Slashdot Mirror


Edward Teller Passes Away At 95

Lord Prox writes "Edward Teller, one of the 20th Century's greats in physics, died Tuesday afternoon at his home in Stanford. He was 95." Newsforge.com also has one of the final interviews with Teller, who was "a principal architect of the hydrogen bomb, [and] passionate advocate of nuclear power and antimissile defense."

93 of 618 comments (clear)

  1. Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the salad days of nuclear-weapons testing, the United States detonated 331atomic, hydrogen, and thermonuclear bombs. Many of those explosions appear in Trinity and Beyond, which utilizes a lot of declassified footage, most of it in color. Standouts include the United States' South Pacific detonation of an atom bomb 90 feet below the water to study the effects on a fleet of ships. Surprise, surprise, they sink! If that wasn't enough, the navy also loaded the decks with sheep to study the effects of the blast on life forms. Surprise, surprise, they die! Glowing leg of lamb anyone? This film will alternately amuse and horrify you at the rampant irresponsibility of the Soviets and Americans in their quest for nuclear domination. The Russians have the honor of having detonated the largest nuclear bomb ever at a whopping 58 megatons. The Hiroshima bomb was barely a kiloton. Of course, after the U.S.and Russia ceased their activities, the Chinese decided to get in on the act. But that's a different story for a different documentary.

    1. Re:Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The amazing thing wasn't that some ships sank, it was that of the 100+ ships in the bay that ONLY 13 sank in TWO detonation! (the first one ABLE was above ground and sunk 5 ships, the second underwater test BAKER sunk 8). Btw the scrap ships used for the test would have qualified as the world's 8th largest navy if they had been owned by another country and the support staff occupied another 115 vessels.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A history of U.S. atomic testing can be found here:

      http://nuketesting.enviroweb.org/hew/Usa/index.htm l

      Plenty of pics and interesting stories about how many of the tests went awry.

    3. Re:Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hiroshima was in around 15 kilotons, not "barely a kiloton".

    4. Re:Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by confused+one · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually that's not true. A majority of the radioactive material is naturally occuring. I actually find it interesting just how much radioactive material exists on Earth naturally... The truth is: due to atmospheric nuclear testing, we (collectively) increased the "natural" amount of background radiation by around 30%. The current annual dosage for the average person is around 300 mRem.

    5. Re:Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by atomicarchive · · Score: 4, Informative

      The ABLE bomb was dropped off target, a tail fin on the bomb failed. That is why so few ships were sunk. Although the BAKER test did sink more ships, the water plume that was created was very radioactive and if the ships had been manned, there would have been serious radiation issues for the crew. For more information : Operation Crossroads or buy the Atomic Archive CD-ROM

  2. the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    how is Penn taking the news? He'll never be the same without Teller.

  3. Thank you Teller. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's sad to hear. Though some might strongly disagree, as a military guy myself, anyone who advances the capability for the USA to protect and defend itself is held in high regard by me.

    Thank you Mr Teller.

    1. Re:Thank you Teller. by Nept · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except Australia, they'll just get radioactive fallout and nuclear winter

      then we'll have to live on the beach

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    2. Re:Thank you Teller. by aduzik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes indeed. Well put.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    3. Re:Thank you Teller. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > That's sad to hear. Though some might strongly disagree, as a military guy myself, anyone who advances the capability for the USA to protect and defend itself is held in high regard by me.
      >
      > Thank you Mr Teller.

      <AOL>Me too</AOL>

      And one doesn't have to be a military guy to be thankful. I'm a civvie.

      Einstein was my first childhood hero; his life taught me that science could be fun. Almost immediately, my classmates taught me that there was a downside to all this fun; being into science could also make you very unpopular.

      It was a short hop from Einstein to Oppenheimer (Feynmann was still ten years beyond my comprehension; I'd just learned long division, fer chrissakes!), and from Oppie to Teller.

      Teller was my second childhood hero - and possibly the one with the greatest impact on my daily life - because his life taught me that even if the pursuit of scientific knowledge made you unpopular, it was still right to pursue it. Truth comes first. No matter who it offends.

      So thanks, Dr. Teller. You made mistakes, and you owned up to them. (And with the benefit of 20 years of history, perhaps you weren't as mistaken about Oppenheimer as you thought). But more importantly, when you hadn't made a mistake (and for anyone who's not perfectly clear on this, Yes, I Mean The H-Bomb), for sticking to your guns, doing the science, and for never letting the bastards get you down.

      Today, in adulthood, upon reading a few choice passages from Memoirs and today's obituaries, I stood in awe of a mind still active and exploring, even at 95. And I realized I'd be a very happy guy if my mind's only half as functional as that when I'm 65, never mind 95.

      So goodbye, Dr. Teller. And thanks for being an inspiration to me one more time.

    4. Re:Thank you Teller. by refactored · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Strange. Most Russians I have met say that living in Communist Russian was hell. But quite a lot better than living in the Capitalist Russia they have now.

    5. Re:Thank you Teller. by javiercero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So please let us know what contributions to the field of physics did your hero Teller brought? Have you even read any paper from Teller? And how can you hop from Oppenheimer to Teller? Do you even know what fields of physics were they involved. Jeezus, do you even know what physics is for that matter. Oh, and let us know what new information you have about Oppenheimer that the rest of the world seems to be unaware of. Did you know that Oppenheimer did 100x more to defend this country by being one of the most succesful administrators of the national labs than Teller did with his political manipulations and 0 scientific contributions. But I guess Oppenheimer had to be a dirty commie for opposing a device that had no use, and that would bring us all one step closer to total destruction.

    6. Re:Thank you Teller. by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you Mr Teller.

      Likewise over here. I just hope your long time partner Penn Jillette is able to carry on with your work.

      --
      No sig
    7. Re:Thank you Teller. by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      being into science could also make you very unpopular.

      Yes, I became a scientist despite being presented with the image of Simon Barsinister, villian of Underdog, at an early age.

      Edward Teller was an extraordinary individual, both quirky and brilliant. And he kind of looked a bit like Simon Barsinister, too.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  4. Hiroshima by scrote-ma-hote · · Score: 5, Interesting
    After visiting Hiroshima on a school trip, and seeing the awesome destruction of nuclear weapons, I have been scared witless of them. It didn't help that I was also in Tokyo when they had their nuclear "accident".

    I have no objections to a healthy debate about nuclear weapons, but you have to think that their main task is wholesale destruction.

    1. Re:Hiroshima by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "After visiting Hiroshima on a school trip, and seeing the awesome destruction of nuclear weapons, I have been scared witless of them."

      Whoah, that took me by surprise. Is Hiroshima as it was after the blast?

