Slashdot Mirror


Walk-thru Fog Screen

fluor2 writes "Ever wanted a screen floating in air? Two scientists, Ismo Rakkolainen and Karri Palovuori, both from Tampere University of Technology, Finland have come up with an idea. It is called the Walk-thru Fog Screen. The fog screen, consisting of 'fog' that is blown down from top, and the protective laminar airflow creates a thin and crisp surface, pretty undisturbed by the air in the rest of the room, making it ideal for projector usage. People can walk right through this screen of fog. Their next idea is to use the fog as a touch-screen, making it even more accessible." For a screen one can walk through, the image quality is better than I'd have thought.

75 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. hmmm by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 5, Funny

    is this what they call vapor-ware ?

    S

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    1. Re:hmmm by shfted! · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but it would be the perfect display for playing Myst...

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah ah, just what Darl Mc Bride needed: a fog screen to present SCO stuff...

    3. Re:hmmm by moinefou · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cool, then you should hear the sound of the Long-Horn trough the the fog-screen

    4. Re:hmmm by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Wonder if you could freeze the fog to make it into a solid screen...

      Umm, no, it would make snow.

  2. Great.. now I'd like to by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

    walk through my Blue Screen of Death!

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and into another dimension, where the stable version of windows actually exists...

  3. Seaquest DSV by Microlith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So will this be installed with a "Wise Old Man" Genuine People Personality in the Captain's quarters of future naval ships?

    Will we see giant submarines in the future that go into space and...

    Err, sorry. Got sidetracked.

    This is cool. In a 1996 sorta way.

    1. Re:Seaquest DSV by Alranor · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Genuine People Personality software is patented by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so i'd be careful that they don't sue :)

    2. Re:Seaquest DSV by zebs · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Genuine People Personality software is patented by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so i'd be careful that they don't sue :)

      Don't you mean Sirius Cybernetics cOrporation?

    3. Re:Seaquest DSV by Alranor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, a fairly famous book once described the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as 'a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes' , that does sound like a reasonable description of SCO :)

  4. Johnny by joshua.robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get out of the screen what do you think you are? Made out ouf Glass?

    --
    Whats A sig anyway
  5. repost.... by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Informative
    either I mistakenly set my sys clock back to last year or this is a repost.

    My god slashdot!! Can't you keep your stories straight?? If not SEARCH GOOGLE!!. That's how I found it again.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:repost.... by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right...
      However the story was new to me. So I am not too upset.

      --ken

      --
      Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    2. Re:repost.... by GothChip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even the comments are the same...

  6. It would make for a great cinema effect by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I am not really sure what display use it has in the "real world" but it would make a great cinematic effect.

    Also you could scare folks in amusement park rides making them think they are about to crash into stuff.

    You could also hide behind it and spy on people maybe...

    Who knows...

    --ken

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    1. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by dmeranda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the real world, fog screens tend to make terrible pileups on the highways where the crashes aren't so pretend.

      As far as amusement parks, good luck trying to keep a laminar airflow while a high velocity vehicle whizes by. And forget outdoors, the breeze would carry your image away, that's if you could even see it in the sunlight. Probably more useful in a haunted house ride...life-like ghosts, and cool the airflow and you also get the chill down the back of your neck too.

    2. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Biomechanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also you could scare folks in amusement park rides making them think they are about to crash into stuff.

      Yeah you could also put signs before the ride saying "this ride is safe using smokescreens", but during the ride they actually crash really really hard into stuff.

  7. Uuh-oh by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: The fog screen enables many novel applications indoors. Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls, or a walk-thru screen in world-class museums, corporate showrooms, trade fairs, theme parks, special events, spas, theatres, science centers, lobbies, etc. We can extend the technology to limited outdoor usage.

    Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Uuh-oh by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would it be disturbing that one of the most apparent uses for this technology is advertising ? Its not going to bring peace or solve world hunger. I'm sure the inventors will be looking to make a few dollars for their time and effort. The advertising industry will lap up, and pay top dollar for technology that allows them greater flexibility in advertising. Its probably the market the inventors have intended all along.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  8. Mimes are evil by hey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The video features a mime. No not a MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) but one of those guys with the white face paint. A very bad choice. If they don't want people to hate their product they sound use *anything* else.

