The 3 rules of contracts:

    1. Get it in writing.
    2. Get it in writing.
    3. Get it in writing.
    Of course, there's the 4th rule - which is, it doesn't matter what the contract says, if they are not honorable, you shouldn't be doing business with them.

    Sorry for the bad news.

  31. Re:Options, etc by misterpies · · Score: 1

    Refusing to pay a civil judgment is not contempt of court. This is a civil case, and you don't get criminal judgements from civil suits. This is because you have the option of enforcing the judgment (go see a bailiff and put a siezure before judgment on their stuff).

    OK I should have been more specific. First of all, what I write refers to British not US law, though the two systems have a great deal in common. Contempt of court is classified as civil offence. But the punishment can include being sent to prison - where you count as a "civil prisoner". But try telling someone that you were sent to prison but never committed a crime... the distinction here is overwhelmingly semantic rather than practical. (The main practical difference is that civil prisoners can wear their own clothes, can continue to vote, don't have to work, and aren't eligible for early release..)

    In the UK at least, the main differences between the two is that civil prisoners can wear their own clothes and vote, but aren't always for both types is the same -- in particular, you can be sent to prison for certain civil contempt, including failure to comply with a judgment. Effectively, that makes contempt a criminal offence Well, I can't speak for US laws but in the UK while strictly speaking there are criminal and civil contempts, the difference is really semantic. You can go to prison for a civil contempt of court, Refusing to comply with a judgment is a pretty serious contempt.
    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  32. Collecting on your small claim by niblitz · · Score: 1

    I've collected on several small claims, and it's not that hard. First, you need to have a sheriff's deptartment officer serve the company with a demand-for-payment. The company can ignore it, but if they do, you can place a mechanics lien against any property they own, making it impossible for them to sell same. Best bet is to get a lien against a company bank account, from which the sheriff's officer can do the extracting. I pursued a junk hauler named Reuben Smoth for years after a bag of nails fell off one of his trucks, flattening my car tire. After a few years of trying to execute a small claims judgment in my favor, the sheriff's officer told me, "Son, you really aren't going to give up until you get that money, are you?" My diligence and sincerity were what pushed the deputy to complete the job. I attached a small bank account of the Rev. Mr. Smith's, and collected not only the judgment amount, but interest amounting to 100% of the original claim-plus-costs. If you want to make this an adventure, show up at the company's next shareholder meeting and have a friend perform service on the CEO when he comes to the podium. This is great fun. I once worked for a private detective and was hired to serve a comedian when he went onstage. Be creative and enjoy! You'll get your money eventually, so long as the company has assets, but it sometimes requires patience and persistence. The sheriff's officer should be able to give you some pointers. Good luck! Rick Ackerman

  33. IAAL (sorry) by Mammothrept · · Score: 1



    I am a lawyer (sorry) and whether you own the copyright in the code probably turns on what is in the contract with the customer as well as the pattern of dealing in previous contracts. As a general rule, the person who wrote the code owns the copyright unless they did it while working as an employee of someone who paid them to write it. In that case, it is a work for hire and the employer owns the code.

    If it is not a work for hire, you may very well have assigned the copyright to the customer in the contract. A copyright assignment has to be evidenced by some writing but there is no single set of magic words. Is there something in the contract that clearly says you assign the rights to the source code to the customer? If so, you they own the copyright even if they didn't pay. You don't go home empty handed because you still own the right to sue them on the breach of contract.

    Even if you still retain the copyright, the customer is probably not infringing it. By writing the program for them, at a minimum you probably granted them a non-exclusive license to use the code. You still have a right to sue them on the contract but not on the copyright. Google on Kozinski and "Effects Associates" to see how this works.

    /Begin obligitory disclaimer to keep people from suing me for malpractice or practicing law in your jurisdiction without a license.

    Finally, you should take everything in this posting and everything you find on the Internet about law with a grain silo of salt. You have no way of knowing whether I am really am a lawyer and even if I am, I'm not admitted in your jurisdiction and even if I were, I'm not your lawyer. Ask a lawyer in your own state.

    /end legalese.

  34. Re:Options, etc by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    As I said, the writer of the article has the option of either enforcing his judgment, or not.

    If he doesn't try to enforce the judgment, that ends it.

    If he does try to enforce the judgment, then he has to go by the civil procedures laid out in the debtors' jurisdiction.

    If, for example, the debtor doesn't have the assets to cover the judgment, he doesn't go to jail for failure to comply. His failure, in that case, is reasonable.

