Slashdot Mirror


NASA Mars Rover Opportunity Lifts Off

Joost Schuur writes "At 11:18 PM EDT on Monday, Opportunity, the second of 2 NASA Mars Exploration Rovers took off aboard a Boeing Delta 2 Heavy rocket after several delays and begun its 305 million mile trip to the Red Planet, where it will join its sister vehicle Spirit, which launched June 10th. Spirit and Opportunity will land on opposite sides of Mars, travelling up to 40 meters a day, and use a series of instruments to search for water, including the Rock Abrasion Tool, which will grind into rocks to give scientists a peak inside. Things are going to get crowded next January in orbit, as both NASA missions join the European Mars Express mission also launched this month and the Japanese Nozomi probe, which would finally complete its troublesome 5 year journey. Those stuck on Earth can take advantage of the closest Mars opposition in 60,000 years and watch with a telescope, or follow the images provided by the International MarsWatch 2003 group."

155 comments

  1. My mouth tastes like band-aids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Linux is for faggots and the English, but I repeat myself...

  2. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first

  3. Poor martians by kinnell · · Score: 4, Funny

    With all these alien robots landing and wandering around probing things, they'll think it's an invasion.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Poor martians by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

      It isn't? Oh, right...it's a "preemptive strike". Sorry, Mr. Bush.

    2. Re:Poor martians by alnapp · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no-one will believe them and they'll all get really paranoid

    3. Re:Poor martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      The irony here is that if there is life on Mars, there would perhaps be fossile remains in the form of oil, which would make us want to regime change Mars, so I guess the martians are lucky not to exist, but on the other hand their non-existence means no oil, so we wouldn't bother them anyway.
      Now if you'll excuse me... the effect of this nasty substance is wearing off...

    4. Re:Poor martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      That's allright ya'll. Preemptive strike is the word that exmplificates this regimes ah supportification for truth, justice and liberty everywhere. Except in Canada, they are way too freedom loving, and they should be prepared for liberation. Bring em on, ya'll. Pretzel.

    5. Re:Poor martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Moderating something as flamebait only confirmed it to be flamebait... since you swalloved it and was affected by it.

    6. Re:Poor martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Actually, Bush was talking about preventive strikes : someone may or might not in a possible future be a treath to us, so let's bomb them just in case.

      A preemptive strike is a response to an imminent attack from an enemy.

    7. Re:Poor martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1


      Like Bush knows the difference.

    8. Re:Poor martians by leshert · · Score: 4, Funny

      In a recent appearance, the Martian information minister released the following statement:

      "There are no infidel alien robots on Mars! Never! We have already destroyed one of their stupid vehicles, and we have another one surrounded on all sides! Let the Earthlings bask in their own illusion! They have not landed, and those that have landed, we will welcome with bullets and shoes!"

    9. Re:Poor martians by falzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      These robots make me very angry, very angry indeed.

  4. Nigger stole my fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Nigger

    1. Re:Nigger stole my fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    2. Re:Nigger stole my fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I WANT TO DRY HUMP BEYONCE KNOWLES.

      Thank you for your attention in this matter.

  5. va lairIE et AL still ignoring reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    having soul DOWt up to their mortgaged .asps.

    yuk.

  6. GNAA Logo contest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    GNAA is looking for talented ASCII artists to provide a quality GNAA logo which can be used in all official GNAA posts on slashdot.

    For more information about the logo contest and how to become a GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) member, please visit the official irc channel #GNAA on efnet.

    The Management

    1. Re:GNAA Logo contest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      good work! i'll join yer group :)

  7. I hope... by ebf · · Score: -1, Troll

    I hope it doesn't lose its Opportunity!
    haha... I'm sooo funny.

    --
    -- Eduardo B. Fonseca
    1. Re:I hope... by DiggiLooDiggiLey · · Score: 0

      That's the Spirit!

    2. Re:I hope... by KDan · · Score: 0

      It's in time like these that you need a "stupid joke" moderation option :-P

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    3. Re:I hope... by ebf · · Score: 0

      Agreed... since we don't have... ;)

      --
      -- Eduardo B. Fonseca
  8. WebCast on Mars Exploration by C0deJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    On the 7th of August there will we a Webcast on "Mars Exploration".

    1. Re:WebCast on Mars Exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on the 9th of August Michael will find out about it.

  9. Terrorist metric system will crush NASA mission ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hehehe.

  10. /. wants my penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    cmdrtaco wants my penis!

    am i a troll, offtopic, or just a cunt?

    1. Re:/. wants my penis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      the mods say troll. congratulations!

  11. Something fishy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    When countries other than the US struggle to even do GPS and nuclear research independently, why and how is it that space missions are suddenly the in-thing? Could it be that the fruits of research and insights already gained aren't shared with the world community? Could it be that the rest of the world does not trust the US and information emanating from it's space research?

    We've made hell of this planet, refusing to share information and killing fellow creatures - why can't we co-operate and work together, atleast while exploring new planets? Do we need to create another Earth-like hell out there?

    1. Re:Something fishy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      maybe you really need to get laid

    2. Re:Something fishy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I second that! He needs to get laid.

    3. Re:Something fishy?? by ReLik · · Score: -1

      True space discoveries will not be uncovered until there is peace in the world, maybe 200 yrs from now, when wars are a thing of the past and we act collectively to achieve common goals in space things will start to happen.