  9. I say by Jage · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all just smoke and mirrors!

  10. This is going to confuse the crap out of Batman by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    How will he know when the Comissioner really calls him and its not just a couple of Finns messing about with their own batsign?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  11. The foggers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This isn't going to be used in business meetings, where projection screens are available anyway. I guess smoke-screens will be used as advertising space: One could use them much closer to or in the way of the customer flow at trade shows, without risking damage to equipment or consumer. For that purpose, a little image unstability may even prove useful as eye-catcher.

  12. Woo by rf0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now this is a cool and useful thing. It would be cool to have something like this in the home so I could use it as a monitor. If the main unit was hidden with a drop down keyboard. Well hidden PC :)

    Rus

  13. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I watched it, it's not worth downloading. It's just two geeks walking through a screen of fog. At one point one of them flaps his hands like he is a bird lol... maybe it is kind of funny.

    It's an interesting experiment anyways.

  14. Ars story by BigAl_nz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ars Technica story on the same thing.

    --
    --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
  15. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, using closed, proprietary, non-standards when there is no absolute need to do so is _very_ irritating.

    When creating video clips like this, what is so HARD about using an open, well established standard that everyone (including the few % not running M$ media player) can use?

    Btw, This is the first wmv I can't play at first attempt in mplayer under Linux. A file called 'wmv9dmod.dll' seems to be missing - can't find it on my Windows 98 installation either... :(

    To be at least a bit on topic, this technology seems awesome! I hope there will be an "affordable" consumer version ready.... Real Soon ... For my movie experiences in my living room!

  16. Re:porn? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, geeks can now have sex with fog! Getting to hologram sex, slowly but surely. :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. Cubed for Outdoor Concerts! by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Grab your favorite smelly hippie and head out to the old outdoor venue, forget about 90+ degree temps when you hop into the Fog Screen 3D!

    Based on the "mist tents" seen at Lollapalalaala(TM), you'll trip balls walking thru the 50 foot cube of cooling fog filled with visuals that _may_ have something to do with the music!

    Seriously, this is a great idea and I expect we'll see something based on this which gets the audience inside the thing at entertainment venues in the future. I also would like to say I'm glad to see it looking so good in the demo pics.

    Jonah Hex

  18. i saw it at siggraph last week by plagiarist · · Score: 5, Informative

    i saw it at siggraph last week in san diego. the wall of fog was not really very thick - though it did seem to be more transparent than and not as bright as it appears in the videos and stills on the site. it was still pretty cool and people seemed duly impressed, but i didn't think it was quite as convincing as a picture plane as it looks on the website.

    as for noise - i don't recall it being noisy... it may not have made any noise at all. then again, the siggraph emerging technologies space is pretty noisy itself, so it may have made some sound that i didn't notice.

    1. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I saw something similar at the city center at a city in China recently...they had water spigots that sprayed fine water vapor (droplets actually). A projector projected an image onto this vaporous area. Overall it was pretty impressive, the image was several stories high. You could only see the image from one side, I had to walk a ways to get to a good spot for viewing.

      Anyway, it was impressive until I saw what they were showing. All that achievement and technology, and they were showing a Doraemon anime. I think it was a pirate VCD because there were illegible subtitles on the bottom of the screen. The resolution was pretty low. It would have been much better off with a production specifically designed for the medium.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by spitzak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Saw this as Siggraph as well. It did attract a lot of interest. I walked through it, and most impressive is that you do not feel anything, the airflow is suprisingly low. The biggest problem I had is that the very bright light from the actual projector is visible, I see no way to avoid this and the image certainly looked better the more you are in line with the projector, but that light was blinding.

      Also at the same show and more interesting imho:

      The most important thing there was a High Dynamic Range display. They placed an LCD in front of a rear-projection display and the combined modulation results in a contrast range of 70000:1. This allows much more realistic images. The images I saw looked like a good slide projector, but could be better in a darker room. There was some registration problems, but they say they are working on using bright white LED's behind the LCD, resulting in a flat screen that is as sharp as an LCD. PS: they patented the idea, which for this I think is ok as long as they actually manufacture an open device, they were a little hesitant to say this, though the current driver is just a dual-headed graphics card and it seems hard to believe you could do much better than that.

