Slashdot Mirror


TAM 5 Has landed

bzant writes "TAM 5 The model airplane, (see our previous story), has successfully landed in Ireland. This was the second plane they launched. Other than some slow speeds and a concern over a lean fuel mixture the flight seemed to go as planned."

45 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Help us out a little by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Alluding to the fact that there was a previous article isn't enough. The TAM5 link is a map and a bunch of coordinates - what is all of this? The "previous story" linked too turns around and links to yet two previous stories.

    At least give your audience a brief two sentence re-cap, state the goal of the endeavor, and give a reason why we should click the link (it's commonly refferred to as a "blurb" in journalism). Slashdot is now popular (and commercial) enough to have editors that can at least follow the basics of journalism. You are making OSDN look bad. Step up and be big boys, for Christ's sake.

    1. Re:Help us out a little by grug0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, wait for all the extra info in the dupes.

    2. Re:Help us out a little by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Informative

      The project is basically a model airplane that crossed the Atlantic on its own using GPS for navigation.

      --
      Martin
    3. Re:Help us out a little by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or you could stop giving slashdot users a bad name and just click on the "Info" link on the site. It provides links to a couple of sites detailing the project. Here's one.

      Additionally, becoming a slashdot subscriber doesn't entitle you to better journalism, just less ads and a few other features. The editors aren't journalists. If you spent your money thinking they were, then I have a nice Nigerian man that you may need your help. :)

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  2. Congratulations! by martingunnarsson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really a cool project, and while it might seem like a geeky hobby thing, I think it's much more important than that. I think we'll se R/C helicopters that move around on their own used for surveillance and as a support for police and firefighters pretty soon. I mean, these things already exist. The flight over the ocean shows that they can handle long distance flights as well, at lest in 50% of the cases :-)

    --
    Martin
    1. Re:Congratulations! by tramm · · Score: 3, Informative
      martingunnarsson wrote:
      This is really a cool project, and while it might seem like a geeky hobby thing, I think it's much more important than that. I think we'll se R/C helicopters that move around on their own [...]
      Like autopilot.sourceforge.net? It is a Free Software autopilot for RC helicopters that has successfully flown for several km and been adapted to numerous different helicopter models. Rotomotion, LLC builds a commercial UAV based on the software and also sells kits for more technically inclined users of the software.
      The flight over the ocean shows that they can handle long distance flights as well, at lest in 50% of the cases :-)
      Although TAM5 was a fixed wing, not a rotorcraft, and the success rate was more like 20% (1 out of 5)...
      --
      -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
  3. Amazing by arvindn · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://tam.plannet21.com/FAQs.htm#leader

    Who is the leader of this project?

    Maynard Hill is an American, born in Pennsylvania in 1926. He has been an avid modeler all his life. He has contributed technical advances through his 23 world records. He has contributed as President of the AMA and delegate to international model airplane meetings. Maynard has designed and contructed all the models for this project in spite of the fact that he is legally blind and nearly deaf. Apart from the goal of setting a new record for straight line distance, one of Maynard's objectives is to demonstrate that people with handicaps can overcome them.

    1. Re:Amazing by ebacon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good work on his part then. Too bad he can't see any of his acheivements though.

      Not necessarily so. Maynard Hill is legally blind, which may simply mean he can't see well enough to drive. It certainly doesn't mean he can't see at all.

    2. Re:Amazing by _Upsilon_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I live in Newfoundland, and was actually there at some of the launches (including the one that made it) and have talked to Mr. Hill.

      He gave an interview to a local newspaper here last summer, and part of it was about his handicaps. It mentioned that in order for him to glue the planes together, he had to put some bright red dye in the glue so that he could see it.

      Glad to see that they made it this time.

    3. Re:Amazing by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but can he play pinball?

  4. Good Job. by ianjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is nice to see that they finally made it.

    Now, can they make it all the way around?

    1. Re:Good Job. by KoshClassic · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Agreed - the team that just accomplished this did so while trying to adhere to the size and weight limits for a particular class of aircraft as defined by one of the international aviation federations. One of the limits is that the plane could weigh no more than 11 lbs.