      Sorry to sound ignorant, at least give me credit for asking. I haven't really thought about what Hiroshima would be today.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Hiroshima by bishmasterb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For what it's worth, Mr. Teller said (at least later in life) that we should have high-altitude detonated the first bomb over Tokyo bay as a demonstration of power, where casualties would have been minimal.

    3. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is Hiroshima as it was after the blast?

      Hiroshima is gorgeous. It's not a crater and not a radioactive wasteland. Unless you recognize the name, you'd have no way to tell it apart from any other gleaming Japanese city. Some people have absorbed anti-nuclear propaganda and assume that atomic weapons will render the target area uninhabitable for centuries. That's just wrong (although the propaganda is based on Cold War era weapons, which dwarf the power of the bombs dropped on Japan)

      Note that 100% of Japanese cities were bombed flat in WWII, so all buildings are less than 50 years old (even without the bombing, earthquakes would keep destroying them). Thus they may all look similar to a naive visitor.

    4. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That'd be a "blink and you missed it" kinda thing. What if the political leaders didn't happen to be watching? What if it was hard to judge distance, and they assumed a conventional bomb had nearly missed them? A blast over water doesn't leave tangible evidence behind (unless prehaps it destroyed some warships, but the Imperial Navy was already pushing up coral)

      To make a good demonstration, you'd need to do it on lightly inhabited land so that nearby people can wander onto the blast area and gaze around in awe before reporting back to the emperor. And you'd want to telegraph a warning 24 hours ahead, to re-emphasize military superiority (proving that it wasn't some kind of natural volcano).

      Mt. Fuji would've been an ideal target. Take a scared mountain and convert it into a scared gravel pit. That would be an undeniable show of force!

    5. Re:Hiroshima by rjkimble · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Note that 100% of Japanese cities were bombed flat in WWII, so all buildings are less than 50 years old (even without the bombing, earthquakes would keep destroying them). Thus they may all look similar to a naive visitor.
      Not at all true. There were still several large cities left pretty much untouched at the end of the war. Truman in particular refused to authorize the bombing of Kyoto because of its religious, historical, and cultural significance. I might add that the Japanese military would have shown no similar sense of honor. They were insane zealots of the first magnitude. Just take a look at how they fought on the Pacific islands, especially Okinawa. If you don't believe me, ask the Koreans, Chinese, and Philippinos who experienced them firsthand.
      --

      Guns don't kill people -- people kill people.
      But the guns seem to help a bit. (apologies to Eddie Izzard)
    6. Re:Hiroshima by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hiroshima was nothing, the cities of Dresden, Kobe, Osaka, and others were destroyed in a MUCH worse fashion by the carpet firebombing of the allies. My German teacher was a little girl in Dresden during WWII and saw firsthand the horrors of those attacks. The percentage of Hiroshima affected even by the fallout was small compared to the destruction wrought on those other cities.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Hiroshima by rjkimble · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were designed to be exploded in the air, roughtly 1000 feet above the ground. They were nowhere near powerful enough to put much of a dent into Mount Fuji. Most of the damage caused at Hiroshima was done by the fires afterward. To be sure, the blast did enormous damage, but the fires that followed leveled the city. Truman and his cabinet debated the merits of various approaches and concluded that the best approach was the one they followed. I think history has shown them to have been right.

      --

      Guns don't kill people -- people kill people.
      But the guns seem to help a bit. (apologies to Eddie Izzard)
    8. Re:Hiroshima by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is false. My uncle lives in his wifes family home which is more than 150 years old. This house is on the outskirts of Nagoya, a large city.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (Nobody should mod you down for that. Real flamebait looks distinctly different)

      I might add that the Japanese military would have shown no similar sense of honor.

      Some would question whether avoiding potentially useful targets, which prolongs the fighting and endagers your own troops, is really "honor". What does it mean to value some rotting wooden buildings over human lives?

      Others might ask if commanding a single pilot to kill 100,000 helpless civilians simply to impress the USSR is honorable.

      But let's not get into that.

    10. Re:Hiroshima by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the local doctor where I lived as a kid was from Hiroshima and was there during the blast. From the story I was told she and her twin sister were bathing in a local pond. She was fortunate enough to have been under water at the time and survived. Her twin sister was half incinerated.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    11. Re:Hiroshima by skyhawker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure what you mean by your comments, but Kyoto was then and is still a very beautiful city. Many of Truman's war planners wanted to "poke a hot cinder into the eyes of" the Japanese by targeting Hiroshima, but he decided it was just too dishonorable, even for an opponent as despicable as the WWII Japanese. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were largely untouched to that point and they had significant manufacturing and logistical facilities. They weren't just filled with helpless civilians. If you think that we dropped those bombs merely to impress the Soviets, you're quite mistaken. The Japanese were still a formidable threat, and it was essential that we defeat them utterly. To allow them to regroup and rebuild without eliminating the elements that led them into the war would have been utter folly.

      Keep in mind that the Japanese of today bear little in common with those who ran the military of WWII. To understand why we dropped the bombs on them the way we did, you have to go back and study what the WWII military did to the countries around them in the '30's and '40's. I assure you that there were very few tears shed by the peoples they butchered when those bombs exploded.

      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    12. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Japanese were still a formidable threat, and it was essential that we defeat them utterly. To allow them to regroup and rebuild without eliminating the elements that led them into the war would have been utter folly.

      No they were not formidable. They had no Navy left at all. Japan has zero natural resources (iron, coal, oil), and had no stockpiles left. There is no way to "rebuild" a 20th century army from rice and wood. They could not have harmed any American serviceman unless he set foot on their island and got stabbed.

      The only thing separating them from utter defeat was a thousand heirloom swords and a million sharp pieces of bamboo.

      I assure you that there were very few tears shed by the peoples they butchered when those bombs exploded.

      I concur that humans quickly lose the ability to cry after being butchered.

    13. Re:Hiroshima by skyhawker · · Score: 2, Informative

      They still had operating submarines and they still had an operating air force, most notably the kamikazes. The U.S. sustained quite heavy casualties during the Okinawa campaign from these and other forces. And invading the main islands would have been hugely costly in American lives. And I think you need to go study the historical record a little more closely. Their defense of their homeland would have been formidable indeed, and without the atomic bombs, we would have paid a steep price to conquer them.

      There was no way that we could end the war without elminating the Japanese military completely, and that meant invasion and occupation. Just look at what happened when the winners of WWI left a vacuum in Germany. We were not about to make that mistake again.

      Besides, the Soviets were eager to join the war against Japan and had we not invaded the Japanese main islands, they would have. As it is, they took the northernmost islands (Northern Territories?) and still hold them until this day, nearly 60 years later. We turned over our control of Okinawa, the last part of Japan that we occupied, about three decades ago. With our guidance and assistance after WWII, we helped Japan transform itself into a responsible member of the world community. And the Japanese are better off because of it.