      Also interesting was a rear-projection globe. It was maybe 6' in diameter and translucent white. This used a single rear projector in the base, reflected off a cone-shaped mirror inside at the top, to project on all sides. They had software showing images of the earth, other planets, continental plate drift. The brightness was suprisingly uniform and the fact that there was a black hole at the north pole was not a problem. A trackball let you spin the globe and the image moves very solidly, indicating the geometry is pretty accurate and they matched it with their image warping software (probably a hardware renderer using texture maps to distort the image correctly). Biggest problem is the room is going to have to be really dark for it to look good.

      There was also a demo of those "project on a flat surface" keyboards, and it really works. You can learn to type on it correctly in only a few minutes of practice. Biggest problem I see is that the alignment with the flat surface is critical, the phone manufacturers are going to have to come up with clever folding stands to stand the phone/pda at exactly the right angle. Also it seems obvious to me that the projected image could change, not just to different keyboards, but be used as a display. It requires distortion of the display much like that globe, but even a PDA could do that now.

  19. Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the fog somehow is shaped as an object we want to recreate, and projected against from all sides, would this make the object look like a 'real' hologram ('real', like from the movies!) ?

    I can already see a lot of applications for this. Bring out the mimejuice! And crack some ice!

    1. Re:Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well the fog now is shaped by air being blown down. You could in theory use finely controlled airflows to keep the fog in a certain shape. It would not be totally dissimmilar(?) to how a glass blower shapes glass. Of course glass is a lot more solid then fog :)

      For now probably only very simple shapes would be possible, like say a pyramid. Then again maybe with multiple projectors you can create the illusion of something being inside the fog?

      Then again you can bet your ass that the engineers at places like disney will be researching this very very thoroughly. So who knows.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  20. Great for firearms training by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This technology would be very useful for extremely realistic firearms training. Think FPS with real guns. The bullets would create holes in the fog screen which could be recognized by video sensors and this information could in turn be used as an input to the simulation.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    1. Re:Great for firearms training by psavo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This technology would be very useful for extremely realistic firearms training. Think FPS with real guns ...

      Sure! This vapor+projector equipment must be way-way cheaper than cardboard used today..

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:Great for firearms training by Johku · · Score: 2, Funny

      Realistic firearms training?

      "Oops! Sorry, I didn't know you were behind that screen."

    3. Re:Great for firearms training by ptbarnett · · Score: 3, Informative
      This vapor+projector equipment must be way-way cheaper than cardboard used today.

      There are systems in use today that are used to train police (and others) in live-fire simulations. A string of photoelectric sensors line the top/bottom and sides of the screen, allowing the system to identify the impact point.

      However, the system typically uses a thin plastic screen for projection of the video image, which deteriorates after use. This system would be a good replacement for it, although I don't know how long it would take to break-even on the costs.

      In Dallas, you can see and use one:

      http://www.dfwgun.com/InteractiveSystem.htm

      and you can find more info about the system at:

      http://www.ais-sim.com/PRISim/overview.html

  21. It needs work, IMHO. by Hwatzu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be honest, it needs work; the top of the screen looks fine, but turbulence causes the bottom of the screen to ruffle about like a flag in wind. Watch the movies provided; the bottom half of the images are all but lost to distortion.

  22. Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative
    When creating video clips like this, what is so HARD about using an open, well established standard that everyone (including the few % not running M$ media player) can use?

    Quite a lot, as it happens. The main hassle being that there aren't any well established open standards that provide decent compression rates. At least, if there are then I'd be grateful for people enlightening me

    I had to put video up on my site - I chose MPEG 1 at first because everyone could view it, but eventually the file sizes started getting huge and I had to switch to something else. ISO MP4 can't be played by MS WMP, Divx and what have you can't be played without installing additional software on client machines...what to pick?

    In the end, I chose .wmv for a while. Seemed to give the best picture quality/file size trade-off. However, since then I've bought myself a Powerbook so all future things will be Quicktime.

    Honestly - if anyone knows a format that can be played on out-of-the-box Windows, OS X and common Linux distros without the installation of any extra software, I'd love to hear about it.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Open-standards video by anno1a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't really make any sense... You didn't choose divx because it required additional software, so you chose wmv? Wmv can ONLY be played in windows, and I think it requires a fairly new version at that. And now you're switching to Quicktime?? WMP can't play quicktime, everyone hates the quicktime player, and it's hardly supported anywhere! Now you've gone from a more or less open standard, to a rather closed standard which requires a special player. What was wrong with divx again? Or the open XviD for that matter...

