Slashdot Mirror


Indiana Jones To Arrive Again in 2005

Dolemite_the_Wiz writes "The Raider.net reports that the release date for the next Indiana Jones Movie (tentatively titled 'Indiana Jones 4') is, according to Steven Spielberg, "...going to come out probably for the July 4th weekend of 2005...". The movie looks like it will be set in the 1950s and include just about every main character from the first three films. For more links about this movie, check this search result from Cinescape. Secondly, IndianaJones.com reports that the First three films in the Indiana Jones Trilogy will be released on November 4th. These films have to be one of the most requested DVD releases (probably next to the Original 'Star Wars' trilogy and the first two 'Godfather' movies) ever. " "

This Four DVD set will include:

- Restored Film Footage
- Remastered in THX
- New Dolby 5.1 soundtrack
- A 4th DVD with just about every aspect of how the films were made.

This collection will retail for $49.95 (US)

Here's the official release notice for the DVD.I just hope that the new film and DVD will be able to Satisfy all the Indy fans.
"

53 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Woohoo! About time! by nemui-chan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm really happy they're finally coming out with the fourth movie. The rumors I've heard are that Harrison Ford will be the 'old Indiana' and he will be looking back on the adventures of his youth? Not sure how well thats going to work, but I'm sure that I'll be spending my money at the movies when it comes out.

  2. In this episode . . . by LazloToth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harrison Ford escapes from the old folks' home in his wheelchair and finds the Fountain of Middle Age in a Roman temple, where a 19-year-old nymphomaniac falls hopeless in love with him for 17 minutes and then he flies away in his airplane.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    1. Re:In this episode . . . by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indy used his whip to hang on to the periscope, and the U-Boat never went below periscope depth. Since the snorkels weren't added until years later, the U-Boat couldn't go far or fast while submerged, since it was running on crappy batteries instead of the primary diesel engine.

      Or, God parted the waves or something for him.

      The U-Boat eventually surfaced (which was typical -- they didn't stay under unless they were shooting or hiding), and while Indy would have had to avoid the deck spotters that would stand up there looking for other ships, he'd be somewhat more comfortable.

      When they arrive at the base, he'd have to swim ahead of it to beat it there (remember, he's already hiding out there as the sub is arriving) but aside from having to avoid being seen, it wouldn't be amazingly difficult; the sub's entry into the base won't be at top speed or anything.

      Anyway, the question of how Indy survived that isn't really the big plot hole. I want to know how they managed to get that giant, heavy crate with the Ark in it into the U-Boat. The hatches are not really all that big -- and Spielberg had actually used that as a joke in "1941" when some Japanese sailors have difficulty fitting a large radio set through the hatch.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  3. Really? by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny
    and include just about every main character from the first three films.
    Even the melted ones?
    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  4. Yeah.,.. by Anztac · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Harrison Ford can still kick the s**t out of most people half his age," Spielberg told us. "I think he's in great condition to put the fedora and the hat and the leather jacket back on and crack that bullwhip a few more times."
    Yeah, but if he says "I'm getting to old for this shit" I may have to shoot him...
    --
    ~Anztac
    1. Re:Yeah.,.. by Jonsey · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...Spielberg told us. "I think he's in great condition to put the fedora and the hat and the leather jacket back on and crack that bullwhip a few more times."

      Put on the hat first or second? Because we want to see the Fedora, not some other hat. : )

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  5. Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And then we will have Star Wars 7, Matrix 4, LOTR 4, Harry Potter 5....

    I would rather have a single new original movie, instead of tons of the same old stuff.

    1. Re:Not again by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dont know about Star Wars 7, but We won't have LOTR 4 (the books run out), we will have matrix 4 (they planned from the start to have a 5 movie series), and the contract for Harry Potter runs for 7 movies. What's dangerous is when a movie is created that isn't supposted to have a sequel, and one is later tacked on the end: IE, Rocky movies 2-17, CaddyShack II, and 90% of what disney has been creating rescently (Jungle Book 2, Cinderella 2, etc.)

    2. Re:Not again by Carbonite · · Score: 4, Interesting

      we will have matrix 4 (they planned from the start to have a 5 movie series)

      Really? From what I understood, it was part of a pre-planned trilogy. Would you happen to have a sourec for this? I suppose that we could see another two sequels in a few years if Revolutions grosses as much as Reloaded.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    3. Re:Not again by onthefenceman · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the current trend of declining plot made up for with increasingly dazzling special effects, by the time these movies come out they'll just take your $8.50, give you a box of sparklers, and chase you around the theater a couple of times.