      Your last comment is not up to the standards of the rest of your commentary. I don't think you appreciate fully just how much hatred the Japanese military sowed around the western Pacific. They were a bunch of racist thugs who needed to be beaten to a pulp. I'm sorry, but that's just the way it was.

      FWIW, I have lived for two different years on a U.S. Marine Corps Air Station in Iwakuni, about 30 miles south of Hiroshima. The Japanese I met were wonderful people and I enjoyed my time there immensely. I'm glad that the history we're discussing is exactly that -- history. I admire the modern Japanese very much and I hope to travel there again. I was a jet pilot, so I have already traveled fairly extensively throughout (and above) the country. It has many wondrous sites.

      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    14. Re:Hiroshima by dabadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      It should be noted, that more people were killed by the absolutely unnecessary bombing of Dresden (done with conventional bombs)than in Hiroshima.

      As for nuclear power stations: people like to forget how much damaging are the conventional coal power plants (and they DO emit much more radioactivity) - and nuclear ones replace mostly these, not solar cell farms.

      And finally, it should be noted, that his name is Teller Ede, since he was Hungarian.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    15. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They still had operating submarines and they still had an operating air force, most notably the kamikazes. The U.S. sustained quite heavy casualties during the Okinawa campaign from these and other forces.

      The submarines were undirected, unfueled, and helpless. The kamikazes left in the "air force" were Tsurugi, a kind of wooden plane built after running out of steel. They were never known to hit a single target- they rarely had enough petrol to take off.

      The losses on Okinawa were serious, but they were from light-infantry attacks- the kind of thing that could be avoided entirely by prudently deciding against occupying enemy territory with ground troops.

      There was no way that we could end the war without elminating the Japanese military completely,

      Well that really depends on your perspective. The US could've stopped fighting and gone home at any time, and the war would've been over for them. (Various nations from Southeast Asia would've eagerly volunteered to invade Japan within a year or two).

      The only reason they couldn't stop fighting is the US public wanted a conclusive, total victory. If you accept that mental state as a given, then it's true they couldn't stop fighting.

      But going down the path of "I was powerless to do anything besides what I wanted to do" seems silly (although it is more valid when looking at a nation than for discussing individual motivation).

      Once the option of withdrawing to an anticlimatic technical victory is eliminated, then the only choice left for the US President was overwhelming force- the atomic bomb. Truman couldn't have withstood counting the families that would be sundered by pouring American troops into Japan for a whole other year of violent invasion, while knowing he'd possesed a resource that hadn't been used. Not only would US casulties be high, but the Japanese dead would quickly outnumber the populations of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

      Their defense of their homeland would have been formidable indeed, and without the atomic bombs, we would have paid a steep price to conquer them.

      My whole point is that the US had no military need to conquer them. Japan had been knocked out of the fight; it presented no threat. Occupying the islands had to be evaluted as an opportunity for future profit, not as a defense measure against an attack.

      (But it wasn't logically "evaluated" at all- as I said, the US public had long since decided that only a total victory would satisfy them. They were in no mood to think of pros and cons)

      Your last comment is not up to the standards of the rest of your commentary.

      Just being a literalist-nazi.

    16. Re:Hiroshima by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      more people were killed by the absolutely unnecessary bombing of Dresden (done with conventional bombs)than in Hiroshima.

      If you count slow death by radiation poisoning, then the Hiroshima deathcount surpassed Dresden's within 10 years.

    17. Re:Hiroshima by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Numerically, twice as many people died in 1 second at Hiroshima as did in one day at Dresden. Some people might say the amount of pain they suffered makes some difference; I don't"

      What an absurd way of using statistics. Even if accurate, your figures are useless. More people died in Dresden than in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    18. Re:Hiroshima by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It didn't help that I was also in Tokyo when they had their nuclear "accident"."

      IIRC, it was less than a cubic foot of radioactive steam that was released.

      Your knee-jerk, poorly-reasoned reaction to seeing that (immediately thinking of a multi-kiloton nuclear blast) is why neither Japan, the US, and most other countries that know how to build nuclear power plants will never be able to take advantage of the clean and efficient source of power that such reactors are.

      Just to put things into perspective, compare that cubic foot of steam to the pounds (in some casses tons) of greenhouse gasses continued reliance on fossil fuels for power production fossil such plants put out in the course of normal operation. But I guess panic-mongering over inhaled carcinogens isn't as sexy as fearing something with the word "radioactive" in it, no matter how utterly insignifigant it really is.

    19. Re:Hiroshima by matticus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incidentally, I just moved to Dresden. Unlike Japan, the Dresdners are still rebuilding from the horror of that night, and the flood last year didn't help. However, all rebuilding should be complete for the beginning of 2006 (the city's 800th anniversary). You should see the Frauenkirche, an incredible old church that was utterly destroyed in 1945, and just started rebuilding in the late 80s (with private money, nonetheless). The scaffolding just came off part of the outside, and it looks amazing. I consider myself very lucky to be able to witness the Frauenkirche's dome in its former glory, as it's been destroyed since 1945. I'm getting very excited, being an American and seeing the horror my country inflicted on this amazing city. If you ever visit East Germany, GO TO DRESDEN and check out the resolve of these amazing people to restore their city to its former greatness. It's a nice place to live, and a great place to visit.

    20. Re:Hiroshima by 11223 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A lot of Japanese historians actually agree with our decision to drop the bomb - that the military would have simply continued on inertia as long as it could, and this gave the Emperor a chance for a reasonable surrender.

      It's only here in the US that we have such guilt about it.

    21. Re:Hiroshima by Steve+B · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference between an A-Bomb and systematic firebombing is that panicked civilians can outrun fires and huddle together to starve in crowded suburban ruins.

      You don't outrun a firestorm, unless you have muscle tissue that doesn't run by oxidation.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    22. Re:Hiroshima by hellraizr · · Score: 2, Informative

      No they were not formidable. They had no Navy left at all. Japan has zero natural resources (iron, coal, oil), and had no stockpiles left. There is no way to "rebuild" a 20th century army from rice and wood.

      I believe you need a history lesson. america had to invade mainland japan to win the war, or force them to surrender. the japanese were willing to fight untill EVERY and I mean E. V. E. R. Y. damn one of them was dead. they had 6 million people in training (civ's, children, old people, EVERYONE!) to fight off the coming american invasion. hell they even had propaganda campaign's trying to get more support. there was literilly no other choice but to nuke them. it SAVED countless millions of lives. I trully dispise reading such uneducated garbage on slashdot, we're supposed to be the geeks, the ones that payed attention in school.

