Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Picnic, Pistol, Doggedness

Slashback tonight brings you updates on low-power hardware, unauthorized music distribution by buymusic.com, and more, including a reminder of the upcoming (now annual) Linux picnic at the conclusion of LWCE. (If you're not there, start your own local chapter ;)) Read on for more!

MenuetOS progresses. For those with a taste for esoteric tiny operating systems for low-power systems, the x86 release of Contiki wasn't the only news this week. Lgd writes "Menuet, the 100 % assembly OS, has made quite a few improvements since it was last reported at Slashdot. Menuet has now a simple tcp/ip stack with tiny http, mp3 and email servers, FASM 1.48 assembler and demo applications like the 3d maze."

Perhaps this will lead to a finer toothed comb overall. Jody Whitesides writes "Hello, I want to take a moment to update you about my situation that you posted recently... As of right now, I won my fight with BuyMusic and the Orchard. I have been promptly let out of a contract that was already terminated February 1st of 2001. It seems they had kept me in their catalog on a contract clause that had been overlooked when the contract was signed back in 1999.

As of 5 p.m. pst 07/31/2003 I was given notice that I was removed from the Orchard's distribution. In turn I have since checked with BuyMusic's website and have been swiftly removed from the website and now all has been set right in the world. It seems that even the big corporations don't wish to face copyright infringement.

I want to thank you for running the story as I have no doubt that it helped bring a swift decision in getting my music under my control so that I can best determine how fans will get it into their hands.

I harbor no ill will towards BuyMusic or the Orchard."

MandrakeSoft still not dead (wants to go for a walk). LinuxGeek8 writes "In their latest shareholder newsletter MandrakeSoft made a few statements about their financial position. Their retail sales decreased, while their high-margin sales (oem, club, online sales, etc.) increased. In total their revenue decreased somewhat, while the operating loss decreased. Since January they have been cash-flow positive.

Quoting about their "Chapter 11": "On January 27th, 2003, the Commercial Court granted MandrakeSoft a six month observation and protection period (similar to a U.S. Chapter 11 procedure). This period will end on July 27th, 2003. The company is pursuing an opportunity to be granted an additional six month observation and protection period. In the upcoming months, the company's objective is to exit the Observation Period with a 'Continuation Plan'."
Things seem to be looking good on the radar."

This is good news for those of us who like all the work that Mandrake has put into making Free software easy to install.

Video Capturing Part 2 at Ars Technica miskatonic alumnus writes "Recently, slashdot reported on an excellent article -- Part I: Video Capture -- of the 3-part series 'Guide to Capturing, Cleaning & Compressing Video' at Ars Technica. At last, Part II: Video Cleaning is now available."

The largest gathering, of a sort. Linda Denison links to these "several articles about GenCon, handily linked to one place!"

From the article: 'GenCon: Freaks & Geeks,' she excerpts: 'My wife wrinkled her nose in response. Computer geeks tend to be clean. They wear clean clothes, and bathe regularly. Usually this is because they live in their mother's house. Probably in their old room. Tabletop geeks tend to wear the same clothes they bought in their early twenties, roughly three belt sizes ago, and aren't well versed in the bathing arts. This is because they live in their mother's basement. The heat sort of exacerbated this problem.'

(We've run a couple of articles originating at this year's GenCon already.)

Sci-Fi Auction Followup... cjustus writes "The live auction mentioned earlier in the week is over... Here are the prices that items went for. The big item? Original George Reeves Superman Costume for $110K ... Harrison Ford's pistol from Blade Runner went for $17K... Any slashdotters bid / win?"

Matching hardware to actual needs is not crazytalk. Michael C. Barnes writes with a followup to the recent mention of his company's low-power MicroServer, which, it turns out, has a larger sibling. "One of the people reading your post did a review of the Microserver HP. ... The person doing the review benchmarked our Microserver High Performance and thought it did a reasonably good job with My SQL."

"Penguin dip" is just an expression. Bill Kendrick writes "This Saturday, August 9th (after the Linux World Expo) San Francisco Bay Area Linux lovers and the people who love them will be gathering at the Baylands Park in Sunnyvale for Picn*x12, the third annual Linux anniversary picnic. Organized by several local LUGs and sponsored by Oracle, this barbecue is a free event for the entire family."

Whether or not you can get to the picnic, FeeDBaCK writes "It has been almost 2 years since the Linux Counter has been mentioned on Slashdot. It was last mentioned in October of 2001 and brought on an impressive number of registrations. Accounts are deleted after 2 years of inactivity, so now is a good time for everyone to freshen up their account, or create a new one if they don't have one already."

143 comments

  1. Heh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    MenuetOS looks like some weird screwy version of BeOS! (I have a fetish for this kind of OS.)

    1. Re:Heh! by Microsofts+slave · · Score: 1

      PArdon you like to screw oses? Now thats a fetish i havent heard of.

      --

      Tragek

    2. Re:Heh! by Shriek · · Score: 0
      MenuetOS looks like some weird screwy version of BeOS! (I have a fetish for this kind of OS.)


      Man, only a geek would say they have a fetish for some piece of software.
  2. OmG by sekzscripting · · Score: 4, Funny
    O.M.G.

    Free Food?!!111

    1. Re:OmG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that free as in speech, or free as in beer?

    2. Re:OmG by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Free as in beer. Talking with your mouth full is not permited.

