Slashdot Mirror


"Augmented Reality" For the Assembly Line

silkySlim writes "EETimes has a short article about a combination data goggles and earpiece device to replace big manuals and reduce training time for assembly line workers. 'In one possible scenario, a technician with data goggles bends over the engine block of a luxury car and removes the covering. He is receiving instructions through an ear piece telling him what to do next while his data goggles mark the screws and bolts on which he must next place his tool.' Apparently, it's already in use by several automotive companies. There's some additional papers also available."

183 comments

  1. Remindes me of the Matrix by spuke4000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tank, I need to know how to fix a Lexus IS300, now!!!

    --
    This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    1. Re:Remindes me of the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can start by removing those fugly riceboy tail lights.

  2. When things go wrong.... by Wuffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    THE GOGGLES! THEY DO NOTHING!

    1. Re:When things go wrong.... by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

      Funny, but true, when the system goes down the line will stop because no one will really know what they're doing.

      --

      ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

    2. Re:When things go wrong.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!"

    3. Re:When things go wrong.... by tigertigr · · Score: 1

      I think in this case it would be, "THE GOOGLES! THEY TELL NOTHING!"

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    4. Re:When things go wrong.... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the Stargate SG-1 episode that just aired, and it's scary how much of society is like that.

    5. Re:When things go wrong.... by Fishead · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the problem with this, it doesn't force the technician to understand the machine. At work we have piles of documents describing how to repair the assembly machines, but none of it is useful or makes any sense, it is just there to satisfy some ISO 9001 crud. It goes the same for training operators for short assembly run's, and prototyping. Yes, the operator then doesn't need to learn a task that isn't going to need to be done more then just once, but it assumes the author of the task did a good enough job that the operator doesn't need to understand what he/she is doing. I still feel that nothing replaces human intuition and education.

  3. Typical /. reader thought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if only these came with a bedroom module then maybe I'd know what to do when I found a girl in my bed.

    1. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by Brento · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now if only these came with a bedroom module then maybe I'd know what to do when I found a girl in my bed.

      Assuming that the module was done by computer programmers, I'm not so sure I'd want to follow the directions.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by Sevn · · Score: 0, Troll

      I dunno If I'm a typical slashdot reader but
      when it's my girlfriend I find in my bed I usually
      either:

      A) Fuck her

      B) Demand her give me the damn remote immediately
      so I can turn springer or whatever reality based
      shit she's watching off, then fuck her.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    3. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by Demodian · · Score: 0

      Probably a good thing that Al Lowe did not have this technology available when he designed Leisure Suit Larry, or a good portion of the male nerd population would have never left their caves or crawled out from under their rocks.

    4. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1

      Naw, it'd be done by technical writers, so you would do just fine... :)

      P.

    5. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      From the fortune program, ask and ye shall be enlightened, sort of.

      touch ; finger ; mount ; gasp ; yes ; umount ; sleep

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    6. Re:Typical /. reader thought. by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      i'd buy one right away just to know once and for all if thats the spot or not??

      point it out to me

  4. Technical writing by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I would be interested to see what in the way of technical writing and documentation goes into this sort of thing. It would force many technical writers to also focus on interface much more than they do now with standard Robohelp systems or other standard documentation.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Technical writing by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Talking of technical writing - what about grammar? "There's some additional papers also available." should be "There are some additional papers also available."

    2. Re:Technical writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An improvement, yes, but like anything, it can be improved upon further. The placement of the modifier "also" suggests multiple non-existent scenarios for "additional papers." I would suggest:

      "Also, there are some additional papers available."

      Hardly a memorable sentence, perhaps, but the meaning is now clear.

    3. Re:Technical writing by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      had to be said: "also" and "additional" are redundant. same with "there are" and "available", although this latter point is debatable depending on how much of a stickler you are w/ requiring a verb in the "sentence". that word is in quotes because sometimes it's just nice to revert to declarative style when the verb is "to be", (e.g., in feature lists) and ditch formal NP-VP requirements.

      but then again, i program computers and don't actually talk to anyone real (in english) so what do i know?

  5. augmenting reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm about to augment my reality with 1.5L of really cheap vodka.

    Cheers

    1. Re:augmenting reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but when you're finished, wouldn't the goggles be completely useless?

  6. How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Until they start implanting happy thoughts and images into the system to keep the workers productive. "You love your job."

    1. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download the music video for "Hell Bent", by Kenna. The video is kind of like that, its real freaky.

    2. Re:How long by GnarlyNome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Direct connection to the pleasure center of the brain (put it togeather right WHEEEEEE)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    3. Re:How long by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Nah, much easier to just brainwash them by using repeated messages all day. Pretty soon you have easily replaced, cheap robots...

    4. Re:How long by joepeg · · Score: 1
      You beat me to it. It's actually a short claymation by Mark Osborne titled "More."

      As I was gonna say:

      You mean like this: (high quality) (lower quality)?

      Courtesy of SciFi.com

      --

      ZEN is a prime number in base-36

    5. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unions are bad... Management can be trusted... Medical coverage is for whimps...

  7. Excellent by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cant what to see what happens when someone hacks into this system. I expect to see some cars reminiscent of my early childhood efforts with mecanno.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  8. Audio more efficient than text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This day has been a long time in coming. In addition to reading books, I now spend much of my time listening to books, websites, etc., and I am not hearing impaired.

    ATT's "NaturalVoices" technology (utilized by TextAloudMP3) is just exponentially better than the old Stephen Hawking voice, adds tone, inflection, etc., using grammatical clues, and makes even listening to Project Gutenberg's E-Texts of Charles Dickens Novels enjoyable.

    The big productivity boost in this technology is that after a little bit of practice, you can listen to an unabridged text file probably 20 times faster than reading, especially as you do not have to stop while driving, jogging, etc...

    I can't believe there hasn't been more industrial use of this technology.

    I've tried to get the PG folks to promote this more as it would make the "market" for their E-Books much larger, but that is pretty much the opposite of their very basic approach to technology. (i.e. not wanting to release their texts in anything other than a plain old ASCII format because they want their texts as widely accessible as possible.)

    1. Re:Audio more efficient than text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why are you modded as troll? Here is the explanation:

      1. You are trying to sound Insightful but have deliberately made meaningless statements. Such as saying that you now listen to many websites and books, and you are not hearing impaired. That makes no sense, only a visually-impaired person would be the typical user of speech accessibility functions.

      2. Voice is absolutely in no possible way 20 times faster than reading. Unless you have to sound out each word in your mind as you read, many people can read several pages per minute. And these aren't the "speedreaders" you hear about all the time. Try this little experiment: grab a novel and read it, silently. Then read the same novel aloud. Which will take longer?

      The reason text messaging and email is preferred above telephone conversations (for those who have internet access) is that it's actually much faster. You can read the contents of an email in 15 seconds, which would have taken the person five minutes to say.

    2. Re:Audio more efficient than text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well now...

      Although I appreciate your well-reasoned critique of my post, I haven't actually made "deliberately meaningless statements."

      You are correct that my noting I am not "hearing impaired" is misleading, but it wasn't intentional. What I meant to say was that I was not "visually impaired."

      As for the listening to audio being faster than reading... It really is when you get used to a high rate of speed...

      In any event, whether you agree with the speed issue or not, it would be hard to argue that being able to listen to a book is not more useful when driving or jogging...

      And, by the by, as far as I can tell, I've not been modded at all, having started and ended both at zero.

      "The reason text messaging and email is preferred above telephone conversations (for those who have internet access) is that it's actually much faster. You can read the contents of an email in 15 seconds, which would have taken the person five minutes to say."

      I would say the reason these mediums are more useful for small bits of information retrieval is that you get to avoid all that messy context, hello, goodbye, etc... But for taking in large quantities of unchanging data, audio for me.

