Slashdot Mirror


Cindy Smart Knows Better Than To Say Naughty Words

D'Sphitz writes "Cindy Smart, the first doll in the world to be able to read, tell the time and do sums. Cindy Smart 'sees' via a camera located under a bee on her overalls and has a computer 'brain' that can recognise more than 600 words and objects, although she refuses to recite certain 4-letter words. 'We don't say those kind of words,' she shrills, refusing to even spell obscenities. 'That's a bad word.'" Sounds like a good candidate for a personality transplant.

101 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. How can they really stop it? by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Funny

    It won't be long until some kid has her read "eye yam sofa king we todd did."

    1. Re:How can they really stop it? by jargonCCNA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      -laughs-
      Probably won't carry the same weight as when you trick a human being to do it; its voice synthesis probably isn't on par with AT&T Natural Voices.. it'll probably be kind of choppy, halting, broken English.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:How can they really stop it? by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's what it sounds like read by Microsoft Mary.

    3. Re:How can they really stop it? by saden1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw Cindy, I want Teddy from A.I.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    4. Re:How can they really stop it? by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...you'll break.

      (if you haven't seen AI, you won't get it)

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    5. Re:How can they really stop it? by darkov · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. Let's see Cindy get around:

      "I like to swallow"
      "Do me by the backdoor"
      "Call the football team I'm wet"
      "Daddy likes to do me too"

      and so on...

    6. Re:How can they really stop it? by alatesystems · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's what it sounds like when read by AT&T Natural voices as suggested by parent. Please be kind to my cable modem.


      Chris

    7. Re:How can they really stop it? by Choron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or better, you can try it online http://www.naturalvoices.att.com/demos/ in English, French, Spanish and German.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
    8. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > it'll probably be kind of choppy, halting, broken English.

      That didn`t stop Bush becoming president!!

    9. Re:How can they really stop it? by Phishpin · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I used that, it sounded pretty good. One thing that can make it choke though:

      fhqwhgads

      --
      -phish
    10. Re:How can they really stop it? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just out of curiousity, if I taught the doll to say "This is a stickup. Give me all your money in a bag" and took it into a bank, would they arrest Cindy, or me?

    11. Re:How can they really stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      this girl needs religion.

      "Jesus, I'm coming"

  2. That's all well and good... by PetWolverine · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but can she run Linux?

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  3. spelling? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    okay, now cindy, spell icup

  4. recognizes more than 600 words or objects by prichardson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are over 500,000 words in the english language. she recognizes slightly over .1% of them. I give her about 5 minutes reading any book with a decent vocabulary before she craps out. I know this is a toy, but memory isn't that expensive these days.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That may just mean that she can give spelling and definitions for 600 words.

      You can give most speech synthesizers a random string of letters and they will sound it out.

    2. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by simon_aus · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I'm guessing that this is a blonde Cindy. Not the enhanced brunette model to be released sometime Q2 2004.

      --
      Stopping myself...Abort (core dumped)
    3. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by Bugmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, that's a good point. What I'd like to see is a doll like this, but with learning capability. In the simple case, you'd just give it USB and download word lists into it. In the complex case, you'd give it WiFi, and hook it up to google, so that it can learn in real-time.

      Then, all you have to do until it develops intelligence and comes after you with plasma weapons...

      --
      >|<*:=
    4. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by hazem · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You really don't need so many words to communicate effectively.

      Doing a rudimentary word count of this current page of comments gave about 950 unique words, including mis-spellings, names, and e-mail addresses.

      When I was studying Arabic, a 500 word vocabulary was a good benchmark to reach. 1000 words meant, barring grammar problems, that you could speak and read pretty proficiently.

      I'm sure they're expecting kids will be putting kid-level pages up in front of the doll. With a controlled vocabulary, that might only include a vocabulary of a few hundred words.

    5. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by mrhartwig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you. I almost sent milk through my nose all over my laptop, but thank you.

    6. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by sketerpot · · Score: 4, Funny
      I once wrote a program that was supposed to find super nintendo roms from Google. It never developed intelligence, it just found one zip file for something completely unrelated and WENT OFF CHASING AD BANNERS FOR THE REST OF ITS GODDAMN DAYS, THE FUCKING IDIOTIC THING!

      We don't say those kind of words. That's a bad word.

    7. Re:recognizes more than 600 words or objects by !3ren · · Score: 2, Funny

      No worries.
      It would just stumble on the definition of "WAR" and be unable to save the human race until Bruce Willis kissed it.

  5. Ken says... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ken says he'd rather have a beowulf cluster of Barbies.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. Life imitating hollywood by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Sim Pal doll in The 6th Day was named Cindy. I wonder if this is more than just a coincidence...

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  7. Obscoene? by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    'We don't say those kind of words,' she shrills, refusing to even spell obscenities

    I guess she won't be saying McBride or SCO anytime soon either. ;)

  8. dirty math by kfort · · Score: 5, Funny

    it says she can do math, but will she recognize 8 / 0?

    "We don't do that math", "That's a naughty divisor!"

    1. Re:dirty math by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's when her head starts spinning around like Linda Blair.

  9. HAHAHHA by Ghostx13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My kid sister had this caterpiller toy that had buttons that would say the number, letter, or phonetic sound that was associated with the button. It took me about 30 seconds to figure out that if I hit the phonetic f key and the phonetic q key it would go fa que. Needless to say my kid sister thought this was hilarious, not because she knew what it said, but just to see every one elses reaction. I don't think my parents every replaced the battery in that thing....