      I know that the plane that just made the Atlantic crossing carried 1 gallon of fuel - not sure of the exact weight of a gallon of this fuel, but I imagine that the extra fuel required for a full circumnavigation would pretty much necessitate that the weight exceeded 11 lbs given today's technology. To circumnavigate the globe with an 11 lbs. plane pretty much at this point I think would be an excercise in aerodynamic and propulsion efficiency, or maybe even lightweight materials engineering, not in the technology of autonomous flight and navigation.

      On the other hand - if they could adhere to the weight limits by doing autonomous mid-air refuelings, I'd be VERY impressed.

      If you want to ignore weight limits, then you get into things like Global Hawk, which successfully flew across the Pacific on its own two years ago. Since Voyager proved that its possible to carry enough fuel to make the trip, it would just be a matter of combining the technologies.

      --
      Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  5. Nooooooo! by grug0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the leprechauns can escape to other countries!

  6. great for drug/weapon smuggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    now we know how to get 1-2kilos of cocaine or some of those lovely anthrax/botulism spores from USA to Ireland, iam sure the IRA will be most pleased at the developments there now
    we have a nice non-radar detectable transporation method thats cheap and capable, nothing like a practical application of long distance remote controlled (cheap) devices for terrorists

  7. Re:Wow by DataCannibal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nope, the next step is to kidnap the baby of the guy who flew the thing. Using a remote control getaway car, of course

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  8. Just the beginning by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is great news, but like all pioneering events, it's just the beginning of a brave new future. Someday, regularly scheduled model airplane flights over the Atlantic, as well as to other destinations, will be a commonplace occurance. In the future, everyone will have unmaned aerial vehicle service available right in their backyards. Soon, inexpensive GPS programmable reusable UAV's with automatic colision avoidance will be available to anyone for less than the price of an automobile at stores everywhere.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  9. Re:Wow by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's a LOT harder than you'd think. Even over interplanetary distances there is a lag between transmission and reception that can be potentially catastrophic - radio waves can only travel at c, so as the distance to your radio controlled toy increases you get corresponding increases in the time taken to get a signal to or from it. In the case of the moon, you have:

    Distance between the moon and earth(d): 384,500 km
    Speed of light(c): 299,792,458 m/s
    d / c = 1.283 seconds

    So you end up sending a signal and a second later your rocket/whatever responds. Obviously not a situation in which tight maneuvering is possible.

    The problem is even worse to other planets - delays to Mars run into several minutes. To do anything complicated things send out there have to be as autonomous as possible with any control from Earth being little more than "go here", "do this", "go there" and letting the machine work out how to do it.

  10. Cool by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be pretty cool to have your pizza delivered by a GPS guided helicopter droid, yes. I bet they would fly like how pizza boys drive though, which would be bad for telephone poles, birds, tall houses, etc.

  11. Re:In related news by rde · · Score: 2, Funny

    after landing, the plane went out with its mates, got royally pissed, and managed an altercation with the local constabulary.

    Yet another slur on we humble Irish. At least, that's the way I'm going to take it. I'll just point out two things...
    a) s/royally/republicanically
    b) s/constabulary/gardai.

    Typical bloody yank. Not only assumes that Irish stereotypes are correct, but confuses us with the Brits at the same time.

  12. Fantastic by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After several thousand years of persistent research and development, we have finally upstaged the carrier pigeon. Too bad that, in the meantime, radio was developed.

    Seriously though, it's a great accomplishment. Sure, the military or decent-sized corporation could and have done this without breaking a sweat. Yet the general public has an important role here: pushing technology further ahead. It isn't futile to do things the leaders have already done, because it forces them to keep innovating that much more. Inspiration for all the hobbyists out there!

    --
    ...
  13. Re:Second Plane, Let's see TAM 5 what about 1-4 by WHExeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, if you nose around a little the site details the fate of all four previous attempts. In text it says that 1 and 2 were quickly lost due to mechanical problems or miscalculations. For 3 and 4 it actually shows on a map how far they had progressed before last contact. A different shot of the same map shows TAM 5 reaching its destination. All in all, a very cool project -- a substantial goal accomplished through ingenuity and persistence. Thanks /. for tipping us to the TAM project.

