Slashdot Mirror


Rio Announces Networked Ogg Vorbis Player

Alexander writes "Rio has announced several players, among them the Karma 20GB Ogg Vorbis music player, which also sports Ethernet as the preferred connection method. Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptance?" There's more information on the new Rio line-up via an article at The Register.

81 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. 40GB, too! by Arthaed · · Score: 5, Informative

    And don't forget that according to this link, there is also going to be a 40GB for around $499!

    --
    Unique signatures are rare.
    1. Re:40GB, too! by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just this weekend I just purchased a Panasonic (SL-SX420) portable CD player that happens to read MP3 CDs too. It was $39.99 at BestBuy. I was shopping around for a portable MP3 player but couldn't see spending $200 on a 20GB Nomad or even more for an iPod.

      For those of you more unfortunate poor people (like myself), perhaps this player would better suit your needs.

  2. Give to xiph if you use these. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cynics are numerous and void of ideas. Ignore them. I hope Rio is giving to Xiph for using Ogg (I hear Xiph takes contracts to develop for a particular hardware), but anyone getting one of these should be donating. If Rio says they are giving a portion of the proceeds to Xiph, I'd be even more likely to buy from them.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      anyone getting one of these should be donating.
      I can hear those "Flamebait" mods being cocked already, but ... in a word ... why?

      If Xiph wants to make money off Ogg, they should sell it. If I want to donate money, I'll donate it to cancer research or something.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      why?
      Theoretically: because you care about the outcome and can make a difference. Because giving to Xiph is a way to make the world become more like what you want it to be.
      If I want to donate money, I'll donate it to cancer research or something.
      Hey, fine, whatever is most important to you, back it.

      In my case, I care more about Xiph than cancer research. The reaper must come for us all, and I don't think I'll escape him in the end. But I think I do see a way for programmers and users to avoid ever having to debase themselves by grovelling at MPEG's (or Microsoft's, or Apple/Sorenson's) feet, begging permission to do something with their own computers.

      Another thing about cancer research, is that I wouldn't have the slightest clue how my money would be used, or whether or not it would really make a difference. OTOH, Xiph is pretty open about its needs, and it's satisfying to realize that I can give them a few percent of their budget. If there were 20 or 30 of us, we could keep Monty employed full time. And the one thing everyone should have noticed by now is that Monty delivers. This isn't some kind of speculative gamble. Vorbis is here now, and it works, and it rocks. And it's going to get even better, and get supported by more and more devices, because people who care about it are going to make it happen.

      Compare that to what you get out of cancer research.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  3. Rio Car by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The software that runs on the thing is based on the software used in the Empeg linux player.. the Karma runs linux, and has a usb2 hub, not a client.. lots of hack potential.

    1. Re:Rio Car by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Unlike some previous Empeg/Rio products, the Karma does not run Linux. It runs Ecos, the popular open-source embedded OS. The firmware isn't designed to be modified like the Rio Central or car-player was.

      (It always used to gall me slightly that the Rio Central and car-player were described as "hackable", with the implication that people customising them were outwitting us in some way, whereas in fact we put a good deal of effort into making them geek-customisable...)

      Peter

    2. Re:Rio Car by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Funny

      geek-customisable

      -This should be a marketing buzzword in a few years.

      However, you will only see it used to cover up a bug:

      Engineer: I still can't get the user interface to work right.
      Marketing person: That's OK, we'll just say it's geek-customisable, for the advanced user.

  4. Finally by ttyp0 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is exactly what I've been waiting for. There are lots of great MP3 players out there, but most depend on USB. I want something that I can use with my stereo system, and running a 30 ft CAT5 is much easier than 30ft of USB cable. Now only if it were 802.11. I think this device will definately have me looking at Ogg.

    Anti SCO T-Shirt. $1 donated to OSI Fund on each shirt.

    1. Re:Finally by Anil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe someone can hack it so that you could use a wireless USB NIC on the USB2 port. I guess it depends on if the device has a usable USB output port or a crazy one that takes a customized USB converter cable (haven't seen enough pictures to tell).

    2. Re:Finally by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Maybe someone can hack it so that you could use a wireless USB NIC on the USB2 port.

      Use an Ethernet-to-wireless bridge (e.g. WET11) on the Ethernet port. No hacking required.

      Peter

    3. Re:Finally by upplepop · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might be interested in the Linksys Wireless-B Media Adapter. It uses 802.11b to distribute audio and images to your television. It includes a remote control used to control an GUI on your television.