      Anywho, I'm not here to get into a pissing match... If you want to expand your arsenal, fine. If you want to stick with one tool you know, fine. But you ought to at least know your options.

    3. Re:Audio more efficient than text. by yandros · · Score: 1

      Advanced users of speach-audio systems can reliably process speach must faster than the average `books on tape' voice; in fact, many visually impaired computer users regularly use text-to-speach systems running so fast that people unfamiliar with the TTS system cannot reliably keep up. It's really quite extraordinary.

      This is still MUCH slower than a trained, experienced reader can read written text. Human beings, at least at this stage in thier evolution, are simply much faster at accumulating `raw text' visually; it's a matter of the `hardware'.

      As an aside: there are suggestions that this may not have been true several hundred years ago. This is especially interesting to the current audience, which is mostly composed of people for whom the link between``see text'' and ``comprehend subject'' is so critical and exercised (i.e. people who stare at screens *all* the time).

      I suspect that your intuitions are coming from the simple fact that `raw text' is only a part of what most people encounter in the communication with their everyday lives. Human speach is incredibly nuanced and rich; this is a big trouble for computer TTS systems (and a big part of the reason that the aforementioned IBM system uses pre-recorded human speach samples). This is why most people find telephone calls so much more `personal', `useful', and `connective' than things like IM. Of course, actually being able to see *and* hear the person is even better...

  9. Finally... by ksheka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...When I was an undergraduate in CS at Columbia University (graduated in '93), the graphics guys were working on this.

    It's nice that it's finally coming down the pipeline 10 years later. Makes me wish I was still on the inside instead of looking at all this stuff as an outsider. :-(

    --
    alias uptime="echo '5:33pm up 22342352324 days, 6:28, 2124315623 users, load average: 2432.40, 12312.31, 123123.19'"
  10. Still Use people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In this day and age Automotive companies are still using people to do manufacturing?

    How barbaric.

  11. Psychological long-term ramifications by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Talk to most anyone who works on an assembly line and they will tell you that their job is as boring as hell. Some might say that they almost feel like a machine themselves.

    Contrast this with a labourer who builds furniture from scratch or a shoemaker and you find yourself in a different situation. While their actions are the same, their efforts have tangible results. If they have their own business selling what they've created the satisfaction runs deeper.

    How are goggles shining lights in your face saying "Unscrew this next" going to make you feel any closer to the work that you're doing? It just seems like another level of detachment to me.

    Why did the article discuss hardware problems but not social problems regarding the goggles?

    Mind you, from a Slashdot geek perspective, the goggles are a cool idea, but I don't feel envious of the people who are going to have to use these things on an assembly line.

    1. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another level of detatchment:

      How about using them to train you for your job for the first 3 weeks and then letting you do it on your own? These have multiple training applications.

      Also these people shouldn't even have assembly jobs. They should have been replaced by robots in the 80s and 90s. Damn Unions holding back progress.

    2. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by dollar70 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being a factory slave myself, I must concur. If you are left in the uneviable position of having to be the end user of such a device, it will have a particularly demoralizing effect on you. It's relentless micromanaging with no conscience what-so-ever. Don't like it? Fine. There's plenty of other people out there who are desperate enough to have a job so they can afford housing and soylent green rations. To them you're just an endless supply of renewable resources.

    3. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't do assembly line work. It was created to make fast, cheap, work. It wasn't meant to make you feel close to what you are doing.

      You get paid to be used as a machine. Please.

    4. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I couldn't stand working with a system like this constantly. But for training? It sounds pretty schweet.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0

      Mind you, from a Slashdot geek perspective, the goggles are a cool idea, but I don't feel envious of the people who are going to have to use these things on an assembly line.

      Geeks can "ooh" and "ahh" from a distance as they can't afford this sort of thing and their jobs, if they have one, wouldn't benefit from their use, I mean, a french fry machine doesn't need it.

    6. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 3, Funny
      To them you're just an endless supply of renewable resources.

      Peharps you've never noticed the term Human Resources?
      dollar70 does have a point though. somthing like this means that you can gather an even lower level of unskilled labor, expanding the resource pool.

      and on a creepier (funnier?) thought, suppose you could recieve updated instructions from your manager/ supervisor on the fly. Does anyone else have an image of somone sitting at their computer, clicking on a real-time layout of their production floor, selection someone wearing this gear, and moving them to another project? If that happens, would we have to say funny things if the click on us repeatedly?

      --
      Two Rules For Success:
      1) Never tell people everything you know.
    7. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it's going to be all that bad. These systems won't be used that extensively, simply because they will slow down skilled workers who already know what they're doing. If I've been working a station for two years, I already know which screws need to be tightened down, and which order, and how tight. Wearing goggles and having a voice in my ear and everything superimposed and highlighted is just going to slow me down. Probably slow me down dramatically.

      Taken strictly as a training tool, I like them. You don't have to take another skilled worker off the line to teach the new person. Thats always a big problem when you have a station or a position thats temporarily understaffed. Do you toss some untrained people in there, and watch production take an even bigger hit while your few remaining knowledgeable workers stop what they're doing and train the new people? Or do you just ride it out until your staffing is back up to full strength? Being able to put some new people in there and have them be at least semi-productive right away without needing any human training would be a good thing.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    8. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone have any questions about propane? Or propane accessories?

    9. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast, cheap work. Turn people into cheap machines, make them nothing more than mere human resources. Take away all the satisfaction from doing their job. Then wonder when they bring a machine gun and shoot their coworkers.
      It is not all only about money, dude.

    10. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by bucky0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, maybe your situation as a "factory slave" (as you put it) will cause you to maybe want to move up to a more enjoyable (and maybe profitable) job.

      Come back to me with some tripe about how your stuck where you are, and I'll give you a couple stories from my immigrant friends.

      --

      -Bucky
    11. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by dollar70 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Come back to me with some tripe about how your stuck where you are, and I'll give you a couple stories from my immigrant friends.

      Fine, I won't bore you with "some tripe" as you so eloquently trolled, but I didn't originally intend on growing up to work in a factory. Truth is, I took the job because it was what was available five years ago when I desperately needed to pay the bills. Since then I worked my way up high enough within the company to make more money than I could currently earn as an entry level applicant in the job of my dreams.

      It's tough in every occupational field in case you haven't noticed, and for the moment my current overseers have recognized my particular abilities as being more useful to them than an "Engrish" challenged immigrant.

      Being a factory worker is not a shameful occupation, but some of the smug PHB's out there delight in the concept of people toiling their lives away in miserable working conditions. "They get what they deserve, and they deserve whatever I say, because I'm the boss."

      I work, pay taxes, have a mortgage, and consume like any good American should. I don't blame my employer for my position. Deep down I am appreciative for the priveledge of having a job. And one day you'll appreciate me just as much when you come looking for a place on my goggle-run assembly line because your immigrant friends have found a way to replace you.

    12. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by bucky0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine, I won't bore you with "some tripe" as you so eloquently trolled

      Not an intentional troll, I'm just sick and tired of the "I can't do it" attitude that's been forming. So many people sit on their butts and complain about how they're stuck where they are, and then there's the people who work incredibly hard and take night classes to get the right knowledge(sp?).

      And one day you'll appreciate me just as much when you come looking for a place on my goggle-run assembly line because your immigrant friends have found a way to replace you.
      Joke's on you, I am one of those immigrant friends (originally from Brazil). My mom and dad each worked one or two jobs, did nightschool, and STILL made sure that at least one of them was at home to watch me. It was the hardest 15 odd years of their life, but it took them from the streets of Rio to the 'American dream'. They could've easily said, 'Woe is me, I'm stuck in brazil, with inflation rates reaching into the 100's, unemployment in the 30's', but they stopped whining and did something about it, which is what more people here should do.

