Slashdot Mirror


Echolocation for Humans

anoopsinha writes "An article in New Scientist reports that bat echos can be used as virtual reality guide. People wearing headphones could easily hunt down a 'virtual insect', using only the echolocation sounds. The report says that it is a 'very intuitive process.' The researchers behind the project hope that a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks."

64 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Vindicated by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you drive, you can't look at the speedometer and the road at the same time,

    That's what I tried to tell him...

  2. Give it a try! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's not a skill we rely on overly, but you'll find you have it. Try closing your eyes and walking down a hallway. Eventually you'll brush against the wall. Try it again, making clicks with your tongue or other brief sounds. Even in an environment that doesn't echo much, you'll be surprised to find yourself in or near the center of the hallway at the other end.

    We did some experiments with this in cognitive theory class, and it was really, really bizarre.

    1. Re:Give it a try! by turk182x2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure this is the same technique I use to find my porn movies in the dark......

    2. Re:Give it a try! by korielgraculus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who do I sue about my broken nose?

    3. Re:Give it a try! by Dunark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did anyone ever notice how a live recording of a meeting sounds echoy, but it didn't seem that way when you were hearing it live? The echoes were there, but our hearing has a way of subtracting them out so we can hear what we're paying attention to more clearly. In order to subtract out the echoes, the brain has to create a model of the environment, and I think the awareness of what's around us is a byproduct.

    4. Re:Give it a try! by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks, now I have a big huge bruise on my head!

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    5. Re:Give it a try! by blakestah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course you did. Blind people use this all the time, it is referred to properly as the "obstacle sense".

      At one time this amazed scientists - blind people could walk through a room without hitting objects. So, they covered their bodies in thick felt, and the blind still had their obstacle sense. Then, they filled their ears with wax, and the blind bumped into things.

      Sighted people lack the obstacle sense, but can learn it in a few hours. No clicking or other extra noise generation is necessary.

    6. Re:Give it a try! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all seeing people are missing it. As a sound technician, this is a side-effect that I've noticed I got as I increased my audio awareness.

      It's based mostly upon hearing the doppler effect from objects that are around us as circulating air hits things. Almost everyone can probably hear these sounds, but they're mostly low frequency and rather quiet, like whispers. The real trouble in doing it is picking the sounds out of all the other random sounds you hear. I've quite gotten used to having the sense. It's incredibly useful when driving, because cars displace a lot of air (which, as I said, causes this effect), and you can hear them on every side and determine their speed relative to your own with relative success fairly easily.

      Now, though, it freaks me out when it's cold and I have to cover up my head. I get the feeling that something is following me (because I can't "feel" anything behind me).

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    7. Re:Give it a try! by blancolioni · · Score: 4, Funny

      At one time this amazed scientists - blind people could walk through a room without hitting objects. So, they covered their bodies in thick felt, and the blind still had their obstacle sense. Then, they filled their ears with wax, and the blind bumped into things.

      And then they published their results, in a brightly coloured book called "21 Fun Things to do with Blind People."

  3. been done before? by c4ffeine · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard about something on a TV show a few years ago. It talked about some guy who was training deaf people to "echolocate" using clicks. Supposedly, they were able to walk, tell the diff between walls and shrubs, and even skateboard. Does anyone know about this?

    --
    "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  4. Did not understand the article by civilengineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can someone explain to me what the article is trying to say? I know that we developed eyesight to see the world around us and bats developed ultrasonic sound and ears to percieve it. But, how is becoming "batman" going to help improve our situation?

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:Did not understand the article by Narphorium · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you think of the human body as a computer. This would be equivalent to discovering a new port through which we can recieve additional information.
      It means that we might be able to absorb more information faster and easier.

  5. I've used bat calls before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    and they still havent helped me pick up the perfect who-likes-short-shorts bat woman.

  6. Applications for the blind? by ravind · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I missed something, but can't this be used to help the blind navigate around their homes or even outdoors? It's the first thing I would think of rather than fighter pilots.