  5. Re:first post! by tuffy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Of course, Ogg is good for Sonic|BLUE since they don't have to liscense an MPEG decoder for each player they sell, correct?
    All their players still have mp3 support, so some sort of MPEG decoding license is necessary. But the Vorbis support costs them nothing extra in licensing.
    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  6. I suffer from Linux user mentality by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny
    The site doesn't jive with Mozilla (all jumbled up and the menus/DHTML is attrocious), therefore the company must suck.

    Oh, it plays Ogg. Well, if't less then $20 I'll buy it!

    1. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by The+Salamander · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I wouldn't go that far... but if a company's website functions poorly it does reflect negatively on the company and its products.

      I know I am definiately less likely to purchase something if can't easily access information on their products.

  7. Competition rocks by squarooticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even though Digital Innovations got my money for being the first out of the gate with Neuros support for Ogg Vorbis, competition is always a good thing, and having more players that support Vorbis means lower prices and less potential for lock-in or obsolescence.

    Ogg Vorbis destroys MP3 in terms of quality, and is competitive with all of the newer proprietary codecs (e.g., AAC, MP3Pro, WMA) at high bitrates while providing much better performance than those at low bitrates (e.g., sub-64kbps).

    Don't let the intelligentsia decide whether Vorbis is the right codec for you or not: the free market will decide this question, and as a result of this development, that market just got more interesting.

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Competition rocks by grazzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      who cares about low bitrates, i want my cd-quality.

    2. Re:Competition rocks by tuffy · · Score: 5, Informative
      who cares about low bitrates, i want my cd-quality.

      Then encode to FLAC, which this new player also supports. FLAC is CD quality (completely lossless) at half the space and is a completely open format.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If this new Karma player can handle all the Vorbis quality rates and FLAC - out of the box - I'll be picking one up.

      We tested Karma with Vorbis bitrates up to 256Kbits/s VBR. Anyone using Vorbis at higher bitrates than that should IMO be using Flac.

      Peter

    4. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Moore, unfortunately, wasn't in the battery business. CPU power for audio decoding is an extremely solved problem; plain old electrical power is not. Batteries have come on a lot in recent years, but if I were playing Civilisation right now I'd still be having people research batteries, not CPUs.

      Peter

    5. Re:Competition rocks by phrenzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all respect to the cool Xiph guys, porting Tremor to an embedded platform was a complete bitch. Well, a semi bitch at least. It's clear that the format was not designed with small architectures in mind (some of the comments in the source seem to confirm this). A few questionable design choices have definitely set this format back in terms of CE adoption.

      There's no problem that can't be overcome in time though.

      Rob

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    6. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      And, as long as I'm pestering a Rio employee, how is the ethernet support going to work?

      You plug it in. If there's a DHCP server, it DHCPs, otherwise it autonets (UPnP-styley). Then it announces itself over SSDP multicast. If you're using Windows XP Home (or anything else that talks SSDP -- it's a completely open standard) an icon pops up in Network Neighbourhood. If you're using other sorts of Windows, an icon pops up in our own transfer software. Otherwise, you just point a web browser at it: there's a web server in it which will serve you a completely cross-platform Java applet to do your transfers.

      I don't know whether we'll be actively helping the open-source community to implement the Ethernet protocol this time, but it certainly wouldn't be rocket science to reverse-engineer it.

      Peter

  8. Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using ethernet to transfer the data seems like it's a great idea and long overdue in the portable media player market...

    Although with the advent of firewire and usb2.1, it doesn't seem that big anymore

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Informative

      insightful?

      Um, neither usb or firewire are rated for the distances of ethernet [cat5]. I think *that* is the point. E.g. your computer in one room and the home stereo + tv + stuff in another.

      Plus you can get 30ft of cat5 for about as much as 6ft of usb retail [sick!]. :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by josquin00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I probably should RTFA more carefully, but I wonder if you can use this as a networked music server/file share, or if it only synchronizes to one machine? As someone who does freelance tech work, it'd be nice (read: fulfill my geek desires) to carry my toolset and my music all on one device.

  9. What's with the aesthetics? by ilsie · · Score: 3, Funny

    They all look like they were designed by Mike Brady.

  10. Slashdot Review: by mr_luc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slashdot review...

    Karma: Excellent

    Thank you.