      --

      -Bucky
    13. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
      doing. If I've been working a station for two years, I already know which screws need to be tightened down, and which order, and how tight.

      Not necessarily. The article mentioned wiring harnesses with thousands of cables that need to be routed. I don't care how long you've been doing it, you probably aren't going to learn how to do it, there's just too many things to remember. There are so many wires that even with color-coding you can't tell them all apart, much less where they all go.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    14. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Rivethead - he's an autoworker who basically cracks after years on the line. He also describes the various means of getting the job done while getting drunk/stoned/laid and trying to keep things interesting...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    15. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by hhinde · · Score: 1

      What about the other end of the equation? Becuase the human resource end doesn't require highly specialized labor, i.e. the UAW, then the costs of manufactured goods can come down.

    16. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by redbeard_ak · · Score: 1

      Twit.

      You can quote rags-to-riches stories all you like. It won't change that only so many will succeed and the rest fail. This is not simply due to the skills or efforts of those that don't succeed but circumstance and environment.

      The fact remains that if we want mass-produced devices (cars, etc.) someone will have to work those jobs (until complete automation). And if we want those toys what's wrong with making the jobs that make them livable?

      And if you haven't noticed, there are attempts at de-skilling going on in IT as well. Or don't you keep up with microsoft's product lines?

      --
      . This sig unintentionally left blank. I meant to put something here, but I'm busy.
    17. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by dollar70 · · Score: 1
      Not an intentional troll, I'm just sick and tired of the "I can't do it" attitude that's been forming.

      I have to agree with you, but I'd get technical and say "has formed". Many people have given up on the American dream, and it's sad. If it were just a small percent of the population, I wouldn't be concerned, but at the moment it looks like the vast majority are in this "holding" pattern brought about by massive doses of FUD.

      Joke's on you, I am one of those immigrant friends (originally from Brazil).

      Touché! But still even you can be replaced. "Goggle-visors" could keep lower paying jobs here, but that's about all you'll ever get out of that kind of technology.

    18. Re:Psychological long-term ramifications by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " If that happens, would we have to say funny things if the click on us repeatedly?"

      "Stop touching me!"

      "I...I...would burn down the building...."

      "MooooooOOOOOOOOOooooo"

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  12. Like Gandhi Said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technology that augments workers instead of replacing them, here's some progress that takes humans into account!

  13. His tool by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

    data goggles mark the screws and bolts on which he must next place his tool. Hehe

  14. Technical difficulties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious SNL sketch at your typical morning talk show when the teleprompter goes down. It quickly reverts into a Lord of the Flies type situation, with Will Farrell's host character ripping the head off (and drinking the blood) of David Allen Grier's weatherman character as a show of strength.

  15. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was pretty sure that the first commercial use of augmented reality would be p0rn related.

  16. Dupe story... by kaltkalt · · Score: 0

    I know I've heard about these augmented reality goggle thingamazoos before.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  17. no thanks. by August_zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure its definately cool, but its scary too. Imagine directions being constantly spoken into your ear as you perform your job.

    Human beings are not efficent organisms, neither in chemistry or psychology. You can't expect a human to act like a machine, something has got to give.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    1. Re:no thanks. by Brento · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure its definately cool, but its scary too. Imagine directions being constantly spoken into your ear as you perform your job.

      Ah, so augmented reality is like my mother-in-law riding in the back of my car? Yeah, that IS scary.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine directions being constantly spoken into your ear as you perform your job

      Well if it's a sexy womans voice telling me where to put my tool to get the job done as quickly and effectivly as possible, I'm pretty okay with that. But I get your point, that kinda stuff is only for the bedrooms right?

    3. Re:no thanks. by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Geez, I just read the other guy's "mother in law" comment and then I read yours. Thank you, I won't have a boner for years now.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    4. Re:no thanks. by August_zero · · Score: 1

      I know it's not basic, its a quote from a TV show and I took a few liberties with the syntax since the message is universal in all languages

      See it works on many levels.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  18. Not suitable for prolonged use by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Solutions are still far from perfect. The quality of data goggles and displays drew general criticism. "The data goggles aren't suitable for using for a whole day," said Lukasser of EADS. Bernd Lühr of Airbus Germany agreed. "The hardware problems in the goggles and trackers still need to be solved".

    I tried one of the AR displays a few months back. The main reason why I thought that particular model was unsuitable for prolonged use, was that the text and other information appeared at a different depth from the object I was observing. The AR information was displayed at a fixed "infinite" depth.This made it impossible to focus on both the text and object at the same time, requiring me to adjust my eye focus everytime I wanted to read something. This constant refocussing caused a good amount of discomfort.

    Adjusting the depth of the text to make sure it is exactly superimposed on the object that is being viewed is quite challenging, especially when the viewer moves his line of sight frequently.

    An alternate design that some people find easier to adjust to uses a display mounted on a single eye (with the RW showing up in a dimmed background). I haven't tried these, but supposedly they are easier to get used to.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Not suitable for prolonged use by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      The AR information was displayed at a fixed "infinite" depth.This made it impossible to focus on both the text and object at the same time, requiring me to adjust my eye focus everytime I wanted to read something.
      Couldn't they just overlay the text on a video feed from two small cameras mounted directly in front of the eyes and display the video mix to the user? Then depth becomes no problem because you're always focused on the screen, text and image will match.

      Of course, then system bulk, focus, resolution, and frame-rate come into play. Depth-preception wouldn't be that large an issue if two cameras where used...
      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  19. I need one for women. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Funny


    I look at a crowd of women and it gives me stats and percentage success rate with different "targets".

    I then talk to her and up pops up witty and appropate comments.

    I then start making out with her and then I get a Blue Screen of Death/Seg Fault.

    "Excuse babe, I need to Google something."

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:I need one for women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they call people like you 'gargoyles' in some famous cyberpunk book the title of which I've now forgotten...

    2. Re:I need one for women. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      So what you're saying is that the geeks shall eventually inherit the pussy?

      Leave it to technology to solve what simple hominid social skillz can't.

    3. Re:I need one for women. by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      The book you're looking for is Snow Crash. How could you forget it? Coolest. Book. Ever.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    4. Re:I need one for women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I don't know...if you're still wearing those goggles, your "percentage success rate" is going to be zero for any given woman anyway.

    5. Re:I need one for women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, I'll remind this forum of what posters before me wisely noted...

      You can't spell "GEEK" without an "EE".

      You can't spell "SEX" with an "EE".

      I oughta know. I am one. Both observations fit me perfectly.

  20. Hehe by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Your working habbits will adapt to service us.
    Resistance is feutile.

    Have a nice day.

    1. Re:Hehe by Lord+Kholdan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your working habbits will adapt to service us.
      Resistance is feutile.


      Spell checkking is futile.
      Preppare to surrender your dictonaries.

    2. Re:Hehe by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Those are not spelling errors!
      It's my ascii accent. Yes. That's it.

      Nothing to see here! Move along!

  21. My Amazing Psychic Powers Foresee Many Problems by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Informative

    The four biggest problems with extensive adoption of this idea are:

    1. Safety and Liability. I can just imagine a bug telling the new assembly line "cyber drone" to drill a hole 1 foot to the left when it meant one inch (shades of Nigel Tuefnel!), and the resulting explosion when he drills into the fuel tank. That, and the possibility of anyone who screws up telling his supervisor "Hey, that's what the Magic Smart Goggles told me to do!"

    2. Cost. Technical writers are comparatively cheap [and easy to lay off, he noted bitterly]. Programmers are expensive. If the new Mark 2 Framistan has holes in a different places, that's five minutes of work tops to put the new information in existing manuals, but a day to write the code, debug it, and test the magic googles to make sure they're acurately pointing out the new framistan holes rather than the old ones.