    1. Re:Applications for the blind? by qbwiz · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    2. Re:Applications for the blind? by AndyChrist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tried this myself for a little while a few years ago. I'm sure with more practice it could be improved, but the best resolution I could get was about 6 feet. I could tell there was an object if it was about 6 feet across (good for walls, cars, stands of trees) and to within about 6 feet (if it was just a few multiples of that away). This in a few hours. I used a bottle cap to make my clicks. I suspect that tongue clicks would be less consistent (but on the other hand, would be more flexible)

      I'd really like to see some independent confirmation of that Team Bat guy's claims, though. I've got doubts as to whether the guy could say, tell a curb was coming up while riding a bike, or avoid a signpost. Larger objects are easy to avoid. Riding a bike in starlight, you can hear mailboxes along the road better than you can see them. But some things, I'm skeptical.

      Still, even if they can only detect larger objects, like buildings or fences, it would have to be a tremendous help in navigation for a blind person.

  7. A blind man does it already. by haydon4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember some 5 or 6 years ago I saw a story on some daytime talk show about people overcoming their disabilities; not that it's all that unusual, but one guest in particular who has been blind since birth, actually used echolocation to get around. He made regular clicking sounds with his tounge and he could navigate down a city street without any real assistance. It was actually quite amazing. Although, I don't know any blind fighter pilots but the principal is sound. Humans do have echolocation abilities, it would just take a long time time to develop any natural ability.

  8. Holy smoke! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Holy smoke! The penguin thinks he can escape us into that smokescreen! Quick, Robin, give me the bat-sonar-headphones!

  9. George Lucas isn't a fool then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What you hear in Star Wars isn't sound in space, it's echolocation technology.

    1. Re:George Lucas isn't a fool then by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always imagined that audible explosions in space opera somehow relate to interference picked up on the pilots' radios.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    2. Re:George Lucas isn't a fool then by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ummm even if this is a joke, echos are sounds bounced off of an object and back to your ears so you're saying "What you hear in Star Wars isn't sound in space, it's sound in space."

  10. This would be nifty for cars... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though you'd have to neutralize for relatively high velocity, and map to a different signal entirely (probably radio), before converting into sound... Doppler would tell you relative speed, and you would need some sort of tracking system (headset/goggles + sensors?) to locate your ears...

  11. see things, eh by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 3, Funny

    So you mean all this time I've been getting banned from game servers for using mods to see everyone, it was a power all humans can develop?! Unfair!

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  12. Recording Microscopic Life by Basehart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    David Dunn's Angels and Insects, although not a study of audio based VR (or even featuring bat sounds for that matter), is a great place to get started listening to microscopic sounds.

    Here's an MP3 of some insects in Africa getting it on.

    If you think this stuff sounds like fun you might want to do what I did a few years ago and pick up a high quality microphone with a big diaphragm, such as an AKG C414, and get out into the woods at night and make some recordings. You'll be surprised what's out there when you start filtering out the sounds humans make and crank the volume!!

  13. Cool... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet I could get a blind-deaf person to navigate using only taste! Strap two solar cells to their forehead and run the wires to opposite sides of their tongue! Hey, it's only 1-pixel stereo vision, but better than nothing.

    --
    ...
  14. Didn't 3D audio in games tell us this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WWAAAAY back in quake2 I could track exactly where my opponents were on a map, as long as I was wearing headphones. The headphones were necessary to get the stereoimaging right, as speakers can be a bit difficult to set up. So how is this at all suprising?

  15. What it is like to be a bat by zerocircle · · Score: 4, Funny

    For as long as I can remember, I've been able to echolocate people moving around me while I'm near a CRT -- especially when I'm sitting at a computer. I can...shall we say, "feel" the movements of people behind me. (It's a spatial sense. Not sure how else to describe it.) It's not as if I can tell what they're doing with their hands or anything detailed like that (you know, dodging projectiles and such), but I'm aware of their general position.

    So now, of course, my primary machine has an LCD. No more echolocation. (Luckily, it's a laptop, so I can keep my back to the wall.) I don't have the 15.7 KHz whine of an electron tube to bounce off things around me. Ye gods, that infernal CRT whine...most people can't hear it, but it drives me bats.

