Slashdot Mirror


ATI's Radeon Linux drivers no longer supported?

SuperBug writes "After viewing the previous story on Slashdot about the Radeon 9800 vs GF FX 5900, I checked out ATI's web-site which seems to have been re-designed relatively recently. It seems strikingly similar to nVidia's site regarding the driver selections. I thought "great, ths should be much better to find my drivers now. At least a little simpler." To my surprise. I found this message for Linux Graphics Drivers "Not Supported". Thinking this had to be a mistake, I took a look at the "Discontinued Products" list under the customer care link and lo and behold. Just about every recent card is there. I just wanna know, what gives?"

27 of 666 comments (clear)

  1. possible answers? by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like they answer a lot of Linux questions in the FAQ.

    Mike

    1. Re:possible answers? by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny, in the FAQ they say they supply binary drivers for accelerated 3D.

      They no longer have them on the web site.

      The FAQ is old, and has not been updated.

    2. Re:possible answers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well the FAQ still states

      Full-featured and optimized XFree86 drivers are available on the ATI website for the following product families ONLY:
      • RADEON 9700
      • RADEON 9000
      • RADEON 8500
      • FireGL Workstation products
      The FireGL drivers are still listed if you go through the drivers page

      Now having said all of this, ATI never supported the Linux drivers anyway. They provide documentation and tell you where to find drivers for Linux, but the drivers themselves are actually external to ATI. ATI generally provide patches to E.g. XFree86 but they do not maintain the drivers themselves. So whats new?
    3. Re:possible answers? by subsolar2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      ATI has only ever "Officially" supported Linux Drivers for their FireGL series of products. These drivers "unoffically" support the 8500 and beyond consumer grade products.


      Nothing new here ... please move along.

    4. Re:possible answers? by Endareth · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing found from digging through the ATI web site, while it is obviously in need of an update (note several references to the Linux drivers being available in the drivers section), there is mention of DRI Radeon drivers available at the Direct Rendering Open Source Project, with Linux Intel x86 drivers dated 2003-06-30.

      --
      Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
    5. Re:possible answers? by Ishin · · Score: 5, Informative
      I also have an ATi TV wonder VE (in addition to a radeon 9700pro, but that's neither here nor there, as I agree on their driver support being crap) and use these open source drivers. They work great under windows 2000 on my dual athlon machine. They also worked fine in windows98se in my past experience.

      hopefully this will solve your problems.

  2. This article is all wrong by phoxix · · Score: 5, Informative
    Get your binary only ATI drivers right here:

    http://www.schneider-digital.de/html/download_ati. html

    ATI's Alexander Stohr still works on these drivers (and is a lurker of the dri-devel mailing list.)

    Lastly, why don't slashdot editors do some sort of background checking. What are they being paid for?

    Sunny Dubey

    1. Re:This article is all wrong by phoxix · · Score: 5, Informative
      Just like to add, those drivers work on the 8500 series to 9800 series. Even if they are labled for higher end cards.

      Sunny Dubey

    2. Re:This article is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      The article is not all wrong. It is all *correct* in describing the experience of a user. Even now, if you follow the same steps reported in the article you will get the same results. If you go to the driver web page and select Software: Graphic Driver, Operating System: Linux, you will be told "Not Supported". Even the Linux FAQ claims the web site has XFree86 drivers available for 3D Graphics Acceleration and 2D Graphics Acceleration. And many "recent" (less than 3 years old) are listed on the "Discontinued Products" list.

      It is true that the FireGL drivers can be used on more recent ATI cards, but ATI should then list them in the Graphic Driver section and not hide them in the FireGL section.

      And the fact remains that ATI is being disingenuous to claim on their Linux FAQ that
      ATI has made the necessary hardware and programming information available to Linux developers for the development of hardware 3D acceleration.
      while at the same time saying

      Slo-Tech: When will ATI provide open source (Linux) developers with information about yours hardware so that they will be able to write drivers instead of reverse engineer them?

      Richard Huddy: ATI gives Linux drivers quite a high priority - but there's just way too much intellectual property exposed in the low level chip interfaces so we don't put that into the public domain. I'm amazed that people can really reverse engineer drivers from our binaries - but I guess that shows just how keen the Linux community is to get the best out of their machines. Sorry I can't offer more on this!

      It is hypocritical and false advertising to boot. I see no reason to cut ATI any slack.
  3. Isn't this suppored by DRI? by termos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check here for more information. I am not sure though.

    --
    Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
    1. Re:Isn't this suppored by DRI? by paranode · · Score: 3, Informative

      DRI support stops with the 8500 since ATI has neglected to provide the newest hardware specs to open source developers.

  4. Discontinued products by CaseyB · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Discontinued products" simply means they aren't manufacturing them any more, i.e. anything that isn't in the current "Products" section.

  5. ATI Linux Drivers by Surak · · Score: 5, Informative

    ATI XFree Drivers have always been written by third parties. ATI does not support them and never has. They merely provide specs to open source developers who in turn write drivers. nVidia, OTOH, actually writes drivers, but keeps the source closed.

    So you have to decide the between the lesser of two evils, I guess.

  6. Richard Huddy from ATI answered that question by Rapsey · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.slo-tech.com/clanki/03032/03032en.shtml

  7. Re:Is that an official distribution? by phoxix · · Score: 5, Informative
    Alexander Stohr is an employee of ATI. And the drivers on the link are official, are an offical source of distribution.

    Sunny Dubey

  8. Re:NVidia vs. ATI by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Speaking as someone who just installed Knoppix and the Nvidia drivers you're full of it.

    Just grab the GLX and Kernel [4363 is latest] tar.gz's. Unpack them, export IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=true. go into the Kernel directory, make, go into the GLX directory, make, go into /etc/X11, edit XF86CONFIG-4 [e.g. remove dri, etc.. replace nv with nvidia], add nvidia to your /etc/modules

    now either reboot or isnmod nvidia and launch startx. Boom NVIDIA drivers.

    It took me a while to figure that out [specially the IGNORE_CC part] but once I did I had no troubles installing the files.

    All in all if you know what you are doing it takes 3 minutes to install the drivers and GLX portions.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  9. Discontinued products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "Discontinued Products" page has nothing to do with Linux drivers. "Discontinued Products" simply means everything except for the current line-up (Radeon 9800, 9600, and 9100); these are no longer being manufactured, but they are still supported.

    The removal of the binary-only Linux drivers (not to be confused with the "radeon" XFree driver) is news to me, though.

  10. Open Source drivers by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Just because ATI doesn't have drivers, doesn't mean its a bad thing. Just look at the GATOS project. I have been using these drivers for years with excellent performance. Even my TV Tuner in my old Rage128 AIW works good and I can capture to MPEG.

    Now I don't know (or have I tried) anything about their Radeon support. I simply don't have a Radeon card. But if it works as well as the Rage and AIW, then these are definitely the drivers for you!.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  11. ATI (EU) on why no driver support for Linux by Sammich · · Score: 3, Informative
    Coming in a late to the thread but . . .
    Slo-Tech: When will ATI provide open source (Linux) developers with information about yours hardware so that they will be able to write drivers instead of reverse engineer them?

    Richard Huddy: ATI gives Linux drivers quite a high priority - but there's just way too much intellectual property exposed in the low level chip interfaces so we don't put that into the public domain. I'm amazed that people can really reverse engineer drivers from our binaries - but I guess that shows just how keen the Linux community is to get the best out of their machines. Sorry I can't offer more on this!

    Article Here Dj
  12. Re:Radeon is supported by XFree86 team by eviltypeguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not anything beyond the Radeon 8500 is supported. ATi won't provide the technical specifications citing industry trade secrets and a bunch of other crap. Oh, they also don't think that Open Source programmers are capable of writing a real driver for programmable hardware like the 9600 / 9700 / 9800.

    They also refuse to provide the information to XiG, so you don't even have the choice of buying a commercial driver.

  13. I don't know if this helps but... by qtp · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Read, L
  14. Re:Radeon is supported by XFree86 team by mahdi13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    What the hell are you smoking? The XFree team reversed engineered it themselves, all ATi did was steal their work and fling poo at them

    From the Interview last week...

    Slo-Tech: When will ATI provide open source (Linux) developers with information about yours hardware so that they will be able to write drivers instead of reverse engineer them?

    Richard Huddy: ATI gives Linux drivers quite a high priority - but there's just way too much intellectual property exposed in the low level chip interfaces so we don't put that into the public domain. I'm amazed that people can really reverse engineer drivers from our binaries - but I guess that shows just how keen the Linux community is to get the best out of their machines. Sorry I can't offer more on this!

    --
    "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Article is a lie, falsification---Slander, even by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Funny.

