Slashdot Mirror


Haunted Houses Explained: Infrasound

anagama writes "For anyone who cringes whenever accosted by topics such as psychics, haunted houses, or any sort of new age drivel; for anyone who thinks James Randi is cool or has an active subscription to the Skeptical Inquirer - you're gonna love this story about infrasound. Here's a quote: "British scientists have shown in a controlled experiment that the extreme bass sound known as infrasound produces a range of bizarre effects in people including anxiety, extreme sorrow and chills -- supporting popular suggestions of a link between infrasound and strange sensations. ... Some scientists have suggested that this level of sound may be present at some allegedly haunted sites and so cause people to have odd sensations that they attribute to a ghost -- our findings support these ideas.""

103 of 558 comments (clear)

  1. Does this include? by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does infrasound include the "brown note", by chance? If so, then I think that they might be on to something. I'm always shitting myself...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  2. yeah by Tirel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this on discovery channel, they even demonstrated it with a guy who was next to a fan (22hz) and saw a "ghost". ... like 3 years ago.

    Yet, on slashdot, this is breaking news.

    1. Re:yeah by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What they have missed is that this has some serious WMD use and have been investigated by the Pentagon, the Soviets and Chinese for a while (15 years+ since the first time I heard about it) now. Thankfully none of them have figured how to use it as a weapon. It decays too fast with distance and is hard to make sufficiently directed.

      60db infrasound at around 6.9-7.1 Hz is capable of driving a human insane or even killing him within a few minutes.

      Imagine someone unleashing this on a crowd in peak hour.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:yeah by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess all those trains should have killed me by now, since I work right next to tracks. There's regularly low frequency pressure waves at huge amplitudes going through me.

      I think you seriously overestimate the potential for damage that this represents. It's mostly just annoying, not fatal. I'd think the pressure levels that are fatal are ones that cause physical damage, like the ones caused by an explosion.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, when I was about ten years old, I read a series of books called The Three Investigators. The first book in the series was about a spooky old castle, and the kids investigating it would have feelings of terror while inside the building, but not outside it. This was eventually explained that sound waves that are too low to be heard can cause this sort of thing.

      Second, back in the day, an old Borland C++ compiler had as an example of sound, a short program with a rather interesting comment at the beginning. Supposedly, the sound at the pitch emitted was at the exact resonance frequency of a chicken's skull. According to the comment, a factory producing this sound killed a bunch of chickens at a place next to the factory.

      Anyways, this isn't really news.

    4. Re:yeah by Khlatu_Barada_Nicto · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...bizarre effects in people including anxiety, extreme sorrow and chills....

      So what you're saying is, there is an HTML sound tag always playing infrasound in the background on /.?

  3. Not really news... by cspenn · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been news articles about infrasound and ELF sound experiments since the Cold War began. Both the US and Soviet scientists experimented extensivel y with infrasound as a weapon, and found that it was effective against troops, except for that one annoying minor problem - it affected both sides equally.

    http://www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/gavreaus. htm

    1. Re:Not really news... by Tirel · · Score: 4, Informative

      wrong, the US army developed directed (as opposed to omnidirectional) sonic weapons a long time ago, they're considering using it for crown control now, but it still has some problems (like, making a bloody mess of your internal organs etc)

    2. Re:Not really news... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny
      they're considering using it for crown control now

      Ah HA! That's how we got Blair to say the same drivel that Bush was spouting about Iraq's WMD...

    3. Re:Not really news... by ericisbananaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have an idea on how these weapons of mass destruction could be found in iraq.. just send all the Soldiers home and send 100 housewifes to iraq.. I am always loosing stuff and my mum / gfriend can always find them... :o)

    4. Re:Not really news... by Tunguska · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So true. There is a company here in Denmark using directed sound for both explosion suppression and experimental weaponry. My friend, who is one of the owners, claim they are able to deliver a deadly dose up to a mile away.

      /Tunguska

      --
      Only dead fish swim downstream......
    5. Re:Not really news... by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      That paticular article is mostly psudo science. At the CES a few years ago, switch mode (class G) high effeciency bass amps and subwoofers were demonstrated. One of the more impressive demo booths was a resonant cavity room (tuned port) running 1 KW RMS sine wave at 11 hz. Standing a sheet of newspaper in the port was impressive watching it shake about 6 inches back in forth suspended in the port. I suffered no ill effects from this. I even went through the port into the cavity. (Cube about 12 feet/side) The port was about 6.5 feet high by about 3 feet wide by 3 feet in length into the cavity. I can't see a couple watts described in the article breaking anything. A kilowatt at the CES didn't break anything. You could sense it about 5 booths away. Right at the port the ears hurt a little much like traveling the freeway in a sedan with a window down that causes a resonation, but other than that, no ill effects. Away from the booth way like being near a freeway and having a car go by with a window open. Subsonic resonance may be very strong in the car, but a distance from it outside is mostly not noticed at any distance.

      I've also swept large sound systems for resonances from 5 hz to 20 Khz. Some large rooms resonate in the 3-7 hz range. By the article, I should be dead running between 20-500 watts between 5-25 hz while finding & fixing the light fixtures that rattle. It is true it is hard to hear frequencies below 10 Hz and they are felt at high power, but you sure can hear a chandileer rattle clear cross the room.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:Not really news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of the Monty Python funniest joke ever sketch where the English had to translate the joke into German one word by different researchers none of them would accidentally die.

      Could someone please translate this post into English?

    7. Re:Not really news... by Chromal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, your anecdotal account is not really conclusive. 10hz is merely near-infrasound. 1hz, or far-infrasound, is apparently considered the bottom end. Also, there's a question of amplitude and duration. If there were loud infrasound in your living room for hours on end, it might begin to change your affect in a way a brief exposure mightn't. Of course, this is all conjecture.

    8. Re:Not really news... by CreationLtd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll do (smirk) the 4th (giggle) word (chuckle): the AHHHAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA...... (THUNK!)

    9. Re:Not really news... by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Frequencies in the 3-7 hz are common in auditoriums from the ventilation. Modern good condenser microphones capture this easly and it can be easly seen on a good console. Most patrons don't realy sense it. It is most often sensed when it quits by it's sudden absense.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  4. BBC has a more religious spin on the story by iapetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The BBC story on the subject also attributes religious feelings in churches to the sound produced by the infrasound generated by the largest organ pipes in many churches and cathedrals.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    1. Re:BBC has a more religious spin on the story by Rostin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which is even more of a leap than the original story, considering that (A) "religious feelings" are not confined to churches, and (B) many (most?) churches don't have pipe organs.. and quite a few don't use instruments of any kind.

