Slashdot Mirror


Nordic Countries to Promote Open Source

Nordic Avenger writes "The Nordic countries have launched a website to promote open source software to consumers and small businesses. People can submit open source software links as well as exchange information in the forums section. As the website states: 'Nordicos.org is a project of the Nordic Ministerial Council, and addresses the need for a comprehensive overview of open source software available for consumers'. Now, anybody eager to make good suggestions about software that normal people could find useful and live happily ever after in the open source world?"

203 comments

  1. Be nice to their forums, damnit. by caferace · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Providing it doesn't get slashdotted into oblivion, their forums don't require registration. d'oh. Don't pee on a pristine Nordic landscape.

    -jim

    1. Re:Be nice to their forums, damnit. by gatesh8r · · Score: 1
      Don't pee on a pristine Nordic landscape.


      Yeah it might freeze...

      --
      Karma whorin' since 1999
  2. Beautiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another step in the right direction for humankind.

    Open source does not have enough a coordinated information (and marketing) websites that have enough clout. This effort, as long it is kept up and improved with time, would be a precious resource for the average citizen and consumer.

    1. Re:Beautiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a way to avoid braindamage.

      Having read that legal shemozzle (is there an opposite) on the Dell laptop slashdot article, paying a lawyer $250 an hour, to be told gibberish, I can understand the Nordic mind in picking somethingelse where the legal position is known, and won't change (fixed and absolute). MS is now smeared with the same SCO brush - don't do business with a potential litigant.

      By elimination, only IBM/BSD and Linux can be trusted. We don't like all that lawyer shit is a perfectly valid reason not to hire software (You can buy ms software anymore). Go Penguins.

  3. Re: JOBS by KoolDude · · Score: 5, Funny


    It looks like you are infected with the Programmer.NoJob.FUD32 virus. Please apply this patch immediately.

    Regards,
    admin@trollingfud.com

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
  4. Re:No way, Jose, I'm an American. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  5. Re:No way, Jose, I'm an American. by tuba_dude · · Score: 0

    I read that as "redhatted stepchild." It certainly would have been funnier that way.

    --
    "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
  6. It's all there! by gartogg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having finally installed Mandrake over my windows partition on my computer, I have to say; What Software?

    I mean, Under M$ WIndows, I had to find:
    An Office Suite (replaced by Open-office)
    A Programming Environment (Replaced by QT Designer)
    and about 30 small shareware/freeware managers for Zipfiles, PDF files, MP3's, Instant Messaging, IRC, Decent FTP Client, and A News reader.

    Everything was Included in the ISO's for Mandrake I burned. The only problem people switching over will have is trying to understand that whatever it is they need, it's (Usually) already installed!

    --
    I'm a concientious .sig objector.
    1. Re:It's all there! by Rectum2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're right, and I'd like to add something to it. I installed WindozeXP last week, and I noticed that fully patched with SP1 and Norton antivirus, the thing had a whoppin' 3.5 Gb. I tought: 3.5Gb and I just got media player and wordpad... When I install Linux on my box I usually do full install, for ~2.5Gb and I get an insane amount of software, anything I could think of 3 time each: 3 web browsers, 3 spreadsheets, tons of games, around 10 graphical environments... Where does all that space goes in windows??

    2. Re:It's all there! by eggstasy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >An Office Suite (replaced by Open-office)
      wordpad, calc and outlook express =P
      i dont have an office suite installed and i dont need it. im not an accountant, i dont use spreadsheets and wordpad or even write are more than i'll ever need in terms of text formatting.

      >A Programming Environment (Replaced by QT Designer)
      notepad :D

      >Zipfiles
      builtin to windows xp

      >PDF files
      isnt the acrobat reader plugin instamagically downloaded when you first browse to a pdf?

      >MP3's
      WMplayer

      >Instant Messaging
      MSN messenger

      >IRC
      telnet =P

      >Decent FTP Client
      ftp.exe IS a decent ftp client. i thought we linux freaks enjoyed working with the console?

      >and A News reader.
      Outlook express?

      I know what you mean but you went about it the wrong way. With mandrake, i slap on the cd, press a couple buttons and it Just Works.
      With windows, I need to either rummage through my thousands of CDs in a vain attempt to locate my drivers, or download them from a working puter.
      Why on earth arent most drivers included with windows anyway? All builtin windows drivers are always really old and crappy. Unless you have a severely outdated computer, windows will be a 16 color, soundless, webless hell upon first boot. Except for XP which finally seems to get that no one sane uses 16 colors anymore, or even 640x480.
      I was using 1024x768 at 256 colors 10 years ago on my 486 under windows 3.1!
      With Linux, you instantly get sound and pretty true colour graphics, unless you have some really weird incompatible hardware.

    3. Re:It's all there! by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why on earth arent most drivers included with windows anyway? All builtin windows drivers are always really old and crappy. Unless you have a severely outdated computer, windows will be a 16 color, soundless, webless hell upon first boot. Except for XP which finally seems to get that no one sane uses 16 colors anymore, or even 640x480.

      When a major MS release debuts, it is like that. When 98 first came out, chances were there would be a driver for every device in a then current PC. After about 6 months, it starts getting time to trawl through vendor websites for drivers. Pretty much the same thing happened when 2000 then XP came out.

      Remember, most people just go with OEM installs on their new PCs which will have all the drivers. Its the likes of us that set up systems with full install CDs and the latest drivers from the vendors. MS doesn't really have to cater self-installers on their full install media. Anyone using it probably has enough clue to go find drivers.

      Linux distros on the other hand attempt to provide you with everything you need. However, the trick there is to use a current distro CD. The same thing happens with distro CDs that happens with new major MS releases. They just occur more frequently.

    4. Re:It's all there! by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 1
      [everything works]...unless you have some really weird incompatible hardware

      Like one of those very uncommon and not ordinarily encountered CD-RW drives.

      --
      Proud patriot and republican voter.
    5. Re:It's all there! by cperciva · · Score: 1

      Why on earth arent most drivers included with windows anyway?

      They aren't? I guess I'd better go and find some drivers then, because when I installed Windows 2000 I just accepted the drivers Windows already had.

      Now, Windows does have the minor problem of not coming with drivers for hardware which hasn't been released yet; but I think you'll find the same problem with any operating system. (And with Windows, you can usually download drivers from Windows Update -- no need to search through piles of CDs.)

    6. Re:It's all there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >PDF files
      >isnt the acrobat reader plugin instamagically downloaded when you first browse to a pdf?
      >
      >IRC
      >telnet =P

      No, and no.

    7. Re:It's all there! by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2, Informative
      ftp.exe IS a decent ftp client

      I do hope you're kidding. FTP.EXE (still) does not support passive mode. The rest of the world's had that since before Windows had a TCP/IP stack.

    8. Re:It's all there! by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Somewhat ironic that Linux is now being praised for bundling everything out of the box--exactly what got MS in trouble (IE, WMP, MSN, etc).

      Yes, I know the situation isn't exactly analagous, but it still seems rather hypocritical to me.

    9. Re:It's all there! by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Goes on bloat. And stollen patents. And spyware. And EULA, which is now about 258 pages long. Oh yes, don't forget that awesome default wallpaper. Isn't XP the prettiest?

      But seriously, this is another move in the right direction, especially considering the current environment produced by latest worm rounds. More opportunity people get to find about alternatives to MS - the better. I have no doubt that there is more and more demand after each virus breakout.

    10. Re:It's all there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, Microsoft was bundling it's own software with Windows (and, in the past, forcing OEM's to keep it that way) in order to gain an edge on the competition. Linux distrubutions, however, bundle software from a huge variety of sources.

    11. Re:It's all there! by slackergod · · Score: 1

      And if you need proof of the suckage,
      try lftp.

      a bash-style command line with history,
      and much more. THIS is a real cli ftp client.

    12. Re:It's all there! by Laconian · · Score: 1

      You're kidding me. That's "interesting"? More like "Score: -1, Stereotype".

    13. Re:It's all there! by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Does EVERYONE remember this wrong, or is it just me?

      Microsoft did NOT get in trouble for simply bundling software. The specific issue was IE vs NETSCAPE. Netscape was at an unfair disadvantage not simply because IE came with Windows, but because it was INSEPARABLE from Windows. Parts of IE buried in the OS code meant that you were loading most of IE every time you booted, and then to use Netscape you were using up tons of memory on top of that. This made Netscape far less convenient to use, even if you preferred its interface (which I did at the time). With earlier versions of Windows/IE you could totally uninstall IE, or simply be careful never to run it and just use Netscape for everything. It worked FINE. Too fine for Microsoft's tastes, so they tinkered with Windows until they finally fouled Netscape up by convincing companies like Ziff Davis to tout loading speed as the number one criteria in selecting a browser.

      In my book, they may have won the Browser Battle, but they will lose the OS War as a result of over bloating their software. I'm thrill that they are thumbing there nose at the Justice Department and re-integrating IE with the OS in the next release. They can blow all their own limbs off for all I care, I don't use their crap any more.

    14. Re:It's all there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also goes to fun stuff like swapfiles... temp files that never seem to get auto-deleted... stuff like that.

      But. I don't believe your install is actually that big.. My 'system' partition for windows was only 2 or 3 gb when i still had XP installed, and I don't recall it ever getting full. I did have my swapfile on a different partition, though.

    15. Re:It's all there! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Stollen patents? That would explain a lot of the bloat, I guess...