      --
      Have you seen my stapler?
  6. Mark Hamil? by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember reading that Mark Hamil was talked about for playing Indiana's long lost evil brother. Any truth to it?

    1. Re:Mark Hamil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, Mark will be too busy filming the long-awaited sequel "Corvette Summer 2".

  7. Indiana Jones 4: Product Placement Info by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indiana Jones will be using such popular consumer products as Geritol, Fix-a-Dent, Ben Gay, and Preperation H. The people representing those "Rascal" mobility scooters didn't put up enough cash to get into the movie.... Just as well, as the pace would be pretty slow with Harrison Ford buzzing along at a brisk 2 mph on one of those electric scooters.

    --
    Who did what now?
  8. Luck in three's? by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happened to the trilogies that have become so popular?

    Back to the Future, Indiana Jones, Star Wars (I refuse to count the three "newest" ones), etc.

    While I am midly excited to see that this film is going to be released I don't see it as being popular. They are going to concentrate on large-scale special effects and less on the content (just like all recent films and sequels/pre).

    That's my worthless .02

  9. Reworked Scene in RotA by LordYUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    **Spoiler from the Downloaded Kazaa Version**

    Remember that scene in the bazaar with the sword wielding Arabian dude, you know, the one who wants to slice Indy open like a frozen tauntaun?

    Well, in the original Indy just blasts him with his pistol, however, in keeping with the whole "harrison ford shoots second" motiff, Spielburg has decided to let the sword guy swing at him.

    This has the undesirerable side effect of Indy losing his left hand, which has been digitially removed and replaced with a walkie talkie. Years later in the fourth movie, Indy is replaced with a slightly (okay, an extremely) sexier version of himself as a woman, and must engage her in fights that involve her wrapping her legs around him that would leave most contortionists in wheelchairs, slightly before judgement day occurs...

    oh, wait, wrong overdue sequel with a star way too old for the part...

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  10. imdb forum by millette · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The internet movie database already has a few hints in its forum

    1. Re:imdb forum by TheKey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The imdb forum, no offense, has got to be the filth of the Internet. It really boggles my brain every time I go there.

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    2. Re:imdb forum by JDevers · · Score: 4, Funny

      As someone who utterly loves IMDB, I completely agree with your assessment of the forums. Sometimes when checking out the info on a movie or actor/actress I accidently see the titles of the last few postings to that particular discussion and immediately loose a few IQ points. It generally takes a few days to return to normal (in the case of T3, I wandered around aimlessly in the woods for a month...so you might want to be even more careful)

  11. Aw no guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The movie looks like it will be set in the 1950s"

    So no Nazis then?

    Based on the existing trilogy, I just think you gotta have Nazis for it to work well, simply because of their obsession (in real life) with ancient artefacts and folklore... why not a 1940's mid-war Jones?

  12. Preorder for cheap + Useful Link by calebb · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can preorder the Indiana Jones Trilogy for $44.95 at Bestbuy.com. I didn't link directly to their product page to avoid looking like I'm trying to make some $$$ on referrals. However, you can click through your favorite 'hot deals' website if you preorder & still get it for $44.95 while earning them a few cents in the process; Or just go to their website and search for "Indiana DVD" and it will be the top two links FYI: The Widescreen edition SKU is 5721463 & the Full Screen SKU is 5721454.

    And don't forget to check out Spielberg Films for fairly up-to-date news.

    From their Temple of Doom page: It looks like the news previously reported regarding extra features on the fourth disc of the INDY set was on the money as the bonus disc will include documentaries on "The Making of the Trilogy", "The Sound and Music of Indiana Jones", "The Special Effects of Indiana Jones" and "The Stunts of Indiana Jones".
    DVDFile says the "Making Of" doc will be a "new full-length documentary", so its safe to assume that the documentary will be a substantial, feature-length look at the making of the trilogy.
    No word is made about deleted scenes, but amazon.com's spec list did state they would be present. Judging by the accuracy of the other extras they named, things are pointing to their inclusion, but you never know until the discs is in our grubby hands.