    2. Re:BBC has a more religious spin on the story by iabervon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The whole "religious experience" thing is kind of interesting. There is a particular system in the brain responsible for it that can be seen with fMRI. It normally responds to a very personal set of stimuli, if anything. On the other hand, there are things that tend to trigger it, including frontal lobe epilepsy and LSD. It wouldn't be too surprising if low frequency sound did, as well.

      Of course, not all religious experiences are due to any of the automatic factors, but they could help significantly with getting a whole group of people to have religious feelings together. (There has, in fact, been a study of this using LSD, and it worked well). There's actually a lot of fascinating research on the subject, with very interesting philosophical implications.

    3. Re:BBC has a more religious spin on the story by orangesquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it interesting that we look at the correspondence between infrasound and "spooky feelings," apply Occam's razor in the way we see fit, and conclude that this is a simple cause-and-effect. We overlook the lack of any explanation for /why/ humans might even be able to process this information. Personally, I would attribute any evolved correspondence to the dangers inherent from approaching thunderstorms and stampeding elephants, but who knows? I'd like to see some MRIs done that try to look at the neural circuitry and how it's behaving.

      The ancient mystics would have used Occam's razor to conclude the simplest explanation: some ambiguous external force. In other words, in ancient culture, Occam's razor would really have meant we were invoking spirits, because we can use "spirits" as an extremely simple mystical explanation for everyday phenomena.

      In our modern skepticism, the "obvious" conclusion is, interestingly, different from the "obvious" conclusion another culture might draw.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    4. Re:BBC has a more religious spin on the story by ContraB · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What psycho builds a pipe organ that goes so low that you can't even hear the notes? Once you can't hear the note wouldn't you stop making any low notes/keys?

      How far below human hearing range are these infrasound notes anyway?

      Plenty of psychos build pipe organs whose fundamental pitch are too low to be heard.

      Pipe organ pitches are notated in terms of the length of an open flue pipe that it would take to create a pitch. An 8' long pipe plays a "C", two octaves below middle C. A 16' pipe sounds three octaves below middle C. A 32' pipe sounds four octaves below. The note E on a 32' rank is about 21 Hz. So C, Db, D, Eb are all below what you can hear.

      Many large organs come with these 32' pitches. Why? It adds an incredible dimension of power to the sound when you play the full organ. You feel the music, not just hear it. It adds to the visceral experience of hearing the music. The fact that you can't hear it actually is part of the point!

      Also, to drastically over simplify, there are two kinds of pipes. Flue and Reed. Flue pipes play like a flute-- just the vibration of the air creates the pitch. Reed pipes use the beating of a reed to produce the sound. If you ever heard a 32' reed like a Bombarde play, it definitely makes an audible sound. All the overtones of the reed slowly banging away. Then you have that fundamental 32' pitch shaking the floor. Really neat stuff, actually.

      A very small number of instruments in the world have a 64' pitch. The Washington National Cathedral has one. The Atlantic City Convention Hall has another. http://www.acchos.org/ for more info on that one.

      --Thad

      --

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Much like a newborn puppy...
  5. Aha! by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or......infrasound is how the ghosts are trying to communicate with us! All we have to do is record it and then speed up the tape! Maybe play it backwards too? You'd probably hear "Iiiii...am the ghost of Caldera.....bring me $699 or I shall not find eternal peeeaaaaace....."

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Aha! by smclean · · Score: 3, Funny
      'Well, it was about that time that I realized it wasn't a dying *NIX company trying to artificially inflate their stock prices at all, but rather it was that thirty foot tall dinosaur from the paleolithic era! The loch ness monster! I said, "Go away, monster! I ain't given you no damn tree fiddy! Stop bothering my family!"'

      Wife: 'I gave him a dollar!'

      'She gave him a dollar!'

      Wife: 'I thought if I gave him a dollar he would go away.'

      'Well of course he ain't gunna go away if you give him a dollar! You give him a dollar he's gunna assume you got more!'

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  6. ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bah, infrasound ? low bass rumble ? thats just the ghost farting......

  7. The Three Investigators... by rgottsch · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...had this in 1964. See The Three Investigators #1: The Secret Of Terror Castle (by Robert Arthur 1964).

    --
    ----- On the requirements it said: Windows 98 or better - so I installed Linux
  8. Long known/speculated by ckimyt · · Score: 5, Informative


    I remember reading The Mystery of the Green Ghost (Robert Arthur, part of the Three Investigators Series) back in 4th grade (1980ish). It's originally published back in 1965, and one of the "techniques" used by the perpetrators to scare people off was using extremely low notes on a pipe organ, too low for them to hear as sound.

    --

    Putting the sig back into +1, Insightful since 1995!
  9. Yeah, right... by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Infrasound is also produced by storms, seasonal winds and weather patterns and some types of earthquakes. Animals such as elephants also use infrasound to communicate over long distances or as weapons to repel foes."

    So now we just have to explain how the elephants got into the haunted houses. Or how it is we don't see ghosts every time there's a thundershower.

    Seriously, trying to come up with a physical explaination of ghost stories that doesn't include the mind of the person is dumb. The range of reported phenomina is so wide as to be clearly "made up".

    1. Re:Yeah, right... by chainsaw1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You already forgot there are over 100,000 elephants in a thundershower?

      --
      - Sig
  10. Even Lower sub-sonics by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 5, Funny

    (sigh) Oh Great - Just when I thought I had my Home Theater set up correctly, they invent Even Deeper Bass.

    I guess I'll need to upgrade if I ever want to truly enjoy such movies as this Scary Movie

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  11. The Three Investigators knew this.... by psykocrime · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Does anybody remember those "The Three Investigators" books? In one of those, the Investigators were investigating some "haunted house" or something and, in the story, they talked about how a pipe organ playing a very low frequency tone was causing the fearful sensations that everybody was getting.

    Of course, being /. I didn't RTFA... so, is this research claiming to have discovered something new and previously unknown, or are they saying they've simply confirmed something which has been suspected for some time?

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    1. Re:The Three Investigators knew this.... by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damn! You beat me to this. Reading the article, it isnt obvious to me as to what exactly is "new" about this research. Perhaps the "facts" quoted by Mr. Hitchcock in the "Three Investigator" books werent really facts after all, but speculations / common knowledge among film industry technicians, and this is really the first time someone has conducted a scientific study on this matter. I remember reading these books in the 1980 - 84 range, and at that time, the books were a few years old already, so this is quite old knowledge / speculation.

      --

      There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    2. Re:The Three Investigators knew this.... by broothal · · Score: 2

      This was my first thought exactly. Even though it's been almost 30 years since I read that book, I can still remember it. AFAIK it was in the book The Mystery Of The Whispering Mummy from 1965.

      Man... now I'm all nostalgic and stuff. Must...read...book...again..