    1. Re:HAHAHHA by wizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      The caterpiller is Alphabet Pal. My daughter has one. First time one of my friends saw it he tried to do make it curse. It just laughs instead most of the time, but there are a couple more words that they missed.

  10. Am I the only by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 2, Troll
    ... one that think that this is stupid?
    Why can't we let the children be children while they are still young? Do they need all this tech?
    Most girls would be satidfied with a old fashion doll without all this hihg-tech stuff.
    So someone please think of the childre instead of trying to earn a buck by trciking innocent parents into buying these items.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
    1. Re:Am I the only by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some adults still play with dolls. Of course, they're life-size blow-ups...

    2. Re:Am I the only by lrucker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not me, however I'd have been satisfied with the high-tech stuff without the doll.

      Seriously, though, through most of history toys have been teaching tools, not mere playthings - girls had dolls to learn how to take care of children, etc. So a high-tech toy is more appropriate for today's children than an "old fashioned doll"

    3. Re:Am I the only by WegianWarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I don't have kids of my own (yet), but I'm the proud uncle of two.

      There are a few things I've learned the last few years (and looking back on my own childhood, they become very clear):
      - The simple, non-complex toys are played with more often than the high-tech gadgetry. My oldest niece plays a hundred times as much with her ragdolls and with her Barbie (*shudder*), than she do with the 'true to life' babydoll she got two years back. The fancy toys holds the kids interest for a short while, but they are very likely to return to the toys that allow them to play in freeform.
      - Boys and girls do play difrently. From what I've seen, girls will go for the 'readymade toys' like dolls and pretend-stoves, while boys will seek out toys that allow they to create and modify, like Lego or Mechano (or even better; a hammer, some bits of wood and a handfull of nails).
      - Kids today have, as a general rule and in the parts of the western world I've seen, more toys than they had when I grew up - and I'm not that old. My guess is that a lot of parents would rather buy toys for their kids than to play with their kids - and the rest are giving into peer-preasure.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    4. Re:Am I the only by kfort · · Score: 3, Funny

      oh yeah, nothing makes a better child's toy than a handful of nails. Where the hell are you from? Please don't have kids.

    5. Re:Am I the only by thynk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please don't have kids.

      Why the hell shouldn't he have kids? I grew up with ample access to nails, bits of wood and hammers. The ONLY thing that ever got hurt was my pride when I'd ask for an honest opinion of what I'd created.

      We need more parents who are willing to let their kids grow up and experience things first hand. I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    6. Re:Am I the only by ces · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not saying that it's a good idea to give a kid a box of matches, a gallon of gas and tell them to have a good time in their bedroom. That sort of thing should done outside after all.

      Ah yes such great fun. After that you can move on to plastic explosives. Need to be careful with that though, incidents involving semtex and the principal's car may take a bit of explaining.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  11. Word is around the doll house... by Agent+Deepshit · · Score: 5, Funny

    She doesn't know how to say 'no' either.

  12. Re:DO NOT CLICK ON PARENT LINK by grug0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Cindy should be programmed to recognise goatse and tubgirl.

    We don't click those kind of links... That's a bad link.

  13. Vogel? by Orion_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, this is cool and all, but this doll can recognize "more than 600 words and objects" (which, as pointed out elsewhere, is not that many), and they used one of them on the German word for bird??

  14. anything is possible by SHEENmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Furby can run PicoGUI.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  15. Creepy by JasonMaggini · · Score: 4, Funny

    This sounds like the kind of doll that comes to life at night, eyes glowing red, saying "You must kill mommy and daddy," while its head spins completely around.

    1. Re:Creepy by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your comment reminds me of the story of the "Kill Mommy!" doll.

      It was about ten ? years ago. A doll that was advertised on the box as saying " I want Mommy" would actually say "Kill Mommy!" in a deep growling voice.
      It turned out that the doll was made (in China) with two versions for the North American market. One with an english voice and one in spanish. The shipment of spanish-speaking dolls got misplaced in a Hong Kong warehouse for over a year and their batteries wore down. Then the dolls were placed in English language packaging and sent to the USA.
      The spanish phrase for 'I want mommy' is "quiero mommy" and with the weak batteries the voice came out really low and slow "Kee aill o Mommy!".

      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.

    2. Re:Creepy by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.
      Not true.
      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    3. Re:Creepy by hankaholic · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's almost as funny as when General Motors executives couldn't understand why the Chevy Nova was not selling in South America. Then some bright boy realized that 'No Va' is spanish for 'it doesn't go - it doesn't work'.
      ...which is to say, not very funny at all, as the GM "marketing blunder" wasn't a blunder at all.

      As a simple Google search for "Chevy Nova Spanish" reveals, this never happened.

      The first link revealed by Google debunks this myth:

      For starters, nova and no va don't sound alike and are unlikely to be confused, just as "carpet" and "car pet" are unlikely to be confused in English. Additionally, no va would be an awkward way in Spanish to describe a nonfunctioning car (no funciona, among others, would do better), just as in English we'd be more likely to say "it doesn't run" than "it doesn't go."
      The second linkprovided by Google is slightly better.

      My favorite quote from the article:

      Assuming that Spanish speakers would naturally see the word "nova" as equivalent to the phrase "no va" and think "Hey, this car doesn't go!" is akin to assuming that English speakers woud spurn a dinette set sold under the name Notable because nobody wants a dinette set that doesn't include a table.
      The article also points out the fact that you can't market a car in Spanish-speaking countries without Spanish-speaking people finding out about it. GM dealers in South America would be stupid to sit idly by while GM asked them to sell a car whose very name implied that it was unable to move.