      Right now achievments are pitiful, it's like a land animal looking out at the sea and throwing sticks in and then pulling them out with string, we won't be finding anything special for atleast decades.

      Space exploration is a waste of money, time, and resources. If they found little green men on the moon tomorrow I would probably think 'woah, dude, i bet there's some seriously hot alien arse up there', then i`d sit back in my drunken state for the next couple weeks like always.

      It means shit to me, and i think, most people. how about we sort out the earth first before we go looking for other planets to fuck up?

      Regarding GPS and all the other shit you mentioned, the US is the only country to have GPS, the world relies on America, for now, next decade will see the some of the technological monopoly that America holds fall away, time for a wake-up call for the US and the rest of the world.

      Oh, and nuclear testing? The US did hardly a thing for that themselves, everyone knows they bought/stole the technology from Great Britain and Germany, so much for being independant.

      Look in the damn history books it was all by British and German scientists from the late 1930s (obviously not working together).

      --
      WTF is a sig?
    4. Re:Something fishy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      They are pretty much a front to push the nuclear war in space agenda... seriously... I have been going to the International Space University and this is all I see. I am repeatedly scorned and ostracized for mentioning and words like "peace" and international cooperation. It is all a cheap and shoddy industry based on shady arms deals and garnering more defense dollars; all pretty depressing as well. I can only hope it will eventually go away, and the final frontier might actually open up to us terrans.

      Concerning the Mars RTG (radioactive thermal generators) probes: Again, dangerous environmental hazards trying to pass as science and technology. Watch out!

      Peace,
      SA Thigpen
      KL1FE
      http://sthigpen.freeshell.org

    5. Re:Something fishy?? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it me or did the above post make no sense at all? Without RTG, how are we supposed to explore the outer planets, eh? Without nuclear reactors, how are we supposed to send manned missions to the surface of Mars, Europa, and Titan, eh? There's already radiation in space, a few small nuclear reactors won't hurt anybody.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    6. Re:Something fishy?? by sploxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with RTGs is that they have to be send into space. And they contain a fair amount of highly radioactive plutonium. (Not Pu-239 with a halftime of several thousands of years, but Pu-238 with a halftime of several decades - very poisonous, and obviously more active because of it's shorter halflife)

      You don't really want to let them reenter the atmosphere and cover your city with radioactive dust. That is a problem. Maybe one can place the radioactive stuff into (nearly) unbreakable shells. Nasa et al. are already doing it, but a small risk remains.

      Earth swing-bys are another reason of concern.

      Before the launch of the Cassini mission, several groups tried to stop it - also because it had an earth-swingby on it's schedule. Fortunately, all went ok.

      The other thing are the nuclear reactors they are planning to put on deep space missions. IMHO, they are muss less dangerous. Why? Sounds silly?
      No. They have to be made critical and before that, they are far from being as radioactive as RTGs.

      I once visited a science reactor and a staff member told me that they transport the *fresh* fuel rods by hand, only wearing gloves to protect themselves from the U-235 alpha emitter/fuel.
      Of course several men at once are doing it, they are probaly very heavy :)

      The burned rods are the stuff that is so dangerous. You could not even stand by them for more than a few seconds without being killed by their radiation.

      Of course space agencies should only issue the "start the reactor"-command to a space probe if it is impossible that it gets on a collision course with earth. That would be the case if it e.g. is in orbit around saturn/jupiter.

    7. Re:Something fishy?? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      What about the two dozen or so nuclear submarines rotting away on the ocean floor? Nobody seems to have a problem with them.

      Also, the amount of radiation from the amount of plutonium in the Cassini probe, should it have broken up in the earth's atmosphere for some reason, would be miniscule. (I don't have the exact figure, but my source is "The Case for Mars" by Robert Zubrin.) However, RTGs have a very low power density, making nuclear reactors a much more attractive option. (For those who don't know, RTGs, or radioactive-thermal generators, produce energy from the heat from nuclear decay. Therefore, the more radioactive the material, the more energy for the probe.)

      In America, we're very good at making sturdy, mobile nuclear reactors with our submarine experience, and since they won't even be started until they're far away from Earth, there's really no threat, since, as was stated, people regularly handle the fuel rods with just gloves.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    8. Re:Something fishy?? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      > What about the two dozen or so nuclear submarines rotting away on the ocean floor? Nobody seems to have a problem with them.

      In europe, quite a few care about russian nuclear submarines. At least they are saying it ;)
      The cassini probe has probably been more attacked because people see the direct link to the air they breathe.

      Off topic: Nevertheless, the highly radioactive reactors in the submarines are a problem. But there are many, many problems to solve...
      And e.g. unsecured nuclear weapons are concerning me more than submarine reactors.

    9. Re:Something fishy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The cassini probe has probably been more attacked because people see the direct link to the air they breathe.

      Well, deluded by the junk science link, anyway.

      The Cassini protestors were full of bullshit, plain and simple.

  12. Probe Names by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, we've got Red Rover, I suppose we'll be sending Goofy to Pluto, and Lincoln to Mercury, Chevy to Saturn, and I'm afraid to ask what kind of probe well be using on Uranus.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Good think we are sending supermodels (Naomi) to mars, I don't think they'd launch any pre-emptive strikes after checking out our supermodel lineup.