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    2. Re:Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...You didn't choose divx because it required additional software...Wmv can ONLY be played in windows,...WMP can't play quicktime

      That was my point - none of the choices available fit the bill. Original poster asked what was hard about putting up standards-compliant video, and my answer is that there's no one file format that plays on all clients and still produces a decent file size/performance trade-off. I've just picked the easiest one for me to work with and stuck with that.

      What was wrong with divx again? Or the open XviD for that matter...

      Extra client software required. The aim is to get a file that plays on the three major OSes in their out-of-the-box configurations. So far, I've not found any format that fits the bill other than MPEG 1, and the file sizes that produces are unacceptably large.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Open-standards video by Sherloqq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly - if anyone knows a format that can be played on out-of-the-box Windows, OS X and common Linux distros without the installation of any extra software, I'd love to hear about it.

      While I don't have an answer to that, I know of an answer that requires a similar amount of work for all those platforms: RealPlayer. Yes, it can be annoying. But it works. I happily use RP on windows and linux, and I'm pretty sure even my old PowerBook 5300 could handle it (just to prove it to myself I'll try it tonight).

      No, I don't work for Real. Yes, I work with Real products. Yes, I like 'em. Yes, I'm a geek. And yes, I have a life.

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    4. Re:Open-standards video by James+Lanfear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Wmv can ONLY be played in windows"

      $ mplayer -vc help | grep wmv
      ffwmv1 ffmpeg working FFmpeg M$ WMV1/WMV7 [wmv1]
      ffwmv2 ffmpeg problems FFmpeg M$ WMV2/WMV8 [wmv2]
      wmv8 dshow working Windows Media Video 8 [wmv8ds32.ax]
      wmv7 dshow working Windows Media Video 7 [wmvds32.ax]
      wmv9dmo dmo working Windows Media Video 9 DMO [wmv9dmod.dll]
      wmvdmo dmo working Windows Media Video DMO [wmvdmod.dll]

      "WMP can't play quicktime, everyone hates the quicktime player, and it's hardly supported anywhere!"

      $ mplayer -vc help | grep qt
      qtrle qtrle working Quicktime Animation (RLE)
      qtrpza qtrpza working Quicktime Apple Video
      qtsmc qtsmc working Apple Graphics (SMC) codec
      qt3ivx qtvideo working win32/quicktime 3IV1 (3ivx) decoder [3ivx Delta 3.5.qtx]
      qth263 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime H.263 decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtrlerpza qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime RLE/RPZA decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtvp3 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime VP3 decoder [On2_VP3.qtx]
      qtzygo qtvideo problems win32/quicktime ZyGo decoder [ZyGoVideo.qtx]
      qtbhiv qtvideo untested win32/quicktime BeHereiVideo decoder [BeHereiVideo.qtx]
      qtcvid qtvideo working win32/quicktime Cinepak decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtindeo qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime Indeo decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtmjpeg qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime MJPEG decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtmpeg4 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime MPEG-4 decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtsvq3 qtvideo working win32/quicktime SVQ3 decoder [QuickTimeEssentials.qtx]
      qtsvq1 qtvideo problems win32/quicktime SVQ1 decoder [QuickTime.qts]

  23. No holographs for you by SoVi3t · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't care how much you whine and cry, this won't be making any Star Wars style holographs. You could project a 2D image onto it, but a full 3D image (viewable from all angles), would likely be impossible. How would you manage to project images into all the crevices and such, and also how would you hold the fog in a specific shape?

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    1. Re:No holographs for you by sonicattack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought about making 'real' holograms using this technology. It just _might_ be possible. I think that given enough motivation, and the right people working on this, there can be progress made in the right direction. Why am I hopeful? Well, your mentioning it being impossible motivated me a bit.. :)

      Now, I will let my imagination run wild and try to address the problems you mentioned. Even though I am no engineer, perhaps something resembling my ideas might be possible. First, holding the fog in its 'proper shape'. How about a system manipulating the airflow around the hologram? Heavy focused airflow. Or how about a magnetically charged fog, the outline of which easily modelled by means of surrounding electromagnetic fields? Crazy? I don't know. Television would have sounded like a pretty crazy idea too some hundred years ago. (...Doesn't prove I'm right, I know...)

      Secondly, creating the image? A system of lasers and mirrors (or something able to _quickly_ change the direction of the lightbeams) surrounding the projection?

      Now tell me I'm crazy!