  11. The RIO people are really cool. by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an old empeg. No longer made, but they still find time to make refinemenats toit. They are a bunch of linux geeks like the rest of us. Since Tremor (the fixed-point Ogg decoder) came out, there's not been any reason to not have Ogg. They've got a tight code base too, and if they can find the time, the old empeg people might get the capability to play Ogg, which is something I've been requesting a while. But these discontunued products are last on the priority list. The 3.0 alpha code plays on the player, and when it goes beta, we (empeg owners) might just get Ogg...

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:The RIO people are really cool. by phrenzy · · Score: 4, Informative
      The 3.0 alpha code plays on the player, and when it goes beta, we (empeg owners) might just get Ogg..

      You bet - Karma builds from the same codebase as the car player (although it runs eCos not Linux due to code size and lack of an MMU).

      3.0 already plays Ogg, and will get released when we're done with our seven (count em) new products. It's been a bit hectic around here lately!

      Rob
      (formerly of empeg, now Rio)

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
  12. ipod size comparison by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    RioKarma 20:
    20G 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.90 = 7.29 inch^3 5.5oz

    ipod specs
    10G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.62 = 6.10 inch^3 5.6oz
    15G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.62 = 6.10 inch^3 5.6oz
    30G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.73 = 7.18 inch^3 6.2oz

    So it's pretty comprable size-wise and breaks from the pcmcia 1.8" hard drive mold (0.20" x 2.13" x 3.37") that defines the ipod.

  13. A good MP3 player is more than technical gimmickry by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is great, just as long as Rio improve their build quality and service. I've had two Rio Volts; the first started pausing for no apparent reason. The second works, but is plagued by minor tics, a battery case that never stays shut, huge startup times, jumps in sound and skipping even when playing MP3s.

    After the third remote control broke, and I tried to buy a new one from Rio itself (rather than Amazon, where I bought it) it turned out that not only would they not ship items from their e-store, they would even accept a non-US credit card it (when I tried to buy and have it sent to a US friend to send on to me). Needless to say, I'm not impressed by a company quite happy to take foreigner's money while giving them a shoddy service.

    P.

  14. Re:Sounds good... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, it supports both WMA and MP3. FINALLY, a device that supports both WMA and MP3, in addition to Ogg Vorbis!!! (sarcasm intended)

  15. Drat! by bytesmythe · · Score: 4, Informative
    Trying to find a music player that does what I want is annoying. The closest I've seen so far is the Neuros, actually.

    The problem with the Karma here is it doesn't appear to have a radio tuner, unlike the Neuros. The Neuros also:

    • Broadcasts on a locally unused FM frequency so you can transmit it to a nearby radio.
    • Record and encode MP3s from any source (internal radio tuner or line-in). [I have been told that recording to OGG is a possible future firmware update.]
    • The syncing software is being ported to linux.
    • If they come out with a higher capacity, you just get a new storage "backpack". No need to buy an entirely new unit.

    The main thing the Neuros doesn't have that I would like is a line-out, but oh well. It does nearly everything else I'd want.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  16. Powerful tools include cross-fader... by jalano · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Powerful tools include cross-fader..."


    Does this mean we *finally* have a portable mp3 player (non-cd based) that can play back gapless recordings? This is one of the few features that has held me back from buying an iPod.

    1. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by phrenzy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does this mean we *finally* have a portable mp3 player (non-cd based) that can play back gapless recordings?

      It plays gapless anyway, unless your encoder has inserted masses of blank frames (which you can trim with various utilities).

      The cross fader is for radio style mixes, which works particularly well if you're on random playback from your entire music collection. The last few seconds of the current track will cross fade into the first few seconds of the next track - I leave this switched on most of the time now. You would turn it off for continuous mixes though.

      Rob

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    2. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have one? He is one. We build a Slashdot astroturfing bot into each unit -- that's what the Ethernet is for.

      Peter

  17. You get to use Ogg too... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but someone else may donate twice what your share should have been.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  18. Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptance? by willll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The answer to this question is irrelevant. The real question is "Is Ogg Vorbis gaining consumer acceptance?" It doesn't matter if the music industry thinks Ogg Vorbis is good, as long as consumers aren't using it. And the answer to the question is a definite no. How many people talk about ogg sharing, the same way they talk about mp3 sharing? How many casual music downloaders have heard of Ogg Vorbis, let alone know what it is? As long as these numbers are low, products for playing ogg files will fail, and the industries acceptance of Ogg Vorbis won't matter, until consumers play ogg's instead of mp3's, and know that they are using ogg's.

