Slashdot Mirror


Build-to-Order Cars?

MadMonk writes "Baseline has an article about a new car company that wants to be 'the Dell of the auto industry.' Build-To-Order, Inc. could turn the auto industry on its ear. At worst, BTO will be an interesting technology petri dish. I want a customized car to match my customized computer."

38 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet! Imagine the case mods! by Limburgher · · Score: 4, Funny
    Transparent windows, cool lights, and you can even open the front of the case while it's runni. . .oh, wait, that's what we have now.

    Insert random quotation about the hood being helding shut.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  2. custom? by JeffSh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    isn't calling a dell computer a "custom" computer a bit of a stretch? they're interchangable parts, its not like they are custom built.

    it's henry fords interchangable parts manufacturing line, but with mcdonalds order panels telling the monkey what part to put in and where. I don't see the big innovation with so called "custom" pc's...

    1. Re:custom? by fidget42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The current auto manufactureres are already the "Dell of automobiles." They give you a selection of options (color, radio, interior, etc.) and you can choose what you want. If you want something for which they don't have a configuration then you don't get it (go ahead and try to get a real Windows CD from Dell, I dare you) or it costs you more than it should.

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    2. Re:custom? by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Informative

      The current auto manufactureres are already the "Dell of automobiles." They give you a selection of options (color, radio, interior, etc.) and you can choose what you want. If you want something for which they don't have a configuration then you don't get it

      The difference is that if you don't want something that they do have, then the unwanted car will be standing, and potentially sold at a discount (whereas the unwanted Dell is never built). The losses from the unwanted cars are passed on to the consumer, in the price of the popular varieties.

      Tor

  3. Huh? That's how it's here in the Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't read the article, but that's how it works here in the Netherlands: you order the color, the engine, the interior color, airco yes/no, RPM meter, etc, etc. That's sounds like more choice than with Dell.

    1. Re:Huh? That's how it's here in the Netherlands by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Informative
      You can do that in the USA, too. Virtually any auto maker will build you a car to your specs (options, color, etc.). Since the 1980s the options have been more-or-less bundled, and it's a bitch to order them separated (I want a sunroof but I don't want to pay for fog lights to get it!), but you can do it.

      Option bundling is because of the imports. When you're shipping a car from Germany or Japan to the USA, you're gonna have to wait a while for them to build you a car to your specs. So the imports got into the habit of offering two or three option packages, then building cars with those packages in all possible color combos. Then, if one dealer didn't have the package you wanted in the color you wanted, probably another dealer in the area did. The domestic makers (GM, Ford, Chrysler) picked up on this because it's what the public wanted. Most people want their car NOW, not in 4 to 6 weeks, and they're willing to take fog lights to get the sunroof.

      I don't see how this company is going to overcome the public's desire for instant gratification. Pick a car, drive it home today.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Huh? That's how it's here in the Netherlands by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can do that in the USA, too. Virtually any auto maker will build you a car to your specs (options, color, etc.). Since the 1980s the options have been more-or-less bundled, and it's a bitch to order them separated (I want a sunroof but I don't want to pay for fog lights to get it!), but you can do it.

      People seem to have missed the point completely. The point isn't that build-to-order enables a bunch of new varieties. Sure, you can still order your favorite color and CD player. The difference is how it is achieved: presently they build a bunch of common varieties. If you want an unusual combination, they will make sure that it is included in the next shipment (or possibly even build it for you).

      The difference with build-to-order is that cars are only made if they are ordered. This has the potential of lower car costs, because you minimize the losses of the varieites that stand unsold, and the ones that have to be shipped from one area to another.

      I don't see how this company is going to overcome the public's desire for instant gratification. Pick a car, drive it home today.

      This is a good point. I think the answer is money. If I could get a car at say $500 or $1000 cheaper (which may be achievable with the new business model), I would probably be willing to wait with the gratification for a week or two.

