Slashdot Mirror


iPhoto 2: The Missing Manual

honestpuck writes "The Missing Manual series has been around for quite some time, but I have never felt the need to buy one until I started doing some serious work with iPhoto. iPhoto 2: The Missing Manual was a good volume to assist." Read on for the rest of honestpuck's review. iPhoto 2: The Missing Manual author David Pogue, Derrick Story, Joseph Schorr pages 336 publisher O'Reilly/Pogue Press rating 8 reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0596005067 summary An good guide to iPhoto2 for beginner to intermediate users

One of the things I like about Apple's iApps is that they hide a great deal of complexity behind a simple interface; they do indeed make the complex simple. The drawback to this is that I often find myself ignoring the more powerful aspects of the application and never using it to its full. It was here that the Missing Manual came to my help.

The target audience for this book would probably be a little less technical than myself or the average Slashdot reader, however when I find myself in a field I don't understand well I don't mind a little stuff for the absolute newbie. This book has an entire first section that deals with photography and digital photography in particular that may be a total repeat for some, I found it a welcome reminder of how to get a good photograph along with some extremely useful hints about the new technology and choosing a camera. It covers such topics as composition and lighting for a host of different situations such as landscapes, night, portraits, children and sports.

It then goes on to a section of similar size on the basics that covers getting the photos from your camera to the Mac, organising the photos using albums and keywords and then editing your shots.

A third section covers the various ways of publishing and showing your photos such as printing, CD, and web pages, and a final section with some tricks and tips on things like managing your libraries. There are two appendices: one very useful troubleshooting guide, and a menu-by-menu look at iPhoto 2.

I particularly appreciated the thorough treatment of how to get the most out of iPhoto when printing photo books and creating web pages in the third section; it was here that I really discovered how little I knew from just 'playing' with the application. The book is peppered with useful information and tips that take you beyond the level that most of us discovered when we ran and used the program. The authors have also provided some marvelous explanations of what is going on, the "why" as well as the "what."

The book is well written with a readable, light, almost witty style that somehow deceives the reader as to the depth of the material being covered. It is only when I reflected back on how much the book taught me that I realised how well it had done the job.

O'Reilly have their usual web page for the book with a sample chapter, Table of Contents and Index. Pogue Press have a neat idea - they have a page that features all the software mentioned in the book. A neat idea that I liked a lot.

In conclusion, I would recommend this book to everyone who is serious about digital photography on their Mac. If you have used iPhoto for a long time you may think the book a waste, but I'd be surprised if even long-time users didn't get their money's worth out of this book. I much preferred the style of this volume to IDG's iPhoto 2 for Dummies , the only other real competitor for this volume was iPhoto 2 for Mac OS X: A Visual Quickstart Guide , and that is a shorter volume with less depth and less advice for photography and nothing on the camera technology, though I think Engst's writing seems a bit clearer at times.

I wouldn't buy a "Missing Manual" for every iApp or the operating system, but if you take the slogan for the series seriously, "The book that should have been in the box" (for the box is entirely devoid of books), I think they are a marvelous help for becoming a true 'power user.'

You can purchase iPhoto2: The Missing Manual from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

107 comments

  1. cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      has anyone noticed the new trend - shall we call it amazon whoring ?

    2. Re:cheaper by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is getting off-topic, but if you want to compare prices, then go to http://www.allbookstores.com/search_advanced.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then you wouldn't be giving a commission to either slashdot (if you click on bn) or the bookpool or amazon guys. boo hoo for them.

    4. Re:cheaper by justMichael · · Score: 1

      Great resource. Thanks.

      I wasn't only suggesting Bookpool because of price. I would rather deal with a small company if given the choice. I'm not really fond of Amazon or Buy.com. I have had good experiences with Bookpool.

      BTW: Bookpool was still cheaper than everybody on the list from allbookstores.com.