    3. Re:OmG by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you are a pink squid-man? ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  3. Menuet OS Development. by General+Sherman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Menuet OS sounds interesting. I'm wondering however if it will ever grow into a fully fledged OS written entirely in assembly. If it does, well, zoom. That'll be one of the fastest OS's on the market easily.

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Menuet OS Development. by BelugaParty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, it sounds very interesting. It could do to OS's what early versions of Opera did for web browsing. However, with my limited computer knowledge, doesn't writing in assembler require a lot of knowledge about the computers underlying hardware? Would developers need to write in assembler as well, just to develop for it?

      anyway, sounds like a project worth following. but it might just be my youthful idealism.

    2. Re:Menuet OS Development. by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      you wouldn't need to write in assembly to develope for it. though the compilers for other languages would have to be written in assembly language at first.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    3. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      doesn't writing in assembler require a lot of knowledge about the computers underlying hardware?

      Yes. Assembler is about as low level programming you can get without writing the hex code yourself. However, you still need to understand all the ops of a CPU and hardware interfaces when developing an OS, so it really isn't a big deal. (i.e. If you don't know what the LGDT instruction does, you won't be writing an OS any time soon.)

      Would developers need to write in assembler as well, just to develop for it?

      Nope. It's the job of a compiler to reduce the code into machine language. (Assembly is just a textual representation of machine language.) It's the job of a linker to produce binary "wrapper" files for machine code that tells the OS how to link the file in memory. Go look up the ELF (Executable and Linking Format) for a good example.

      BTW, a tip for you. You can order bound manuals for the Pentium I/II/III/4 directly from Intel's website AT NO COST. Apparently, this is a result of their deal with the justice department to resolve possible anti-trust charges. They take a month or two to get, but they are nice manuals with plenty of detail.

    4. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll be one of the fastest OS's on the market easily

      Not necessarily true. I mean, this box has 96% CPU idle as I type, and I have a load of crap loaded and running in the background. It isn't going to get much faster if the OS were written in assembler. The stuff that takes time is pulling data off disk, shuffling memory around, loading apps & resources, managing devices & I/O and handling processes. Anything else is largely the application's fault or a reflection on the OS's API design.

      Anyway - as someone who once built a dinky little OS / window manager in 68k assembler - what I'm trying to say is: the algorithms and design is more important than the language for building an OS. A super design in C / Pascal / intepreted Python / anything else is going to be faster than a very poor design in assembler. And the higher level languages make more organised designs easier to manage and implement, plus they're less error-prone.

      While Menuet might be an impressive achievement, I'm not sure assembler is an appropriate language for coding an entire modern OS of any significance outside of embedded use (for hardware-specific / performance critical pieces, sure - but assembler for everything is probably overkill.) It's already sort of obsolete with AMD's movement to IA-64 - it's going to be major work to port all that assembler to 64-bit code.

      Just my 2 cents.

    5. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Detritus · · Score: 1

      You can bootstrap the compiler on another system that already has a running compiler. You then cross-compile the compiler to the target system. If the only difference between systems is the operating system, you can just port the startup code and libraries to the target system.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:Menuet OS Development. by sproket · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily. Everybody assumes that assembly makes the fastest programs. The reality is that optimizing C compilers can produce faster code than most programmers. Even among those who have knowledge to write faster assembly, the sheer time involved can make it unworthwhile to do something optimally. After writing something at a snail's pace for days, the developer often says to himself: I'll come back later and code this up as a binary tree, for now I'm just going to use a linear search and get it done.

    7. Re:Menuet OS Development. by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      Is there a link to the intel page where you can order these?

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    8. Re:Menuet OS Development. by t · · Score: 1
      BTW, a tip for you. You can order bound manuals for the Pentium I/II/III/4 directly from Intel's website AT NO COST. Apparently, this is a result of their deal with the justice department to resolve possible anti-trust charges. They take a month or two to get, but they are nice manuals with plenty of detail.
      What did they use to cost? But anyway, you can also go to the Motorola website and get free manuals shipped to you for the PPC.
    9. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Apparently, this is a result of their deal with the justice department to resolve possible anti-trust charges.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    10. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      That'll be one of the fastest OS's on the market easily.

      I doubt that hand-coded assembly is going to be noticably different from compiler generated assembly. Compilers these day do a pretty good job of optimizing.

      But yes, compared to Winbloat, it will most probably zoom!

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    11. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      I've tried Menuet in the past. The only thing that would keep it from being great is that every program can access all the memory available to the system. This means one bad app can crash the system (Win3.1 anyone?). Maybe that has changed in recent months though.

    12. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Stormie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reality is that optimizing C compilers can produce faster code than most programmers

      Yes, but "most programmers" don't sit down to write an OS in assembly. Optimizing C compilers most certainly do not produce faster code than a true kick-ass assembly guru, and I assume that's the sort of person who would take on a project like this.

      After writing something at a snail's pace for days, the developer often says to himself: I'll come back later and code this up as a binary tree, for now I'm just going to use a linear search and get it done.

      On that front, however, you may well be correct. Writing something in "100% asm" is almost certainly more about ego than performance. One adage which actually is true is the old "10% of the code takes 90% of the CPU time" one, so write it, profile it, and then rewrite the critical bits in assembly.

    13. Re:Menuet OS Development. by register_ax · · Score: 1
      BTW, a tip for you. You can order bound manuals for the Pentium I/II/III/4 directly from Intel's website AT NO COST. Apparently, this is a result of their deal with the justice department to resolve possible anti-trust charges. They take a month or two to get, but they are nice manuals with plenty of detail.