      Tor

  4. GM already had this idea by tgrigsby · · Score: 5, Informative

    If I recall correctly, GM has already had designs in the works for an electric car that would be built on top of a "skateboard", basically a car base with batteries and electronics all built in. You could pop any shell/interior top onto that base. The idea was that you spent the big bucks on the base, and then spend your fashion dollars on a new top from year to year. In fact, an aftermarket was envisioned for custom, made to order, modularized, pop-together tops for the base.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    1. Re:GM already had this idea by tgrigsby · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, here's a URL:

      http://money.cnn.com/2002/01/08/autos/auto_tech/

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  5. This is a horrible idea..... by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can take all the best car parts in the world and put them together and the car probably won't even run. This article even admits that, and says they are developing systems to make the parts communicate and work together. Think about what this means. Car 1 is a normal car with normal parts the break down at a normal rate. Car 2 is a car with the best of each type of part that breaks down slightly less often than the parts of car 1, only for the parts of car 2 you need an extra widget for each of the parts to make the parts communicate.

    Now even if you have the most high end parts on the market that never break, you still have 50% more parts total to make them work together. That means that each part has to work 66% better and last 66% longer just to break even. Plus imagine how heavy and awkward the car will be with all these extra widgets. This is just another scam to part fools from their money, it makes absolutely no sense from an engineering point of view. Sure you get pretty platinum coated spark plugs, but will they fit in the engine block!

    1. Re:This is a horrible idea..... by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really don't see it work unless they have some kind of standard like computers do. What Dell and other companies have going for them is that a video card from one company will fit in their systems as long as Dell includes an AGP port. Therefore, it is really easy to "customize" a computer for their customers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think such standards exists in the auto industry.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    2. Re:This is a horrible idea..... by jayratch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Karma to burn...

      RTFA. He referred to the concept as an "open source car" and seeks to get the vendors to agree on standards. This isn't taking an engine from Daimler and interfacing it with a transmission from GM- which, incidentally, is how it already works in the car business. The Cadillac CTS uses the same Gertag 6-speed transmission as the BMW 5, mated to entirely different (though similar) platforms. By your logic, then the 5 must be a dog because of all they had to do to use GM's tranny.

      In fact, the idea is fundamentally similar to the current custom car industry. Basically, several standards exist on the hotrod market- Chevy, Ford, or Mopar small or large blocks, Ford rear ends, GM Hydramatic trannys are basically interoperable in the custome market- and pick up a copy of Hot Rod magazine to see the hundreds of vendors making interiors, AC systems, pulley and belts, etc for these, mix and match as you choose.

      How is this like Dell? When Dell got started in force, they were among the only ones using true standard "clone" components, while IBM, Apple, and even Compaq were building proprietary boards, when a custom component market had already started. Custom cars aren't new, but custom cars with all federal safety and emissions features for under $100,000 and within a year is a new concept.

      And your platinum spark plugs? The ones in every Chevy Trailblazer I sell are compatible with the ones in my VW GTI. Components are standard by nature until "embrace and extend" (see: custom audio systems with proprietary connectors in OEM applications vs. aftermarket standards) changes that.

      Just my .02...

    3. Re:This is a horrible idea..... by einTier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, no such standard exists in the car industry. You can plug a Chevy engine into a Mazda, but it requires an awful lot of work, and even then, it's not going to be as reliable as the stock engine in the stock vehicle.

      I don't see how it can work. What they are going to end up with is a car that's only slightly more customizible than a Ford. Maybe you can pick your color from a million different colors, or your interior material from thousands of materials, but even this requires a lot of logistics. Car manufacturers don't limit your choice of color because they only want you to have a few choices, they limit it because changing colors on the assembly line is a lot of time and work. You can have maybe a dozen or so colors ready to go, but mixing and readying a special paint for one car takes a lot of time.

      It's a great idea, but I think it's way ahead of its time.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  6. Right... by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope they are backed by a large political party, or organized crime. Else the big3 will have them summarily executed.

    Havent we been here before? I think this is how all car companies start out. The world is too corrupt or im a big fat cynic.

  7. Dual Dude Jokes? by Aliencow · · Score: 4, Funny

    The title of the article is "Dude, you're gettin' a car". To which I reply : "Dude, where's my Dell??"

  8. Why won't the big automakers do this? by weave · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've never understood, with just-in-time parts delivery at plants, why auto makers can't or don't do this. Why can't I go to their website and pick out my colors and options and have it built and delivered to my dealer a few weeks later?

    Some automaker sites have a "build my car" page where you pick what you want, then they do an inventory search and list some that are close as possible to what you want.