  2. Options by jmays · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read iPhoto2 Fast & Easy and thought it was a pretty good reference. Basic but worthwhile.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  3. Not necessary. by momerath2003 · · Score: 5, Informative

    All you need to become a power user for an iApp is a bit of spare time, experimentation, and perhaps the help of Mac OS X Hints. You really shouldn't need a book, especially for a program as simple as iPhoto.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    1. Re:Not necessary. by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's just what they want you to think. When Windows 95 shipped, the thinking at the time (and still is today) was that consumers would perceive software to be easy to use if it had no "need" of a manual. It sucks having to plop down 50 bucks for a book telling me how to do some of the more intermediate tasks, let alone the advanced ones.

      Apple and Microsoft _should_ be shipping manuals with their products, hands down. Sure I could spend my time playing and figure out a way to do things and yes, the net is a great resource, but I'd rather have a vendor-provided method for training and get my work done so I can play with my Nintendo.

    2. Re:Not necessary. by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's just what they want you to think. When Windows 95 shipped, the thinking at the time (and still is today) was that consumers would perceive software to be easy to use if it had no "need" of a manual.

      Dude, there is a monstrous difference between Windows 95 and iPhoto. Or even between an operating system and a consumer application.

      iPhoto is a very simple, mostly intuitive program whose features can be described / summarized in only a few pages of paper.

      I can't say the same for Windows 95.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  4. Why a manual by agent+dero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it would have been nice to have recieved something of this nature when I bought my new macintosh. Something to give me a little peek into the power of the iApps.

    I think that would help Apple out a lot, to have more in-depth PDFs on their iApps, like iMovie, iDVD, and iPhoto

    I think that would help more and more normal mac users become power mac users (get it! powermac ;-))

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:Why a manual by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmmm...Hence the name The Missing Manual?

    2. Re:Why a manual by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple is afraid of alienating third-party documentation publishers the same way they have alienated third-party software vendors by putting out applications which don't just compete but crush whatever is out there. If they wrote their own documentation, then that would kill an even larger industry!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  5. iPhoto Is Nice... by Goo.cc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but it simply is more than I need. When I download pictures off my camera, I use EXIF-Renamer to rename the photos based on the date and time they were taken. I use JView to view them and if I want to order hard copies, I use Ofoto via Safari. Should I need to manipulate the images, I have GraphicConverter.

    The best thing about this is they there are no installers to run; they are "drag and drop" installed applications. But I can also understand why people like iPhoto.

    1. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by rootofevil · · Score: 3, Funny

      care to explain why youd rather use 8715309821375981 different programs when one will suffice?

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    2. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because he was trolling, and you bit.

    3. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by mblase · · Score: 3, Informative

      What you didn't mention, I notice, is any tool to organize your images. Presumably you organize them yourself, which is great, but the charm of iPhoto is that it keeps them organized by date (and by virtual "film roll") for you. Manipulation is built in, and it always keeps the original, which GraphicConverter (the only app you mentioned which isn't free, btw) doesn't automatically do. Plus it will automatically export images into files, webpages or QuickTime movies, which saves you a lot of trouble configuring batch edits in GC.

      If that's more than you need, then great, although you're not missing anything by replacing a free application with shareware.

    4. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 generic program great at nothing, or a smattering of highly focused apps that do one thing, and do it well?

      Of course, if convenience did not equal dumbed down, this wouldn't be a problem.

      iPhoto is good for one thing only; getting pictures off a digital camera. It won't even grab the movies that are on a lot of newer cameras... how lame is that? And the directory structure is horrid as well.

      *shudder*

    5. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a monolithic app has it's drawbacks, but Apple has to offer a one-stop app for what is probably their median user group. Digital photography use among most computer users is exploding, and it would be wrong for Apple not to provide a slick single interface aimed directly at these users.

      The UNIX guy in me agrees with the notion that large apps can be a pain, in principle. Many small apps that do one or two things extremely well can often be more satisfying to use than a single monolithic app that is a pain to navigate, offers features you don't need and hides the ones you do.