      PUUHHleeasse. Why bother with Intel when AMD offers the same deal? Quit obscuring the truth!!! Surely any company who can deliver a superior, innovative, reliable product has something to hide!

      I'm not buying it...

      p.s. If you must belong to the dark side, follow along with that other sheep.

    14. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Cheeziologist · · Score: 1

      BTW, a tip for you. You can order bound manuals for the Pentium I/II/III/4 directly from Intel's website AT NO COST. Apparently, this is a result of their deal with the justice department to resolve possible anti-trust charges. They take a month or two to get, but they are nice manuals with plenty of detail.

      That is a very cool and good piece of information to know that I didn't know. I just ordered my manuals a few minutes ago. Thanks for the info!

    15. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Nice job on repeating me there. Too bad you need to learn more history.

      It's pretty cool that Motorola provides free bound manuals. Sun also provides full information on their SPARC design. Sadly, I think they charge for bound manuals. :-(

    16. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Um. Sure. Not that AMD sees they have to compete with Intel or anything, right? Nor that 90% of their chips are (quite literally) cheap Intel knockoffs? Although, they are cheap in a good way...

      Geez, you try to help a guy out and all of Slashdot attacks. Remind me to stay home next time.

    17. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info!

      No problem! :-)

    18. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      While I was happy being able to get my hands on IA-32 manuals for free, the fact that I can also get x86-64 manuals has made my night indeed. Thanks. :)

    19. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he didn't realize that Intel, AMD, and VIA chips all use IA-32? And not all of Slashdot is attacking you. Hell, about now, you're my hero. :)

    20. Re:Menuet OS Development. by register_ax · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to kick you. It was supposed to be more of a goof then anything. I was hoping people would realize that AMD was nothing more then a knockoff and quietly subverting the masses to the prowess of Intel. Their innovations are truly captivating whereas AMD gives best bang/buck. I realize it's all ia32 arch so I guess it was kind of stupid of me to post that. It is interesting AMD is offering a book on their new AMD Athlon XP 64.

      In summary, it was quiet subversion and a chance to double the freebies! ;)

    21. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Hell, about now, you're my hero. :)

      Well, that's something I guess. Now all I need is a way to make money off of these posts! Oh wait, I guess that's what my .sig is for... ;-)

    22. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Oh, all right. I guess I'll let you off the hook... this time. ;-)

    23. Re:Menuet OS Development. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Oops. Never mind. I just realized what you were trying to say. I originally thought that you were parroting me in regards to Motorola. Now I realize you were responding to the parent post with the correct answer. My mistake. :P

    24. Re:Menuet OS Development. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      That'll be one of the fastest OS's on the market easily.

      Might not be fast in terms of "time to market", though. :/

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    25. Re:Menuet OS Development. by Azog · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, an assembly guru can write kick-ass optimized code for a specific CPU - but that's why assembly sucks.

      You can hand-tune your assembly to be the fastest possible on the i586 with it's 32 K of icache and 32 K of dcache (iirc), but what will you do when you want to run it on a i686 or Athlon with different instruction timings, different cache architectures, and different bus and memory speeds? Suddenly your hand-tuned assembly isn't so optimal anymore. You have to get out a whole other set of CPU reference manuals, recalculate all your instruction timings and loop sizes, and recode it all. Basically redo all your optimizations from the start. You will probably need to change the level of loop unrolling and function inlining you do, so the rewriting required is non-trivial.

      But if you write in C, you just switch the optimization flags and recompile. It may not be 100% optimal for any one architecture, but you can get pretty darn good optimization for a whole lot of architectures with one set of source code.

      Also, remember that in most computer programs, 90% of the runtime is in about 10% of the code. So even if you're a hard-core assembler guru, you'd be much better off writing hand-optimized routines for the 10% of the code that actually matters, and leave the rest to the C compiler.

      Writing everything in assembly is stupid. Really!

      (Well, it's kind of cool in a geeky sort of way, like building your own 16-bit computer from chips, wire, and solder is cool, ... but it isn't very productive, and it isn't even optimal unless you're willing to rewrite everything for every sub-architecture your code is ever going to run on.)

      Just don't assume that assembler (even hand tuned) == fast.

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    26. Re:Menuet OS Development. by jafuser · · Score: 1

      And if you're especially masochistic...

      Authoring Windows Applications In Assembly Language

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  4. The largest gathering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I've never heard geeks classified in such a manner. Maybe this could be a major breakthrough! Do I smell the kingdom geekus coming or is that just another tabletopgamerasourous?

  5. Mandrake and the community by Telex4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's good news about Mandrake, and it's good to see that some of their financial success is coming from community support (i.e. the club). It'd be interesting to get a breakdown of figures to see how much they rely on it.

    Mandrake have put so much back into the community that it'd be fitting for the community to then help keep them afloat. It'd be a short-term disaster if they went under.

    1. Re:Mandrake and the community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do the bisexual african americans use?

  6. Linux Counter. by eddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm #85934. I think I saw that Slackware reminder to register a thousand times (certainly three different installs) until I finally gave in and registered.

    Too bad, for some weird reason I really wonder how low a # I'd gotten if I'd registered ASAP

    Oh, well. At least I got #24 of 1283 in the 2.4 kernel pool. But I truly digress

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Linux Counter. by torpor · · Score: 1

      What took you so long with Chips and Dips?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  7. Ramifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ramifications will this have in the consumer marketplace?