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    16. Re:It's all there! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Somewhat ironic that Linux is now being praised for bundling everything out of the box--exactly what got MS in trouble (IE, WMP, MSN, etc).
      Except that RedHat bundles KDE along with Gnome, MySQL along with Postgresql, and I'm sure a bunch more.
      Now if Microsoft bundled Netscape along with IE, AOL along with MSN, etc., you'd have a point about hypocrisy.

    17. Re:It's all there! by more · · Score: 1

      ftp.exe on certain versions of Windows leaves the computer in a rather strange state if let the server to cut the connection due to a time out. The whole kernal TCP/IP stack gets rather confused and the whole net interface is down until you kill the ftp client. After that Windows gladly continues to respond to pings etc. It may be a rather confusing situation if you are not prepared to this kind of corewars. I am almost sure that things like these get intentionally designed into the Windows to make ftp etc. standard ways of communication a bit less common in the workplace.

      --

      -- Imperial units must die --

    18. Re:It's all there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is "the table of equivalents / replacements / analogs of Windows software in Linux".

    19. Re:It's all there! by CheeseCow · · Score: 1

      Most drivers ARE included with Windows XP. However, most of them are fairly generic, and they can't support devices that didn't exist at the time.

      All but my Audigy2 sound card got sound instantly upon installing WindowsXP. And 32-bit colour too. But it depends on what the drivers support.

      I think that it uses 16-bit colour in most instances, and it advices a resolution of 800x600 upon startup. It does however fall back to 640x480x4@60 when there is no driver support available.

      I have trouble getting my monitor to do 1600x1200@85hz in Linux, but in WindowsXP all I have to do is drag a slider. I know I should generate a modeline with a modeline generator somewhere on the WWW, but that's a lot worse than grabbing a .exe and double-clicking it.

      And I am glad to get fresh drivers from the vendors website upon a new installation. It is like compiling a new kernel or doing "emerge -u nvidia-glx".

      And if you like somone else managing your computer, you can use C-net's update thingy.

    20. Re:It's all there! by danila · · Score: 1

      I don't have WinXP, I use Windows 2000. It currently takes about 1Gb. Here is a picture of the contents made using Sequoia.

      http://www.lut.fi/~medvedev/misc/winnt.jpg

      As you can see, most of it is code in system DLLs. Of course, it has been shown in the past that MS code is bloat. We can safely assume that 90-95% of the typical DLL is never used. Some useless resources, uncompressed bitmaps and crap like that. A lot of space is occupied by dll cache, a completely stupid feature made to solve a completely stupid problem. The rest of the WINNT directory is bloat as well, the problem is that it's distributed bloat and you can't easily pinpoint it and say "remove this file" (although that was done for Win95 recently very successfully). All files are bloated and all look like they serve some function. But they are bloated, oh yes, they are.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    21. Re:It's all there! by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      Windows could have drivers for future hardware if it wrote them more generally. Linux has a single driver for tulip ethernet controllers. There are hundreds of them, each with it's own driver on windows, most of which don't ship with it.

      I can understand that most people are intimidated by such a naming scheme, but if they'd just offer the generics and incorporate them into plug-and-play, it would future-proof a lot better.

      Of course, then people wouldn't need to upgrade as much.

    22. Re:It's all there! by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Try unbundling Konqueror from KDE?

  7. Isn't Linus a Nord ? by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose it's true that prophets are always recognized last in their hometowns.

    1. Re:Isn't Linus a Nord ? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I just can't wait until the Swedish Chef releases all his recipes to the public domain! Mort, mort, mort!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Isn't Linus a Nord ? by radsoft · · Score: 1

      I believe he is what is known as a 'finlandssvensk', that is to say, he may live in Finland, but his native (first) language will be Swedish. The western half of Finland, from Helsinki to Turku on the coast, is where the 'finlandssvenskar' live - street signs et al. in both languages.

      Linux was honoured some years past by the Royal Technical Institute in Stockholm - I believe he received an honorary doctorate, but I might be wrong. It was at any rate the same body that gave GATES that doctor's hat the year after. The only difference is, Linux didn't drop a few cool million when he came to town...

      And Stockholm is only a day's ferry ride from Linus's home town, so that's perhaps close enough...

      --
      radsoft.net
    3. Re:Isn't Linus a Nord ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the university of Stockholm that gave Linus an honorary doctorate.

    4. Re:Isn't Linus a Nord ? by hexxx · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the University of Helsinki (his old school) also gave him one. Torvalds has also been invited to the independence day reception of the Finnish president, which is one of the greatest honors here that the state can offer you.

      --
      IVAN Nethack is not the king anymore.
    5. Re:Isn't Linus a Nord ? by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 1
      Linux was honoured some years past by the Royal Technical Institute in Stockholm - I believe he received an honorary doctorate, but I might be wrong. It was at any rate the same body that gave GATES that doctor's hat the year after.

      Yup, Linus and Bill has honorary doctorates at KTH. So does Richard M. Stallman. Quite a crew, huh? I hope they get together once in a while and discuss important matters!

      --
      Reality or nothing.
  8. Re: I'm not. by E_elven · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You do understand, of course, that without a registrations, the forums are necessarily self-moderated; and being the site is mostly frequented by people who are used to confront territorial polar bears while spending the day at the beach, you might be deep in the pee-pee yourself, trolling there.

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  9. Title, people, title! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the first thing these guys need, like som many other sites is a descriptive title! "Welcome to nordicos.org" is *not* a good title - when are people gonna learn that?

    "Nordicos.org - Nordic open source software", or if you have to, "Welcome to Nordicos.org - Nordic open source software" is the title to have. Why? Well, not only because it makes for much better tabs, and better bookmarks, but because this is what you see in a search engine.

    And search engines also pay quite some attention to the title, especially when it comes to comparing to content and meta tags. Consistency.

    Please, ffs, do the world a favour and use informative titles! How hard can it be... sigh.

  10. Re: A Finn. by E_elven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're of course inferring the extensive governmental support for open source in, say, the US?

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  11. That settles it... by Bridog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Enough of this freaking sun and hot weather, in Seattle of all places, which is also why there's no jobs.

    I'm going abroad to soak up all those tech jobs that are being shipped overseas!

    --
    Most likely the #1 Unfunny Meta/Moderator on /.!
  12. Won't change anything by Rectum2003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Normal" people don't give a sh*t about sites like that. What they need is cd's a la AOL filled with OpenOffice.Org, Mozilla Firebird&Thunderbird, a win32 port of Xine (Now THAT would be cool), ect... That and more exposure from mainstream media. I'm sorry but this is the only way OSS will really take off.

    1. Re:Won't change anything by xmda · · Score: 1
      "Normal" people don't give a sh*t about sites like that


      Maybe not, but IT-staff at hospitals, government agencies etc may think that this feels more "official" then all other sites out there. Also, the site had a very clean and professional look, didn't look "hackerish" in some way (not that that is negative in my optinion).


      My 50 ore...

    2. Re:Won't change anything by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

      And that's what we do. At the computer section of our student organisation we make a CD that is updated four to six times per year with great software for Linux and Windows, which we sell to the students at a decent price. OK, we're students in computer and systems science, but every little helps.

    3. Re:Won't change anything by damiam · · Score: 1
      a win32 port of Xine (Now THAT would be cool)

      mplayer is working on a native win32 version (no X11 or cygwin dependencies). It's coming along nicely, except for the GUI. There are no official releases yet, but you can find binaries if you poke around the mailing list archives.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Won't change anything by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Knoppix is just that - just insert it inte a PC near you to get a Linux distro that runs directly from the CD. No hardware tweaking needed.

      Visit Knoppix webbsite for more info!

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
  13. Polar bears. Oh please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I deal with tough NYC gang members every day. That's right, I work at an elementary school. A polar bear wouldn't last 2 seconds in Harlem.

    1. Re:Polar bears. Oh please. by zenyu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I deal with tough NYC gang members every day. That's right, I work at an elementary school. A polar bear wouldn't last 2 seconds in Harlem.

      A friend of mine is teaching this fall in the Bronx through one of those industry to school programs, she was just telling me about how busy she's been this week. She has not been drawing up her lesson plans, she has been drawing up her discipline plan.

      Still I think if you have ever run across a polar bear, outside of an enclosure, you might change your opinion. They could pretty much kill you just out of curiosity. Much like an eight year old might want to see what happens when one splits a worm in two.

    2. Re:Polar bears. Oh please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I heard parents are getting worried because children have started bringing guns from school.

  14. Props to the North... by blcamp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an American who studied for a year in Sweden, I can say first-hand that the Nordic have always been at or near the cutting edge where software and technological issues are involved.

    Sweden in particular is one of the most wired nations on the planet, and has been actively involved in open-source... anyone ever heard of MySQL?

    Skal till Norden!

    - Barry

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:Props to the North... by Laconian · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've heard of it! So?

    2. Re:Props to the North... by rasjani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Main coder of MySQL (afaik) Monty lives in Finland btw.. =)

      --
      yush
    3. Re:Props to the North... by Soulmender · · Score: 1

      Big up right back at ya!

      I miss Sweden as well, the most beautiful country in the world.

    4. Re:Props to the North... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nordic Countries?

      Sweden, yes. Finland, yes. Norway, I don't really know. Denmark? Not at all. If Bill Gates would declare that Windows 1.0 was the future, all government computers would run that version.

      Our politicians suffer from an extreme case of USA-envy.

    5. Re:Props to the North... by Baki · · Score: 1

      Moderators: though the chance one of you is reading this is miniscule, and chances are bigger this posting gets moderated "off topic", please: Have you read the context?!? Is this an automatic reaction to anyone DARING to supposedly criticize one of your favourite tools? Hmm maybe one of the metamoderators will "punish" you.