  14. When does the invasion begin? by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that Ireland is clearly within range to launch an UAV attack on the US, we can expect the invasion to happen shortly.

  15. R/C Vehicles by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I saw this nifty R/C blimp at a tradeshow once. It was about 3 feet long. It could be moved in all three axis, and was perfectly content hovering as well. It broadcasted an image from an underbelly camera to a standard TV channel.

    It was rather neat watching the blimp flying around the auditorium and spying on things from the air.

    Ever since I saw the thing, I've been wanting to build one.

    1. Re:R/C Vehicles by martingunnarsson · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with blimps is that they are very wind sensitive. If you want to use one outdoors it should be really calm, or you can end up chasing your blimp all over town. Indoors however, they are really cool. If you have a somewhat small blimp or a big room.

      --
      Martin
    2. Re:R/C Vehicles by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are ways to overcome this problem. Between using an aerodynamic shape for the gasbag and larger fans, a miniblimp is quite capable of outdoor operation.

      The one that I really like is the internal-rotor helicopter-style design. I actually helped someone test some ideas for one of these. We took a plastic toy propeller (from those pull-string toys), and attached it to a Dremel rotary tool. Fire the thing up to 15,000 RPM, and it rapidly lifted the tool, which was being held down by the AC cord.

      If we had used a cordless version, it probably would have been capable of independant flight.

      The real problem came from the fact that these little flimsy plastic rotors aren't meant for any more than, say, 1000RPM. After 20 or 30 seconds of flight, it promptly exploded.

  16. Somehow by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    I cant see it surviving the return trip carrying loads of duty free Guiness

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Somehow by samhalliday · · Score: 2, Funny

      its spelt "guinness": and how many times do we have to tell you bloody foreigners... IT DOESNT TRAVEL!!! ;-)

  17. Hell of an achievement. by dr.Flake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reading some of the commentairies I get the fealing not everybody graps the full level of the achievements made here.

    Imagine having to make / design one of these suckers yourself!

    what do you need:

    Plane (duh)
    Controls: GPS, computer, satelite link!, electric controls + receiver, battery etc
    fuel!!!: lots of it. its only like 3000 miles or so. (40 hours of flying)

    now fit it within these specs to be able to call it a "model airplane":
    max 5 kg
    max size 2x2 meter
    max engine cap. 0.6c
    (there are several more limitations)

    Hope every one graps the achievement here.

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    1. Re:Hell of an achievement. by zelbinion · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mod the parent up. This is an amazing accomplishment.

      As a R/C modeler myself, the specs of this plane are basically what I learned to fly on. Think: standard trainer with an O.S. 61 engine. This sort of plane can typically fly about 20 minutes on a tank of gas, and never more than about 800 feet in altitude, and never more than about a mile and half away. Things you have to worry about are:

      1. Running out of gas.
      2. Having the temperature conditions change the performance of the engine, causing it to stall. (It is not uncommon to tweak the fuel mixture on a model airplane on nearly every flight through an afternoon of flying.)
      3. Such a small plane is susceptible to fairly small gusts of wind that can make if fly off-course, flip it upside down, etc. Anything more than about 15mph wind, and most model airplanes get tricky to fly. Especially if it is gusty (i.e. not a constant wind speed/direction)
      4. Battery life - standard R/C batteries will last for about 2-4 hours max.
      5. There is no way to restart the motor if it quits
      6. Things can (and often do) come apart in flight. These things are made of balsa wood and heat-shrink coating. I've had planes explode in flight, wings come off, tails come off, etc.