  12. That explains everything? by onion2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Scientists find 1 explanation for 1 spooky phenomena, and all paranormal happenings are written off as rubbish?

    Whatever..

    1. Re:That explains everything? by jarda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Furthemore, it strikes me, that just 22% of the people involved felt the differnce according to the article. This is not that much, meaning that majority of people don't seem to react to infrasound at all.

      --
      "Two beers or not two beers. That's the question." -- Shakesbeer
    2. Re:That explains everything? by aborchers · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Furthemore, it strikes me, that just 22% of the people involved felt the differnce according to the article. This is not that much, meaning that majority of people don't seem to react to infrasound at all.


      And how does that stack against the percentage experiencing paranormal phenomena?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:That explains everything? by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Furthermore -- scientists find a possible explanation for a widely reported mysterious phenomenon, and the people who reported it are dismissed as crackpots while the "skeptics" who ridiculed them come off as geniuses?

      Again, whatever...

    4. Re:That explains everything? by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the people who reported it are dismissed as crackpots while the "skeptics" who ridiculed them come off as geniuses?

      Exactly! Like that one inventor back in the 1400's who invented that one clock with a piece of glass with a starmap in it that can only be seen at one place at one time ever. He even invented computers and paper-eating solutions that activate when someone opens a briefcase and everything... Oh wait, that was in Alias. Nevermind...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    5. Re:That explains everything? by wing03 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And they would've gotten away for it if it wasn't for you meddling slashdotters.

  13. This explains Haunted Houses! by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or, of course it could be ghosts USING infrasound to make people feel fear, revulsion, etc.

    Clever ghosts.

    --
    -Styopa
  14. Interesting by Tyreth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably could go a long way to explaining a lot of these phenomena - emotions are a powerful force that lead people to all sorts of irrational conclusions.

    However, there are some reports I have heard that may not be encompassed in this, unless the feelings infrasound induces also result in visions. I have heard stories of objects moving, seeing ghosts and such, and other less intangible occurances.

    Of course, I've never personally witnessed any of these, so I have little to go on :) I am very skeptical of most of these things. I do remember reading once that reports of UFO sightings and haunted house occurances went in cycles throughout a year, and at the times when there was an increase of UFO sightings there would also be an increase in haunted house reports. Sounds like the same source to me (and I am *not* suggesting that aliens are causing it, or ghosts, but rather something less supernatural).

    1. Re:Interesting by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

      emotions are a powerful force that lead people to all sorts of irrational conclusions.

      Thank you, Mr. Spock.

    2. Re:Interesting by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard infrasound can cause hallucinations, but the article doesn't mention that...

      Randi published a short story (second section on the page) about a scientist and his haunted lab experience involving infra-sound, but it's merely an anecdote, unlike the study.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  15. Re:Can it be reproduced by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Funny

    That was exactly what I was thinking.

    Lord and his colleagues, who produced infrasound with a seven meter (yard) pipe

    Sounds like something do-able. Just don't go trying to making an MP3 of it.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  16. Heinlein used this in his book Sixth Column by Phoenix-kun · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was a most effective tool in keeping the invaders away from places where they were not welcome.

    --
    Phoenix
  17. Re:Can it be reproduced by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hey, can infrasound be reproduced in the lab. I would love to use this for my next annual Halloween party.
    Are you planning on holding your halloween party in the lab?... Oh wait, this is /. ... I think I know the answer to that one.
  18. Cellphone signals cause road rage by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can't remember where I heard this study ... but there was someone recently saying that the proliferation of cell, bluetooth, CB, radio, and wifi signals could be having a minute effect on the brain - causing us to become more impatient because it keeps our brains more active (having to filter the "over abundance" of signals.

    That said, I think it be contradictory to this study because it seems like to me that ghost sightings and the paranormal are not as common as they were in the 80's - to me things like this are only a fad - after movies/books like Poltergeist and Amityville Horror.

    Also, strange sensations like Deja Vu or Premonition I don't think can be explained through this study.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Cellphone signals cause road rage by alchemist68 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, strange sensations like Deja Vu or Premonition I don't think can be explained through this study.

      Deja Vu can be experienced by any person whose brain is properly stimulated. I worked as a Sleep Disorders Technician/EEG Technician at a hospital to finance my college education. Part of the on-the-job training was viewing videos and suggested reading by physicians and department managers. I recall seeing one video where a patient undergoing a medical study (from the 1960s) had a portion of the skull removed and the surface of the brain exposed. Doctors placed an array of electrodes on the cerebral cortex and stimulated the brain with a few microvolts of electricity. The patient, being conscious of course, said he had feelings of deja vu. On a related note, even the "tunnel experience" many people claim to see who have had near death experiences can also be stimulated without having the *real* near death experience.

      Citing a strange experience, I very reluctantly went to a reknowned psychic with a close friend who said was known for helping police solve murder crimes. Being a scientist, I rejected the session as utter hogwash, but for the life of me, I cannot explain how most of everything the psychic woman told me has come true. Even the authors of the "The Mind's I", Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett have noted scientific studies that suggest some psychic phenomena cannot be explained by statistical chance alone. Perhaps these psychics are somehow able to extrapolate what clients might do in the future based on some electromagnetic signature or pattern in the brain. The reason I mention this is that part of my training as an EEG technician involved doing brain death determination studies. The test is performed using an Electroencephalographic recording instrument with the sensitivity set to the most sensitive setting. During that training, my mentor shouted in the room "nobody move", and I said "like this [waving my left arm]". My mentor then made a note in the patient log "technician waving arm" because my waving arm with an electromagnetic field was recorded in the dead patient's drain death determination EEG test. The EEG waves showing no brainwave activity from the patient, slowly swayed (very low frequency) in a manner associated with the movement of my arm. Perhaps these psychics are able to pick up on this electromagnetic field and obtain useful data from it. I know this is pure speculation without evidence, but when confronted with these phenomena, one can only guess as to a possible explaination based on current scientific principles.

    2. Re:Cellphone signals cause road rage by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Being a scientist, I rejected the session as utter hogwash, but for the life of me, I cannot explain how most of everything the psychic woman told me has come true

      Perhaps. But the truth is that you were made aware of her predictions as they were made, and therefore cannot draw any conclusions as to the validity of said predictions. A somewhat more reasonable (but hardly scientifically or statistically valid) test would be if she had taken her "reading" of you and written the predictions down on paper for you to read later, after they had come true (or didn't.) But most poeple won't pay for that: they want to know right now whether they are going to be successful, die of a blood clot, or marry the man/woman of their dreams.

