Security Update Fixes the Screen Effects Hole
jellomizer writes "Here is is. Available from Software Update. 'Security Update 2003-07-14 addresses a potential vulnerability when a password is required upon waking from the Screen Effects feature, which could allow an unauthorized user access to the desktop of the logged in user.'
Now we can use our screen savers with the warm and fuzzy secure feeling."
i just hope that one day updates won't require a restart.
About them Apple Switchers,
ain't they well informed
goin' to and frow,
switchn' they platform.
Them banjo pickin' Apple Switchers,
see how much they spent?
They switch to stop blue screens of death
or just to Think Different.
Look at all those Apple Switchers,
hey they even chicks!
Some just switch to make a point,
some just for the kicks.
How to be an Apple Switcher,
if you want to know?
Take a trip to Apple's store
and pony up the dough.
A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
is is? I cannot seem to find "is". I feel so lost!
Sure can tell its Monday afternoon - editors are still recovering from the weekend
Could pudge or jellomizer please post a hyperlink? Thanks!
It's unclear from the docs whether this fixes just the problem of the screensaver dumping you back into a session without the password, or whether this addresses the buffer overflow that could cause other applications to crash, including the login window.
Anybody have any idea what files this updates and what version it updates those files to?
I know that you can gain access to my machine by rebooting and changing the root password. I know that you can get around the open-firmware protection. I know that a screen saver doesn't protect my hard drive from someone opening my machine and taking it... but I am still very thankful for this update. Why? Because I encrypt my entire home directory. (Via the method I mentioned here a while ago). So, the "lock screen" option is very important to me -- If you reboot my machine, my home directory is once again encrypted. So the Screen Saver password does have it's place.
After updating, I tried to crash a few other apps using the "leave an object on the keyboard" method, and the text boxes simply stopped accepting input after a certain amount of time.
Apple's page for the update, if you prefer to download manually.
I don't notice a performance hit while using the files in my home directory (I don't keep MP3s there however). You can monitor the amount of CPU that is being used decrypting files by checking the CPU usage of the 'hdid' process in top or the CPU monitor. But I encrypt my home directory (as you suggested) to protect my Library, financial records, my code, and the files for my business which I use all the time. My desktop (my download folder) is encrypted and I don't notice a performance hit while downloading. (I'm running a Dual 500 MHz machine, should you care)
Can you prove conclusively that he hand-assembled it?
/etc/hostconfig, or I can go into System Preferences and do it. There are all sorts of other examples, but you're not worth any more of my time.
Didn't think so, asshole. Try again.
The task that hdparm performs can be performed and still have an interface that isn't nearly that cryptic. The interface can be optional, for those users who would prefer to impress their fellow virgins at their mastery of arcane commands.
The concept that the Linux crowd seems to have missed (but that Apple has embraced) is that you can have two ways of doing things:
1) The Easy Way.
2) The Hard Way.
The two need not be mutually exclusive.
If I want to change my machine's hostname, I can do it either in
Until the Linux Crowd figures this (and many other usability concepts) out, Linux will remain a toy.
I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you trolling losers? I've been sitting here at my cubicle reading slashdot for about 20 minutes now and again some pathetic AC has posted another variation on the parent troll. A pathetic AC. At home, where I also read slashdot, which by all standards should be the same as slashdot at work, the same troll will still appear in about 20 minutes. If that.
In addition, during reading the parent troll, I will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt.
I won't bore you with the laundry list of other insults that I've thought of while reading variations on the parent troll, but it is suffice to say there have been many. I don't get how someone can claim to get satisfaction from posting the same troll over and over again, whether it be changed to read Mac Classic, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, OGG, Windows, IE, PPC, or anything else.
Troll addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to post variations of the same boring old troll.
I dont really see this as that much of a problem.
So instead you power cycle the laptop, hold down S durring boot to enter single user mode.
At this point you do technically have root, although without a GUI.
Change target accounts password, reboot, login.
If you have a password set in openfirmware to prevent single user mode boots, I have to zap the pram 3 times and the password is gone.
Granted this is a whole lot harder than breaking the screen saver, but still, any computer someone can get physical access to is not secure under any conditions.
There is also a fresh iDVD software update today as well. Rumored to fix the "I don' wanna!!!" message...something about multiplexing :)
No restart needed!!
The download file is named: "SecurityUpd2003-07-14.dmg
Its SHA-1 digest is: 210f4819b8559b590632cd62b4055a437b9a0267
Apple really needs to add a "Restart Later" option to SU. I can't count the number of time it's been incredibly inconvenient to restart so I've had to force quit SU.
This is a [lame] local user access hack/exploit. No big deal. Why fix it? They should ignore the problem. If enough people complain then it's not a bug, it's a _feature_. Has the moon gone red?
Oh, wait, I stopped using Microsoft products. Sorry.
Read my comment above. One thing (amongst others) that rebooting does is unmount any encrypted disks, requiring the user to enter the password again to remount them. Cracking my root password won't gain you access to the encrypted disks I had open before you rebooted my machine.
I don't know if it's related, but all the printers have disappeared from print center. When I tried to add it back, I got an error. Ideas?
The updated Security.framework will be loaded by ScreenSaverEngine.app the next time it runs - in other words, the next time the screen saver activates.
Have you tried it? I have. No reboot, and no more crashing screen saver.
Anything that is already running retains the old version of Security.framework until it's started again, but ScreenSaverEngine.app and loginwindow are both immune. There may be other (unrealized? unreported?) exploits that the update fixes that require a logout or reboot, but to fix the simple screen saver exploit, no such silliness is required.
Mark
How will FileVault effect your current encryption method? Will you switch to use FileVault when Panther comes out? What is your opinion of FV? And this is a great idea, you should get credit since Apple implemented this as well.