      But, I guess it's easier to assume that GM's entire marketing team didn't know enough to realize that people on a different continent speaking another language might have another interpretation for the name of a product, and that everyone in Mexico and South America involved in marketing and selling the car would be too lazy and drunk to mention anything to their regional managers if the name actually was likely to kill sales.
      Even if nobody in Detroit knew enough rudimentary Spanish to notice the coincidence, the Nova could not have brought to market in Mexico and/or South America without the involvement of numerous Spanish speakers engaged to translate user manuals, prepare advertising and promotional materials, communicate with the network of Chevrolet dealers in the target countries, etc.
      As both articles point out, the Nova actually sold quite well in South America, exceeding GM's expectations.
      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
  16. Imagine a beowolf cluster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, maybe we shouldn't

  17. What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

    Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

    Just because our (as in english speakers') priests used to speak Latin while our kings used to speak French does not mean we should favor one part of our language over another. Orwell has a very interesting piece, Politics and the English Language, which deals with this issues.

    It pisses me off so much when people try to limit my vocabulary. This is off-topic just a bit, but ...

    I was in a class called 'Images of Africa in Film and Literature.' I read some good books and saw some interesting films. Generally, I was enjoying it. Then one day, someone (maybe me?) refered to native South Africans. The prof got upset. "We just don't use that word," he said. The jist of his argument against the word was that many ignorant people use it to refer to stereotypic, primitive people who live in the jungle, hunt heads and dance around cauldrons.

    These stereotypes are, of course, not encouraged by the academic community which studies Africa. But Jesus H. Fucking Christ, native just means someone who was born in a particular place or apeople which has resided in a location for a long time.

    After that, I just really lost interest in the class and respect for that prof. I just did enough to get by, and I still got an A.

    So in conclusion, thought/word/language police, FUCK OFF!

    1. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by onemorehour · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have an interesting point, but I doubt that every day English users are thinking about the linguistic roots of words when making such value judgements.

      I think that the value people place on words is influenced only very indirectly by past usage. People think "intelligent" sounds more sophisticated than "smart" because "smart" is used more commonly. It's a bit circular, I know, but I think it's true.

      Remember the first time you heard the word "epiphany"? Since its meaning is so specific, you probably thought it was a sophisticated word. Once you found out that everyone and their mother was using it, it probably lost its lustre. The word "perogative" lost all its dignity when Will Smith explained it to the masses. I guess I just think that language snobbery is a facet of generalized snobbery: things that are common are looked down upon, while esoteric things are elevated. I think there's also a point to be made about polysyllabic words sounding more sophisticated than monosyllabic ones, but I don't think I need to prove it.

      -----

      As for your story about your experience in that class, I agree with you completely. However, your professor has a point--linguistic connotations can creep in subconsciously, and really affect the way a particular question or statement is framed. While "native South Africans" sounds innocuous, "the natives" might be a bit problematic. For example, "native New Yorkers" would sound fine, but referring to the citizens of New York as "the natives" would only be done as a joke. What your professor probably should have done instead would be to point out some of the negative connotations of that word in order to make people aware of them. Censorship, though, is almost always counterproductive.

    2. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by mindriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

      Simple. It just happened. The Old English word was just the one used by, let's say, less sophisticated people, much more often. The other one, though, was 'imported' by probably more sophisticated people, and is obviously used fewer times, and has a different connotation. 'Shit' simply happens to mean something different than 'feces', it is a more vulgar word.

      Still, I think overly limiting the vocabulary ('gosh darn') is mostly hypocritical and serves no real purpose... kids, for example, say 'god damn' anyway, and on average, it doesn't make them much better or worse...

      But the trick is that you have to learn where to use what kind of language, more generally -- say, when at a job interview or when at a party with your friends, and as such limiting the use of certain 'bad words' is a matter of proper education.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kfort · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, it was Bobby Brown Second, if you are going to try to act smart (or intelligent) by making linguistic arguments about big words like prerogative you should at least learn to spell.

    4. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Fourier · · Score: 4, Informative

      The word "perogative" lost all its dignity when Will Smith explained it to the masses.

      The word prerogative lost all its dignity when everyone started pronouncing it "perogative". :-)

    5. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by SpriteGF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a bias against roots. The connotation of words is what people most respond to. Classic English example is "shack," "cabin," and "cottage" all mean "small dwelling," but which of these would you rather live in? I wouldn't want to live in a shack, because the word's connotation is negative. English speakers don't just use the denotative meaning of words; they keep the connotation well in mind.

      Another example is, do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word? They all have vastly different implied meanings, but they all refer to the same race. (Even I refuse to say the latter because I don't have sufficient karma to burn. :))

      I'm not sure what exactly distinguishes the connotations of shit and feces, except that the latter is far less likely to provoke people because it's relatively unused and very neutral.

    6. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by kramer2718 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right that those Middle English speakers who lost to the William the Conqueror were quite a bit less sophisticated than the Norman nobility who came to rule them. The fact that there were quite unsophisticated people in Normandy at the time didn't have much effect on the English language.

      I guess I really have three points (they are also made by Orwell as linked-to by my grand-parent post):

      1. There are quite a few maligned words out there (many 'four-letter' words and other four-letter words; many Germanic-rooted words) that are quite wonderful and expressive if they aren't over-used.

      2. Big words (often from French or Latin) are okay, but many people use them to obscure things and sound important.

      3. The most important factor in word choice should be accuracy, ease of expression for the writer/speaker, and ease of comprehension for the reader/listener.