  5. Check out "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    By Richard Rhoads.

    It's a fantastic book about the creation of the Atomic Bomb -- from when scientists first realized the possibility, through the manhatten project. It's set against the backdrop of political events of the first half of the century and provides a fascinating account of the entire experience, including the actions of Edward Teller.

    I'd highly recommend it.

    1. Re:Check out "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by ralphb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct - I just happened to be reading Dark Sun when I heard that Teller had died. It was a weird coincidence.

      The book paints Teller as ideosyncratic and egomaniacal, but brilliant. That seems to apply to many of the atomic scientists (Oppenheimer, et al).

      The book goes into a lot of great tech detail about the H-Bomb. Building it was an enormously complex engineering problem. The first H-bomb was a cylinder with hemispherical ends that was over 20 feet long and over 6 feet in diameter, and used an A-bomb at one end to start the fusion reaction.

      Also, they could only do limited testing, so most of the predictions were purely theoretical. The book recounts one test of a Lithium-reaction H-Bomb that was expected to yield about a 6-Megaton blast that actually was over 15-Megatons. Caught the scientists off guard and caused some injuries and damage because the blast radius was so much larger than expected.

      The book was rather dry and slow in places, but overall is a pretty good read.

  6. In Memory of the man... by ChrisHanel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...since he was referred to as "Dr. Strangelove" by some, i only thought it appropriate to quote a line that Teller would have found quite appropriate...

    "Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost if you keep it a secret! Why didn't you tell the world!?"

    --

    -=-This sig brought to you by The Cheat; and by Viewers Like You.-=-

  7. A great loss by leeum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some will mourn the loss of a man who vocally advocated the a strong national defense and who made great contributions to the development of the hydrogen bomb. I'm sure as well that others will castigate the man for those very same achievements.

    However, I remember myself as a geeky kid in Malaysia interested in science and technology, writing a letter to one of the 'great names'. I was quite amazed to receive a personal reply to my letter, typewritten but signed by hand. His reply was humble (he never put down any of what must have seemed to him to be naive and silly observations), encouraging (the words "I am pleased that there are children from all over the world like you who are interested in science." aren't much to an adult, but they sure meant a lot to me as a kid!) and inspiring.

    That sums up the man in my mind, and I mourn the loss of that man.

    1. Re:A great loss by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was quite amazed to receive a personal reply to my letter, typewritten but signed by hand.

      Wow, so you actually have a Teller number of 1 ?
      If you would only be so kind as to reply to my reply, then I could boast a Teller number of 2.

  8. Hungary is EVIL I tells ya! by platform · · Score: 3, Funny

    Edward Teller: advocated the use of nuclear weapons for everything from digging holes to brushing teeth.

    Charles Simonyi: primarily responsible for the creation of Microsoft Office and Hungarian notation. *shudder*

    Coincidence or evil Hungarian conspiracy?

    1. Re:Hungary is EVIL I tells ya! by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Funny
      There is a story that at one of the meetings at Los Alamos, Feynman was absent and Fermi had to leave the room for some reason. At this point one of the remaining physicists in the room said:
      Jol van, most maygarul folytathatunk.
      (Fine, now we can continue in Hungarian.)
      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  9. Edward Teller, via IOP by photoblur · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I just received news of Edward Teller's passage today via PhysicsWeb update, a physics news summary service of the Institute of Physics. Here's what they had to say:
    Edward Teller dies (Sep 10) http://physicsweb.org/article/news/7/9/6 Edward Teller died on September 9 at his home on the campus of Stanford University in California, having had a stroke a few days earlier, according to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Teller was instrumental in the development of the hydrogen bomb, having previously worked on the Manhattan atomic-bomb project during the Second World War. A passionate advocate of nuclear weapons, he angered many physicists after he gave evidence at the 1954 trial of Robert Oppenheimer, the leader of the Manhattan project, that led to Oppenheimer losing his security clearance.
  10. Glad he was on our side by Teeja · · Score: 2, Informative
    If it weren't for Teller, the Soviets might have developed (and used) the H-bomb first. Glad he was on our side.

    Here a link to an interesting interview with Teller along with some video clips: Teller Interview

  11. obituary writer dead too by jwachter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Did anyone notice that the obituary in the New York Times was written by someone who himself is already dead?

    Walter Sullivan, a science writer and editor for The New York Times, died in 1996.

    Spooky.

    1. Re:obituary writer dead too by ChrisHanel · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, papers like the New York Times tend to stockpile Obituaries for people they know are going to kick the bucket soon. Obviously, Teller hung around a lot longer than they expected.

      IIRC, there was a website slipup where obituaries for people who weren't dead yet suddenly appeared in a code glitch. I think Ronald Reagan was one of them... pretty amusing how poignant they read.

      --

      -=-This sig brought to you by The Cheat; and by Viewers Like You.-=-

  12. fairwell by ruprechtjones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rest in peace, o ye father of the cold war. And may lessons be learned from your mistakes, your regrets, and your insights.

    --
    Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  13. Friend to the Environment by sssmashy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few years ago, he and colleagues submitted a paper to Nature that suggested dispersing sulfur dioxide or other submicron particles in the stratosphere to block sunlight and thus halt global warming.

    Easing the effects of one kind of pollutant by adding a whole bunch of other pollutants to the atmosphere. Goodbye, global warming; hello, acid rain! Between that, and the whole hydrogen bomb thing, I'm guessing he wasn't up for Greenpeace's Man of the Year award.

    1. Re:Friend to the Environment by confused+one · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You know, it wouldn't have to be sulfer dioxide. It could just as easily be corn starch...

      btw, we don't care what Greenpeace thinks... Mwahahaha

  14. It should also be said.. by cmowire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It should also be said that he unfairly denounced another scientist, Robert Oppenheimer, as a comunist. Because Oppenheimer didn't think we should go for the H-bomb.

    Not exactly a nice guy, glowing obituaries asside.

    1. Re:It should also be said.. by hoofie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Extract from Times Obituary :

      "He was later to say that, unlike Oppenheimer, he was opposed to the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, and would have preferred a demonstration of the new weapon's power to Japanese scientists. Nevertheless, in his memoirs, published in 2001, Teller admitted, while continuing to believe that Oppenheimer's opposition to the H-bomb was wrong, that the hearings had been a mistake, and that he himself had been unwise to testify."
    2. Re:It should also be said.. by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...he unfairly denounced another scientist...


      Read the Venona transcripts. Teller was right, Oppenheimer *was* a communist sympathizer at the very least.