      Well, I would have agreed that iPhoto is perhaps overkill until I got a digital camera and hooked it up to my G4. Having an app that catalogs and organizes my photos, like iTunes (or any other digital music app) was so useful, I never looked back. The fact that it has facilities for smart backup to DVD, and other features I haven't even explored is just gravy. The UI fills me with a warm fuzzy, as well.

      I'd have to say that iPhoto is one of those rare apps that manages to give most of us just about what we need, but no more. Between iPhoto and Photoshop Elements, this amateur photog (and recent convert from film cameras for holiday snaps and the like) has all he needs.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    6. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by elmegil · · Score: 3, Informative
      And the directory structure is horrid as well.

      As opposed to a single directory full of P07310003.jpg files, as would be the case for the 80% of users who don't know how to automatically script downloading and renaming of the photos from the camera? Personally, while I wouldn't want to navigate the directory structure manually very often, the naming conventions are clear and for the target audience mostly transparent anyway.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      I would rather use a chain of smaller programs that can be individually replaced if need be. Depending on a single monolithic program can have problems (and advantages).

    8. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      "As opposed to a single directory full of P07310003.jpg files, as would be the case for the 80% of users who don't know how to automatically script downloading and renaming of the photos from the camera?"

      That's why EXIF-Renamer is such a nice program. It has selectable and customizable renaming settings. I have Image Capture call it while importing photos.

    9. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      "If that's more than you need, then great, although you're not missing anything by replacing a free application with shareware."

      All the apps I use are freeware, except for GraphicConverter, which I already had when I finally got my camera. If I wanted to, I could replace it with Gimp.

      As for organizing, it keep them in a single directory with several sub-directories. It's easy.

    10. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      And I can imagine with a name like "EXIF-Renamer" it's on the tip of the tongue of every technically illiterate mac user in the world!

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    11. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the HELL moderated this as "funny"?

      Someone who's going to get cockslapped in metamod.

    12. Re:iPhoto Is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEEEEEEE-haw!!! Slap that cock, Georgie!

  6. iPhoto needs some tweaks... by terraformer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I agree with the reviewer, iPhoto is such a simple program, why would someone on /. need a dummies book?
    Anyhnow, iPhoto needs two things badly
    • The ability to have hierarchical (nested) libraries
    • The ability to use the FS layout of files to create the above hierarchical libraries when importing
    I have a massive amounts of images (no, not porn) that I have organized painstakingly using folders and importing them into iPhoto lost all of that organization. Now I have to manually create libraries and I cannot nest them.
    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    1. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I have a massive amounts of images (no, not porn)

      I have massive amounts of images that aren't p0rn either, they're "art".

    2. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhoto is a 'simple' program, unless you've had the experience of using the analogous Microsoft photo-organizing software. I've used computers for, oh, 40 years or so, but never managed to get the 'simple' MS program to do the same thing twice.

    3. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by terraformer · · Score: 4, Funny
      , but never managed to get the 'simple' MS program to do the same thing twice.

      That's OK, even the more complicated MS programs never do the same thing twice...

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    4. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's funny, when I imported my massive collection of photos, each roll was automatically named with the parent folder's name, and organized automatically.

      Sure, they weren't hierarchically organized, but whatever.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by terraformer · · Score: 1

      Your photos had the right meta data on them (ie; roll info from whoever digitized your film) but most of mine are personal scans and personal art. None of the meta data existed except for digital images that I took and imported using Canon's software and not iPhoto.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    6. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by -tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in the same position.. I have a ton of images that I have organized using a combination of automated tools and manual structuring. iPhoto doesn't handle importing of these very well.

      I would like it to import all of these images, use their directory names as Album names, and leave the images alone. In the hierarchical directory structure, they support easy web viewing using my image management tools (or any of the dozens of free tools out there).

      The best app I have found for this is "Adobe Photo Album". It imports images very easily, and has all kinds of options for organizing / searching the images. One particularly cool feature is the timeline, which uses the EXIF image date in the JPEG to organize the images by when they were taken. Select the month you want (or range of time) in the timeline bar at the top, and it selects the images from that time. Very handy.