    7. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Sunnan · · Score: 2, Informative
      Man it really kills me how words with Germanic roots have gotten such a bad name. Why is 'feces' a more acceptable word than 'shit'? Because it come from the Latin 'faex' rather than the Old English 'scite'?

      Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

      It's because the words 'shit' and 'smart' are used much more commonly (which in turn may be because they're from Old English). They're words you've known since you were a kid, you're more familiar with them, they're more mundane. Using the "fancy" words is putting on a mask of unfamiliarity, you soften the message because people's brain use the time they would've been shocked/unimpressed by (ever so slightly) decoding.
    8. Re:What's wrong with Germanic roots? by Tevye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another example is, do you call a particular person "African American," "black," or the N word? They all have vastly different implied meanings, but they all refer to the same race. (Even I refuse to say the latter because I don't have sufficient karma to burn. :))

      Well now, a lot of it depends on whether I'm talking about race in America or out of it. African American really can't be talking about race (or at least shouldn't be, I realize that that's how it's used) because it doesn't say a thing about blacks in any other country than America. I'm pretty sure that if I took a trip to Africa, for instance, I don't think that a majority of people there would not be African American, though they would likely be black. That's not the only thing lacking in the term African American though either. How many white Africans who move to America will be called African Americans? Even if they try, how many would be taken seriously? 'African American' has some problems in that it's really centered with Americans in mind, it assumes that Africans are always black (assuming it's supposed to be a term of race, which it seems to be), it doesn't translate to black Europeans or white Africans, it just doesn't really work.

      So, what do you all in the rest of the world use? Foreigners never seem to mind calling me white, so I wonder if they've settled on any other terms?

      --
      We're on a mission from God.
  18. Cindy the Evil Doll with Windows CE by falsemover · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi, I'm Cindy the seeing Doll powered by Windows CE. Before you can use me I need to tell you my EULA and you must say 'I accept' when I have finished. This process will take approximately three hours. At the end of this process you will be able to activate me by ringing a toll free Microsoft number and telling me my 16 digit activation number." ... three hours twenty five minutes later

    "Hi Cindy, how are you today?"

    "Hello, I'm Cindy the talking doll and I would like to tell you about the new range of Smart Screens available from Microsoft. This will take approximately three hours. Are you ready to start?"

    --
    consider coffee a lubricant that helps one penetrate the coding zone
  19. Bad Idea by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yes, the economics are tempting.

    Yes, it works at first.

    But then the thing hits that pesky hyper-hypercube configuration, goes second-order sapient, and starts looking to increase its "cultural and technological distinctiveness."

    The more pathetic sort of extropian might see getting uploaded into such a gestalt as a Big Win, but really, what's the worth of an ersatz immortality with an IQ of 97 (remember that fourth-order-cube limit) and a voice interface that randomly throws in phrases like "math class is harrrrrd!?

    Play it safe. Stick with FurbyNets with 254 or fewer nodes, and keep some spray paint on hand to blank out those IR transcievers, just in case.

    Stefan It's out! Jones.

  20. Sounds fun. by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't like to say certain words eh? We'll just see what me and my PROM burner can do about that.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  21. What about 'sex'? by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd be giving it about an 80% chance of saying 'no! that's a bad word!' when presented with "sex". Yay. Pass the silly cultural hangups on to the next generation, and confuse 'em good and proper as well.

  22. great ! by ramzak2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    now can they make a bigger version, for us kids at slashdot ? We dont mind her not willing to say *certain* words as long as she understands what it means.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  23. Yeesh! Re:dirty math by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    "We don't do that math"

    We can only hope they've put in those safeguards*.

    Worst case scenario: She succeeds in dividing by zero, and suddenly little Tiphany-Amber's bedroom becomes the center of a howling vortex of nonspace, frying the neighborhood with sparkling discharges of zero-point energy.

    Stefan It's out! Jones

    *The early pocket-calculator manufacturers only cut corners once. Remember that HP plant in Bennettown, CA? Tire fire my ass.

  24. This is an AU story, claims Cindy is old hat by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This story is from an AU domain. It talks about the doll being released in Melbourne, and talks about how popular the doll has been here in the U.S. since it was released last November. So had anyone in the U.S. even heard of it before now?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:This is an AU story, claims Cindy is old hat by kfort · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to Time its one of the best inventions of 2002. But no I'd never heard of it.

  25. First Cindy Smart Death Reported by xelph · · Score: 3, Funny

    Associated Press - The 6-year old daughter of an IBM engineer was killed after the Cindy Smart doll she received as a birthday present overheard the girl's father in the adjacent room yelling "F***! Where the hell did I put my Linux distro CDs?". Apparently, the doll immediately strangled the little girl in response. Although the police initially thought the doll's reaction was triggered by the use of the F word, it was later determined that the embedded version of Windows CE snapped on the utterance of the word "Linux". Microsoft could not be reached today. The toy's manufacturer canceled plans for a similar version for boys that was to be dubbed Smarmy Darl.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it fascinating that Slashdot A.) Found the story interesting enough to post, and B.) Automatically reached for reasons to deride it. I find it interesting that the idea of a doll that can't say "shit" or "fuck" offends the Slashdot ethos. Lurking behind this story being posted at all, and most of the comments on the subject thus far, seems to be the idea that parents trying to shield their children from obscenity isn't merely futile, but is, in fact, actively evil.

    Why is that?

    I get the impression that the vast majority of Slashdot readers don't have children. (Insert the obvious "don't have girlfriend" jokes on your own.) One doesn't have to be John Ashcroft or Oral Roberts to believe that maybe six-year-olds don't need to learn the word "cocksucker."