      Please read the parent. He was implying that the fact that Mysql comes from Sweden, being cutting edge RDBMS technology, underlines how advanced Sweden is.

      Well, Sweden is quite advanced for IT technology, and Mysql does have its uses (in fact I use it because of a bugzilla instance, for which it is good). But really, anyone calling Mysql cutting edge RDBMS technology does not know what he is talking about. At best it is an equivalent of what others did 10 years ago (Oracle, DB2) but objectively it still falls short on that. Since it is free (and I did not want to start comparisons with other free alternatives) small and simple it does have its uses. But compared to most other RDBMS it simply is not cutting edge (to use an understatement).

    6. Re:Props to the North... by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he's ethnically a Swede.. Like Linus!
      (6% of the finnish population..)

  15. Re:Open source gone too far. by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

    Hehe Habs fans will get so mad about this one ;) Go QC !

  16. BSDs anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not a single BSD?
    Why?

    1. Re:BSDs anyone? by CaTeGoRe · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing nobody mentioned the *BSDs because they're too busy camparing the installs of WindowsXP and Mandrake... My advice for the Nordics would be to go straight for OpenBSD.. it takes a little longer to get used to and I can honestly say I still havent fully figured it out yet.. but nothing beats the satisfation of running a stable and secure NAT, DNS, FTP, HTTP, IRC Server, Mutt thru Emails and IPv6ing and BNCing my way thru anonymity. Porting most Linux apps is a snap so youre not missing much there either. With an UPTIME that lately seems to rival M$-run Power Plants (oxymoron?)

    2. Re:BSDs anyone? by Malcontent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cos it's dying? :)

      Seriously though..

      I have noticed that most people who run freebsd came from linux. For some reason or another they got pissed off at linux and switched to BSD. I don't know anybody who started with BSD.

      Maybe that's because there is not a comprehensive BSD distro like RedHat or Mandrake. One where you put in a CD and it autodetects everything, sets up your video and sound and gives you a slick desktop.

      Lets face it BSD is not for newbies.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:BSDs anyone? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, for most users, there is very little difference in stability between Linux and xxxBSD - whatever difference there is will only be noticeable in a server farm setting, and perhaps not even there.

      And then, today, most Unix apps are being written for Linux. Of course, it's quite easy to port them or run them in a Linux compatibility environment, but if 90% of the visible apps you run are for Linux to begin with, then why run anything else? This is btw a reason I don't understand the excitement about Wine - it's good for keeping one, maybe two legacy applications when moving to Unix, but if you end up spending your day in Word and Outlook under Wine it's really easier and simpler to just stay with Windows.

      What I am saying is that there is no _compelling_ reason for the vast majority of users and admins to pick a BSD rather than Linux. There may be some minor benefits, but there are some drawbacks as well.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:BSDs anyone? by Census+BSD+User · · Score: 1

      You have been registered. 1

      --
      Read here about the slashdot
    5. Re:BSDs anyone? by Census+BSD+User · · Score: 1

      You have been registered. 2

      --
      Read here about the slashdot
    6. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      i know a guy who started in FreeBSD way years before now, he's in linux now. i did it the other way around. here's why:

      compared to redhat7, neat quick startup, bsd style, other linux distros have it too, i know.

      small neat system, excellent and stable for kde / x, unlike redhat, no scary process like rpcThis and nfsThat. (slackware's good too)

      not really THAT difficult, if you can manage linux, it's not going to show you anything you can't handle, wusss,

      but above all else, the _kernel_compilation_worked_. i know it probably says more about me than linux, but bsd worked first time, my hardware aint new. this gave me a boner, 'cos i couldn't get it up with linux.

      if you don't at least have a bsd box, try one, if you don't like it.... you owe it to yourself, you owe it to me, and to the community at large.

      --
      (null)
    7. Re:BSDs anyone? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent illustration of what I was saying. "Neater" startup, doesn't enable rpc or nfs by default (could be seen as a drawback for shops using those features). Kernel compilation procedural differences - something that will be done by one user in a hundred? Thousand? And of those doing their own kernel compile, how many will happen to stumble on Linux kernel compilation but not BSD? How many will experience the opposite problem?

      This is the point. You bring up a few "sort-of-nice and besides, many Linux distros have them as well" kind of stuff. Again, considering that so much software is written with Linux, rather than BSD, in mind, for most it is very doubtful if it is worth it.

      I have tried FreeBSD. It was nice. It was not really worth it, though.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:BSDs anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the BSD:s are great for Linux. They attract the script kiddies for whom Linux isn't 3l33t enough.

    9. Re:BSDs anyone? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was running BSD for a short period of time way back in the later half of the 1990s. Basicly solaris was slowaris on my sparc and it was a legit option so hey. So technicaly I started with SunOS.

      Near as I can remember, the last BSD distro for the PC I tried was probally Freebsd, which has exactly what you described, nice hardware detection and somewhat slick desktop. It even detected my Linksys netcard where redhat failed (circa 2000).

      The only thing I really miss from FreeBSD is the ftp client has a nice text status bar.

      I went with linux though for a few reasons, primarly because most of the software I want works with minium tweeking, as in the people who develop the software are usually running linux. Also the fact that all the crap you need is on CDs. This choice was made when I had a 56k connection mind you, and I was spending most of my time hunting around the net for trivial crap.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    10. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      okay, there's points there. there are distros that behave more like freebsd, cool. i'm not criticizing linux, it's good stuff, FreeBSD's gained much from linux too. i have two questions for you, then a little rant, then I'm done.

      what distribution of FreeBSD did you last try?

      what _specifically_ did it do that made it not worthwhile? you don't just say that for no reason, it offended you somehow.

      these are my experiences, they don't invalidate yours:

      tech, programmer, ex-admin, i have work to do, a dog to care for, my job hasn't been outsourced to India yet. I abandon windows because it was not worth the constant pain in the ass, now here's linux. how many options and dialogues are involved in a graphical configuration of the linux kernel. you are obviously smarter than me if you could get it to work straight off. FreeBSD, one file, some lint, first time, that's not trivial to me. Nor is it an isolated experience, naturally i want FreeBSD on my desktop, linux is not worth the trouble because i don't want magic fairy dust sparkle 3D X windows.

      FreeBSD is an operating system, linux is not, it's a kernel, my os comes as one package, it's stable because it's moderated. If linux were a car (oh lord, i'm doing it) the bonnet (hood) would be made in China, and the boot (trunk) in ... Detroit say. And it's not that long ago you had to knit the seatbelts yourself.

      rpc, nfs, if you want them you turn them on. doing this is simple, you edit the rc deltas, and it's done, that's not a disadvantage, that's a little thing called security, sometimes it's considered good practice.

      boot manager? lilo, i know it, pain in the AAAss. grub? better, FreeBSD MBR, flawless, boot problems? use the boot loader command interpreter. sometimes it's the little things that count (do you relate?)

      boot partitions, partitions in the extended partition just like good old braindamaged dos, BSD: one slice, all you need, the BSD partitions sort themselves out.

      SCO doesn't own my OS.

      FreeBSD is a smaller system, it's less cluttered, this matters to me, you can know it like the back of your hand in a very short time.

      Professional, reliable documentation associated with the project, straight from the horse's mouth as it were, the handbook is great when you're starting, and later too.

      kernel securelevels, immutable flags, in a network environment this means peace of mind.

      look, i could go on, and on, and on, but suffice it to say FreeBSD is better for ME than linux, it is EASIER for ME, we're still on the same side d00d, it's just, i use unix, you don't.

      (sarcasm is my natural state).

      By the way Dr. Moren, it is considered good sport to recompile one's kernel to reduce memory footprint and increase speed, one user in a hundred or thousand? i think not. perhaps it's time for you to braoden your knowledge of unix.

      software written for linux, i don't disagree, but see the FreeBSD ports collection at http://freebsd.org/ports/. i can install any one of thes with: cd /usr/ports/blah/; make; make install;

      --
      (null)
    11. Re:BSDs anyone? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      SCO doesn't own my OS.

      ...

      it's just, i use unix, you don't.

      Haven't you realized yet that SCO owns *all* Unixes, and derivatives.

      Seriously though, I don't really mind not using Unix. After the SCO dust has settled, I don't even think I ever want to even *hear* the word Unix. The sooner "Unix" is dead, the better. Posix will live on, through Linux. BSD may be more "real" Unix than Linux, but that is hardly a compliment these days.

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    12. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      yeah, you're right, that's all true, but i just have a strong sense of attachment to unix (SCO was a joke, you know that?).

      i have the handbook for the pdp/11, one of the earlier machines unix was built on, let me see now, ... 1971.

      i love unix more than linux, and FreeBSD is a _little_bit_closer_ and it smells musty, and it's easier in many respects. why do you linux guys really want to take that away from me, really, i'm just like you :(

      by the way, do you have kernel securelevels yet? can you make critical files unchangeable without booting into single user mode?

      i think i was Brian Kernighan in a former life.

      --
      (null)
    13. Re:BSDs anyone? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      what _specifically_ did it do that made it not worthwhile? you don't just say that for no reason, it offended you somehow.

      No, no no - it didn't offend me in any way. It worked quite well, did everything it's supposed to, reasonably fast and stable.

      But it didn't do anything that was markedly _better_ than Linux either. As i started with Linux, I find my way around it better than I do a BSD system, and, as I stated, I just did not find any reason to continue with BSD over Linux. Your mileage obviously varies, of course; the reason having multiple systems to choose from is a good idea.