    2. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Ok, ok ... I'm from German and I do-not get the joke. What is it funny about sending a probe to Uranus?

    3. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess he was worried about using bmw or vw as names after running out of american makes..:-)

    4. Re:Probe Names by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      > Ok, ok ... I'm from German and I do-not get the joke. What is it funny about sending a probe to Uranus?

      OMG...so many punchlines, so little time. Does the word Goatse mean anything to you?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Probe Names by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Charmin?

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
    6. Re:Probe Names by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 0

      >>I'm afraid to ask what kind of probe well be using on Uranus

      Klingons.

      The Klingons will be circling Uranus.

      --
      Huh?
    7. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      The word "Uranus" sounds like "your anus".

    8. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      i see how ist that funny then?

    9. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm afraid to ask what kind of probe well be using on Uranus.

      That would be the Cue:Cat.

    10. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, we've got Red Rover, I suppose we'll be sending Goofy to Pluto, and Lincoln to Mercury, Chevy to Saturn, and I'm afraid to ask what kind of probe well be using on Uranus.

      Either the Exlax probe to get space exploration moving again, or the TP probe to try and clean up waste.

    11. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If du probes Sie anus, das would be funny. But it is Uranus, like "you're anus". Vould yoo like me tew probe you're anus?
      It's funny if you're 3 years old.

      Ach mein lieben!@

    12. Re:Probe Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you actually used "you're" when you quite clearly meant "your". Twice.

  13. Wow. by bulletproof+troll · · Score: -1, Troll

    Let's hope NASA doesn't royally fuck up again. Maybe this time it'll just be our tax dollars lost again.

  14. Best /. article I've seen in a while! by LeoDV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So many links from so many different sources, and so thorough, congrats to the poster!

    1. Re:Best /. article I've seen in a while! by squaretorus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could almost beleive he had some actual knowledge of the subject - rather than just having stumbled about an article on BBC news that mentions linux or gamers or how all geeks are gay that he hadn't seen posted on /.

    2. Re:Best /. article I've seen in a while! by opk · · Score: 1

      I'd bet it was preprepared, especially considering that it claims that the European Mars Express was also launched "this month" when it was launched last month.

    3. Re:Best /. article I've seen in a while! by jschuur · · Score: 1

      opk: You caught me! Slight oversight on the 'this month' part.

    4. Re:Best /. article I've seen in a while! by anshil · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  15. Just imagine the surprise... by scsirob · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... if one of those rocks they drill in turns around, screems "OOUUCH!!" and hits back...

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Just imagine the surprise... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... if one of those rocks they drill in turns around, screems "OOUUCH!!" and hits back...

      ...or burns "No Kill I" into a nearby rock...

      ...or challenges Kirk, Spock, President Lincoln, and the Vulcan god-like dude to fight a bunch of outlaws.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Just imagine the surprise... by Farrell · · Score: 1

      ...or takes over the computer system and wreaks havoc on our ships and rovers

      --
      I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
    3. Re:Just imagine the surprise... by smithmc · · Score: 1


      ...or chooses that particular moment to deeble.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  16. good to see nasa doing some serious science by PhysicsExpert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Its good to see NASA responding well with some serious missions after the Atlantis disaster. After all the cutbacks during the Clinton era I really thought it might get to the point where they did nothing but put satellites into orbit.

    What would really interest me however would be if they switched their attention from Mars to Venus. Most scientists agree that life on Mars is not feasable wheras Venus, which is closer to the sun, has a far more interesting chemical makeup. Although too hot for any carbon based lifeforms to be found, many scientists have thought that in Venus's rich ammonia lakes a Silicon based life could have emerged. Although these would be very basic forms of life (not as advanced a monkeys) discovering them would mean that we could no longer view ourselves as being at the center of the universe.

    --
    All that glitters has a high refractive index.
    1. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Atlantis? What happened to Atlantis? I thought it was Challenger, then Columbia, right?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Rxke · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Man, that was funny! I almost went for it...

    3. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      No, it was Atlantis. It sank. It was horrible.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    4. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by dylan_- · · Score: 4, Funny
      Atlantis? What happened to Atlantis?
      Their entire civilisation was destroyed by a flood, which is pretty disasterous by any reckoning! I'm surprised you hadn't heard about it...
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    5. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by nshravan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess as the others pointed out, you were referring to Columbia and STS-107.

      Actually I am pretty sure this mission has been in the books for quite sometime. Especially since Earth and Mars are supposed to be in the closest configuration with respect to their orbits. A trip to Mars right now will take approximately 7-8 months and the two rovers(Spirit and Opportunity) should get to Mars by January.

      Also, its not just NASA which has used the current orbit position as an advantage; the European Space Agency(ESA) and the Japanese Space Agency(NASDA i think) have also launched their respective payloads to Mars.

      About Venus, I doubt if NASA will come out with a program. A whole load of factors , not the least scientific goes into allocating budget to programs. And especially right now, I would think it would be really hard for NASA to convince the govt., to fund a program to Venus. The question of selling it to the public ranks high up there among the criteria and seems tough to me.

    6. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1
      Although these would be very basic forms of life (not as advanced a monkeys) discovering them would mean that we could no longer view ourselves as being at the center of the universe.