    If you go to a dealer and ask to have a special order, they get pretty upset. I guess this is understandable since they really want to move the inventory off their lot instead.

    But seriously, it's the inventory sitting around that's the big money drainer on a business like this. If they can radically reduce inventory and also reduce the time from manufacture to customer, it means less inventory carrying expense and happier customers.

    1. Re:Why won't the big automakers do this? by DevilM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two words; labor union!

    2. Re:Why won't the big automakers do this? by ksheff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and since his plant is going to be unionized (one of the conditions for getting funding from the California pension fund), his plans for building a super flexible custom car with huge profit margins are going to be like an egg hitting a brick wall. GM is already doing this sort of crap, but in other countries like Germany because of the UAW work rules.

      Sounds more like he will be selling a 'kit car' with all the aftermarket goodies that people like to use to dress up their cars. The article makes no mention of who will be making the powertrain. I'm sure the other carmakers will also try to lean on these suppliers (they are already their biggest customers) to jack up his prices or have that company pay for the R&D and then cherry pick from the successful products.

      (I also found it odd/annoying that this story about the 'dell of carmakers' was plastered with ads for the real Dell. Is this a story about BTO or a fluff piece used to mention Dell as many times as possible.) The Linux/MS.Net aspect was interest. They won't consider Unix "because it's 20 year old technology", but the same proven methods and tools is what makes up linux. Maybe they hired a buzzword-only-CTO.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:Why won't the big automakers do this? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting
      One word: Bollocks.

      I work in the automotive industry. I can tell you right off why they never try anything radical and new: size.

      Car manufacturing is a complex beast. You have factories churning out huge, unstorable, and expensive metal boxes. These are assembled from the output of similar factories producting smaller metal units. Everything has to work perfectly for a car company to stay afloat: it has to receive every part in a timely manner. The factories have to use these up quickly enough not to require large amounts of warehousing. And, and here's the kicker, the cars have to be shipped to dealers and then sold at the same rate as the factory is producing them.

      Every time a large automotive manufacturer puts out a new model, it's taking hundreds of risks. The factories will have to be retooled - what if the parts don't actually fit together? What if there's a technical flaw with the car? The marketing has to hit the right audience, what if too few or too many people buy it?

      It's not the computer industry. You can't just shove all the unsold items in a large room somewhere, flog them cheap, and then bury the remainder in Arizona, Nevada, or New Mexico. Nor can you easily and responsively tune the factories to consumer demand, because it's not just a matter of switching off a metal press, you also have to deal with the fact that there are physical ships in the oceans with half your cars in them, and they're not going to turn around and take the parts back to where they came from.

      Can you think of any other industry that deals with consumer items of this scale, quantity, and size?

      Given all of this, you can probably imagine that one phrase governs the outlook of virtually all but the smallest of car companies: risk aversion. New technologies are only incrementally introduced. New types of vehicle are rarely introduced (even the minivan's potential could be judged by Chrysler by comparing it to things like the VW mini-bus), "radical" changes tend to be with look rather than functionality. Ford and GM's marketing and manufacturing departments want to be able to predict how successful a car will be, and the more radical the product, the less able they are to do this.

      I have no idea where you put unions into all of this. Unions are merely concerned with making sure their members don't get a raw deal. Producing new products, and hence creating more jobs, doesn't do their members any harm. This is purely a management issue, and an understandable management issue: the possibility of Ford or GM going from being massively profitable one year, to bankrupt the next, is not non-existant. A major slip up can cause this. Which is why, when you see manufacturers playing with anything new at all, you usually see them in small quantities, with little or no marketing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  9. BTO!! by JebusIsLord · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah BTO, Canada's answer to ELO! Their greatest hit was TCB. /simpsons

    --
    Jeremy
  10. The article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The preconceived notion is that the network will run Unix, but I came to the view that this is a unique opportunity, so why take something that's decades old?" says Lele.

    By that logic, the concept of a internal combustion engine is over 100 years old, and seats are thousands of years old. Maybe he shouldn't use those either.

  11. Instead, better choices from current companies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I purchased a new car about a year ago and was dismayed by the way the option packages worked at the dealers.

    As a somewhat practical person, I had no interest in wings or crazy wheels or chrome door handles. However, when it came to features I did want, I couldn't understand why the big engine isn't available with a stick shift, or why ABS can't be obtained with a sun roof, or why fog lights can't be purchased with an upgraded stereo model, etc.