  19. Re:Sounds good... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anybody actually have any WMA files? That contain music? That they actually listen to? I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA. Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  20. FLAC Support Too by asv108 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the Rio Homepage

    Powerful tools include cross-fader, 5-band parametric equalizer, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC support, and a huge, backlit display capable of visualizations, animated menus, and 16 shades of gray.

    Now this is a reason to celebrate! I can get rid of my audiotron and my portable for one system that supports OGG and FLAC. FLAC support is huge for the thousands of people who download and share legal lossless music.

    1. Re:FLAC Support Too by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now this is a reason to celebrate!

      I totally agree. I discovered FLAC about a month ago.

      I'm now in the process of re-ripping my entire CD collection.

      Even vs. MP3 at 320bps there's a huge difference.

      I can hear harmonics I couldn't hear before. I can hear the singer breathing. I can hear the clicking of loose piano keys.

      It makes the music come alive.

      I ain't never going back. :)

  21. The eternal question by rolocroz · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does it play...oh, never mind.

    --

    I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

  22. Run, Slashdotters, run! by SandSpider · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quickly! To the Stores! Or to the Online Merchant of Your Choice!

    Since this is exactly what you've been calling for, I expect this thing to outsell the iPod in a week or two. I mean, Ogg Vorbis is the super format that's been the only thing keeping a legion of geeks from buying an MP3 player, right? Go hang a salami...I mean, hang Interface and Availablity, it's all about the Ogg.

    Mind you, if this doesn't sell like hotcakes, well, Vorbis won't have been quite the driving market force that you'd been preaching, will it? So you might want to by 5, just in case. Don't worry, if the market's there, you'll be able to sell them on ebay, sometimes for more than you'd bought them for. If the iPod is any benchmark, that is.

    =Brian

    --
    There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    1. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by SandSpider · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can't be serious.


      Well, exactly.

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    2. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Apple's iPod reeks of great design and simplicity. By the looks of it, that device doesn't."

      Except that it's ligher, cheaper, smaller, plays OGG/FLAC, and has ethernet built in. Oh, and it's compatible with Linux too.

      Now, I agree that outselling the iPod is an unrealistic goal. But that has to do with the fact that the iPod has become a very strong brand, not the design of the device.

      Remember, Rio is a well known brand too.

  23. Re:music length by phrenzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now if only the battery would last longer than 2.5 minutes

    15 hours in fact - c'mon, it's a very small gadget and hard disks suck current! A certain other well known player only manages 8 hours.

    Rob

    --
    -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
  24. Re:first post! by Chrontius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, you got me there, but it's still going to be a feature that most geeks consider when they look at the Rio players, which makes it a Good Thing(tm) for them to do.

  25. Re:Sounds good... by grennis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does anybody actually have any WMA files?

    Yes

    That contain music?

    Yes

    That they actually listen to?

    I have my whole 300 CD music collection ripped to WMA. (You can just turn off DRM).

    I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA.

    That is a silly thing to say... its called Windows Media Player (duh)

    Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?

    With WMP 9: Better compression, better audio quality, and, like you said, universal and total support. I guess when you say "nobody" you mean "nobody except the 95% of users out there running Windows"

  26. Now that we finally have an ogg media player by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about we finally get ogg support in digital video players, too?

    More and more video is being encoded as OGM (Ogg Media Stream) which usually involves xvid-encoded video and ogg-encoded audio; I can attest that the quality is superb but there is one clear downfall: at this moment, no DVD player or portable media device can play the format, thus requiring you to watch such encoded video on your computer.

    I look at this development as good progress towards finally getting something that supports both ogg and xvid out of the box.

  27. Ethernet dock; USB 2.0 actually by steveha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to several articles I have read, such as the one on gizmodo.com, the Rio Karma will have USB 2.0 as its native interface; it will also come with a dock that will plug into an Ethernet network.

    If you can just use standard file server protocols (NFS or SMB, I don't care) to put files on the Karma, I will buy one. If you have to run some modified jukebox app to move the files, so it can wrap your files in DRM junk, I won't buy one.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  28. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by iabervon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The consumer has already come to think of "mp3" as short for compressed digital music. This doesn't mean that Vorbis doesn't have a chance, though. Once the industry has accepted it, consumers will use it, even if they don't realize that their "mp3"s aren't actually mp3 at all. People will download and play Ogg files without knowing the technical details. People already don't know the difference between avi, wmv, and mpg, and really don't know that there are tons of different sorts of mpegs; there's no reason audio won't be the same, with nobody understanding or caring what format they're using, so long as it works, and always calling it "mp3" regardless of what it is.