      And I will bet dollars to doughnuts that if you had made a recording of the event, and played it back later, you would have found that she was substantially sharper than you thought, and reeled you in like a fish. There may be true psychics out there (unlikely though that may be) but most of them are just very, very good at social engineering. The fact that you walked away believing that she had made valid predictions about you, or even if she was ultimately proven correct, says absolutely nothing about whether some paranormal or heretofore undiscovered neurological activity was involved. Unfortunately, none of the serious research that I've been able to find on the subject (and there appears to have been some) has ever shown that these powers exist. Proponents will say, of course, that such powers simply do not work in a laboratory setting. The simple way around that would be to interview and track several thousand customers of/visitors to so-called psychics and see whether any patterns appear in the recorded statistics. Recording the actual reading would be a good idea as well, so that any verbal con-artistry can be weeded out of the numbers, but I doubt that many psychics would submit to that.

      Furthermore, I would want to see a name-brand university behind such a study, with some big name study-designers and statisticians behind it, before I would accept the results as having any validity. I would want some people running the show who have something to lose by performing bad science. There have been way too many "fringe science" studies done with the express purpose of proving the existence of paranormal phenomena (which is about as unscientific as one can get), rather than trying to find out what, if anything, is actually going on..

      Amazing how few people grasp the tremendous utility and value of the scientific method, or even what it actually is, rather than perceiving it as a fly in the ointment of their personal belief systems. Oh well. No accounting for taste.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Cellphone signals cause road rage by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a widely believed fact that quantum wavefunctions rule our lives

      No, quantum mechanics rule the universe that we live in. We rule our lives. And I might add that how widely-believed something is has absolutely nothing to do with how factual it is.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  19. Randi should be president! by tizzyD · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I mean, this guy is a man who does not take just any one's line of crap to be gospel. He listens, he thinks, he uses his brain. More importantly, he doesn't just "know" -- as the W contends -- that things are one way or the other. He's quite open to the possibility of paranormal activity, that is, if you can prove it.

    A man willing to test his own beliefs! My goodness, what more do we want?!!?!

    --
    ...tizzyd
  20. Re:Can it be reproduced by hughk · · Score: 4, Informative
    RTFA, all you need is a 7 metre pipe.

    Seriously, they don't mention what frequencies were used (can someone extrapolate from the pipe length), but getting transducers to work so low isn't easy and you would need a DC coupled amp. Bass speakers theoretically go down to 20Hz but the performance falls off.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  21. Feeling lonely today... by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Funny
    [firmly tongue in cheek] :-)

    From the article:

    "[...] It's wonderful to be able to examine the evidence," said Sarah Angliss, a composer and engineer who worked on the project.

    Hmmm. Let me get this straight:
    1. She is a woman.
    2. She is an engineer.
    3. She is a composer.
    4. She works on seriously cool projects. Like the effect of infrasound on human behaviour.


    I think I am in love... Will you marry me, Sarah? I just hope my wife is not reading this... ;-)
    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Feeling lonely today... by Chocky2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And she's even got a rather cute website :)

  22. Re:Unanswered questions by Trigun · · Score: 2, Informative

    phenomenon Audio pronunciation of phenomena ( P ) Pronunciation Key (f-nm-nn, -nn)
    n. pl. phenomena (-n)

    1. An occurrence, circumstance, or fact that is perceptible by the senses.
    2. pl. phenomenons
    1. An unusual, significant, or unaccountable fact or occurrence; a marvel.
    2. A remarkable or outstanding person; a paragon. See Synonyms at wonder.
    3. Philosophy. In the philosophy of Kant, an object as it is perceived by the senses, as opposed to a noumenon.
    4. Physics. An observable event.
    There goes one.
    Now we just have the IR cameras to worry about. I'd say that any type of sound manifesting itself through a medium (wall, floor, etc) would indeed raise the temperature of the medium, which would be detectable by an infrared camera. After all, isn't sound just motion, and isn't heat motion?

    But what do I know?

  23. Music experiment by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the first controlled experiment of infrasound, Lord and Wiseman played four contemporary pieces of live music, including some laced with infrasound, at a London concert hall and asked the audience to describe their reactions to the music.

    The audience did not know which pieces included infrasound but 22 percent reported more unusual experiences when it was present in the music.

    Their unusual experiences included feeling uneasy or sorrowful, getting chills down the spine or nervous feelings of revulsion or fear.


    Of perhaps it was their unfortunate decision to place the infrasound in the Marilyn Manson and Nine Inch Nails songs vs the Kylie Minogue and TATU songs (or is the the other way around?).

  24. James Earl Jones by Ian+0x57 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that why darth vader had such an impact ?

    1. Re:James Earl Jones by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Funny
      Is that why darth vader had such an impact ?

      Yes. It also explains the feelings of fear and dread that people experience when they hear the phrase "This...is CNN". ;-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  25. Absolute rubbish. As everyone knows ... by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the real explanation for ghosts is that it was old Mr McCavity, the janitor. He knew about the abandoned gold mine under the house and used the ghost disguse to try to scare away the house's rightful owners. And he would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling kids.

  26. Sensurround? "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress," 1966? by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Surely the use of "subsonics" to induce feelings of dread and awe was standard sixties SF fare, and was actually applied to good use in the movie "Earthquake," for which movie theatres installed special bass-enhanced sound-reproduction gear called "Sensurround." By all accounts "Sensurround" was very effective in its original form in that particular movie.

    I don't have it at hand, but IIRC in Heinlein's 1966 novel, "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress," the central computer, "Adam Selene," uses his control over HVAC systems to generate fear-incuding subsonics at a critical point in the story?

  27. Fundamentalist materialism by RobotWisdom · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I cringe when I see people pretending it's somehow scientific to call an unproved hypothesis an 'explanation' just because it fits the current materialist paradigms, and to dismiss wholesale the whole realm of new age thinking, lots of which has been experimentally validated (obviously positive thinking strengthens the immune system, obviously lots of natural remedies have a biochemical basis).

    This sort of closed-mindedness led to 'experts' being sure it was safe to turn cows into cannibals by mixing dead cow-parts into their feed, because 'obviously' no disease could possibly spread via proteins (ha!). If those experts had respected the fuzzy-headed tree-huggers who protested that cannibalism was unnatural, how many lives would have been saved?

    The same cynical BS is responsible for hundreds of thousands of birth defects as depleted uranium and other poisons are poured into the environment-- let the cynics devote their lives to caring for crippled children.

    Robert Anton Wilson calls it 'fundamentalist materialism' (in his book "The New Inquisition": Amazon) because its advocates make exactly the same logical errors they claim to attack. [more ranting]

    1. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Prove to me X exists"

      OK, how's this? :o)

      (Sorry, I agree with what you said, I just couldn't resist :o)

    2. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by technothrasher · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I cringe when I see people pretending it's somehow scientific to call an unproved hypothesis an 'explanation' just because it fits the current materialist paradigms, and to dismiss wholesale the whole realm of new age thinking

      Attempting to find parsimonious answers to various questions is not a wholesale dismissal of anything. Consider that it may be you who are close-minded, unwilling to accept the possibility that what you want to believe may not be the truth.