      For something a lot closer to FreeBSD in style, you would go with Debian. I don't use Debian, though; again, I have a distro I like and feel comfortable with, and see little reason to change just for the sake of change (I have tried out Debian but, as for FreeBSD, I did not find a reason to stick with it). I have switched distros once, from Slackware to Redhat, around rh6 or so. Having package management was a big enough step forward that it was worth it.

      Eventually, if redhat drops the ball on its development and some other distro becomes significantly better, I would change again.

      As for compiling the kernel, I just have never had any problems with it. Load the old config file, and just change the specific stuff I want to change from the previous kernel. If it's just a kernel upgrade, I do a "make oldconfig" and it will ask about those parameters (if any) that are new only.

      That "shrink the kernel" sport you mention _is_ very unusual today. The vast majority will just want the OS to quietly do its job so they can get on with _their_ job and will stick with whatever kernel they got on installation.

      By the way Dr. Moren, ...

      Whoa, easy on the titles; I'm still not used to that. :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    14. Re:BSDs anyone? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      i love unix more than linux, and FreeBSD is a _little_bit_closer_ and it smells musty, and it's easier in many respects.

      I used to love unix, too, but that was before all the SCO stuff started. The good name of Unix has been soiled for good, and it no longer represents freedom and openness for me. At least *that* part of MSFT/SCO fud campaign has worked.

      really, i'm just like you :(

      Usually FreeBSD people like to emphasize how much more 31337 than Linux people they are. Linux is after all starting to be too m41nstr34am to be k3w1. They don't realize that it's the same boat, just with a different kernel, which is not really so much better as they like to think (scalability, portability, hw compatibility...).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    15. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      > By the way Dr. Moren, ...

      you're going to have to get used to it sometime.

      perhaps the days of building your world are receeding. i always admired the ability of BSD to have a kernel tuned exactly to the hardware of the box, and the number of expected users, don't want PII support, take it out.

      in FreeBSD this seems still widely practiced, you compile it in or load the module. i'm not giving up on FreeBSD so soon. If linux is the way of the future, that'ld be hard to argue with too. There is worse.

      --
      (null)
    16. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      okay, now that's just silly. how can you let the antics of SCO, a fart of a company destroy your love of something, anything. if you really loved unix this shouldn't change that. one of the reasons i took to FreeBSD is that i learned more from it more quickly. i'm not sure exactly why, but i found it a much better learning tool than linux, this has more to do with how i feel about it than who 'owns' it. even if i never saw it again, i'd miss it, but there'll always be the memories.

      there are also some really neat things about FreeBSD that differ from linux, disk partitions, the boot loader ... maybe they're small ... i'm not going there again. maybe it is the same boat, but the oars are different? slackware's hot too.

      perhaps i just don't see it, but why are you so willing to turn your back on decades of tradition. the systems that were really technically neat yesterday are today too, at the very least they're part of where it all came from.

      > portability,
      it's intel + a few others, that's no secret.
      > hw compatibility...
      don't have new/obscure hw, i know.
      > scalability,
      i've never fully investigated this, i will.

      the caffine's wearing off now and it's time for my nap.

      --
      (null)
    17. Re:BSDs anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the BSD kernel is not written a Nord.

      Personally, I think BSD is much better. But most of the progress, particularly with regard to more "experimental" things, is being made in Linux.

      BSD is stable. Mature. Linux is still defining itself. Or, is less afraid to re-define itself. You get lots of whacky/interesting changes.

    18. Re:BSDs anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Register me, too, as number 3, for I use the Canadian product, OpenBSD. Wow, that must be half the Canadian population!

    19. Re:BSDs anyone? by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      how can you let the antics of SCO, a fart of a company destroy your love of something, anything.

      It didn't kill my love for the tradition, the way of doing things, etc. (which live on in Linux), but rather showed how necessary it is to sever the ties to ancient Unix (the ties of which BSD people seem to be so proud). It's a phoenix & ashes thing.

      but i found it a much better learning tool than linux, this has more to do with how i feel about it than who 'owns' it.

      Perhaps because it's slightly simpler than most Linux distros? I used to dig FreeBSD, and also used NetBSD (go NetBSD!) for a while, but now consider myself mostly a member of Linux community. It's a practical thing; *BSD probably wouldn't run on my current hardware, and I'm not feeling confident about it even booting up with my dual boot setup.

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    20. Re:BSDs anyone? by trustedserf · · Score: 1

      dual booting freeBSD shouldn't be difficult though exactly how you do it depends on the other os. the boot manager (as you probably know) will boot any primary partition on your drives without prior configuration, the default being the one that booted last time. the convenience of that vs. lilo is one of the _little_ things i was talking about before (especially back when lilo was all you got, and it had the 1024 cylinder thing). of course, it only boots the partition, it won't be responsible for loading a kernel, with a windows or BDS partition that's not a problem, another stage of the boot loader resides at the start of the partition to take over the boot process. i'm certain it's not rocket science to boot a freebsd partition with grub. the next (second?) stage of the boot loader should reside in the FreeBSD partition, to grub it'll be no different to windows.

      --
      (null)
  17. like this... by thegoldenear · · Score: 4, Informative

    "What they need is cd's a la AOL filled with OpenOffice.Org, Mozilla"

    We're about to distribute a collection like this, called the Windows Toolbox: http://thegoldenear.org/toolbox/windows/

  18. Well...... by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    That and more exposure from mainstream media.

    I think that we can thank SCO for all that.

    1. Re:Well...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think we needed sco for exposure linux was almost a hosehold word even before the law suites. more like sco is riding the coat tails of linux.

  19. The Windows Toolbox is similar by thegoldenear · · Score: 5, Informative

    We provide a similar site to what these people offer (tho nowhere near as polished, and only for Windows) in the form of the Windows Toolbox, distribution of predominantly Free software for Windows, and especially its list of software

  20. a secret by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    A good idea, but I'll let you in a secret: all those tech jobs being shipped overseas aren't being shipped to Stockholm.

  21. Admirable by radsoft · · Score: 1

    Nice site, admirable idea, but it remains to be seen if they'll be relevant.

    --
    radsoft.net
  22. From the site by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 5, Funny
    Mur shmeer de heer de heef de leenooks.

    Finally, a site that will pronounce "Linux" the way it was intended.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  23. WARNING OFFTOPIC by kramer2718 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So when I first read this headline, I thought it was another government country X decides to convert such and such systems to OSS.

    This seems to be more and more common. And why not? It's a hell of a lot cheaper than paying M$ liscenses (as long as you aren't stupid enought to pay SCO).

    Anyway, I started thinking, why doesn't the US do this? We have a $4.5 * 10^11 deficit; M$ liscense payments can't help that. Well, there are many reasons the US gub'ment doesn't go Open Source, but foremost is a powerful lobby. I have an in with a democratic presidential candidate (I won't say who).

    I plan on writing up something as to what's wrong with IP law, especially the DMCA. I'd also like to include a rough proposal for U.S. government adoption of OSS.

    Does anyone know of any numbers as to much the government would save by doing this? I couldn't begin to estimate how many Windows boxes the federal government runs or what the pay for the liscenses (surely not full price?). Any help would be appreciated.

    1. Re:WARNING OFFTOPIC by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      Now there is a nice one: "Be patriotic! Reduce the deficit! Avoid costly software licensing and use OSS!

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  24. Re:They're also promoting blonde hair & blue e by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The chef is swedish and he says "Bork! Bork! Bork!" not Mork. You must not read slashdot enough.

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
  25. Outsourcing and open source == EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "Be patriotic! Reduce the deficit! Avoid costly software licensing and use OSS!

    "Be unpatriotic. Increase unemployment! Avoid all-American software and use OSS!"

  26. Re:JOBS by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Business is business. Competition is good. Suck it up and deal! That's the American way, right?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  27. It's spelled "KNOPPIX" by waferhead · · Score: 1

    It has worked on every machine I have tried it on...
    Some almost 10 years old, and the latest laptops...

    It's virtually the "AOL Users" linux distro.

    It's also likely the easiest way to get Debian installed. (knx-hdinstall)

  28. Governments should all mandate OSS... Why? by waferhead · · Score: 1

    The following trolls completely miss the point:

    The main cost of software is SUPPORT.

    Linux will require support.

    The money simply would not go to Redmond, but would be spread far and wide across the US.

    As it is for the US government, offshore support would be a no no... Strictly home grown support staff would be mandatory.

    If you buy the BS that "Linux costs MORE to support" from Redmond, even better to help support the economy, right?

    (Everyone knows that's BS, but stay with me)

    I use Linux, have used NetBSD... I could not care less what gets used, but the concept of my tax money getting pissed away on MS year after year has always burned me... Especially when there are free alternatives that would work better in most cases.(Not all.yet... Buy that would likely change quickly)

    Lets not get into the file format BS...

  29. Re: A Finn. by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would you be referring to the DARPA support (some of the BSD projects have had DARPA support for instance, linux too--in case you didn't know, Rob Watson, core FreeBSD member and on Fbsd Foudation board of directors is a DARPA Principal Investigator ), NSA funding, or something else?

  30. OS apps direly needed. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    - A standard way to add drivers for : Audio, Network, Video, videocapture. Ok, so video usually works. Now the rest please.
    - A Mediaplayer that runs it all.
    - Video Capture and recording software that just blows away the freebies from Pinnacle, hauppage like winttv etc. That should be easy. /Dread

    1. Re:OS apps direly needed. by phre4k · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't tried mplayer or don't how do install codecs. Check their hp. There are lots of codecs. The only problem with mplayer is the gui which really suck.