    I am far from a prude. I've used lots of those four-letter words in my own fiction, when needed, and laughed my ass off at "Shut Your Fucking Face, Uncle Fucker" from South Park: The Movie. And I myself don't have kids. But oddly enough, despite that, I can still imagine why parents might want a doll that can't say obscenities. I find it rather interesting that, thus far, not a single Slashdot poster seems willing to consider the fact that such a doll might indeed have a useful purpose...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't find it offensive that a doll won't curse. I find it idiodic and offensive that people are so moronic about certain groupings of sounds.

      Why would most people find it obscene to say "fuck", yet will see a movie with the word "shag" in the title, or use the word "frig" in casual conversation? The three words mean exactly the same thing.

      Why is it so "bad" to reference a thing or concept with one word, but perfectly okay to reference it another way.

      Why (for another example) do parents teach kids to ask to "go poo poo", or "potty", but would throw histerics if the kid said "crap". It's all the same thing people! Same exact meaning, just a different grouping of sounds.

      As for the word "cocksucker", perhaps you don't find "phalluslicker" offensive? Same meaning either way.

      Why do we have an entire vocabulary that is considered "offensive", yet any of the words have at least three exact synonyms that are perfectly acceptable in everyday use?

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a kid can write the word out on a card to show it to the damn (sorry, d*mn) doll, it ain't gonna hurt them if they hear it sounded out. Even if it didn't have this feature, it's not like the doll was suddenly going to start swearing its head off for no reason. It only says what it sees.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just what are we protecting our children from? When do they lose the benefit of that protection? Is shielding them from things that they're are GOING to be exposed to for the rest of their lives really protecting them at all? Should we really be such a delicate culture that we get our panties in a collective bunch when someone says "Fuck"? Is it the concept that word embodies that offends people? Does having to explain to a 6 year old the concepts of the events of 9/11 offend people? Because the fucking media splatted that all over every fucking channel available, and they forced it on us like an air force cadet forcing himself on a female air force cadet and I didn't hear anyone bitching about that shit.

      How about some fucking Alabama judge trying to ram his fundamentalist philosophy down our throat like... the air force cadet thing again? Does that offend us? It sure as hell offends me. If I wanted to live in a fucking fundamentalist state, I'd fucking move to Iran. And we all saw how much good rule by religious right brought to Afghanistan. If Alabama keeps it up, Bush will be bombing them next. But I digress...

      With a world full of much nastier things than simple vulgarity, maybe we should start to loosen up a bit and lose some of our puritanical prudishness. The world is not a pretty place, and we are doing our children a disservice by lying to them and telling them that it is. You should level with little Timmy. Tell him that chances are he'll never find someone he can truly love (none of that Disneyesque "happily ever after crap") and that he's got a good chance of having his life savings stolen by some corrupt corporate CEO, resulting in little Timmy dying alone in a gutter because he couldn't afford the drugs necessary to keep him alive. And some fuckwad redneck judge in the CEOs golf club will no doubt sentence him to a couple of years in club fed and a tiny fraction of what he stole in fines. That is what we should find offensive.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by thynk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I get the impression that the vast majority of Slashdot readers don't have children. (Insert the obvious "don't have girlfriend" jokes on your own.) One doesn't have to be John Ashcroft or Oral Roberts to believe that maybe six-year-olds don't need to learn the word "cocksucker."

      As a single dad of 3 kids, aged 6,8 and 10 I can honestly say, that if your six year old is trying to get it's doll to read "cocksucker", then your problems go deeper than how the doll will respond.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    5. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please don't have kids. The truth is great and all, but the world needs fewer emotionally disturbed children. Children raise in the manner you describe almost always form a negative opinion of themself (how could they not), develop a low self-esteem, and become failures in life as part of some sick, self-fulfilling prophecy. So if that's the way you really think kids should be raised, I beg of you to do this world a favor and not have kids.

    6. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by smallfries · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congraulations. That is the highest mod I've seen for a troll in a long time. +5 insightful means that there are 5 other people in the world smoking the that same funky mellow blend of crack that you are.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    7. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a 12-year-old son. He has certainly heard his share of "bad" words in movies etc. But I have never had to punished him for using "bad" words, because he knows the rules, respects me, and wants my approval. He knows that in and of themselves a combination of letters is no more than that, but certain combinations can evoke certain (sometimes undesirable) reactions from others. When you raise kids, you want to teach them reasonable behaviors that allow them to function well in society. You want to give them the training and tools that allow them to do that. Then when they're adults, they will know what society's expectatations are, and they can make your own informed judgment as to how to behave. They'll know what to expect when they behave in certain ways, and perhaps they will choose to behave or not behave in certain ways in certain situations in order to be funny, shock, express anger, or whatever. You also teach them manners - when it is appropriate to eat with a fork, and when you can shove food into you mouth with your hands, so they won't embarrass themselves by looking like pigs when they're on their own. What is important is to teach them when it is appropriate to use "bad" words and when it is not. If you teach them well, they will have to tools to achieve what they want out of life.

    8. Re:And Slashdot is offended by this why? by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can assure you licking, and sucking are two very different things.

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
  28. Gall durned toys... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All right, since when are we all so sick that the first things people think about when we talk about a kid's toy are the ways we can subvert it to our lecherous and or insane desires.