    1. Re:Ramifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "this" being?

    2. Re:Ramifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good question: My guess is we'll see nothing in the short term, but some major upheaval as the long term effects of what's happened come into play. Remember that this will take a while to fully sink in.

      I'd say, keep watching: We should know by the Winter of this year.

  8. I'm impressed by MenuetOS. by James+A.+A.+Joyce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I notice that like a lot of assembler OSes it doesn't seem too modular. (That's fine, though, considering that it's just 70K!) All the utilities which are needed are builtin. Which brings me to the question I wish to ask for any who are more informed than I?

    Is there a simple way of interfacing with the GUI to produce dialog boxes and the like from a simple shell? I'm thinking of something like xdialog or gdialog in UNIX/Linux systems with X/GNOME installed.

  9. Guess they over-estimated Scotty's value... by Thornae · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reserve price of US$40K on a complete TOS uniform for Scotty wasn't met.

    Anyone got any obvious jokes about the fact that it's a RED uniform?

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
    1. Re:Guess they over-estimated Scotty's value... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I'll bite.

      Maybe when people tried to bid on it, it went something like:

      "I wan't to bid on some TOS stuff. Oh, what's this uniform over heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer!"

      Never heard from again.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Guess they over-estimated Scotty's value... by The+Munger · · Score: 1

      Why did Scotty wear a red uniform?

      To keep his trousers up.

      Thank you, thank you. I can hear the groans already.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
  10. Nice advert by Faust7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Menuet, the 100 % assembly OS,

    As opposed to those languages that aren't assembly in some form... :-)

    1. Re:Nice advert by SubjunctiveSam · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your point.

  11. Video Capture by flacco · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'd love to see a start-to-finish Video Capture and Clean-up article for LINUX.

    I have an ATI Radeon 8500 All-In-Wonder rotting away in my machine, and some Hi-8 tapes that I'd like to digitize... :-(

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:Video Capture by Gherald · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, as soon as I come across a good HOWTO article I will buy a Winfast TV2000XP

      Unless you are building a mini HTPC type system, I think AIW is pointless. Much better to have a vanilla AGP card that can be upgraded at any time.

    2. Re:Video Capture by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I have a Matrox Marvel G200 which captures in Motion JPEG (avi) format using "lavrec", part of the "MJPEG tools" suite. Also included are filtering and deinterlacing tools and a good tutorial. Filtering speed is a little faster than 1 frame per second (720X480) and MPEG creation is about the same rate (500MHz PIII). If there is an adequate driver for your All-In-Wonder you ought to be able to use the MJPEG-tools. Reading the source code is educational.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Video Capture by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I have an ATI Radeon 8500 All-In-Wonder rotting away in my machine

      As do I.

      Tell me... What's it feel like to know you spent hundreds of dollars on a card that can't do TV-out under anything but Windows, and getting Linux TV-in with sound to work requires the sacrifice of a virgin to the computer gods.

      Oh yeah, that whole processor off-loading of video processing... forget about it.

      Man am I glad I spent a load of money on a card that has such great support... Hell, aeven under Windows their software sucks. I couldn't schedule recording because the damn thing would crash when recording time came. This is after I spent hourse getting the software to install, reinstall, and stop conflicting with everything else in the system, and finally got TV-viewing working.

      I'm not much of a fan of NVidia hardware, or binary drivers, but dammed if it doesn't just work perfectly out of the box.

      For anyone thinking of a multimedia box, get a seperate videocard and capture card... You'll save a load of money, get exactly the features you want, and you'll even have something that will work under just about any OS.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Video Capture by Laplace · · Score: 1

      ... and getting Linux TV-in with sound to work requires the sacrifice of a virgin to the computer gods.

      You idiot. Have sex with the virgin first, then sacrifice her to the gods.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    5. Re:Video Capture by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Why that card?

      The KWORLD TV787RF-Pro I bought is $40 at newegg, comes with a remote (can't say if it works with LIRC yet) tunes in FM, and I know from experience that it completely ignores Macrovision (That's right, you can actually make legal copies with decent quality now, try not to hyperventilate as you realize your rights).

      I think AIW is pointless.

      That is putting it very nicely... See my reply to the parent.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Video Capture by topham · · Score: 1

      AIW is useless anyway. If you want to record video it's much better to go with an mpeg2 capable card.

      AIW relies way too much on CPU power; which means you can readily drop frames if you actually use it for anything while it's working. Useless.

    7. Re:Video Capture by bahamat · · Score: 1

      apt-get install cinepaint dv-utils kino transcode vcr

      Cinelerra
      Video Capture and Editing under Linux
      Consumer Video Editing in Linux
      Linux Tutorial: Video, DVD, TV and Multimedia

      Now let's all repeat after me...
      Google is my friend.

      Seriously, are you people just to lazy to type 3 frickin words into Google?

    8. Re:Video Capture by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Like I said, only usefull for a mini HTPC type system.

  12. Interesting Mandrake quip by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My buddy lost his nice tech job at a bank and has been running the PC upgrade and repair shop at the local CompUSA (for about 50% the pay, but hell, beats unemployment). Anyways, sales of Mandrake Linux constently beat Red Hat right up until Red Hat 8 was shipped. And all together Suse, Red Hat, and Mandrake has actually sold more then Windows XP since XP's release. Only the Windows XP upgrade and Office XP has sold more copies then the Big 3 of Linux.