      "...we can say for certain that Oppenheimer did in fact knowingly supply classified information on the atom bomb to the Soviet Union." While he directed the Manhattan Project, it was known that J. Robert Oppenheimer's wife, brother, and sister-in-law were all members of the Communist Party. The fact that he regularly gave a large portion of his salary to the Communist Party was also common knowledge among government officials overseeing the project. This should have made him at the least a security risk for a project with such deep ramifications for national security. It didn't. In Venona, Oppenheimer is identified with the code-name "Veskel." One message instructs agents to "re-establish contact with 'Veskel'...as soon as possible." In 1994, a year before the deciphered Venona cables were released, the man in charge of Soviet spying on America's atom bomb project revealed that Oppenheimer had supplied the Soviets with classified reports on atom bomb development."

      Teller was spot-on, and was/has been pilloried for DECADES by leftist sympathizers for his integrity.

      (quoted from http://www.academia.org/campus_reports/2000/novemb er_2000_4.html, but confirmed by reading it personally)
      --
      -Styopa
  15. Re:Yes by Lx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, like Leni Riefenstahl, also dead today. Both vigorously supported some of the most destructive and forces known to humanity. Together, they could probably take over hell.

  16. Wrong. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their main task is to never be used, to just sit there and look evil.

    That we have them to use discourages their use.

  17. Re:Missiles are necessary by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The world needs missiles.
    Nope.

    Eventually every nation, even the ones in Africa, will have nukes.
    Yep.

    "Nukes" are nuclear explosives, sometimes called "warheads". They do not need missiles to deliver them. Kamikaze terrorists are sufficient. A good ICBM shield does nothing against nukes.

    An African nation that fired an ICBM at the US would have 80 missiles targeted to melt it into a puddle before their single shot even reached the Atlantic. Any non-suicidal African dictator who wishes to nuke America will transport the bomb by SUV, not ICBM.

  18. Praise? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Edward Teller did more to bring this world to the brink of destruction than any other human that has ever lived.

    His ego drove him to push the hydrogen bomb on the world, and his ego prevented him from both admitting his mistake and from doing his best (like many of the other scientists who aided him) to make amends.

    For those of who you insist the hydrogen bomb is necessary for national security, you're both ignorant and foolish. The hydrogen bomb has basically no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

    A non-hydrogen based atomic bomb has more than enough bang to destroy our enemies. The ONLY use for a hydrogen bomb is planetary destruction.

    I, for one, will not miss Teller in the least. He represents the worst of humanity. He was willing to put his ego ahead of, quite literally, ALL else.

  19. Re:Wow he was old by Capsaicin · · Score: 4, Funny
    95 is an impressively long time for a human being to live. I would bet that all the nuclear materials Teller worked with somehow mutated him into having extraordinary longevity.

    Leni Riefenstahl died the same (previous?) day aged 101! Maybe making Nazi propaganda movies is the secret to longevity?

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  20. Hans Bethe by alphaseven · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not only that, he worked along with Hans Bethe who was born in 1906, and he's still alive (and still working last I read).

    Probably just a coincidence, maybe...

  21. This article is a travesty. by Mordant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beyond a few well-worn platitudes, it's obvious that the interviewer is almost completely ignorant of the history surrounding Edward Teller's life - essentially, the key events of the 20th Century.

    If it were not for Dr. Teller, there likely wouldn't be an Internet nor a Slashdot, because we'd all be too afraid of arrest by the KGB to do anything other than quote Marxist platitudes at one another at our jobs in Red October Tractor Factory #5 or whatever. And for this callow young woman to speculate that the world would've been better off without this man - the least technical of whose works she obviously has no concept of understanding, given her total ignorance of science and mathematics (it shows in the article) - and then to brand him as the incarnation of evil on this planet, ruminating on how the world would be a better place had he never lived, is boundlessly hypocritical.

    Even if she had enough historical and/or scientific knowledge to be entitled to opinions on these matters, the fact remains that she demonstrates no appreciation of the fact that she met someone who was truly a great man. Not necessarily a good man (though I certainly believe him to be so), but one of those who has truly made a mark on the history of the human race.

    Hell, Teller obtained his PhD under the tutelage of no less a personage than Heisenberg, himself. That alone ought to bring out a note of respect for the man.

    It's truly sad that such a brainless nitwit wasted some of the ever-dwindling store of hours Dr. Teller had left to him.

  22. I met him once... by Scott+Ransom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I posted this a few years ago for a related story, but it seems worth repeating now:

    So, I met him in an pseudo-interview with about 6 other students. I asked him if it ever bothered him to be the "Father of the H-Bomb" since his "baby" could be used for such evil and/or immoral purposes.

    I thought he was going to jump out of his chair at me.

    He got very upset and angrily announced that a scientist's only responsibility is to science. The possible uses of a discovery should not even be considered by the researchers -- that is someone elses business. And because of this, he did not feel even the slightest bit of remorse for his work on the bomb.

    And then he upbraided _me_ (since I was on my way to grad school to become a scientist at the time) for thinking that a scientist _should_ worry about the moral implications of his/her work.

    Needless to say, I didn't ask any more questions. ;)

    1. Re:I met him once... by refactored · · Score: 4, Funny
      So long as they go up,
      who cares where they come down,
      that's not my department
      says Werner von Braun.
      by Tom Lehrer
    2. Re:I met him once... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, hydrogen bombs are design to kill millions of people in one go. There is no obvious good utility for an atomic weapon of any kind.

      Not only that. I think it was Oppenheimer, who opposed the H bomb, who pointed out that America was a better target for H-bombs than the USSR because it was much more urbanised. That was why he opposed it. Teller thought that if the US developed it the Russkies would take ages to catch up .... no prizes in hindsight to see he was wrong on that.

      At least Teller gave us the Arms Race and many kool end of the world SF movies. Oh wait that's a negative thing isn't it....

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  23. Re:Missiles are necessary by Gherald · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know if I am comfortable with the word "guessed" being used in that context.

  24. Re:Missiles are necessary by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nope, they won't even need an SUV. They'll just build it in place. It makes the whole thing much easier and cheaper that way since you can make a big, heavy, crude sucker out of whatever you can turn to the task.

    You just rent that abandoned warehouse on the edge of town. Every big town has many to choose from.

    No need to be a kamikaze either since you don't need to worry about getting close enough to the target like you do with a conventional bomb.

    Either set a timer a week or so down the road, set it off with a radio,, or maybe a phone call, or. . .gasp, use the internet.