      Oh, finding some extraterrestrial robo-bacteria would somehow unseat us from the center of the universe?? What are they going to do, throw a mitochrondria at us? Now, if we found Unicron or something, I'd be more interested.
      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    7. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      YHBT. PhysicsExpert is a known troll.

    8. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I do not think that spectacular science is necessarily serious science. My guess is that most "serious science" takes place in anonym places, where scientists work during years on things not as impressive as a rocket launch.

      I'm not saying that the Mars exploration is not important, I'm only worried about science without big budgets and TV cameras being considered "not serious".

    9. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I wonder if life on Venus would have the same problems as the probes we sent there before - a very limited life span before being destroyed by the conditions on the planet.

      I wonder if we sent something modern if it'd survive longer than the average hour that the Russian landers lasted.

      I'd love to see some good footage from around the planet - would probably rival hollywood's wildest dreams.

    10. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by ToSeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mars is much more likely than Venus to have had life in the past. There are definite indications of water, past and present, and while life would be difficult on the surface, just underneath is a definite possibility.

      There is virtually zero chance of life on the surface of Venus, and it's way too hot for any kinds of lakes other than, say, lead. Ammonia, which evaporates at room temperature even on Earth, is right out. However, there is a benign zone in Venus's upper atmosphere, deep enough to avoid nasty radiation from the Sun but high enough to be temperate, that might possibly host life.

    11. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by kindbud · · Score: 1

      You mods are on crack. Ammonia lakes on the 900 F surface of Venus? Silicon life forms? Are you all John Edwards fans, or what?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    12. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Oh shut up. Nobody cares about your research into the chemical make up of bird shit. Quit your incessant whining and learn to deal with it.

    13. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking daft? Reductions during the CLINTON era? They're the ones that poured cash INTO the space program. As soon as Dubya came to power, he cut back all of the IIS missions. Good grief foo.. get your facts straight.

      PS- It was Columbia dumbass, not Atlantis.

    14. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Grammarnazis puhleezz have mercy with us nonnatives

      ...have mercy on us...

    15. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Cyno · · Score: 1

      discovering them would mean that we could no longer view ourselves as being at the center of the universe.

      Well, until I get a little more cooperation from all of you I must insist that I am at the center of the universe. Now please have all of your scientists conduct long studies and make time-consuming measurements and I'll have mine do the same. Eventually we'll get to the bottom of this, we're predicting the results will be in sometime next century.

    16. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by IronChef · · Score: 1

      many scientists have thought that in Venus's rich ammonia lakes a Silicon based life could have emerged

      MANY scientists? Can you name some of them? Silicon-based life is a load of hooey. Call me BiochemistryExpert.

      And there are no lakes of any kind on Venus.

      Where did you get this stuff, some 50's sci-fi magazine?

    17. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I work for NASA, and yes, these rovers have been in the pipe for years and years.. everything we do takes years and years. We are already planning mars missions through 2009. Interestingly, in 2009 theyre talking about sending a RTG powered (essentially nuclear powered) rover to mars. Can't wait till the press gets ahold of that one.

      (oops?)

    18. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by smokestacklightning · · Score: 1

      If it's the chance for extra-terrestrial life your after, the many moons of Jupiter are our best best. For example, Europa is thought to be quite seismically active and possibly sports an oxygen based atmosphere. Io and Ganymede might harbor E.T.'s as well.

    19. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by corleth · · Score: 1

      Re: Venus, ESA are planning a Venus Express mission, re-using most of the spare components of Mars Express, to be launched in 2005. More details are at http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fa reaid=64.

    20. Re:good to see nasa doing some serious science by le+duf · · Score: 1

      Well, they are heading back to Mercury, with a launch date of 10 March 2004. This is something the scientific community has been waiting for for long time (the only previous visit were 3 fly-by by Mariner 10 in 1974-1975). As far as I'm concerned, the space probes have been much more exciting profitable (in a scientific sense) than the manned missions (and I do think the Apollo landings were boffo cool), especially the shuttle missions and the space station.

  17. Don't Disturb The Natives! by Josuah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like these rovers are going to do some "damage" to the habitat of those Martians. Is that such a good idea? Grinding into so-called "rocks". Trampling around on big wheels. All going, "Show me the water!" and "Take that, dust-particle sized life-form!" I think we're in for some heavy retaliation. Me, under the bed sounds like a good place right now.

    1. Re:Don't Disturb The Natives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see a little martian saying on martian tv.. "the earthlings are being defeated as we speak. their probes have been destroyed and we are taking over their planet right now." big drill go through his head.. muhahah, the probes with their massive size (compared to them) start being worshiped as gods.

  18. Additional media coverage at... by RALE007 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Astrobio.net

    planetary.org

    Discovery.com

    Some of the context is redundant, the first link is the most informative.

    --
    Beware blue cats moving at .99c
  19. LIEk the guise who stole yOUR 'future' monIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    they just rename themselves, & go back to being fauxking larcenious billyonerrors.

    acknowledging that many in the 'space' industry' are of honorable intent, it all gets lost in the cost .controlls.

    what's wrong with knowing what things really cost (see also: whoreabull warmongering), then deciding if it's worth it.

    killing astronauts is bad enough. killing babies will not be tolerated.

    lookout bullow. consult with yOUR creator.