  29. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Steev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MP3 is just another word in most people's vocabularies now. It's similar to "Kleenex vs. tissue" or "Q-Tip vs. cotton swab". When people say to go download an MP3, they really mean download some music in miscellanious format.

    I would sooner take an ogg than an mp3 anyday though ;)

  30. Re:Sounds good... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Does anybody actually have any WMA files? That contain music? That they actually listen to? I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA. Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?"

    I always transcode to WMA when transferring files to my 64MB Nomad II MG. Since it only supports MP3, WAV and WMA, the best quality at low bitrate of those three is WMA. Of course my originals are in FLAC or OGG. So basically I'm saying that WMA is generally there because it has better low bitrate performance than MP3. Of course OGG blows all that away so they probably included it 'by tradition' in the karma player.

    As to encoding to WMA, it's very common if you're using windows. Most major rip/encode programs will let you encode to it if you look through the options. I just use WinAMP's WMA output plugin myself.

  31. Palm devices play Oggs by Steev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been listening to ogg vorbis files for months now using my Palm Zire 71 and Aeroplayer. I got myself a 256 Meg SD card and I was off to the races.

  32. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by bogado · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me remember, in the early days of the internet when the people with internet access were lucky and most geeks used BBS system. The clueless people here in brasil would call any image of gif. There were BBS with a gif download dir, usualy filled with porn jpegs.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  33. Re:Sounds good... by GreyWanderingRogue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Careful with this one. The response to this one is fairly obvious. A program that rips CD's to WMA? It's called Media Player. After updating to MP9 (desire to have everything up-to-date is still too hard to resist, even though I rarely use it; and, yes, I realize I'm using Windows XP), upon my first use it asked if I wanted to convert all of my MP3's to WMA. The first time I put in a CD, it asked if I wanted to always have Media Player rip the CD to WMA files automatically. (Both of which I declined.) Because these are default settings, the average click-yes/ok-to-everything-user is bound to start having a collection of WMA files (or at least those who actually purchase CD's and don't just download all their music). Because MP3's were around first, people recognize what they are. If given a choice by a program (Rip to MP3 or WMA or even OGG for that matter), they recognize MP3 and will select it, which is why it's still the defacto standard. WMA is starting to dent that, though. If my memory is correct, it helps that you can't rip to MP3 directly. If you want MP3's, it links you to a site with plug-ins for purchase that can handle the MP3 format. As you might guess, most people aren't looking to pay for the software to listen to their encoded music.

  34. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Yort · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The consumer has already come to think of "mp3" as short for compressed digital music.

    Exactly. If the industry supports it, it stands a good chance to get used because people don't really care for the most part. All they care about is that when they click on the link, it plays in their player of choice. Or that if they look up download a Dave Matthews Band song from Kazaa, it plays in their portable player.

    Now that many of the major PC-players and portable players are supporting Ogg, it won't matter if a site/person/whoever is offering something in MP3, WMA, AAC, Ogg - to the end user, if it works, it's great.

    And hey, if this song over here with the .ogg (as if they ever see 3-letter extensions in Windoze) sounds better than the one with .mp3, I'll go with that one. And if I can fit 35 songs from this place that has "Oggs" compared to 30 from this other place onto my 128MB player...

    I picked up a Neuros and am loving it. Still needs some work, but they seem to be pretty connected to their user community, which is nice.

  35. Re:Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't blame them. If the hard drive manufacturers got it right in the first place it would all be so much easier. But hard drive manufacturers use the 1GB = 1x10^9 definition to start with.

    Maybe they should re-market the Karmas as 18.62GB and 37.25GB units respectively. Doesn't have quite the same ring to it, does it?

    And that wouldn't exactly make price comparisons with any other manufacturers easy - Apple, Creative and Neuros all use the drive manufacturers definitions too. Why should Rio be expected to get it right at the expense of sales?

    At least they are being honest and letting people know that the definition isn't strictly correct. I bet that Apple etc. don't.