    What happens next depends upon"

    1. How much time/resources the plaintiff wants to expend to try to collect a useless judgment (for example, forcing the debtor into involuntary bankruptcy)
    2. What assest the debtor does in fact have
    3. Whether other creditors have established prior liens on the aforementioned assets
    Unfortunately, as I also pointed out, he's learning a lesson we've all had to learn the hard way - "Even if you have it in writing, ultimately it all hangs on the integrity of the people involved." That he didn't even have it in writing really doesn't enter into it at this point, since he's getting the brush-off.
  35. Re:Do this ... ... Are YOU lawyer ENOUGH?! Are u?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nobody is stupid enough to think that you are a lawyer, and even if they are that stupid that's their own damn problem. You're not going to be held liable for bad legal advice given under a PSEUDONYM on a PUBLIC BULLETIN BOARD when NO MONEY HAS EXCHANGED HANDS.

    Giving legal advise ourselves here, are we now? On a PUBLIC BULLETIN BOARD for chrissake! Just kidding. But just think of what could happen... A chinese state attorney might read your post. It might just happen to be illegal for anybody to give legal advise on the internet in PUBLIC BULLETIN BOARDS. That state attorney may also know of a secret deportation treaty China has with the US to handover internet criminals (thanks to Clinton). Two weeks from now US Marshals come and put you on a plane to China. They mumble something about you being a terrorist and insteads of you talking to a lawyer you are put on a plane to a distant country where you will be made welcome by a couple of orientals in grey suits who scream at you in a concrete room 24 hours a day for a week. Oh and btw... they never turn off the flurouscent light in that room and often "forget" to feed or water you for days (at least you think its days).


    Then all of the sudden the door slams open and they put you in a suit. For the first time you risk looking at the guards a little closer... Could it be? Could it be that you're in communist China? You get away with it. I mean looking at the guard. They're taking you to court so they can't risk beating you bloody just now. Then you're loaded on a bus where they inject you with something. You feel good as a warm feeling spreads all the way from your chest to your crotch. You smile. The guards smile. By now you're pretty sure you're in China with all the funny writing on the red transparents that are spanned across all major street intersections. It doesn't matter. You've never felt better in your entire life.


    You're taking to this impressive big building somewhere in the city. Someone explains to you that this is the People's Court and you're a counterrevolutionary terrorist and that he's your lawyer. You're start sort of dozing as the drug takes full effect on your system during the court session. All you remember is that the judge asked you for the address of your immediate family because he wants to send them a bill for ammunition. You understand that the court wants your family to pay for a bullet but somehow that sounds so ridiculous to you, you think you just didn't understand the high pitched shrill voice that has been shrieking at you for the last ten minutes.


    They put you on another bus with a dozen other men and women who are sitting with their heads bowed. The drug is wearing off and you're starting to get a headache. You don't feel so great anymore, actually you're just about to lose it. You start to get up but the guards on the bus slam a rifle butt right into your face. Meehow hang! Hang me chan! I don't know what the guard said just now, and neither do you but it sounded indeed threatening enough for you to back down and hide your bloodied face in your hands. All of the sudden the bus arrives at a stadium where the guards herd you and your fellow commiserates of the bus and make you all kneel in a row. There are thousands of people on the bleechers and the public address system is shrieking out words of anger and contempt in a foreign language while the crowd roars and starts chanting "Ho chan meow han! Chan me han! Chan me han!". Again I don't know what they're shouting and neither do you but it doesn't bode well... Finally you hear the sharp crack of a rifle and see someone on your left crumble to the ground scattering brains and blood. You begin to cry and you don't stop crying and pleading with the guards until the very end.


    IANAL BUT THIS COULD HAPPEN! YOU COULD FACE AN UGLY DEATH IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY JUST BY GIVING LEGAL ADVICE ON THE INTERNET


    Are YOU lawyer enough to say this couldn't happen? Are YOU, huh? ARE YOU?!?!

  36. Collecting the Award, not finding another cause by ipandithurts · · Score: 1

    Ok, from what I get, you want to collect on the award, not find another cause of action (ie. Copyright infringement).

    You will likely need to place a lien on the company (e.g. a mechanic's lein). That way you can have legal claim to get the property you need via the sherrif (and the subsequent sherrif's sale of the property). Unfortunately, I'm not licensed in Nebraska so I can't really help you there.

    Another option is to assign the judgement to a collection agency. You'll have to take pennies on the dollar (e.g. $0.70 on the $1.00) but you'll get your cash now and won't have to worry about the long process of collecting (and would be cheaper than hiring an attorney).

    --

    Stop undressing me with your eyes. I'm ugly naked.
  37. Recording by rrrrrick · · Score: 1

    I think you have to take you court papers to the County Recorder in your area, and have them help you fill out a form to record the jugement into the country register. Some counties have special officers that help you get paid for small claims court judgements, and they are among the 'recorders' who work in the big city-county hall- not the court system. Then they legally owe you the money, since the jugement is recorded. Im not no lawyer, but I've been thru similar sityashuns.

    --
    aiai aaia aiai aaia aiai aaia aii i iai iai iai iai iai ii aiai aia