    I thought you might find that interesting.

    1. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by mopslik · · Score: 1

      And all together Suse, Red Hat, and Mandrake has actually sold more then Windows XP since XP's release.

      Might that have something to do with the fact that around 90% of PCs ship with WinXP pre-installed?

    2. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by The+Munger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Surely the fact that most PCs come bundled with a Windows OS would influence those numbers greatly. Not many 'real people' upgrade their version of windows unless they're buying a new computer or a geek friend upgrades it for them to run the latest whiz-bang software. And that geek isn't going to fork out for it.

      It's telling that the XP upgrade CD outsells the Big 3. It shows that Windows is still the OS that these 'real people' want on their machines.

      It is good to see people willing to fork out the cash to support the cause though.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    3. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by natmsincome.com · · Score: 1

      What it does mean through is that Linux "Sales" in his store are higher than Windows Sales.

      If you went to a number of other stores you might get the same data as well.

      Pool all that data together and you realise that Linux has more sales the XP since the upgrades don't count since they are going from one windows to another.

      When you look at this it's obvious that the facts are wrong but this is what microsoft does. Here's some of the tricks that are used to manipulate the stats.

      *Sell copies of Windows XP but let the customer downgrade to Windows 2000. XP has rapid adoption because people can't buy anything else.

      *Count copies that haven't been sold. They count the copies they ship not that customer buy.[1] This means that the computeron display + others that haven't been sold are counted as a sale.

      *Display sales are if it was mindshare. This is bad for Mac's as while PC's are have an upgrad cycle of 3 years Mac's upgrade cycle is about 5 years. So Sales stats are about 95% Windows 2% Mac + 3% others while the real mindshare (Computers being used) is more like 91% Windows 4% Mac and 5% others.

      [1] This isn't exactly true but is easier for most people to understand.

    4. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by The+Munger · · Score: 1

      I think your conclusions are incorrect. While on face value it may seem like Linux is outselling Windows, we all know that isn't true. A large portion of the Windows sales may be bundled versions with computers.

      Upgrade CDs do count. Some of the people buying Redhat 8, probably bought Redhat 7 as well. In fact, I would suggest that a large portion of those Linux buyers are repeat customers. Let's face it - if you can't afford the download for one major release, you're probably in the same boat the next time around. So you do have to take into account that these full purchases may be upgrades. In which case, XP upgrades also matter.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    5. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "than"

    6. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by Tihstae · · Score: 1

      And all together Suse, Red Hat, and Mandrake has actually sold more then Windows XP since XP's release.

      I call Bullshit!

      I know this is /. and facts don't really matter, but this statement is absolutely ludicrous.

    7. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by evilviper · · Score: 1
      all together Suse, Red Hat, and Mandrake has actually sold more then Windows XP since XP's release.

      Careful... Corporate America may be listening...

      Microsoft: Today we have decided to join the RIAA in their fight against Piracy. Clearly, the fact that Linux has sold more than Windows XP is incontrovertable proof that rampant Piracy is going on.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by fearlessrogue · · Score: 1

      Tell me that you do not know someone that has pirated xp. I call dumbass.

      --

      Everything Zen;
      Everything Zen;
      I don't think so!!!
    9. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Tell me that you do not know someone that has pirated xp.

      That's true actually. Everyone I know is still downloading and copying Windows 2000 because XP is so incredibly awful.

      Nobody wants to wait 2 minutes between clicking on the menu, and having it pop-up... It's just craptactular, needless wasted CPU cycles that Microsoft is famous for, but with XP, they took it much too far.

      Personally, I still use NT4 (I'm 100% legal BTW)... USB support and DirectX > 5 isn't worth it, if it requires you to have a slow-ass system, that is less stable, less secure, and more difficult to work with, manage, and maintain.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Interesting Mandrake quip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God, the craptacular start menu in XP just gives me a headache looking at it, and I'm using "Whats Organsation?" KDE at the moment..

  13. Free Food by Gherald · · Score: 5, Funny

    Free Food?!!111

    Yes, it is true. You can distribute it to whoever you want in both Original and Digested form, and are allowed to charge a modest distribution fee for this service.

    However, if you choose to distribute the food in Digested form, you must also make the Original availeable to the public.

    1. Re:Free Food by cthugha · · Score: 1

      Given the viral nature of Free Food (i.e. "You are what you eat"), the consumption of this food could result in you being required to give Free Food to every person you meet (since physical proximity to another person could be interpreted as a "distribution"). I would therefore advise against the widespread commercial adoption of Free Food.

    2. Re:Free Food by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is true. You can distribute it to whoever you want in both Original and Digested form, and are allowed to charge a modest distribution fee for this service.

      Not so fast. KFC has claimed that one of their secret herbs and spices was used in the preparation of the food at this picnic, and so you will need to pay their family meal price for every plate that you eat. They won't tell you which spice it is, so the picnic organizers can't change their recipes, but they have mentioned owning "pepper" and "paprika", despite having never actually grown any herbs themselves.

      Die SCO, die. Spare us from all the lame jokes...

      Don't get your hopes up.

    3. Re:Free Food by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      Given the viral nature of Free Food (i.e. "You are what you eat"), the consumption of this food could result in you being required to give Free Food to every person you meet (since physical proximity to another person could be interpreted as a "distribution"). I would therefore advise against the widespread commercial adoption of Free Food.