      /Phre4k

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    2. Re:OS apps direly needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be very nice if you could point me to a media player for Windows that doesn't suck. The things I'm looking for are:

      * Being able to play incomplete or damaged files

      * Actually show the movie on the TV I have hooked up to my computer

      * Not sucking up a lot of CPU

      mplayer does all this for me and the standard Windows player doesn't.

    3. Re:OS apps direly needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a plenty standard way to add drivers. It's called make. Also, modprobe. :)

      What? You were expecting some silly graphical wizard? I don't think that's going to happen. GUI on Linux is completely detached from the kernel on a couple levels of abstraction. It is hard to do something like that when one of your goals is to be multi-platform. Last I checked, GNOME and KDE both have that goal.

      Anyway. Who said installing drivers on Linux is hard? It doesn't strike me as something "lacking a standard". Really.

      As for media... mplayer will play anything I can throw at it these days. It can even use WMP codecs.

      Video capture... I have a Hauppague board and I can assure you that there is no shortage of video capture software, because I have personally played with more packages than I can remember. Sadly, nothing gets a very good grab rate, and I think this is a kernel/driver issue. I haven't tried in awhile, though.

    4. Re:OS apps direly needed. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      I dont expect gui. I expect standard ways of installing drivers, which means a standard way of incoporating .o files in a standard dir hierarchy. Or a standard way to compile "da source" to the .o and then installing it.

      Your comment on make is partially correct, but its the same argument that says: who needs crossplatform development, we already have it, its called: a compiler.

      Expect, Nay, I deem them neccisary even, for system management purposes and thus as a replacement for win/SCO.

      Seen the SCO authentication util? Single sign on for unix/windows? Believe me, this is the system admins holy grail, I just want it from not SCO. (of course)

      But it IS what these commercial firms shine at. Managebility. And for now there are holes in Linux managebility. /Dread

    5. Re:OS apps direly needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your comment on make is partially correct, but its the same argument that says: who needs crossplatform development, we already have it, its called: a compiler.
      Interesting thought. Makefiles, like C code, are as portable and standard-complying as the author has written them. You can write C code that will compile and run on everything, conforming to ANSI, POSIX, SVID, etc. Likewise you can write a Makefile that will do the right thing. There is no guarantee that everybody will, of course.

      I don't follow the kernel that closely, but I'm pretty sure the new build system put in place in 2.6 makes it a LOT easier to write an external module Makefile that acts the exact same way the Linux kernel Makefiles themselves do. So we can expect this to get better.

      I have not had any problems anyway, so I don't know how it could get better. Does not strike me as something that really _NEEDS_ a "standard", but 2.6 gives us that standard anyway. The real benefit probably goes to driver writers, who can now write simpler Makefiles, rather than users, who will notice little difference. Drivers on Linux _IS_ a pretty transparent process. Having recently written a simple program that runs on six or seven Unices I can tell you it's a whole lot easier to make something work well and seamlessly when you can make assumptions about the OS...
      Single sign on for unix/windows?
      I don't think it's very easy, but you can configure SSH to not prompt for passwords, for example... There is also Kerberos authentication. I really don't have much experience with either of these. But support is there. Most programs that do user authentication use PAM, and with the right PAM module you should be able to do this no problem.

      I don't know of any distros that do this by default. But I know on some you can simply edit a single line in a config file to enable it.
  31. snap back to reality oh there goes gravity.... by segment · · Score: 3, Funny
    wordpad, calc and outlook express =P i dont have an office suite installed and i dont need it. im not an accountant, i dont use spreadsheets and wordpad or even write are more than i'll ever need in terms of text formatting.

    Is this the same outlook that gets targeted by dozens of viruses, that takes someones list and sends out copies of the same virus?

    >Zipfiles builtin to windows xp

    I wonder does zip have better compression then say bzip, or gzip? Last I checked I saved more space using bzip than windows zip.

    >PDF files isnt the acrobat reader plugin instamagically downloaded when you first browse to a pdf?

    Good old Adobe PDF. I love the way it jacks up my processor in Windows, I guess this could be your reason to like it too, I mean who the hell needs free ram space?

    >MP3's WMplayer

    Oh man oh man, I loooove WMplayer spyware. I like the way it decides to just check up on album information when I'm playing it. I mean its not like the server that it's connecting to is snooping my information. Checking what I'm listening to maybe even putting together a massive list for the RIAA that says "Hey look at user foo, he's listened to 10,000 albums this month.

    >Instant Messaging MSN messenger

    How did you know another one of my favorites. I love getting a zillion 'Stop this Pop-up' ads from MSN. Yay "MS: Who do you want to spam today?"

    >IRC telnet =P

    Oh boy you're the best I mean why not use telnet and let everyone using a sniffer see my information coming down the pipes. Can I have your rocket science knowledge?

    >Decent FTP Client ftp.exe IS a decent ftp client. i thought we linux freaks enjoyed working with the console?

    FTP on any OS is rather dumb nowadays considering sftp is freely available under both OS'.

    >and A News reader. Outlook express?

    See above.

    1. Re:snap back to reality oh there goes gravity.... by Moxon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> IRC telnet =P
      > Oh boy you're the best I mean why not use telnet and let everyone using a sniffer see my
      > information coming down the pipes. Can I have your rocket science knowledge?

      Ah, I think I also need some of that rocket science knowledge to understand how using telnet to connect to an IRC server would somehow be more sniffable than using a real IRC client.

      Does Windows' telnet.exe send a copy of all transmitted data to Microsoft, or do you just have a problem seeing the difference between client programs and protocols?

    2. Re:snap back to reality oh there goes gravity.... by SEE · · Score: 1

      I wonder does zip have better compression then say . . . gzip?

      Probably not, given that zip and gzip use the exact same compression algorithm. In fact, the code used for gzip and the .zip support of the shareware program WinZip are both derivatives of the same source code, which was written for the Info-Zip program, a pkzip clone.

    3. Re:snap back to reality oh there goes gravity.... by segment · · Score: 1

      uh that's why you use ssh to a machine to use an irc client dumb arse

  32. All of *BSd is now dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dead matey. Dead.

  33. Suggestions for open source software... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yesterday as I was restocking my kitchen, I thought, "hey, I want the kind of software that supermarkets use" (possibly without the RDIF tags, though whenever my cousin visits, bottles of gin mysteriously vanish, so even those might be a good idea).

    Then, why not a serious financial management package for my money (the $232 that I've managed to save since the dot-com boom, and which has not yet been converted into gin)?

    The list goes on. Even "huge" packages like SAP are basically just dumb data-entry applications with lots, lots, and lots of options. It used to be that the entry point for building something like this was huge. You needed:

    - serious hardware
    - licenses for the OS, for tools,...
    - Oracle or something similar
    - dozens of developers
    - huge management structures

    I know, I've worked in many companies that produced this kind of software.

    Now, today, almost all of these costs have been eliminated, even the huge management structures, as developers have learned how to use tools like CVS, wiki, and even simple email.

    It's now feasible (and has been for several years) to foresee a possible next step for OSS, namely to provide domestic/personal/small-business versions of software applications that until today have been considered only "big business".

    I'm thinking of stuff like accounting systems, stock-control systems, ERP systems, financial planning systems, currency management, and so on. I'm sure you can add your own favourites: content management.

    I'm not quite sure whether I want my fridge to be equipped with a "supply chain management system", but that might be the best tool for the job.

    OK, I _know_ that one day, maybe ten years from now, Siebel Systems, or SAP, or PeopleSoft will decide to donate their source code to OSS, much as Sun donated StarOffice. Maybe it's simplest to wait.

    But this seems to me to be one of the greatest gaps in today's OSS offering, and one that it should be relatively easy to fill, given modest state support.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Suggestions for open source software... by azaris · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of stuff like accounting systems, stock-control systems, ERP systems, financial planning systems, currency management, and so on.

      Compiere? It's not native and it still needs Orrible, I think, but it's getting somewhere.

  34. Compiere... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    Yes, stuff like this.

    But needs lots and lots of work. I would guess that the only way a decent OSS ERP system will come into being is if it is (a) subsidised by the state and (b) actively used by many businesses. If I had the political power I'd definitely find this a good investment of money. Damn, it's a great idea: how much would a small country like Belgium or Sweden save per year if they could find a workable alternative to SAP, for instance? The mind boggles... Perhaps one day we will see governments simply buying software companies. It could make good economic sense.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Compiere... by azaris · · Score: 1

      Damn, it's a great idea: how much would a small country like Belgium or Sweden save per year if they could find a workable alternative to SAP, for instance?

      Having been there and done that, I can attest that the major cost is not the software licensing, it's:

      a) Hardware (acquisition + maintenance)
      b) Training
      c) Support

      None of these would really disappear under an OSS solution since you'd anyway have to pay $$$ to some consultant to set it up, train your employees and handle support when things go wrong (and they will). Actually a) can be better handled by outsourcing your ERP hosting to a service provider, and I don't know any ERP hosting services that offer OSS solutions like Compiere.

      Still, it's a great idea for yet another EU boondoggle to spend some more of my money.

    2. Re:Compiere... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      a great idea for yet another EU boondoggle

      Yes indeed. I was thinking that a few thousand blockading farmers are enough to leverage France into forcing the EU to keep spending something like 50% of its budget on agricultural support.