    3. Limited Applicability to Modern Manufacturing. A good portion of the most repetative assembly line jobs have already moved overseas. Many of the mechanical assembly jobs left don't require one worker doing the same thing 100 times, but doing 100 different things on a far more complex tool (i.e., the difference between assembling a toaster and assembling, say, an Ion Implanter). Optimizing "Enhanced Reality" for one task performed 100 times a day may be cost effective, but not for programming and training the system for hundreds of tasks.

    4. The Awesome Power of Human Stupidity. Everytime they make something idiot proof, nature has shown the amzing ability to come up with a better idiot.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:My Amazing Psychic Powers Foresee Many Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. Safety and Liability.

      Not that big of a problem if said 'drone' was (note tense) close to said fuel tank.

      > 2. Cost.

      Given the typical mindset of many developers I have worked with (obfisicate == job security), you could be right. Ultimately, it would depend on how it is implemented.

      > 3. Limited Applicability to Modern Manufacturing.

      No arguement on the premise, but what's to stop it from being shipped to where these jobs are. Then again, the system itself will probably be built overseas anyway, so its a win-win situation (to use management-speak).

      > 4. The Awesome Power of Human Stupidity.

      No question. Many, many years ago I worked on a CAM product. The Powers That Be proclaimed from on high the product was to be 'idiot-proof'. After a herculian effort, only idiots used the product. Followed immediately by the inevitable alianation of the existed user base, and lay-offs shortly thereafter, and finishing with ch. 11. The only 'idiot-proofing' the development staff forgot was management.....

    2. Re:My Amazing Psychic Powers Foresee Many Problems by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Some nitpicking:
      and the resulting explosion when he drills into the fuel tank
      As far as I know, cars aren't usually assembled with fuel in the gas tank. Even if they were, gasoline does not explode in liquid form, it merely burns--you would have to aerosolize it first in order to get an explosion.
      A good portion of the most repetative assembly line jobs have already moved overseas.
      So what? Can't the overseas people doing those repetetive tasks still use this technology?
      Everytime they make something idiot proof, nature has shown the amzing ability to come up with a better idiot.
      So? We should just stop trying to make things better, instead?

      I guess your amazing psychic powers weren't able to tell you that technology like this has already been in use for several years, so if you're so smart, why don't you invent a time machine and go back and post this when it might have been useful?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:My Amazing Psychic Powers Foresee Many Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Since when are vehicle fuel tanks full of gasoline while on the assembly line?
      3. No, you're wrong. Flat out wrong.
      4. Thanks for filling a role.

  22. People as peripherals by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I hope those guys have a strong union.

    Years ago, before multi-layer PC boards worked well, there was something called "semi-automated wire wrap". Production wire wrap involves wiring up big circuit boards with thousands of wires. Fully automated wire wrap machines were huge and expensive, and manual wire wrap tended to have too many errors. So "semi-automated wire wrap" was developed. Lights indicated the row and column where the wire was to be attached. The position of the hand-held wire wrap gun was monitored through a mechanical linkage, and if it was in the wrong place, pulling the trigger did nothing. Thus, when a wire was attached, it had to be in the right place.

    The equipment for this was far simpler than the fully automated machine, so, using low-wage workers, it became a common way of building boards. It totally de-skills the job. In an hour, anyone can learn it.

    1. Re:People as peripherals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I hope those guys have a strong union.

      It totally de-skills the job. In an hour, anyone can learn it.
      "

      Yeah, I hope they can protect $35/hr jobs that only take an hour to train someone to do.[/SARCASM]

      No wonder American cars have such low quality.
      J.D. POWER AND ASSOCIATES SURVEY: Japanese still dominant

    2. Re:People as peripherals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah, J. D. (how much does the award cost?) Power.

      Next, I suppose you'll start citing some of the car magazines.

    3. Re:People as peripherals by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Guess what domestic US car lover? Japanese cars ARE better. Thats why they sell for more, resell for more and retain their value longer. Its because they (Nissan, Toyota, Hondas) DONT BREAK DOWN EVERY 50 MILES!

      Thank you for your time Union Member.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  23. Dr.?? did your computer crash? by malia8888 · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the piece: In one possible scenario, a technician with data goggles bends over the engine block of a luxury car and removes the covering. He is receiving instructions through an ear piece telling him what to do next while his data goggles mark the screws and bolts on which he must next place his tool.'.

    It makes me wonder, when this technology is going to enter the field of medicine? I don't think I am ready for a physician with a Dell box strapped to his head..

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    1. Re:Dr.?? did your computer crash? by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It makes me wonder, when this technology is going to enter the field of medicine? I don't think I am ready for a physician with a Dell box strapped to his head..

      Personally, as long as the doctor doesn't use it as a crutch or replacement for knowledge, I would be fine with it. I can imagine having a readout of your blood pressure, heart rate, and other monitored bodily functions all right there, without needing to look away or call out for a reading.

      Working on a machine and working on a human body are quite different, where a mistake just a bit off could kill someone on the operating table, where a mistake on an assembly line means the machine may not work right.

      Granted, the malfunctioning machine may kill someone later when in use by the end user, but that's what QA is for.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    2. Re:Dr.?? did your computer crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have actually been using these for a while

      http://www.medarpa.de/en/index.html

      and google for medical "augmented reality" and you'll get a bunch more.

  24. DANGER WILL ROBINSON! DANGER!! by TWX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see a REALLY big problem with this approach, that will probably be difficult to properly instruct for, and that is inconsistencies, errors, and dangerous situations that could crop up, and the technician in question (though if they keep dumbing down the instruction, "technician" might no longer apply) might not be able to tell what is wrong or how severe it is.

    Remember, for problems, textbooks usually have fairly lengthy descriptions of types of failures and things to look for, with some representative pictures, but predominately with descriptions. Descriptions allow for describing a blanket set of bad circumstances without having to show one specific circumstance, so the technician could fairly easily connect the condition of a part or assembly to the verbage that was in the textbook. In picture instruction, if the picture of the type of error doesn't look close enough to the actual error, the technician might not realise the severity of the problem, because it was never covered under the training video. Rather than being taught the theory behind what is occuring, (s)he is being taught the specific, one case implementation.

    I'm not against training videos, but I believe strongly in training with more than just their use. Hands on training, as well as textbook training for theory offer a much more well-rounded way to learn, especially if the person being trained is going to be performing the same basic job for a long time on many different yet similar machines or models. Once the initial education has been bestowed, freshening of education for a newer model would be almost trivial.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  25. Vernor Vinge should be proud! by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's read the excellent "A Deepness In the Sky" will recognise these goggles as the "huds" in that book.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  26. Engage the improbabilty drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like anyone here would get a girl in his bed.

  27. Augmented Reality? by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    Am I nitpicking, or is the term "Augmented Reality" a bit of a misnomer. Reality is reality, what we augment is our perception of reality.

  28. beyond factories by Ateryx · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article is rather bland and trite in comparison to Scientific American's article that goes into a greater depth about the value of AR in the future (April 2002).

    The comments so far have been asking whether or not assembly workers actually need the AR. I would say many don't, however, as manufacturing becomes more and more automated, the actual jobs of the workers/repairmen on the line will probably increase in complexity leading to an excellent use of AR.

    EETimes doesn't even mention the possiblity of gaming with AR. Check out the sciam link to see more about gaming with AR.

    -Brad

    --
    "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
  29. Disclosure by AssFace · · Score: 1

    Back when I thought Michael Chritchton (I think I probably spelled both of those wrong, I'm retarded) was the greatest, I read all of his books.

    In Disclosure, they were testing out these goggles that do the same thing, but on airplanes.

    I'm not sure when that book was published, but I would guess prior to or during '95 because I don't think I read his stuff while I was in college and was too busy. I certainly haven't read anything of his since college.

    I guess then it was vaporware, and now it is for real. Hot damn.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:Disclosure by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Wrong book.