    Above all else, desiring a manual transmission turned me into an instant showroom pariah, as if I had the plague. "I don't know if they even make that model with a stick shift," said one salesman. I understand that manual transmission cars are purchased with greatly reduced frequency compared to automatics, but why bother selling stick shift cars if you make no effort to allow customers to buy them?

    Build-To-Order cars could be the next big thing for informed and frustrated car shoppers, but I have a great deal of apprehension towards the quality of the vehicle and the likelihood I could get it serviced at my local mechanic.

    Eric

  12. Choice Qualifications by mistermund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The preconceived notion is that the network will run Unix, but I came to the view that this is a unique opportunity, so why take something that's decades old?"

    Saying that something that's "decades old" won't fit your new business model simply because of its age seems like a short-sighted way to base a decision. Building an IT infrastructure is not only about fitting your needs, but also about one that will serve you reliably. In the end it doesn't matter what the network runs on, but rather that it works, whether it's Unix, Linux, or .NET.

    Just sounds to me like these cars won't have rubber tires simply because they've been in use on automobiles for a century.

  13. I've read the article. Here's a summary. by jhoffoss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They build you a car. It is highly customizable. You can choose things like Ralph Lauren seats, pretty much any radio on the market, , etc. There will also be multiple vendors for the same parts. So maybe Tommy Hilfiger seats too, or something along those lines. And you will purchase, configure, and finance the car online. So as others have said, this is NOT the Dell of automakers. This is the white-box PC store of automakers.

    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  14. Mini already does this by D3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    All Mini Cooper models are built to order. I toured the production plant in Oxford England recently. 100% just-in-time manufacturing process. You'll have a blue British spec followed by a yellow North American spec followed by another color Japanese spec, etc. Of the hundreds of cars in the plant at the time NONE of them were exactly the same as mine and probably not as each other.

    Now, if this guy has the same 280 Million British Pounds to invest in building a plant (as was done by BMW group for the Mini), more power to him. I doubt he realizes what he's really getting into. Probably trying to build hype in the media to attract the investors he needs for such a project.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:Mini already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of the hundreds of cars in the plant at the time NONE of them were exactly the same as mine and probably not as each other.

      My understanding is that no two MG's were the same either, only it wasn't on purpose.

    2. Re:Mini already does this by Surak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I work in the auto biz, and the job I had before this one (less than 2 years ago) was working for the Manufacturing Technology Applications department in the North American Vehicle Operations division of the world's largest auto maker.

      Let me tell you. Minis are not BTO. First off, BTO implies that you can order anything -- different body styles, even custom panels. Mini doesn't do this. Minis may be built using JIT, but JIT is a lie. It's an accounting trick. There is no JIT, YHBT. ;)

      Secondly, cars of different colors, options, and different body styles, even different makes are already produced on the same line. GM does this every single day. In fact, in it's Lake Orion, MI, assembly plant, three different models and brands are produced in the same plant. At it's assembly plant in Hamtramck, cars and trucks even roll off the same line (or will if they haven't started already).

      No what this guy is talking about is totally different. GM announced a similar technology last year. Mostly it involves creating modular vehicle, shifting production work from plants to Tier 1 suppliers. Entire doors, entire ends of the car, and in some cases, even entire bodies, completely assembled, would be shipped to the assembly plant, where the body would mostly simply be married to the engine and chassis, which roll down the line in one piece (this is actually already how most cars are built, just the rest isn't custom build-to-order).

  15. Good! by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm so sick of car makers picking the most idiodic interior/exterior color combinations. Beige leather, ick! Why is that so often matched with the blue exterior I want? Why can you only get black leather when you get a boring black exterior?

    Also burlwood. I f'ing hate burlwood. Yet almost every top of the line vehicle (Acura, Lexus, etc) slathers it over every surface. Why do the cheapeast Honda Civic have metal or carbon-fiber interior options yet no options on the high end?

    When I bought my car, I actually told my dealer I wouldn't mind waiting a month if I could get a specific combination right from the factory. I was even willing to pay transportation. I was told it was impossible. It's no more work for the factory to put one color in place of another, so I'm glad someone finally realized this and is offering the option.