  13. Re:Milking the franchise.. by Bigby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you look at Clint Eastwood, he can still play great action characters. Great actors don't need to do difficult physical actions, even in an action movie.

  14. Re:Woohoo! About time! by Ratphace · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Well, actually the plot is a closely guarded secret at this point, and I am glad.

    Sean Connery will be in it as Indiana's Father again and the movie is being set in the 1950's to account for Harrison's aged real life look which cannot be entirely hidden on camera.

    I believe they are having the women of his life make cameo's and such, though Karen Allen is the only one that I'd personally like to see in it as Spielberg's wife (Kate Capshaw) just annoys the hell out of me! :)

    Anyway, my prediction is this: (and this is entirely me guessing, but I am putting it down here now as proof that I said it before the plot was learned)

    Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis (yes, like the original PC game that came out years ago)

    Why do I predict this? Because Atlantis as a real location still fascinates people around the world today, in fact I was watching Discovery Channel the other night about people that are currently looking for it and clues they have found and such. I mean, let's face it, he's found the most prized Biblical Artifacts already, it's time for him to find something bigger. :)


    I guess in the end only time will tell but I thought that I would give you that tidbit at the top about who will be who and why the movie is being set in the 1950's.


    P.S.
    For all your Indiana Jones Fans out there, in case you missed it (as I am sure most have) in the The Temple of Doom, when Harrison jumps out of the hotel at the beginning with Kate Capshaw and they fall into the car and drive past the entrance to the club that they just ran from, well, the big hidden George Lucas "Easter Egg" is the club is named "Club Obi Wan" (from Star Wars yet had an oriental ring to it) :)
    Cheers!

  15. Youth? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
    Well, if the problem is that Harrison Ford is getting to old, then we need to find someone younger. Who better than a young star of movies with "and the" in the title?

    Yes, folks, get ready for Harry Potter and the Temple of Doom!

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Youth? by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Excerpt from the script: (SPOILERS):

      Arabian dude with sword: Twirls sword around, brandishing it menacingly.
      Jar Jar: Meesa goin' to da Temple of Doom to find da Lost Ark! Yeah, that's meesa gonna do!
      Indiana Jones: Looks at Arabian dude with sword.
      Indiana Jones: Looks at Jar Jar.
      Indiana Jones: Shoots Jar Jar and takes his chances with Arabian dude.

    2. Re:Youth? by Ratphace · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Personally, I would rather see the series retired before they bring in someone else.

      Indiana Jones is not a "James Bond" type that you just pass the reigns on to. Harrison Ford will always be Indiana Jones, plain and simple.

      I mean, they have kept the "timeline" of when the movie takes place moving, so it makes passing the reigns harder, whereas James Bond is a 'contemporary character' that is always just played in 'modern times' (i.e. when the file is shot to be in line with how we live our lives at that time).

      But seeing the series retired after Harrison Ford retires from acting would be the right thing to do...

    3. Re:Youth? by parliboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, if this means we're going to sacrifice Hermione by ripping out her heart and showing it to her while it's still beating, I'm up for it!

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    4. Re:Youth? by andyt · · Score: 4, Funny

      But in the Special Edition version, Jar Jar shoots first!

    5. Re:Youth? by jgalun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indiana Jones is not a "James Bond" type that you just pass the reigns on to. Harrison Ford will always be Indiana Jones, plain and simple.

      I hear what you are saying, but I would argue that James Bond is not a type that you can just pass the reigns on to either. None of the successors have come even close to having the charisma that Sean Connery did in the role. And without the incredible charisma (which is the same thing Harrison Ford provides to Indiana Jones), it's just a bunch of bad plots and gadgets...

      Just my two cents.

    6. Re:Youth? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Harrison Ford will always be Indiana Jones, plain and simple. "

      haha, I've heard that about every Bond Actor.

      If they placed a different actor, and made a good movie, you may not like it but the next generation wold.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Youth? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...except for "On Her Majesty's Secret Service", which is actually rather good. Sure, Connery LOOKS good, but the Bond films he stars in are absolute DRIVEL.