    Oh dear. In all honesty, I wasn't trying to pun.

  16. echolocation = soundhax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    just make sure you don't get accused of wallhacking and then banned from life...

  17. Holy human hacking Batman! by pavon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Damn, this is the coolest thing I've read in a long time! Imagine having a second set of low grade eye that worked in the dark. You could do all sorts of cool things with it, like effectively having a set of eyes on the back of your head.

    The article mentions one potential application being that you could look at dials and switces without taking your eyes off what you were doing. However, would shifting your attention to echo location be as bad as looking away would? Think cell phones. It's kind of like chameleons - they can point their eyes in different directions, but can they concentrate on both of them at the same time? Could humans gain the ability to concentrate on more than one sensory input at a time? Probably not, but the input would still be there and would catch our attention anytime something notable happened. Like when we see something out of the corner of our eye, or hear our name in a crowd. Cognetics is so cool.

    It also talked about how bats adjust the frequency of the waves sent out, as the distance to the object changes. I imagine for a bat this would be as automatic as focusing our eyes is to us. We would have to do this manualy, like focusing a camera. Oh, but what if we interfaced the brain or some nerves and trained the mind to do the focusing!

    I've always thought that if I were to loose a limb in an accident I would be pounding down doors at universities acrossed the country to find one willing to attempt to use the nerves once controlling my limb to instead control a keyboard/mouse type interface (which would comunicate to the PC via bluetooth eventually). But this is even cooler, and I imagine provided a little information from Dean waters on this, you could build something like this on your own. Hot damn, I have a new project!

  18. Threat warning by RealUlli · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, probably a rather good idea, IMHO. Imagine a surround sound system telling the pilot the direction of a threat, encoding type and distance into frequency and volume of the sound.

    Or imagine a radar system encoding direction, distance and speed of a target into some surround sound system...

    To me, especially the threat warning system looks interesting, because you can hear something even if it's behind you, while your eyes only see stuff in front of you. Imagine, the advantage if you can hear at once that that radar site that just started chirping seems to be in the direction of the depression in the ridge you just passed so you can do something about it, or the fighter radar that just started chirping is at your 6 o'clock - that guy is in a bad position... wait, now he's switched from search to attack mode - now you're in trouble... ;-]

    Or if you could hear the drone of your wingman - you'd definitely hear if he gets out of position...

    Cheers, Ulli

    --
    Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
  19. Stereolocation by sakusha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As anyone with bad hearing in one ear (like me) will attest, stereo location using sound is a very weak sense. Having worked with stereoscopic 3D images for many years, I have found that about 10-20% of all people have vision problems in one eye that are just bad enough that they can't see the stereographic effect. I expect that similarly, there are enough people with weak hearing in one ear, enough to prevent a similarly large group from using audio stereolocation.

    1. Re:Stereolocation by 357_Magnum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I have uni-lateral hearing, which means that I can't hear anything at all in one ear. So I can attest to not having the ability to use hearing to pinpoint locations. If someone calls my name in a large area, it will take me a long time to find the person. Most of the time I can get by simply by making sure I move my head around to ensure that I can hear things around me, which has actually made me more sensitive to lots of sounds since I have to constantly listen. Things like the telephone and headphones make me not able to hear the outside world, which is difficult sometimes when I have to use them. So a system that required stereo hearing would be lost on me totally.

      --
      Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori.
    2. Re:Stereolocation by Wirr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You could try blinding yourself - according to this then you would be able to locate sound with just one ear.

      Then again, that may be a bit high a price to achieve sound location abilities.

  20. Already knew it.. by schon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been doing this for ages - there is a hallway at work where the light switch is at the far end of the hall.. in winter, the hall is completely dark after 4PM or so.

    making clicks with your tongue or other brief sounds

    Actually, I just use my footfalls - I've got extremely sensitive hearing (I always know where our cat is because I can hear his footfalls on the carpet - which freaked out my wife for the first few years :o) so I don't need to make 'extra' sounds..