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  16. The BTO website by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 4, Informative


    http://www.btoauto.com/

    It would have been nice to see exactly what the article was talking about, by linking to it in the summary...you know, because this is slashdot.

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  17. Cars for tall people? by mbstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article doesn't address whether tall people like me will be able to spec the custom cars such that we will be able to fit in 'em. I've sat in every car at auto shows and found little satisfaction, even in super-expensive models like BMWs. With great difficulty, I can buy shoes -- not true of cars. I would love to be able to buy a car that fits me.

  18. Free million dollar idea by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    OK, built to order cars. You can pretty much do that now, although he seems to be intent on giving more choices.

    But if he's really going to try to do something new in the industry, as well a greatly increase the ability to build cards to "spec", I would suggest he seriously consider rethinking the way that car electronics mount and interconnect. I think it's insane the way dashboards are built today, and I'm not crazy about how hard it is to change a radio or install something extra like my ham radio. What the industry really needs is someone not trying hard to lock the customer in, but rather making things much more modular so the customer has the greatest number of choices. I would love to see a system where the instrument pannel, radio, gps/map, and any other electronics (including the computer) are all standaridized "rack" units networked and powered together, such that any device can be located anywhere in the system. If I want a bigger spedometer and tack, I should just be able to plug it into a couple of rack unit spaces. If I want my moving map right in the middle of my dash I just move the speedometer over (or maybe replace it with one integrated into the oil pressure / alternator / warning lights/ trip computer display) and put the video module where the speedometer was. If I get a ham radio made for this technology it should fit into an available bay and cleanly integrate with the rest of the car audio, letting me hear it through the speakers and optionally muting the CD player when there is radio traffic.

    Eventually I would see this leading to "soft" displays, where you can use a pannel for whatever you want, speedometer, tach, warning lights, trip computer, or any new feature you program into a flexiable computer. True button switch pannels could be used, or touch screens that reconfigure themselves as needed, depending on the user's preference. Users could even elect, if they wished, to replace a digital speedometer with a white analog needle module (with appropriate electronics in the module) if they prefer that style of instrument over digital displays.

    Sure, major players are not doing this now because they want to lock you into their stuff. But a modular system should give a truly flexiable design, lower overall costs, and much great utility. If someone is going to claim to want to make build to order cars, them this approach should be a must.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Free million dollar idea by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, car thieves will just love your free million dollar idea.

      Not if done right. Certainly some modules (like the computer) could be on the network but not in the open with easy access. But all of these devices are going to have to talk together (there might not even be a speedometer as such, just an x pixel by y pixel display that the computer knows how to display the current speed on in an attractive manner). One thing on the network would certainly be a nice secure digital ignition key (actually, the reader for the key). Any module could be made to learn the Car's ID, VIN number, igition key code and more when it is installed and it's installation software run (perhaps by inserting the installation CD in the CD player!) and save that in flash memory on the device. The device could then refuse to work if it's not uninstalled before being removed, and you need the key to uninstall it (and you need the owner key as well, not the valet key, which has a different code, and also locks you out from some things like the car phone or garage door opener). So a well designed system would actually produce much more secure devices and instruments than we have now, and even though they would not work if improperly removed, they could show (in the case of a display, or say through the speakers in the case of a radio without a built in display) that they were stolen and even give the car they came from and the owner's contact information information. Devices made for the new system would actually be much more secure than they are now, where, if you forget to remove the front panel and put it in your pocket where it can be broken, your radio will be stolen (and sometimes even when you do)

      And remember: even the computer should be replaceable (or maybe you want multiple computers in your car), so the computers should learn their owner's key ID and refuse to run if moved to a different car too without be uninstalled.

      Here are a few other advantages of the system:

      Want to install something like fog lights in you car? Just plug them into power and the network. No need to mount an extra ugly switch on the dash, the network can control them through the same set of soft controls on the steering wheel that controls curise control, the radio and cd player, the door locks, the power windows, the GPS, the power mirrors, the car cell phone, and about everything else you add in (as can any other control panel you program to do so). And the computer can even give the lights extra features like automatic turn off when the ignition is turned off.

      No need for the maker to install seat belt buzzers, ignition switch buzzers, Headlights left on buzzers, and other similar alerts; all that audio just goes to the existing speakers through the network. Lots of other small savings too, like no need for that turn signal blinker (just another thing that now gets done in software).