    KFG

  25. great pic of "the sausage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great pic of the sausage can be found here:

    The Sausage

    It doesn't look too impressive until you see the guy sitting in front of it, which puts it into perspective. This was the United State's first thermonuclear device. Yield: 10.4 megatons. Made a big boom. =)

  26. scientist or advocate? by Goonie · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Given Teller's prominence as a scientist, you'd expect that his orbituary would say "he discovered the furble effect", or something like it. But in all the obits I've read all that it says is that he "headed Lawrence Livermore" and "advocated for" various things, giving the impression that Teller was perhaps an outstandingly successful science politician rather than an outstanding scientist.

    Is this accurate or not?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  27. Re:A great? by javiercero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He was also a cretin who tried to destroy the carreers of more talented people who stood in his way (Oppenheimer cough) he used other physicist under fear of alienation, rather than by sheer briliance and respect.

    His contributions to the field of physics are nil, unlike Oppenheimer et al.

    He also brought the most destructive power in the universe and allowed humans to not only destruct themselves but the whole planet. That is just too rotten... thank you Mr. Teller!

  28. Re:Wow he was old by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but what people are forgetting is that this was really just his half life....

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  29. Re:Missiles are necessary by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    make a big, heavy, crude sucker out of whatever you can turn to the task.

    The word "crude" has no place around atomic weapons. You've got to line up the atoms exactly, or almost nothing happens.

    However, it would be quite reasonable to ship a bomb as little parts, each 40kg or less, which can be assembled near the target site. I'd personally recommend concealing them inside the air-gaps within wide-screen TVs being shipped from China, but there are lots of ways to hide these things.

    gasp, use the internet.

    I've got a screenplay to sell you. An attractive teenage hacker stumbles onto a terrorist plot to nuke Washington, but he wards it off with a quick DDoS worm. Now he's got to find the bomb and unplug it while dodging the FBI and HLS agents hot on his trail!

  30. "Perils of Modern Living" by E-prospero · · Score: 4, Funny

    An old, but good poem, originally published in the New Yorker, that makes mention of Dr Teller. RIP.
    --

    Perils of Modern Living - Harold P. Furth

    Well up above the tropostrata
    There is a region stark and stellar
    Where, on a streak of anti-matter
    Lived Dr. Edward Anti-Teller.

    Remote from Fusion's origin,
    He lived unguessed and unawares
    With all his antikith and kin,
    And kept macassars[1] on his chairs.

    One morning, idling by the sea,
    He spied a tin of monstrous girth
    That bore three letters: A. E. C.[2]
    Out stepped a visitor from Earth.

    Then, shouting gladly o'er the sands,
    Met two who in their alien ways
    Were like as gentils. Their right hands
    Clasped, and the rest was gamma rays.

    --
    [1]. Macassar oil was a popular hair dressing in the 19th century, named after the Indonesian port where the oil purportedly came from. An "antimacassar" is the decorative fabric used on chairs or sofas to protect the upholstery.

    [2]. AEC=Atomic Energy Commission, now replaced by DOE=Department of Energy. The AEC (like the DOE today) funded most of the National Laboratories, including Teller's Livermore Laboratory.

    --
    ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
  31. Re:He was the Osama Bin Laden of Science by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, Teller wasnt't the mad one, Curtis LeMay was the crazy one.

    He scared the Congress and President so much as both the head of SAC and as a loon that they instituted the Civilian Control of Nuclear Weapons so that he couldn't use them as much as he wanted to.

  32. Re:Missiles are necessary by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry.. the "Star Wars" program died when the Soviet Union did. It was ostensibly meant to counter their massive ICBM threat. What is was really meant to do was (kind of a re-vamp of the 70s moon program) to force them to spend billions of rubles on developing their own counterpart (or a way to defeat it). They started this, and then finally, at long last, fell bankrupt under their own stagnation.

    It was the best non-deployed weapons program ever conceived.

    And it should stay that way.

  33. Teller and Alaska by polarfleece · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever heard of Project Chariot? Dr. Teller and his pals wanted to try atomic excavation by detonating 4 devices at Cape Thompson near Point Hope on the Chukchi Sea in Northwest Alaska, creating an artifical harbor.
    It was the Eskimo's against the AEC, and the Eskimo's won, Thank God.
    Teller had the support of the Alaskan business community and the University of Alaska.
    As it happens, Project Chariot ended up being subject to the very first environmental review of any federal project, and eventually they (AEC) gave up.
    Teller didn't and shot off SEDAN, one of the dirtiest shots ever and the largest cratering experiment done at NTS.
    Dan O'Neil's book The Firecracker Boys tells the whole story in fine fashion.

  34. A city here, a city there by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Note that 100% of Japanese cities were bombed flat in WWII...
    Not quite true. Kyoto was never bombed. Several others. Hiroshima and Nagasaki escaped bombing until the final attacks. Why? Certain people knew the A Bomb was coming, and they wanted to see the effect on an untouched city.

    Many Japanese still believe that Kyoto was never bombed out of respect for that city's cultural importance. One version of the story has it that there was that there was a tacit agreement between the U.S. and Japanese militaries that bombers would ignore Kyoto as long as there was no antiaircraft artillery there. The reality is that Kyoto was the very first city on the list of atomic targets, and was only spared by bad weather, which caused the attack to be diverted to Nagasaki.

    Pretty cold, I know. I think you before you get all self righteous either way ("day of infamy" versus "atomic genocide"), you have to remember that millions of people had already died on both sides. Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as bad as they were, were distinctive only for the means by which they were destroyed. In terms of people killed and human suffering, they were minor affairs.

    On the other hand, the whole "was it justified" debate is rather pointless. The bombs didn't end the war (that was done by a coup in Tokyo that was already underway), nor did they raise the level of atrocity more than a notch (previous firebomb raids had killed hundreds of thousands without any atomic stuff). I find it rather ironic that Teller himself went over to the "we should have demoed the bomb first" camp just before he died. That's a cop-out. If you invent nasty weapons, they will be used.

  35. Corrections by achurch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless you recognize the name, you'd have no way to tell [Hiroshima] apart from any other gleaming Japanese city.

    Except for the Genbaku (Atomic Bomb) Dome sitting right squat in the middle of the city. That is still as it was 58 years ago, and is probably what the original poster was referring to. Seeing that symbol of destruction really makes you think (and if not, then with all due respect you've got problems).

    Note that 100% of Japanese cities were bombed flat in WWII, so all buildings are less than 50 years old (even without the bombing, earthquakes would keep destroying them).

    Wrong on all counts. Plenty of Japanese cities (though granted mostly smaller ones) escaped being bombed, and even the ones that were bombed were not "bombed flat"--even Tokyo has a fair number of buildings lasting from before the war. Besides, Japanese buildings are built to withstand earthquakes; one wooden temple building in Kyoto (Sanjusangendo) has been standing for over 700 years.

