Slashdot Mirror


.Net:... 3 Years Later

Ashcrow writes "EWeek has posted an article on Microsoft's .NET initiative. It's been three years since we were first introduced to .NET and virtually none of the promised advantages have come true. Is it time for Microsoft to move on?"

36 of 906 comments (clear)

  1. nah... by wza · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it time for Microsoft to move on?

    nah, it's time Microsoft to move over...

    --
    bada bing
  2. just a powerful windows scripting environment by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Funny

    as well as a new API for compiled applications. big deal. all I can say is...woo hoo they finaly found something that can replace Basic!!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  3. In Soviet Russia... by gowen · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's called .nyet

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've had that one waiting in the wings for months now haven't you?

      Heh. Dr Pepper tastes funny after going through your nose. Yuck.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  4. You are kidding, right? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you use Linux you obviously won't see the benefits of .NET, maybe that's why you guys haven't seen it. But the improvements have been manifold, let me give you some examples from my own network, which is .NETified:

    1) We have single-source logons for all users, even if they migrate workstations.

    2) Users can access their apps and data from anywhere on the network, even offsite.

    3) Ping times have halved.

    4) You wouldn't believe our uptime, sometimes we go for weeks without rebooting.

    5) The TCO is 1/10th of what it was and we've been able to reduce our IT staff (maybe this is the real reason the /. readership hates .NET?).

    1. Re:You are kidding, right? by mgs1000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would love to have a .net enabled ping utility!

  5. New MS project announced! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called "Microsoft Passport"! I thought it sounded familiar but when I asked, they waved their hands at me and said "This project is new..." so it has to be! Can you imagine the advantages? Logging into hotmail automagically using MS Passport, using Passport as some sort of all-round login system... Heck, you can even use MS Passport as an instant messenging system! Wow!

  6. Time to move on? by bgarcia · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is it time for Microsoft to move on?"
    Yes. After 3 years, they should be coming up with some new innovative idea that they will bet the company on <rolls eyes>.
    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  7. Emperor's New Clothes test... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kid: But there's nothing on .Net!!!
    Joe ServicePack: I think only wise folks can u'stand .Net
    MCSE: .Net rocks
    GNUist: .Net? .Not..
    Microsoft: We're betting our ass.
    IBM: Your ass is grass.
    Sun: Java's the way.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  8. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    virtually none of the promised advantages have come true
    What nonsense. I use .NET every day and it has delivered all of its promised advantages.
  9. whats to see? by chef_raekwon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it time for Microsoft to move on?"

    move along...nothing to see here.....

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  10. Hyperlinking frenzy by palad1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hi,
    I am all for html hyperlinks but I think I can find Eweek's website, as well as microsoft's website and its dot net section, especially after three years.

    Of course I know, I wouldn't be bothered if I didn't try to read the article. Who reads the articles on slashdot anyways?

  11. .Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least it's doing slightly better than GNU/Hurd.

  12. Question by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny


    Has anybody worked out what it is yet?

    1. Re:Question by __past__ · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cheap trick to get around the limitation that there are only 17576 TLAs.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Whatever the question is it must come to 42.

    3. Re:Question by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 4, Funny
      Has anybody worked out what it is yet?

      The result of a bug in Word. It was supposed to be .NOT but Word autocorrected it and nobody noticed.

      --
      http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
    4. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have. I'll summarize it for you.

      .NET is the next generation of Windows system services designed to brig innovation and other advanced technology to the web services and distributed dynamic application runtime deployment industry. It also allows middle tier application service providers to deliver their solutions in a timely and innovative fashion. In addition, it is a game platform designed to revolutionize the ability for developers and end users alike to interact with their systems in a dynamic and innovative way.


      Now do you understand?

  13. Re:So much... by mgs1000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Double or nuthin'?" - Steve Balmer

  14. Re:It can do most of what they say... by GrantZ · · Score: 4, Funny
    Absolutely!

    I am a software engineer and have written apps in Java, VB, and PERL. I have a friend who has been an M$ developer for about 5 years, and just called me a month or 2 ago to let me know that there is this thing called "design patterns" ... just for .Net. There is some M$ website that apparently broke the lid open on the concept of patterns this year (don't know URL). Of course, so did Christopher Alexander in the late 70's, and over 100 others since then... but M$ didn't endorse them until this year. My friend is cool and all, but the general software engineering ignorance was staggering.