      Want a rear view camera, or a low light front vision IR system? Just install the camera by the back bumper or behind the grill and plug it into the network, then install the software. One of your existing display panels can be programmed to display this video on demand, when it's not a GPS display, CD player index, trip computer, speedometer, or even displaying the menu for the drive through fast food joint you just pulled into.

      And along with this much greater utility the maker saves a small fortune in wire and makes a lighter car.

      I doubt that I or anyone else can even predict what all can be done with such a system (although I have a number of additional ideas). Once such a technology becomes open it would evolve at a much greater pace than even the "concept cars" that we see showing things that we will never really be offered.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  19. All cars are BTO in Europe by wimbor · · Score: 4, Informative
    Is this a troll or for real? All car makers to my knowledge do this BTO...

    I know that all large European car makers are doing this already. My VW Golf that I bought last year was custom made, as are most VW's that you buy. You have 4 basic trims (Base, Comfortline, Highline and Trendline) and you can add options, features, colors (inside and outside), fabrics, ... like you wish. These trim levels are even not decided by VW, but by the importer in each country. A Base model in Belgium does not have traction control, in Germany that is standard on all Golf's.

    Only very few cars of the VW/Audi group are built by order of the factory, and most of these company ordered cars end up in the showroom to give the public a general idea of what is available. Often you get even a discount on those models because they are not 100% configured to your own wishes....

    Volkswagen has a "car configurator" on their website that can make thousands of possible Golf configurations.

    Do you really mean you cannot order your own car in the USA? I'm stunned... I thought buying stock cars was almost impossible these days...

  20. More importantly...... by macshune · · Score: 3, Funny

    When am I gonna be able to purchase a Canyonero?

    Can you name the truck with four wheel drive, smells like a steak, and seats thirty five?
    Canyonero! Canyonero!
    Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down, it's the country-fried truck endorsed by a clown
    Canyonero! Canyonero!
    Hey, hey!
    Twelve yards long, two lanes wide, sixty five tons of American pride!
    Canyonero! Canyonero!
    Top of the line in utility sports, unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!
    Canyonero! Canyonero!
    She blinds everybody with her super high beams, she's a squirrel-squashin', deer-smackin' drivin' machine
    Canyonero! Canyonero! Canyonero!

    Whoa, Canyonero! Whoa!

  21. Re:Cars are not computers by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Acutally, very few people perform automotive mods themselves these days. At the track I go to, I'd say 85% of cars are modded the same way by the same hadful of sport dealers. Of course, it's the other 15% that tend to burn them, but most people like the idea of spending a little extra to get it done RIGHT. After all, who wants to drop $5900 on a turbo mod, get halfway through it, and torch the engine? Better to make AAA Autospyd or XXX-trem Grafick Kreations do the work, and take the liability.

    Plus, some of these assholes are modding LEASED CARS. You don't want to break your car, that's true, but you SURE AS SHIT don't want to break the bank's car.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  22. And how would you crash test this? by The+Or's · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you had to crash test every conceivable variation of seat/engine/body panel/dashboard the costs would be prohibitive. If you didn't safety test each combination, no-one would buy them & no insurer would insure them.

    Also, the Dell comparison is silly; cars are an order of magnitude more complicated than PC's.

  23. Welcome to the world of Porsche... by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My last two Boxster's were built to order to my specifications. Waiting 3+ months for your car to arrive is a bitch, but the anticipation can be fun.

    There are literally hundreds of options/choices that you can pick. I really like the idea of everything being "a la carte" so you don't end up paying for features that you don't care about. I also like the idea of knowing that my car is +/- unique (or at least relatively unique)...

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  24. Re:But what we really need... by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Airbags weren't available yet in 1983.

    They were optional from some manufacturers as far back as the mid-70s or so. There's a timeline here that says the first airbag-equipped car to roll off a production line was a '73 Oldsmobile Toronado (with dual airbags, no less). They were available in certain models from Olds, Buick, and Cadillac until 1977...in the years they were available, only about 10000 cars were ordered with airbags. It's true that they didn't become common until the early '90s (and I'd just as soon have the choice to buy a vehicle without them), but they were available farther back than most people would guess.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.