      This sort of closed-mindedness led to 'experts' being sure it was safe to turn cows into cannibals [..] The same cynical BS is responsible for hundreds of thousands of birth defects.

      I'm encouraged by your skepticism toward what you call "materialism". Now, all you need to do is apply the same skepticism to what you call "new age thinking" and you're on the right path! Some further thoughts:

      • The view of "Scientist" vs "New Ager" is a false dichotomy.
      • There's a whole specrum of people with all kinds of different beliefs.
      • Everyone can be wrong- scientists, new ager, and everyone in the middle.
      • Science is about objectivity, not materialism.
      • Objectivity is how we approach truth.
      • Without objectivity, there is no truth.
      • Failing of a scientist is not a failing of objectivity.
      • A failed belief is not support for an unrelated belief.
    3. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or as I have often put it, science is a religion. It attempts to explain our world and justify our actions based on that explanation. It's not pure empirical observation and recording, if it ever was (remember that most of the first true scientists in the Western world were monks)

      I think Hippocrates and Aristotle would be quite astounded to hear you calling them monks.

      Read some Popper and then get back to us. The limitations of individual studies cannot be generalized to the statement that "science is a religion." Scientific knowledge is about falsifiable statements, things that can be disproven. Religion is about non-falsifiable "knowledge" - things that cannot be proven or disproven, ever, but must be accepted or rejected on their own terms.

    4. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by digitalhermit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or as I have often put it, science is a religion.

      Oh, come one. Science is nothing like religion. The only people who claim so are those who do not understand science. Saying science is a religion is equivalent to saying dog grooming is a religion. Science is a process - a method of filtering out truths from nonsense. There is no "belief" about this process, no deep-rooted truths about the universe inherent in testing a hypothesis.

      Maybe science is too hard for you. Not hard in the sense that the rigors of science -- the mathematics, the formulas, the process of experimentation are difficult -- but maybe the cold reality of the pure, beautiful process scares you. What if that's all there is?

      Now I've had close friends die from suicides and murder and pointless accidents and late at night I've conversed with Him or Her or Them or whatever could comfort me then, but this is completely different from science.

    5. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but you're confusing scientific method with human frailty. A common problem among those that understand neither. Scientists are human beings, after all, and don't always respond perfectly to the dictates of their calling. Even so, I respectfully submit that science has done far more for the human race than any amount of paranormal, supernatural, "new age", fundamentally irrational thinking ever will.

      Contrary to popular belief, science is not in the business of proving anything. What science does do is create ever-more-refined models of how the world around us operates, and then tests those models against reality. And as those models more accurately reflect the nature of the Universe, we acquire the power to do more useful things.

      As we evolved our intellect, our species took a dark detour of some tens of thousands of years. Finally, and only within the last few hundred years, did we create the mental tools to begin to really understand the Universe around us, and to unlock power on a significant scale. The value of those tools is incalculable. Make no mistake: it wasn't religion, ghosts, fairies, poltergeists or anything of that nature that created penicillin, computers, spacecraft and the Internet. Science, and those that applied knowledge gained from scientific research to the real world, are solely responsible. Much good and much evil has come from that application of knowledge, but on the whole Mankind is better off than ever before.

      To those that would disagree with me I say: fine, go back to your caves, go back to your incurable diseases, go back to your comfortable ignorance. I will continue to enjoy my electric lights, my doctor, and my Internet. To decry scientific achievement and technological advancement on the one hand, while enjoying its fruits with the other, is hypocritical at best.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Fundamentalist materialism by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Science is nothing like religion.

      On the face of it, this is true enough - but I think what the original author meant (and at least what I infer when I hear those words) is "Science is a religion to some people."

      Science is a process - a method of filtering out truths from nonsense. There is no "belief" about this process, no deep-rooted truths about the universe inherent in testing a hypothesis.

      Yes, but there are people (such as James Randi, for example) who treat it as such. And (as such) science is a religion to those people - even if they would deny it.

      To non-scientists, science can be a religion, because they believe science can explain everything, and that anything not explained by science cannot exist. They believe, even though they do not understand. And that's what makes it a religion.

  28. Infrasound in movies by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If Infrasound can be produced by normal speakers/woofers, it could be used to add a significant chill factor in horror movies. I bet howling and those spine-chilling wooooooo wooooo sounds *shudder* classify as Infrasound? Because they certainly scare the shit out of me.

    And what's the big deal here...instead of the ghosts scaring people, it's the ghosts producing infrared sound that scares people.
    I'm still scared of my Infrasound producing ghost-overlords.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  29. Re:Can it be reproduced by JimPooley · · Score: 2, Funny

    all you need is a 7 metre pipe

    BIG FUCKING DIDGERIDOO!!!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  30. Reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    "60db infrasound at around 6.9-7.1 Hz is capable of driving a human insane or even killing him within a few minutes."

    I find this hard to believe... do you have a reference or link?

  31. Poor research produces ambiguous results by Alereon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Poor research methodologies produce ambiguous results: Film at 11

    First, the ambiguous results: 22% reported feeling odd when the infrasound was playing. Howabout when it wasn't playing? 78% also didn't notice ANYTHING. This doesn't really demonstrate anything. Can anyone reliably determine, in a double-blind study, when the infrasound is playing? That would be interesting.

    Now, the poor research methodologies: This wasn't a double-blind study. Heck, they crammed all these people TOGETHER in a concert hall. Can you IMAGINE all the "Hey, do you feel funny? I feel funny!" discussion polluting the results? If this had been a one-at-a-time, double-blind study then I suppose the results might actually be meaningfull.

    1. Re:Poor research produces ambiguous results by Paisley+Phrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The seemingly low percentage of people who noticed anything doesn't really bother me...it makes quite a lot of sense (at least to me) that people would have varying sensitivity to something like this. After all, not everyone has the same reaction to a supposedly "haunted" house.

      What would be *really* interesting would be to take the 22% who said they felt something, and then rerun the same test in two groups; use one as a control (no infrasound), and the other as a group with infrasound. That would give a pretty good idea as to effectiveness, based on people who could possibly feel it in the first place. It could also give a good idea as to the number of false positives from the first test.

    2. Re:Poor research produces ambiguous results by Alereon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "22% reported more unusual experiences when infrasound was present in the music" is an ambiguous result. Depending on the exact makeup of the results, this could ALSO mean "78% reported LESS unusual experiences when infrasound was present," which would indicate that it has a mellowing effect.

      Double-blind studies are necessary because the actions, subconscious or otherwise, of the experimenters can have an effect on the subjects, thus influencing results. I see no indications that this was a double-blind study.