      What would happen in several thousand IT'ers went on strike...? Hehe. We don't need to drive tractors onto the motorways, simply refuse to answer our emails for a week.

      Hang on... we'd all be sacked and replaced within 3 hours. OK, silly idea. But certainly IT staff within ministries are both relatively secure in their jobs, most probably unionised in most places, and able to hit government where it really hurts.

      Just my 2 Euro/c. I hate strikes and am an ardent believer in the free market, but since you mentioned EU boondoggles,...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  35. Re: No polar bears here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, no polar bears in Nordic countries.

    Here is a map of their distribution.

  36. OSS and small languages by WegianWarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

    Open-source programmes for small language areas have the advantage over license-based programmes that the users are allowed to adapt the source code. This means that the programmes can be translated and play an important role in the struggle by small countries to maintain their linguistic and national identities.

    And boy do we need that up here in Ultima Thule. Lets count shall we? On the surface, we have swedish, danish, norwegian, icelandic and finnish to take into account - thats five major launguages (allthought norwegians, danes and swedes can understand eachother - we just choose not to).
    However....
    In sweden, sami is an offical second language. In Norway, we have bokmal (mainstream 'wegian), nynorsk ('new norwegian', based on the dialects) and sami as official launguages. In Finland, you have both finnish and 'finlandssvenska' (finlandswedish) to cope with. The danes and icelanders are easily the best off, with just one launguge each. So that gives us a total of nine launguage-variants that the writer of software ought to cater for... in a region with just over 25 million inhabitants. Can we seriously expect the big corps to cater to this marked? Not really, and that makes OSS the best alternative in order to make sure we get software in our own language.
    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:OSS and small languages by GQuon · · Score: 1
      Let's count again:
      1. Danish
      2. Icelandic
      3. Faroese
      4. Swedish (In Sweden and Finland)
      5. Bokmal (Norwegian)
      6. Nynorsk (Norwegian)
      7. Finnish
      8. Lule Sami (In Sweden and Norway)
      9. Northern Sami (In Sweden, Norway, Finland and Russia.)
      10. Southern Sami (In Norway and Sweden)

      10 languages. Is that right?
      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    2. Re:OSS and small languages by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      And then there is the language of Greenland. Although Grennland is in North America, it is part of the Nordic Countries through it's connection with Denmark (and closeness to Iceland).

  37. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. America is losing jobs because of big corporations going out running like mad.

  38. Re:JOBS by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...just remember: when people stop buying photoshop and ms office, americans lose jobs.

    And why would people in the nordic countries even bother careing about that? It is not the responsibility of the nordic goverments to make sure you has a job - it is the responsibility of your goverment. Despite how much you may wish for it, it the world isn't here to provide the softwaregiants of the US with a ready marked for their badly translated programs.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  39. Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by LeoDV · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Nordic countries? So what are they? The three Scandinavian countries? The three Scandinavian countries and Denmark? The three Scandinavian countries and Iceland? Two Scandinavian countries and Denmark but not Iceland?

    Apparently according to their page, it's the Scandinavian countries, Denmark, Iceland and Groenland. So that's okay. But please mention it, because I'm European and I only just found out about this Nordic Council of Ministers.

    It's really irritating when people use mindlessly generic terms like that. "Other countries like Europe--" GRR!

    1. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Scandinavia is DK, SE and NO.
      Nordic is scandinavia + Fin, Ice and Groenland.

    2. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denmark isn't a scandinavian country.
      Scandinavia is the peninsula where sweden and norway are located.
      Scandinavian is a geographic term, while nordic is a cultural.

    3. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      wrong. Scandinavia is composed of Denmark, Norway and Sweden. I'm Scandinavian and know this. If you're a Scandinavian and thinks that Denmark is not in Scandinavia, then you obviously have some serious political issues. BTW the site is not only made by the Nordic Council (the official council for this region), but it's also made by a Danish webdeveloper.
      • Nordic Council says Denmark is a part of Scandinavia
      • The Danish webdevelopers obviously agree
      • I am a Scandinavian, and say this too
      If that's not enough, you can find more info with Google
    4. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      No, Scandinavia is a lingual and historical term. Basically Scandinavia consists of countries with a Viking heritage: Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland.

      "Nordic country" is a term meant to include Finland as well.

      Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, and Icelandish are Scandinavian languages - really just variations of the same language with as much as 95% of the vocabulary in common. Finnish is a very different language, related with Hungarian.

    5. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time we in Norway makes a reference to Scandinavia, we mean Norway, Denmark and Sweden. Perhaps Iceland is officially a semi-Scandinavian country because of their language, but it's not the common opinion I think

      (The Swedes often use the term Scandinavian with products that are really only Swedish :-) )

    6. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to nitpick:
      Nordic countries consists of five countries (Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland ) and three autonomous territories: (Gronland, Faroe Islands, Aland).

    7. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by redhog · · Score: 1

      The Nordic Ministrial Council, and the Nordic coopeation between the Nordic vountries have existed for quite some time, including cooperation on crime prevention, fishing, expot control and a pasport union, much like the Schenegen union within the EU.

      This raises some interresting problems and questions, as Sweden, Denmark and Finland are all members of EU/Schengen, and Norway is not, but all of them are members of the Nordic Cooperation, so norweigians are allowed to move to the other of these counttries freely and without passport, but not to the other Schenegn countries, and all citizens of a schenegn country are allowed to move to any other one of them as freely... So we have two overlapping pasport unions. Wheee...

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    8. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Pretor · · Score: 1

      You are right that Norway is not part of the European Union. But Norway is part of both the European Economic Area and the Schengen agreement, giving Norway economic and traveling rights.

      This should actually allow Norwegians the right to travel in the whole of Europe Union without the need for an passport.

      But of course a passport is almost allways the only accepted identity paper that is accepted in the whole of Europe and the whole World.

    9. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by redhog · · Score: 1

      I didn't know about their membership of Schengen (I thought you could only be a member of that if you where a member of the EU), but did know but forrgot about the EFTA (or whatever it's called today)...

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    10. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick search on google gives these two pages of relevant information:

      schengen acquis

      EU relationship with Norway.

    11. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by asilidae · · Score: 0

      The Scandinavian countries are: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. (Faroe Islands and Greenland are Danish, but im not sure thats why they'r not included) And the Nordic countries are exactly the same, just another word for scandinavia. Here in Denmark we use nordic and scandinavian as if they are equal. You can for example look at http://directory.google.com/Top/Regional/Europe/Re gions/ where you will notice the link to Nordic Countries and Scandinavia is the same.

      --
      Whats a sig? And how do i append it?
    12. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by mr_nba · · Score: 1
      Denmark is a scandinavian country, as well as Iceland, Sweeden, Norway, Finland and the Faroe Islands.

      See this link for information about the Nordic Council and its members.

    13. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by upside · · Score: 1

      My Danish and Norwegian friends tell me Finland is not Scandinavian because we speak a non-related language. So I've considered Scandinavia to be SE + NO + DK. Norden is Scandinavia plus FI + IS + Greenland and Faroe. My take on things, anyway. What it means: Norden has long had the kind of common arrangements the EEC didn't have until recently: a common labour market and freedom of movement. We have a common history (Swedish domination) :) and very similar customs, political traditions and so on. We Finns just have a weird language. Certainly it has meaning for identity. I consider myself Finnish first, Nordic second and (Western) European third.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    14. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, scandinavia is geographical term, but it is the peninsula that has been named after scandinavia, not the other way around.

      It is called the Scandinavian peninsula, because it's the large peninsula in scandinavia, but scandinavia is more than just that.

      The "nordic countries" is a political/cultural term for the old territories of Denmark and Sweden.

    15. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I consider myself Finnish first, Nordic second and (Western) European third.
      And human fourth? :-)
    16. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by yet_another_user · · Score: 1

      Denmark is part of scandinavia, you nut.

    17. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scandinavia: Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Debate about Finland...
      Nordic Countries: Denmark, Faroe Islands (and the small islands I do not know the English name of, and am to lazy to google for), Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. Greenland is debatable I guess, and I hear Estonia now see themselves as part of the Nordic countries.

    18. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Denmark was part of Scandinavia :)

    19. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by DHam · · Score: 1
      This raises some interresting problems and questions, as Sweden, Denmark and Finland are all members of EU/Schengen,

      For added fun, Denmark isn't a member of the-treatry-formerly-known-as Schengen (and I'm not sure Norway is either). I've certainly been through passport controls between Denmark and Sweden (although I wasn't stopped - because I'm white - they did stop everyone of vaguely dark complexion). On the other hand, if you fly NL to SE there are no controls (both Schengen).

    20. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by TA · · Score: 1

      The "Nordic" region: Scandinavia plus Finland, Iceland and Faroese islands. And Scandinavia is Norway,Denmark,Sweden (note that Finland is not included in Scandinavia, it is a common error to refer to Scandinavia when talking about Finland. The correct term is "the Nordic countries" in that case).

    21. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by TA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Scandinavia is just the three countries, Iceland is not part of it and Icelandish is definitely a very different language from the the three others -- it is quite similar to what the Scandinavian languages used to be a thousand years ago. The Icelanders can read the old sagas, we Danes/Norwegians/Swedes cannot (unless we learn the language).

    22. Re:Just what the hell is a Nordic country? by TA · · Score: 1

      For the N'th time: SCANDINAVIA INCLUDES NO/DK/SE ONLY!! Finland and the other Nordic countries are NOT part of Scandinavia. Please get your facts right.

  40. Your a life failure by Disevidence · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought you left slashdot? Why ruin our peace and quiet?