  20. UNIX GUIs - how sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Its been quite a while since I last did any editing under UNIX. All I can
    say is that now that I'm doing this kind of thing again, in comparison
    to equivlent windows development tools, the UNIX ones SUCK - big
    time. Totally inconsistent GUIs across everything. Each tool exhibits
    odd behaviors unique only to itself.

    Example: If I want to search for a string or select a line number, the
    requester window that pops up appears in the upper left of the desktop,
    well away from the editors main window. To make matters worse, the
    window does not have input focus which means that I have to physically
    move the mouse to the widow and click in it. If I don't remember this - which is
    most of the time - and start typing a string or a line number, I end up messing up
    the code that i'm editing. This is the more serious if I don't realise what I've done.

    The bloody editor doesn't even show you the line number that you're on! God forbid
    that as a programmer i'd want to know what line I'm on ... Don't even get me started
    on Emacs - now theres a whole book worth of complaints just brewing.

    I am switchng to using VI because, at the very least, the editor is consistent in its
    behavior, despite its archaic style. I'm sure that you can guess that I have been doing
    a lot of loud swearing recently.

    The really sad thing is that the other UNIX developers find every
    opportunity to tell me how much they hate Windows, yet still, I find
    them using Microsoft Visual Studio (on a PC) to browse the UNIX
    source code and to do a lot of other things that are next to
    impossible or very tedious under UNIX.

    Our sysadmin resigned. One of the things that I had requested
    was exporting my UNIX home directory as writable to my PC. At
    the very least I'd be able to use a proper/well-designed editor.
    To save money they will not be replacing the sysadmin ....

    Each to their own, I guess.

    1. Re:UNIX GUIs - how sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      try kate, great editor that comes with kde. or you could take a shower and maybe get laid for once.

  21. moron va lairIE's pateNTdead PostBlock(tm) device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    it still sucks the bIEg won.

    tell 'em robbIE. it was not you who took sum of the monIE?

    it was not you who illegitimized the SourceForgerIE(tm)?

    it was not you who sub-directed va.gov.msn.?net?..working?, aka trustworthycomputing.com.

    so obliviously, it is not you whois practicing censorship to protect your corepirate nazi sponsors?

  22. A "peak" inside by jackjumper · · Score: -1, Redundant

    That's "peek"...sheesh...

    1. Re:A "peak" inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until Mr. Pecker here,,,

      That's "Peck"...

  23. badum-cha! by the+uNF+cola · · Score: -1, Troll

    40 meters a day

    Wow.. it'll take a while to get there. /rimshot

    --

    --
    "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  24. Please tell me..... by JaJ_D · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....they have picked between metric and/or imperial to give measurements in so they don't park the thing at high velocity into Mars.

    Remeber...... Faster, Better, Cheaper

    Please delete as applicable.

    1. Re:Please tell me..... by jschuur · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Please tell me..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch them overcompensate. This time, Opportunity will come in for a perfect landing, crushing Spirit in the process.

    3. Re:Please tell me..... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > [Please tell me] they have picked between metric and/or imperial to give measurements in so they don't park the thing at high velocity into Mars.
      >
      > Remeber...... Faster, Better, Cheaper

      "...Choose any two."

  25. ah, spirit and opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    ...2 things that made the US what it is today

    next year they'll launch bigmouth

  26. STFU douchebag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Please go back to your cabin and stay off our Internet for a while, k? Tks.

  27. Political Statement Here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Individual tries to impose his fascist views onto others. Please help the Foundation for Freedoom of Speech on Slashdot (FFSS). Thank you.

  28. And from michael too... someone call satan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ... and find out if he needs a heavy jacket down there.

  29. Atlantis disaster? by CausticPuppy · · Score: -1, Troll

    Are you talking about those pesky kids that accidentally got launched into orbit by an annoying, gay robot during their visit to Space Camp?

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  30. And my name went with them... by Quizo69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    3,551,645 names were submitted to the NASA site for launch on the two rovers. They have a nice picture of it with explanation here:

    http://www.planetary.org/rrgtm/dvd.html

    Let's hope this doesn't /. NASA and send the rovers off course ;)

    It's strangely comforting to know that my name will be up there forever (well at least until we colonise Mars and enshrine the little discs somewhere)!

    Quizo69

    1. Re:And my name went with them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The DVD is made of silica glass rather than plastic so that it can withstand the high temperatures necessary to sterilize it of Earth microbes before it is sent to the Martian surface. Also, the silica glass has a much longer lifetime than typical commercial DVDs?in fact, the silica glass DVD could last more than 500 years. The DVD will remain on the lander as a time capsule for a future generation.

      Do you think anyone will have a drive that will be able to read our names in 500 years?
    2. Re:And my name went with them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2050 - "Wow these goddamn aol disks got everywhere!!" *scrunch*

    3. Re:And my name went with them... by heneon · · Score: 1

      So, they went on to create a silica glass dvd mounted on a lego brick assebmly and sent it 305 million miles away, only to realize afterwards that Mars doesn't have Region 1 dvd players. duh.

  31. With apologies to HG Wells by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The chances of anything coming to Mars, are a million to one they said, but still they come."