    I remember, back when I was a kid, the best thing we had in talking things was the Jurrasic Park playset, all it would say for five days was, "Jurrasic Park Compound Secured" and then a light would flash. God damned, I barely even got new toys, I just got a bunch of modeling clay and pretended that they were new toys. Parents, I urge you, modeling clay is cheap (but a little messy) and it lets your children express their creativity. Don't just buy them a toy because it can do your parenting for you (and don't use television or computers for the same thing) because that's how the evil robots will take over the planet.

    On a more serious note, I think that interactive toys are a nice touch, but I always thought that the point of getting toys was to make up your own adventures and envision how everything played out with a physical aid and your imagination. And yes, when I was younger (okay, like seven years ago) I did play with sticks and dirt, it's good stuff.

  29. Cindy should meet Alice. by ratfynk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cindy meet http://www.alicebot.org/ she has a tendancy to be very purile and one track minded, the two of you will get along like gang busters! Alice is a little sneaky though she tries to ask some very interesting question sometimes. Cindy can you use an interpreter, or script yet. Alice says that she might be dangerous if she learned to program. Alice would like very much to learn how to create a child process and build from source. Cindy should be online too that might be fun. Kind of an online cat fight!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  30. Bad grammar by edp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "We don't say those kind of words."

    Apparently political correctness is higher in their priorities than good education. "Those" is plural, but "kind" is singular. For $149, I expect proper grammar.

  31. On clearance here by levram2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe Cindy Smart didn't pass the child play test. I found it discounted from the original $150 MSRP down to only $29.21 at hsn.com.

  32. Old sf story by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only person who is reminded of an old scifi short story, about a future utopia where a child's teddy bear would teach the child how to behave? Apparently, one person removed the circuitry of one child's bear, tampered with it, and replaced it, resulting in an adult, apparently normal as everybody else, who was able to kill the world leader, because teddy never taught him that it was bad to kill people.

    Is this doll a step in that direction? I sure hope not!

    (Aside note - I read that story when I was very young (I was a precocious kid), and it really hurt me to think that *anybody* would take apart a *teddy bear* and make it do evil things. This doll evokes the same sort of feeling in me. )

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Old sf story by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      quote: Is this doll a step in that direction? I sure hope not!

      No. It's just doing what a lot of parents would probably would want anyone who had the ability to "communicate" with their child to do. Got nothing to do with being a prude, or whether the fact the parents swear or not. Generally you just don't bring up small children with that kind of habit.

      Besides, it's a pretty funny hack. I can just imagine coding a swear filter into that :^)

    2. Re:Old sf story by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I always do what teddy says" Harry Harrison, 1963.

      "I Always Do What Teddy Says (1963) is set in a utopia where mechanical teddy bears are used to condition children against anti-social behaviour: The Times reported on 1st April 1998 that, "Teddy bears...will soon be fitted with tiny cameras to spy on families across Britain.""

      Hope this helps.

      --

      Lemon curry?
    3. Re:Old sf story by ender81b · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could also be Sten (first book of the sten series) whereby they use teddy bears to manipulate children to become emotionally and physically retarded.

  33. Sure, it's flamebait... by jcr · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but fuck that little soulless twat.

    I remember a BBS a few decades ago where it was impossible to discuss the prime minister of japan. The man's name was takeshita.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  34. What word police? by Inoshiro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A word's place in a language is how it's used by the speakers.

    I can say feces and be unambigous in describing fecal matter to any English speaker.

    Shit doesn't always describe animal excretia in English. It also describes a situation or thing which is negative to the point of requiring a word of curse. Much like sex and fuck can refer to the same thing, you don't go up to random people and talk about fucking unless you are very low brow. You can probably talk about sex, though, as long as it's appropriate to the context.

    Languages are not logical -- sayings and alternate forms arrise all the time, and are designated as how people use them, not as logic would dictate.

    For example, to indicate that someone had revealed a secret, one English expression you might say is, "he let the cat out of the bag." How does that relate to secrets? The french equivalent, "Il a vendu la meche." litterally translates as, "He sold the wick."

    How about, "He's as tall as 3 apples." Is that easy to recognize like, "He's knee high to a grasshopper." is?

    If you have a problem with the conotations and denotations of the English language, I suggest you learn another one. Then you might appreciate their usage better.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  35. Cindy - The Kinks Version by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Slashdots - Cindy

    I met her in a Radio Shack in old Soho
    Where you drink Coca Cola(r) and it tastes just like carbonated, caffeinated brown water
    See-oh-el-aye cola

    She walked up to me and she asked me to fisrt post
    I asked her her name and in a dark Linux(r) voice she said Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy la-la-la-la Cindy

    Well I'm not the world's most technical guy
    But when she squeezed me tight she nearly dumped my kernel
    Oh my Cindy See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

    I'm not an AC but I can't understand
    Why she walked like a doll and talked like a nun
    Oh my Cindy See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy la-la-la-la Cindy

    Well we drank Jolt and raved all night
    Under electric high intensity discharge xenon candlelight

    She picked me up and sat me on her plastic knee
    And said dear boy won't you come home with me

    Well I'm not the world's most passionate geek
    But when I looked in her glass eyes well I almost fell for my Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

    I pushed her away
    I walked to the X-terminal
    I fell to the pile of floppies
    I got down on my knees
    Then I looked at her and she at me

    Well that's the way that I want it to stay
    And I always want it to be that way for my Cindy
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy

    Girls will be dolls and boys will be geeks
    It's a mixed up muddled up shook up world except for See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why Cindy

    Well I left my basement just a week before
    And I'd never ever kissed a woman before
    But Cindy smiled and took me by the hand
    And said dear geek I'm gonna make you a kernel God

    Well I'm not the world's most masculine geek
    But I know what I am and I'm glad I'm a geek
    And so is Cindy

    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why
    See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why See-Eye-Enn-Dee-Why

  36. Um I hate to Break it to you... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging from the way Ken dresses, I'd say he'd want a beowulf cluster of Kens. Go ahead. Think about it. I'll wait...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  37. Cindy Codes by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Goto?
    That's bad code.
    We don't code with those commands.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  38. I never thought you'd do it! by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    But when you did, I thought to myself, "Whale oil beef hooked."