      You're right, I am relying on a media report on the study results. However, I still think having all the people in a room together is going to severely pollute the results. Assuming, of course, that any statistically valid results were actually obtained.

  32. Not enough! by mantera · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I lived in a house a few years ago where at night you'd be asleep in a bedroom upstairs and hear footsteps walking around and down/up the stairs when you're sure it's no other person, your unalarmed overnight guests unanimously report being creeped out by some incident during the night, you see curtains moving and when you go to close the windows you find them firmly shut, your cat that was snoozing at the other end of the room and glancing at you ever few minutes suddenly looks freaked out and watches the the blank between you from left to right as if he's watching someone walking across the room, a vase falls and a voodoo doll pops out, you find unexplained knots in random places that apparently serve no logical function... etc etc.
    Infrasound doesn't sound like a logical explanation to me.

    1. Re:Not enough! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think there is some natural explanation

      I don't believe in the supernatural. Instead, I have decided to believe in the superdupernatural, the hypernatural, and the googlenatural.

      And as for that voodoo doll, I've been looking for that thing! I mean, you draw one pentagram on the floor, then you go to look for your voodoo doll, and then you can't find it. I hate when that happens...

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  33. experience bass... by faxe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who has ever witnessed a show by a heavy dub sound system (e.g. Jah Shaka) can tell you about the effects long and heavy bass signals can have on a person. Anything from dizzieness, nausea
    and heavy headaches comes along. No wonder people see ghosts under the influence of ultrasound

    --
    fx! kicking and screaming
  34. Re:Can it be reproduced by nathanh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Seriously, they don't mention what frequencies were used (can someone extrapolate from the pipe length), but getting transducers to work so low isn't easy and you would need a DC coupled amp. Bass speakers theoretically go down to 20Hz but the performance falls off.

    I don't know where you're coming from with this talk about a "DC coupled amp" but bass speakers go all the way down to DC (0Hz). There's certainly no practical or theoretical problems reproducing sub-20Hz signals from a bass speaker. Even your tiny 6" mid-range drivers can (and do) reproduce 1Hz signals. You just can't hear it because so little air is being moved.

    The actual problem is that the lower the frequency, the more air you need to move in order to hear it. The amount of air a driver can move is partially determined by the Vd figure (volume of air moved). This is simply Sd (surface area of cone) multiplied by Xmax (cone excursion). The 1Hz signal out of your 6" drivers is so quiet that you can't hear it, but it's there. Not enough air is being moved for your ears (which are heavily tuned to 2-4kHz) to detect.

    So the trick is to make the excursion large, the surface area large, thereby getting a large value for Vd. Of course, you now need a lot of power to move that much air around. That's why subwoofers have 18" cones with 1/2" excursions driven by 400W amplifiers. Grunt. Grunt. Grunt.

    Of course, super-low frequency generators don't bother with all this nonsense. They just use huge pistons behind a suitably long tube. Much easier to move the required amount of air.

  35. If you are keeping score... by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Scientists find 1 explanation for 1 spooky phenomena, and all paranormal happenings are written off as rubbish?


    Scientists - 1,000,001 ..... Crackpots - 0


    I can't prove something doesn't exist, but you should be able to prove something does exist.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:If you are keeping score... by QuackQuack · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Are there cases where anything vaguely paranormal has been studied and backed up with evidence?

      Yes there are. For instance the "giant squid" was long thought to be a myth, but they have been found in the past couple of years. There are studies that suggest prayer and meditation have positive effects. The Will O' the Wisp may have been swamp gas. etc.

      But the skeptics tend dismiss any evidence for paranormal activity. Blurry UFO photo? Must be a hoax because the photographer blurred the picture to cover-up the hoax. Clear UFO photo? obviously must be a hoax because it's too good. Or "We faked a UFO picture that looks just like yours, so yours must be fake as well. It doesn't matter that there are tons of pictures, videos, physical evidence (burned ground), radiation burns on victims, radar trackings, etc. The skeptics are right in saying that none of these is conclusive evidence, but collectively it should be considered noteworthy circumstantial evidence, and not automatically dismissed out of hand. What sort of evidence, short of a captured UFO, could conclusively prove some UFOs are a previously unknown phenomena? In the skeptics eyes, nothing, since just about anything could be faked, and therefore (according to them), the whole phenomena is not even worth investigating.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    2. Re:If you are keeping score... by QuackQuack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now, there may be some evidence after all that which is still remaining, and requires further investigation - but I don't believe that a large amount of vague "evidence" points towards anything simply because there's a lot of it.

      You're right, It doesn't prove anything, but when you have lots of independant reports of a certain type of phenomena, a true "open minded" skeptic should say, well maybe there's something going on here that merits some investigation, knowing you probably will encounter hoaxes and crackpots along the way. Maybe at the bottom, there will be nothing to it, or maybe once you get past the 95% frauds and misidentifications, you find that the other 5% is a real phenomenon.

      My problem is with a lot of the the so-called Skeptics (Randi being the most famous of this type) who have the view "All paranormal claims are bunk, so they are not worth investigating, we don't have to prove it, we just know they are. You have to prove it to us. And it is impossible to prove it to them because, unless you bring an actual ghost or flying disc to Randi, they won't believe your evidence if they can fake similar evidence themselves. They don't accept anything less than absolute proof.

      I just find that particular approach incredibly closed-minded and intellectually dishonest. But it seems to have quite a following here on ./

      People also have a habit of spotting patterns in events when they don't exist, by ignoring cases that don't fit (I remember a programme interviewing a few people who'd experienced sleep paralysis, and claiming that everyone had the same visions of being visited by a figure, so therefore something paranormal is going on - this was a complete lie

      Yes, there is some really horrible research and reporting on both sides of this argument. I've learned that it's a good idea to further research any reports like this that you see on TV. Sometimes you find that it's actually been adequately explained, and the producers of the TV show "forgot" to mention that. Sometimes you find that the thing in question still remains unexplained.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
  36. Heinlein's "Fifth Column"... by Insightfill · · Score: 2, Informative

    showing up in 1941 even had some occasional mentions of the use of subsonics to scare off invaders.

  37. Reminds me of the old Pandora's Box by digitaltraveller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember all those blue, brown, beige boxes that used to float around the net? When I was a kid myself and a friend teamed up to build the pandora's box we found on the net. It was a hacker tool to annoy people. Not that we needed much help though.
    IIRC it consisted of a variable capacitator, 555 timer, and a directional speaker. What you would do was tune the device until it was just the tiniest bit past the perceptible human sound range. Then you would walk around and point it at people and see how stressed you could make them. It worked pretty good. People would get irritated very easily without knowing precisely why. Those who were very susceptible would start to sweat. It clearly induced stress.
    Seems like it might be useful for haunted houses too...