      However, if you are Darl McBride, then you are allowed to consume free food, distribute free food for a while, then demand $699 for every piece of free food ever distributed (but $32 if the free food is embedded (like the hot dog inside the bun))

  14. Rock on by mao+che+minh · · Score: 0

    good stuff

  15. Overestimated a lot, actually. by Thornae · · Score: 1

    Scotty's formal uniform didn't do any better.

    Neither did a whole bunch of other cool
    stuff .
    What, doesn't anyone want to pay $8000 to dress up as Imperious Leader?

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
    1. Re:Overestimated a lot, actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that coffin is friggin cool. 7 ft long! would be great for making out with the chiquitas while watching POTA

  16. What? I'm being serious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can make dialog boxes from a noninteractive shell program on a Linux box if you have GNOME (or even X) installed. If you have X installed, just type "dialog" at your shell prompt.

  17. RJJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roy Jones is fighting Corrie Sanders!!!

  18. video capture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To see how the pros do it check out the products from Digital Rapids.

    http://www.digital-rapids.com

    here is a link to their video processing, all hardware pre-processing with amazing results in real-time.

    http://www.digital-rapids.com/Products_DemoRoom. ht ml

    We are using some of these boards for our digital dailies at the post house and they are amazing, sadly enough however, no linux drivers yet.

  19. Beam me up, Scotty! by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Jeez, it doesn't even come with any real documentation or provenance. Just some laundry marks that might have been made by the Desilu props department. Or not.

    You'll note that the rank stripes are for a Lieutenant J.G., though by the end of TOS Scotty jumped up to Lieutenant Commander. Roddenberry explained this with some silly story about giving the actors promotions instead of raises. But I suspect that he really had no idea what the stripes meant. A lot more of Star Trek was invented by other people than members of the Church of St. Gene will admit.

  20. Big Name Pistol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, So i guess its alright for movie pistols to be sold on ebay and not my pistols.

    1. Re:Big Name Pistol by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Feel free to sell any rubber pistols there.

  21. Sean Young's Haircut by aSiTiC · · Score: 1
    That Bladerunner would be my second choice, any auction going on Sean Young's haircut??

    What's it called? Parting of the Waves?

  22. Lawsuit Fest by didjit · · Score: 4, Funny

    That picnic could be a good place for SCO lawyers to deliver legal papers to violators of their copyright. Anyone in attendance running Linux, wearing a Linux related T-Shirt, etc could get sued.

    1. Re:Lawsuit Fest by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Anyone in attendance running Linux, wearing a Linux related T-Shirt, etc could get sued.

      Yeah, but just imagine what would happen to any SCO lawyer that shows up.

      I'd rather get sued. It would be far less unpleasant.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Where? by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    BTW, a tip for you. You can order bound manuals for the Pentium I/II/III/4 directly from Intel's website AT NO COST.

    Gotta pointer to specifically where on their site to get them? Thanks!

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  24. OMG LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was no carpet munching at the Linux picnic, except by the females there. The males seemed to prefer the tube steak.

    Oh wait, that was the Mac picnic.

    No, no. It was the Linux picnic.

  25. WTF is all this shiite ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep the topics to one pleeze.

    1. Re:WTF is all this shiite ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a slashback!

      and you are an uneducated fool

    2. Re:WTF is all this shiite ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before calling someone else an uneducated fool, please try to make sure you're not one yourself.

      Note that "its" is the possessive form of "it" and "it's" is the contraction of "it is." Also note that sentences should start with capital letters and end with a period, exclamation point or question mark.

  26. Linux Counter by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not to be mister negative but...
    Being that slashdot is pro-Linux. You think the editors would have been nice enough to give Linux counter its own Article instead of being buried in a slashback. The Counter wasn't even mentioned on the main page.

  27. Re:The 100 % assembly OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, they're 100% machine code when you run then.

    They're assembly until the assembler assembles them into machine code.

  28. Manuals are here... by ashitaka · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh god, I'm SUCH a karma whore...

    Pentium manuals in download or dead-tree form.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Manuals are here... by ashkar · · Score: 1

      Thanks, whore.

      I will now have 4 more books in my library.

    2. Re:Manuals are here... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Wow, this is awesome. I've been looking for something similar to this, and the fact that I can get it for free makes it all the better. I have no modpoints to shower you with, so a sincere thank you will have to do. :)

    3. Re:Manuals are here... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      While both you and I are appreciative, I'm sure Intel is cursing his name right about now. While only 2 people have posted about ordering them, I think it'd be rather amusing to see a graph of requests for the past month so we could see a nice little spike in requests thanks to Slashdot. And they thought it sucked when their servers get Slashdotted. :)

    4. Re:Manuals are here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha I ordered not only a set for me, but one for all my friends! I hate trees.

    5. Re:Manuals are here... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Oh god, I'm SUCH a karma whore...

      Pentium manuals in download or dead-tree form.

      I had printed out the PDFs a while back (at work, thankfully, not at home) and had them bound, but the binder fscked up...the larger volumes were split into two or three parts, and I think one of them was bound on the wrong edge. Now I can get properly-bound editions for free...w00t!

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Manuals are here... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Well, gee, it's not like their hard to find on Intel's site or anything. I just searched on "Pentium Manual" and found Intel has tons of free developer resources.