    7. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by nomso · · Score: 1

      You might want to inform Apple of your needs.
      Which, btw, are things I would want too.

      Who knows, it might be a feature in the future.

      --
      there is no spoon
    8. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      My photos were dragged off of a CF reader into folders by me. Those folders were then named according to their content. When iPhoto imported everything, it used those folder names to name the rolls.

      You realize I'm not talking about albums, right? Rolls. Make sure iPhoto is showing you everything organized by roll.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by gsfprez · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well maybe not nesting, but this is the next best thing...

      a great piece of freeware called iPhotoBuddy allows you to create and select multiple photo libraries. I don't even have iPhoto in my dock any more because of this software. I keep 4 different libraries and about 3000ish photos (i have a digital camera and a puppy, bite me).

      You simply choose which library you want to run - and it launches iPhoto with the corresponding library. My previously insanely slow library is now quick and easy, and iPhoto is a wonderful tool to use again, like when it first came out and I only had 500 pictures.

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    10. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by RestiffBard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's unfair to label the missing manuals as "dummies" books. My sister recently got a 17in. iMac and I quickly grew tired of explaining more advanced things to her. I sent her to BN to pick up a missing manual. Chock full of actually useful information. Everyday I learn something about the Mac I had no idea about and I've been using computers for over 10 years. There's a lot of stuff in those nifty white enclosures.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    11. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by jafac · · Score: 1

      I hate (not dislike, hate) iTunes for the exact same reason.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by jafac · · Score: 1

      I prefer Thorsten Lemke's fantastic Graphics Converter.

      It has a browser which "don't need no stinkin' import"

      You have your files organized in the file system the way you want - and it browses them. The best of both worlds. Honestly, I really don't understand what iPhoto is for.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by jafac · · Score: 1

      This is true for every VB program I've ever worked on.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Simple: iPhoto is for my girlfriend. I bought my girlfriend a digital camera for Christmas last year, and she's become a regular shutterbug ever since. She loves iPhoto and so do I. The best part about it: She NEVER asks me any questions about it. She figured it out on her own in about 10 minutes. This used to be from the woman who would crash her Win98 machine several times a day and I ended up playing tech support every time she had a problem. Getting her to switch to a Mac was one of the best things I ever did! Anyway, getting her to used 5 or 6 different apps where one does the trick would be an absolute nightmare. Not only that, but she uses it to create slideshows for iMovie. I know Graphics Converter is a sweet little app, but can it do that?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  7. Re:Bookpool by justMichael · · Score: 3, Informative

    And Bookpool has it $1.97 cheaper than Amazon.

    You'd think that the geeks would be using bookpool as opposed to Amazon.

  8. What they really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    is a missing manual to find the second mouse button.

    1. Re:What they really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you need to buy "The Missing Button," it's just one more thing Apple left out for third parties to provide.

      And thanks to Mac-boosted USB, you can daisy-chain your mice together!!! Oh, yeah, baby! Both hands, both feet, and any other appendages you find useful!

  9. Missing legitimacy by FromWithin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the "Missing Manual" series should be renamed to the "I've got a cracked version" series.

    1. Re:Missing legitimacy by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      ever seen the legitimate manual that comes with a Mac? It's not even a pamphlet. It's more a flyer.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    2. Re:Missing legitimacy by 64K · · Score: 1

      That might be funny if you needed a crack for iPhoto 2, but actually it is a free download for anyone running Mac OS X v10.1.5 or later

  10. But what about the plot? by sxltrex · · Score: 5, Funny

    What kind of review is this? I want to find out about character development and whether or not there are any glaring plot holes! And you didn't even give away the ending! All you told me was why I might find this book useful.

    Oh, wait...

  11. Re:Fist Sport! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whomever modded this up should be clubbed to death by rabid baby seals.

  12. iPhoto is free, Graphic Converter is shareware by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    I use iPhoto simply because it's free.

  13. Slashbot book review by rkz · · Score: 3, Informative

    This one is a great addition to the book shelf, you all know how to do certain things in IPhoto but this book clarifies nicely why you are actually doing it. Also, it introduces nice advanced features and concepts which amatures might not have come across before.