  36. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by quantaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The answer to this question is irrelevant. The real question is "Is Ogg Vorbis gaining consumer acceptance?" It doesn't matter if the music industry thinks Ogg Vorbis is good, as long as consumers aren't using it.

    You would think that is how it should work but (un?)fortunately it doesn't. If a ogg is going to be accepted by the consumer that means the industry has to support it first because they control the vast majority of the infrastructure used to play music. Consumers other than us geeks aren't going to use ogg unless the big media players allow you to play it and rip to it and it becomes available in download services. I can say I never even heard of ACC until the Apple Music Store. Industry leads and the consumers may or may not choose to follow, that's how it works.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  37. Context Sensitive Meaning by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The label of being "hackable" makes the device more desirable for a lot of us.

    "Hackable"

    A definite good thing in this forum, where the difference between a hacker and a cracker is appreciated. And someone who deliberately makes hardware that is flexible is appreciated, not scorned.

    But in the world at large, hackable is regarded as a negative attribute, something that allows vague unknown bad people to do bad things to MyComputer.

    It's sad that there is such a large gap in understanding what "hackable" means between the inside expert press and the world at large.

    Someone with a loud voice ought to educate the masses with some kind of analogy to cars with locked hoods being unhackable.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Context Sensitive Meaning by ediron2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm in the midst of cowriting a report today, and one of the other authors tweaked that nerve by misusing 'Hacker'. My first thought (find & give author my 'come-to-jesus' speech) evaporated quickly because I know he knows the proper meaning. Fact is, he used it because it's what lay people perceive as the word's meaning. I almost never follow up on improper use of the term any more.

      But my second thought was that we're in part to blame. No doctor, lawyer, engineer, dentist, vet, activist, politician, soldier, plumber, electrician, or telephone-handset-sanitizer in the world would let lay people corrupt their jargon. My dentist still calls that shit on my teeth calculus, despite my knowing he had to take a couple semesters of that math subject to get into grad school to become a dentist. My lawyer doesn't refer to his peers as sharks and money-grubbin' ambulance chasers. He says "Counsellor". So, I'm officially going to go back to tilting at windmills. A cracker, an intruder, an assailant of networks... but never a Hacker. I'm a Hacker. A damn good one. Don't use the term unless you know what it means!

      Oh, and I'm puttin' my white hat away. Never liked the damn thing...

      ob-sig: yeah yeah yeah, Off-topic, but at least I knew enough to click the 'no bonus' boxes.

  38. iRiver too by GarfBond · · Score: 2, Informative
    Visiting the site in Mozilla breaks (firebird nightly and moz1.4), but Opera 7.11 on Win seems to work just fine, for those of you refusing to hit up IE.

    For what it's worth, iRiver (the same people who make the original RioVolt line and the current SlimX and flashplayer things you find at Bestbuy) just made a news release detailing their Ogg efforts. http://www.iriver.com/company/news_view.asp?idx=34 7

    Essentially what they're saying is that Tremor is too big for their embedded devices (read: CD players and flash players). I suppose this can be an excusable claim, depending on the device. However, I'm really disappointed their hard drive doesn't include Ogg support, as a hard drive is a bigger and heaver item, and it shouldn't hurt too much for them to include Ogg support on the ROM.

  39. ThinkPad by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Informative

    an old Thinkpad makes a great networked Ogg Vorbis player and second hand it costs less than this toy, but it is a wee lil'bit bigger...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  40. Re:Tradeoffs... by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Anybody else think this way, or am I in the minority?

    Well, I see your point but your criticism of this device as overpriced may be undeserved because you're considering using it only in a limited way, and it's capable of much more than playing an hour or two of music. For the applications you've described, a $100 device may be more appropriate, but this item is targeted at a different audience. We're talking about 40 GIGS of storage -- approximately 400 CD's worth of music (12 tracks each), or approx. 250 hours of sound!

    Imagine it as the center of your music listening experience -- a device you take with and plug into a home/office stereo or car audio system, or simply listen to it as a portable device. Plus, of course, it's a portable hard drive for moving data from one system to another.

  41. Re:To gain acceptance it needs a better name. by Anders · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Marketing folks must hate putting "Ogg Vorbis" on things.

    Do we need this one every time?

    Names do not matter. If they did, MP3 and MS-DOS would hardly have caught on. At least you can sort-of pronounce Ogg Vorbis, rather than having to spell it.