      Now, take a model airplane that is only about 5 feet long and with a wing span of 6 feet, and operates as described above, and modify it so that it can:

      1. Fly continuously for 40 hours.
      2. Fly through day and night in a variety of temperature and moisture conditions and not have the engine quit, or have to adjust the fuel mixture (since you can't do that in flight on the TAM models)
      3. Navigate 1900 miles by itself, negotiating mid-Atlantic weather, variable wind speed, variable wind direction, variable air density, temperature, etc, with NO help from a pilot.
      4. Somehow provide power for all of the electronics for 40 hours
      5. Somehow fit 5.5 pounds of fuel, plus standard R/C radio, plus a home-grown GPS auto-navigation system, plus an alternator for the electrical equipment, plus two telemetry data systems, plus the computer to run it all into a plane that only weighs 11 pounds (think: two bag of groceries) and not weaken the structure so much that the whole mess DOESN'T fly apart on you.

      Now do that while legally blind and def.

      All I can say is: Wow.
      (okay, I had a whole bunch of four-letter words to say, but they aren't appropriate in this situation...)

  18. Re:so where are the details? by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 2, Funny

    > yet all it can say on the site is 'the plane has landed' wheres all the info?

    Yeah, they've been wasting their time on the technology and engineering rather than a REALLY COOL website.

    Anyway, I'm sure someone reading this forum can donate them a Casio wrist watch running Apache that they can insert right into the plane for live updates.

  19. Landing most impressive by mnmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe the landing part was the most impressive of feats whether it was automated by GPS or some smart sensors on the plane and runway brought it down smoothly. I'd like to know more on that.

    The second most impressive part is maintaining a constant flight. The general altitude direction are set by a GPS sensor but constantly monitoring the devices, compensating for the temperature and winds, and sending the data back through satellite would be pretty complex. I'd like to know more about the on-board computers and the satellite uplink (and how much that cost).

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Landing most impressive by General_Corto · · Score: 4, Informative
      According to a National Geographic article from last year's attempts, the landing is handled by a local pilot:

      Pilot Paul Howey and others will be in Ireland waiting for the plane to appear on the horizon. They will head out to the bog and, if the plane comes in, take over manual control and land it.

      That seems a lot easier than trying to have the plane land itself, or landing it remotely (and by remotely I mean from the wrong side of the Atlantic).
  20. national security? by samhalliday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    hmm, whats to stop anyone making one of these things and kitting it out with an explosive or biological warhead? can radars pick these things out as being targets without seagulls etc. raising false alarms?

    1. Re:national security? by quantaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hmm, whats to stop anyone making one of these things and kitting it out with an explosive or biological warhead? can radars pick these things out as being targets without seagulls etc. raising false alarms?

      What's to stop anyone from making weapons out of half a dozen other simple things, the fact is it doesn't take more then about a minute to think of a ton of ways to do some serious damage if you really wanted too. In the end trying to specifically thwart each possible type of attack is bound to fail, the only real solution is to try and take away peoples motives for attacking you otherwise you're just waiting for something to happen.

      That being said this admittadly does have potential to do more damage then many other alternatives if for no other reason then it allows for a more easily anonymous and somewhat large scale attack then a lot of other things I can think of at the moment.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  21. Only way to stop drug smuggling by panurge · · Score: 3, Funny
    Satellite guided self navigating smart missiles equipped to detect those sneaky little model aircraft and zap them right out of the sky...but wait, the armaments industry will need to get involved:

    Model aircraft engine $50
    As above to JAN spec with testing $15000

    Model aircraft fuselage $50
    As above, built by Lockheed, say $25000

    Home made navigation system $1000
    As above, built by Martin Marietta... oh, just make the whole thing a round $100000.

    Yes, folks, the threat from model aircraft carrying drugs could kickstart the entire US tech economy, just like Star Wars was going to in the 80s.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  22. How about something marine? by cvk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This was a great project. I know we've all had daydreams of building autonomous flying machines, and I wonder how many of us have also daydreamed of a small autonomous submersible? I think that a tiny submarine would be just as exciting to see cross the Atlantic although a bit slower.

    The primary benefit of a vehicle that uses the water as its transport mechanism is that it can't crash! It could stay a few dozen meters below the surface for optimum travel speed and emerge from the water at intervals to update its position by GPS and wire that and other data such as temperature, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, and the like back to the crew on land.