      These were actually used in Airframe, which came out a little later. Right author though.

    2. Re:Disclosure by AssFace · · Score: 1

      ahh, that would make more sense since I really don't recall anything about airplanes in Disclosure.

      Airframe was 1997, so while I was in college, or probably over the summer.

      that would at least explain my poor memory of it :)

      thanks

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  30. I Hate Wizards by twifkak · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I always hate it when Windows (yes, I know) forces me to go through a fucking "wizard" in order to do things. I like to learn and do things at my own pace and in my own order, and I *definitely* would hate to be a skilled technician being told through an earpiece how to use a screwdriver.

    (OK, I'll go RTFA now.)

    --
    I know you were joking, but I want my Karma, so I'm going to reiterate your post in a serious tone.
    1. Re:I Hate Wizards by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I hate witches even more. And a level 3 warlock that can block spells of enchantment due to some punk ass cloak that he got by caching in bags of coins just pisses me off.
      I don't have anything particularly against trolls, as long as my sword has the sheath of enlightenment maxed out after enough potions and one ups.

      I suppose I don't really know anything about that sort of thing, but I was trying to think of what the people that I saw in college sword fighting in the quad while wearing Elizabethan garb might have to say about your hatred for Wizards.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    2. Re:I Hate Wizards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In White Plume Mountain, I got the Black Razor, Wave, and Whelm.

      You fucking wizards don't scare me.

  31. Virtual Motel by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    cain't wait

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  32. Re:vernor vinge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vernor vinge short story fast times at fairmont high, is a very interesting story on consensual/augmented reality. Generally posetive but also berwilderingly alien also.

  33. ObFuturama quote (Re:Typical /. reader thought.) by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Funny
    Bender: "C'mon, it's just like making love! Y'know...Left, down...Rotate 62 degrees...Engage rotor..."
  34. The episode by hackwrench · · Score: 1
  35. Dating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That could make dating so much more reliable for us geeks. Just think what it would be like if you already knew that she shared the same interests, etc. You could probably have built in web access to these things too and check out her online profile. Oh wait... we're probably already sitting in front of our computers looking at her profile before we attempt dating anyway :-)

  36. "Augmented reality" has been around for.... by Homology · · Score: 2, Informative
    quite some time, beeing virtual or not.

    There are real health problems acossiated with this technology : A CAVE (yeah, a room filled with VERY big screens, often used by oil and automobile companies to display 3D graphics) will disturb your visual balance/depth, enough to impair your driving. In Norway you have restrictions on your driving after too much time inside a CAVE.

    A day in front of a lousy monitor gives you less of a headache than a day of using even expensive, high-quality googles.

    Technology like this is, like any other fancy GUI, has it's place, when used in an appropiate manner with well designed applications.

  37. Re:ObFuturama quote (Re:Typical /. reader thought. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

    You forgot the real punch line; in response, Amy says "I know how to make love, Bender!"

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  38. If the person who build cars needs this... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    then what chance does an independent auto mechanic have of keeping up? I think the manufacturers will use this technology to further control the service end of the business.

    1. Re:If the person who build cars needs this... by anubi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The days of independent mechanics are numbered. They have for quite some time now, since it has been apparently deemed acceptable for manufacturers to encode proprietary service codes in their systems, and persuade Congress that it is not an "antitrust" action for locking competitors out by doing so. Worse yet, this same Congress passed the DMCA which makes it actually illegal to try to figure out how they made it so it can be fixed.

      With a declining percentage of older open-architecture cars in the nation's fleet, we will see a declining percentage of independent repair businesses.

      I fix my own car.. which is the primary reason I have no interest in the new cars, which can't be fixed without infringing on the laws passed by those clowns under the styrofoam "vote hats" which parade around every few years, exhorting how it I elect them, they will "fight" for me.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    2. Re:If the person who build cars needs this... by fatcat1111 · · Score: 1

      The days of independent mechanics are numbered. They have for quite some time now, since it has been apparently deemed acceptable for manufacturers to encode proprietary service codes in their systems...

      It's not just service codes. I have a new Dodge and when the water pump failed (which on this car requires partially dismounting the engine) I was told by several good mechanics that I would have to take it to the dealership for repair as the engine mounts have a proprietary bolt/nut!

      Being part of a captive audience has me sour, but I won't be going back to an older car, primarily because I like the advanced safety and emmisions equipment on newer cars.

      --
      How Politicians Lie: http://www.factcheck.org/
  39. non productive by joq · · Score: 1


    This gives me the impression that prodution can actually slow down when workers use this. Think about it for a second. Workers on a production line become familiarized with undertaking tasks in a fashion that's helpful to themselves, they often get accustomed to doing things they way they want to which is sometimes faster than going through steps 1 - 5. By having to be told how to do things they have to stop and listen for one (which takes up time slows down production), and they have to deal with the impersonal feeling of now becoming robotic (if you will and I'll try to explain).

    I think we all agree with the statement technoolgy has made things better all around, however sometimes it's not in our best interest to have everything modernized with technology. For instance if you called a local police precint in New York you get the ever-so-rude press one for whatever: press two for whatever: and so forth. Get to what I'm saying? Maybe companies should instead opt to have a debriefer course of sorts with their employees to ensure they have an understanding of things instead of forcing them to hear some tech talk which (to me) is rather impersonal

    1. Re:non productive by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      I only skimmed through the real article, but I had the impression that these things were only meant for training or for use in unfamiliar situation (that bit about the mechanic and the car). They're supposed to be a replacement for manuals, and you don't use a manual all the time, do you?

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  40. dupe? by Paul+03244 · · Score: 1

    IIRC, Wired and/or /. had an article several years ago about Boeing using a simlilar system for jet liner assembly.

  41. Do you? by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember that music video called "hellbound" I believe. All the factory workers wear these happy goggles and work really hard but when their life is over and they take the glasses off they realized their life had been a total failure and completely meaninless. It was done in claymation with really depressing music. Does anyone else remember this?

    1. Re:Do you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you're referring to More.

  42. It's already being used in many places by mike_lynn · · Score: 1

    Boeing already uses this technology for wiring their planes during the assembly process. I see this mentioned on our local news just about every other month. It's very definitely a cool technology, but it looks like the automotive industry is (still) behind the times.

  43. People Robots by jonhuang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's... horrible. Efficent, economical and innovative. But horrible--you remove every bit of skill, creativity, and inititive ( I know, I know, not much to begin with ) and make people into meat robots. The real problem is, people will start expecting workers to *be* like robots. No training, no intro, just stick a pair of glasses on them and tell them what bolts to turn. If they slack a little, well the glasses will probably beep at them and alert payroll. You're naive if you don't believe that isn't one of the advertised benifits. I can see a day when people will be fired for putting in four screws in counter-clockwise when the labled instructions told them to do it clockwise.

    1. Re:People Robots by puckhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I can see a day when people will be fired for putting in four screws in counter-clockwise when the labled instructions told them to do it clockwise."

      I think you're being a bit optimistic.

      I've been around Union plants most of my life. From managements point of view, it's probably better to have the wheel fall of a car because it was screwed in wrong than put up with a strike for firing the guy who did it.

      --
      Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
    2. Re:People Robots by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      But horrible--you remove every bit of skill, creativity, and inititive

      Uhhh....you're not supposed to have any of those things if your assembling an engine. The skill creativitiy and inititive comes from the engineers and designers, not the factory worker. I'd really hate it if my car blew up because John C. Doe decided to be 'creative' with my timing belt (I'm not sure if that can blow a car up, but that's about the extent of my car lingo).

      I can see a day when people will be fired for putting in four screws in counter-clockwise when the labled instructions told them to do it clockwise.