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    1. Re:Your a life failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because. you're a fucking little sadass.

      nothing personal, of course.

  41. It is NOT a generic term: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It is NOT a generic term. The nordic countries is a very old term and means Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland -- the Western Europe countries surrounding the Baltic Sea.

    Scandinavia is a broader term, including all the Nordic countries plus Iceland, Groenland and the Faeroe Islands... (though I'm guessing the spelling of the last ones)

    1. Re:It is NOT a generic term: by TA · · Score: 1

      You got it completely backwards. Scandinavia consists of exactly three countries: Norway, Denmark, Sweden (incidentically the same countries where the Vikings came from). "The Nordic countries" is the extended version: Scandinavia plus Finland, Iceland, Faroe.

  42. Re:JOBS by Jonner · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's the responsibility of Nordic governments to guarantee jobs to their citizens, but it's never been the job of the US government. If that's what you're looking for, maybe you should move to a worker's paradise like China, North Korea, or the USSR (this one will require travelling back in time).

  43. Re: I'm not. by spyfrog · · Score: 1

    It is strange how this "polar bear" idea have come to become some kind of truth.
    However, there isn't polar bears in any region of Norden exept of a remote island group north of Norway and on Greenland.

    Where I live we have ordinary brown bears, not white. The bears is also smaller than the North American grissly bear. Actually, they are quite harmless since they are very shy - I have never seen one live in nature.

    The most dangerous large animal in most of Norden is actually ordinary elks since they have a tendency to put themself in front of cars on freeways... not a good combination.

  44. Re: No polar bears here... by more · · Score: 4, Funny
    Some more facts about Finland:

    Finland is only partially covered by glaciers, and polar bears and penguins are uncommon in the southern part of the country. The arctic region is called Lapland, the home of lap dancing. Natives travel by wolf or husky-dragged sleds, even though one guy persistently uses reindeers. Natives are on alert from the flesh-eating reindeer that hunt the penguins nesting in the arctic coconut palmtrees. Pohjanmaa ("the Northern Land", ridiculously flat plains of Northwestern Coast in the central Finland) are under water for three months at every spring when the damns broke, killing thounsands. Local houses are built on top of poles, and all the families still alive own boats.

    Polar bears have excellent sight and sense of smell. They are also very curious and always trying to find more food. Surprisingly, there is no record of a polar bear attacking a living human in Finland in the last 35 weeks. Loud noise, firecrackers and fire are commonly used to scare polar bears away, and a mere $699 for an official ABP (anti-bear-pack) including a multitude of bear intervention measures. Polar bears can be differentiated from the gray and black bears by their subtle color differencies. The easiest to differenciate is the local polar bear variant, the finbear, from its blue striping on otherwise white fur (ed. most laps still think it is white stripes on blue, even though a Swedish scientist has genetically proven the striping, giving an indication of the stubborn nature of the Finns).

    Tornados, blizzards, snowstorms, and earthquakes are more common in the spring (up to June or even early July), glacierquakes a bit less frequent at that time, but a couple feet snowfall in a few days is not uncommon even on other times of the year. Spring blizzards typically last for a week or so, during which time it is impossible to travel anywhere. Snowfall records for a single day is 3.14 metres, but about 1.41 meter is usual.

    The English word finish is originated by James Cook meaning the end of the Finnish winter, which usually comes a bit late, but in some years well before the start of the next winter. All the Finns, including young children and hospitalized (ed. if there was a hospital in Finland) elderly, drink plenty of potato-vodka poisoned with ammonium chloride as an anti-freeze measure, surprisingly inaffecting their marvelous, most definatly world-class sled-driving skills. Helsinki, hosting the only school, shopping mall, and museum in Finland, is also the Capital city hosting the King of Finland, Urho. Only noblemen and their huskies can vote.

    The phone system is based on mobile phones, since the native people steal any copper wiring and use it for snow shoes repair and jewelry for the huskies. The national computer is running Microsoft Windows 3.11 for workgroups, making the country only of its kind in being a 100% Microsoft market.

    Please consider, that there is absolutely no sunlight during the long winters. The natives navigate using ever-light bon-fires, which are now considered to be banned by the EU due to the planned cut in CO2 pollution - possibly leaving Finland completely dark during the winters.

    --

    -- Imperial units must die --

  45. Re:JOBS by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    America Losing Jobs?

    How could that be possible?

    A quick whip around finds him here and here.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  46. Not a generic term by Earlybird · · Score: 2, Informative
    Although both Random House Webster's Dictionary and the American Heritage Dictionary both list "Nordic" as being synonymous with "Scandinavian", on this side of the Atlantic the phrase "Nordic countries" ("norden" in most Scandinavian languages) specifically denotes the Western-Europe countries surrounding the Baltic Sea, which the Nordic Council of Ministers describes as consisting "of five sovereign states and three autonomous territories: Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, along with the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Aland". Scandinavia, for the record, is Norway, Denmark and Sweden.

    If you read the Council pages, you will notice that these states and territories communicate and co-operate, often in a cultural and economic context.

  47. Re: No polar bears here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are polar bears in the Arctic Circle maybe somewhere in Alaska and Canada. Do you understand that Finland, Norway and Sweden are much warmer places due to the Gulf stream?

    Arctic Cirle != Polar bears

  48. Re: No polar bears here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just hilarious! Be careful though, most of the people here may think this has something to do with the truth ;)

    Waiting for "Insightful" moderations...

  49. Space Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What strikes me even more is the difference in size between Win95 (500MB) and XP(3,5 GB). Win95 had it all (albeit crappy): multitasking, application windows, network, support for periferals. With an OS 7 Times the size on computers 20 times as fast I'd expect the OS to talk to me, write my letters by itself, do my tax report, and keep my elderly mother busy on the phone and all of that at lightspeed. I can't see any justification for the WinXP bloat.

    But well Linux starts bloating too... By 2005 tax reports are probably a kernel module.

    1. Re:Space Question by Marlor · · Score: 1

      > What strikes me even more is the difference in size between Win95 (500MB) and XP(3,5 GB).

      Win95 was 500MB?!?

      I remember installing it on my 486, which only had a 120MB hard drive, and still having enough space left for several games and applications.

      It was closer to 70MB... maybe the bloat came with OSR2.

    2. Re:Space Question by KeithSogge · · Score: 1

      But well Linux starts bloating too... By 2005 tax reports are probably a kernel module.
      But just think how much faster you'd get your refund.
      Seems to me Linux has the advantage of you selecting what you want to include in the kernel and in the modules. The bloat you get it the bloat you asked for.

  50. Re: No polar bears here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very funny :)
    Although I think you're doing Finland a disservice since some Americans would believe it's true.

  51. Taco the considerate by upside · · Score: 1

    Found this in their forums:

    IMplement forum registration, Quick!
    Author: CmdrTaco ()
    Date: 08-31-03 08:08

    Slashdot is coming! Run for your lives!!

    Reply To This Message

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  52. Forgot a language by xiox · · Score: 1

    Faroese

    I think that makes at least 10!

  53. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, in the US you can always flip burgers for $5 an hour. Ah, the joy of capitalism.

  54. Similar Dutch initiative by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

    The Dutch government has started a similar initiative some time ago, providing governmental agencies and other interested parties with information about Open Source and Open Standards. The site: OSOSS.nl

  55. Non-proprietary alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We provide something similiar to the Windows Toolbox, except we don't charge any money for it, and we don't taint it with non-Free software. FOSS for Windows.

    1. Re:Non-proprietary alternative by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      Of-course you don't charge any money for it, you're not distributing anything physical. we're putting it onto a CD and making a cover and putting it in a box and mailing it out to people, which is what we charge to cover the cost of.
      In November we'll be giving it away on 3000 copies of a magazine, and that costs money to be able to do.
      As for tainting it with non-Free software, we're trying to provide everything people might need to use their computer with a wealth of the different media floating around, so compromises have been made so that atleast a Freeware (or very occasionally Shareware) alternative is provided. Your distribution is different in that you only have a dozen or so applications and so aren't trying to achieve the extent of coverage that we are, so you never have to even consider making such a compromise. As soon as something Free is available and worthwhile then we replace the Freeware/Shareware because we do believe strongly in the GPL (but are tempering what we provide with practicability)

    2. Re:Non-proprietary alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of-course you don't charge any money for it, you're not distributing anything physical. we're putting it onto a CD and making a cover and putting it in a box and mailing it out to people, which is what we charge to cover the cost of.

      There is nothing wrong with charging for software, but I didn't see a download link on your website. Therefore it appears people have no other option than to pay you if they want the CD-ROM. I can think of no other explanation for this other than that you are more interested in sales than distributing Free software.

      Apologies if I missed the download link - I didn't spend much time looking.

      As soon as something Free is available and worthwhile then we replace the Freeware/Shareware because we do believe strongly in the GPL (but are tempering what we provide with practicability)

      If your goal is the promotion of Free software, then encouraging the use of shareware is no better than encouraging the use of commercial proprietary software. Neither is Free, and both are immoral.

      I also do not believe there is any point in distributing Free software that only runs on a non-Free operating system. Our ultimate goal must be to enable people to switch to entirely Free systems, and means every program they use on Windows must also be available for use on Free systems after they have made the switch. Thus we only distribute software that will also run on Linux or BSD.

      Obviously, our goals are different. A classic case of idealism vs pragmatism I think.