      Lazenby may be slightly cheesy, but at least the man can FIGHT!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  16. Re:Milking the franchise.. by mpk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, be fair - Ford's 60, not 90, and in physical good nick. There's plenty of life in the old dog yet, although it does seem slightly bizarre to be doing film 4 now rather than several years ago. Perhaps it would be wise to cut back a bit on the acrobatics and write a plot that's suited to an older, wiser Indy (and if it's set in the 1950s, Indy will have aged about as much as Ford has since the Last Crusade), but writing people off just because they're nearly old enough to collect their pension's a bit unfair.

    And hey, Ford now is about two years older than Roger Moore was when he last played James Bond in 1987.

  17. In the words of Short Round by Zabu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uh Oh -- Big Mistake!


    cited

    --
    It's all good.
  18. New Title Suggestions by bc8o8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about
    "Indiana Jones: Raiders of the Retirement Home"
    or
    "Indiana Jones: The Temple of Viagra"
    or
    "Indiana Jones: The Last Erection"

  19. The Inside Scoop by wynterwynd · · Score: 5, Funny

    The villan from this one will be Interpol, tracking Indiana down for 20 years worth of smuggling national treasures to sell to museums. High adventure ensues in U.S. Extradition Court, as Indy faces his greatest nemesis, Warren "Eyepatch" Fineburg, a ruthless UN junior legal secretary with a jaunty BLACK fedora and a bullwhip-like fountain pen. Indy's only hopes for exoneration lies in a ragtag legal team consisting of a whiny showgirl, an ex-Russian general turned Hindu monk, and a sassy orangutan lawyer. Indy will need all his skill and luck to survive the climactic out-of-court settlement on the ledge of the courthouse clock tower!


    I trusted my heart to you once Lucas, and you let me down. I'll approach this with appropriate levels of guarded enthusiasm.

    Wynter

    --
    "Not all who wander are lost" -- JRR Tolkien
  20. Terminology Catastrophe Warning by aziraphale · · Score: 4, Funny

    "the First three films in the Indiana Jones Trilogy will be released"

    Since, in any rational universe, a trilogy doesn't have a 'first three films', shouldn't that be the 'increasingly inaccurately named Indiana Jones Trilogy'?

  21. Re:The sad thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, Sean Patrick Flanery played Indy in the tv series. River Phoenix played Young Indy in The Last Crusade (the part showing the origin of the scar on his chin).

  22. What about the cup of life and being immortal? by CaptRespect · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since Indy drank from the Cup of Life in the last movie, isn't he immortal now? What kind of plot is that going to make? Is he going to meet up with the Highlander or something?

    Seriously, if he can't be killed and is he just going to walk up to the main Nazi bad guy and shoot him?

    Or maybe I got the last movie all wrong.

    1. Re:What about the cup of life and being immortal? by darrad · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have to remember the plot of the last movie. The price for being immortal was you had to stay inside the seals at the door of the chamber. Since he left the Chamber of the Grail, the immortality is no longer in effect.

  23. Incomplete DVD Set by HisMother · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems to be a trend, as I'm sure y'all have noticed already: announce the latest in a series of movies, and simultaneously release a boxed set of DVDs of all the previous movies. The buzz about the upcoming movie sells the boxed set. After the next movie arrives, the boxed set is now incomplete, and you get a chance to sell a brand new boxed set to the believers. Pretty crappy if you ask me, but people apparently fall for it.

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
  24. Re:Think about it.... by EllF · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Indiana was only immortal in the actual hall of the grail. That is why the knight who guarded the grail was able to stay alive for so long, but never leave the hall -- the grail's gift of immortality did not extend past the seal on the floor.

    --
    We who were living are now dying
    With a little patience
  25. Short Round == Jar-Jar by sczimme · · Score: 3, Funny

    Short Round is the Jar-Jar Binks of the Indiana Jones movies:

    broken English coupled with nails-on-a-chalkboard voice

    cloying attempts to appear cute

    useless in most life-threatening or otherwise important situations

    The major difference is that it is difficult to wish harm on Short Round because he is a little kid - not so with Jar-Jar. I had no trouble wishing Han Solo would show up and shoot first.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  26. No! NO! by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When was the last time Harrison Ford made a decent movie? I'm sorry, but the last few films he seemed to be just .... ordinary. While I love the Indiana Jones movies, I don't really want a new one that isn't in the same league as the first three.