  21. Unfortunately by Boyceterous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this probably only works if there is only one "clicker" in the area. Otherwise you'd get your echoes confused with the others, with embarassing results. Also, there must be some relatively low velocity limit, since your interpretation of the echo likely depends on (your knowledge of) the origination point of the audio source. I bet parking meters and telephone poles are quite stealthy against this technology. Rather than trying to navigate yourself down a straight hallway alone, try blindfolding a bunch of people and get them to echolocate around a circle - better than twister!

  22. "Can this be modded down too?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, no problem.

  23. Echolocation by Kumochisonan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The researchers behind the project hope that a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks.

    Modern Science, innovating new ways of killing our fellow man more effectively!

    I also saw something on using echolocation with blind people a while back, according to the story, it doesn't take long for users to adapt. Saying that, Blind people have very sensitive hearing anyway.

    --
    kill elrond
    take elrond
    put elrond in cupboard
  24. shameless reply by gfody · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but.. tihs is aonhter ltitle kwon slkil

    Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
    1. Re:shameless reply by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Taht's cool as hlel.

    2. Re:shameless reply by alphaseven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know what's strange, how hundreds of weblogs all suddenly decided to include that text this weekend, starting on the 12th. Quite a quick meme.

    3. Re:shameless reply by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's old news, Slashdot editors have been on that from day one! ;-)

      --
      ...
    4. Re:shameless reply by gfody · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try this. Scroll a line of text off the screen (or cover it up with another window) such that you can only see a one or two pixel strip of the top. You can still read it!

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:shameless reply by kosmonaut+pirx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting, but seems to be an english phenomenon. I tried the same letter-shifting in a german sentence, and it was totally unreadable. As i am a native german, i shouldn't have had any problems, if this would work in german.

      Are there experiences with other languages?

      Greetings,

      Kosmo

    6. Re:shameless reply by aziraphale · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not a completely random reordering of the letters in each word, though. One of the key signals the brain interprets when looking at words is the shape of the outline. It looks for clusters of ascenders and descenders as clues as to what the word might be. The text above tends to preserve these groupings more than a completely random approach would (look at 'wlohe', 'tihng' for example). Some important contextual clues are also preserved, like double 't's in 'ltteers', the 'gh' in 'rghit', the 'n't' at the end of 'deosn't', and so on. And of course the process completely preserves the ordering of words of three letters or less.

      I've been an editor and proofreader, and the fact that misspelled words can easily be overlooked in context because your brain imposes error correction is well known in those professions - proofreaders have to train themselves to isolate each word and look past their brain's interpretation of what it says to see what it really says.

      What's amazing is that you probably don't have to be that careful a reader to pick up that 'rscheearch' and 'iprmoetnt' were spelled incorrectly - they both jar your brain a little more than every other word in the paragraph. So it's not an excuse to just start spelling words any way you please - you still need to know what letters you need in each word.

    7. Re:shameless reply by kzadot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it works with english and most other languages, but german is an exception because of its overuse of single-syllable stems, conjugation, and its excessivley rigid fixation with writing things how they are pronounced and vice versa.

      Thats also why its stuck in the middle ages with useless contructs like gender and different forms of address, for lords and slaves.

      It really needs to free itself up a bit more and evolve like english did. Remember english started out as german, but its flexibility permitted improvement.

    8. Re:shameless reply by chris_sawtell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does this prove that the ideograph languages are better at getting the message across?

    9. Re:shameless reply by Punto · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with AC; it seems to work with spanish (wich by the way, it's very much written how it's pronounced, and vice versa).

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  25. Used in Babylon 5 by Mick+D. · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was actually used in the show Babylon 5. If I am remembering the posts online by the exec. producer and main writer, JMS, he said that they wanted to use sound effects for space battles but also wanted to be accurate to the reality of space where there shouldn't be any sound.

    So the technique they used was to describe the sound effects as assistive to the pilots like full surround sound in video games to give a viceral sense the position of the other things around. They maybe explained that a total of once of twice on the series itself, but the idea stuck with me as a very good idea even in the relatively normal environment of todays fighter jets or even for situational awareness in cars on the highway.