  14. iPhoto SLOOOOOW with big libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this yet, but I had to abandon iPhoto in favor of iView Media.

    I imported my 3500+ digital pics I've taken over the years into iPhoto only to find that the application slows down to the point of unusability. Every few operations I attempted to perform would hang for a minute or more -- including simple things like seeing context menus. I did a usenet search and discovered that others had experienced a similar slowdown with large collections in iPhoto.

    1. Re:iPhoto SLOOOOOW with big libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this with iPhoto 2? I had this problem with version 1 and quit using it, but version 2 ran faster.

      i ended up disabling the drop shadow too - that really sped things up.

    2. Re:iPhoto SLOOOOOW with big libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discolosure triangles are your friends. Hide the rolls you aren't currently using, and blammo -- quite likely faster than you've ever seen it, and you lose the visual clutter of the stuff you don't want, to boot.

  15. I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org by nikko · · Score: 1


    The problem with iPhoto is that it does not have a web interface. And sharing via iMac web services is tedious and limited in storage.

    Pixory solves all of these problems. And best of all, of course, it runs on Linux!

    www.pixory.org

    1. Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      have you had luck running it on mac osx? on the faq, it says that it doesn't work...

    2. Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org by nikko · · Score: 1

      nope, haven't tried this.

    3. Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org by holt · · Score: 1

      So if it doesn't run on OSX, what good is it to current iPhoto users?

  16. Re:Western decadence and the righteousness of Isla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sed s/women/macintoshes/

  17. Fuck you you little worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    users are liberal, leftist fruitcakes with little or no recognition of reality.

    Hey, I am a liberal, left-leaning queer and that was plain insulting!

    Can you say that the current foreign policy of your adored George Walker Bush has any connection to the reality?! Oh yeah, let's alienate all our friends and abandon our moral high ground when it comes to applying deadly force only when truly necessary.

  18. gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best photo management tool is Gallery (http://gallery.menalto.com/). It is completely web based, it has an excellent rights system, people can leave comments, and it has precompiled image manipulation libraries for mac. I used to heavily use Iphoto, but it just wasn't good enough.

    1. Re:gallery by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      The cool thing is that you can use both together. Use iPhoto on your mac to manage things locally, and then drag and drop images you want published from iPhoto to the Gallery Remote application for publishing to the web.

      I decided I wasn't going to renew my .Mac account, and immediately switched to Gallery for my picture publishing, and it's GREAT!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For iPhoto users, myPhoto [ http://agent0068.dyndns.org/~mike/projects/myPhoto ] offers a lot more integration with iPhoto. Definitely worth a look

  19. Pouge is Great! by joel8x · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just browsed through the sample chapter and its full of usefull hints such as editing the book templates with Apple's developer tools. This is a great book for for people who are new to Macs or aren't tech-heads.

    OTOH, any Mac geek can find all of this info easily at MacOSXHints.com

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  20. Re:iPhoto Problem by oscast · · Score: 1

    The same copy and pasted troll again I see...

  21. The target audience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The target audience for this book would probably
    > be a little less technical than myself or the
    > average Slashdot reader

    So...ummm...you're saying that you're a little more technical than the average Slashdot reader?

  22. Re:iPhoto Problem by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The 8600 didn't come with Firewire, so you're using some kind of add-on firewire card. Sounds like that's your problem.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  23. Re:iPhoto Problem by jub · · Score: 1

    hi troll!

    1997 called and they want their gripe back.

  24. Re:iSlashdot Problem by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Funny


    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Slashdot fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Slashdot screen for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 line troll from one message thread on the hard drive to another thread. 20 minutes. At home, on my Kur05hin account, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Slashdot, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this troll transfer, Netscape will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even fuckedcompany.net is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Slashdots, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Slashdot that has run faster than its Kuro5hin
    counterpart, despite the Slashdot's faster troll architecture. my.yahoo.com with 8 categories of Rueters Top News runs faster than this site at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that Slashdot is a superior forum.
    Slashdot addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use Slashdot over other faster, cheaper, more stable forums.