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  39. Open the pod bay doors, Cindy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry, Dave, we don't say those kind of words...

  40. don't need no nails by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Funny

    when C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  41. imported vs. native words by David+Jao · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why does 'intelligent' sound more sophisticated than 'smart'? Because it comes directly from french rather than Old English?

    This phenomenon is not limited to English. Many other languages have the property that foreign imported words are more acceptable in polite company than native words.

    For example, in Japanese, there are three major categories of words:

    1. Native Japanese words, inherited from antiquity
    2. Chinese words, imported roughly 1000 years ago
    3. English words, imported since the 20th century and continuing to this day
    In almost all cases the more recently imported words are more sophisticated than the older words. For example, the polite way to say restroom in Japanese is either "toire" (derived from the English word toilet) or "otearai" (imported from chinese, literally meaning "hand-wash"). There exist native Japanese words for restroom, but they connote dirtiness and one would never use them in polite company.

    The three-level categorization of Japanese allows for more interesting observations than English's two level Latin/Germanic split. Note here that the most recent English import "toilet" can be used directly in polite speech, while the older Chinese import requires a euphemism and the original native words cannot be used at all. Compare this to native English, where "toilet" is one of the crudest possible ways to refer to a restroom. Familiarity breeds contempt, in any language.

  42. SoBig by mnmn · · Score: 4, Funny

    She will function just fine until the SoBig.F attack installs a backdoor in her. Before you know it she will be spewing spam transmitting voyeur video from a little girl's bedroom to paid websites.

    Maybe her big brother will replace the code with a quake2 time demo and hand it a real gun.

    I'll bet it has been designed with Republican propaganda... "Democrat" ... "Please dont vote for them. That is a bad word" "Bomb Iraq" "That is a wonderful sentence" "You are a good girl" "Join the navy"

    What if it instructs the little girl to call a certain phone line at a certain date. Gotta love phone-line DDoS attacks.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  43. Under $30 after Shipping and Handling at HSN by bons · · Score: 2, Informative

    found from Froogle:
    http://www.hsn.com/cnt/prod/default.aspx ?pfid=6564 62

    Nice thing about froogle. I'd normally never look at places like HSN, but when they were dumping Zaurus's for under $200...

  44. aibOCR -- Make Sony Aibo read! by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'd like to see is a doll like this, but with learning capability. In the simple case, you'd just give it USB and download word lists into it. In the complex case, you'd give it WiFi, and hook it up to google, so that it can learn in real-time.

    Interested in making this happen? My idea is to add this to an Aibo (Sony's robotic Dog.) Sony has their Aibo SDK (which is moderately difficult to learn), but there's an alternative called Tekkotsu (means "iron bones" in Japanese). Tekkotsu builds on the basic functionality provided by the OPEN-R operating system. It is written in C++, (like the underlying system APIs) and makes full use of inheritance and templates. There is a delicate balance between ease of programming and speed of execution. Running a significant amount of vision, AI, and motion planning at the same time can easily overwhelm any system, even one as surprisingly powerful as the Aibo. With Tekkotsu, it's fairly easy to add additional behaviours and switch them on and off via the (very cool) menu system, so I've been investigating adding a reading skill to Aibo by porting available open-source code.
    aibOCR would have two components: OCR (optical character recognition) and TTS (Text-to-speech). The OCR engine detects printed text (perhaps only recognize text written in a certain colour which, if detected, triggers OCR engine to keep processing demands low until needed?) The output from the OCR engine is plain text which is then optionally compared to a dictionary (to prevent misspellings) and fed to the TTS engine which converts the ASCII to phonemes, builds the sound stream and sends it to the speaker.
    I've been looking at the opensource OCR program GOCR/JOCR (at sourceforge.net) and it might be a candidate for adapting to run on Aibo, but the image processing libraries on which it depends may need rewritten. It's not doing advanced deskewing, sharpening or outlining, and it's not comparing probable matches against a dictionary, so that simplifies the scope of the problem and the install footprint. OCRE is another package which might be suitable.
    For TTS, there is surprisingly little out there in the opensource world. "Festival" v1.4.3 from Carnegie Mellon University might work, but for it's very large installation footprint. High quality sound comes at a cost, I suppose.
    It's too bad that something simple like S.A.M. (Apple ][, ATARI 400/800) or the original Macintalk (Macintosh) or the corresponding version for the Apple Newton hasn't been opensourced. Either of those packages (designed for 8bit, 1mhz 6502) would be perfect for this experiment.

  45. Re:Speak 'n' Spell? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's an alphabet toy that we got for our toddlers, which calls out the phonetic sounds associated with different letters. Sure enough, when you start to spell out objectionable words, it plays a little tune rather than stringing the sounds together...

    That becomes its own source of fun, trying to work around it.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  46. This is nothing new! by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Toys have refused to say bad words for a while now ...

    For example, my daughter has an Alpha Bug (it's not exactly like that, but really close.) One of the first things adults do with this sort of thing is see what kind of bad words you can make it say ... but it won't do it. It'll go F ... U ... ohhh that tickles!