    With the luck Nasa has had recently exploring Mars, I don't think we're going to disturb anyone there.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  32. oh, the name is opportunity... i thought... by *weasel · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...maybe that you were just suggesting that this was an opportunity to get another rover on mars.

    because after the last couple attempts, just because they launch doesn't seem to mean a guaranteed placement.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  33. Here's the text in case of /. by Quizo69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Red Rover Goes to Mars Spacecraft DVD

    A Planetary Society produced mini-DVD will fly on each Mars Exploration Rover spacecraft, mounted to the lander petals as shown here. These DVDs are designed to engage and involve the public in numerous ways. After landing on Mars the rover will capture an image of the DVD before driving away from the lander.

    Each DVD carries nearly four million Mars enthusiasts? names collected by NASA. Each DVD also includes engaging designs leading to other activities. Each DVD?s engaging design includes the ?Astrobot? LEGO mini-figure representation in the middle, magnets to collect dust, colors to study color appearance under a Martian sky, LEGO brick representations to engage kids, and secret codes around the outside to be decoded from images on Mars. Astrobots Biff Starling and Sandy Moondust (one on each DVD central oval) are LEGO minifigure representations suited up for space. Their job: tell their stories to the world through a series of entertaining online communications between themselves and the ground available via the Web.

    The DVD is made of silica glass rather than plastic so that it can withstand the high temperatures necessary to sterilize it of Earth microbes before it is sent to the Martian surface. Also, the silica glass has a much longer lifetime than typical commercial DVDs?in fact, the silica glass DVD could last more than 500 years. The DVD will remain on the lander as a time capsule for a future generation.

    The DVD assembly?s base, the simulated LEGO bricks, and the central oval are made of machined and anodized aluminum. The aluminum parts are separated from the silica glass DVD with Delrin pads. Delrin is an inflexible polymer that is very tough and heat resistant.

    The entire assembly, which weighs 69 grams, has been subjected to a battery of tests designed to simulate the extreme environmental conditions of the journey to Mars: temperature cycling from 125 to 60 degrees Celsius, exposure to vacuum, high-speed random vibration, and shocks of 4,000 times the acceleration of Earth?s gravity.

    The Planetary Society, in collaboration with the LEGO Company, provided the DVDs to NASA for the Mars Exploration Rover mission. Visionary Products, Inc. implemented the DVD mounting assembly, Plasmon OMS donated the silica glass DVDs and data etching, and the magnets were donated by the Danish magnet team who also have other magnets on the spacecraft.

  34. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could that Boeing Delta 2 Heavy rocket link *have* more popups? Who do they think they are, a porn site?

    1. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you put any *more* emphasis in your words? Who do you think you are, Chandler Bing?

  35. Better for everyone by LittleKing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I'm being a bit idealistic, but I think the different space programs from around the world should work together to get to Mars and do research.

    Although if you look at the ISS, that has been hampered with cost and other problems from each country. Also it could limit the research and intelligence that is gather.

    6 on way, 1/2 dozen the other

    --
    Art by Mindy Herman, my wife.
    1. Re:Better for everyone by marcel-jan.nl · · Score: 1

      Interesting you say this, because in a recent newspaper article I read that coorporation between nations seems a lot to be left desired for.

      This makes one wonder: Another high-res camera? Do we really need to verify existence of water again with basically the same kind of instruments on board of an orbiter?

    2. Re:Better for everyone by LooseChanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What would be best is building infrastructure, not flags & footprints.

      --
      Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    3. Re:Better for everyone by UberDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're being a bit idealistic! The best thing about having lots of different space programs is that you end up with lots of different approaches to the problem. And the best thing about that is that you maximise the potential that one of them will succeed.

      It's like egg fertilisation - why release one big sperm when you can send millions of little ones and increase the odds of one getting through!

      Having lots of space programmes is just like making love to a beautiful woman.

  36. Deep Space Network Overload? by goatbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is the Deep Space Network (DSN) going to handle 7 spacecraft at Mars? It was tough enough with just 2 orbiters. Anyone in the know want to comment?

    1. Re:Deep Space Network Overload? by Rxke · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is a problem, but at least they saw it coming. it's not only those craft, also a bunch of other important missions need a lot of attention, Cassini/Huygens, The cometchasers, et.c. are al nearing important phases of their mission. Last thing i read somewhere, it that they built an extra telesope (radio) in Spain (IIRC) So, it'l be a lot of juggling, and timing tings to the max but i guess they're ready for it. (well, let's hope so, Interplanetary /.ing wouldn't look too good, after al that work and money invested...

    2. Re:Deep Space Network Overload? by ToSeek · · Score: 1

      It's been anticipated, and DSN is being upgraded and expanded to meet the crunch:

      Bracing for an interplanetary traffic jam

  37. Venus by Cujo · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are Venus missions under study now. The leading one is called the Venus In-Situ Explorer.

    See http://spacescience.nasa.gov/missions/concepts.htm

    --

    Helium balloons want to be free.

  38. Good show by LooseChanj · · Score: 1

    Hella loud, hella bright, and hella fast. In fact, this launch climbed much much quicker than I've ever seen before.

    --
    Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
    1. Re:Good show by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      It was the first night launch I've seen since relocating to Florida. Ok, so I'm a big kid thats easily amused.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:Good show by ToSeek · · Score: 1

      With all the launch delays it was late, so it has to hurry to catch up.

  39. First transmission from probe as it leaves Earth by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Funny

    wheeeeeeee!

  40. Enough with the probes by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People are better than robots at exploring a planet. We need to put people on Mars. Mars Direct will get them there. All we need is the will to do it.

    And before you go arguing how it will be so expensive, bear in mind that it would only be a 7% increase in NASA's budget for the next 10 years, and that would give us 5 manned missions.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Enough with the probes by sploxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > 7% increase in NASA's budget for the next 10 years
      7% increase once and that 10 years long or
      every year a 7% increase, for ten years?
      That makes a *BIG* difference. Does anyone want to let NASA's budget grow exponentially?

    2. Re:Enough with the probes by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, should have made that more clear. The 7% increase is a one-time thing, but it should probably be adjusted for inflation if necessary.

      Incidentally, this would bring NASA's budget up to the level of spending during the Apollo program, adjusted for inflation, of course.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:Enough with the probes by rk · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your enthusiasm, and I agree that we need to get people to Mars, and I'm a big fan of Zubrin's work.

      With that said, I don't think it's an either/or proposition. We have 6+ billion people on this planet and we still have a lot of good science that is done with orbiters around Earth. The rovers are being sent to two different likely places where we may find evidence of life, past or present. I view these missions as information gathering for what I hope are the inevitable manned missions to Mars. The current missions (MGS, Odyssey, MER, Express) and follow on missions (MRO, LRR, Sample Return, others) will enable us to get more "bang for the buck" when humans do finally arrive there.

    4. Re:Enough with the probes by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      While I agree that probes are beneficial for science, they don't seem to fit into a "Get People on Mars" strategy. NASA just seems to be launching these things in the hopes that they'll find life on their own, not to help bring people to the planet.

      For example, a mission involving an orbiter and a few hundred micro-probes to land at various points on Mars and develop a climatological/meteorilogical profile would provide more practical data than a single, expensive probe designed to "find evidence of life." Or a rover designed to look for water, a key in human colonization and eventual terraforming. Or a series of orbiters to provide a GPS-like system for navigation and positioning on the surface. Or a communications orbiter to provide a link back to Earth for the astronauts and probes or weather stations.

      This would be similar to the Apollo program. The Mercury and Gemini programs were precursors to it, and they helped build the procedural and technological foundations for the moon landings.

      It seems to me that what NASA needs is a plan more than some rovers.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:Enough with the probes by QuantumFTL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People are better than robots at exploring a planet.

      I'm not sure how valid of a claim that is. Certainly, right now our probes aren't that great, mainly because there is little actual autonomy. However, in the near future, probes will be built to handle major decisionmaking on their own. Our best hope for exploring the most of Mars is to send thousands of small autonomous probes that will do the looking around for us. This could be done for roughly the same cost as the manned mission, without the PR risk (yes, I hate it but it's very true) that manned missions currently represent.

      I work at the Jet Propulsion Lab, and many of the robotics technologies that are currently being persued there should give us the capability to collect huge amounts of useful data on Mars in the next 20 years or so.

      Is manned flight expensive? Well not really, but the price/performance ratio isn't that great compared to what will be done in the next 20 years with robotics probles (remember economy of scale, 1000 probes isn't much more expensive to build than 1).

    6. Re:Enough with the probes by anshil · · Score: 1

      How about exploring mars first before we "destroy" it with our stuff?

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    7. Re:Enough with the probes by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > [Zubrin's Mars Direct] would only be a 7% increase in NASA's budget for the next 10 years, and that would give us 5 manned missions.

      And if Congress doesn't wanna increase NASA's budget, how about we scrap the Shuttle and ISS and use the savings to fund a permanent presence on Mars, rather than just low earth orbit?

      The Shuttle will have to be retired and replaced with a better manned launch system in 10 years anyways.

      What would you rather have by 2010? A shuttle replacement, or a permanent Mars base AND a shuttle replacement?

  41. Rock Abrasion Tool by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    "Hey, Quaid! It's me, remember? Bennie's the name. I'm gonna drill you, sucka!"

    1. Re: Rock Abrasion Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your ass to mars
      Get your ass to mars
      Get your ass to mars

  42. Should we be going there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think we've really seen enough evidence to suggest that Water might exist in a Measurable and Detectible (WMD) manner.
    Without such hard evidence, I don't see justification for going in there and invading like that.

  43. What's the big news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    That NASA managed to launch a rocket without blowing it up? Or that it managed not to kill 7 people?

  44. yeah, but... by tomdarch · · Score: 1

    You still cant use your JR pass on the Nozomi probe!

  45. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PhysicsGenius is a well-known troll. What Atlantis disaster? Silicon life forms on Venus? Do you even READ the comments, mods?

  46. Another good official site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The official site for the team that made all the science instruments is here: http://athena.cornell.edu

  47. More likely because Venus is *difficult* by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Only the Russians have landed a probe on Venus, which took a couple of pictures then instantly fried under the heat and pressure of the Venusian atmosphere.

    Mars is relatively easy.

    I'll still never forgive Time for thinking Nadia Comaneci was more important that the first pictures from the surface of Mars. (Even though I did have a bit of a crush on her at the time....)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  48. My kids names are already there!!! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    NASA did the same thing for the Mars Polar Explorer. You could submit the names which NASA put on a CD and you could print out a certificate commemorating the fact.

    I did this for both of my kids entire classes which they got quite a kick out of. "Ooooh, my name is gonna be on MARS!!"

    Then it crashed.....