      Considering screws have 'threads' on them, they don't fasten well if you rotate them the wrong direction(if you can get them in at all)

      You would change your tune however if someone screwing up assembling some equipment you use maimed you or a loved one. I know your following the "Protect the laborer!!!1!1!!" line but, safety and reliability are great plusses that could come out of this technology

      --

      -Bucky
    3. Re:People Robots by jonhuang · · Score: 1
      Considering screws have 'threads' on them, they don't fasten well if you rotate them the wrong direction(if you can get them in at all)

      Unclear example, sorry. I meant that there would be a certain order to put in the individual screws (screw A, screw B, screw C and then screw D..), rather than creative screwing technique.

      As for creativity.. I'm not talking about major modifications to the design (though there are times when workers come up with innovations to the process), but smaller optimizations. A left handed worker may do things different than a right handed one, and generally speaking, anyone who does the same thing 10,000 times will find some way to speed up the process.

    4. Re:People Robots by thynk · · Score: 1

      Considering screws have 'threads' on them, they don't fasten well if you rotate them the wrong direction(if you can get them in at all)

      Umm... They fasten fine if you 'rotate' them with a hammer.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    5. Re:People Robots by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      Parent says:As for creativity.. I'm not talking about major modifications to the design (though there are times when workers come up with innovations to the process), but smaller optimizations. A left handed worker may do things different than a right handed one, and generally speaking, anyone who does the same thing 10,000 times will find some way to speed up the process.

      Workers will still be able to fasten the bolts however they want to, overhand grip, underhand grip whatever, as long as the correct bolt is applied the correct torque at the correct time all is good. When working on stuff in my car there are many things which must be exactly right or things don't work right (Ex: When replacing a valve cover, follow the bolt pattern in the repair manual or be prepared to redo it after you learn that oil leaks out)

      --

      -Bucky
  44. Sounds a lot like... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The system described in 'Airframe' by Micheal Crighton (sp?) - which is well worth a read if you can find a copy.

    --
    Beep beep.
  45. Been there, done that... by aelred · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in '95, working for a DoD contractor, I saw a demo of some augmented reality gear being proposed for equipment troubleshooting and maintenance applications. The goggles were the same material used in head-up displays, coupled with an earpiece/microphone/camera in the headgear.

    The microphone provided input for possibly the best voice input setup I've ever seen to date, in that it actually recognized a user saying things like, "yeah, uh-huh" and similar grunt/groan acknowledgements. The goggles were linked to a rather cool pattern recognition system. A small status bar in the side of the display provided a couple of icons to let the user know they were on the right track, a smiley/mr. yuck set of icons provided a status as to system "lock" status (or not).

    The major downside to all this was the hardware in '95 to support all this was rather intensive. I recall 3-4 towers, plus a custom-built rather hefty cube-shaped box (no, not a next cube) that handled all the pattern-recognition processing and voice input. Oh, and the hefty wiring to the headgear.

    Other than that, pretty darn cool back in '95...

  46. Mixed Reality for Entertainment - at SIGGRAPH by mistermund · · Score: 1

    ::Blatant Plug Alert:::

    Prepping our booth now for SIGGRAPH in San Diego later this month. We will be presenting a pair of two player mixed reality games on the show floor. We're using Canon video see through HMD's to put the player in a Sci-Fi Time Portal shoot 'em up game as well as a mixed reality aquarium game where you play ball with dolphins.

    The idea is to get away from the "text in space" phenomenon that is present with most augmented or mixed reality systems to try and blend the real and the virtual seamlessly - meaning you can put some virtual character in the center of the room and interact, all the while seeing the real objects in the room as well as your buddies waiting on the sidelines. Interactive sets, lighting, and spatial audio wrap it off. Our placeholder website is available at http://www.mcl.ucf.edu/

    Should be fun for anyone coming to San Diego!

  47. Faster, Better, Cheaper by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I see this system as a way of implementing "supervision" at the micro-micro-management level, keeping tabs of employee productivity down to the microsecond.

    I could see where statistics, maintained by the system, would organize down to the very last microcent which employee was more productive than another. Given training will be no longer required, the employee can be ranked as easily as a solenoid valve, and replaced just as easily.

    This is great news for the businessman, who will undoubtedly lobby ( and win ) any changes to employment law to maximize his profit, just as many IP/Copyright holders are doing now.

    This is sad news indeed for the laborer. I guess his prime function in life is just to reproduce and make more laborers.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  48. A clever hack by jonhuang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Note that you could implement a clever hack job that would make all the employees fabricate say.. a giant lexus-branded steel penis. Since they've been reduced to following step by step operating codes, this taking over of worker directives would probably not be noticed until the very end. Likewise, corporate espionage could in the future consist of stealing the proper meme-program (obligatory ref: snow crash) to whatever missle tech is currently trendy. This is a consequence of further removing the worker from the means of production.

  49. How about this? by lpret · · Score: 1

    Do you mean something like this that was on slashdot a year ago?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  50. The real application for these... by AgTiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real application for these is an on-demand assembly line to replace a multitude of expensive single product lines that probably don't need to run all the time.

    Picture an automotive assembly line that has 300 assembly stations, each one of which gets the "next part" supplied by a chain driven conveyer bringing it to the station on a hook.

    Jane, who takes care of placing and tightening down the intake manifold on the engine block in front of her, no longer has to either think about what torque to use, what bolt pattern, or really, anything. Follow the instructions, tighten the bolts per the visual overlay pattern at the designated torque, and on to the next block coming down the line and intake manifold coming off the parts conveyer belt.

    The ultimate end of this is much like the Microsoft commercial where the guy in the showroom is picking whether he wants a black car or a red car, and the manufacturing plant is responding almost instantly. Now extend this to not beginning the production on a car until an order is placed, and it'll be ready that day for delivery to the customer's city.

    And yes, this reduces Jane to a non-thinking bio-machine for the assembly line. That's the really awful part of this process.

    Cast in the Name of Efficiency, Ye Not Cognizant.
    Big Ugh.

    1. Re:The real application for these... by bucky0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the computer is sophisticated enough too be able to visually recognise the bolts, determine their position to superimpose it on the display and knows how much torque to apply to it....why can't it do it itself?

      --

      -Bucky
  51. Don't forget the robot arm by blair1q · · Score: 1

    with the big claw on it to position his head exactly where it needs to be to align the images on the goggles with the hands-on media.

  52. Will this teach me... by darth_MALL · · Score: 0

    ...how to pick up girls?

  53. KeWL KeWL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ImaGIne iF we pUt ThIS GoGGlES oN TeH AndROyDS!!
    TeH woulD Be as ROBOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  54. you really sound... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    ...like you've got your shit together.
    congrats. :-)

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  55. Now I'm almost sure I saw something by supertsaar · · Score: 1

    very very similar in a _really_ old Wired article (paper, not web, can you dig it?) At least 4 years ago, I think it was an article about Boeing or some other large airplane manufacturer. Workers had goggles aiding them with the complex task of wiring the airplanes (guess they could see if they had to cut the red or the blue wire) Now if only I could find it back....

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  56. Aircraft manufacturers have done this for years by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boeing in St. Louis (military fighter division) uses goggle technology for several manufacturing processes. One example is when making wiring harnesses for aircraft. The wiring harnesses are very complex and can span over 100 feet. They used to have specific pattern boards for every different harness with pegs to support the wires and drawings to follow right on the boards. Now, they use a generic board with a grid of supports and they put a pair of goggles on that superimposes the wiring diagram on the board so that they can manufacture the harness of the day.

    I believe they have also applied this technology to the maintenance task to the degree that someone at a remote site can put on a pair of the goggles and be guided by visual highlighting superimposed over the aircraft parts to a task. They may also access schematics that do not superimpose and listen to guidance through the same networked device as they perform their task.