  15. Re:Speaking for myself by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    From that perspective, ASP.NET just totally rocks my world. I can debug more easily. Performance is better. It encourages good architectural practices. And my productivity has gone through the roof - I haven't done any formal tests but based on personal experience I'd say I can develop at *least* 30% faster with ASP.NET compared to any other platform, possibly more.

    I absolutely agree. Since discovering .NET my life has changed! I can concentrate for longer, I'm more confident with girls and my armpits have a wonderful spring morning freshness. .NET, because you're worth it!

  16. EWeek is just upset because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    their name change from "PCWeek" to "EWeek" has provided "none of the promised advantages" they claimed when they tried to cash in on the "e" craze just before the bubble burst.

  17. Re:Well... by chef_raekwon · · Score: 5, Funny

    try to cram linux down everyone's throat as the be-all, end-all solution to everything

    ahhh, Linux. The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems....

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  18. .NET Proof Of Concept by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Funny

    .NET proves without a doubt that it is possible for an entire industry to fake an orgasm.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:.NET Proof Of Concept by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Funny

      are you sure it isn't premature ejaculation?

  19. Re:From "Great" to old ideas by OpCode42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.myphonegames.co.uk/nokia-3510i-xtreme-b oxing/

    There you go. Boxing in Java. Don't see your problem... ;)

  20. I'm convinced by TheZax · · Score: 5, Funny

    What nonsense. I use .NET every day and it has delivered all of its promised advantages.

    OK, AC, you have me convinced with your insightful argument.

    I use .NET, AND.ORG/.COM/.EDU every day, and I agree 100%.

    --

    JWall: GUI client for IPTables
  21. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you probably find it better to configure girls through a text file than browsing through an array of boobs, ass, and furburger.

  22. Re:Well... by volve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait, so you mean I actually _am_ using Microsoft Bob to do my work, and I've just grown so used to him [it] that I've stopped noticing?!

    HOLY CRAP THE END IS NIGH!

    -VolVE

  23. Re:It takes insight to notice these things take ti by pmz · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can't really consider C# or Hailstorm to have been around and competing for three years, can you?

    With Microsoft, yes, we can. Anyway, I was suprised to read that it's been three years already. This means we're due for .NET's replacement next year. Perhaps, this time around, we'll see a microkernel architecture with XXML (extensible XML, yea!) all implemented within a web services-based virtual machine. With that in 2004, I can't wait for 2008!

  24. Re:Not all your base belongs to us by nick_urbanik · · Score: 5, Funny
    Your sig (you may change it in response to this, I hope):
    chown -R us ~your/*base*

    Sorry, but I think that you may have meant by your sig:
    find ~your -name '*base*' | xargs chown us

    The problem with your sig is that you only change the ownership of the base immediately below ~/your home directory, not all your base in directories more than one level below. The problem is that the shell will only expand the *base* in the home directory.

    I hope you can further develop your base chowning skills further, so that all of it belongs to us.

  25. Re:Yes by cshark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but platforms aside, I think m$ really alienated their core user base with .net. This should be a lesson to anyone who releases a software product over multiple versions, always implement backwards compatibility.

    Being a Winvicate isn't easy, you know.
    It takes time and money, and I don't think Microsoft really understands how dedicated you have to be to actually defend their actions and business practices, and continue using their second and third rate products.

    My hat goes off to those rich enough, and naive enough to keep the .NET bandwagon rolling!

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  26. Re:Reality is quite nice though by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Funny

    There is no need to reinvent the wheel for enterprise solutions and use do-it-yourself Its costly and takes a lot of time. For Enterprise solutions - just go with java.

    If the wheel is square and made of stone, then many times wheels need to reinvented. Stone, square wheels don't move very fast. Kind of like Java (in more ways than one).

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  27. Sure, I use .NET on vacation... by Demodian · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... to get the .FISH out of the water...

  28. Re:Not all your base belongs to us by nick_urbanik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh dear, doesn't Slashdot value humour?

  29. Re:.Net was never clearly defined by LPetrazickis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fail to see a contradiction between proposition
    A: .net will bind you to MS until the universe collapses
    and proposition
    B: the universe will not collapse

    If I am not mistaken, logic dictates that .net will bind you to MS forever.:P

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.