  36. Re:Continuously amazed by clueless fatalists on /. by cranos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Brief history lesson, Germans almost develop ABomb, Americans using German know how do finish it. Americans only people to actually use a nuclear device in anger. Soviets steal secrets of ABomb from the Americans.

    MAD isn't such a bad idea, unfortunately it relies on the premise that both sides are unwilling to risk it all in a conflict. It also relies on the fact that both sides have the same capabilities. If one side develops a technology that would mean they wont get wiped out in a world war then the balance has been thrown out of whack, and that is where things get dangerous.

    Then you get the rogue states like Israel and North Korea, those who possess nuclear weapons yet refuse to sign onto the international treaties that form the basis of the MAD doctirine.

    Teller didn't "balance the scales", if you want to get technical, the Soviets balanced the scales by stealing the Abomb.

  37. Re:Missiles are necessary by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That's a somewhat simpleminded analysis. Yes, having antimissiles for defense won't protect us from all nukes, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't develop them.

    No one would accept the army following the logic, "The enemy has guns, so we could buy bulletproof vests for our soldiers, but if we did that the enemy would just sneak up on them and use knives or bombs instead, so let's not bother with the bulletproof vests and let our soldiers get shot to pieces."

    Who's to say that there won't be a suicidal/insane dictator in Africa? Or more likely, what happens if the US decides to invade N. Korea? (Perhaps on a mistaken belief that they don't really have long range missiles, or perhaps for other reasons) In that situation the leader of N. Korea might decide that he's fucked anyways, and decide to launch against the US.

    If the US has no antimissile defense, it's going to be in a tough spot. The fact that we can turn N. Korea into a parking lot afterwards won't make those of us on the west coast feel much better about the situation. There's even a slight chance the US won't feel that launching a counterstrike is politically viable. Our friends in S. Korea wouldn't be too happy about all the radiation right next door, and although i would expect internation opinion to be on our side, the way the US has been treating it's allies lately, who knows?

    If the US had an antimissile shield on the other hand, N. Korea's nukes get blown up in flight, and the ground invasion grinds on.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  38. Sure there is... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Informative

    > There is no obvious good utility for an atomic weapon of
    > any kind.

    Look up something called Project Orion.

    That Orion never got off the ground (pun unintended) for stupid political reasons is truely a crime against science and the human spirit.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:Sure there is... by nusuth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you need nukes, nothing else will do. For things like building a 50 man moon base and flying it from Earth to Moon in one go or taking humans to outer planets in a few months or sending probes out of solar system that will reach their destinations in a lifetime, nothing except Orion will do. That still is the case and I don't see how that can change given the physics of propulsion. It could have worked, and it still can work. Instead of writing it off as an insane idea and staying on this planet I would rather see the technology developed and used until we have an alternative.

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  39. Oppie was a Commie by rogersc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Oppenheimer really was a Communist, according to a recent book. See also this NY Times article.

    A lot of left-wing scientists hated Teller for his ambiguous testimony about Oppenheimer, but Oppenheimer really was a security risk.

  40. No mention of Ulam? by piotru · · Score: 3, Informative

    For good or bad, Teller wasn't the only father of the hydrogen bomb.
    From:
    http://www.phy.bg.ac.yu/web_projects /giants/teller .html

    ----
    Teller and his colleagues at Los Alamos made little actual progress in designing a workable thermonuclear device until early in 1951, when the physicist Stanislaw M. Ulam proposed to use the mechanical shock of an atomic bomb to compress a second fissile core and make it explode; the resulting high density would make the burning of the second core's thermonuclear fuel much more efficient. Teller in response suggested that radiation, rather than mechanical shock, from the atomic bomb's explosion be used to compress and ignite the thermonuclear second core. Together these new ideas provided a firm basis for a fusion weapon, and a device using the Teller-Ulam configuration, as it is now known, was successfully tested at Enewetak atoll in the Pacific on Nov. 1, 1952; it yielded an explosion equivalent to 10 million tons (10 megatons) of TNT.

    ----

  41. Edward the Great by im+a+fucking+coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently nobody studies history anymore, but Mr. Teller should be recognized as a national hero of science.

    Oppenheimer had been closely associated with communists from his earliest relationships, had latter vigorously attempted to stop H bomb development, and the secrets of the atomic bomb were stolen from under his management. To fault Teller for bearing true witness is lunacy, nearly as crazy as it was to fault Robert for his friendships and point of view, (which he had forthrightly admitted prior to becoming admin of Los Alamos).

    Moreover, Teller had a legitimate reason to fear and despise Stalin, along with any group to which he was associated, having witnessed the terror of the Red army spilling familial blood in the streets of Hungary. He had first hand knowledge of the depths of its depravity, and was prescient in his understanding that only inexplicable horror would sate the whims of communist dictators.

    That he should love this country enough to devote the greater part of his life and mental energies to protecting US dominance and expanding our sphere of influence to cover the globe demonstrates an uncanny foresight coupled with what must have been a deeply held love for the whole of humanity. Admittedly he hid it well with gruff mannerisms, but any other conclusions are based on illogical, often hysterical premises.

    Consider the historical context: Both the Germans AND Japanese were developing nuclear weapons. Stalin killed 25 million Russians, Poles, Jews, etc. Germans killed untold millions after working them to death, and experimented on living 'subjects'. The Japanese were guilty of the Bataan death march, and countless atrocities not limited even to hacking off prisoners penises and sewing them to their lips while still alive, and easily raping and killing millions of innocent civilians. You have to be strictly ignorant of the 20th century not to realize that our obtaining first mastery of atomic structure is the only thing that stopped terrorism on a continental scale. If any of these parties had gained an unanswerable first strike nuclear capability, the untold misery of billions would have hung in the balance.

    Teller, Szilard, Oppenheimer, Rabi, Bohr, Rutherford, Einstein, and the other scientists involved in atom & H bomb development are owed a HUGE debt of gratitude by the world, by civilization itself.

    The world is a shade darker with the loss of Edward's brilliance.

    Kommando Chris

    PS: It's sad to realize the unknowing sacrifice of .25 million Nipponese saved the lives of at least 15 million. If you can coherently argue otherwise, I agree to disagree, but would encourage an indepth study of Japan circa 1920-45 rather than trade meaningless barbs. The study of radiation effects is impossible to understand humanely, but asking a million Marines to kill millions is hardly an adequate answer.
    Hirohito was powerless and mute without the shock and terror delivered to the populous, and if the destruction of Tokyo by bombardment had not produced the desired surrender (civilians were ordered to stay in their homes and try to put out the fires until dead), how many more millions should we have blown up to bring the war to an end?
    Simply put, it was the most horrible and humane way to bring a merciful end to the insanity of that war.
    PSS: Pacifists (Einstein, Szilard & Fermi(?)) hatched the idea of atomic bombs, the liberal Democrats (FDR) in government secretly commited to and funded these 'horrible' and 'inhumane' weapons, a 'communist' (Oppie) developed them, and another Democrat (Truman) dropped them. Please explain to me why I'm more intelligent, compassionate and humane as a pacifist Democratic voter again? Oh yeah, our party blew up 250,000 innocent civilians. And we freed the slaves, er... wait a minute... and we directly increased taxes to consumers by increasing taxes on the evil corporations, who only add that cost directly to their goods and services...ummmm, shit. Harakiri anyone?