      The more free stuff you give to developers, the more developers develop for your hardware. The more developers developing for your hardware, the more people using your product.

      Developers, developers!, DEVELOPERS!!!

      Someone stop me before I start bouncing around the room!!

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  29. Yes, free food! by ikluft · · Score: 1

    Please RSVP if you can attend so we can estimate the amount of food needed.

  30. Beware of viral effects! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    If you take somebody else food and combine it with food of your own you could get a nasty case of gastro.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  31. Please RSVP for the picnic if you'll attend by ikluft · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you'll be at the Linux Picnic, please RSVP so that we can estimate how much food to bring.

    As the posting says, there is no fee to attend. The costs of this year's picnic have been picked up by Oracle.

    And a bit of trivia: the Sunnyvale Baylands Park where the picnic is held is also one of the sites where filming took place for Revolution OS. For anyone who's interested, we can show you the boardwalk area where the interviews with Michael Tiemann of Cygnus (now CTO of RedHat) took place.

    1. Re:Please RSVP for the picnic if you'll attend by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1
      Please Repondez, S'il Vous Plait
      RSVP stands for please respond, so when you say Please RSVP it means "Please Respond Please." I hate to be a nitpick and don't mean to be a jerk, but this is something I hear all the time that kinda irks me! And if you don't do it for me, remember, it's one less thing for those damn Frenchies to ridicule us about (the mis-use of their language)
    2. Re:Please RSVP for the picnic if you'll attend by ikluft · · Score: 1
      Je comprends. (French for "I understand.")

      However, get used to it. In English any word can be verbed. :-)

  32. No. by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    They're 100% machine language. As in, they're patterns of charged and discharged capacitors in RAM, as well as patterns of current flow in the CPU.

    So don't quibble.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  33. George Reeves? by quinkin · · Score: 1
    George Reeves???

    His name was Christopher last I looked...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:George Reeves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Reeves the real Superman!

    2. Re:George Reeves? by absurder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhhh.. George Reeves played Superman on TV in the 50's.

    3. Re:George Reeves? by bsartist · · Score: 1

      His name was Christopher last I looked...

      Look again. ;-)

      Christopher Reeve (no "s") starred in several cheesy Superman movies in the 70's and 80's. George Reeves starred in a cheesy Superman TV series in the 50's.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    4. Re:George Reeves? by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the fifties, there was a Superman live action TV series. An actor named George Reeves played Superman. In the late seventies and through the eighties Christopher Reeve (no "s") played Superman in a series of three movies. Let us not speak of IV, it scared my psyche so badly that I deny it ever happened to this day. We're talking big budget MST3K fodder.

      That the two actors names are almost identical is a coincidence.

    5. Re:George Reeves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were they able to wash the blood out?

    6. Re:George Reeves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That the two actors names are almost identical is a coincidence.


      Or is it?
  34. Buymusic.com by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    For those who responded to this post, I will be getting a box full of CDs this weekend and will start sending them out - thanks to all who emailed me about getting a CD, the response was fantastic!

    In other news, we are talking with a lawyer and hope to have some news soon about our status on buymusic.com.

    After some homework, we did *not* sign anything with 'The Orchard'. We had our CDs manufactured by a company called 'Oasis', and agreed for a song to be put on a sampler. That's it.

    'The Orchard' and buymusic.com are blatantly violating copyright in the worst way (selling the infrigements).

    Personally, I don't care if this CD is on p2p (I plan to make files available after this is taken care of), but when someone charges for these songs without our knowledge and pockets the proceeds, that is not cool.

    Thanks again for all those who emailed for a CD and to chat about it, many more are available, so feel free to contact me and buy one ($5+shipping) if you like the samples.

    1. Re:Buymusic.com by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I'm curious, I don't really know all the details so bare with me here. Did they actually sell any copies of your CD and make money off of it? Or was it just offered up? If they did make money off of it, are you going to be getting any money out of them? Perhaps you should sue them for 90 billion just like the RIAA ;)

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Buymusic.com by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      I don't know if buymusic did; I know some others did.

      I don't know if they are liable for any $$$ as of yet, but if they are I'd love to see the RIAA put up a paypal donation link after we drain their life savings. ;)

      Of course, I won't be posting here anymore because I'll be on an island in the South Seas drinking rum.

      We'll see... :)

  35. I bought Erin Gray's spandex at the auction... by winkydink · · Score: 1

    nobody told me that they were gonna wash them... :(

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  36. I for one... by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

    I for one will welcome our assembly-optimized overlords!

  37. To digitize Hi8 tapes by ouija147 · · Score: 1

    Buy a firewire card. Borrow a DV camcorder that supports capturing video from an analog input. Then connect the analog out from your Hi8 to the analog input of the DV cam. Record the signal from the Hi8 cam onto the DV tape. Then output the captured DV footage via firewire.

    This may seem like it would take more time than it would to directly capture the video via the AIW, but having experienced all the hassles of analog capture via an AIW--dropped frames, and a myriad of other problems--this has worked out best and fastest for me. YMMV

    1. Re:To digitize Hi8 tapes by flacco · · Score: 1

      actually, i've been thinking about getting a dvc, but have no idea which one to buy... any recommendations for one that works well with linux? or comprehensive buyer's guides?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    2. Re:To digitize Hi8 tapes by mink · · Score: 1

      Get the ADVC-100 from Canopus.
      Great little box that can take any signal, digital or analog.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  38. It's people like you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that got our spoonless Ted into all that trouble with agent Smith.