  42. Re:Ogg Vorbis Power Consumption? by cbiffle · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a word, no.

    I play both regularly on my iPaq (200mhz ARM). Using the libmad decoder for MP3 and Nicholas Pitre's integerized Ogg library (NOT tremor), I see about 10% utilization for MP3, and 8-10% for Ogg. (I say 8-10 as conservative padding. In practice, believe it or no, Vorbis always hangs lower.)

    Keep in mind that the libvorbis libraries most folks use are a reference implementation. Once Vorbis is properly optimized, it's really quite light on the resources. These guys are probably using tremor, which I personally haven't tried, but I've heard people say it's even lighter than the Pitre decoder.

  43. source code? by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the least a company who implements the Ogg Vorbis protocol should do is donate some small percentage of profits from each sale to xiph.org to support continued development. Not that they have to (do to it being patent and royalty free) but it would be a nice gesture.

    Is Rio required by the Ogg Vorbis license agreement to release the microcode they used to implement this protocol? It would be interesting to see what kind of optimizations they used such as special DSP instructions.

    1. Re:source code? by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is Rio required by the Ogg Vorbis license agreement to release the microcode they used to implement this protocol?

      No, it's BSD-licensed.

      It would be interesting to see what kind of optimizations they used such as special DSP instructions.

      Actually we use the Tremor (integerised) Vorbis library almost completely stock -- it already came with optimisations for ARM. The only thing we've really had to take a hitting thing to is its memory allocation.

      Peter

  44. Re:This is great, now I need Kenwood to catch on! by Josh+Coalson · · Score: 2, Informative
    The majority of my music listening time is spent between work and my commute. Listening to Ogg Vorbis files at work is easy, but once Kenwood (or another equally good car stereo manufacturer) gets on the Ogg bandwagon, I'll be more than happy to re-encode all my CDs to Ogg instead of MP3. Until I have a car CD player, I can't switch.

    Kenwood makes the MusicKeg, a rebranded Phatbox, which plays FLAC and I believe you can get firmware from PhatNoise to play Vorbis also. They are still working on optimizations to Tremor to play the highest quality levels smoothly.

    Josh

  45. Re:Ogg Vorbis Power Consumption? by pdh11 · · Score: 4, Informative
    These guys are probably using tremor

    Yup. It works out about the same CPU usage as MP3 for normal (64-128) bitrates, but seems to scale with bitrate a lot more than MP3 does; by the time you get to 256Kbits/s, Vorbis is really hard work.

    Peter

  46. Re:Pshhh... by Josh+Coalson · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Don't even tempt me until there's something that can play WAV.

    Why? It can play FLAC, which is lossless.

    Josh

  47. iPod comparison by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a specification comparison with an equivalently priced (both at $399) iPod... info from dapreview, an excellent respository of specs of hdd audio players which reported on the Karma aka "Pearl" months ago.

    iPod
    Capacity: 15GB
    Weight: 5.6 ounces
    Formats: MP3 AAC AIFF WAV
    Interfaces: Firewire 400
    Battery Life: "Over 8 hours"
    Extras: Games, Contacts, Calendar, Alarm, Sleep Timer, Clock, "20 equalizer settings"
    LCD: 160x128 backlit

    Karma
    Capacity: 20GB
    Weight: 5.5 ounces
    Formats: MP3 WMA OGG FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec making WAV not needed)
    Interfaces: USB 2 and Ethernet
    Battery Life: 15 hours
    Extras: Dynamic playlists, Dual RCA Line-Outs, 5 band equalizer
    LCD: 160x128 backlit

    Seems like if you want purely a music player that is conveniently-sized, supports OGG and has 25% more capacity than the iPod for the same price, the Karma is the way to go. The iPod's perks are tempting though, if you want more than just a music player.

  48. Re:To flog a dead horse.... by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Informative
    So is that actually usb 1.0 or 1.1 renamed as usb 2.0 (usb full speed) or usb high speed incorrectly labelled as usb 2.0?

    Without necessarily wishing to express an opinion on the nitwits who thought that that renaming was a good idea, Karma supports the 480Mbits/s variety of USB, or, as I'm tempted to call it, proper USB2. (That is, the wire speed is 480Mbits/s; you don't get the whole 60Mbytes/s in practice as that's more than the head rate of the winchester.)

    Peter

  49. Re:Ethernet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been following the design and subsequent release of the Karma, and I'm quite happy to say that it is indeed 100mbit. I have no idea why they don't mention that one their website. That feature alone is a big selling point for me.