  38. Taos Hum by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Their investigative methods seem a bit sketchy in this case...but anyone interested in this might also want to check out the Taos hum phenomenom. The government's alleged involvement in sound weaponry is also dramatized in a pretty decent X-Files episode.

    I'm not trying to pass off either of the above sources as remotely scientific, for the record. :)

  39. Re:Can it be reproduced by RevMike · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I actually did something similar when I was a student at RPI - circa 1991-92.

    A previous student had found a old organ that a church was throwing out. He had collected the assorted bits, repaired it, and put it in the back of the RPI playhouse. I had taken over maintenance of the organ. The job came with the right to tell others that you had the largest organ on campus.

    As a side note, a succession of VERY talented people treated the RPI playhouse as their own personal stereo system. What appeared onstage may not have been great, but we could pump fabulous sound into that room.

    One day we were running some new lines in order be able to patch the organ into our mixing board. We decided to try a test to see how hard we could drive the system. Our subwoofers were a pair of EV 20 inch speakers. Each was driven from its own Crown DC300 amplifier, located next to the speaker for minimum cable losses. The DC300s were crossed over so that both channels drove the same speaker, which has the effect of quadrupling the power output.

    I played the lowest note on the foot peddles. It was around 20 Hz. We brought the power up to max and it was pretty impressive. Then I added in the second lowest note. That set up an approx. 2.5 Hz beat frequency. The curtains were up, exposing the cinder block wall behind the stage. Due to the insistance of some architects, the house was plaster, with no sound dampening. The beat frequency corresponded exactly with the length of the space, plaster wall at back of house to the cinder block wall behind the stage. At this point the house was quite uncomfortable.

    We stopped the experiment, rigged the organ so that the two lowest notes would play continuously, then retired to the glass enclosed sound booth. We added an extra pre-amplifier to boost the signal a little more. Then we drove the systam as hard as we could. The technical director at the playhouse was in a classroom half a mile away. He later reported that he felt the vibration and said to himself, "What are those guys up to now." After running this for about 5 minutes we called the geology department. The seismograph did indeed capture our experiment from several miles away.

  40. Timeline for infrasound by jlmcgraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that using infrasound as a weapon was mentioned in Robert Heinlein's "The Sixth Column" which was first published in 1949. Any earlier examples out there?

  41. New Age? by valedaemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, since when did the subjects of ghosts and haunted houses suddenly become "new age drivel?" I grew up in a small Southern town where every family has at least two dozen ghost stories to tell with some going back two hundred years. While I realize that many "psychics" jump on the ghost bandwagon, please don't confuse their profession with the subjects they cover. Ghost stories are as similar to a new age concept as napalm is a food for deer.

  42. Re:Can it be reproduced by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the long tube is a resonance chamber.

    they are still only using a 1/2 inch to a 1 inch throw woofer.

    I messed with this back in high school. a 4 meter pipe with a 8 inch driver can rattle all the ceiling tiles out of a room easily and create a DB increase that was off the scale of the meter we had at 30hz and caused headaches in everyone in the room woth only 100 watts rms being used.

    they are simply creating a resonance chamber for much lower frequencies... no pistons or other magic.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  43. An explanation for ghosts and things that go bump? by DMadCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No thanks. While it may be that these ultra-low sounds cause a range of sensations in human emotion does that really prove that any and all paranormal activity can be simply explained away? Aside from the obvious technical problems are the practical issues involved. Do we really need to explain away all of our dreams and fantasies until they're no more than mundane neural processes and heretofore unexplained natural phenomena? Trick or treating on Halloween "Oh, don't worry kids. That house isn't really haunted. That's just an ultra-low frequency sound causing you to have a negative emotional response. Nothing at all to be frightened of..." Either that or Old Mr. McCavity has really bad gas... (SBDs, is that smell real or the result of ultra-low frequency toots?)

  44. Amazing Randi article on Low Freq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.randi.org/jr/10-29-2000.html

  45. hehe U R TEH FUNNY!!! by pr0ntab · · Score: 2, Funny

    Extra-Low Frequency.

    You know, wavelengths on the order of meters. Like a small fraction of the size of a joist, or A-frame.

    If a standing wave that could be induced on something like that matches the resonance mode of a cavity of air (attic, exterior room), you could get powerful propogation effects.

    Elves, on the other hand, are squishy.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  46. This Side of Paradise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess this means if we ever get orders to evacuate a colony on, say, Omicron Ceti III, which has been found to have been bomdarded by Berthold Rays, but the colonists don't want to leave because of the drug-like affects of the indigenous "spore plants" we can use a subsonic transmitter to bring everyone back to their senses so that thay are as unhappy as the rest of us...

  47. Re:Can it be reproduced by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    RTFA, all you need is a 7 metre pipe

    Well, I guess I'll finally have to respond to some of that spam I've been getting.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  48. Re:Can it be reproduced by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A DC coupled amp handles low frequencies very nicely. A lot of domestic amps are AC-coupled means effectively a low-cutoff frequency as the stages are capacitively coupled.

    The speaker is what interests me. You can get sub-20Hz responses but as you put it without a nice big resonant cavity, it won't go very far. I seem to remember reading that some cinemas were once equipped with low-frequency generators for special effects, but that meant one speaker per seat.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  49. Infrasound in film by bleaked · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a really well done french film, "Irreversible" by Gaspard Noe that includes infrasound during one of the more unsettling scenes. I commend Noe for using such a genious technique in this film, since it really expresses the gravity of such a significant scene.

    If you are even in the mood for a quality film, I highly recommend this film. ::Bleaked::

  50. Infrasound can make you sick - very sick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    During the late 1980s I worked in ZLB - a HF transmitting station in NZ.

    Imagine a hall big enough to park up a 737 or 2, incluind the tail, made of concrete block and hard flat surfaces - with a sprung wooden floor, 8-10 feet above concrete.

    Now put ~20 1940-60 era valve HF tramsmitters on that floor, each with a 5hp 3-phase blower keeping things cool.

    Result: lots of low frequency beat from the motors all running at slightly different speeds (they never run true, even when syncronous), unbalance fan rotors and a drum effect from the floor. Cap it off with high level white noise from the blade tips.

    It was a recipe for a sick building. People working there spent most of their off hours sleeping. It wasn't unusual for staff to come off a week long shift and sleep the entire weekend till the shift started again.

    While we knew high level infrasonics was probably the cause, there's no legal limits or recognised testing regime, so people put up with it...

  51. Re:Can it be reproduced by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need a DC coupled amplifier, otherwise the series capacitors found on one or both ends of an AC coupled amplifier tends to mess things up. You also need to couple this energy into the air.