    1. Re:Aircraft manufacturers have done this for years by spun · · Score: 1

      My mom used to work for Boeing in Seattle, and I remember they had this back in the 80's, VR goggles that would show workers where to put hydraulic lines and wiring and such. Pretty cool, but ancient news. (I know, it's slashdot, what do I expect?)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  57. The Goggles by anubi · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you wanna check out what the goggles actually are, here's a link of one I am investigating for using in a similar effort on one of my contracting jobs...

    Micro Optical Corporation

    These use the heads-up overlay display technology.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  58. Uh, so what's the next step here, by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

    brain stem electrodes that control an employees muscles directly?

  59. Personal experience by sitturat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the car plant I work at (which will have to remain nameless) the workers learn how to build cars by trial and error.

    When a new model comes they start by producing only one a day. The cars that result from the first months of production are so bad that they have to be repaired by experts in a special hall, sometimes taking several days for each car.

    The first hundred or so cars are only used for presentations, road tests and crash tests anyway, so it's no big deal if they don't look perfect.

    Unfortunately, by the time the car goes into full production most of the workers still don't know what they are doing, and it takes a few hundred defect cars in a row before anyone decide to do anything about the problem.

    I guess a system like this would be ideal for the starting phase of production, to train up the workers. The only problem is that whoever sets up the system in the beginning would have to know how to build the car in the optimal way (including all variations). Usually nobody has this knowledge until after the fact.

    1. Re:Personal experience by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that you are building some brand of North American car. Honda does things quite differently, as I'm sure most Japanese and European manufacturers do.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    2. Re:Personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which car company do you work for?"

      "A major one."

  60. Why not mechanize assembly too? by KingPrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't understand the point of this. If you are having to program a goggle interface complex enough to recognize the screws from any nearby position and have it mark every last step, why not just put a robot arm on it instead of putting a person there? If you are mechaniziing the decision making and visual recognition, the only thing left - arm movement, is cake.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    1. Re:Why not mechanize assembly too? by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Space considerations maybe? Or maybe it's too difficult to design a robot arm that can 1) lift things 2) drill things 3)screw things in or out and 4) recognize if there's a problem outside of the scope of the visual recognition system.

      The computer may be providing cues to the operator, but the operator would still need to be a competent mechanic. This just gives him the ability to be a subject matter expert in real time. Think of it as yourself learning a new piece of network hardware or software app without having to RTFM because the manual is interactively streaming to you as you use the app. (And I don't mean clippy!)

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  61. Participatory Reality by MadCow-ard · · Score: 1

    Because we participate in our Reality through the very perception of it, Augmented reality is, unfortunatly, an accurate term.

    Without elaborating too much or giving too many examples: take a colored light and shine it at a wall. Hold up a opaque object and you will see the complimentory color of the light as the shadow. Yes, you might narrow it down to biochemistry in our optics, but if you look at this result purely empirically, it shows our perception of reality if far from REAL. We do not observe the vibrations know to our perceptions as color and light. We percieve a completely different "reality" from actual reality.

    Read a little Goethe to cover the light and color phenomena.

  62. I want AR for language learning by chriss · · Score: 1

    I want to go down a road, switch my wearable to learning Spanish and see la Iglesia pop up right in front of me when I pass a church. When shopping for peaches I get Las peras son muy apreciadas. (Please note that I do not speak Spanish, so my examples may suck. That's exactly why I want that system.)
    The machine would know my position via GPS or 3G mobile phone localization services. Starting 2005 I could enter a Wal Mart and my AR system would send a message to the RFID chips on the shelf:

    • AR to stuff: What the hell are you?
    • stuff to AR: I am a banana.
    • AR to me: Esto es un plátano!

    I would learn Spanish in no time even without the possibility to stay for some month in Spain, Mexico or South America.

  63. Now if only there was one for sex.... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    He is receiving instructions through an ear piece telling him what to do next ....

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  64. That's funny! by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought about "ldgp $gp, 0($27)" after reading about "assembly line"?

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:That's funny! by Tharn · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that is funny. I wonder if it might also be a forced grasp for karma. Do such things work (asks the karmaless n00b)?

  65. Also some similar research in aviation by mcleland · · Score: 1
    There has been some research on general aviation with respect to a wearable computer that leads you through a task. In this paper (disclaimer - blatent plug for colleagues) pilots do their pre-flight inspection of the plane with different types of assistance from the computer.

    The interesting result is that the subjects would follow the procedure the computer gave them very closely - so closely they would ignore steps in the standard procedure (that they are required to do) that the computer didn't tell them to do.

    I think we need to look much more carefully into these before people use them seriously.

    1. Re:Also some similar research in aviation by mcleland · · Score: 1

      Oops. Try this link instead.

  66. Michael Crichton kinda predicted this by DrSbaitso · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there were already working prototypes, it's not a unique idea, etc etc, but something very similar to this was described in the novel Airframe, published a few years back - a VR headset used to access the manual. It sounds even cooler now with the ability to delve through "virtual parts," but I remember thinking that was a neat idea at the time.

    That said, I still prefer printed manuals to the PDF files that come with most software from a store, so who knows how usable a virtual manual would be.

    --
    beware the jabberwock, my son! the jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
    1. Re:Michael Crichton kinda predicted this by astro-g · · Score: 1

      The version they used in the book was for use in maintanance, to make finding parts easier.
      (the electronics in a comercial airliner are a nightmare - anybody who's spen some time rewiriing a dashboard will get the general idea)

  67. Pft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toward Ultimate Reality

    Doc format, Linux boy...

  68. System Shock? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    The first thing that came to my mind when I read this was "System Shock".

    The second thing that came to my mind was "hey, that's pretty cool".

    The third thing that came to my mind was "how useful is that for assembly lines, though?".

    I guess if they can make them cheap enough it would be worth it, but I have to wonder if going full-robotics wouldn't make more sense in that case.

    What I would find this very useful, and very cool, for, is the kind of task that requires highly specialized expertise that is relatively scarce, particularly when (and where) it's needed.

    This could be very useful to help someone who's expertise is less-than-perfect, but happens to be the only person available, grasp the situation quickly and have a better chance at doing the job.

    Now, I'm not saying we're going to need this for alien infestations and supercomputers gone berserk.

    I'm talking things like medicine (particularly specialized surgery), industrial accidents, forensic investigations, terrorist crises (disarming explosives, not FPS wargames), etc.

    The kind of situations where flying an expert over would be very expensive, perhaps dangerous, and probably impossible, but a junior professional could be supervised (and in the process trained) to do the job.

    I would think that's the kind of situation where one would be thankful, rather than annoyed, for the magical googles labeling objects and transmitting instructions on the fly. Particularly if there is a feedback mechanism for someone on the other side to answer your questions and dynamically label the things you ask for.

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  69. This article has highlighted a geek problem... by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    when I started noticing how MANY times I saw the word "goggle" misspelled as "google"....

    Wake up people, there's more to life than the web...

    *grin*

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  70. take a queue from cameras... by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Informative
    an autofocus system would deal with that problem quite nicely. There are a couple of ways AF works on cameras, one is to evaluate the image itself looking for constrasting lines and measuring the gradient. Too much gradient means a blur, so it adjusts until sharpened.

    The other method is active focus which bounces an infrared beam off the object and measures the distance.

    Neither is perfect, but in a controlled manufacturing setting it would be easy to create 'focus points' on objects which would allow the system to focus the right distance. Heck, with that you could probably build the system to focus specifically on the correct part, further eliminating confusion.

    --

    -

    1. Re:take a queue from cameras... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      you could probably build the system to focus specifically on the correct part, further eliminating confusion.

      Take that a step further, scale and rotate the text so it appears it's actually painted on the object in question. If you turn your head, the text turns too so the illusion that the object actually has the text on it is complete. Wonder how hard that would be.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:take a queue from cameras... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      I think the difficulty the parent mentioned was due to the fact that people look all over the place. I have a monitor 2 feet or so in front of me, but if I shift my eyes some, I can see the horizon which is real far away. To properly focus a display to line up with that would require a computer to track the eye, triangulate what it's looking at, then adjust the focus accordingly, which I assume is no small feat.