    --

    Is this the end yet?...How 'bout now...how 'bout now...how 'bout now?
  26. Re:Cool... by qbwiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Surprisingly this, too, has been done , albeit in a slightly more complex form.

    --
    Ewige Blumenkraft.
  27. No clicking required! by Jetson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    this probably only works if there is only one "clicker" in the area. Otherwise you'd get your echoes confused with the others, with embarassing results.

    Not really. You're thinking in terms of radar, where azimuth and range are determined by matching a single ping with a single pong. In such systems, multiple sources or multiple path replies are a source of confusion since they add too much information to the process. If you're trying to paint a sonic landscape, however, you don't want to try and associate a single ping and pong since that would only identify the range to a single reflector in one small portion of your area of interest. Instead, you want to receive as much information about the environment as possible from each ping. Having someone/something else making the ping isn't a problem as long as they don't overwhelm the replies.

    As an experiment, try sitting in a place with a fair amount of white noise (such as CPU fans). Now slowly bring your right hand toward your ear with your palm open. The first thing you'll notice is a loss of some higher frequency ambient sounds from the right side. As the hand gets closer, you may notice an increase in reflected noises that originated on your left. Eventually you will be able to judge the distance between your ear and your palm simply by the tone of the noise.

  28. AFAIK, already in development before w/Airforce by naztafari · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hey, good logical explanation for Star Wars sounds!

    a similar system in the cockpit of fighter planes could allow pilots to track some controls using their hearing, freeing up their eyes for other tasks

    The Airforce already has been developing this already, not with echolocation though. It was shown on discovery channel or something. Uses a more efficient system.

    Aircraft uses sensors to measure position of other aircraft in the vicinity then onboard computer replicates positions in 3D audio space fed to Pilot's Helmet.

    And it works. It helps track entities that are outside of the line of sight of the pilot.

    Been done years ago by Aureal A3D anyway. Too bad Creative Killed 'em off, ate em up and didn't utilize their technology (Audigy uses a different system -- check out 3dsoundsurge.com).

    I've got An SBLive and an A3D 3.0 soundcard. The A3D sounds sweeter and is better in hunting down opponents "echolocationally".
  29. Oh, take the walkman off! by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm sorry officer I was trying to drive by echolocation but I forgot to take the headphones off...

    --
    This is my sig.
  30. Amazing by JusTyler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was about to launch into cries of "idiot", "troll", and "crazy man", but two lines into your post I totally realized what was going on. That's pretty amazing stuff! And a bit spooky too when you're reading away at normal speed and know exactly what it says.

    It does, however, highlight the importance of context and knowledge, since Cmabrigde could be read as anything if we didn't all know about Cambridge.

  31. The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can bats flying blindly detect 1/100 inch wires from several feet away, dodge stalactites in pitch-dark caves, catch insects on the wing or fish in motion just below the surface of the water, and find their way back to their home roost? In this remarkable book, a pioneering scientist in the areas of neurobiology and behavior explains in layperson's language just how bats can "see" with their ears.

    Quoted from Amazon

  32. had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? by gfody · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pprhaes I was a llttie too qciuk wtih my psaire and esuianthtam. I jsut took a bcnuh of sectennes and ran samilir scnramblig prescesos oevr tehm, and smoe wree qutie unrdalbeae. I tnihk taht, prhapes, the oraginil scnetnee was clferauly curtsnocted to be screlambd, yet esay to raed, in oerdr to spaerd the meme. Pahreps?

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
    1. Re:had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? by alphaseven · · Score: 2, Informative
      btw, what's a meme?

      From one of the definitions in the google glossary:

      A contagious information pattern that replicates by parasitically infecting human minds and altering their behavior, causing them to propagate the pattern.
      From your post, it looks like you just found out what a meme is and how it spreads firsthand.
    2. Re:had to try for myself.. btw, whats a meme? by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a sidenote, there's a great book called _Thought Contagion_, although I don't remember who it's by. If you're interested in Memeonics (The study of Memes.) check out that book.

