Slashdot Mirror


China Accelerates Mars Program

securitas writes "You read it correctly - Mars. China has announced it intends to accelerate its Mars program, using experience and expertise from its fledgling lunar program. Following China's proposed Moon missions, the first phase would send a Mars orbiter to examine and survey the Red Planet; the second phase will involve wheeled robotic probes like China's Mars Explorer roving vehicle prototype, used to collect and analyze rock samples; and the third phase will involve returning spacecraft from the planet and establishing a permanent automated base on Mars. This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light and clearly indicates that China plans to play with the big boys of Mars exploration."

40 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. How long? by buro9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before NASA's budget sees a major increase?

    1. Re:How long? by PhillC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An increase in the NASA budget would be a very good thing for the future of Government lead space exploration.

      However, the caveat I would add is that as long as this increased spending did not come from social welfare budgets, health, education etc.

      The best place for an increased NASA budget to come from is military spending. If the amount of effort and money that is spent on creating items of destruction was put into space exploration I'd say we'd be in for some exciting times.

      --
      Brought to you by the author of such childrens' classics as "Some Kittens can Fly!" and "All Dogs go to Hell."
    2. Re:How long? by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, the caveat I would add is that as long as this increased spending did not come from social welfare budgets, health, education etc.

      It is not as simple as that. For example, if diverting money from social programmes to industry boosts employment, then the welfare budget can shrink with no ill-effect because fewer people need it. If diverting money from education to space research means that grants for physics postdocs are approved by a different committee than before, then the net result is likely to be little different. If money is diverted from healthcare to orbital laboratories, which then come up with new drugs, then that's actually better for the nation's health.

      The best place for an increased NASA budget to come from is military spending. If the amount of effort and money that is spent on creating items of destruction was put into space exploration I'd say we'd be in for some exciting times.

      A lot of space activity is funded from military spending. The USAF are prolific satellite enthusiasts, for example. That brings down the cost of launching for everyone and funds development of sensors and signal processing technology that can be used by scientists.

      What I would really like to see is some military spending diverted to fusion research. That would be win-win - a scalable power source, both for use on Earth and to power spacecraft on long missions, and it would also meet the military's goal of increasing national security by reducing reliance on the Middle East. Frankly I am surprised that alternative sources of power aren't receiving more interest at present.

    3. Re:How long? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just wait for some old Congressmen to realize that China is only after Mars because it's the Red planet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  2. Interesting, but check the source... by TrueWest175 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The People's Daily is a state-run paper that is usually full of articles about how much students and peasants love the government and how Falun Gong is a dangerous cult. Interesting if they are accelerating the program, but the source is pretty sketchy.

    --


    laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank
    1. Re:Interesting, but check the source... by popeyethesailor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well did you read the article? The article quotes academicians, and they are pretty candid in admitting that they are not ready yet.

      Even the headline says "Space Scientists Say China's Mars Probe 'Years Away'".

      It definitely doesnt sound like propaganda.

    2. Re:Interesting, but check the source... by evilWurst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I trust it this time, but the parent poster does have a point. They could be printing only the positive quotes and leaving out the negative. Kind of like how in the US, every movie, no matter how crappy, has some reviewers supporting it and quoted on the box. China's got 4x the population of the US...I'm sure they can always find *someone* who has the opinion they're looking for.

      Cynical, yes, but I'm only holding China to the same standards of cynicism as I do to the rest of the world :)

  3. This is great by sukottoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is the best thing for the future of space exploration. Competition will lead to innovation, and hopefully to added funding. I think when the American population sees China making great progress towards exploring Mars, there will be more of a demand for American exploration.

  4. Finally by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First the moon, and now mars..

    Could China possibly be trying to hype up its space program to scare other countries? I mean, it just seems kind of odd that all of the sudden, all of these stories about China and space are surfacing..

    I'd like to see a mission before I believe any of it.. seems like China is just preparing for a cold war

    But who knows

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  5. If this is accurate... by GearheadX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the best news we've heard for NASA in a couple of decades. There's nothing like a little compeition with one of the 'evil empires' of the world to get our Congressmen in a spending mood.

    We went to the Moon so that the USSR couldn't get there first, ne?

  6. The more I read of China by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not so sure this is just about getting to Mars and the Moon. I think China is actually attempting to do what we did to the soviet union and trying to get us to escalate in spending in order to quicken an economic collapse. I don't think we're ready for another "cold war" just yet.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  7. Space race by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light and clearly indicates that China plans to play with the big boys of Mars exploration.

    It's not a race in any meaningful sense right now - China has only said it intends to do something that the US has already done, after all. It will become considerably more interesting if a non-NASA space agency - the Chinese, the Indians, the Europeans - announces that it fully intends to land and recover a manned Mars mission before NASA can. My money's on the Chinese - they're the ones with the most to prove, Europe is too apathetic and India cannot devote the resources to it that China's command economy can. As to whether they beat NASA... well that really boils down to the man in the White House. The US/Soviet Empire space race was all about trying to convince the nonaligned nations which political system was the best... it wasn't about scientists competing purely for prestige, it was a battle of national Will. If the US decides that it is going to be impressive enough to take the lead in getting to Mars, then the Chinese would face some stiff competition. Maybe if Russia had more money it could partner with ESA, make it a 3-way race, maybe Japan could join that consortium.

  8. Re:Finally by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, chances are they are just saying this to wind up the US. I'll bet this sort of thing is actually quite a long way down on their list of priorities. Even if they mean it, the cash could easily dry up before it gets that far. The world isn't exactly in a boom economy right now.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. in the spirit of science by rexguo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope China will work with NASA and ESO in a co-operative level instead of with a competitive nature. It will be a shameful waste of Earth's, humans' and economic resources to duplicate what NASA has done (i.e. those that have true scientific value) rather than a I-can-do-it-too. Also, with China's wages problems (mainly those in the agricultural industry) yet seeing results, why is it spending such insane sums of money in an area that will not bring tangible benefits to its people ans standard of living?

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
  11. this just in by t_aug · · Score: 4, Funny

    China has scrapped its mars program to sooner attain its goal of putting a human on the solar surface. Sources quoted as saying "take that you capatalist pigs."

  12. Where's China..? by Larsing · · Score: 5, Funny

    China is light years away from launching Mars exploration programmes

    I didn't know China was in a different solar system(!).
    Would that be Alpha Centauri or Ursa Minor Beta..?

    --
    Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    1. Re:Where's China..? by zero_offset · · Score: 3, Funny

      But I bet the ship they develop will be able to do the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs!

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  13. Put the RED back in Red Planet [EOM] by aaronlev · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry .. groan. I'm sure some news reporter already got to that one.

  14. Re:Seriously, as there is only one human race... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..whay can't they all work together?

    There's a bunch of folks in Tibet been wondering the same thing...

  15. My biggest fear: by Jonsey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I only worry they'll go to Europa, against the old mandate, and start drilling. Once the shambling plant-thing comes up and kills them, then the US will be laughing... Yeah.

    Thank you Arthur.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  16. Re:Seriously, as there is only one human race... by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why can't they all work together?

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  17. But China can save money of safety. by MongooseCN · · Score: 3, Funny

    Judging from it's history, China doesn't have to spend as much money of safety devices and testing.

    Chinese Official: You! Citizen #32185 have been lucky enough to be chosen to fly to Mars!
    Citizen: Wh.. what?
    CO: Put him in the cannon!
    C: What's Mars?
    CO: FIRE!
    BOOM
    Technician: Looks like this one didn't make it to orbit either.
    CO: More gun powder! You! Citizen #32186 have been lucky...

  18. Re:Finally by mickwd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps it's because the US is scaring them.

    I ask you, what could the US possibly do to make the Chinese (and the rest of the world) even more interested in accelerating their space programs than attempting to pull crap like this ?

  19. Land, Land and more land by engineerdude · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're trying to find new homes for the 20 million people displaced by the new dam....

  20. Re:Finally by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That was a great article, and I suggest you mod that post up, if anyone with mod points read this.

    If the US did successfully take control of space in such a way, it could be really damaging to the human race in general... if we want to survive, we will (someday) have to get off this rock, and if the human race as a WHOLE doesn't work together on this goal, we are all doomed.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  21. More Power To Them by aerojad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as humans get into space, I could care less under what flag or what government it is for, just as long as we get out there... and then resist having a war over it.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  22. Re:OTOH 1.5 gigapeople is a lot by alannon · · Score: 4, Informative
    Tax at $1 a head on 1.5GP netts you a lot more spendable than $1 a head on 300MP.
    GDP Per Capita in US: purchasing power parity - $36,300 (2001 est.)
    GDP Per Capita in China: purchasing power parity - $4,600 (2002 est.)

    Source is CIA World Factbook
    Do the math.
  23. Re:Zealots by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The truth of the matter is, they are soooooooooo far behind, how can you call it a race?

    Very simple...

    They dont have to engineer squat. 99.997% of all the engineering and testing is done for them and freely available.. or available for a price. I am sure the country formerly known as the USSR would gladly sell information on how to get your ass in space, to the moon, to mars, to uranus.. (Ok ok.. bad joke...) all they have to do is build. they have more computing power today than the United states had in 1989.. hell if they use linux and a correct implimentation they can have more computing power than the USA has right now.

    The speed of advancement is very fast as the Chineese only have to traverse a very small part of the learning curve.

    I think they can do it... but I do doubt that they will... China is known for 2 things.. Lots of population and propaganda... their government is really good at the propaganda part.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Pardon my French, but by michiel.h · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FUCK the space program.

    China ought to use all that money and invest it in their economy, schools, health system, and anything else _but_ useless look-how-big-my-d1ck-is crap.

    There are hundreds of millions of Chinese living a miserable life and finally their economy is steadily starting to improve. Finally they have a partyleader who actually tries to improve their living conditions, Hu. They should use this money for their country, not try to rival with the US.

    //I lived in China and am currently studying 'Chinese languages and cultures' at Leiden University.

    1. Re:Pardon my French, but by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China ought to use all that money and invest it in their economy, schools, health system, and anything else _but_ useless look-how-big-my-d1ck-is crap

      I'll resist the obvious cheap joke and move straight to the possibility that China could become the low cost payload-lift nation in a decade and get a big chunk of that polynomial-shaped satellite-buisness curve.

      If that kind of wealth/economy/job creation is worthwhile, maybe this R&D effort isn't such a bad bet.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  25. Re:Finally by 2Bits · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to see a mission before I believe any of it.. seems like China is just preparing for a cold war

    Conspiracy theory put aside, I think this is a little bit exagerated.

    The Chinese government (most high level officials who can make major governmental decisions, at least) are mostly practical. You can't really find anyone who is ultra-conservative and xenophobic right now, not those who are in the position to make decisions.

    The major concerns right now to push the economic development as fast as we can (I say we, as I'm Chinese and living in Shanghai), unless there's concern about uncontrollable inflation.

    Most officials now just try to play nice, especially with the US (remember the plan crash incident? Bush was amazingly arrogant at the time, but China kinda backed down not to get the sino-us relation into bad water). A lot of people think the government is spineless. But I think the government made a lot of decisions that are right, given the current situations here (economic, political, scientific, ...etc). China still depends a lot on other countries, and the officials understand that.

    And this is a good thing.

    Sure, China tries to develop other areas of expertise too, so what? What does that have to do with Cold War? Why do we have to think that all scientific research must have anything to do with military conspiracy, especially when it is done in China, India, or Russia?

    Do you think only people in the US love peace? We all do too. Just give us a chance and I believe we can contribute a lot to the progress of humanity too, just we have done in the past.

  26. Re:Finally by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep. Not just "negation", but also other countries have seen the advantage that GPS guided weapons gives to the US, and are no doubt paying keen attention to the US's recently announced global reach weapons plans:

    US to Develop High-speed Drone with Global Reach

    What with the European Space Agency now in collaboration with the Russian's and China's newfound interest, it looks like the next space (weapons) race may be on.

  27. Hmmm by ErikZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let us compare this to one of China's other big projects...The Three Gorges Dam.

    "The president imposed a moratorium on reporting four aspects of the project: alluvial sediment buildup, the more than 100 cracks that have already appeared in the dam, pollution/environmental damage and the return of those who were displaced from the area by the project. The first three issues are not allowed because with the passage of time, China's science and technology will improve, so they can be solved. The last taboo is forbidden because of the threat that it poses to social unity and stability."

    Ah yes, the damn is starting to have problems. Solution? The media is not allowed to mention these problems, and is 'encouraged' to only mention the good stuff.

    This attitude worked somewhat for the Soviets, I'm not sure if it will work for China.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  28. Give the russians a little credit by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After all, they seem to have mastered military planes..uh, i mean submarines...domestic cars..nope, sorry, i meant potato crops...doh!

    The russians had a good excuse, the first car was made by a guy called Benz, a German, the first jet powered military planes were made my the Luftwaffa in WWII, and the first effective submarines were the U boats used by Germans Navy in WWI, and we all know that Russians and Germans didn't get along, so it was an act of patriotism to screw up in everything German.

    But seriously, the MIG 29s had the USAF pissing in their pants until they developed the F22, the Typhoon class submarines, although having one unfortunate accedent were generally good ships that could match any Ammerican offering, and anyway, at least they don't come up under civilian boats to show off. The Lada may suck, but they can be made very cheap, and the potato screwup was not as bad as the one the Irish had a while back.

    Seriously, the Russians were very good at what they did, they just had a few mistakes experimenting to try and make the world better, something the American government has never had the balls to do.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  29. USA too big for its boots? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The phrase "too big for its boots" comes to mind.

    The current administration seems to be of the opinion that the USA is supremely powerful. Now, only a fool would deny that the USA is in a powerful position at the moment, but it is not supremely powerful.

    It is a dangerous state of affairs when the administration thinks that it no longer needs allies. They need to wake up to the fact that the USA is in the position it is in at the moment partly because its allies allowed it to get there, even helped it.

    If the USA really does try to pull stunts like denying other countries access to space, then it might just find out what a difference friends can make. Believe me - Europe, China, India, Russia, Japan - they will react if the USA starts to act stupidly like this. We are already seeming some of the effect of this with collaboration between India and China, for instance.

    I think the administration thinks that the rest of the world can't survive without it. They need to travel a bit more. They will that that, for instance, Europe isn't as different as the USA in terms of size and economy as they seem to think. They will also find that India and China aren't as backwards as they might imagine (for christsakes, many Slashdotters have lots jobs to people from these countries, and not just manual jobs but sophisticated white collar jobs).

    The more the USA talks like this, the more its former allies are going to group together and start collaborating. The USA seems to like to impose sanctions and economic "punishments" on countries that don't collaborate with it at the moment. I wonder how the USA economy would take it if the national governments of places like Europe, Russia, Japan and China start selling their dollar reserves, or imposing import tarrifs on American goods. The USA may find that actually, it does need friends.

    1. Re:USA too big for its boots? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt that Europe will ever get it's act together enough to rival the US militarily

      Why not? Seriously? Europe does not currently have a strong military because it has chosen not to have one, not because it couldn't have one. Europeans prefer their taxes to go towards social programmes rather than military ones.

  30. USA? by supabeast! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This puts the China-India space race and the China-USA space race in a very different light..."

    There is no China-USA space race. Middle America has made it very clear that they do not care about fluff like expensive space programs when the government can instead provide them miniscule tax breaks and 24/7 war coverage. The horrendous mismanagement of NASA funding has become an embarassment to long-time memebers of the Congress, who would rather just sweep the whole idea under the rug and avoid drawing attention to an aging shuttle fleet that they were promising to replace in the 1980s.

    America is no longer in a space race with anything other than the financial mismanagement that threatens to eventually kill manned flight entirely.

  31. Re:No Race, Just Media Hype by evilWurst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure it's a race, just not against who you think. If they get to a man in space soon, they'll beat the European Union, India, and Japan. Passing the EU is worth a lot of prestige, given that those nations once ruled most of the world (including chunks of China!). And getting to the moon means they'll have beaten the EU and Russia, tying the current space champions. Lots of prestige there, obviously. Even though it's already been done, it's obviously still a tough problem if no one else has done it in all this time, and even if they can't surpass every nation, they can surpass n-1 nations now and have at least a chance on the mars race.

    Plus it's a good excuse to advance their local expertise in aerospace materials and computer tech, both of which could get them competitive in the global market for planes and chips.

  32. Fusion Research by idontneedanickname · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you want more information about the research sql*kitten mentions, check out the Focus Fusion Society. Their goal is raise funding for additional R&D in this subject, but they also have a good description of how focus fusion is achieved.