    3. Re:Non-proprietary alternative by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with charging for software, but I didn't see a download link on your website

      All the applications' web sites are linked to from http://thegoldenear.org/toolbox/windows/software.h tml
      from where people can download the applications

      All our documentation on configuring Windows and applications is available on the CD and the web site, GPLd. same with software we've written ourselves (http://thegoldenear.org/tweak/.
      There is nothing on the CD that isn't available for free on the web

      We haven't the resources yet to offer an 800MB download (nearly 150 programs). We would like to eventually but it doesn't offer that much more than is already provided.

      We're not charging for the software, merely for the cost of the media.

      I take your points about Shareware and cross-platform applications.

      Our knowledge is gained from actually moving people away from corporate software toward Free-er alternatives, predominantly cross platform Free software, to make the eventual transition we're working towards of moving to Debian (see the fledgling GNU/Linux Toolbox on the same site at http://thegoldenear.org/toolbox/unices/).

      Every week, through our work in computer support, we help more and more people make the transition to Free software alternatives.
      So making the balance between pragmatism and idealism is one we face every day and the balance we have struck is born out of actually working with people, having to provide software they need to actually get things done. So we haven't made our choices from within a bubble

      The Windows Toolbox has been available for 4 years, throughout that time working toward a goal of only containing Free and Open Source software, but we're taking a slow evolutionary path toward that goal where-by we're careful to always provide a consistant suite of functionality; so yeah, "idealism vs pragmatism", but people have their choice: use yours or use ours or use someone elses

  56. or like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    What they need is cd's a la AOL filled with OpenOffice.Org, Mozilla

    We currently distribute a collection like this, called FOSS for Windows

  57. Not so nice :( by Bobke · · Score: 1

    It's written in ASP and it gives a mysql error if make http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?id=3054&l ang=6 into http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?id=30'54& lang=6 It won't last long :(

  58. Hey, I guess it's easier... by ninejaguar · · Score: 2, Informative

    to say Nordic rather than Scandinavian.

    Germans are also considered "Nordic", so this is probably a misnomer. Scandinavian indicates non-German Nordic peoples who speak northern/western germanic languages with the exception of the Brittish Isles.

    Yet another example of sacrificing accuracy for the sake of brevity.

    Now the Italians will want to be called Romans.

    1. Re:Hey, I guess it's easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Germans are also considered "Nordic"

      By whom...?

    2. Re:Hey, I guess it's easier... by catman · · Score: 1

      Norden != Northern Europe.

      To us who actually live here,
      Scandinavia consists of the three countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden - in alphabetical
      sequence. Include Finland and Iceland, and
      you get Norden. I believe that quite soon Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia may also be included ... Fennoskandia or Fennoscandia is used in geology and the life sciences.

      I don't know where Greenland belongs - a home rule government under Danish sovereignty and
      geographically a part of North America :-) :-)

    3. Re:Hey, I guess it's easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was part of Nazi ideology, AFAIK. Not that it should be very relevant today.

    4. Re:Hey, I guess it's easier... by ninejaguar · · Score: 1

      By the dictionary and encyclopedia. Study sections on German pre-Christian religions (Older and Younger Eddas) and languages (Teutonic), and you'll see that Germans or those who speak a Germanic language are catagorized as Nordic.

      However, Scandinavia is identified as a regional collection of states/countries that share similarities in culture (or at least recent roots of culture) that are specifically not German(in the modern sense), but still Germanic and speak a Germanic language.

      You'll also find that Germans are Nordic, but not Scandinavian. They are part of Northern Europe, speak a Germanic language(s), but are only linguistically, not regionally or culturually, associated with the peninsula of Sweden and Norway. Scandinavians speak a Germanic language, but are not German (again, in the modern sense that the English are not German, but speak a Germanic language). The Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes are more closely related culturally and geographically to each other than they are to Germany.

      At some time in the past, many of the Nordic countries may have shared similar cultures (and similar religions) as they did root languages, but the drift in similarities are now pronounced. This is why the German distinction from Scandinavia exists, though both are Nordic.

      = 9J =

    5. Re:Hey, I guess it's easier... by ninejaguar · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with Norden. But, unless there's an economic benefit I don't see the point of grouping more countries under another common name. I mean, you're already European. So, no point in wasting euros on changing map designations.

      = 9J =

  59. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ?
    The goverment responsibility is to ensure that all people play by the same rules. Everything else is left to the players.

    Of course, that only applies to free societies.

  60. Scandinavia and "The Nordic Countries" by Mawbid · · Score: 1
    People use these terms in different ways.

    To me, Scandinavia is the limp phallus-looking peninsula at the top of globe and doesn't include any islands or even Denmark. Others take a cultural, rather than geographic, view and consider "Scandinavia" to include the islands, Denmark, and maybe Finland, but I call that "The Nordic Countries".

    I should say that I'm Icelandic and perhaps comon usage here is unusual. We don't talk much about Scandinavia, it's always "Nordurlond" ("The Nordic Countries").

    BTW, what is the meaning of this crap with Slashcode mapping perfectly valid characters like eth and o with umlaut (which I typed above) to the closest ASCII characters?

    --
    Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  61. GnuWin? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

    Windows Toolkit looks interesting... I haven't completely RTFWS (the Web Site), but how does it compare with GnuWin ?

    --
    "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    1. Re:GnuWin? by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I'd never heard of GNUWin 'til you posted that comment and at the moment I haven't the time to check it out, tho will do soon

  62. Re:Open source gone too far. by abigor · · Score: 1

    Ha, now that's funny.

    For those who don't know: the Quebec Nordiques were the "other" Quebec hockey club, before they were *sob* sold.

    Sad to see you've been moderated a troll...

  63. Icelandic is NOT that close to Scandinavian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iceland is not considered a part of Scandinavia. All the Scandinavian languages (Danish, Norwegian and Swedish) are mutually understandable without any training.

    Icelandic is pretty close to medieval Norwegian (called Norse). Icelandic is about as different from modern Scandinavian as medieval Anglo-Saxon is from current English.

    I know this first-hand. I am Norwegian, and I have collegues from Denmark, Sweden and Iceland. I speak Norwegian to the Danes and Swedes, and English to the Icelanders who haven't learned Norwegian.

  64. This is dangerous by brinticus · · Score: 1

    People! Think what you're advocating here! These are the same tribes that raided open-source coastlines and raped,robbed, and pilliaged propriety villages during pre-medieval times! THEY'LL DO IT AGAIN IF WE LET THEM!!!

  65. MOD PARENT DOWN by nickos · · Score: 1

    Please mod the parent down - it is wrong and therefore not informative.

    Scandinavia is Denmark, Sweden and Norway and sometimes Iceland (the ancient lands of the Norsemen), while the Nordic countries are Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Finland.

    See here for more info.

  66. Netherlands have similar site by edooper · · Score: 1

    In the Netherlands, a similar site has been set up, supported by the government. It is the Open Source Software Lab, http://www.ossl.nl/ . It aims to lower thresholds for using open source software by finding, evaluating, reviewing and, if neccesary, translating open source software into Dutch. Also, there is a discussion forum and a wiki board for exchanging information.

    The fact that the Nordic countries have also such a site is another sign there is a real need for platforms like these, and I think it's a good sign that governments are supporting and starting these initiatives.

  67. Is that penis shaped icon for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that penis shaped icon used for the this thread for GNU or Nordic subjects?

  68. You missed the point by Jonner · · Score: 1

    Actually, the minimum wage is $5.15 per hour in the US. In a purely laissez-faire capitalist system, you could flip burgers for $0.01 per hour and your employer wouldn't be liable if it refused to pay to fix a leaky gas pipe which exploded and caused your untimely demise. The US is no more purely capitalist than Sweden is purely socialist or China is purely communist. They're all compromises.

    I never said capitalism is a great system. It seems to work better than most others, but it does allow for plenty of abuses. I wouldn't want to live in any one of a purely capitalistic, socialist, or communist state. It's not as if you can find any "pure" examples anyway. Since governments are inevitably corrupt, I believe that government should be kept to a minimum.

    "Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite."
    -John Kenneth Galbraith

  69. Huh, Swedish domination? by zonix · · Score: 1
    We have a common history (Swedish domination) :) and very similar customs, political traditions and so on. [my emphasis]

    Last time I checked the Danes dominated the Viking era. Cutting 'n' pasting from the execelent resource that is state.gov:

    During the Viking period (9th-11th centuries), Denmark was a great power based on the Jutland Peninsula, the Island of Zealand, and the southern part of what is now Sweden. In the early 11th century, King Canute united Denmark and England for almost 30 years.

    Danish Queen Margrethe I succeeded in uniting Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland under the Danish crown. Sweden and Finland left the union in 1520; however, Norway remained until 1814. Iceland, in a "personal union" under the king of Denmark after 1918, became independent in 1944. [...]

    Denmark's provinces in today's southwestern Sweden were lost in 1658, and Norway was transferred from the Danish to the Swedish crown in 1814, following the defeat of Napoleon, with whom Denmark was allied. [...]

    After the war with Prussia and Austria in 1864, Denmark was forced to cede Schleswig-Holstein to Prussia and adopt a policy of neutrality. Toward the end of the 19th century, Denmark inaugurated important social and labor market reforms, laying the basis for the present welfare state. [...]

    The rest is history - the world wars and such.

    Anyway, I believe the Swedes were reaching out towards the East during the Viking era, and dominated there. Norwegians went further Northwest out to sea if I remember correctly. The Danes went West (also out to sea) and South, and established the Danelaw.

    The Faroe Islands (for now) and Greenland have home-rule governments under normal Danish rule.

    Thanks for listening.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me