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  33. New Scientist Is Lame Again by Mooncaller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is nothing new. Most of the techniques, talked about, have been used with RADAR for decades. The thing that bats do, is interpret the sonic wavefront. This is accomplished by the structure of the head and ears. They produce subtle phase shifting depending on the direction the waves are coming from. Humans do this also, but not nearly to the degree that bats do it. Its the bats need to manipulate wavefronts that has caused the evolution of the many spectacular head shapes. If a model of one of the simpler bats ( i.e. not a Mexican Freetail) is made that duplicates the affect that a bat has on its call, and place microphones were the eardrums are, a human would still need a lot of training to learn how to interpret the signals. Bats probably have a hardware solution to do some of this interpratation ( just like humans have a partialy hardware solution to the problem of parsing speach phonems). The only cool "bat" thing, the artical talks about, is the dynamic nature of the sound generation. Bats are in effect using sound like hands, to feel. But this is not unique to bats. The gymnatoid eels do something simular with electric signals. They also use the chirp modulation thing. I noticed that the artical does have a link to Waters website. I guess that counters some of the lameness.

  34. Try it ylrsuoef -- smcbrlae aritarbry txet by delta407 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wrtoe a llitte sprcit in PHP taht dtaemrntesos tihs bivaoher. Cehck it out. I tnhik it's ptetry cool.

    (Of crouse, scroue cdoe is mdae aivllabae uednr the GPL.)

  35. Used it all my life... by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...well, for sports at any rate.

    Now, first things first, I'm not totally blind but I am legally blind. I have Achromatopsia, so I don't see a whole heck of a lot outside yet I can still play soccer, baseball, basketball (especially), Disc Golf and Ultimate Frisbee because I can hear what's going on around me at all times. I don't have to see where my disc lands I listen for the "thunk", with soccer and baseball there have been "beeper" balls for a long time and in basketball there are always sounds to let you know where the ball is (dribbling, passing, team mates, etc).

    Now, this technology couldn't be used en masse as another post pointed out because there would be too much interferance from others and using headphones would block out other important sounds like traffic and other pedestrians.

    Anywho, my $0.02

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  36. Additional anecdotal evidence by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    SF writer Arthur Clarke wrote an essay about the senses humans have and don't have. He reported seeing a blind man referee a table tennis game, successfully. Clarke also mention playing table tennis under a tin roof once. When it started raining, his game collapsed.

    Apparently we're better than we know at pinpointing sharp sounds in the environment.

  37. BINCAS by Thagg · · Score: 4, Informative

    There were a series of article written back in the early 80's in Sport Aviation, the house organ of the Experimental Aviation Association, about a radar system for light planes that worked in a similar way. The guy had built extremely cheap, short range (two miles, say) radars out of coffee cans. He mounted two of them in an airplane, pointed 45 degrees to the left and right of the centerline, and rigged stereo headphones to them. The idea would be that you could hear other traffic in the air, and then locate them with your eyes to see and avoid them.

    It's surprisingly hard to pick up light planes visually, they are tiny specks right up until the time that they fill the windshield. The response of the FAA has been the TCAS systems -- which are extremely complex and eyewateringly expensive (about $1M per system) This makes sense for jetliners, but is out of the question for light planes.

    As near as I can tell, nobody did anything with the BINCAS system after the articles came out. It was a cool idea, though.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  38. Re:shameless reply - Even Google understands by Frans+Faase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems even Google understands it, because the search results started with: "Do you mean: According research".

  39. Perl script to do this for you by JusTyler · · Score: 2, Interesting
    $_ = "A significantly amazing demonstration of scrambled words.";
    s/(\b\w)(\w+)(?=\w\b)/$1 . &shuffle($2)/ge;
    print;

    sub shuffle {
    my @z = split //, $_[0];
    return join '', map { $z[$_->[0]] }
    sort { $a->[1] <=> $b->[1] }
    map { [$_ , rand ($#z ^ 2)] } (0..$#z);
    }