      --

      -Bucky
    3. Re:take a queue from cameras... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The real difficulty I see is that we'd prefer that text/pic for each different object should be at the same focal distance as the object it's linked to.

      However for technical reasons it's much easier to put the text all at one focal distance.

      To solve this could involve increasing complexity and cost of the devices in order to simultaneously display graphics/text at different focal distances, or to only show text/graphics for objects at the focal distance you are looking at (phase in/out effect), plus some other stuff that is to be shown at all times, or put stuff at a manually adjustable focal distance.

      --
  71. Screw assembly lines.... by sllim · · Score: 1

    Imagine how a device like this would improve the experience of loosing your virginity.

  72. Guns, anyone? by 2toise · · Score: 1

    In my mind the military have been working on these kinds of things, not for slavish micromanagement, but to provide a kind of hud for folks to hook into information sources like airbourne surveilance, location of friendlies etc. You could certainly use it for more skilled tasks to make info available.

  73. Click here to shoot the President by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Next thing you know, they'll have goggles that make it easier for people to assasinate someone.

    --
    This is my sig.
  74. first comes the abuse, then the use by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    I'll bet you see a whole new version of the time and motion studies with these things. It'll cause worker unrest and eventually strikes until a more reasonable compromise is reached.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  75. Boeing is looking at this too... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    In fact, they were just starting to develop the specs before I was laid off this last January. Their ultimate goal was to develop a wearable computer, with goggles and earpiece just as described in the story, that could be used by any A&P mechanic, not just the assembly line folk.

    I think someone even had an idea that the system would be smart enough to where an inspector could look at, say, part of a turbofan engine and, if said engine was missing a fix mandated by a maintenance bulletin, would notice this and pop up an alert, pointing out what needed to be done.

    The applications for something like this are limited only by imagination, the available CPU power, and the network bandwidth.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  76. Here's another clever idea for training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The clever idea would be to use the free-space medium for direct pin-point-accurate stimulation and activity-imaging of the aural and visual portions of the brain, by phased-array high-frequency sources, both ultrasonic and electromagnetic. People in close proximity to the lucky trainee won't even be able to detect it. Having the trainee relatively immobile in front of a computer presents a nearly ideal training setup. The phased array could even be placed outside the trainee's room.

  77. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Join GNAA Today! GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which
    gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over america and abroad for one common goal -
    being GAY NIGGERS.

    Are you GAY?
    Are you a NIGGER?
    Are you a GAY NIGGER?

    If you answered "Yes" to any of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
    Join GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.
    .________________________________________________.
    | ______________________________________._a,____ |
    | _______a_._______a_______aj#0s_____aWY!400.___ |
    | __ad#7!!*P____a.d#0a____#!-_#0i___.#!__W#0#___ |
    | _j#'_.00#,___4#dP_"#,__j#,__0#Wi___*00P!_"#L,_ |
    | _"#ga#9!01___"#01__40,_"4Lj#!_4#g_________"01_ |
    | ________"#,___*@`__-N#____`___-!^_____________ |
    | _________#1__________?________________________ |
    | _________j1___________________________________ |
    | ____a,___jk_GAY_NIGGER_ASSOCIATION_OF_AMERICA_ |
    | ____!4yaa#l___________________________________ |
    | ______-"!^____________________________________ |
    ` _______________________________________________'

  78. People are robots by mattypants · · Score: 1


    It strikes me that the complaint that it just turns people into robots only highlights that the people that are replaced by robots are actually only doing jobs that can be replaced by robots... I think this means that those jobs should defininately be done with robots wherever possible to avoid the boring, repetitive strain on people (ie: we shouldn't allow people to do jobs that robots can do because people aren't robots and shouldn't be treated as such). I think I made sense there... not sure!

    That thought came about because this system can only be applied in circumstances where a robot is also suitable - quite frankly, if a vison and and help system knows what to do - it can drive a robot.

  79. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The operator drops a heavy tool and the display reads...

    Warning - jump left!
    No, the other left!
    Too late... clutch right foot with hands, hop on left foot.
    Curse out loud .

  80. Not new to Augmented Reality by shadoelord · · Score: 1

    This is what Augmented Reality was originaly designed for. A boeing employee came up with the idea while working on engines.

    Other ideas have been:
    1) Constuction - Allowing building inspectors / contractors to see the layout of the building, already ran wire through the walls (to help aid in routing), to see city pipes/underground powerlines before digging
    2) Self guided tours - Give directions, brief text, show how/where buildings once stood, draw "ghost" like people in clothing of a certain time period
    3) Repair - As mentioned, repair of a car, computer, laser printer. Animated lined images show you have a certain "do-hickey" fits in a "thing-a-majig"

    --
    this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
  81. Fiction inspires life? by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1
    Micheal Chrichton's
    • Airfraime
    , to be specific. It's how the protagonist discovers the auxiliary data-recorder that lets her solve the mystery. And this is copyright 1996.
    --
    What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
  82. Cool applications for this technology by tjstork · · Score: 1

    This might well be the next big thing.

    Goggles for gardening. Shows you how deep to cut hole, which branches to prune.

    Goggles for repairing things. Car broke down, need to fix breaks? With the goggles you'll be able to do it yourself, no problem.

    Goggles for battlefield medicine. Quick, your buddy's arm just got blown off. He's gonna die in minutes and the medics are dead. Put on goggles and at least give it a shot.

    Handwriting recognition would have to be good. So you could do stuff have the goggles point out mistakes as you are doing your calculus homework.

    --
    This is my sig.
  83. I do not really care about this so called �Karma.� by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 1

    Yes, but that is funny. I wonder if it might also be a forced grasp for karma. Do such things work (asks the karmaless n00b)?

    Well, actually, to be honest, I am not quite sure what does "n00b" mean (in fact, I am not very fluent in all of this "leat" and "cool" lingo) but I can assure you that no matter what some people might have told you about some of my posts (especially about this one in particular) I, as a matter of fact, do not really care much about this so called "Karma" thing.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
  84. Boeing 777 & automotive by chiph · · Score: 1

    Wired magazine several years ago had an article about some AR goggles in use at Boeing. Despite the idea that all 777's are identical, in fact they're customized for the airline they're destined for. The goggles were worn by workers who were making up wiring harnesses. They were time-savers in that they told the worker what length, color & gauge wire to run from connector "A" to connector "B" without the worker having to consult a paper wiring list. With several miles of wire in the typical jet, it reduced the number of errors that were made.

    I think this is probably the correct type of work for AR goggles because it involves a specialized task that varies just enough to make it error-prone by us poor humans. AR goggles would be unsuited for something like an engine assembly line, as the engines are identical, or only have 2 or 3 variations at most, and most motions are repetitive (something which robots are good at and people aren't, but I won't go into that).

    AR goggles might be useful in automotive during final assembly for luxury cars, where each car is customized for the buyer (grey leather and burl walnut, vs. black leather and carbon-fiber trim). Both BMW and Mercedes have programs where you can order a car interior *exactly* the way you want it (and you'll pay for it, too!) The cost of correcting a mistake for a custom-built car might cover the purchase price of a set of goggles.

    Chip H.

  85. A.I. by luisdlc · · Score: 1

    WOW! I didn't even know that those robots of THOSE assembly lines needed MANUALS in the first place! Truly advanced A.I. I guess.

  86. Re:I do not really care about this so called �Karm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fair enough.

  87. Re: Which car company by snazzed · · Score: 1

    That is EXACTLY what I was thinking of when I read the parent post. That quote and

    "Take the average price of settlement and call that X..."

    Snazzed