    -MDL

    --
    Happy meals fund terrorism
  27. Maybe you forgot... HHGH !!! by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hitch hicker guide to the galaxy /// A TRILOGY IN 5 PARTS ///

    I hate those young techno punk that think they invented a new, but interesting problem...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  28. Short Round != Jar-Jar by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Are you crazy? Short Round kicked ass! He was a competent getaway driver, a sneaky card cheat, was not intimidated by a beautiful grown woman, knew martial arts, had the guts to apply FIRE to someone else's gut when the situation called for it, knew when to use his tongue and when to hold it, and he saved Indiana by beating the tar out of the little royal kid messing with the bad juju voodoo.

    On the rope bridge, Jar-Jar would have screamed and blubbered. Short Round quietly turned to Willie and said, "Hang on. We going for a ride." The kid had a set of balls on him, man.

    If they had both been there, Short Round would kicked Jar-Jar off the bridge himself in the name of the mission.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  29. Re:Not all of them... by Scryber · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Denholm Elliott was a fine actor, but I felt the character he played in the third movie was nothing like the one from the first.

    In Raiders, he was cautiously uncertain about Indy's pursuit of the Ark. The scene where Jones is packing his suitcase and Brody reveals his misgivings was really well done, conveying a sense that they were messing this things that should be better left alone.

    In the third film, he was, simply, a boob. A comic relief. Dundering and flailing about, he was C-3P0 as a human. Of course that film was lighter in tone all around and IMO none of the movies of the trilogy approach the greatness of the first one, but still I thought that character's transformation from serious to comic was a shame.

  30. 10 years to the day, almost by Markvs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in Vienna, Austria back in July of 1994, the big news on MTV Text was the new Indiana Jones movie, supposedly to focus around the "Spear of Destiny", the spear which stabbed Christ during the Crucifixion was in the works. Hmm.

    BTW, MTV Text was a second MTV channel (this is back when Euro MTV was in English 24-7) which was text only news.

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  31. Artefacts by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You say:

    ...he's found the most prized Biblical Artifacts already...

    He's found the most famous Biblical Artefacts already (plus a Hindu artefact, for that matter), but not the most prized. The most prized must surely include the cross of the crucifixion itself, which, legend has it (if one wishes to give a Hollywood angle to it), heals all who touch it.

    Note that I agree with you: the Christian Artefact angle has pretty much been done enough, and they'll probably try for something else like Atlantis, or something Egyptian, or maybe Incan? Round off the series (I presume this will be the last) with a throw-back to the opening scene of Raiders -- that would be cool. Even so, the Christian Artefact scene is hardly mined out if they think it will please the crowds.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  32. No script yet! by hdc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Harrison Ford was on Conan last week and said he hasn't even seen a script yet for #4. The release time frame is definitely tentative.

  33. Re:Woohoo! About time! by andy1307 · · Score: 5, Funny
    mean, let's face it, he's found the most prized Biblical Artifacts already, it's time for him to find something bigger. :)

    something bigger..like SCO's code in linux?

  34. Re:japanese ring because it is... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, I'm curious as to why a Chinese gangster in Shanghai would want a name that sounded even vaguely Japanese. Virtually everyone in China in the 1930's hated the Japanese, due to, you know, their ruthless and brutal invasion of China.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  35. Re:Karen Allen and Kate Capshaw ? by Ozan · · Score: 3, Funny

    As long as they don't bring back that little annoying kid in the Yankee cap in Temple Of Doom.

    I want short-round in the next movie. Played by Yun-Fat Chow. Wouldn't that be something?

  36. Modern Day Indy? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
    How about:

    Indiana Jones and the Search for the WMD

    It could be set in the desert, and could have the opening scene in the Oval Office with G.W. telling Harrison Ford that there is a POWERFUL MYSTERIOUS ARTIFACT that evil terrorists are hiding that he needs to find. He's not really sure what it looks like...just that it has the potential to bring lots of DOOM! And if he comes across any oil to make sure to relay the coordinates to his personal line.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  37. home video and movie theaters by GunFodder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I want to see a movie with thought provoking themes, interesting dialog, and fully realized characters then I will go rent it and enjoy it from the comfort of my couch.

    If I am going to drive to a theater, shell out $9, watch stupid commercials and listen to bland pop for half an hour waiting for the movie to start then I want to watch a movie that knocks my socks off. I want assloads of special effects and bass that goes down to the brown note. Otherwise I can get a better movie watching experience in my own home.