    -Johnny

  50. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as long as consumers aren't using it. And the answer to the question is a definite no

    it's being picked up, more so than you'd think.

    Historically, formats like this start out underground (witness mp3 on IRC back in the day, or divx 3 years ago). But, reading places like the Divx forums, people are really starting to take notice of oggs. It's becomming integrated into the current view of compressed music.

    Just give it a little bit. It'll be popular.

    --
    sig?
  51. Immovable force vs. Irresistable object by nobodyman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine the conundrum: Slashdotter cannot be satisfied until making obligatory it-doesn't-have Ogg-support-so-I-wont-buy-it rant.... but it does have Ogg support.

    All we need now is for the Microsoft is to file a brief against SCO. Have you ever seen the movie Scanners?

  52. HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by Clockwurk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    In my case, I care more about Xiph than cancer research.

    Yeah, royalty free audio codecs are much more important than a cure for a horrible painful disease that kills millions. I'd would gladly give up years of my life (spent with friends and family) to keep programmers from having to pay for use of an audio codec. WHEN YOU ARE BURNING IN HELL, REMEMBER TO REQUEST THAT YOUR SOULS SCREAMS ARE RECORDED IN A PATENT FREE FORMAT.

    1. Re:HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by Trongy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Millions upon millions of dollars have been spent on cancer research over the last few decades and still no broadly useful cures are on the horizon. (Although better treatments have been devised which increase life expectancy of cancer sufferers). Many cancer deaths could be avoided very cost effectivly by lifestyle changes such as not smoking and having a healthy diet. If you really care about pain and suffering of millions, much money allocated to cancer research could probably be better spent on other programs targetting other conditions such as AIDS, malnutrition and whooping cough.

      A small donation to cancer research is unlikely to make much of a difference to one's quality of life, given the millions already spent by governments and private foundations.

      A donation to the Xiph foundation does not look good in comparison to a donation to a more altruistic cause like cancer research. However, a donation to the Xiph foundation is probably more cost effective than buying a product that contains an mp3 or MS codec paying a hidden license fee.

    2. Re:HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I give $500 bucks to cancer research, is that going to save the life or reduce the suffering of a single person by a measurable amount? I doubt it. So many billions are already being spent on cancer research that my $500 is not going to make much of a difference. OTOH, $500 to Xiph (or GNU, or the EFF, or to any open source project of your choice) will have a much larger and more immediate effect.

      Ideally, of course, you'd give to both causes, as well as reducing world hunger, curing AIDS, and whatever other good causes you can think of. However, if you don't have that much money, you have to prioritize based on where you think your money would do the most good. Personally, I'd give the money to feeding the poor, or somewhere else where it'd have an immediate tangible effect, and then donate my time to Xiph. However, just because there are potentially nobler causes doesn't mean you have to give every spare cent to them, or that you can't put your money where you see a greater benefit. A dollar for Xiph will do much more good than a dollar for the Boy Scouts, the Republican Party, Slashdot, or any of a number of other causes people give to quite readily.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  53. Re:SCREW Rio by altman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Download rio music manager 1.90 from www.rioaudio.com - and delete all your old drivers (ideally, the registry keys too). RMM 1.90 does work with 2k/XP and is rather a lot more stable than the old software, as this stuff was written from scratch for the S-series players - but we also added support for legacy players though it doesn't get shouted about much. It'll do WMA transfers no problem too.

    No reason not to provide source, etc? Licensing agreements and a $5k toolchain are probably enough of a disincentive for source release for the old Rio players.

    The 600 came from the US development office, which is no more. The UK office (ex-empeg) now does all the rio stuff; there was also a lot of turmoil surrounding sonicblue going away, so these two combine into the old stuff being slightly more orphaned than might otherwise be the case - but try getting support for a (say) 2 year old parallel port scanner; same deal...

  54. Re:Unicode? by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anybody know ANY portable player that is able to show UTF-8 encoded filenames and/or tags?

    Karma keeps all track information in UTF-8, and the transfer software fully understands UTF-8 and UTF-16 tags. Unfortunately the very first release of the Karma firmware won't have Unicode fonts, but we're currently intending to offer a subsequent free upgrade including glyphs for Cyrillic, Greek and Kanji. The Rio Nitrus (the 1.5Gb micro-hard-disk player which we've also just announced) has UTF-8 support including Cyrillic, Greek and Kanji from the word go.

    Peter