    Once nice side effect of traveling in such a dense medium is that a great deal of instrumentation weight would be okay since it's easy to make things float in water. The same cannot be said of the air! That means it might be possible to use a device like a gyroscope to keep track of heading while under the surface. Try loading something like that onto an RC airplane and you'll need some big wings.

    1. Re:How about something marine? by dr.Flake · · Score: 2, Informative

      Already is.

      I'm sorry that i can';t find the link (how dare you state something without a link) but some people have already made something like that. It's even niftier than you imagine now.

      They build a submersible that uses the flow of water as it sinks to propel itself. The difference in water temperature is then used to generate energy. At the bottom, the proces is reversed, again gaining momentum and energy as it raises!

      At the surface it then sends out the research data aquired sofar, and sinks again. Till the end of days.

      cool he?

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    2. Re:How about something marine? by rotorhead · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about the underwater glider: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/CuttingEdge /cuttingedge021011.html

    3. Re:How about something marine? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder how many of us have also daydreamed of a small autonomous submersible?

      Well, there's me, though I was only interested in submersion as a means of riding out nasty storms. Technically, it's almost trivial since, as you note, making something that floats isn't very difficult and you don't have the size and power constraints that you would in an airplane. The one thing I haven't figured out is how to send back large quantities of data -- like a jpeg every few minutes -- without getting into expensive stuff like satellite phones. Get around that problem, and you could mount a digital camera with a 180 fish-eye lens vertically, and use a script with panotools to create a navigable hemispherical panorama back at the base. How cool would that be?

      Now, what I'd really like to do is build an autonomous zeppelin that stays aloft on solar power and replenishes its hydrogen supply by electrolyzing captured moisture, but that would be mind-bogglingly expensive...

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  23. CORRECTION by jsimon12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This would be the fifth plane they have launched, read the website:

    #1. Crashed due to a steering servo issue
    #2. Fuel system problem
    #3. Bad weather
    #4. LOST

  24. Re:Second Plane, Let's see TAM 5 what about 1-4 by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 2, Funny

    Listen, lad, I built this plane up from nothing. All I had when I started was swamp ... other kings said I was daft to build a plane on a swamp, but I built it all the same ... just to show 'em. It crashed. So I built a another one ... that crashed into the swamp. I built another one ... That fell over and THEN crashed .... So I built another ... and that made it across the Atlantic. ...

    It's a slow day at work...

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  25. Re:Wow by paradesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the anime movie, Hoshe no Koe (sp?) aka Voice of a Distant Star deals with this. Two friends are separated over a growing distance as they attempt to keep their relationship going. its quite touching. The time it takes their text messages to reach eachother grows longer and longer. definately worth watching.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  26. Suspicious by essreenim · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm from Ireland and I mapped the precise gps coordinates to a map which seems to suggest the model plane actually didn't quite reach dry land at time of post. Maybe it has now but latitude 53 degrees, 27.67; and longitude 10 degrees, 4.20 is in the Atlantic ocean just a mile or so off the coast og county Galway - so close you could see the emerald hills (if it's not too misty)

  27. Legally Blind by morven2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    in most areas means significant, UNCORRECTIBLE vision problems that are severe enough to be somewhat disabling.

    If someone who is 'legally blind' is driving, then one of two things is the case. Either he's not truly deserving of the status, OR he shouldn't be on the road. Probably the latter. Someone who's 'legally blind' should not be able to pass the vision exam to drive, even with corrective lenses, but unfortunately cheating the vision exam in most US states at least is quite easy -- one can just memorise the chart, since the same one is always in use.

    Someone who's legally blind may be able to read, but they will not be able to read the normal type size in a newspaper or book without a strong magnifying glass.

  28. Re:Filthy Critic Dead? by Chundra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah it's true. I saw it happen. The Harelip got angry at him for puking on her back after drinking too many Coors at happy hour. She chased him out of the Arvada Tavern with a pool cue. He hopped on his banana-seat bike and took off like a bat out of hell. I don't know if he shit himself or if he was just plastered (maybe both), but he definitely was swerving around a lot. Some blonde yuppie girl in a Ford Expedition (undoubtedly on her cell phone) broadsided him. He died instantly.