  39. The big question here is... by blkros · · Score: 1

    Why does anyone care what's happening on BuyMusic.com, since you can't even get into it on Linux. (Or any Apple OS, or even on Windows, unless you're using IE 5.0+). I haven't been back since I found that out on my 1st visit--using Mozilla.

    --
    Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
    1. Re:The big question here is... by mblase · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone care what's happening on BuyMusic.com, since you can't even get into it on Linux.

      (1) This may astonish you, but a large percentage of Slashdot's readership doesn't use Linux on a daily basis. And many of those who do still have access to Windows and Internet Explorer.

      (2) This Slashback about BuyMusic began as a copyright issue, with the store acquiring lots of artists' music from a third party without ever compensating the original artists, or even checking to see if they had permission to use their work. A big YRO story there.

    2. Re:The big question here is... by blkros · · Score: 1

      While I understand that, and I understand that BuyMusic is infringing copyright left and right (pun intended), my point is that this is just one issue with the site/company.
      It's obvious that the company doesn't care about the users or the artists, but only about making money.
      I actually emailed support when I found that you couldn't get on the site without IE 5 + (on windows) and have yet to hear from them (3 or more weeks later).

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
  40. Matching hardware to actual needs is not crazytalk by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Indian: Thats crazytalk
    Lisa S.: No, it's true.
    Indian: No, thats my brother, Crazy Talk.

  41. Auction Winner by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    The live auction mentioned earlier in the week is over...

    I bought an early model of Anonymous Coward, used as a prop in a segment which was cut from "Hackers". It seems to sometimes be useful, although I don't expect to get much recognition with it.

  42. That's funny by fm6 · · Score: 1
    The same company claims to have gotten for things like a chair from the set, and a piece of bridge railing.

    Wait a minute. I seem to recall that the set from TOS was acquired by the Smithsonian! I smell a con.

  43. But Remember! by jstockdale · · Score: 1

    Its free as in beer not free as in speech ... erm ... or ... speech not beer ... or ...

    I confused myself.

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  44. i'm slightly peeved by sniggly · · Score: 1
    [peeve mode on]
    I submitted this story the other day, no other than infoworld has it that mandrake's enterprise edition beats redhats, suses and turbolinux' enterprise editons.

    Didn't get placed. Is it just me who thinks that mandrake only is news for the slashdot editors when they have financial reports, or when the words mandrake and bankrupcy are found in the same sentence?

    I bet Mandrake is still the number one distribution measured in both install base and ease of use. It certainly has been number one over the last few years. Now Infoworld claims theyre the top enterprise linux as well. Slashdot's editor pretty much like any other publication seems to wants to see Linux as a battle between RedHat & Suse with the real geeks using debian or gentoo. Maybe its part of this silly punish the French campaign?

    gah!

    [peeve mode off (not really)]

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  45. Re:We've slashdotted their dead tree dept (nt) by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    Jonah Hex

  46. Thanks Jody, but what about... by sh00z · · Score: 1

    ...everybody else that Orchard is still infringing against by leaving their stuff on BuyMusic? Have you gotten assurances from them that they're looking at the *rest* of the catalogue for trouble spots, or are they just sitting around waiting for squeaky wheels like you?

  47. Orchard's contract by axlrosen · · Score: 1

    I'm confused... "It seems they had kept me in their catalog on a contract clause that had been overlooked when the contract was signed back in 1999." Overlooked by who, you or them? I interpret this as meaning that you were under contract with them but didn't know it, so they did have the right to sell your music, but then they graciously terminated the contract when you asked them to. Is this right?

  48. Assembly highly overrated! by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    Writing stuff in assembly is extremely overrated.

    Many optimizations that compilers can do, like inlining, software pipelining, and loop unrolling are often difficult to do by hand, and at best result in assembly code that is a nightmare to maintain. (Before you jump up and tell me that macro assemblers make inlining easy, well, it's not true. They make cut-and-paste easy, but to really do inlining you need to optimize the pasted code in its new context, which means register-allocating the surrounding region with the code there; removing dead branches, etc.) Other optimizations are just so tedious (register allocation) that nobody could bear to do them constantly by hand while writing code. Instead, they resort to macros, calling conventions, and global variables -- so that their code ends up looking like the output of a non-optimizing C compiler. (Just search for a win32 assembly tutorial, you'll see what I mean.)

    Assembly does have its advantages, in two ways: Most compilers are optimized for speed, not space. Assembly programs usually come out to be much smaller than C programs (some of this has to do with linker stupidity). For embedded devices where you can count the bytes available on a few thousand hands, writing in assembly is sensible. Second, fine-tuning an inner loop or two in assembly is sometimes necessary to get the best possible performance. But just writing it in assembly will not get you the performance benefit; you also need to hand-optimize it like crazy, and only a few kinds of routines are amenable to this kind of thing. In any case, these are both "small scale" projects.

    I'm no fan of C, but writing a "fully fledged OS" (ie, for the PC) in assembly is retarded. It will be impossible to maintain and debug, subject to security holes like crazy, and probably won't be faster than an operating system written in a programming language because it becomes more and more difficult to use clever algorithms when you use lower and lower level methods. Clever algorithms are where the real performance gains are.

  49. Re:We've slashdotted their dead tree dept (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont you belong in that article about comic books and obscenity.