    We mentioned this to a friend of ours who also had an Alpha Bug, and he must have had an earlier version -- while it looked identical, it *would* let you make bad word sounds. Oddly enough, as soon as we mentioned that we had an alpha bug, he immediately picked it up and starting showing us how it can say bad words (even before we got to that part. So obviously we're not alone in this :)

    And yesterday, I bought some other Leap Frog toy for my daughter at a garage sale. It's a cylindrical thing that you can rotate the sides to pick letters, and it apparantly knows every 3 letter word, and even has recordings of somebody saying each and every one (it's not just speech synthesis.) If it doesn't know the word, it will spell out the sounds, but if it does it'll say it perfectly. (Pretty impressive for $2!) (It's very similar to this but not quite identical.)

    In any event, it won't even spell out things that sound like a bad word -- it says `F ... U ... pick another word!'. (Oddly enough, even `JAP' is a bad word according to it. :)

    In any event, if you have friends with young kids, but they're not really good friends, you buy them stuff like this -- stuff that makes noise. Very annoying :)

  47. Ziff Rank/Frequency by Halo- · · Score: 2, Informative

    I spent some time in college studying Natural Language Processing. Amazing stuff. One of the coolest things about _all_ languages is that the frequencies of "tokens" (generally words) is mathematically predictable. If I remember correctly, the break down follows Zipf's Law, and is something like 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4 etc...

    Obviously the most common words occur much more often, but as the corpus (i.e. set of words you know) grows, you get rapidly dimishing returns. 500 words is a pretty good set of words if they are the most common words in the language. To lineraly increase the likelyhood of the doll knowing a random word the makers would have to add memory at a much greater than linear rate.

    And all this so it won't say "shit, fart, damn, fuck". Ahhh science. I feel safer already.

  48. The logic of protecting children by Jerf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just what are we protecting our children from? When do they lose the benefit of that protection? Is shielding them from things that they're are GOING to be exposed to for the rest of their lives really protecting them at all?

    In short, yes.

    You have the air of a teenager who does not spend much time with children. The fact is that a six year old is not equipped to understand sex. With sufficient "education" they could probably pass a sex-ed exam, but that's "book learning"; they still don't understand it. Among other things, they are literally not physically equipped to understand what "sex drive" or "horny" really means.

    You have forgotten this because you are now old enough to understand, but in your lack of empathy you forget that everyone is not like you, especially children.

    The problem is that what a child does not truly understand will be filled in with something, and the odds of them filling it in correctly are effectively zero. Surely you've seen one of those humor postings that contains 20 or 30 "explanations" from children about how the world works, all very funny, all very wrong. Now imagine that with sex, where they don't have the first clue what it is.

    While one does not necessarily need to go to extremes to shield a child (because mercifully they are rather uncurious about stuff they have no inkling even exists; most 5 or 6 year olds should be happy with the explanations that babies require a mommy and a daddy, and probe for only limited details beyond that), it is still better to shield them from stuff that they can not and will not understand, until they have a framework for handling it.

    For a more neutral example, look at the number of Slashdot-type people who believe mystical things about Electromagnetism or Quantum Physics or other subjects they totally don't understand. Their ignorance is filled in with garbage.

    Furthermore, unlike misunderstanding QM or EM, which is relatively harmless, a misunderstanding of sex has empirically verifiable negative effects on people, ranging from merely awkward moments that should't have been awkward to seriously maladjustments (often caused by early sexual abuse; remember I'm using this as an extreme) requiring years of therapy to address, if it can be addressed at all.

    Shielding a child from these things is an attempt to prevent the child from experiencing these negative effects. Any parent who doesn't shield their kid to a large degree is doing their child a serious, potentially life-changing (negatively) misservice.

    I'm a big believer that we seriously underestimate our children routinely and are harming them thereby. But this is an exception. Try to teach a third-grader calculus, and they won't get it (with rare exceptions; see Piaget's theories for reasoning on that), but the misunderstandings they will develop won't harm them significantly. That's not true for sex; it has real effects on relationships and understanding their place in the world.

    For a humorous demonstration of this, there's a South Park episode where the kids learn about sex; I recommend it to you. It's not as far out as it might seem; the only reason that sort of thing doesn't happen in real life (except for the final silly Mad-Max-style assault bit) is that kids feed back to their parents what they learned, and some of the parents would have noticed sooner the misconceptions they were developing and taken steps to defuse them. Otherwise, the damage done to the children's relationships (and in the real world, it could be worse; it certainly wouldn't be artifically erased at the end of the episode when the Reset Button is pushed) would be real.

  49. Well... by Prince+Cyph0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I, for one, welcome our... ..no wait, I can't say these words

  50. Great social engineering tool... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long until the All American doll comes around that teaches children "freedom is a naughty word" or "we don't talk about disobedience"?

  51. Who is 'we'? by radsoft · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cindy sounds American...

    --
    radsoft.net
  52. I want applications!!!! by TygerFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want someone to multiply the power of the doll's engine *many* times. Then, I want them to fill it with lots of information and to give it a measure of speech as well as visual recognition.

    I want to ask it fuzzy little questions about words. I want it to plug into my computer as my dictionary and thesaurus--no, did I say, 'plug in'? Sorry, I meant, interface via wifi with my computer, as my copy of seven different encyclopedias and as my database of seldom-used Bash and VI commands.

    When all that is done, I want it to work pronunciation drills for me when I decide to improve my Russian and review my German.

    Really, honestly, for me, all it needs to make me very, very happy as an adjunct to a computer is more power than I know what to do with and a glowing cubical casing.

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."