    2. Re:No holographs for you by danila · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, on average there are less than two eyes in a human. So you don't necessarily need the "hologram" do look correctly from all points of view, just from two. Second, the eyes are so close that sometimes you don't even need the stereo, the flat object can look 3D enough if you successfully use other cues (like place this "hologram" behind some objects and in front of others). Add to that eye tracking for the observer and you can dinamically adjust the picture for the the observer's position. If you can walk around the object, it would look sufficiently 3D.

      Of course, this will not allow the creation of a completely realistic illusion of a real 3D object, but it would still look cool.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  24. Ugh. by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls

    Great, just what the human race needs. Another way to display advertisements. I do my best to ignore them, but if I have to walk through an ad, it's going to be hard not to see it.

  25. Done by peterpi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What, like what these guys have been doing for years?

  26. Possible Use for it! by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about using a giant outdoor mist-screen to show flickery 8mm. movies of ghosts &c. from a concealed projector, in order to scare away the residents from an old village where you have been secretly conducting a highly lucrative but probably illegal operation, so they won't nick your money / grass you up?

    Oh, wait, I think this might have been done before .....

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  27. Re:Seen it before by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wasn't this the type of TV set they had in Seaquest DSV for the AI computer?

    Yes it was. It's simply someone that yet again took an idea from Science Fiction and made it reality.

    Kinda like thise silly Sattelites, lasers and rockets to the moon :-)

    It's just that it seems that science is catching up to Science Fiction alot faster these days.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. No Fog by GregoryD · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't want a screen. I want images implanted into my brain before my lifetime is over. I want the screen to be my vision, an interactive custom 3D reality.

    Then I can realize my dream, Brittney Spears backup dancer. And after the show... she leads me by the hand to her dressing room... errrrm

    I mean to play Quake 10, yeah, thats it. Quake.

    1. Re:No Fog by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want images implanted into my brain before my lifetime is over.

      That's easily solved: www.goatse.cx

      Watch that picture for a few hours straight, and I'm sure that image will be implanted into your brain until your lifetime is over.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  29. Ah, I've got it! by clambake · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, combine this with adaptive camouflage and you've got yourself an invisible secret lair from which to lauch evil plans. Super villiany is finally feasible, and just in time for Arnold to win the Governorship to do battle with, sweet!

  30. leafblowers by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you could make a pretty decent mockery of any billboard using this with a leafblower...or an industrial vacuum: "hey, mcdonalds! you *suck*"

  31. RTFA by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a new prototype, unveiled in July 2003. A revisit instead of a new post.

    Now go flame the guys posting dupes of a new Mozilla release.

    --
    Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
  32. Ya know, I think.... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wile E. Coyote could have actually caught the Road Runner with one of these things.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  33. Inspired by Last Starfighter? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

    In The Last Starfighter , Alex Rogan's mentor "Grig" described the technology used for displaying their heads up display.

    Basically he said it was produced by projecting images onto a field of xeon gas. (Or something along those lines. Anyone care to refresh my memory?)

    Seems to me like these guys got their inspiration from the movies. :)

  34. Re:OMG by jmccay · · Score: 3, Funny

    This actually reminds me more of the Membari 360 degree display of battles, and the display screens on the Whitestar fleet. They both came down from the ceiling.
    This is cool technology! Although, I'd think you'd want to keep it away from wall and wooden areas to prevent the growth of mold and mildew.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  35. My newest peripheral: by roelbj · · Score: 5, Funny

    My vacuum cleaner is now a screen capture utility! Can I get a Hoover with USB?

  36. Two sided display? by PSaltyDS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how well a laminar flow smoke curtain would do with images projected on BOTH sides? The cool effect I imagine is walking down a corridor with several of these screens crossing it. As you walk through the image of a wall with a door in it, you turn around and see the image of the other side of the "wall". Look forward again and you see the next "wall", which you can also walk through to see what's on the other side. The series of images could give a tourist a walk right through a virtual pryramid, or some other interesting tour, like the entrance hall in the opening sequence of 'Get Smart' or MST3K.

    ...think of a sig, quick! Oh no! Too late... arrrrrgh!!!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  37. Hope They Are Looking for Outdoor Markets by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because the load on the air conditioning for removing all of that humidity from an indoor setup will be huge.