    1. Re:Edward the Great by ojQj · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most of your post sounds plausible but I'd like to take issue with one (off-topic) point you made:

      and we directly increased taxes to consumers by increasing taxes on the evil corporations, who only add that cost directly to their goods and services

      When a tax on a good is increased, it is rarely the case that the full cost of that tax is passed on to the consumer. How much is passed on depends on the elasticity of demand (ie, taxes on cigarettes come primarily out of the consumers pocket. Taxes on little niceties nobody really needs come primarily out of the pockets of the producers. Elasticy of demand does have a mathematical representation, but I'm just trying to give you the general idea). More important: we don't tax corporations or anybody else for that matter just because they are evil. We tax them to fund projects and programs. Some projects are for the public good and wouldn't get paid for otherwise. Public education, public roads, a defensive military, and public vaccinations are all good examples of such projects.

      My (very conservative) economics professor taught this to me, and supplied the supporting mathematics. Actually deciding which projects to fund, and what an appropriate tax policy is is a much better area in which to present your arguments.

      Despite some of the over-simplified sound bytes coming out of the two parties, this is what the power struggle between them amounts to. But if we loose sight of this goal and the environment of facts through which we have to navigate to get there by repeating the sound bytes, then we aren't going to get there.

  42. Goodbye, Teller... by Enoch+Root · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mad scientists and evil overlords everywhere mourn your passing!

  43. Now one of the most sought after scuba sites by Angostura · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The site of that test is now a mecca for diving enthusiasts, but the person who owns the dive rights only opens the waters for very limited usage. Hence divers dream about being able to dive in the waters which now has an immensely rich biodiversity. But they know they are unlikely to ever get there. FWIW's the test was an astonishing attempt to try and see what effect the bomb would have on a real fleet. There is at least one aircraft carrier down there.

  44. Rockets and Racists by TygerFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are a lot of threads here, some of them old and ugly.

    1. With regard to the Middle Eastern Mess; it's, well, a mess. None of the Ugly anti-semitic, anti-jewish/anti-arab arguments, slurs, conspiracy theories--ancient and modern-- and what have you are anything like necesary.

    Really, save yourself the energy; borrow a page from Witgenstein and, instead of making meaningless statements, why not just say that sickening generalizations aren't worth your time? Really, they aren't and can't be when playing with a yo-yo for the time it took to think up the biggot-stuff would at least have the fact that it built motor coordination to recommend it.

    2. Concerning the star wars/anti star wars arguments, it's a nasty can of worms to have opened. Now that that it's in the world, the people who like it seem to hold it in a similar light to that which is usually reserve for questions of religious faith. Star wars just won't die and that's too bad, considering how short life is. I obviously fall on the 'anti' side when it comes to the issue and I think my reasons are good.

    Long thoughtful books have been written on just what crap the whole notion of missle defense is. Missile screens are vastly expensive and, like the Maginot Line, limited by their specialization. Worse still, If nothing else, the September 11 attacks clearly and unequivocally demonstrate that the traditional 'nuclear deterrent' enjoyed by the great powers is itself ineffective and is rapidly becoming less so because every small nation that gets nuclear arms and aims them at anything important get to thumb its nose at the great powers that have them. Current affairs in North Korea, suggest that if Saddam Hussein had had them, he'd be smoking a cigar in Baghdad right now.

    Real, effective, missile defense is decades and tens, if not hundreds of billions away and even if it had been up and running, running perfectly, from some spotless control center two years ago, it would have been meaningless against 20 guys in the right place armed with ten bucks worth of boxcutters.

    In the world of fantasy and need, a simple, single solution like star wars is a magic bullet. Magic bullets aren't like the real world's compromises and partial successes; magic bullets solve all known old problems and create no new ones. When people imagine a magic bullet, hope blows away common sense, in this case, at an unimaginable cost.

    Star wars is expensive. Boxcutters are cheap, but real, sustainable peace is cheaper still.

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
  45. NPR Coverage... by johnwyles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard NPR cover this story yesterday and they had stated that he was very careful about what he said, and did not want to be taken out of context; so much so, that he would time his response to questions with a stopwatch!

    --
    [[ the only 15 letter word that is spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable: it may soon be, however. ]]
  46. Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie by Chaltek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rather than just reading about them, view actual footage of many nuclear tests as well as extensive interviews with Teller in Trinity and Beyond: The Atomic Bomb Movie
    It is a very moving documentary chronicling the development of atomic weaponry.

  47. What Teller most wanted to be remembered for. by SeanAhern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the laboratory that Teller and E. O. Lawrence founded back in the 50s. Teller still came into the lab every few days or so up the point of his death. Periodically, he would give Q/A sessions with summer students and other interested parties.

    On July 24 of this year, I attended one of these. I can write a lot about what he had to say, but what has come to the fore of my mind since the news of his death was one question in particular. Someone asked him what he most wanted to be remembered for. He responded that his discovery of the "Jahn-Teller effect" was the work that he was most proud of. It involes crystal symmetry arising from interactions between elecrons and nuclei, and turned out to be very important for material science.

    This was work that he did to help unravel certain energy configurations of the benzene molecule. I'm not a chemist, so I only have the vaguest notion of what the Jahn-Teller effect entails. But it involves calculating the electron distribution of a molecule, coupled with its vibrational energy. If I am understanding it correctly, Jahn and Teller first demonstrated that the two energy states can be coupled, allowing for a lower, most stable energy state than if each were considered separately. It's still studied to this day.

    Teller got very animated while he was talking about his work on this. I find it a shame that none of the writeups and obituaries I've read have mentioned this work. This is my small contribution.

  48. Books that put Teller's role in perspective by gvc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recommend two books that detail the wartime and postwar efforts to build the bomb. Teller's roles, both in the technology and the politics, are covered. So are the roles of many other players, including Germans and Russians.

    The making of the atomic bomb and Dark Sun - The making of the hydrogen bomb, by Richard Rhodes.

    Rhodes won a Pulitzer for the first volume and I daresay it is the better. Both are not without fault (in particular the second was not universally acclaimed in the physics community), but I found them intriguing.