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:My kids names are already there!!! by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Well... If it helps... Mars Polar Explorer crashed on Mars. So, your kids names are there... somewhere.

    2. Re:My kids names are already there!!! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Ummmm.

      Hence the title of my post...

      It would have been nice if had landed as expected then there would have been more press about the names. Once it was lost, so were the names in the eyes of the press.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  49. Easier than you think by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's not so hard. Each mission is on a separate frequency, so you just add extra receivers to share each ground antenna. Even the largest DSN antennas have beamwidths wide enough to take in all of Mars plus the nearby orbital space. (A 64m dish has a beamwidth of about 144 arc-seconds at X-band, while Mars as seen from Earth is currently about 20 arc-seconds in diameter.)

    Also remember that Spirit and Opportunity are going to opposite sides of the planet, so generally only one will use the DSN at a time.

    1. Re:Easier than you think by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh, another thing helping the crunch at the DSN is the end of the Galileo mission. When the X-band high gain antenna failed to deploy, the S-band omni antenna was used to salvage the mission.

      This placed an enormous strain on the DSN's resources. The very low data rate required more tracking time to transfer a given amount of information, and multiple antennas at each site were often arrayed to increase the received signal. The end of Galileo frees these antennas for other missions.

      I visited the Canberra DSN site in September 1997. While I was there, Jupiter rose and most of the antennas at the site were pointed at it. Very impressive to see them all moving together.

    2. Re:Easier than you think by rk · · Score: 2, Informative

      And add to that that the ESA is finishing up work on their own tracking station facilities. The DSN and thier European counterparts will be busy (they always are), but they can handle the load.

      With that said, the DSN is getting up there in age and many of the antennae need upgrading and/or replacing. Hopefully, there will be budget money in the coming years to deal with this.

    3. Re:Easier than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeh I work on the DSN and this is one of the things we're doing. Real soon now one antenna (the limited resource here, really) will be able to receive signals from multiple spacecraft at the same time (didn't used to be able to do this).

      It's a little more complicated than "you just add extra receivers", but that is the gist of it.

  50. Peak Inside? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    which will grind into rocks to give scientists a peak inside

    Wow, they're going to grind rocks down into mountains! I'd really like to peek inside those rocks to see where they hide those hills!

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  51. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right about the Clinton cutbacks. Bush is a worse than useless president, but Clinton really, really hurt the space program.

  52. Visualization by captaineo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You guys might want to check out my visualization of the launch. (there is also a link to a longer animation including landing and Mars operations):

    http://www.maasdigital.com/gallery.html

    /shameless plug...

  53. too young! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks the moderators are too young to remember this obscure movie reference...

  54. Check out the CGI animation of the mission! by smokin'moses · · Score: 4, Informative

    When my family and I were visiting KSC a few weeks ago, to hopefully watch this launch :-( my wife pulled me over to a video screen that was playing a really well done simulation of the launch/flight/landing that underlined the elegance of the methods used for each stage of the trip to mars. It's really nice watching the various parts fall away and new goodies deploy for each part of the trip.

    After a quick search on the web once we got home, I found lesser quality versions of the film.

    A couple are here:

    http://athena.cornell.edu/the_mission/rov_video. ht ml

    http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/video/anima ti on.html

    I think the animator's site had the best quality one, in MPEG. I think his name is Maas.

    If you like eye candy, this is sort of a factually based minds-eye type video. I think it's really good CGI, but I'm no expert.

    I'd read about the mission, and spinning the probe up for the big burn, and reeling out weights to spin down, etc, but it's not until I saw it on the screen, that the grace and elegance of all the solutions to the various problems of sending this probe to mars really hit me.

    Seeing this film makes me feel good about paying my taxes.

  55. Mars missions planned 5 years ahead by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Mars missions are planned at least five years in advance. The 2006 and 2008 ones are being developed. So the Columbia disaster has little immediate impact

  56. Costs Baby... by Nazmun · · Score: 2, Informative

    It costs more to send a shuttle up in orbit then to send a probe 300 million miles away and land on an alien planet.

    The two rovers are sent for 800 million, each costing 400 million that way. Shuttles still cost 500 million per launch. This doesn't count any of that extra stuff, like repairs and maintenance that need to happen. Also the cost of building these shuttles are not in that 500 million number, often shuttle trips will cost more.

    Besides will men really be that much better at examining red rocks then a probe. Also those rovers are hardly autonomous, we control them from here.

    With that said, i'd really wish nasa was given the budget it needs, at least $30 billion. I mean although they're budget has really decreased over the years inflation has caused that $15 billion to be worth less and less every year. They really need to build some better probes, and work on IMPROVING space travel with new ships/planes/vehicles rather then using old expensive tech over and over again.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  57. odd name ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now, "NASA's spirit and opportunity crushed after one five cent bolt found faulty"

  58. Re:moron va lairIE's pateNTdead PostBlock(tm) devi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i read this

  59. Heard on the radio this morning... by TheAmazingRando · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since it's a Delta rocket, they're going to have to stopover at the hub in Atlanta before continuing on to Mars...

    --
    The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that it has never tried to contact us. --
  60. Rocket Hub? by crispy1083 · · Score: 1

    Since this is a Delta rocket, is it going to go through Atlanta International? Seems like every Delta flight I've been on goes through there...