  38. Re:DivX is the only acceptable format by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BLECH, I have yet to see a decent DivX player that doenst crash half the time MPG4 thankyou.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  39. Re:OMG by PSaltyDS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No mold or mildew involved because there doesn't have to be water vapor involved. The mist does not get things wet, according to the article. That means it is not water. More like the fake smoke used for special effects, probably.

    Two posts in one article and I already used my sig, now what...?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  40. Not Smoke, Fog... by virg_mattes · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Wonder if you're able to breath in the room when this smoke is there for a couple of hours.

    It's not smoke, it's fog. The difference is that it's not going to hang around after it leaves the laminar airflow, because it's opaque vaporized stuff (fog), not particles suspended in air (smoke). There are lots of materials that one can use to create non-persistent fog that isn't water vapor, much like the fog used in nightclubs. It'll just dissipate when it gets out of the laminar airflow.

    Virg

    1. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by neoform · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heh, the fog in nightclubs lingers for at least 10 minutes after released, then afterwards (if used enought) the whole place smells like fog juice.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by NichG · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference between fog and water vapor is that in fog, the water has formed small droplets of fluid which are suspended in the air, as opposed to a uniform mixture of water and air (or pure water vapor in extreme cases). Those droplets scatter light, and you get an opaque screen. However, those droplets convert to water vapor as long as the humidity isn't near saturation for that temperature, and the fog dissipates. Water vapor does not have to be at 100C (or even 100F) ; 100C is the point at which the vapor state dominates, but you get a fraction of vapor supported at lower temperatures (the vapor pressure of a substance).

      If you used water in the machine, the simple solution would be to keep the room's humidity low, so that the fog dissipates more quickly. Either way, damage to the people in the room would be no worse than breathing the air on a foggy day.

      NichG

  41. Major old technology by rjw57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you cast your mind back to the 'hologram' in the Captains cabin in the original Seaquest DSV, that used /exactly/ this technology.

    --
    Rich
  42. Disenyland already has this by ShawnDoc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hate to brake it to these geeks, but they've obviously never been to Disneyland. The Indiana Jones ride has had this technology for years. A fog screen is created and then it has projected on it the moving image of rats running along a log and dropping off. Your jeep then drives through the screen, scaring women who are afraid of rats.

    (Some days it works really well, some days it doesn't.)

  43. Not really new by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... this is not really a new idea or application. In one of the expo's the pepsi (I think it was pepsi) pavillion was a geodesic dome. They lined the entire dome with stainless steel tubes with very small holes drilled in it (it took them quite awhile to determine he exact size). The idea being that forcing very clean water through the tubes and very small holes would produce fog.

    The entire structure, thus, was totally covered in fog - and they used both lasers and video projectors to color and animate the surface.

    And anyway... what, nobody ever thought of shineing a video or slide projector (or laser) at fog before. Geezesus.

  44. Done in Vegas 7 years ago too... by statusbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It has also been done in Vegas 8 years ago at the MGM Grand Hotel's EFX show (now defunct):

    I was one of the designers of a MIDI Show Control-to-Allen-Bradley PLC controller specifically designed for this show. The EFX show used dozens of them. These boxes in turn were controlled by Amigas! by Richmod Sound Design's software.

    The fog wall in the show was huge, and they would project a scene onto the fog while the actors and props would be moved into place. Then the fog would dissipate and the projected 'scene' would come to life.

    --jeffy++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  45. Wile E. Coyote uses by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Funny
    The fog screen enables many novel applications indoors. Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls, or a walk-thru screen in world-class museums, corporate showrooms, trade fairs, theme parks, special events, spas, theatres, science centers, lobbies, etc.... We will also present some intriguing new concepts later.

    One of our favorite uses: an image that people can walk through which looks just like a solid brick wall... exactly six inches in front of a real brick wall. Get your webcams ready.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  46. Re:CCOOOOOOLL!!! by LudditeMind · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or even better a fluid mechanics plugin for winamp! You could display fog on the fog!

  47. First-hand experiences by E_elven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is actually a repost from a few months back. I first saw it when they demoed it at an IT convention in Helsinki -the pictures don't quite tell the truth about the quality of the image, it's in fact a lot more stable and crisp than it might seem -and sticking your hand was neat, too, although it got me into trouble actually punching one of those ancient solid-monitors we still have at the office :) Anyway, from what I've heard (haven't been around there for a while), the quality has gotten even better nowadays. I wouldn't really start speculating about holographic displays yet. It's just 'cool.'

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!