    Some stage amps are already DC coupled, others can be modded to DC couple them. Thanks to inherent close thermal matching, DC coupled amps built as ICs really do work. Think TDA2030 and bigger cousins - basically just an op-amp with a slew rate good enough for audio. Valve amps, however, almost invariably rely on transformer coupling somewhere and therefore are AC coupled. Same goes for older tranny amps where a transformer could provide the necessary phase-splitting for driving a push-pull output stage {nb, in those days they were invariably PNP-PNP ..... Germanium was harder to make in N-type flavour, so germanium trannies were mainly PNP. Even when silicon took over from germanium, output stages typically were NPN-NPN. Complementary symmetric output stages - at least ones that work properly and don't give lots of even harmonic distortion - are a much later development} more cheaply than a circuit with one or more transistors ..... but that was a looooong time ago.

    My old employer used a modified 1kW stage amp, a signal generator and a box of tricks I built with some op-amps and resistors, to apply weirdy DC+AC / DC+rectified AC waveforms to automotive kit they were testing for operation with a noisy supply. {a vehicle alternator gives out unsmoothed rectified AC; the battery acts like a massive smoothing capacitor but sometimes the lead inductance is too much for this to happen, and what if the battery becomes disconnected after the engine has started?}

    As for the problem of getting air to move ..... you need to make sure that the air moving away from the cone as it travels forward, doesn't simply travel around to the back of the speaker. If the cone moves slowly then this is more likely. Ideally you want to place the speaker in a heavy, sealed box. An exponential horn on the front might help too - it's the most efficient pattern for coupling a pressure wave into air. You can also use a tuned port to catch reflected sound from the rear of the cone, invert its phase by 1/2 wavelength, and then when the cone pushes at the front, the tuned port also pushes so you get reinforcement rather than cancellation.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  52. Re:Science *is* a religion *to some people* by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am tired of being lectured on statistics and the weaknesses of the scientific method by people who evince no familiarity with either.

    And I'm tired of being lectured on statistics and the scientific method, and how infallible it is, by people with no familiarity with either. (Note: this is not you, but other people.)

    Science is a process. It is a method of attaching degrees of certainty to explanations of observed phenomena, of understanding our universe without bias or wishful thinking. The process has no ethical component

    All true, but completely beside the point when dealing with people who don't understand that, and treat science as a mystical explanation of everything around us. Even when scientific method says "results cannot confirm or deny such phenomenon", they ignore the "deny" part, and harp on "confirm" - science cannot confirm it, so therefore it does not exist.

    Unlike religion, science has no asserted dogma. If I so desire, I can follow every step in the chain from 2+2=4 through general relativity, and see, carefully footnoted, the areas where we think there needs to be further work, or we are not sure of our answers. (emphasis mine)

    This is precisely my point - people who treat science as a religion believe that science provides all answers, all the time. There is no fallibility, and thus science itself becomes the asserted dogma.

    Unlike religionists, the only time scientists get stuffy when someone questions their data is when that someone has made no effort to understand the process, and is speaking from a position of obvious fallacy.

    This statement ignores people who don't question the data, and have made no effort to understand the process. These are the people to whom science is a religion - they are (as you say) speaking from a position of fallacy, but use reports of a scientific nature to assert their claims. People like this do exist (there are more of them than you know.)

    So is the study valid? Can't tell from a Reuters article.

    Yes, but there are people who will believe it - based solely on the article, and won't bother to check it, let alone understand it.

    Science requires no faith...only hard work and an open mind.

    Science doesn't need to require faith, but that doesn't exclude people from having faith in science.

  53. actually by useosx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In SOVIET RUSSIA, pr0n searches for you!

    No matter where you live now, pr0n searches for you. Don't you have an email address? Maybe you've always had an intelligent server-side spam blocker so you don't understand...

  54. Re:Science *is not* a religion by Physics+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unlike religionists, the only time scientists get stuffy when someone questions their data is when that someone has made no effort to understand the process, and is speaking from a position of obvious fallacy.

    I have to take extreme exception with this. Scientists are human and as such can be extremely biased and unaccepting of new ideas in the face of mountains of scientific evidence against their beliefs. In my field, I see this all the time.

    It would be great if we could all be entirely objective and follow the scientific method to a tee all the time, but in reality, this is seldom the case... even for reputable "scientists".

    Arrogance, and a need to have our beliefs vindicated are probably the most common downfalls I see. The good scientists are those who know they don't know it all and are willing to accept when theories they've been taught or developed are evidenced to be false. It can be a huge impact on the psyche to discover that you've based your life's work on something that's entirely wrong, and there are those who just cannot accept such an admission.

    Someone earlier made a distinction between science (the method) and scientism (a belief system akin to materialism). Too many scientists treat their theories and ideas as religeon and show just as much dogmatic rigidness as any religeon.

    I could go on and on or cite numerous examples, but you should have seen plenty of this around you (if you're truely objective).

  55. Detecting Infrasound is easy and fun by Sigfried_Blip · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a bass fanatic and infrasound has sort of been a hobby of mine for the past several years. Detecting infrasound (frequencies less than 20 Hz) is easy if you have the right equipment and it can be very fascinating, educational, and fun.

    Capturing and monitoring infrasound is easy with a PC, low end sound card, and a cheap microphone. The key is having a low enough sample rate and a spectrum analysis program that is designed for monitoring long term events. I am the author of a Linux signal analysis program called baudline. It has many features that make it ideal for infrasound monitoring. For those of you who are interested in this sort of thing I would recommend checking out the image entitled -session basso on the Screenshots page, also many of Mystery Signals contain some interesting bass phenomena.

    For baudline infrasound monitoring, some good starting command line parameters would be:

    baudline -memory 50 -samplerate 8000 -decimateby 16 -overlap 50

    This will capture about 5 hours of data at a 500 samples/second rate which is good for frequencies up to 250 Hz. Increasing the -memory buffers to 230 MB, the decimation ratio to 64, and the -overlap to 100% will have a Nyquist frequency of 62.5 Hz and capture almost a weeks worth of data!

  56. Infrasound sensitivity a survival trait? by Chromal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This page at noaa.gov mentions some of the environmental sources on infrasound: earthquakes, avalanches, meteors, large ocean waves, severe weather systems, and volcanos. Negative emotional responses to those sounds could well have been a survival trait in mankind.

    This article (PDF, 8mB) provides a nice overview and discussion of atmospheric infrasound.

  57. Ghosts can jam too by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    So..... ghosts have cool stereos with awesome bass?

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  58. Obligatory /. joke by moncyb · · Score: 2, Funny

    ELF resonance??? You mean like Executable and Linkable Format? I didn't know old houses ran Linux! Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  59. Re:The Horny Frequency by eatdave13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure to put the speaker directly underneath her chair.

    --
    "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin