Slashdot Mirror


China Accelerates Mars Program

securitas writes "You read it correctly - Mars. China has announced it intends to accelerate its Mars program, using experience and expertise from its fledgling lunar program. Following China's proposed Moon missions, the first phase would send a Mars orbiter to examine and survey the Red Planet; the second phase will involve wheeled robotic probes like China's Mars Explorer roving vehicle prototype, used to collect and analyze rock samples; and the third phase will involve returning spacecraft from the planet and establishing a permanent automated base on Mars. This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light and clearly indicates that China plans to play with the big boys of Mars exploration."

71 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. How long? by buro9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before NASA's budget sees a major increase?

    1. Re:How long? by PhillC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An increase in the NASA budget would be a very good thing for the future of Government lead space exploration.

      However, the caveat I would add is that as long as this increased spending did not come from social welfare budgets, health, education etc.

      The best place for an increased NASA budget to come from is military spending. If the amount of effort and money that is spent on creating items of destruction was put into space exploration I'd say we'd be in for some exciting times.

      --
      Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
    2. Re:How long? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, considering an increase of 7% in NASA's budget would bring it up to the same level of spending as during the Apollo era, and that that increase could put a man on mars in 10 years, this couldn't be a bad thing.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:How long? by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, the caveat I would add is that as long as this increased spending did not come from social welfare budgets, health, education etc.

      It is not as simple as that. For example, if diverting money from social programmes to industry boosts employment, then the welfare budget can shrink with no ill-effect because fewer people need it. If diverting money from education to space research means that grants for physics postdocs are approved by a different committee than before, then the net result is likely to be little different. If money is diverted from healthcare to orbital laboratories, which then come up with new drugs, then that's actually better for the nation's health.

      The best place for an increased NASA budget to come from is military spending. If the amount of effort and money that is spent on creating items of destruction was put into space exploration I'd say we'd be in for some exciting times.

      A lot of space activity is funded from military spending. The USAF are prolific satellite enthusiasts, for example. That brings down the cost of launching for everyone and funds development of sensors and signal processing technology that can be used by scientists.

      What I would really like to see is some military spending diverted to fusion research. That would be win-win - a scalable power source, both for use on Earth and to power spacecraft on long missions, and it would also meet the military's goal of increasing national security by reducing reliance on the Middle East. Frankly I am surprised that alternative sources of power aren't receiving more interest at present.

    4. Re:How long? by jandersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      'if diverting money from social programmes to industry boosts employment' goes the usual catchphrase. It doesn't work that way; the rich people get richer, the poor don't, that's all. You'll find out after a few more years of Bush's reward-my-pals-scheme; that is, if you don't die in the meantime because you couldn't get medical benefit.

      As for the military - this is about research, right? And we people of the internet believe in freedom of information - especially when it comes to scientific information. The army should be thrown out, simply - they don't believe in openness and sharing information. Giving them more money will just make them grow bigger, so America will alienate more of the world, so the army needs to grow bigger, which will create more enemies, etc etc ad nauseam.

      America needs two things: humbleness and frugality. Humbleness, which is necessary for building friendship, and frugality with resources that are soon going to be scarce. Fusion is not likely to be within easy reach in the near future. We simply know too little, and perhaps it will turn out that the only profitable way to produce energy that way is to create a star.

    5. Re:How long? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Informative

      As for the military - this is about research, right? And we people of the internet believe in freedom of information - especially when it comes to scientific information. The army should be thrown out, simply - they don't believe in openness and sharing information.

      Umm, you do know that the Internet was actually invented by the military, right? Go look up DARPA on your favourite search engine.

      Fusion is not likely to be within easy reach in the near future.

      The breakeven point was reached recently, the point at which a fusion reaction outputs as much power as is needed to sustain it. The science is done; the rest is all engineering. But at present it is starved of resources.

    6. Re:How long? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait for some old Congressmen to realize that China is only after Mars because it's the Red planet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:How long? by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frankly I am surprised that alternative sources of power aren't receiving more interest at present.

      Really? Oil is big money. Big money gets things done in this country.

    8. Re:How long? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? Oil is big money. Big money gets things done in this country.

      But there is no such thing as Big Oil, really - there is only Big Energy. People don't want oil, it's nasty stuff, they want to be able to move people and goods from A to B, heat homes, power electrical devices and so on. Energy companies should be racing to see who gets to fusion first, because whoever does will make a fortune.

  2. Interesting, but check the source... by TrueWest175 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The People's Daily is a state-run paper that is usually full of articles about how much students and peasants love the government and how Falun Gong is a dangerous cult. Interesting if they are accelerating the program, but the source is pretty sketchy.

    --


    laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank
    1. Re:Interesting, but check the source... by popeyethesailor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well did you read the article? The article quotes academicians, and they are pretty candid in admitting that they are not ready yet.

      Even the headline says "Space Scientists Say China's Mars Probe 'Years Away'".

      It definitely doesnt sound like propaganda.

    2. Re:Interesting, but check the source... by evilWurst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I trust it this time, but the parent poster does have a point. They could be printing only the positive quotes and leaving out the negative. Kind of like how in the US, every movie, no matter how crappy, has some reviewers supporting it and quoted on the box. China's got 4x the population of the US...I'm sure they can always find *someone* who has the opinion they're looking for.

      Cynical, yes, but I'm only holding China to the same standards of cynicism as I do to the rest of the world :)

  3. Seriously, as there is only one human race... by D4MO · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    ..whay can't they all work together?

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    1. Re:Seriously, as there is only one human race... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ..whay can't they all work together?

      There's a bunch of folks in Tibet been wondering the same thing...

    2. Re:Seriously, as there is only one human race... by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't they all work together?

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    3. Re:Seriously, as there is only one human race... by DiggiLooDiggiLey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, but I think some competition is only good. I do agree that we should be able to work together. But most people doesn't think like that, and never will.

  4. This is great by sukottoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is the best thing for the future of space exploration. Competition will lead to innovation, and hopefully to added funding. I think when the American population sees China making great progress towards exploring Mars, there will be more of a demand for American exploration.

  5. I don't wish them harm... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but going by China's record on safety, I expect there's going to be some pretty fireworks.

  6. Finally by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First the moon, and now mars..

    Could China possibly be trying to hype up its space program to scare other countries? I mean, it just seems kind of odd that all of the sudden, all of these stories about China and space are surfacing..

    I'd like to see a mission before I believe any of it.. seems like China is just preparing for a cold war

    But who knows

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  7. If this is accurate... by GearheadX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the best news we've heard for NASA in a couple of decades. There's nothing like a little compeition with one of the 'evil empires' of the world to get our Congressmen in a spending mood.

    We went to the Moon so that the USSR couldn't get there first, ne?

    1. Re:If this is accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it was because the USSR had already beaten the US into space and already sent a probe to the moon. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to troll here or anything, but this was easily the single biggest driving force behind the US sending men to the moon.

    2. Re:If this is accurate... by Krandor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was still the competition with USSR that was the catalyst for our moon program. If we did not have that competition we probably would have never gone. Now with competition with China, that could help jump-start the program again which IMO is a good thing.

  8. The more I read of China by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not so sure this is just about getting to Mars and the Moon. I think China is actually attempting to do what we did to the soviet union and trying to get us to escalate in spending in order to quicken an economic collapse. I don't think we're ready for another "cold war" just yet.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:The more I read of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Benefits of long-range manned missions are minuscule compared to the costs. It's just a big pissing contest, just like space race during the cold war.

    2. Re:The more I read of China by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are they betting on Bush's inability to maintain a budget?

      Now that's a gimme if I ever heard of one...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:The more I read of China by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think China is actually attempting to do what we did to the soviet union and trying to get us to escalate in spending in order to quicken an economic collapse.

      Wasn't there an Arthur C. Clarke short story about just that? It was only a few pages long, but essentially it ends with the Chinese having economically exhausted both the Russians and the Americans, and getting ready to send ships out of the solar system... Or maybe it was a James P. Hogan story?

  9. Space race by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light and clearly indicates that China plans to play with the big boys of Mars exploration.

    It's not a race in any meaningful sense right now - China has only said it intends to do something that the US has already done, after all. It will become considerably more interesting if a non-NASA space agency - the Chinese, the Indians, the Europeans - announces that it fully intends to land and recover a manned Mars mission before NASA can. My money's on the Chinese - they're the ones with the most to prove, Europe is too apathetic and India cannot devote the resources to it that China's command economy can. As to whether they beat NASA... well that really boils down to the man in the White House. The US/Soviet Empire space race was all about trying to convince the nonaligned nations which political system was the best... it wasn't about scientists competing purely for prestige, it was a battle of national Will. If the US decides that it is going to be impressive enough to take the lead in getting to Mars, then the Chinese would face some stiff competition. Maybe if Russia had more money it could partner with ESA, make it a 3-way race, maybe Japan could join that consortium.

    1. Re:Space race by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In that case, the USA's days as the leading nation on earth (financially, technologically etc.) are numbered. As they choose to rest on their laurels, they will stagnate and then wither. It's sad to see the vitality disappear from what was once such a great country. Such short-sightedness will end in tears.

  10. Re:Finally by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, chances are they are just saying this to wind up the US. I'll bet this sort of thing is actually quite a long way down on their list of priorities. Even if they mean it, the cash could easily dry up before it gets that far. The world isn't exactly in a boom economy right now.

  11. Re:Finally by Farrell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the wheel hasn't been used in decades, maybe it could use a little reinventing.

    --
    I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. in the spirit of science by rexguo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope China will work with NASA and ESO in a co-operative level instead of with a competitive nature. It will be a shameful waste of Earth's, humans' and economic resources to duplicate what NASA has done (i.e. those that have true scientific value) rather than a I-can-do-it-too. Also, with China's wages problems (mainly those in the agricultural industry) yet seeing results, why is it spending such insane sums of money in an area that will not bring tangible benefits to its people ans standard of living?

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
  14. this just in by t_aug · · Score: 4, Funny

    China has scrapped its mars program to sooner attain its goal of putting a human on the solar surface. Sources quoted as saying "take that you capatalist pigs."

  15. Where's China..? by Larsing · · Score: 5, Funny

    China is light years away from launching Mars exploration programmes

    I didn't know China was in a different solar system(!).
    Would that be Alpha Centauri or Ursa Minor Beta..?

    --
    Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    1. Re:Where's China..? by zero_offset · · Score: 3, Funny

      But I bet the ship they develop will be able to do the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs!

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  16. Put the RED back in Red Planet [EOM] by aaronlev · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry .. groan. I'm sure some news reporter already got to that one.

  17. Ehh by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China: Hey USA, we're going to send stuff to moon! Neeneer

    USA: Uhh, we've already done that

    China: Hey, USA, we're going to send stuff to mars!! neeneer

    USA: Right-o, Mr. Red

    China seems to be all talk and no substance. Personally, it seems as if they are just trying to tell the rest of the world "Look, we can do it too!" but never actually doing it.

    And I don't like how so many people consider a 'space-race' a good thing... the USSR/USA 'space-race' did speed up technological developement in that department, sure.. but the goal was for the totally wrong reason, and it happened wayyy too fast.

    We're going to the moon! ( 10 years later ) We're on the moon, hurray! ( 5 years later ) Uhh, we're on the moon.. I want to go home

    It seems like soon as we beat the USSR and reached our goal, being that there was nothing worthwhile for the government to invest in (winning a space race = instant world respect and nationality rises considerably, i guess) so it just went stagnant.

    The government should have a program that helps and directs corporations getting into space directly, and showing them how a profit could be made... that's where the real ticket is

    10. PROFIT!

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Ehh by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The government should have a program that helps and directs corporations getting into space directly, and showing them how a profit could be made... that's where the real ticket is

      I think you might like Robert Zubrin's books. He's an engineer by profession who advocates colonization of Mars, and as an engineer he has some pretty realistic ideas about how to do it. But one of his other proposals is mining He3 on the moon. We know it's there. A fusion reactor running on He3 would be far more efficient than one running on D-T, because you could extract the power by inductance directly into electricity rather than by heating steam to turn a generator. He does some calculations of how much the substance is worth at current electricity prices (I don't have my copy here son I can't quote the numbers, but they are large), and once fusion is demonstrated as being usable with D-T, it should be straightforward enough to raise capital for mining He3 on the moon commercially.

  18. My biggest fear: by Jonsey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I only worry they'll go to Europa, against the old mandate, and start drilling. Once the shambling plant-thing comes up and kills them, then the US will be laughing... Yeah.

    Thank you Arthur.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  19. But China can save money of safety. by MongooseCN · · Score: 3, Funny

    Judging from it's history, China doesn't have to spend as much money of safety devices and testing.

    Chinese Official: You! Citizen #32185 have been lucky enough to be chosen to fly to Mars!
    Citizen: Wh.. what?
    CO: Put him in the cannon!
    C: What's Mars?
    CO: FIRE!
    BOOM
    Technician: Looks like this one didn't make it to orbit either.
    CO: More gun powder! You! Citizen #32186 have been lucky...

  20. No Race, Just Media Hype by reallocate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China's "expanding" space program consists primarily of plans and conjecture. Calling this is "space race" is more than a little silly.

    China is using 30-40 year old Soviet technology in their attempt to accomplish things other nations accomplished 30-40 years ago. I'm happy they are trying, but this isn't much of a race.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:No Race, Just Media Hype by tgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong. It doesn't matter how old the stuff is, or what they're trying to do. They win if we don't participate. We can't critisize them using 30 year old technology to do what we did 30 years ago, because we're not even using that technology to do it today, much less anything new.

    2. Re:No Race, Just Media Hype by reallocate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a race because the race is already over. Humans in orbit, probes to the Moon, Mars and Venus, and humans on the Moon all happened in the 60's.

      The Saturn V was built to carry the Apollo to the Moon. It did that quite well. The Shuttle (neither mine nor "super-duper-tech") was designed in the 70's to (A) be reusable, and (b) ferry people and cargo to and from a space station. That's all. It was never designed to do anything else. I'm not a fan of the shuttle, but don't disparage it for failing to do something it was never intended to do.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    3. Re:No Race, Just Media Hype by evilWurst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure it's a race, just not against who you think. If they get to a man in space soon, they'll beat the European Union, India, and Japan. Passing the EU is worth a lot of prestige, given that those nations once ruled most of the world (including chunks of China!). And getting to the moon means they'll have beaten the EU and Russia, tying the current space champions. Lots of prestige there, obviously. Even though it's already been done, it's obviously still a tough problem if no one else has done it in all this time, and even if they can't surpass every nation, they can surpass n-1 nations now and have at least a chance on the mars race.

      Plus it's a good excuse to advance their local expertise in aerospace materials and computer tech, both of which could get them competitive in the global market for planes and chips.

  21. Looks like NASA may finally get a kick in the butt by iJed · · Score: 2

    This may be finally what makes the US government sit up and take notice. Hopefully they will increase NASA funding so that they can finally send a manned mission to Mars. I'm sure the offshoot technology and the inspiration for such a mission would be well worth the cost. Even so skimming a little off the military funding and putting it into something valid such as space exploration is far better than killing people.

  22. Re:Finally by mickwd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps it's because the US is scaring them.

    I ask you, what could the US possibly do to make the Chinese (and the rest of the world) even more interested in accelerating their space programs than attempting to pull crap like this ?

  23. Land, Land and more land by engineerdude · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're trying to find new homes for the 20 million people displaced by the new dam....

  24. Re:Finally by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That was a great article, and I suggest you mod that post up, if anyone with mod points read this.

    If the US did successfully take control of space in such a way, it could be really damaging to the human race in general... if we want to survive, we will (someday) have to get off this rock, and if the human race as a WHOLE doesn't work together on this goal, we are all doomed.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  25. More Power To Them by aerojad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as humans get into space, I could care less under what flag or what government it is for, just as long as we get out there... and then resist having a war over it.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  26. Re:OTOH 1.5 gigapeople is a lot by alannon · · Score: 4, Informative
    Tax at $1 a head on 1.5GP netts you a lot more spendable than $1 a head on 300MP.
    GDP Per Capita in US: purchasing power parity - $36,300 (2001 est.)
    GDP Per Capita in China: purchasing power parity - $4,600 (2002 est.)

    Source is CIA World Factbook
    Do the math.
  27. Re:Zealots by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The truth of the matter is, they are soooooooooo far behind, how can you call it a race?

    Very simple...

    They dont have to engineer squat. 99.997% of all the engineering and testing is done for them and freely available.. or available for a price. I am sure the country formerly known as the USSR would gladly sell information on how to get your ass in space, to the moon, to mars, to uranus.. (Ok ok.. bad joke...) all they have to do is build. they have more computing power today than the United states had in 1989.. hell if they use linux and a correct implimentation they can have more computing power than the USA has right now.

    The speed of advancement is very fast as the Chineese only have to traverse a very small part of the learning curve.

    I think they can do it... but I do doubt that they will... China is known for 2 things.. Lots of population and propaganda... their government is really good at the propaganda part.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. Pardon my French, but by michiel.h · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FUCK the space program.

    China ought to use all that money and invest it in their economy, schools, health system, and anything else _but_ useless look-how-big-my-d1ck-is crap.

    There are hundreds of millions of Chinese living a miserable life and finally their economy is steadily starting to improve. Finally they have a partyleader who actually tries to improve their living conditions, Hu. They should use this money for their country, not try to rival with the US.

    //I lived in China and am currently studying 'Chinese languages and cultures' at Leiden University.

    1. Re:Pardon my French, but by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China ought to use all that money and invest it in their economy, schools, health system, and anything else _but_ useless look-how-big-my-d1ck-is crap

      I'll resist the obvious cheap joke and move straight to the possibility that China could become the low cost payload-lift nation in a decade and get a big chunk of that polynomial-shaped satellite-buisness curve.

      If that kind of wealth/economy/job creation is worthwhile, maybe this R&D effort isn't such a bad bet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Re:Finally by 2Bits · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to see a mission before I believe any of it.. seems like China is just preparing for a cold war

    Conspiracy theory put aside, I think this is a little bit exagerated.

    The Chinese government (most high level officials who can make major governmental decisions, at least) are mostly practical. You can't really find anyone who is ultra-conservative and xenophobic right now, not those who are in the position to make decisions.

    The major concerns right now to push the economic development as fast as we can (I say we, as I'm Chinese and living in Shanghai), unless there's concern about uncontrollable inflation.

    Most officials now just try to play nice, especially with the US (remember the plan crash incident? Bush was amazingly arrogant at the time, but China kinda backed down not to get the sino-us relation into bad water). A lot of people think the government is spineless. But I think the government made a lot of decisions that are right, given the current situations here (economic, political, scientific, ...etc). China still depends a lot on other countries, and the officials understand that.

    And this is a good thing.

    Sure, China tries to develop other areas of expertise too, so what? What does that have to do with Cold War? Why do we have to think that all scientific research must have anything to do with military conspiracy, especially when it is done in China, India, or Russia?

    Do you think only people in the US love peace? We all do too. Just give us a chance and I believe we can contribute a lot to the progress of humanity too, just we have done in the past.

  30. Re:Finally by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep. Not just "negation", but also other countries have seen the advantage that GPS guided weapons gives to the US, and are no doubt paying keen attention to the US's recently announced global reach weapons plans:

    US to Develop High-speed Drone with Global Reach

    What with the European Space Agency now in collaboration with the Russian's and China's newfound interest, it looks like the next space (weapons) race may be on.

  31. Everest by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, after China invaded Tibet Mao told some guys "hey, climb mount everest" (in chinese obviously). And in two years time they had done it, even though there was no tradition of mountain climbing before.

  32. Re:Finally by mark2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why am I not suprised by this article?

    Obviously the US military needs this to stop terrorists - I mean I can see Al Queda buildng some evil doomsday device on the moon. Who do they think Bin Laden is? Dr Evil?

  33. Hmmm by ErikZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let us compare this to one of China's other big projects...The Three Gorges Dam.

    "The president imposed a moratorium on reporting four aspects of the project: alluvial sediment buildup, the more than 100 cracks that have already appeared in the dam, pollution/environmental damage and the return of those who were displaced from the area by the project. The first three issues are not allowed because with the passage of time, China's science and technology will improve, so they can be solved. The last taboo is forbidden because of the threat that it poses to social unity and stability."

    Ah yes, the damn is starting to have problems. Solution? The media is not allowed to mention these problems, and is 'encouraged' to only mention the good stuff.

    This attitude worked somewhat for the Soviets, I'm not sure if it will work for China.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    1. Re:Hmmm by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oops, sorry. Forgot to post the link:

      http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/EF20Ad05.html

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Hmmm by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh yes. Whereas the American media is unbiased and covers any noteworthy event in great detail. That is, unless the government tells them not to.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  34. I feel so inadequate by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here I was thinking we were cool with our particle accelerators. Now China comes along with their Mars accelerator program. Damnit.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  35. Re:Planning versus dreaming by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can draw up elaborate plans to go to Saturn or Uranus, do I have the money?

    Well, I don't know about Saturn...

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  36. Give the russians a little credit by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After all, they seem to have mastered military planes..uh, i mean submarines...domestic cars..nope, sorry, i meant potato crops...doh!

    The russians had a good excuse, the first car was made by a guy called Benz, a German, the first jet powered military planes were made my the Luftwaffa in WWII, and the first effective submarines were the U boats used by Germans Navy in WWI, and we all know that Russians and Germans didn't get along, so it was an act of patriotism to screw up in everything German.

    But seriously, the MIG 29s had the USAF pissing in their pants until they developed the F22, the Typhoon class submarines, although having one unfortunate accedent were generally good ships that could match any Ammerican offering, and anyway, at least they don't come up under civilian boats to show off. The Lada may suck, but they can be made very cheap, and the potato screwup was not as bad as the one the Irish had a while back.

    Seriously, the Russians were very good at what they did, they just had a few mistakes experimenting to try and make the world better, something the American government has never had the balls to do.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  37. The US was behind and ended up first by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah...but keep this in mind. In WWII Germany was flying around in jets and the US was behind them there. Yet for the most part, the US has held the premier position in modern jet technology (of course the EuroFighter just rocks).

    The USSR was the first with their satelite in space. Again, you could have said "The US is so far behind", yet the US was the first to put someone on the moon. We could list a myriad of examples, from computing, steel-work, gun-powder use, and so forth...

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  38. USA too big for its boots? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The phrase "too big for its boots" comes to mind.

    The current administration seems to be of the opinion that the USA is supremely powerful. Now, only a fool would deny that the USA is in a powerful position at the moment, but it is not supremely powerful.

    It is a dangerous state of affairs when the administration thinks that it no longer needs allies. They need to wake up to the fact that the USA is in the position it is in at the moment partly because its allies allowed it to get there, even helped it.

    If the USA really does try to pull stunts like denying other countries access to space, then it might just find out what a difference friends can make. Believe me - Europe, China, India, Russia, Japan - they will react if the USA starts to act stupidly like this. We are already seeming some of the effect of this with collaboration between India and China, for instance.

    I think the administration thinks that the rest of the world can't survive without it. They need to travel a bit more. They will that that, for instance, Europe isn't as different as the USA in terms of size and economy as they seem to think. They will also find that India and China aren't as backwards as they might imagine (for christsakes, many Slashdotters have lots jobs to people from these countries, and not just manual jobs but sophisticated white collar jobs).

    The more the USA talks like this, the more its former allies are going to group together and start collaborating. The USA seems to like to impose sanctions and economic "punishments" on countries that don't collaborate with it at the moment. I wonder how the USA economy would take it if the national governments of places like Europe, Russia, Japan and China start selling their dollar reserves, or imposing import tarrifs on American goods. The USA may find that actually, it does need friends.

    1. Re:USA too big for its boots? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt that Europe will ever get it's act together enough to rival the US militarily

      Why not? Seriously? Europe does not currently have a strong military because it has chosen not to have one, not because it couldn't have one. Europeans prefer their taxes to go towards social programmes rather than military ones.

  39. Re:very possible by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, the version of the Long March launch rocket that lifted the unmanned Shenzhou prototypes into low Earth orbit have more lifting capability than the Delta II rockets we've used to launch probes to Mars, so if China is talking about sending robotic probes to Mars they already have the rocket to do so.

    Whether the Chinese have the technological skills to build a spacecraft that can last several years on a Mars mission is still an iffy proposition, though.

  40. USA? by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light..."

    There is no China-USA space race. Middle America has made it very clear that they do not care about fluff like expensive space programs when the government can instead provide them miniscule tax breaks and 24/7 war coverage. The horrendous mismanagement of NASA funding has become an embarassment to long-time memebers of the Congress, who would rather just sweep the whole idea under the rug and avoid drawing attention to an aging shuttle fleet that they were promising to replace in the 1980s.

    America is no longer in a space race with anything other than the financial mismanagement that threatens to eventually kill manned flight entirely.

  41. Re:OTOH 1.5 gigapeople is a lot by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Our GDP is $10e12, theirs is $6e12, i.e. they make 60%. But wait a minute, scientists and engineers dont make six figures in China, do they? Figuring rougly $100K for scientists and engineers of the required calibre in the US, China can afford the same number at $60K, or twice as many at $30K. Considering US graduate schools are full of Chinese students, their talent is or will soon be at least as good as ours.

  42. China? Bring it on! by bluethundr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only major reason for the space program of the 60's that Amercians are rightly proud of was...in one word...Sputnik! One of the great causes of the malaise our manned space program is suffering from is a syndrome I think of as "political culpibility".

    In other words, no Congressman/Congresswoman is going to push an untried ambitious technological experiment. Such an experiment could well cost the taxpayers a shit-ton of money. If the experiment fails, that money is seen as lost into the NASA sinkhole with absolutely no benefit derived (at least from the point of view of politics, not that of the scientific community). Add to that the potential for loss of human life on manned missions, and what you end up with is a politcal hot-potato that no elected official will want to touch. That's why promising technologies like the Solar Sail are only now becoming realities with the aid of the European Space Agency.

    Of course every NASA technology, dicey as it is by nature, was untried at some point. It's my opinion that the political wherewithal (vis a vis space) only surfaces when there is an external (read:military) threat. That it's a powerful, and ideologically opposed nation like China should, ideally, be just the ticket to fuel the ambitions of our elected officials. It's really the classic Zero Sum Game as originally described by John Von Neuman and later applied to social theory by Robert Wright.

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  43. Fusion Research by idontneedanickname · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you want more information about the research sql*kitten mentions, check out the Focus Fusion Society. Their goal is raise funding for additional R&D in this subject, but they also have a good description of how focus fusion is achieved.