  25. iPhoto for dummies not IDG by PMcGovern · · Score: 2, Informative

    IDG no longer publishes Dummies books. They sold the division to Wiley a few years ago.

    FYI.

  26. iPhoto features by 47Ronin · · Score: 4, Informative

    One big problem that Apple hasn't responded to is sharing a photo library among multiple users. In the current setup, each user of the system has their own home dir, and therefore separate photo libraries, inaccessible by the other users. While iPhoto currently supports a central repository for photos (roughly), it doesn't like it if you try to store it on a network server. Right now I have an old mac running OSX with my iPhoto Library stored on a separate drive. All my other macs are connected to it via 10/100 Ethernet and we mount that drive remotely to access the photos via iPhoto. Let me tell ya, it's DOG SLOW. even with 100Base-T bandwidth, iPhoto only uses a trickle of that potential. Instead of chewing up about 1MB/sec, it accesses the library at about 35kB/sec, so loading albums is a major test of patience.

    --
    Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  27. can't 'order prints' by zojas · · Score: 1
    When I try to order prints through iphoto, it fails every time to upload the pictures to apple, asking me to check my network connection.

    and I've turned off my firewall, plugged my ibook straight into the cable modem, and have even tried it over my 56k modem.

    1. Re:can't 'order prints' by Keepiru · · Score: 1

      How many pages are you trying to print? There is a limit to the number of pages you can upload, I did a search on that error message on apples site to find that out. I think it's 65 pages.

    2. Re:can't 'order prints' by zojas · · Score: 1

      I was trying to print 8 individual 4x6 images, not a book.

  28. Re:iPhoto Problem by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    This poster has got to be joking. I don't think it's a troll; s/he's trying to be funny. Or at least I hope that's the case.

    I mean, if this site were CarDot, and this thread were about the hot new Ford Mustang convertible, would anyone take it seriously if I complained that whenever I drive a '79 Pinto it blows up, whereas my old AMC Pacer X Rally Edition was still going strong?

    It's actually kind of funny. Too bad s/he posted anonymously...

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  29. MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I was a whiny left-wing mac user, until I read your post! Thanks for opening my eyes, my Christian brother!

  30. Re:iPhoto Problem by Morky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wish /. could filter out repeating trolls like this one and the gay mac user one. I sometimes like to read trolls if they are on topic, but these useless ones get in the way of that. How about "-20 Repeat Troll"?

  31. Serious Work? by Phrogz · · Score: 1
    ...until I started doing some serious work with iPhoto

    What? Look, this isn't a MacOS bash--I love my macs and use iPhoto all the time. But other than filling up iPhoto with thousands of photos (and that doesn't even count) what is 'serious work' with iPhoto? It's simply not that deep an application.

  32. Re:iPhoto Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This troll gets posted on every Apple/Mac story.

  33. Re:Attention Apple users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's long been accepted that Apple users are liberal, leftist fruitcakes

    Actually I remember seeing a switch add in a magazine awhile ago that said George W. Bush was a Mac user. He's not exactly what I would call a liberal.

  34. iPhoto will display the folder names after import by Nutrimentia · · Score: 1

    Go to the iPhoto view menu and select By Roll. ALl the folder names are there now. It would be nice for nesting though.

    And support for the little videos that digicams can take.

  35. Re:iPhoto Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't seen anything if you haven't browsed the BSD section at -1. It boggles the mind how anyone would think that posting multiple copies of the same trolls for years on end to each and every article there is funny. Even wake-and-bake stoners get tired of telling the same jokes after a while.

  36. Re:iPhoto Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that gripe belongs to 1998. They would appreciate it immensely if you would return the gripe to its rightful owners, and keep it out of 1997's dirty little hands. Thanks!

  37. Re:iPhoto Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice idea. How about some sort of Bayesian analyzer, which is all the rage in spam filters these days? Seems that would do the trick on modified trolls such as this one. CmdrTaquito, are you listening???