    I was curious, and tried their website, which is much better than it used to be, now it is like nvidias.

    Lets see-----Graphic Drivers, Linux, 8500.

    Funny, their are drivers there. Sure, they are a little old, but whatever, ATI always has old drivers on their site.

    Then, lets see. Where I usually go---

    Fire GL, Linux, FireGL 8800

    The new drivers---> Both packages above are the fglrx drivers. Both unofficially are supported on the Radeon 8500 through the Radeon 9700.

    Get a life, people. ATI driver support has not changed. They have always unofficially supported linux in this fashion--->if their drivers cost you $10,000 in hardware, thats your problem. I'll bet that NVIDIA's 'official' support, however, has a liability wavier associated with. The only difference is that NVIDIA supports their card, if their driver fries it, while ATI will not.

    But, I've never seen any device's driver fry the hardware from its manufacturer.

    Besides, which of these two manufactures releases the specs on their cards? Which of these two manufactures has active open source drivers in development? ATI has been MUCH better to the linux community than Nvidia.

    Even if their hardware/drivers are slightly buggier.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  17. What a bunch of reactionary crap ... by pantropik · · Score: 5, Informative
    Normally I don't post in threads like this, which mostly consist of every user with a functional keyboard doing his best to shout down everyone else.

    I've read through this thread and read "ATI is great and you're a moron" and "ATI sucks and YOU'RE a moron" ... I must say, it'd almost be amusing if the people saying this crap didn't come across as being so serious.

    Let's review:

    ATI's website has been revamped. Completely replacing a website this large in place is, one would expect, nontrivial. We can expect a few glitches here and there. It's not like some guy at GeoCities unveiling his new "Pamela's Yummy Tits" website. It's certainly NOT worthy of this level of discussion (term used VERY loosely) when the simple fact is, as you're about to see, it's all about ... NOTHING!

    After reading all about the horrors facing innocent Linux-using high-end Radeon owners, I did the unthinkable: before posting ANYthing I visited the site for myself. I know, I know, the ancient Greek method of simply thinking about something and then expounding on it rather than actually sullying ones' self by investigating ... it's ugly. But I never claimed to be perfect. Next thing you know I'll actually start READING THE ARTICLES BEFORE COMMENTING ... god help me.

    First I went here.

    Then I clicked the big link called "DRIVERS". That brought me to here.

    In the left pane I clicked "Graphic Driver". The pane to the right of that then presented an array of choices. I chose "Linux" and then from the pane just to the right of that I chose "RADEON 9700 PRO".

    And what did I find after clicking the little red and quite intuitive "GO" button?


    Driver Download and Installation
    Before you start, please read these installation tips.

    Download this driver bundle if you are having issues with your ATI product, including those mentioned in the "Fixed in this driver"
    ATI Linux Driver Version 2.5.1:
    Install the Driver Package for XFree 4.1.0 OR Install the Driver Package for XFree 4.2.0.
    Xfree86 Version Driver Version
    4.1.0 X4.1.0-2.5.1
    4.2.0 X4.2.0-2.5.1

    Posted: November 29, 2002
    Released/Not Supported

    Driver Release Notes (HTML)

    This version supports only Linux/x86 versions based on libc 6.2.
    To find out which library you have, download the script 'Check.sh' and run it.
    This bundle contains the necessary files for any X86 version of Linux based on libc 6.2 (glibc 2.2)
    Submit feedback on this driver to our ATI Linux Driver Feedback

    Further Linux and XFree86 information on ATI products is available from the ATI website.


    And there you go. Emergency over. After reading all the pure CRAP in this thread I must say it was a bit of a letdown.

    And for those a bit braver, beta drivers for X 4.3 can be found HERE If you want to know what the deal is with these drivers (which are much newer than the ones on the main ATI site) just head over to HERE and you'll find lots of comments made by people who have (*gasp!*) actually USED the drivers instead of just making uninformed and mostly WRONG sweeping statements about them on Slashdot.

    I apologize. I don't normally post things this mean-spirited but watching this thread unfold just kind of disgusted me. So many people ready to spout whatever bullshit pops into their minds, so FEW people who take a look at what's actually going on ... and you know what else?

    Mod me down all you want. In this case I really, really very honestly don't care.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. hmm... by Grifter · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just downloaded the Raedon drivers for linux, for X11 4.2 ... dunno buddy.

    would someone check pefore posting this trash on slashdot's main page?